A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Medial Stabilized Total Knee Prosthesis to a Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Design: A Report of the Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following Total Knee Replacement

Survivorship and Patient Outcomes of Conforming Bearings in Modern Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Mean 3.5 Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

The use of conforming and congruent bearings in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have rapidly increased due to the benefits of increased stability and the potential for replicating normal knee kinematics. However, limited data exist for these newly available bearings. This study evaluated revision-free survivorship and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a large granular database of primary TKAs using a single conforming bearing design.

METHODS

A total of 1,306 consecutive primary TKAs performed using a single conforming bearing design (85% cemented and 15% cementless) were retrospectively reviewed. Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimates were calculated based on the latest clinical follow-up. The PROMs and minimal clinically important differences were evaluated. A total of 93% of cases achieved minimum 1-year clinical follow-up (mean 3.5 years; range, 1 to 7), with a subset of 261 cases that achieved minimum 5-year follow-up (mean 5.8 years; range, 5 to 7).

RESULTS

All-cause and aseptic Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimates were 97.6 (95% CI [confidence interval], 97 to 99) and 98.1% (95% CI, 97 to 99) at 7.0 years. Revision-free survivorship did not differ by cemented or cementless fixation (98 versus 97%, P = .163). All PROM scores significantly improved from preoperative baseline (P < .001), and ≥ 86% of patients achieved minimal clinically important differences for Knee Society pain and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement total scores. A total of 89% of cases reported their knees to 'sometimes or always' feel normal. For cases with minimum 5-year PROMs, 93% were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied.'

CONCLUSIONS

Conforming-bearing TKA demonstrated excellent survivorship up to 7.0 years. In addition, PROMs were comparable to other designs reported in the literature. While mid-term (mean 3.5-year) results are promising, long-term data are warranted on survivorship due to potential polyethylene wear in conforming bearings with more surface area in contact with articulating surfaces.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Patient Selection in Randomized Controlled Trials of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Assessing Inclusion Criteria

BACKGROUND

Patients undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at widely disparate stages of osteoarthritis, raising the possibility of high heterogeneity among patients enrolled in TKA research studies. Obscuration of treatment effectiveness and other problems that may stem from cohort heterogeneity can be controlled in clinical studies by rigorously defining target patients. The purpose of this review was to determine the extent to which randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on TKA use osteoarthritis severity, as defined by radiographic grade or patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), in their inclusion criteria, and to investigate potential impact on outcome.

METHODS

A search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases used a combination of terms involving TKA, PROMs, and radiographic scoring. A total of 1,227 studies were independently reviewed by 2 screeners for the above terms. RCTs with ≥100 patients (236) and with <100 patients (325) undergoing TKA were analyzed with regard to the specific inclusion criteria and recruitment process.

RESULTS

Among the identified RCTs with ≥100 patients, 18 (<8%, with a total of 2,952 randomized patients) used specific radiographic scoring or PROM thresholds in their inclusion criteria. Eleven of the 18 studies used specific radiographic scoring, such as the Kellgren-Lawrence or Ahlbäck classifications. Three studies used preoperative PROM thresholds: Knee Society Knee Score of <60, Knee Society Function Score of <60, Oxford Knee Score of <20, and Hospital for Special Surgery Score of <60. Among studies with <100 patients, 48 (<15%) used specific inclusion criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of RCTs (>85%) did not enroll patients based on disease severity, as measured by PROM score thresholds or radiographic classifications, in their inclusion criteria. The lack of consistent inclusion criteria likely results in heterogeneous cohorts, potentially undermining the validity of RCTs on TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between total hip replacement and total knee replacement

BACKGROUND

Total hip replacements (THR) and total knee replacements (TKR) are effective treatments for severe osteoarthritis (OA). Some studies suggest clinical outcomes following THR are superior to TKR, the reason for which remains unknown. This study compares clinical outcomes between THR and TKR.

AIM

To compare the clinic outcomes of THR anad TKR using a comprehensive range of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal observational study of patients with OA undergoing THR and TKR were evaluated using a comprehensive range of generic and joint specific PROMs pre- and post-operatively.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients were included in the study which comprised the THR group (68 patients) and the TKR group (63 patients). Both groups demonstrated significant post-operative improvements in all PROM scores (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in post-operative PROM scores between the two groups: Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome scores (P = 0.140), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain (P = 0.297) stiffness (P = 0.309) and function (P = 0.945), Oxford Hip and Knee Score (P = 0.076), EuroQol-5D index (P = 0.386) and Short-Form 12-item survey physical component score (P = 0.106). Subgroup analyses showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) between cruciate retaining and posterior stabilised prostheses in the TKR group and no significant difference (P > 0.05) between cemented and uncemented fixation in the THR group. Obese patients had poorer outcomes following TKR but did not significantly influence the outcome following THR.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to some literature, THR and TKR are equally efficacious in alleviating the pain and disability of OA when assessed using a comprehensive range of PROMs. The varying knee prosthesis types and hip fixation techniques did not significantly influence clinical outcome. Obesity had a greater influence on the outcome following TKR than that of THR.

The Early Clinical Outcomes Following Unrestricted Caliper Verified Kinematic Alignment Using a Medial Stabilized Design Total Knee Arthroplasty With a Cruciate Retaining Insert

Background

Although various total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant designs are widely used, the ideal TKA design is yet to be agreed upon. Although the benefits of cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA and medial stabilized (MS) TKA have been reported in literature, the early clinical outcomes of an MS TKA with CR inserts have not been reported. This study aims to report on the patient-reported clinical and radiological outcomes of MS-TKA combined with a CR insert.

Methods

A prospective single-surgeon series evaluated the clinical- and patient-reported outcomes of 115 patients implanted with GMK Sphere CR. Patient outcomes were assessed with the Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS), Forgotten Joint Score, and Visual Analogue Scale for Satisfaction. Radiological assessment for alignment along with active flexion and extension were also assessed.

Results

Improvement in all scores was observed between the preoperative and 1-year follow-up timepoints, with statistical significance seen for Oxford Knee Score as well as KOOS Symptoms, Pain, Sport, quality of life, and activities of daily living subscales. The mean active flexion between the preoperative and both postoperative timepoints at 6 months and 1 year was also statistically significant (P = .021 and P = .001).

Conclusions

MS-TKA with a CR insert can facilitate symptom relief and improve overall function of the knee after surgery. Both the patient and clinical outcomes were comparable to 1-year outcomes utilizing other MS-TKA designs and were superior to those at 1-year follow-up following implantation of CR-TKA. Most notability, the KOOS symptoms and sports score were higher for the MS-TKA with a CR insert than for an MS-TKA design.

The Effect of Congruent Tibial Inserts in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether modern congruent tibial inserts are associated with superior outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Background: Ultracongruent fixed-bearing (UCFB) and medial congruent fixed-bearing (MCFB) inserts have been known to be effective in total knee arthroplasty with patient satisfaction. Nonetheless, no supporting evidence to date exists to rank the clinical outcomes of these various congruent inserts in TKA compared with other important considerations in TKA including cruciate-retaining fixed-bearing (CRFB) and posterior-stabilized fixed-bearing (PSFB) inserts. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus up to 15 May 2022. We selected studies involving an active comparison of UCFB or MCFB in TKAs. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and compared different congruent inserts. We ranked the clinical outcomes by SUCRA score with the estimate of the best treatment probability. Our primary outcomes were revision rates and radiolucent lines. Secondary outcomes were functional scores, including the range of motion (ROM), the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and WOMAC. Results: Eighteen RCTs with 1793 participants were analyzed. Our NMA ranked MCFB, CRFB, and UCFB with the lowest revision rates. CRFB and UCFB had the fewest radiolucent lines. UCFB had overall the best ROM. UCFB and MCFB had the best OKS score overall. Conclusions: The ranking probability for better clinical outcomes in congruent inserts demonstrated the superiority of congruent tibial inserts, including UCFB and MCFB. UCFB may be associated with better ROM and postoperative functional outcomes. However, integrating future RCTs for high-level evidence is necessary to confirm these findings.

Medial pivot design does not yield superior results compared to posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials

PURPOSE

The aim of this meta-analysis was a comparison between medial pivot (MP) and posterior-stabilised (PS) knee designs regarding functional and radiological outcomes as well as gait parameters.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct and Clinical Trials.gov from conception up to April 2022, to identify eligible randomised control trials (RCTs). The extracted data were analysed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, enrolling 1101 patients who underwent 1242 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). A total of 1158 TKAs (581 MP/577 PS) were included in the quantitative analysis. Mean follow-up ranged from 6 months up to 6.6 years. MP knees showed comparable range of motion (ROM) with PS design 1, 2 and 4 years postoperatively (p = 0.2, p = 0.25, p = 0.34, respectively). No statistical difference was found in patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) (p > 0.05). Mean walking speed (MWS), length of stay (LOS), radiographic alignment and complications rates were also similar between the two groups (p > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

The present meta-analysis demonstrated that the theoretical biomechanical advantage of MP implants does not have a better impact on patient satisfaction compared to the traditional PS knees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Medial pivot-based total knee arthroplasty achieves better clinical outcomes than posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Stability in the sagittal plane, particularly regarding anterior cruciate ligament compensation, and postoperative functionality and satisfaction remain issues in total knee arthroplasty. Therefore, this prospective study compared the clinical outcomes between medial-pivot-based and posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty based on anterior translation and clinical scores.

METHODS

To assess outcomes of total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis, the anterior translation distance of the tibia relative to the femur was measured at 30 and 60° of flexion using a KS measure Arthrometer at 6 months postoperatively. The 2011 Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, visual analogue scale for pain, and range of motion were assessed at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The correlations among each score, anterior translation distance, range of motion, and visual analogue scale score for pain were investigated.

RESULTS

The medial-pivot and posterior-stabilised groups comprised 70 and 51 patients, respectively. The medial-pivot group exhibited a significantly shorter anterior translation distance at 60° flexion than the posterior-stabilised group. Furthermore, the medial-pivot group achieved significantly better outcomes regarding the visual analogue scale for pain, 2011 Knee Society Score, and Forgotten Joint Score than the posterior-stabilised group. A significant negative correlation was observed between the anterior translation distance and the function score of the 2011 Knee Society Score, whereas a significant positive correlation was found between the anterior translation distance and flexion angle, and between the extension angle and score of the Forgotten Joint Score or 2011 Knee Society Score. Significant negative correlations were also found between the pain visual analogue scale and both the 2011 Knee Society Score and Forgotten Joint Score.

CONCLUSION

In total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, the medial-pivot group displayed a shorter anterior translation distance than the posterior-stabilised group at 6 months postoperatively. The visual analogue scale score for pain was also significantly lower in the medial-pivot group than that in the posterior-stabilised group at both 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Because a correlation was observed between the anterior translation distance and the function score, medial-pivot-based total knee arthroplasty was considered to significantly improve postoperative function compared to posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.

Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Medial pivot (MP) designs are growing in popularity. They provide increased sagittal plane stability and theoretically replicate some aspects of native joint kinematics, which may improve total knee arthroplasty outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared MP designs with cruciate-retaining, posterior-stabilized (PS), ultracongruent, or mobile-bearings in primary total knee arthroplasty, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The primary outcome measures were all clinical function scores, patient-reported outcome measures, and range of motion. The secondary outcome was complications. Two authors independently selected studies, performed data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Studies at high risk of bias were excluded from meta-analysis. Treatment effects were assessed using random-effects meta-analysis and quantified using pooled mean differences or incidence rate differences as appropriate.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs met inclusion criteria. Five compared MP with PS, two with ultracongruent, and one with cruciate-retaining and mobile-bearing. In total, 350 knees were randomized to MP and 375 to conventional bearings. One RCT was excluded from meta-analysis because of high risk of bias. Meta-analysis comparing MP with PS only was possible and found no differences at any time points for any outcome measure, including 2-year follow-up for Oxford Knee Score (MD = 0.35 favoring PS; 95% CI -0.49 to 1.20) and range of motion (MD = 1.58 favoring MP; 95% CI -0.76 to 11.92, P = 0.30) and 12 months for Western Ontario Arthritis Index (MD = 4.42 favoring MP; 95% CI -12.04 to 3.20, P = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in clinical outcomes, with contemporary measurement tools, at any time points, between MP and PS. There are insufficient RCTs comparing MP with other bearings.

Kinematic function of knee implant designs across a range of daily activities

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to measure and compare six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) knee joint motion of three total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant designs across a range of daily activities. Seventy-five TKA patients were recruited to this study and randomly assigned a posterior-stabilized (PS), cruciate-retaining (CR), or medial-stabilized (MS) implant. Six months after surgery, patients performed five activities of daily living: level walking, step-up, step-down, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit. Mobile biplane X-ray imaging was used to measure 6-DOF knee kinematics and the center of rotation of the knee in the transverse plane for each activity. Mean 6-DOF knee kinematics were consistently similar for PS and CR, whereas MS was more externally rotated and abducted, and lateral shift was lower across all activities. Peak-to-peak anterior drawer for MS was also significantly lower during walking, step-up, and step-down (p < 0.017). The center of rotation of the knee in the transverse plane was located on the medial side for MS, whereas PS and CR rotated about the lateral compartment or close to the tibial origin. The kinematic function of MS was more similar to that of the healthy knee than PS and CR based on reduced paradoxical anterior translation at low flexion angles and a transverse center of rotation located in the medial compartment. Overall, 6-DOF knee joint motion for PS and CR were similar across all daily activities, whereas that measured for MS was appreciably different. The kinematic patterns observed for MS reflects a highly conforming medial articulation in the MS design.

Measurement of Tibial Orientation Helps Select the Optimal Insert Thickness to Personalize PCL Tension in a Medial Ball-in-Socket TKA

As the conformity of a medial ball-in-socket total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides intrinsic anterior-posterior (A-P) stability, surgeons cannot rely on the manual examination of sagittal laxity to identify the optimal insert thickness. Instead, the present study determined whether measuring tibial axial orientation in extension and 90° flexion with an insert goniometer could identify the optimal thickness that, when implanted, provides high postoperative function. In twenty-two patients that underwent unrestricted caliper-verified kinematic alignment (KA) with a PCL retaining implant, two surgeons measured tibial orientation in extension and 90° flexion with 10, 11, 12, and 13 mm thick insert goniometers. Each TKA had one insert thickness that restored either the maximum external tibial orientation in extension, the maximum internal tibial orientation at 90° flexion, or both relative to 1 mm thinner and thicker inserts. In addition, the 6-month median [interquartile range] Forgotten Joint Score of 73 (54–87) and Oxford Knee Score of 42 (38–45) indicated high satisfaction and function. In conclusion, surgeons using a medial ball-in-socket TKA design can measure external tibial orientation in extension and internal tibial orientation at 90° flexion with an insert goniometer. Furthermore, implanting an insert with the thickness that provided the maximum orientation values resulted in high postoperative function, thereby personalizing PCL tension.

Medial pivot prosthesis has a better functional score and lower complication rate than posterior-stabilized prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

We aimed to compare the postoperative clinical efficacy and safety of medial pivot (MP) prosthesis and posterior-stabilized (PS) prosthesis in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Methods

All studies involving MP and PS prosthesis in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched since the establishment of the database. The included outcomes were knee range of motion (ROM), functional score, radiographic results, complication rate, and revision rate. Studies were independently evaluated by the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for case–control studies and the assessment tool of the Cochrane Collaboration for randomized controlled trials. I² was used to test the heterogeneity, and fixed- or random-effects models were selected for meta-analysis according to the heterogeneity results.

Results

A total of 19 studies, consisting of 3592 patients and 3783 knees (MP: 1811 knees, PS: 1972 knees), were included in the meta-analysis. The WOMAC (MD = − 1.11, 95% CI − 1.98 to − 0.23; P = 0.01) and HSS (MD = − 4.32, 95% CI − 8.30 to − 0.34; P = 0.03) in the MP group were significantly lower compared with the PS group, and the complication rate (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33–0.87; P = 0.01) was also lower compared with the PS group. There was no significant difference in ROM, radiographic results, and revision rate between the two groups (P > 0.5).

Conclusions

The existing literature provided evidence to support better clinical effect and lower complication rate of MP prosthesis compared to PS prosthesis. These results provide a reference for clinicians when choosing a suitable prosthesis.

Outcomes are Better With a Medial-Stabilized vs a Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Implanted With Kinematic Alignment

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus whether a posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee device is superior to a more congruent, cruciate-substituting, medial-stabilized device (MS). This study compared the clinical outcomes of these devices. The primary hypothesis was that the clinical outcomes would be better in the MS group implanted with kinematic alignment.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, single-center Level 1 study compared the outcomes of 99 patients who received a PS device and 101 patients who received an MS device implanted with kinematic alignment. Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent were obtained. Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed preoperatively, 6 weeks, 6 months, and annually.

RESULTS

All subjects reached the minimum follow-up of 2 years. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics, preoperative scores, or alignment (preoperative or postoperative). Tourniquet time was 7.24% longer for the PS group (40.28 min vs 37.56 min, P < .0086). There were significant differences between groups for the 1-year and 2-year Knee Society scores, Forgotten Joint Score, and ROM; in every case favoring the MS group. The FJS was 68.3 in the MS group at 2 years and 58.3 in the PS group (P = .02). The maximum flexion at 2 years was 132° in the MS group and 124° in the PS group (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcomes of the MS group at 1 and 2 years were better. At the minimum 2-year follow-up, the results demonstrate the superiority of the medial-stabilized device in terms of multiple clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Comparative Analysis of Contemporary Fixed Tibial Inserts: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Multiple options are available for the tibial insert in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A systematic review (SR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could assist with decision making. We aim to show that designs with increased conformity may improve function and satisfaction without an increase in complications though posterior stabilized (PS) inserts will likely have more flexion.

Methods

A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Studies were limited to RCTs evaluating cruciate retaining (CR), PS, anterior stabilized (AS), medial pivot (MP), bicruciate retaining (BR), and bicruciate stabilizing (BCS) inserts. Mean differences (MD) were used for patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and odds ratios (OR) for reoperation rates and MUA. A systematic review was performed for satisfaction.

Results

27 trials were identified. The NMA showed no difference from a statistical or clinical standpoint for PROMs evaluated. There was a statistical difference for increased flexion for PS knees (3 degrees p 0.04). There were no differences in the MUA or reoperation rates. There was insufficient information to determine if a specific insert improved satisfaction.

Discussion

The results of this NMA show no statistical or clinical difference in PROMs. There was higher flexion for PS knees though the amount was not clinically significant. There was insufficient data for conclusions on patient satisfaction. Therefore, the surgeon should evaluate the clinical situation to determine the best insert rather than choose and insert based on functional scores, patient satisfaction, or complication rates.

Press-Fit Dual-Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty: Early Results With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Ultracongruent (UC) tibial bearings are being used with increasing frequency in the United States. Evidence suggests that the use of certain UC bearings may lead to improved patient satisfaction when compared with using conventional inserts. However, little is known as to what effect the use of UC tibial inserts has on bone ingrowth in uncemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to determine the early clinical and radiographic results of TKA using a press-fit dual-pivot design.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2019, a consecutive series of 232 TKAs were implanted using a press-fit tibial and femoral component and a UC dual-pivot tibial insert. Sixty-two percent of patients were male. The average age was 56 years. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years (range, 24-42 months) using KOOS-JR and Knee Society clinical and radiographic evaluation.

RESULTS

No patient had more than mild knee stiffness at the final follow-up. Two patients reported moderate knee pain with stair climbing. All other patients reported either mild or no pain with activity. Knee Society pain scores averaged 42 points. Flexion averaged 118 degrees. Three knees (1.3%) were revised (one each for flexion instability, tibial plateau fracture, and suspected femoral component loosening). No other cases of femoral or tibial loosening were identified.

CONCLUSION

Although the success of uncemented TKA is determined by a variety of factors, the use of this dual-pivot knee design did not appear to influence tibial or femoral component fixation at early follow-up, yielding acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Comparison of the clinical and patient-reported outcomes between medial stabilized and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is effective in relieving pain and improving function in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Both medial stabilized total knee arthroplasty (MS-TKA) and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS-TKA) can achieve satisfactory clinical results, but comparisons between MS-TKA and PS-TKA have yielded contradictory conclusions. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate the differences in clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) between MS-TKA and PS-TKA.

METHODS

In December 2020, systematic searches of the following databases were undertaken: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials.gov. Studies with PROMs comparing MS-TKA to PS-TKA were included. Meta-analysis was conducted for range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Functional Score (KFS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

RESULTS

There were 17 studies included in this review, 13 studies used for quantitative analysis, and 4 studies used for qualitative synthesis. Meta-analysis concluded that the WOMAC mean difference (MD) for MS-TKA was 1.55 higher than for PS-TKA (MD = -1.55; 95 %CI = -2.45 to -0.64, P = 0.0008); however, this difference was less than the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) value of 15. Assessment using the OKS determined that the MD for PS-TKA was 0.58 higher than for MS-TKA (MD = 0.58; 95 %CI = 0.25 to 0.91, P = 0.0006); again, this MD was less than the MCID value of 5. There were no significant differences between MS-TKA and PS-TKA when assessed by ROM (P = 0.23), KSS (P = 0.13), KFS (P = 0.61), or FJS (P = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

Derived from numerous sources, utilizing a multitude of validated functional and patient-reported outcome assessment tools, there was no clinically evident advantage of MS-TKA compared to PS-TKA.

REGISTRATION

The registration number on PROSPERO is CRD42021228555.

Medial stabilised total knee arthroplasty achieves comparable clinical outcomes when compared to other TKA designs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare clinical and patient-reported outcome measures of medially stabilised (MS) TKA when compared to other TKA designs.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses algorithm was used. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EMCARE databases were searched to June 2020. Studies with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up comparing an MS TKA design to any other TKA design were included. The statistical analysis was completed using Review Manager (RevMan), Version 5.3.

RESULTS

The 22 studies meeting the inclusion criteria included 3011 patients and 4102 TKAs. Overall Oxford Knee Scores were significantly better (p = 0.0007) for MS TKA, but there was no difference in the Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society Score (KSS)-Knee, KSS-Function, and range of motion between MS and non-MS TKA designs. Significant differences were noted for sub-group analyses; MS TKA showed significantly worse KSS-Knee (p = 0.02) and WOMAC (p = 0.03) scores when compared to Rotating Platform (RP) TKA while significantly better FJS (p = 0.002) and KSS-knee scores (p = 0.0001) when compared to cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA.

CONCLUSION

This review and meta-analysis show that MS TKA designs result in both patient and clinical outcomes that are comparable to non-MS implants. These results suggest implant design alone may not provide further improvement in patient outcome following TKA, surgeons must consider other factors, such as alignment to achieve superior outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Medial pivot versus (cam post) posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty, systematic review and meta-analysis of 3837 knees

In the current literature, there is no consensus as to whether the medial pivot (MP) or posterior-stabilised (PS) knee provides the best result for the patient in the context of post-operative range of motion (ROM) and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). The aim of this systematic review is to provide this equipoise with some clarity. We conducted this study following both the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Statement (PRISMA) and the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Studies comparing the MP and PS knees from all regions and written in any language were included. Twenty- one studies were included in this meta-analysis. They were prepared and analysed using Review Manager V5.0 [Computer Program] (RevMan5). We calculated the risk ratio to measure the treatment effect, taking the heterogeneity of the studies into consideration. Random-effect models were also utilised. MP knees were found to have a significant advantage over PS knees in terms of WOMAC score at the midterm follow up, and insignificant advantages over PS knees in terms of ROM and FJS at one and two years follow- up. Additionally, the PS knees demonstrated an in significantly higher Knee Society Score (KSS) at short and midterm follow up. In terms of ROM, KSS, OKS and FJS this meta-analysis suggests a non-significant advantages for the MP knee compared with the PS prothesis in the short term. The MP implant also showed a significantly superior WOMAC score at short-term follow-up. An extended follow-up period is required to evaluate whether the MP knee is superior than the PS in the long-term.