Curved Intertrochanteric Varus Osteotomy vs Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head in Patients Under 50 Years Old

Spherical varus rotational osteotomy of the femur using a navigation system as extra-articular surgery for extensive osteonecrosis of femoral head: a case control study

BACKGROUND

Curved varus osteotomy (CVO) is an effective femoral head-preserving surgical procedure for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) classified as type B or C1 according to the Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification; it reportedly provides better postoperative outcomes than transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy (TRO). We have developed a new procedure called spherical varus rotational osteotomy (SVRO) in which osteotomy of the femur into a spherical shape is followed by varus and anterior rotation using navigation to increase indications and improve postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Nine joints of eight patients who underwent SVRO and could be followed up for > 1 year were included in the study. Disease types determined preoperatively according to the JIC classification were type C1 for four joints and type C2 for five joints. Preoperative disease JIC classification stages were 3a for eight joints and 1 for one joint. SVRO was performed using OrthoMap® 3D Navigation software, and the following variables were measured: surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, difference between preoperative and postoperative angles of anteversion, postoperative lower limb length discrepancy, and postoperative intact area occupancy. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ) was used for clinical evaluation. Visual Analog Scale and JHEQ scores were evaluated preoperatively and at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

The measurement results were as follows: surgery time, 130 min; blood loss, 200 ml; angle of varus, 20°; angle of anterior rotation, 30°; preoperative angle of anteversion, 15°; postoperative angle of anteversion, 22°; lower limb shortening, 11 mm; preoperative intact area occupancy, 0%; and postoperative intact area occupancy, 74.2%. There were no cases of progression in the postoperative stages or re-collapse.

CONCLUSION

SVRO allows for the repositioning of the exterior and posterior intact areas, providing a broader intact region postoperatively. This technique is particularly beneficial for young patients with ONFH and extensive necrosis and is a less invasive alternative to TRO. This procedure has been shown to be effective in achieving favorable outcomes in patients with extensive necrosis who would have otherwise required rotational osteotomy, depending on the necrosis location. Further longitudinal studies are necessary to validate these findings and establish long-term benefits.

Joint-preserving effect and patient-reported outcomes of transtrochanteric curved varus osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the hip survival rate and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of transtrochanteric curved varus osteotomy (CVO) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) compared with those of conservative management.

METHODS

The CVO group comprised 32 consecutive patients (39 hips) who underwent CVO for ONFH between 2000 and 2011. The conservative group consisted of 36 consecutive patients (37 hips) who were managed conservatively for at least 1 year after collapse and who had ONFH classified by the Japanese Investigation Committee of Health and Welfare as type B or C1, for which CVO is indicated. Kaplan-Meier analysis of hip survival used any ONFH-related therapeutic surgery as the endpoint. PROMs were evaluated for all patients with surviving hips and radiographs available at the latest follow-up.

RESULT

The 10-year hip survival rate in the CVO group was 86.7%, which was significantly higher than the 51.0% 5-year survival rate in the conservative group (p < 0.0001). The Oxford Hip Score and UCLA Activity Score were significantly better in the CVO group without joint space narrowing than in the conservative group, with no significant differences between the CVO group with joint space narrowing and the conservative group.

CONCLUSION

CVO could preserve hip joints more effectively than conservative follow-up after collapse, although the presence of joint space narrowing could reduce satisfaction levels even in patients with long-term hip survival.

Systematic analysis of hip-preserving treatment for early osteonecrosis of the femoral head from the perspective of bibliometrics (2010-2023)

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a serious condition that causes bone tissue death, femoral head collapse, and hip joint destruction. Early intervention through hip-preserving treatment is crucial to slow down disease progression, preserve hip joint function, and improve the quality of life of patients. We analyzed the knowledge map, research gaps, and future research directions in the field of hip-preserving treatment for early ONFH.

METHODS

All publications related to hip-preserving treatment for early ONFH published between 2010 and 2023 were identified from the Web of Science Core Collection and analyzed using VOSviewer 1.6.19, CiteSpace 6.2.R2, and Scimago Graphica 1.0.35.

RESULTS

In total, 234 articles were analyzed. The results showed an exponential growth trend in the number of publications related to hip-preserving treatment for early ONFH in the past decade. China and the USA were the main contributors. International Orthopaedics published the most papers in this field, whereas Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume had the highest average citation count per article. Several stable research topics were noted in this field, including core decompression (CD), osteotomy, bone transplantation in hip-preserving surgery, and cell therapy, which have become research hotspots in hip-preserving treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip-preserving treatment for early ONFH has received increasing attention, and research in this field is expected to grow. Stable research topics include core decompression (CD), osteotomy, bone transplantation, and cell therapy. Future research is predicted to focus on cell therapy and combination therapy, resulting in an increasing number of publications on hip-preserving treatment for early ONFH.

Intertrochanteric curved varus osteotomy for subchondral fracture of the femoral head: a case series

Although favorable results have been reported with total hip arthroplasty, joint-preserving treatment should be the first choice for subchondral fracture of the femoral head (SFF) in young patients. This study reviewed four young male patients with SFF who underwent intertrochanteric curved varus osteotomy (CVO). The patients had a mean age of 32.3 years (range: 18-49 years). Conservative treatment was initially attempted in all cases, but failed to alleviate the pain, leading to surgical intervention at an average time of 6 months (range: 4-10 months) after symptom onset. As the fracture sites were located medial to the lateral edge of the acetabulum in all cases, CVO was performed to achieve a postoperative intact ratio of ≥ 34% in the weight-bearing region of the femoral head. The average follow-up period after surgery lasted 4.3 years (range: 2-7 years). Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed pre- and postoperatively. At the latest follow-up, the mean Harris hip score improved from 67.3 preoperatively to 99.5 postoperatively. The average preoperative intact ratio of the weight-bearing region of the femoral head was 12.3%, which increased to 44.3% postoperatively. No progression to femoral head collapse or joint space narrowing was observed on the plain radiographs. CVO is a simple, less-invasive, and beneficial approach for treating SFF in young patients whose fractures occur medial to the lateral edge of the acetabulum.

A review and meta-analysis of the survival rate of adult with osteonecrosis of the femoral head treated with transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a progressive disease, and transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy (TRO) is a promising option to treat hip preservation. Compared with outcomes of non-Asian patients, those of Asian patients are different. Once ONFH has progressed to the stage of collapse, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an unavoidable surgical procedure. However, patients treated with TRO still have a certain rate of femoral head collapse. A meta-analysis was done to comprehensively understand the outcome of TRO surgery for ONFH, in which conversion to THA was used as an endpoint event or the survival rate of patients with ONFH after TRO surgery as an indicator.

METHODS

We retrieved electronic databases from the inception of the study until June 2022, using the survival rate after TRO surgery or that after conversion to the endpoint event of THA as the effect indicator. The Risk Difference Independent unmatched samples of counting information with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to calculate the outcome. Also, subgroup analysis was carried out for Asian and non-Asian patients. Heterogeneity and publication bias analyses were also done for the included studies.

RESULTS

We pooled 19 studies, all of which were about applying TRO procedure for ONFH. There were 15 cohort studies, 4 case-control studies, and no randomized controlled studies. Based on the information extracted from the reported above (we extracted the relevant independent effect values separately for the case-control studies), this meta-analysis was performed based on a fixed-effect model, and META analysis was performed for an independent unpaired group of the samples. The total hip survival rate after TRO in ONFH was 0.58(95% CI = 0.45-0.72), The survival rate for Asians was: 0.68 (95% CI = 0.51-0.85) and for non-Asians was: 0.41 (95% CI = 0.17-0.64), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of TRO surgery in ONFH can effectively relieve patients' symptoms and they enjoy n a high survival rate, especially for Asian patients. This makes it a promising surgical technique.

Effect of trochanter displacement on impingement and bone contact in total hip arthroplasty performed after curved intertrochanteric varus osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a simulation study

Background

Curved intertrochanteric varus osteotomy (CVO) is a useful treatment option for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, the effect of proximal femoral deformity in cases of CVO converted to total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of trochanter displacement on impingement and the contact state of the implant and femur in THA.

Methods

Thirty-eight hips that had undergone CVO for ONFH were reviewed and compared with a control group of 30 contralateral hips that had not undergone surgery. The range of motion (ROM) and impingement patterns and the percentage of cortical bone in the stem placement within the femur were measured by simulation using CT-based three-dimensional template software. We also measured the ROM and the number of joints that achieved the ROM required for activities of daily living when the upward displaced apex of the greater trochanter with osteotomy was resected and compared the findings with those obtained when the apex was not resected.

Results

The CVO group showed a significantly greater bony impingement in external rotation (68.4% vs. 43.3%, p = 0.033) and abduction (78.9% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001) than in the control group. The CVO group showed a significantly smaller range of external rotation (19.0° [interquartile range; 4.0–28.8] vs. 38.0° [interquartile range; 36.0–41.8], p < 0.001) and abduction (23.0° [interquartile range; 8.5–38.8] vs. 56.0° [interquartile range; 50.3–60.0], p < 0.001) than in the control group. Significantly more joints achieved the ROM necessary for activities of daily living when the apex was resected than when it was not (10.5% vs. 63.2%, p < 0.001). The percentage of cortical bone in the stem placement position was significantly higher in the CVO group than in the control group in the proximal portion of the stem (25.5% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In cases requiring conversion to THA, we recommend resecting the upward displaced apex to achieve a sufficient ROM and carefully resecting the bone to avoid malignment of the stem.

Hip preserving procedures for osteonecrosis of the femoral head after collapse

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) affects mainly young patients and causes secondary hip osteoarthritis if remains untreated. Several operative treatments have been introduced with successful outcomes in the early stages. However, in late stages of ONFH treatment may be challenging due to the progressive nature of disease and many surgeons prefer arthroplasty option after collapse. Considering the size, age and etiology an effort should be made to preserve hip joint selected patients with early collapse or minimal arthritic changes. The purpose of the current review is to discuss the results of joint preserving procedures for late stages of ONFH.

Biomechanical effect of intertrochanteric curved varus osteotomy on stress reduction in femoral head osteonecrosis: a finite element analysis

Background

Intertrochanteric curved varus osteotomy (CVO) has been widely used to remove the necrotic bone away from the weight-bearing portion in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, whether all types of necrosis will benefit from CVO, in terms of the stress level, the effect of different center-edge (CE) angles of acetabulum on stress distribution of necrosis after CVO, and the relationship between the intact ratio and the stress of necrosis, has never been addressed. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of CVO on the stress reduction in necrotic bone using a finite element analysis (FEA) with different CE angles.

Methods

CVO finite element models of the hip joint were simulated with a lesion of 60°. The osteotomy angles were divided into four configurations (15°, 20°, 25°, and 30°), and three types (A, B, and C1) of lesions were established based on the Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification. In addition, two CE angles (18° and 33°) of acetabulum were considered. The maximum and mean von Mises stress were analyzed in terms of the necrotic bone by a physiological loading condition. Moreover, the correlation of the intact ratio measured in 3D and the stress distribution after CVO was analyzed.

Results

Stress reduction was obtained after CVO. For type B, the CVO angle was 20° (0.61 MPa), and for type C1, the CVO angle was 30° (0.77 MPa), if the mean stress level was close to type A (0.61 MPa), as a standard. The maximum and mean von Mises stress were higher in the CE angle of 18°models, respectively. The intact ratio measured in 3D had a good negative correlation with stress after CVO and had more influence on stress distribution in comparison to other geometric parameters.

Conclusions

For making decisions about the biomechanics of CVO, a CVO angle of > 20° was recommended for type B and > 30° was safe for type C1. The risk of progressive collapse was increased in the insufficient situation of the weight-bearing portion after CVO. The intact ratio could provide information about clinical outcomes and stress distribution after CVO.

Long-term outcomes of curved intertrochanteric varus osteotomy combined with bone impaction grafting for non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head

AIMS

We compared the clinical outcomes of curved intertrochanteric varus osteotomy (CVO) with bone impaction grafting (BIG) with CVO alone for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).

METHODS

This retrospective comparative study included 81 patients with ONFH; 37 patients (40 hips) underwent CVO with BIG (BIG group) and 44 patients (47 hips) underwent CVO alone (CVO group). Patients in the BIG group were followed-up for a mean of 12.2 years (10.0 to 16.5). Patients in the CVO group were followed-up for a mean of 14.5 years (10.0 to 21.0). Assessment parameters included the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip-Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), complication rates, and survival rates, with conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and radiological failure as the endpoints.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative HHS or postoperative OHS and JHEQ between the BIG group and the CVO group. Complication rates were comparable between groups. Ten-year survival rates with conversion to THA and radiological failure as the endpoints were not significantly different between groups. Successful CVO (postoperative coverage ratio of more than one-third) exhibited better ten-year survival rates with radiological failure as the endpoint in the BIG group (91.4%) than in the CVO group (77.7%), but this difference was not significant (p = 0.079).

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcomes of CVO with BIG were favourable when proper patient selection and accurate surgery are performed. However, this study did not show improvements in treatment results with the concomitant use of BIG. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):665-671.