Bilateral High Hip Center Provides Gait Parameters Similar to Anatomical Reconstruction: A Gait Analysis Study in Hip Replacement Patients With Bilateral Developmental Dysplasia

Postoperative hip center position is associated with gait symmetry in range of axial rotation in dysplasia patients after THA

Background

This study aimed to explore whether pre- or postoperative hip structures or surgical changes significantly influence hip range of motion (ROM) symmetry in patients with hip dysplasia during gait after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and provide possible surgical suggestions.

Methods

Fourteen patients with unilateral hip dysplasia underwent computed tomography before and after surgery to create three-dimensional hip models. Pre- and postoperative acetabular and femoral orientations, hip rotation centers (HRC), and femoral lengths were measured. Bilateral hip ROM during level walking after THA was quantified using dual fluoroscopy. The ROM symmetry in flexion-extension, adduction-abduction, and axial rotation was calculated using the symmetry index (SI). The relationship between SI and the above anatomical parameters and demographic characteristics was tested using Pearson's correlation and linear regression.

Results

The average SI values for flexion-extension, adduction-abduction, and axial rotation during gait were -0.29, -0.30, and -0.10, respectively. Significant correlations were detected mainly in the postoperative HRC position. A distally placed HRC was associated with increased SI values for adduction-abduction (R = -0.47, p = 0.045), while a medially placed HRC was associated with decreased SI values for axial rotation (R = 0.63, p = 0.007). A regression analysis indicated that horizontal HRC positions significantly determined axial rotational symmetry (R² = 0.40, p = 0.015). Normal axial rotation SI values were achieved with HRC between 17 mm medially and 16 mm laterally.

Conclusions

Postoperative HRC position was significantly correlated with gait symmetry in the frontal and transverse planes in patients with unilateral hip dysplasia after THA. Surgical reconstruction of the HRC to between 17 mm medially and 16 mm laterally may contribute to gait symmetry.

THA in patients with neglected acetabular fractures

Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) outcomes in patients with neglected acetabular fractures are less favourable compared to THA for osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis. These poorer clinical outcomes are largely due to an unexpected bone deficiency, and the procedure is more time-consuming and complicated for cases that require acetabular reconstruction and bone grafting. The clinical outcomes of THA in neglected acetabular fractures are not often studied. Methods: This study is a retrospective single surgeon series of THA for 51 neglected acetabular fractures in 49 patients treated with THA alone, open reduction and internal fixation with THA, or acetabular defect reconstruction THA. Our series aims to focus on the surgical technique and describe the functional and radiological outcomes of neglected acetabular fractures treated with different THA approaches by a single surgeon. Results: Using the Harris Hip score at the mean long-term follow-up, there was a clear improvement in 90% of patients in the present study. The long-term results are encouraging in terms of clinical improvement, radiographic restoration of acetabular bone stock, and the centre of restoration. Discussion: The series shows that with proper planning and reconstruction using structural bone grafting techniques, a neglected fracture-dislocation with loss of structural support can be satisfactorily treated using primary components alone. Bony reconstruction and use of primary cementless components ensure long-term survival and preserve bone stock for an easier revision of THA, if necessary, in the future.

Postoperative Hip Center Position Associated With the Range of Internal Rotation and Extension During Gait in Hip Dysplasia Patients After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for hip dysplasia patients is sometimes complex and compromises pathomorphological changes in these patients. However, it remains unclear whether it is preoperative deformities or postoperative structures or anatomic changes during THA that have the most remarkable correlation with the hip dynamic function during gait. The purpose of this study was to investigate this relationship and propose insights into the surgical reconstruction strategy in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Methods: A total of 21 unilateral hip dysplasia patients received computed tomography scans for the creation of 3D hip models before surgery and at the last follow-up. Acetabular and femoral orientations, hip center positions, and femoral length were measured before and after THA. Hip kinematics of the operated side during gait was quantified using a dual fluoroscopic imaging technique. Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression were performed to evaluate the relationship between hip maximum range of motion in six directions and demographics characters and above hip anatomic parameters before and after THA and their changes in surgery.

Results: Pearson correlation analysis found significant correlations with the gait range of motion mainly in postoperative structures, including postoperative hip center positions and acetabulum and combined anteversion. Further multiple linear regression indicated that a laterally placed hip center was significantly correlated with an increased internal rotation (R2 = 0.25, p = 0.021), which together with increased postoperative acetabulum anteversion explained 45% of external rotation decreasing (p = 0.004). A proximally placed hip center was correlated with more extension (R2 = 0.30, p = 0.010). No significant demographic characters or preoperative deformities or surgical changes were included into other multiple regression models.

Conclusion: Strong correlations between postoperative structures, especially hip center positions and gait range of motion in unilateral hip dysplasia patients after THA were found. It indicated that postoperative prosthesis structures, particularly hip center positions had significant impact on the hip gait motion range and should be treated with particular caution in surgery.

Influence of shelf acetabuloplasty on the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in hips with dysplasia: a case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young adults, especially in those with hip dysplasia, is affected by wear and acetabular fixation problems. Shelf acetabuloplasty is performed to delay THA in patients with acetabular dysplasia. Thus, we conducted a retrospective, continuous case-control study at a single healthcare facility to analyze (1) the influence of prior shelf acetabuloplasty on the survival of a subsequent THA and (2) the functional outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated 105 patients (124 THA) who underwent THA due to hip dysplasia: 54 patients (61 THA) were included in the THA post-shelf acetabuloplasty group (case group) and 51 patients (63 THA) in the THA for dysplasia group (control group).

RESULTS

At 15 years' follow-up, 89% of patients (95% CI: 84-91%) in the shelf group and 83% (95% CI: 81-90%) in the dysplasia group had not undergone surgical revision. This difference between groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.566). The functional outcomes were satisfactory in both groups; however, they were significantly better in the dysplasia group than in the shelf group based on the Merle d'Aubigne and Postel score (16.9 vs 16.0 min-max: 14-18 vs 3-18) (p = 0.01), Harris Hip score (90.0 vs 84.7, min-max: 62-100 vs 22-100) (p = 0.017), and the Oxford-12 (18/60 vs 21/60, min-max: 45-12 vs 51-12) (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Shelf acetabuloplasty before THA does not negatively affect THA survivorship. The functional outcomes appear to be better in the hips that did not undergo shelf acetabuloplasty, although the results were good in both groups.

High hip center arthroplasty in the treatment of severe hip dysplasia: Are knee and ankle compromised?

BACKGROUND

There is limited information about the effect of hip center location on gait parameters of knee and ankle. This study aimed to compare anatomical vs. high hip center arthroplasty according to gait parameters of knee and ankle and investigate whether the high hip center has any adverse effect on these joints or not.

METHODS

20 patients who underwent unilateral total hip arthroplasty (Group 1; 10 patients with anatomical reconstruction, Group 2; 10 patients with high hip center) due to Crowe type III-IV developmental dysplasia of the hip and completed 2 years of follow-up were included. The patients were examined by 3-D gait analysis.

FINDINGS

The maximum extension of the knee on the operated side was lower in Group 2 (p = 0.044). Longitudinal knee joint force was higher in Group 2 on both operated (p = 0.041) and non-operated sides (p = 0.031). Lateral knee joint force was also higher in Group 2 (p = 0.023). No significant difference was detected in ankle parameters.

INTERPRETATION

Unilateral high hip center has been shown to restrict the dynamic knee range of motion on the operated side and increase the knee load on both sides, thus putting the knees at risk for osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective comparative study.

Bone defect map of the true acetabulum in hip dysplasia (Crowe type II and III) based on three-dimensional image reconstruction analysis

The high hip center technique (HHC) is considered to be feasible for acetabular reconstruction in patients with DDH, but there is little in-depth study of its specific impact on Crowe type II and III DDH. The purpose of this study was to simultaneously analyze the effect of HHC on bone coverage of the cup (CC) in the acetabular reconstruction of type II and III DDH patients and to propose a map of acetabular bone defects from the perspective of the cup. Forty-nine hip CT data of 39 patients with DDH (Crowe type II and III) were collected to simulate acetabular reconstruction by cup models of different sizes (diameter 38mm–50 mm, 2 mm increment) with the HHC technique. The frequency distribution was plotted by overlapping the portions of the 44 mm cups that were not covered by the host bone. The mean CC of cups with sizes of 38 mm, 40 mm, 42 mm, 44 mm, 46 mm, 48 mm, and 50 mm at the true acetabula were 77.85%, 76.71%, 75.73%, 74.56%, 73.68%, 72.51%, and 71.75%, respectively, and the maximum CC increments were 21.24%, 21.58%, 20.86%, 20.04%, 18.62%, 17.18%, and 15.42% (P < 0.001), respectively, after the cups were elevated from the true acetabula. The bone defect map shows that 95% of type II and III DDH acetabula had posterosuperior bone defects, and approximately 60% were located outside the force line of the hip joint. Acetabular cups can meet a CC of more than 70% at the true acetabulum, and approximately 60% of Crowe type II and III DDH patients can obtain satisfactory CC at the true acetabulum by using a 44-mm cup without additional operations.

Does Cup Position at the High Hip Center or Anatomic Hip Center in THA for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Result in Better Harris Hip Scores and Revision Incidence? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

One goal of THA is to restore the anatomic hip center, which can be achieved in hips with developmental dysplasia by placing cups at the level of the native acetabulum. However, this might require adjuvant procedures such as femoral shortening osteotomy. Another option is to place the cup at the high hip center, potentially reducing surgical complexity. Currently, no clear consensus exists regarding which of these cup positions might offer better functional outcomes or long-term survival.

QUESTION/PURPOSE

We performed a systematic review to determine whether (1) functional outcomes as measured by the Harris hip score, (2) revision incidence, and (3) complications that do not result in revision differ based on the position of the acetabular cup (high hip center versus anatomic hip center) in patients undergoing THA for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, including studies comparing the functional outcomes, revision incidence, and complications of primary THA in dysplastic hips with acetabular cups placed at the high hip center versus those placed at the anatomic hip center, over any time frame. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020168183) before commencement. Of 238 records, eight comparative, retrospective nonrandomized studies of interventions were eligible for our systematic review, reporting on 207 hips with cups placed at the high hip center and 268 hips with cups at the anatomic hip center. Risk of bias within eligible studies was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Due to low comparability between studies, data could not be pooled, so these studies were assessed without summary effects.

RESULTS

Six studies compared Harris hip scores, two of which favored high hip center cup placement and three of which favored anatomic hip center cup placement, although none of the differences between cohorts met the minimum clinically important difference. Five studies reliably compared revision incidence, which ranged from 2% to 9% for high hip center at 7 to 15 years and 0% to 5.9% for anatomic hip center at 6 to 16 years. Five studies reported intra- and postoperative complications, with the high hip center being associated with higher incidence of dislocation and lower incidence of neurological complications. No clear difference was observed in intraoperative complications between the high hip center and anatomic hip center.

CONCLUSION

No obvious differences could be observed in Harris hip score or revision incidence after THA for osteoarthritis secondary to DDH between cups placed at the anatomic hip center and those placed at the high hip center. Placement of the acetabular cup in the high hip center may lead to higher risk of dislocation but lower risk of neurologic complications, although no difference in intraoperative complications was observed. Surgeons should be able to achieve satisfactory functional scores and revision incidence using either technique, although they should be aware of how their choice influences hip biomechanics and the need for adjunct procedures and associated risks and operative time. These recommendations should be considered with respect to the several limitations in the studies reviewed, including the presence of serious confounding factors and selection biases, inconsistent definitions of the high hip center, variations in dysplasia severity, small sample sizes, and follow-up periods. These weaknesses should be addressed in well-designed future studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Functional and radiographical results of asymmetrically reconstructed total hip arthroplasty in patients with bilateral dysplastic arthritic hips with one hip Crowe II-III and the other Crowe IV: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The study aimed to evaluate the functional and radiographical results of asymmetrically reconstructed total hip arthroplasty in patients with bilateral dysplastic arthritic hips with one hip Crowe II–III and the other hip Crowe IV.

Materials and methods

From April 2006 to April 2019, we evaluated 23 patients who had a reconstruction of one Crowe II–III hip with high hip center (HHC) and the other Crowe IV hip at the anatomical position (H group). The radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared with those of a control group of 19 patients with bilateral dysplasia who had one Crowe IV hip and the contralateral hip both reconstructed in the anatomical position (A group). Medical records and radiographs were reviewed, and a complete follow-up was conducted for all patients.

Results

The mean vertical center of rotation (V-COR) and horizontal center of rotation (H-COR) in the H group were 30.6 ± 5.8 mm and 30.0 ± 5.5 mm, respectively. In the A group, the corresponding values were 14.0 ± 4.3 mm and 23.0 ± 2.3 mm, respectively. A significant difference was found in terms of V-COR and H-COR between the two groups, and no significant difference was shown regarding the cup inclination, abductor lever arm (ALA), ALA ratio, and leg length discrepancy (LLD). Three patients of the H group and four patients of the A group exhibited LLD > 10 mm. All seven patients who had LLD > 10 mm underwent the shortening subtrochanteric osteotomy (SSTO) of the Crowe IV hip. Subgroup analysis based on the presence and absence of SSTO showed that the LLD of the SSTO group was greater than that of the non-SSTO group in both groups, but the difference was only statistically significant in the A group. At the last follow-up, the mean Harris Hip Scores significantly improved in the two groups, and there was no revision during the follow-up period. In the H group, four patients presented with a slight limp and three patients with a moderate limp, while it was six patients and one patient in the A group, respectively.

Conclusions

Asymmetrical reconstruction in patients with bilateral dysplastic arthritic hips with one hip Crowe II–III and the other Crowe IV is acceptable and comparable when compared with bilateral anatomical reconstruction.

Level of evidence

III, retrospective observational study.

Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trail Registry. ChiCTR2000033848

Novel 3D printed integral customized acetabular prosthesis for anatomical rotation center restoration in hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip crowe type III: A Case Report

RATIONALE

Exact restoration of the rotation center in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is technically challenging in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis due to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), especially in the Crowe type II and III procedures. The technical difficulty is attributable to the complex acetabular changes. In this study, a novel 3-dimensional (3D) printed integral customized acetabular prosthesis for anatomical rotation restoration in THA for DDH Crowe type III was developed using patient-specific Computer-aided design and additive manufacturing (AM) methods.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 69-year-old female patient had developed left hip joint pain and restricted movement for 40 years; the symptoms had increased in the past 5 months. Pain, limited motion of the left hip joint, and lower limb length discrepancy were noted during physical examination.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient was diagnosed with left hip end-stage osteoarthritis secondary to DDH (Crowe type III).

INTERVENTION

A 3D printed acetabulum model was manufactured and a simulated operation was performed to improve the accuracy of reconstruction of the rotation center and bone defect. A 3D printed titanium alloy integral customized acetabular prosthesis was designed according to the result of simulated operation. The integral customized prothesis was implanted subsequently via the posterolateral approach. Radiography of the pelvis and Harris score assessment were performed during the perioperative period as well as at the 6- and 12-month follow-up.

OUTCOMES

The 3D printed integral customized acetabular prosthesis matched precisely with the reamed acetabulum. The rotation center was restored and the bone defect was exactly reconstructed. There were no signs of prosthetic loosening at the 12-month follow-up. The Harris score gradually improved during the follow-up period.

LESSONS

Satisfactory results of hip rotation restoration and bone defect reconstruction could be achieved by using 3D printed integral customized acetabular prosthesis, which provides a promising way to reconstruct the acetabulum in patients with DDH anatomically and rapidly for THA.

Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty in developmental dysplasia of hip patients

Objectives

This study aims to report the physiological and radiological long-term results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) combined with or without subtrochanteric osteotomy in a group of developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) patients.

Patients and methods

This retrospective study included 90 hips of 59 patients (3 males, 56 females; mean age 45.7±10.9 years; range, 24 to 67 years) who underwent THA between January 1979 and March 2006. Thirteen patients needed subtrochanteric shortening. The evaluation was performed through Harris hip scores, physical examination, and radiological imaging.

Results

The follow-up period ranged from 5 to 32 years, and the mean follow-up period was 10.3±6.4 years. Revision was required in 17 hips out of 90. Twelve revisions were needed because of aseptic loosening of femoral or acetabular component, three were for fracture of the femoral stem, and two for protrusio acetabuli. Four patients had transient nerve palsy, and one had permanent nerve function loss. In one patient, nonunion was observed around the femoral osteotomy site. Harris hip score was remarkably improved compared to top preoperative values (48 vs. 88.2, p<0.01).

Conclusion

Although revision rates tend to increase in long-term follow-up, THA is one of the best treatment options in DDH patients to relieve pain, improve daily activity levels, and minimize the damage of the knee and lumbar region.