The Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty With and Without Patellar Resurfacing up to 17 Years: A Report From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

Patellar resurfacing might not be mandatory in contralateral second total knee replacement even if performed during replacement of the first knee

INTRODUCTION

The appropriateness or necessity of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not clearly established. The objective of the present study was to compare the clinical and functional results of patients with bilateral involvement, operated on in one knee by TKA with patellar resurfacing and in the other knee by TKA without resurfacing. The hypothesis was that there was no difference in results between the two sides.

METHOD

This was a retrospective cohort of patients operated on by TKA without patellar resurfacing in a second osteoarthritic knee after contralateral TKA with patellar resurfacing. Twenty consecutive patients who underwent second primary TKA constituted their own control group (40 knees). Iwano scores were comparable. Mean age was 75.9±6.2years. Mean time between the two procedures was 20.6±11.9months.

RESULTS

There were no differences in SF-36, KOOS or Lille patellofemoral scores between the right and left knees. Sixty-five percent of patients were unable to differentiate the performance of their knees in activities of daily living.

CONCLUSION

The present study did not differentiate results according to patellar resurfacing, showing the limitations of resurfacing for early functional gain after primary TKA. Resurfacing might thus not be essential, even if it was performed in replacement of the first knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective cohort study.

No Difference in 10-year Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

There is continuing debate about the ideal philosophy for component alignment in TKA. However, there are limited long-term functional and radiographic data on randomized comparisons of kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We present the 10-year follow-up findings of a single-center, multisurgeon randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing these two alignment philosophies in terms of the following questions: (1) Is there a difference in PROM scores? (2) Is there a difference in survivorship free from revision or reoperation for any cause? (3) Is there a difference in survivorship free from radiographic loosening?

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients undergoing primary TKA for osteoarthritis were randomized to either the mechanical alignment (n = 50) or kinematic alignment (n = 49) group. Eligibility for the study was patients undergoing unilateral TKA for osteoarthritis who were suitable for a cruciate-retaining TKA and could undergo MRI. Patients who had previous osteotomy, coronal alignment > 15° from neutral, a fixed flexion deformity > 15°, or instability whereby constrained components were being considered were excluded. Computer navigation was used in the mechanical alignment group, and patient-specific cutting blocks were used in the kinematic alignment group. At 10 years, 86% (43) of the patients in the mechanical alignment group and 80% (39) in the kinematic alignment group were available for follow-up performed as a per-protocol analysis. The PROMs that we assessed included the Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, WOMAC, Forgotten Joint Score, and EuroQol 5-Dimension score. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess survivorship free from reoperation (any reason) and revision (change or addition of any component). A single blinded observer assessed radiographs for signs of aseptic loosening (as defined by the presence of progressive radiolucent lines in two or more zones), which was reported as survivorship free from loosening.

RESULTS

At 10 years, there was no difference in any PROM score measured between the groups. Ten-year survivorship free from revision (components removed or added) likewise did not differ between the groups (96% [95% CI 91% to 99%] for the mechanical alignment group and 91% [95% CI 83% to 99%] for the kinematic alignment group; p = 0.38). There were two revisions in the mechanical alignment group (periprosthetic fracture, deep infection) and four in the kinematic alignment group (two secondary patella resurfacings, two deep infections). There was no statistically significant difference in reoperations for any cause between the two groups. There was no difference with regard to survivorship free from loosening on radiographic review (χ2 = 1.3; p = 0.52) (progressive radiolucent lines seen at 10 years were 0% for mechanical alignment and 3% for kinematic alignment).

CONCLUSION

Like the 2-year and 5-year outcomes previously reported, 10-year follow-up for this RCT demonstrated no functional or radiographic difference in outcomes between mechanical alignment and kinematic alignment TKA. Anticipated functional benefits of kinematic alignment were not demonstrated, and revision-free survivorship at 10 years did not differ between the two groups. Given the unknown long-term impact of kinematic alignment with regard to implant position (especially tibial component varus), we must conclude that mechanical alignment remains the reference standard for TKA. We could not demonstrate any advantage to kinematic alignment at 10-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Patella is rarely resurfaced during primary total knee arthroplasty in clinical trials conducted in Greece: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to report the approach of Greek surgeons regarding patellar management and provide the outcomes and the rate of the need for secondary patella resurfacing.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were accessed in January 2024. Clinical studies evaluating the outcomes of patients undergoing primary TKA were considered eligible for this systematic review if the following predefined criteria were fulfilled: (1) published in English, (2) were conducted in Greece, and had a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The methodological quality and publication bias were assessed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) and ROBIS tool, respectively. Data was presented in tables using absolute values from individual studies. Pooled data were presented as means, ranges, and percentages.

RESULTS

Six clinical studies with a total of 1084 TKAs were included. Four studies were retrospectives, and two studies were prospective. Patella was only resurfaced in 0.6% of total TKAs. TKA without patellar resurfaced, which resulted in an improvement in functional outcome. Among studies, the overall need for revision incidence was 7.6% (68 out of 892 TKAs). Additionally, Aseptic loosening (2.4%) was the most common reason for revision due to patellofemoral joint complications, followed by secondary patellar resurfacing (2.1%) and deep infection (1.3%). The mean mCMS demonstrated a fair methodological quality level, and the ROBIS toll a low risk of bias in all four domains.

CONCLUSION

The available evidence supports that Greek surgeons mainly do not resurface the patella. However, patellar non-resurfacing yields good functional outcomes and presents relatively low revision rates for secondary patellar resurfacing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Minimum 15-Year Survival of a Biconvex Inlay Patellar Component in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 2,530 Total Knee Arthroplasties From a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

Routine patellar resurfacing during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. To our knowledge, there are no studies reporting the long-term performance of a cemented biconvex all-polyethylene inlay component implanted at the time of primary TKA. The purpose of this study was to examine the 15-year survivorship and long-term clinical outcomes of this biconvex inlay patella used at our institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected institutional database and identified 2,530 patients who underwent cemented TKA with a single prosthetic design (from 1996 to 2007) where the patella was resurfaced using this cemented biconvex inlay patella. The mean age at surgery was 68 years (range, 29 to 93). The mean body mass index was 33.0 (range, 16.4 to 76.3), with 61.9% women. At the time of analysis, the mean time from surgery was 20.4 years (range, 15 to 26). We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to calculate survivorship at 15 years. We analyzed clinical outcomes using 3 patient-reported outcome measures collected prospectively.

RESULTS

The 15-year survivorship with revision surgery for all causes as the end point was 97.1% (95% confidence interval 96.1 to 98.1%). The 15-year survivorship with revision surgery for a patella-related complication as the end point was 99.7% (95% confidence interval 99.4 to 1.0). At the final follow-up, patients showed significant improvement in scores for the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (P < .001), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (P < .001), and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey physical component (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine patellar resurfacing using a biconvex inlay patellar component has excellent survivorship and a low rate of complications at 15 years post-TKA.

Does commonly used femoral components of total knee arthroplasty fit well in the Indian population?

Background

20 % of patients remain dissatisfied post-Total Knee Arthroplasty. We intend to find the correlation between sizes of commonly used femoral components and morphometric data of distal femur in Indian population.

Materials and methods

Prospective observational study in 178 knees (178 individuals) was conducted on Magnetic Resonance Imaging scans (Axial section). The anteroposterior dimension at intercondylar notch (AP), anteroposterior dimension on the medial (MAP) and lateral (LAP) femoral condyle, total mediolateral width (ML), width of medial condyle (MLM), lateral condyle (MLL) and intercondylar distance (ICD) and aspect ratio (AR) were measured on males and females separately. These measurements were then analyzed keeping in view the available sizes of three latest knee arthroplasty systems (Attune CR, Next Gen II, Genesis II) to look for correlation and best fitting system.

Results

On observation between values of male and female femur, a significant difference was seen in all the parameters (p-value<0.0001) except ICD (p-value 0.6591). On scatter plots, Attune was found to be nearer to the line of best fit compared to other two implant companies in both males and females. Outliers were highest in cases of NextGen II (45 % in males and 46 % in females) whereas it was lowest in the case of Attune (12.5 %in males and 41 % in females).

Conclusion

Attune CR was seen to fit best in the Indian population followed by Genesis II and NextGen II. These femoral implants are designed as per the sizes of the Western population and the Caucasians are oversized for the Indian subcontinent, especially female patients, thus needing improvement in design/sizes.

Level of evidence

III.

What are the Outcomes of Secondary Patella Resurfacing for Dissatisfaction Following Primary Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 604 Knees

BACKGROUND

Secondary patella resurfacing is often performed for dissatisfaction following primary knee arthroplasty where the native patella was retained. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate outcomes of secondary patella resurfacing.

METHODS

The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting on patients who underwent secondary patella resurfacing after previous primary knee arthroplasty with retention of the native patella were considered eligible. The risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized studies tool. A random-effects model and the inverse-variance weighting method was used for meta-analysis. There were sixteen retrospective studies including 604 knees (594 patients) with a mean follow up of 42 months (range, 2 to 197).

RESULTS

An overall improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) was achieved in 53% of cases from pooled data available for 293 knees [95% Confidence Interval (CI) (0.44, 0.62), I2=68% - moderate heterogeneity]. The pooled proportion of patients satisfied with the procedure was 59% [95% CI (48, 68), I2 = 70% - moderate heterogeneity] in a sample size of 415. There was a minimal rate (2%) of complication incidence when performing secondary patella resurfacing and a pooled rate of revision surgery of 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

An improvement in pain, satisfaction, and PROMs was achieved in slightly more than half of the patients following secondary patella resurfacing. However, studies lacked standardized objective selection criteria for the procedure and the available data was predominantly retrospective, with high heterogeneity and variation in outcome reporting.

Do we need to restore patellar thickness after total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether increased patellar thickness after resurfacing decreased knee flexion angle and had any effect on functional outcomes comparing with patellar thickness restoration (patelloplasty) in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or not.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 220 patients undergoing primary TKA: 110 patients undergoing patelloplasty and 110 patients received overstuffed patellar resurfacing using subchondral bone cut at lateral facet technique were recruited. The mean increase in patellar thickness after resurfacing equal to 2 ± 1.2 mm. The outcomes were postoperative knee flexion angle and modified Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score at minimum 2 year after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative knee flexion angles were similar between overstuffed resurfacing group and patelloplasty group (132 ± 7° vs. 134 ± 8°, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 6.9-1.8°, p = 0.1). The mean increase in postoperative knee flexion was 13° in both groups (p = 0.94). The mean change of overall modified WOMAC score was also similar between the two groups (42 ± 12 vs. 39 ± 9 points, 95% CI - 1.7-9.4 points, p = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that increased patellar thickness has no effect on postoperative knee flexion angle and functional outcomes in TKA. The finding clarified the misunderstanding principle of native patellar thickness restoration after resurfacing which had made many surgeons to refrain from resurfacing especially in patient who had thin patella.

Higher failure rate of secondary patellar resurfacing following bicompartmental knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The role of secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) in anterior knee pain (AKP) is still debated in literature. A regional arthroplasty registry was investigated, aiming to: (1) assess the survival rate of SPR; and (2) compare SPR to tricompartmental TKA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The regional arthroplasty registry RIPO was investigated about all SPRs performed after bicompartmental arthroplasty. The survival rates and the reasons for revision were assessed as any other factor that could have influenced implants failure. SPR survivorship was compared to tricompartmental TKAs.

RESULTS

406 SPRs performed after bicompartmental arthroplasty were analyzed. The survival rates were 80.6% (CI 95% 75.9-84.5) at 5 years and 77.6% (CI 95% 72.4-82) at 7 years. Half of the SPRs was performed 0.9-2.4 years after the index bicompartmental arthroplasty. SPR achieved lower survival than tricompartmental TKA (80.6% vs 96.7%, p < 0.001), with an adjusted hazard ratio for failure of 5.5 (CI 95% 4.2-7.1, p < 0.001). SPRs performed within 2 years after primary implant had a significantly higher rates of failure when compared to tricompartmental TKA (HR: 6.4, CI 95% 4.8-8.4, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SPR after bicompartmental knee arthroplasty showed modest 5- and 7-year survival rates, worse than primary tricompartmental TKA. When SPRs are performed within 2 years after primary arthroplasty, a significant higher risk of failure should be expected, highlighting than appropriate pre-operative work-up and patient selection is crucial for SPR successful outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, therapeutic study.

Outcomes and Survivorships of Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Resurfaced and Unresurfaced Patellae

BACKGROUND

The decision to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. While there is some consensus that leaving the patella unresurfaced increases risk of reoperation, there is conflicting evidence about patient reported outcomes or indications for resurfacing. This study sought to determine recent rates of patellar resurfacing, examine factors affecting rates of resurfacing, and analyze the associations between patellar resurfacing and both revision rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

The American Joint Replacement Registry was used to identify primary TKAs performed for osteoarthritis between 2012 and 2021. Cases were classified as resurfaced patella and unresurfaced patella (URP). Outcomes analyzed included trends in patellar resurfacing, factors influencing rate of resurfacing, revision rates, operative time, and 2 PROMs.

RESULTS

Rates of patellar resurfacing decreased and rates of URP increased significantly faster in ambulatory surgery centers and among high volume surgeons. Operative time was significantly lower in URP versus resurfaced patella (88.15 versus 89.90 minutes). The URP were significantly more likely to require revision surgery (odds ratio = 1.206 (1.078, 1.35), P = .0011). There was no significant difference in the likelihood of achieving the minimal clinically important difference in PROMs between resurfaced and nonresurfaced TKAs at 1 year (odds ratio = 1.060 (0.710, 1.581), P = .7755).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in minimal clinically important difference between resurfaced and URPs and no clinically relevant difference in operative time. However, URPs were more likely to require revision surgery. Therefore, the decision not to resurface should be made carefully considering the known risk of revision and the uncertain benefit.

A Narrative Review of Patellar Resurfacing Versus Non-resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty

The number of individuals who experience the symptoms of gonarthrosis rises proportionally as life expectancy rises and the population becomes more active. The purpose of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to lessen pain and restore knee function, and it has a high success rate. The restoration of patellar tracking in addition to the proper alignment of the femoral and tibial components contributes to the success of the arthroplasty and the patient's happiness. Replacement of the knee is not an easy process. One of the major objectives of total knee replacement is to achieve the proper rotation of the femoral components. A critical step that affects postoperative outcomes in total knee arthroplasty is the correct alignment of the femoral component. The axial plane of the femoral component is to blame for flexion stability, knee joint kinematics, flexion alignment, and patellar tracking. The patella is the largest sesamoid bone in the human body, and its major role is to enhance the quadriceps' moment arm, which allows the knee to expand. The distribution of patellofemoral compressive pressures during knee flexion and the centralization of the quadriceps muscles' multidirectional pull during extension are both critical functions of the patella. After primary knee arthroplasty, there are 8% more cases of anterior knee discomfort than there were before. Whether or not the patella was resurfaced, patients with primary TKA experience anterior knee discomfort. Patella baja is caused by excessive joint line elevation, which causes persistent overload and discomfort. The design of the TKR might have an impact on postoperative patellofemoral problems. After TKR, patellofemoral maltracking and patellar dislocation are often caused by surgical mistakes.

Sub-optimal femoral fit in total knee arthroplasty, a systematic review of human femoral data vs off-the-shelf contemporary femoral components

PURPOSE

The purpose of the current study is to investigate the inadequacy of fit between the human distal femur and the knee implants offerings and describe the available strategies to overcome this issue.

METHODS

A systematic research of the literature was performed to identify studies reporting morphologic measures of the distal femur. Studies were excluded if they included unhealthy knees or the morphological analysis did not report the two key dimensions to identify the patient's unique anatomy: AP length and mediolateral (ML) width. Clinically relevant component overhang or underhang was considered when the metal-bone mismatch was > 3 mm as described in the literature.

RESULTS

Six studies with anthropometric analysis of 1395 distal femurs met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed that by employing the available sizes of four current "state-of-the-art" primary off-the shelf (OTS) femoral implants up to 13-41% would show underhang and 9-27% overhang clinically relevant and the introduction of narrower sizes did not reduce this percentage of underhang but improved the overhang rate of 10-15%.

CONCLUSIONS

Whenever an ML/AP mismatch in encountered in the operating room, adaptations are needed, and these bring about deleterious biomechanical and clinical complications. Therefore, this study highlights the need for implants design with multiple ML offerings per AP size, since they provide not only more sizes options but more femoral shapes to match the different ML sizes of the distal femur, compared to designs with single ML offerings for a given femoral AP dimension.

Anterior Knee Pain Following Primary Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty With Posterior-Stabilized Prosthesis and Patellar Resurfacing: Prevalence and Clinical Implications

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with patient dissatisfaction. Factors related to postoperative anterior knee pain and its impact on patient outcomes are poorly understood. The following are the aims of this study: (1) to report the prevalence of anterior knee pain before and after TKA using a posterior-stabilized prosthesis with routine patellar resurfacing; (2) to investigate the association of preoperative clinical factors with the presence of anterior knee pain after TKA; and (3) to explore the association of postoperative anterior knee pain with postoperative self-reported function and quality of life.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 506 patients who had undergone elective primary unilateral TKA with a posterior-stabilized prosthesis and patellar resurfacing. Outcome measures prior to and 12 months after TKA included self-reported anterior knee pain, knee function, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Prevalence of anterior knee pain was 72% prior to and 15% following TKA. Patients who had preoperative anterior knee pain had twice the risk of experiencing anterior knee pain after TKA than patients who did not have preoperative anterior knee pain (risk ratio: 2.37, 95% CI 1.73-2.96). Greater severity of preoperative anterior knee pain and worse self-reported function were associated with the presence of postoperative anterior knee pain (rho = 0.15, P < .01; rho = 0.13, P < .01, respectively). Preoperative age, gender, and quality of life were not associated with postoperative anterior knee pain. Greater severity of postoperative anterior knee pain was associated with worse knee function at 12 months postoperative (rho = 0.49, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

One in 7 patients reported anterior knee pain 12 months following posterior-stabilized and patella-resurfaced TKA. The presence of preoperative anterior knee pain and worse self-reported function are associated with postoperative anterior knee pain.

Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty, a Never-Ending Controversy; Case Report and Literature Review

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a lifesaving procedure for advanced gonarthrosis. However, patella resurfacing (PR) in TKA remains a controversial procedure, leading to extensive discussions amongst orthopedic surgeons, regarding its indications and results. Based on these premises, we present a clinical case of a 70-year-old Caucasian woman admitted for pain, swelling and limitation of left knee joint mobility. Her medical history records an Ahlback stage IV gonarthrosis with simultaneous bilateral TKA surgery performed in different hospital, when two NexGen cemented total prostheses were implanted with patellar resurfacing being performed only on the right side. Our clinical (American Knee Society Score, Lonner and Feller scales) and radiological evaluations (CT scan and Xray) revealed left patellar arthrosis and a slight lateral subluxation of the patella. The chosen treatment plan was revision surgery for PR and patellar prosthesis with a cemented patellar component, cross-linked polyethylene, no 32 NexGen model with 8.5 mm thickness. The immediate and distant postoperative evolution was favorable. Extensive literature review shows that, at present, PR remains at surgeon's discretion mainly based on his previous results. Therefore, we believe there is an imperative need to develop high quality studies based on accurate scientific evidence to universally establish valid guidelines for PR in TKA.

Does Choice of Patellar Implant in Total Knee Arthroplasty Matter?: A Randomized Comparative Trial of 3 Commonly Used Designs

BACKGROUND

There is currently a lack of evidence to identify the optimal patellar implant design in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to assess clinical, intraoperative, radiographic, and scintigraphic differences between inlay (IN), onlay round (OR), and onlay oval (OO) patellar implants.

METHODS

A parallel-group, double-blinded, randomized trial compared IN, OR, and OO patellar implants using the same posterior-stabilized TKA prosthesis for each. Patient outcomes were prospectively followed for a minimum of 2 years, with survivorship outcomes followed for a mean of 5 years. The primary outcome was the between-group differences in the mean Kujala score change from preoperatively to 2 years postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included differences in other knee-specific and general health outcomes, intraoperative characteristics, radiographic parameters, patellar vascularity, and implant survivorship.

RESULTS

A total of 121 participants (40 in the IN group, 41 in OR group, 40 in the OO group) were allocated to 1 of 3 implant designs. At 2 years postoperatively, there were no significant differences in Kujala score changes between groups (p = 0.7; Kruskal-Wallis test). Compared with the IN group, the OR group showed greater improvements in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living and in KOOS Quality of Life compared with the OO group. However, the OO design exhibited better bone coverage and lower lateral facetectomy rates compared with the IN and OR designs. The IN group had more lateral contact compared with the OO group (p = 0.02; Fisher exact test), but the overall value for lateral contact was not significant (p = 0.09; chi-square test). There were no differences in postoperative scintigraphic vascularity (p = 0.8; chi-square test). There was 1 revision for infection at 3 years postoperatively in the OO group, and no revision in the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patellar design did not influence patellofemoral outcomes or survivorship. However, OR implants showed improvements in some secondary patient-reported outcome measures, and OO implants exhibited superior bone coverage and improvements in several intraoperative, radiographic, and scintigraphic outcomes. These findings, combined with superior long-term implant survivorship from previous studies, add support for the use of onlay designs in TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty leads to better isokinetic performance

BACKGROUND

For decades there have been concerns about patellar resurfacing (PR) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the individual preference of the surgeon is still the main determinant of whether or not resurfacing is applied. According to preference, surgeons can be categorized in 3 main groups of those who usually, selectively, or rarely resurface. The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled study was to compare the isokinetic performance and clinical outcome of TKAs with PR and without PR.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients scheduled to undergo TKA for primary osteoarthritis of the knee were randomly assigned to either the PR or non-PR groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in respect of age, BMI, gender and preoperative Knee Society Score (KSS) and isokinetic performance. Patients were evaluated at postoperative 3, 6, and 12 months with KSS and at 6 months and 1 year with isokinetic measurements.

RESULTS

The PR group had a higher mean score, especially in the functional component of KSS, but the difference was not statistically significant. Knee extension peak torque was significantly higher in the PR group at 6 months (p = 0.029) and 1 year (p = 0.004) postoperatively. There were no significant differences between the groups in respect of knee flexion peak torque values following TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrated that PR during TKA is associated with better isokinetic performance and higher knee scores. These results support routine/usually resurfacing of the patella. For surgeons who selectively resurface the patella, the advantage of better isokinetic performance may be taking into consideration in favor of resurfacing the patella where they are undecided.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Utility of synovial calprotectin lateral flow test to exclude chronic prosthetic joint infection in periprosthetic fractures: a prospective cohort study

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) requires a combination of various clinical, laboratory, microbiological and histopathological parameters. A concomitant periprosthetic fracture (PPF) further complicates the diagnosis as it causes a confounding local inflammatory response. Synovial calprotectin has been demonstrated as a promising biomarker of PJI. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of synovial calprotectin for the pre- or intraoperative diagnosis of PJI in PFF. 30 patients with PPF and implant loosening were included in this prospective study. Synovial fluid with white blood cells and percentage of polymorphonuclear neutrophils, serum C-reactive protein, and synovial calprotectin using a lateral-flow assay were tested against the EBJIS definition with adjusted thresholds to account for the local inflammation. 14 patients were postoperatively classified as confirmed infections (ten total hip arthroplasties and fourtotal knee arthroplasties). The calprotectin assay yielded a sensitivity of 0.71 [0.48; 0.95], a specificity of 0.69 [0.46; 0.91], a positive predictive value of 0.67 [0.43; 0.91] and a negative predictive value of 0.73 [0.51; 0.96]. Calprotectin is a promising diagnostic parameter for the detection of a PJI in a PPF. The lateral flow assay offers prompt results, which may further assist the surgeon in addition to already existing parameters of PJI diagnostics to diagnose concomitant PJI in PPF during surgery.

[Digital study on the relationship between position of patellar high point and shape of osteotomy surface in Chinese]

OBJECTIVE

To measure the position of patellar high point and the shape of the osteotomy surface, and to analyze their relationship, distribution, and gender differences.

METHODS

A total of 127 patients who needed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or meniscus repair due to trauma between September 2020 and September 2021 were selected as the research subjects. There were 71 males and 56 females, with an average age of 30.5 years (range, 19-43 years). There were significant differences in height and body weight between male and female patients ( P<0.05), but no significant difference in age and body mass index ( P>0.05). The three-dimensional model of the patella was reconstructed in Mimics software based on the CT images of the knee joint, and then imported into Geomagic Studio software for virtual osteotomy of the patella. The horizontal axis and vertical axis of the osteotomy surface represented the total width (W) and total height (H) of the osteotomy surface, respectively. Then the osteotomy surface was divided into four quadrants with the two axes: inner proximal, inner distal, outer proximal, and outer distal, and the inner width (W1), proximal height (H1), outer width (W2), and distal height (H2) were measured. The midpoint of the patellar ridge was selected as the patellar high point, and the point projected onto the osteotomy surface was defined as the optimal point for patellar prosthesis positioning (OPPP). The distances of OPPP on the horizontal axis (L1) and vertical axis (L2) relative to the center of the osteotomy surface were measured and L1/W1 and L2/H1 were also calculated; the quadrant distribution of OPPP was recorded. The patients were grouped according to gender, and the morphological parameters of the osteotomy surface (W, W1, W2, H, H1, H2) and the parameters related to the position of the OPPP (L1, L2, L1/W1, L2/H1) were analyzed between groups.

RESULTS

The width and height of each osteotomy surface of the patella in males were significantly larger than those in females ( P<0.05). As for the relationship between OPPP and osteotomy surface, the L1 of both male and female patients was 1-7 mm, and there was no significant difference in the distribution between the two groups ( χ ²=8.068, P=0.149); L1/W1 in both male and female patients was mainly 1/10-3/10. The L2 of male patients was 0-5 mm, and that of female patients was -1-4 mm; the difference in distribution between the two groups was significant ( χ ²=15.500, P=0.006); L2/H1 in both male and female patients was mainly 0-1/5. The OPPP of male patients was mainly distributed in the inner proximal (98.59%) and outer proximal (1.41%) quadrants, while the female patients were distributed in the inner proximal (91.07%), inner distal (7.14%), and outer proximal (1.79%) quadrants. There was significant difference in the OPPP quadrant distribution between the two groups ( χ ²=5.186, P=0.036).

CONCLUSION

The OPPP points are widely distributed but mainly concentrated on around 1/5 of the medial patella surface and around 1/10 of the superior patella surface. A small portion of females' OPPP were inferior while all males' OPPP were superior to the center of the patella.

The Journey Bicruciate Knee Replacement: Design Modifications Yield Better Early Functional Results and Reduce Complications

The Journey-I total knee replacement was designed to improve knee kinematics but had several complications including early dislocation. The Journey-II modification was introduced to reduce these while maintaining high function. To assess whether the modified Journey-II prosthesis has succeeded in its designers aims, we undertook an observational study of prospectively recorded data to analyze and compare the two knees. A total of 217 Journey-I and 129 Journey-II knees were identified from the department's prospectively collated registry and were assessed at 1 year by a comparative statistical analysis using numerous factors including pain, functional activity, physical assessment, Short Form-12 (SF-12), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and Oxford scores. The statistical tests included Chi-square, Wilcoxon's rank and Mann-Whitney U-tests with the level of significance set at p < 0.05. There was a variation in primary patella resurfacing between the two groups with 14.3% in the Journey-I cohort and 66.7% in the Journey-II cohort. Both replacements demonstrated excellent postoperative function, but the Journey II performed significantly better than Journey I with fewer complications (37 vs. 10) and better improvement in almost all clinical scores including pain (p < 0.01), mobility outcomes (p = 0.018), Oxford (p = 0.004), and WOMAC (p = 0.039) scores but not with flexion improvement and SF-12 score. There was significant improvement in patellofemoral pain postoperatively in both the Journey I (p = 0.011) and Journey II (p = 0.042) arthroplasty; however the primarily resurfaced patella in a Journey-II implant had better postoperative scores. The main complication of dislocation in the Journey I was not seen in the modified Journey-II implant with stiffness requiring intervention reduced in Journey II. These results suggest that the Journey II has improved short-term clinical outcomes compared with Journey I with reduction of dislocation and other complications.

Patella related problems as common reason for revision of NexGen PS® total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing: An analysis of 5911 primary total knee arthroplasties registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register

BACKGROUND

Patella resurfacing remains controversial in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).The aim of this study was to investigate if there was a difference in revision rate and reason for revision within 8 years after single brand primary cemented TKA with or without patella resurfacing, using data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

METHODS

All primary TKA surgeries with a posterior stabilized cemented primary NexGen®, between 2010 and 2013 with diagnosis osteoarthritis were analyzed (n = 5911). Multivariate cox regression analyses were performed to analyze differences in revision rate between TKA with or without patella component, and was adjusted for age and previous surgery.

RESULTS

Of 5911 TKA surgeries, 4795 were performed without patella resurfacing (81.1%) and 1116 with patella resurfacing (18.9%). There was a significant difference in patellar problems as reason for revision between patients after primary TKA with patella resurfacing (9.3%) and without patella resurfacing (29.9%) (p = 0.01). This was mostly caused by patellar pain (28.0%). There was no significant difference in cumulative revision rate within between TKA with patella resurfacing and without patella resurfacing.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, 30% of patients who need revision surgery after TKA using NexGen® PS without patella resurfacing the reason for revision is patella related problems, compared to 9% after TKA NexGen® PS with patella resurfacing. There was no difference in cumulative incidence of revision after primary surgery of all TKA's using NexGen® PS with or without patella. To reduce the probability of reoperation for patella related problems, our data suggest the patella should be resurface during primary TKA.

Chondrocalcinosis does not affect functional outcome and prosthesis survival in patients after total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

PURPOSE

There are contentious data about the role calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystals and chondrocalcinosis (CC) play in the progression of osteoarthritis (OA), as well as in the outcomes after knee arthroplasty. Hence, the purpose of this systematic review was to analyse the clinical and functional outcome, progression of OA and prosthesis survivorship after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with CC compared to patients without CC.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature in PubMed, Medline, Embase and Web of Science was performed using the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis" (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles which reported the outcome and survival rates of prosthesis after TKA or UKA in patients with CC were included.

RESULTS

A total of 3718 patient knees were included in eight selected publications, with a median sample sizes of 234 knees (range 78-1000) and 954 knees (range 408-1500) for publications including UKA and TKA, respectively. At time of surgery, the mean age was 69 years and the prevalence for CC ranged from 12.6 to 36%. Chondrocalcinosis did not significantly influence the functional and clinical outcome, the implant survival as well as the radiologic progression of OA disease after UKA and TKA.

CONCLUSION

The presence of CPP crystals in tissue samples, synovial fluid or evidence of calcifications on preoperative radiographs did not significantly influence the postoperative functional and activity scores. It also had no significant influence on prosthesis survival rate, whether it was a UKA or a TKA. This study shows that the impact of a subclinical form of chondrocalcinosis may not be of clinical relevance in the context of arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Patellar management during total knee arthroplasty: a review

The optimal management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial and surgeons tend to approach the patella with one of three general mindsets: always resurface the patella, never resurface the patella, or selectively resurface the patella based on specific patient or patellar criteria.

Studies comparing resurfacing and non-resurfacing of the patella during TKA have reported inconsistent and contradictory findings.

When resurfacing the patella is chosen, there are a number of available patellar component designs, materials, and techniques for cutting and fixation.

When patellar non-resurfacing is chosen, several alternatives are available, including patellar denervation, lateral retinacular release, and patelloplasty. Surgeons may choose to perform any of these alone, or together in some combination.

Prospective randomized studies are needed to better understand which patellar management techniques contribute to superior postoperative outcomes. Until then, this remains a controversial topic, and options for patellar management will need to be weighed on an individual basis per patient.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:861-871. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200156

Radiographic evaluation of patellofemoral alignment in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty: A comparative study with mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA), in which femoral component is placed 3-5° of internal rotation relative to mechanically aligned (MA)-TKA, may have a potential risk of patellofemoral malalignment. This study aimed to assess patellofemoral alignment and compare the data between KA-TKA and MA-TKA, and the relationship with patellofemoral radiographic parameters and patient reported outcomes.

METHODS

Among patients who underwent TKA in 2015 and 2016 in our institute, 28 KA-TKAs with a metal-backed patellar component were retrospectively assessed for patellofemoral alignment, and 28 MA-TKAs with a metal-backed patellar component served as controls. A year postoperatively, patellar tilt and shift at 30°, 60°, and 90° knee flexion were measured on Merchant views and compared between the two TKAs. Implant positioning in each patient was assessed based on preoperative CT images and correlations of femoral component positioning with patellar tilt/shift were assessed.

RESULTS

Patellar shift at 30° flexion was significantly greater in KA-TKA than in MA-TKA (p = 0.04), whereas patellar tilt angle was comparable between the two TKAs. No statistical correlation was evident between femoral component positioning and patellar shift/tilt, regardless of knee flexion angle in the two TKAs. Knee Society Score 2011 at 1 year follow-up was comparable in all subcategories between the two TKAs.

CONCLUSION

Radiographic analysis of KA-TKA revealed lateral shift of the patella at 30° knee flexion at 1 year postoperatively, however patients with patellar shift were asymptomatic. Further long-term observation is required to examine the impact of KA-TKA on the patellofemoral complication.

Onlay Patellar Resurfacing in a Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Increases Patellar Crepitus Complication: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Patellar crepitus (PC) is a potentially problematic complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) more commonly occurring with a posterior-stabilized (PS) prosthesis. Patellar resurfacing has been reported to reduce PC complications; however, no study has compared the PC complication rates between 2 different resurfacing techniques, namely inlay and onlay.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the PC complication between inlay and onlay patellar resurfacing techniques. A total of 222 patients who underwent unilateral TKA using a Legion PS Total Knee System were randomized into 2 groups. PC incidence, time of PC presentation, radiographic parameters associated with PC development, and clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

PC occurred significantly more in the onlay group (17.9% vs 6.5%, P = .009). Time of PC presentation in both groups was not different. Anterior knee pain was found in 11.5% of PC patients, and none required any surgical procedure. Postoperative radiographic parameters, range of motion, Knee Society score, Oxford score, patellar score, incidence and intensity of anterior knee pain, and visual analog scale of overall knee pain were not significantly different between the 2 groups during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

To reduce the chance of PC development, we suggest an inlay patellar resurfacing technique during PS-TKA with this knee system.

Management of the Patella During Total Knee Arthroplasty

»

The optimal management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial topic with no consensus.

»

Patellar management techniques during TKA include patellar retention or resurfacing with or without patellaplasty, as well as circumferential denervation and partial lateral facetectomy (PLF).

»

Special considerations such as patient age, etiology of disease, implant design, and surgeon preference should be accounted for when determining optimal management.

»

We recommend that most patellae be circumferentially denervated, regardless of whether they are resurfaced, as the potential benefits outweigh the small associated risks.

»

Evidence demonstrates improved functional outcomes with the addition of PLF to nonresurfaced patellae. There is currently a paucity of evidence of this technique with respect to resurfaced patellae.

»

Patellar resurfacing adds additional costs and health-care resources that should be considered in the decision-making process.

Evaluating the "Patella-Friendly" Concept in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 15-Year Follow-Up Outcome Study Comparing Constant Radius, Multiradius Cruciate-Retaining, and Nonanatomical Cruciate-Retaining Implants

BACKGROUND

Patella-friendly femoral components were developed in order to reduce anterior knee pain and patellofemoral complications in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but their effect on long-term outcome is still unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated prospectively collected data from 3 groups consisting of 100 patients (100 knees in each). In group A, the constant radius a-MP, in group B the multiradius cruciate-retaining Genesis II, and in group C the nonanatomic, multiradius, cruciate-retaining AGC TKA was implanted. Patients of all groups were matched for age, gender, side, body mass index, and length of follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcome data in the form of Knee Society System (KSS), Short Form-12, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, and Oxford Knee Score were available at regular intervals for groups A and B. For patients of group C, KSS score data were available at the same time intervals. In all groups, the patellofemoral compartment was assessed using the Clinical Patella Score scale. Anterior knee pain, secondary patella resurfacing, implant failure, and radiological outcome were assessed in patients of all groups.

RESULTS

At 10-year and 15-year follow-up, patients of group A showed statistically significant (s.s.) higher (all P = .000) KSS values as compared to those of groups B and C. At 15-year follow-up, patients of group B showed s.s. higher (P = .001) KSS values as compared to those of group C. At 10-year and 15-year follow up, patients of group A showed s.s. higher (all P = .00) Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index and Oxford Knee Score values as compared to those of group B. At 15-year follow-up only, patients of group A showed s.s. higher (P = .00) Short Form-12 (physical) values as compared to those of group B. In terms of Clinical Patella Score, patients in group A had s.s. higher values (P = .05) when compared to those of groups B and C. Anterior knee pain was recorded in 4.4% of TKAs in group A, 7.5% in group B, and 17.2% in group C. One (1.1%) patient in group A, 3 (3.25%) in group B, and 7 (8%) in group C underwent secondary resurfacing.

CONCLUSION

Anatomical, patella-friendly, constant radius femoral components outperform others in reducing anterior knee pain and patella complications in TKA in which the patellae are left nonresurfaced.

Patellar Denervation Reduces Postoperative Anterior Knee Pain After Patellar Resurfacing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The benefit of patellar denervation (PD) in patellar resurfacing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still debatable. This prospective, randomized controlled trial investigated whether circumferential PD should be performed in patellar resurfacing TKA.

METHODS

A total of 241 patients who underwent unilateral TKA were randomized into PD or non-PD groups. Incidence, intensity, and presentation time of anterior knee pain (AKP) and clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The incidence of AKP was significantly lower in the PD group (6.4% vs 16.2%, P = .032). The intensity of AKP and patient satisfaction scores were significantly better in the PD group at 3 months but not after 3 months. The presentation time of AKP mostly occurs at 3 months after surgery. The Knee Society score, range of motion, Oxford score, patellar score, activity of daily living score, and visual analog scale of overall knee pain were not significantly different between the two groups during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Given that PD can improve AKP and patient satisfaction at an early period postoperatively without jeopardizing clinical outcomes at no additional cost, this inexpensive procedure readily available in nearly every operation room is strongly recommended during primary TKA with patellar resurfacing.

Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: A multifactorial analysis

PURPOSE

Dissatisfaction and an impaired quality of life after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often associated with postsurgical anterior knee pain (AKP). The underlying pathological mechanisms are not yet fully understood. Therefore, a multifactorial approach encompassing clinical and radiological parameters seemed reasonable and promising to investigate postsurgical AKP.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 25 patients without and 25 patients with postsurgical AKP after unilateral TKA were randomly recruited from a larger cohort of patients. Multiple clinical and radiological parameters-including real-time shear wave elastography (SWE) to measure the patellar and quadriceps tendon elasticity-were acquired and subsequently associated with AKP. For statistical analysis, SPSS (IBM, version 25) was used.

RESULTS

In total 50 participants (58.0% men, mean age 63.42 years, mean body mass index 29.75 kg/m²), having different prosthetic designs implanted, were included. Independently of key covariates, the strength of the quadriceps muscle (p = 0.021), a thinner inlay (p = 0.041), and a lower position of the patella (p = 0.041) were associated with AKP. Although no correlation with AKP was found (p = 0.346, resp. p = 0.154), we observed significantly decreased Young's modulus of the patellar and quadriceps tendons for the involved knee compared to the uninvolved knee (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, quadriceps muscle strength, inlay thickness, and the patella position might be of particular relevance in avoiding postsurgical AKP. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to clarify the impact of quadriceps muscle strength and the postoperative patella position as well as the role of SWE as a personalized modifiable prediction marker.

Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Whether resurface the patella or not in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was controversial. In 2013, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RTCs). After that, plenty of studies have been carried out, but there still existed a great deal of controversy. In order to update our previous study, we conducted this update meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of patellar resurfacing in TKA.

METHODS

Databases were searched for RCTs comparing the outcomes of patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in TKA. Outcomes of knee relevant indicators were analysed. To see the short- and long-term effects, we calculated the data in total and divided the patients who were followed up for ≤ 3 years and ≥ 5 years into two subgroups as well.

RESULTS

Thirty-two trials assessing 6887 knees were eligible. There was a significant difference in terms of reoperation (in total and ≥ 5 years), Knee Society Score (KSS), function score (in total and ≥ 5 years) and noise. While no significant difference was found in the following items: reoperation (≤ 3 years), anterior knee pain (AKP), function score (≤ 3 years), range of motion (ROM), Oxford score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analogue score (VAS), Feller score, patellar tilt and the patients' satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that patellar resurfacing could reduce the occurrence of reoperation and noise after surgery, as well as increase the KSS and function score, while it might not influence the outcomes such as AKP, ROM, Oxford score, KOOS, VAS, Feller score, patellar tilt and the patients' satisfaction. The results are different from our previous finding in the meta-analysis. In conclusion, we prefer patellar resurfacing in TKA.

Treatment options in PJI - is two-stage still gold standard?

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful treatment for osteoarthritis with good clinical outcomes 1,2. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in TKA has a low incidence between 0.5 and 3% but it is nevertheless one of the most dreadful complications 3-6. Two-staged revisions are considered to be the gold standard for revision in chronic PJI with infection eradication rates of over 90% 7. Recently, similar infection eradication rates after one-staged revision arthroplasty have been reported 8-10, raising the question whether the two-staged approach can still be considered the gold standard. We therefore performed a literature review to analyse the correlation of one-staged and two-staged TKA revisions with recurrent infection rates and functional outcomes. Studies concerning PJI treated by one- or two-staged revision published between 2000 and 2020 were retrieved by searching the databases PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 29 studies were included in this qualitative synthesis. Mean follow-up was at 4.9 ± 2.6 years. The mean infection eradication rate after one-staged revision vs. two-staged revision in TKA was 87 ± 8.8% vs. 83 ± 11.7%. The functional outcome measured by the mean Knee Society Score (KSS) of one-staged revision vs. two-staged revision in TKA was 80 ± 5.9 vs. 80 ± 3.9 points. One-staged revision arthroplasty in TKA appears to have similar infection eradication rates and functional outcomes compared to two-staged revision arthroplasty. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, since selection bias may have played a significant role. Several criteria to guide the surgeon in selecting the appropriate procedure have been described, but the current recommendations are based on poor evidence as randomized controlled trials are lacking 11,12. Two-staged revision remains a successful treatment option which is rightly the gold standard. However, there is a variety of cases in which one-staged revision is a viable alternative, where similar success rates and functional outcome can be expected 7,13.

Characteristics of three different patellar implant designs in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Despite debate over the role of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty, many surgeons feel it decreases re-operation rates and anterior pain, and an increasing number are adopting resurfacing. This study compares intra-operative characteristics of different patellar implants to assist surgeons in gaining better understanding of these implants.

METHODS

The three most commonly used patellar implants (inset, onlay round and onlay oval) were allocated randomly to 120 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. We compared the groups in terms of implant size, bone coverage, lateral underhang (uncovered lateral facet) and need for partial lateral facetectomy. We also compared the patient-reported outcome measures between the groups at 6 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

The inset, onlay round and onlay oval designs had bone coverage of 48.5%, 65.9% and 85.9%, respectively (P < 0.01). Similarly, the onlay-oval implant was found to have the smallest lateral underhang of all three designs (inset 11.6 mm; onlay round 6.9 mm, onlay oval 1.6 mm, P < 0.01). The onlay-oval design was the largest implant with a median size of 35 mm, compared to 23 mm for the inset and 32 mm for the onlay round (P < 0.01). In addition, patellae using onlay-oval implants required significantly fewer lateral facetectomies due to improved bone coverage (inset 95%; onlay round 87%; onlay oval 3%; P < 0.01). Finally, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures between the groups showed no difference at an early assessment of 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Onlay-oval design allows for the use of a larger implant, improving bone coverage and reducing the need for partial lateral facetectomy; however, early assessment of outcomes shows no difference between the three designs.