Forgotten Joint Score Thresholds for Forgotten Joint Status and Patient Satisfaction after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Chinese Patients

Predictors Associated with Forgotten Knee in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty Based on Multivariable Linear Regression

OBJECTIVE

Existing studies have conflicting results about the predictors of forgotten joints in patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and the relationship between psychosocial factors and forgotten knees is unknown. The purpose of this study was to confirm predictors for the forgotten joint in TKA patients.

METHODS

This was an observational, prospective longitudinal study. A total of 205 patients who underwent TKA and a 6-month follow-up were included between August 2020 and September 2021. Demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, and psychosocial variables were collected before TKA surgery (T0). The forgotten joint score (FJS) was taken before TKA surgery (T0) and at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T6) after TKA surgery. The psychosocial variables were also completed at T6. Bivariate and multivariable linear regressions (LR) were performed to screen the predictors associated with FJS (T6).

RESULTS

Patients who underwent TKA in our study had a mean FJS of 20.3 ± 12.2 before surgery, 15.9 ± 10.3 at 1 month, 28.7 ± 12.6 at 3 months, and 40.3 ± 12.5 at 6 months. The predictors were sex, combined musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), operation time, FJS (T3), range of motion (ROM) (T6), pain score (T6), Groningen orthopaedic social support scale (GO-SSS) score (T6), and the generalized anxiety disorder scale (GAD) score (T6). The data satisfied the assumptions of multivariable linear regressions. The multiple R2 of LR was 0.71, and the adjusted R2 was 0.70. The F-statistic of the LR model was 59.5 (p < 0.000).

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed the level of forgotten knee decreased slightly from preoperation to 1 month postoperatively and then increased from 1 month postoperatively to 6 months postoperatively in TKA patients. The main predictors associated with the FJS at 6 months after surgery were sex, combined MSD, operation time, FJS (T3), ROM (T6), pain score (T6), GO-SSS score (T6), and anxiety (T6).

Establishing patient-centered metrics for the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score following medial unicompartmental knee arthropalsty

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the patient acceptable symptoms state (PASS) threshold for the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) pain subscore, KOOS physical short form (PS), and KOOS joint replacement (JR) following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA).

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from 743 patients undergoing mUKA from a single academic institution from April 2015 through March 2020 were analyzed. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected both pre-operatively and 1-year post-operatively. Distribution-based and anchored-based approaches were used to estimate MCIDs and PASS, respectively. The optimal cut-off point and the percentage of patients who achieved PASS were also calculated.

RESULTS

MCID for KOOS-pain, KOOS-PS, and KOOS-JR following mUKA were calculated to be 7.6, 7.3, and 6.2, respectively. The PASS threshold for KOOS pain, PS, and JR were 77.8, 70.3, and 70.7, with 68%, 66%, and 64% of patients achieving satisfactory outcomes, respectively. Cut-off values for delta KOOS pain, PS, and JR were found to be 25.7, 14.3, and 20.7 with 73%, 69%, and 68% of patients achieving satisfactory outcomes, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The current study identified useful values for the MCID and PASS thresholds at 1 year following medial UKA of KOOS pain, KOOS PS, and KOOS JR scores. These values may be used as targets for surgeons when evaluating PROMS using KOOS to determine whether patients have achieved successful outcomes after their surgical intervention. Potential uses include the integration of these values into predictive models to enhance shared decision-making and guide more informed decisions to optimize patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Evaluating the Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Womac Osteoarthritis Index after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are standardized questionnaires that gather information on health-related quality of life directly from patients. Since a significant statistical mean change may not correspond to a clinical improvement, there is a need to calculate a considerable change in scores. This is done by the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). The objective of this article is to report the MCID and the PASS values of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University) osteoarthritis index for patients undergoing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA). A total of 37 patients (25 females and 12 males; mean age 68 ± 8.1 years and mean BMI 28.7 ± 4) who underwent UKA were enrolled. All patients were assessed using the WOMAC and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) questionnaires before and six months following the procedure. To measure the cut-off values for MCID, distribution methods and anchor methods were applied, while the PASS was assessed only via anchor approaches. The MCID related to the WOMAC average global score was 90.7 ± 7.6, the average pain dimension score was 93.2 ± 6.6, the average stiffness dimension score was 92.6 ± 17, and the average physical function dimension score was 89.7 ± 7.6. In terms of PASS, the normalized WOMAC was 82.8, the pain dimension was 87.5, the stiffness dimension was 93.7, and the functional dimension was 83.1. A 34.5 amelioration in the WOMAC score, from initial evaluation to final follow-up, using change in OKS > 5 as anchor, indicates that the patients' health state improved to a clinically significant degree. A value at least of 82.8 in WOMAC score after treatment denotes that the symptom state is deemed acceptable by most of the patients.

Image-based robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty provides high survival and good-to-excellent clinical outcomes at minimum 10 years follow-up

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to determine the incidence of revision and report on clinical outcomes at a minimum of 10 years follow-up in patients who had received a medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with an three-dimensional image-based robotic system.

METHODS

A total of 239 patients (247 knees), who underwent medial robotic-arm assisted (RA)-UKA at a single center between April 2011 and June 2013, were assessed. The mean age at surgery was 67.0 years (SD 8.4). Post-operatively, patients were administered the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) and asked about their satisfaction (from 1 to 5). Post-operative complications were recorded. Failure mechanisms, revisions and reoperations were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated, considering revision as the event of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients (196 knees) were assessed at a mean follow-up of 11.1 years (SD 0.5, range 10.0-11.9), resulting in a 79.4% follow-up rate. Seven RA-UKA underwent revision, resulting in a survivorship rate of 96.4% (CI 94.6%-99.2%). Causes of revision included aseptic loosening (2 cases), infection (1 case), post-traumatic (1 case), and unexplained pain (3 cases). The mean FJS-12 and satisfaction were 82.2 (SD 23.9) and 4.4 (SD 0.9), respectively. Majority of cases (174/196, 88.8%) attained the Patient Acceptable Symptoms State (PASS, FJS-12 > 40.63). Male subjects had a higher probability of attaining a "forgotten joint" (p < 0.001) and high satisfaction (equal to 5, p < 0.05), when compared to females.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional image-based RA-UKA demonstrated high implant survivorship and good-to-excellent clinical outcomes at minimum 10 years follow-up. Pain of unknown origin represented the most common reason for RA-UKA revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State following Patellofemoral Inlay Arthroplasty for Visual Analog Scale Pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, and Lysholm Scores

BACKGROUND

The purposes of the study were to define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) after patello-femoral inlay arthroplasty (PFA) and to identify factors predictive for the achievement of clinically important outcomes (CIOs).

METHODS

A total of 99 patients who underwent PFA between 2009 and 2019 and had a minimum of 2-year postoperative follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective monocentric study. Included patients had a mean age of 44 years (range, 21 to 79). The MCID and PASS were calculated using an anchor-based approach for the visual analog scale (VAS) pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and Lysholm patient-reported outcome measures. Factors associated with CIO achievement were determined using multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The established MCID thresholds for clinical improvement were -2.46 for the VAS pain score, -8.5 for the WOMAC score, and + 25.4 for the Lysholm score. Postoperative scores corresponding to the PASS were <2.55 for the VAS pain score, <14.6 for the WOMAC score, and >52.5 points for the Lysholm score. Preoperative patellar instability and concomitant medial patello-femoral ligament reconstruction were independent positive predictors of reaching both MCID and PASS. Additionally, inferior baseline scores and age were predictive of achieving MCID, whereas superior baseline scores and body mass index were predictive of achieving PASS.

CONCLUSION

This study determined the thresholds of MCID and PASS for the VAS pain, WOMAC, and Lysholm scores following PFA implantation at 2-year follow-up. The study demonstrated a predictive role of patient age, body mass index, preoperative patient-reported outcome measure scores, preoperative patellar instability, and concomitant medial patello-femoral ligament reconstruction in the achievement of CIOs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV.

The Impact of Arthroscopy on Surgical Decision-Making and Outcomes in Osteoarthritis Patients Undergoing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Background and objective Although unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a minimally invasive procedure, its application is limited due to strict criteria related to indications. In clinical practice, the aid of procedures such as arthroscopy is occasionally required to determine the surgical indication and thereby improve prognosis. In light of this, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of intraoperative arthroscopy on surgical decision-making in osteoarthritis (OA) patients and the prognosis of patients undergoing UKA. Methodology The clinical records of patients diagnosed with knee OA who underwent knee arthroplasty between January 2017 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with radiographic evidence of single-compartmental Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 3 or 4 knee OA but presenting symptoms of persistent multicompartmental knee pain or locking for at least six months, with a history of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury or meniscus tear. They had undergone either UKA or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Data on clinical characteristics and outcomes at baseline and during follow-up were collected. Results A total of 429 patients were included in the study. Patients who underwent arthroscopy were more likely to undergo UKA surgery than those who did not (p<0.05). Among patients who underwent UKA, no instances of blood transfusion during hospitalization or postoperative complications were reported, regardless of whether arthroscopy was performed or not. Although the overall Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores and Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS) did not differ between the two groups, the Knee Society Score (KSS) was significantly higher in patients who underwent arthroscopy (88.77 ±5.09) compared to those who did not (85.53 ±5.11). Similarly, the arthroscopy group had a higher overall Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) (44.6 ±4.20) than the UKA-only group (42.05 ±3.58). Conclusion Arthroscopy findings can assist in surgical decision-making for OA patients. Performing arthroscopy and UKA simultaneously is relatively safe and may be associated with favorable outcomes.

Comparison of joint awareness after total knee arthroplasty, medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, and high tibial osteotomy: a retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the Forgotten Joint Score-12(FJS) outcomes and the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of the FJS after high tibial osteotomy (HTO), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with short-term follow-up (at least 2 years). Another objective of the study is to investigate the factors influencing FJS. It is hypothesized that there are differences in FJS outcomes among the three procedures.

METHODS

Patients who underwent HTO, UKA, and TKA from January 2016 to December 2020 and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years were included in the study. The FJS were analyses from a cohort of people who submitted data to two years. The preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes were compared and evaluated the patient-related factor. The FJS scores were predicted using multiple linear regression analysis. Additionally, Patient's Joint Perception (PJP) questions were used as anchors to determine the achievement of the forgotten joint, and FJS MCID were calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-nine patients were included in the final study, and there were 111 patients in HTO groups,128patients in UKA groups, and 150 patients in TKA groups. The mean follow-up was 47.0 months. There was a significant difference in the total FJS, between the HTO, UKA, and TKA groups (FJS:59.38 ± 7.25, 66.69 ± 7.44 and 56.90 ± 6.85, p < 0.001. We found the MCID of the FJS of HTO, UKA, and TKA were 63.54, 69.79, and 61.45, respectively. In multiple linear regression, younger age, and higher FS were significant predictors of better FJS.

CONCLUSION

Medial UKA demonstrated lower patient awareness in comparison to HTO and TKA, as assessed by the FJS. Younger age and higher FS were identified as significant predictors of improved FJS, providing valuable guidance for surgical decision-making.

Does diabetes mellitus impair the clinical results of total knee arthroplasty under enhanced recovery after surgery?

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and osteoarthritis (OA) are common diseases that are predicted to increase in prevalence, and DM is a risk factor for OA progression and has a negative impact on the outcome. However, the evidence remains unclear on how it affects patients' clinical results of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) under enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study was conducted comparing diabetic and non-diabetic patients who underwent TKA in West China Hospital of Sichuan University between September 2016 to December 2017 under ERAS. Consecutive propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted by 1:1 (DM: non-DM) matching analysis with all baselines as covariates. The primary clinical results were the improvement of knee joint function, the incidence of postoperative complications, and the FJS-12 sensory results 5 years after the operation between DM and Non-DM groups. The secondary clinical results were the postoperative length of stay (LOS), postoperative blood test and total blood loss (TBL).

RESULT

After PSM, the final analysis included 84 diabetic patients and 84 non-diabetic patients. Diabetic patients were more likely to experience early postoperative complications (21.4% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.003), of which wound complications are the most significant (10.7% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.022). Diabetic patients experienced longer postoperative LOS with a significant increase in patients with LOS exceeding 3 days (66.7% vs. 50%, P = 0.028) and showed less postoperative range of motion (ROM) (106.43 ± 7.88 vs. 109.50 ± 6.33 degrees, P = 0. 011). Diabetic patients also reported lower Forgotten joint score (FJS-12) than non-diabetic patients (68.16 + 12.16 vs. 71.57 + 10.75, P = 0.020) in the 5-year follow-up and were less likely to achieve a forgotten knee joint (10.7% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.022). In additional, Compared with non-diabetics, diabetic patients showed lower hemoglobin (Hb) (P < 0.001) and hematocrit (HCT) (P < 0.001) and were more likely to suffer from hypertension before TKA (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Diabetic patients show increased risk for postoperative complications, and have lower lower postoperative ROM and lower FJS-12 compared with non-diabetic patients after TKA under ERAS. More perioperative protocols are still needed to be investigated and optimized for diabetic patients.

What is the difference in proprioception between single condylar arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy? a comparative study on both knees of the same patient

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and outcomes of different surgical procedures, namely unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO), for the treatment of bilateral medial compartment knee osteoarthritis in the same patient. The joint awareness and function of these two surgical methods were evaluated.

METHODS

A total of 15 patients with bilateral medial compartment knee osteoarthritis who underwent either UKA or HTO between 2012 and 2020 were included in the study. Patient data, including age, gender, body mass index and length of hospital stay, were collected. Pre- and post-operative measurements were conducted, including tibiofemoral angle, tibial plateau posterior inclination angle, proximal tibial medial angle, distance from mechanical axis to knee joint center, hip-knee-ankle angle, pre- and post-operative knee joint scores, knee joint range of motion, and FIS-12 scores at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The latest follow-up was used for evaluating the outcomes of osteoarthritis treatment. Normality of continuous variables was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Between-group comparisons were performed using the paired sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Repeated measures analysis of variance was utilized to analyze FJS-12 measurements at different time points, and the correlation between FJS-12 and postoperative clinical results was examined using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed in FJS between the UKA and HTO groups at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, but no significant difference was found at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. FJS in the UKA group demonstrated a significant increase from 3 to 6 months postoperatively, but no significant difference was observed from 6 to 24 months postoperatively. In contrast, FJS in the HTO group showed a significant increase from 3 to 24 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent UKA exhibited superior joint awareness compared to those who underwent HTO during the early postoperative period. Furthermore, the rate of joint awareness in UKA patients was faster than in HTO patients.

Safe and reliable clinical outcomes at 2 years of a fixed-bearing partial knee arthroplasty with a morphometric tibial tray in a large worldwide population

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate: (1) improvement of functional and quality of life scores, (2) adverse events, (3) short-term implants survivorship of a newly designed fixed-bearing partial knee replacement (PKR) with a morphometric tibial tray in a large and multicentric population at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

METHODS

From 2017 to 2019, 479 medial PKR were implanted by 16 non-developing surgeons from United States, Europe, and Japan. Eight patients were lost to follow-up (1.8%). Standardized follow-up procedures included patient-reported outcomes (Oxford Knee Society score, Forgotten Joint Score, EQ VAS, EQ 5D), patient satisfaction, radiographic assessments, adverse event at 2 years. Comparisons between the preoperative and postoperative values were performed using Student t test. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with knee revision as the endpoint.

RESULTS

The mean age was 65.6 ± 9.6 years. Mean body mass index was 29.5 ± 5.1 kg/m². Oxford Knee Society score and Forgotten Joint Score, respectively, improved from 23.7 ± 8 and 16 ± 15.8 preoperatively to 42.4 ± 6.5 and 74 ± 24.9 at 2 years (p < 0.0001). Satisfaction Score was 92.3 ± 13.4 at 2 years. Ten re-operations (2.1%) were reported including seven implant removals (1.5%). No other adverse event was reported. The causes of conversion to total knee arthroplasty were: nickel allergy (n = 2), patellofemoral osteoarthritis (n = 1), pain (n = 1), deep infection (n = 3). Two re-operations were performed due to infection, and one for internal fixation for a tibial plateau fracture. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimate was 98.4%, with implant removals as the endpoint.

CONCLUSION

This prospective multicentric study reported safe and reliable clinical outcomes of a morphometric PKR, which optimized tibial coverage and femoral fit, in a large population of patients worldwide at 2 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cohort study-therapeutic study, Level II.

Robotic-arm assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 5-Year outcomes & survivorship

INTRODUCTION

Robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RA-UKA) has demonstrated accurate component positioning and excellent outcomes for medial components. However, there is a paucity of literature on lateral compartment RA-UKA. The purpose of our study was to assess the midterm clinical outcomes and survivorship of lateral RA-UKA.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of a single-center prospectively maintained cohort of 33 patients (36 knees) indicated for lateral UKA. Perioperative, and postoperative two- and five-year Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Score (WOMAC), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) patient reported outcome measures were collected. Five-year follow-up was recorded in 29 patients (32 knees).

RESULTS

Mean follow up was 5.1 ± 0.1 years. Mean age and BMI was 70.9 ± 7.2 years and 29.0 ± 4.2 kg/m2, respectively. At discharge, mean distance walked was 273.4 ± 70.4 feet, and mean pain score was 2.0 ± 2.5. At 2-year follow up, mean KOOS, WOMAC, and FJS were 75.1 ± 13.5, 15.0 ± 7.2, and 81.0 ± 23.3, respectively. At 5-year follow up, mean KOOS, WOMAC, and FJS were 75.3 ± 14.6, 14.9 ± 5.0, and 75.8 ± 27.4, respectively. Mean change in KOOS and WOMAC were 35.6 ± 27.1 and 11.7 ± 13.4 (p< .001 and p< .001). 94% of patients were very satisfied/satisfied, 3% neutral, and 3% dissatisfied. 91% met activity expectations, and 59% were more active than before. Survivorship was 100% at 5 years.

DISCUSSION

In this study, lateral RA-UKA demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes, high patient satisfaction, met expectations, and excellent functional recovery at midterm follow up. Comparative studies are needed to determine differences between robotic-assisted and conventional lateral UKA, as well as TKA.

The dynamic impact of Joint Awareness on Quality of Life after Total Knee Arthroplasty: a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Joint Awareness is thought to be closely linked to Quality of Life (QoL) for patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), yet to date there have been no longitudinal studies to explore how Joint Awareness actually affects QoL. The purpose of this study was therefore to examine the development of Joint Awareness and QoL after TKA as well as the dynamic impact of Joint Awareness on QoL.

METHODS

A total of 342 patients were followed up at 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), and 12 months (T3) after TKA. Joint Awareness was evaluated using the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), and QoL was measured by SF-36. We used repeated measures analysis of variance to estimate the development of Joint Awareness and QoL and employed a cross-lagged model to examine the dynamic relationship between Joint Awareness and QoL.

RESULTS

Both Joint Awareness and QoL improved with postoperative time (p < 0.001). Importantly, T1 Joint Awareness positively predicted T2 physical QoL (p < 0.001), and T2 Joint Awareness positively predicted T3 physical QoL (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, Joint Awareness had no predictive effect on mental QoL (p = 0.082-0.931).

CONCLUSIONS

In different periods after TKA, Joint Awareness and QoL both increased monotonically, and Joint Awareness positively predicted physical QoL. These findings indicate that focusing on Joint Awareness may be a priority when trying to improve the postoperative life of patients.

Predictors of a forgotten joint after medial fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

A forgotten joint is considered the ultimate goal of joint replacement. We aim to explore the predictive factors of a forgotten joint after fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used prospectively collected data from 302 cases of medial-compartment UKA with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The primary outcome was the achievement of a forgotten joint after UKA, according to the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) at the last follow-up. Patients with FJS-12 > 84 were considered to have forgotten UKA. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted with preoperative patient characteristics and surgery-related factors as potential predictors.

RESULTS

Of patients, 94 (31.1%) achieved a forgotten joint post-surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA), and postoperative HKAA and HKAA changes were independent predictors of a forgotten joint. The probability of achieving a forgotten joint increased by 29% (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.12-1.51) with a 1° increase in aLDFA. Preoperative HKAA, postoperative HKAA, HKAA changes (ΔHKAA), and outcomes exhibited a non-linear relationship. The probability of achieving a forgotten joint was the highest with preoperative HKAA > 172.0°, postoperative HKAA of 176.0-178.5°, and ΔHKAA < 5.5°.

CONCLUSION

To achieve the forgotten joint state, the ideal HKAA range after medial fixed-bearing UKA is 176.0-178.5° and ΔHKAA should be <5.5°. Patients with smaller preoperative aLDFA and HKAA have a lower probability of achieving a forgotten joint after UKA.

Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In order to better understand the clinical benefits of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and improve the interpretability of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12), the establishment of a meaningful change in score is necessary. The purpose of this study is to determine the threshold of the FJS-12 for detecting the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) following primary TKA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent elective, primary TKA and answered both the FJS-12 and the Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey, Joint Replacement KOOS, JR surveys 1-year postoperatively. The questionnaires were administered via a web-based electronic application. KOOS, JR score was used as the anchor. The anchor for PASS calculation should relate pain, physical function, and patient satisfaction. Two statistical methods were employed: (1) the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve point; (2) 75^th percentile of the cumulative percentage curve of patients who had the KOOS, JR score difference larger than the cut-off value.

RESULTS

This study included 457 patients. The mean 1-year FJS-12 score was 42.6 ± 27.8. The mean 1-year KOOS, JR score was 68.0 ± 17.2. A high positive correlation between FJS-12 and KOOS, JR was found (r = 0.72, P < .001) making the KOOS, JR a valid external anchor. The threshold score of the FJS-12 which maximized the sensitivity and specificity for detecting a PASS was 33.3 (AUC = 0.78, 95% CI [0.74, 0.83]). The cut-off value computed with the 75^th percentile approach was 77.1 (95% CI [73.9, 81.5]).

CONCLUSION

The PASS threshold for the FJS-12 was 33.3 and 77.1 at 1-year follow-up after primary TKA using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and 75^th percentile approaches, respectively. These values can be used to assess the successful achievement of a forgotten joint.

LEVEL III EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study.

5-Year Survivorship and Outcomes of Robotic-Arm-Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Purpose

While unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has demonstrated benefits over total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in selected populations, component placement continues to be challenging with conventional surgical instruments, resulting in higher early failure rates. Robotic-arm-assisted UKA (RA-UKA) has shown to be successful in component positioning through preop planning and intraop adjustability. The purpose of this study is to assess the 5-year clinical outcomes of medial RA-UKA.

Methods

This study was a retrospective review of a single-center prospectively maintained cohort of 133 patients (146 knees) indicated for medial UKA from 2009 to 2013. Perioperative data and 2- and 5-year Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Score (WOMAC), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) outcome measures were collected. Five-year follow-up was recorded in 119 patients (131 knees).

Results

Mean follow-up was 5.1 ± 0.2 years. Mean age and BMI were 68.0 ± 8.1 years and 29.3 ± 4.7 kg/m², respectively. At 2-year follow-up, mean KOOS, WOMAC, and FJS were 71.5 ± 15.3, 14.3 ± 7.9, and 79.1 ± 25.8, respectively. At 5-year follow-up, mean KOOS, WOMAC, and FJS were 71.6 ± 15.2, 14.2 ± 7.9, and 80.9 ± 25.1, respectively. Mean change in KOOS and WOMAC was 34.6 ± 21.4 and 11.0 ± 13.6, respectively (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). For patient satisfaction at last follow-up, 89% of patients were very satisfied/satisfied and 5% were dissatisfied. For patient activity expectations at last follow-up, 85% met activity expectations, 52% were more active than before, 25% have the same level of activity, 23% were less active than before, and 89% were walking without support. All patients returned to driving after surgery at a mean 15.2 ± 9.4 days. Survivorship was 95% (95% CI 0.91-0.98) at 5 years. One knee (1%) had a patellofemoral revision, two knees (1.3%) were revised to different partial knee replacements, and five knees (3.4%) were converted to TKA.

Conclusion

Overall, medial RA-UKA demonstrated improved patient-recorded outcomes, high patient satisfaction, met expectations, and excellent functional recovery. Midterm survivorship was excellent. Longitudinal follow-up is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes of robotic-arm-assisted UKA procedures.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: the Italian version of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 is valid and reliable to assess prosthesis awareness

PURPOSE

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) recorded an increased incidence of around 30% per year in the United States. Patient's experience and satisfaction after surgery were traditionally assessed by pre, and post-surgical scores and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scales. Traditional scales as Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) reported high ceiling effect. Patients treated by UKA usually perform well; therefore, it is necessary to have a PROMs' scale with a low ceiling effect as the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). PROMs have to be validated in the local language to be used. This study aims to perform a psychometric validation of the Italian version of FJS-12 for UKA for the first time.

METHODS

Between January 2019 and October 2019, 44 patients were included. Each patient completed both the FJS-12 Italian version and the WOMAC Italian version in preoperative follow-up, after 2-week and 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month postoperative follow-up. Cronbach's α, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated to evaluate the reliability. The Pearson coefficient was used to assess validity. The Effect Size (ES) was used to test the responsiveness.

RESULTS

A range of Cronbach's α between 0.90 and 0.95 indicated good internal consistency for the FJS-12. The test-retest reliability was acceptable (i.e., the ICC was higher than 0.7) at each follow-up. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the FJS-12 and WOMAC was - 0.11 (n.s.) at preoperative follow-up, r = 0.47 (P = 0.001) at 1 month, r = 0.57 (P < 0.001) at 3 months, and r = 0.57 (P < 0.001) at 6 months. Therefore, except for the preoperative period, the validity of the FJS-12 score was assessed.

CONCLUSION

The FJS-12 represents a valid and reliable tool with a low ceiling effect to assess the outcomes improvement in UKA patients. Therefore, validating and translating this score in different languages could help perform more accurate studies on outcomes after UKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Combined procedures with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: High risk of stiffness but promising concept in selected indications

Introduction: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has traditionally been contraindicated in the presence of an ACL deficient knee, bi-compartmental disease, or significant coronal deformity due to concerns regarding increased risk of persisted pain, knee instability, tibial loosening, or progression of osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing UKA with an associated surgical procedure in these specific indications. Method: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing UKA between December 2015 and October 2020. Patients were categorized into groups based on associated procedures: UKA + ACL, UKA + HTO, and bicompartmental arthroplasty. Outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS) knee and function scores and the Forgotten Joint Score. Radiological and complication analysis was performed at the last clinical follow-up. Results: Thirty-two patients (13 men and 19 women) were included. The mean age was 56.2 years ± 11.1 (range, 33–84) with a mean follow-up of 26.3 months ± 15 (7.3–61.1). There was a significant improvement between the pre-and postoperative KSS Knee (+34.3 ± 16.5 [12–69]), Function (+34.3 ± 18.6 [0–75]), and Total scores (+68.5 ± 29.4 [24–129]) (p = 0.001). Seven patients (21.8%) required an arthroscopic arthrolysis for persistent stiffness. Two patients (UKA + PFA and UKA + ACL) underwent revision to TKA. Patient satisfaction was 90%, and mean flexion at last follow-up was 122° ± 6 (120–140). The implant survival rate was 94%. Discussion: This study found performing UKA with an additional procedure to address relative contraindications to the arthroplasty in physically active patients with monocompartmental knee arthritis is an efficient strategy with good results at short-term follow-up. It should be reserved for patients where TKA is likely to have unsatisfactory results, and the patient has been fully counseled regarding the management options. Even if there is a high rate of complications with stiffness requiring a re-intervention, the final results are very satisfying with no impact of the reintervention on the clinical result in the short term.

Substantial clinical benefit and patient acceptable symptom states of the Forgotten Joint Score 12 after primary knee arthroplasty

Background and purpose - Knowing how to interpret values obtained with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) is essential. We estimated the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for Forgotten Joint Score 12 (FJS) and explored differences depending on methods used for the estimates. Patients and methods - The study was based on 195 knee arthroplasties (KA) performed at a university hospital. We used 1 item from the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score domain quality of life and satisfaction with surgery, obtained 1-year postoperatively, to assess SCB and PASS thresholds of the FJS with anchor-based methods. We used different combinations of anchor questions for SCB and PASS (satisfied, satisfied with no or mild knee difficulties, and satisfied with no knee difficulties). A novel predictive approach and receiver-operating characteristics curve were applied for the estimates. Results - 70 and 113 KAs were available for the SCB and PASS estimates, respectively. Depending on method, SCB of the FJS (range 0-100) was 28 (95% CI 21-35) and 22 (12-45) respectively. PASS was 31 (2-39) and 20 (10-29) for satisfied patients, 40 (31-47) and 38 (32-43) for satisfied patients with no/mild difficulties, and 76 (39-80) and 64 (55-74) for satisfied patients with no difficulties. The areas under the curve ranged from 0.82 to 0.88. Interpretation - Both the SCB and PASS thresholds varied depending on methodology. This may indicate a problem using meaningful values from other studies defining outcomes after KA. This study supports the premise of the FJS as a PROM with good discriminatory ability in patients undergoing KA.

Preoperative Osteoarthritic Grade Affects Forgotten Joint Status and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Robotic Arm-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

This retrospective observational study was designed to investigate the association between radiographic Ahlbäck osteoarthritis (OA) grade and postoperative joint perception in a cohort of patients undergoing medial robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RA-UKA), using the Forgotten Joint Status and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) as outcomes.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and May 2019, 660 patients (719 knees) underwent medial RA-UKA at 2 centers. Ahlbäck OA grade was measured on preoperative knee radiographs. Postoperatively, patients were administered the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) and 5-level Likert scale to assess patients' satisfaction. Correlations were described among FJS-12, satisfaction, and Ahlbäck OA grade by means of logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 547 patients (602 knees) were assessed at a mean follow-up of 3.5 years (standard deviation 1.4). A total of 293 cases were graded as Ahlbäck 1 (Group A) and 309 knees were graded as Ahlbäck>1 (Group B). Statistically significant difference was detected in mean FJS-12 (P < .001), but not in the postoperative satisfaction level (P = .06) between the 2 groups. Patients in Group B had a significantly higher probability of attaining a "forgotten knee" after the operation, compared to Group A (P < .05). Cases in Group A had a significantly lower probability of achieving the PASS (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Patients with higher grades of OA (Ahlbäck>1) were more likely to attain a "forgotten knee," while patients with less severe OA (Ahlbäck 1) were less likely to achieve the PASS after RA-UKA. Although patients with less severe OA reported fairly good outcome, cases in which the results will be poorer are currently difficult to predict.

Joint awareness after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the joint awareness after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It was hypothesized that patients with UKA could better forget about their artificial joint in comparison to TKA.

METHODS

A search of major literature databases and bibliographic details revealed 105 studies evaluating forgotten joint score in UKA and TKA. Seven studies found eligible for this review were assessed for risk of bias and quality of evidence using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The forgotten joint score (FJS-12) was assessed at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.

RESULTS

The mean FJS-12 at 2 years was 82.35 in the UKA group and 74.05 in the TKA group. Forest plot analysis of five studies (n = 930 patients) revealed a mean difference of 7.65 (95% CI: 3.72, 11.57, p = 0.0001; I² = 89% with p < 0.0001) in FJS-12 at 2 years. Further sensitivity analysis lowered I² heterogeneity to 31% after exclusion of the study by Blevin et al. (MD 5.88, 95%CI: 3.10, 8.66, p < 0.0001). A similar trend of differences in FJS-12 between the groups was observed at 6 months (MD 32.49, 95% CI: 17.55, 47.43, p < 0.0001) and at 1 year (MD 25.62, 95% CI: 4.26, 46.98, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

UKA patients can better forget about their artificial joint compared to TKA patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Forgotten Joint Score Post Total Knee Arthroplasty and Its Correlation with the New Knee Society Score

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is designed to asses patient recovery post Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in a new dimension. It assess the ability to forget the operated joint as artificial during activities of daily living. New Knee Society Score (NKSS) is developed to encompass objective and subjective outcome as well as an assessment of patient expectation and satisfaction. Our purpose was (1) to determine FJS at 1 year post TKA in Indian Patients, and (2) to assess convergent validity between FJS and the NKSS. We hypothesised that FJS should strongly correlate with the Satisfaction (SS) and Knee perception(KPS) sub-component of NKSS.

METHODS

We enrolled 181 patients who underwent primary TKA during an 8-month duration. They were prospectively followed up at 1-year review clinic when FJS and NKSS were administered. 169 patients completed the assessment forms and 13 patients were lost to follow-up. Statistical evaluation was done with Spearman correlation test.

RESULTS

Mean FJS at 1 year was 66.6 ± 25.9 with 14% ceiling and 1% floor effects. There was a mild to moderate correlation of FJS with NKSS (p < 0.001, r = 0.47) and its sub-scores (p < 0.001; r = 0.43 and r = 0.44). There was a weak correlation of FJS with NKSS sub-components of SS and KPS (p < 0.001; r = 0.37 and 0.25, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Mean FJS at 1 year post TKA showed convergent validity with NKSS; however, the correlation was not strong enough to use them interchangeably. Hypothesis that FJS should strongly correlate with the NKSS sub-components of satisfaction and joint perception was refuted. We conclude, FJS provides unique evaluation in recovery post TKA, different from NKSS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Effect of Preoperative Diabetes on the Achievement of Forgotten Knee Status in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Forgotten knee is the terminology which is used to describe a post-TKA patient who is completely unaware of his knee implant. The aim of the study is to determine whether preoperative diabetes negatively influences the achievement of forgotten knee status.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. 300 patients (240 F:60 M) were studied. Patients were evaluated by an independent observer with FJS-12 score 2 weeks preop and at 6 weeks and 12 months after the operation. The patients with a FJS-12 score of ≥ 55 were considered to have achieved forgotten knee status. Out of 240 females, 96 had diabetes and out of 60 males, 18 had diabetes. Preoperative factors such as preop HBA1c, ROM, degree of deformity, VAS score and other associated co morbidities and postoperative factors such as HBA1c, ROM and hip-knee-ankle alignment were studied. Study was started with null hypothesis. The statistical difference was measured with Binominal proportion test and comparison of means t test.

RESULTS

96 out of 144 non-diabetic females (66.67%) and 51 out of 96 diabetic females (53%) achieved forgotten knee status (statistically significant, p value = 0.0336, Binominal proportion test). 27 out of 42 (65%) non-diabetic males and 12 out 18 diabetic males (66%) achieved forgotten knee status (p value = 0.9411). The FJS-12 score at 1 year for non-diabetic females and diabetic females was 58.6 mean ± 12.6 SD and 53.8 ± 17.6, respectively, which is statistically significant, p value 0.0145. The FJS-12 at 1 year in non-diabetic and diabetic males was 60.1 ± 14.8 and 59.6 ± 17.3, respectively, p value = 0.9097.

CONCLUSION

Diabetic females have less chance of achieving a forgotten knee status than non-diabetic females. This understanding will help the operating surgeon in the preoperative patient counseling and modify the patient expectations.

Meaningful values in the Forgotten Joint Score after total knee arthroplasty

AIMS

The aim of this study was to identify the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), minimal important change (MIC), minimal detectable change (MDC), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) threshold in the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) according to patient satisfaction six months following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

During a one-year period 484 patients underwent a primary TKA and completed preoperative and six-month FJS and OKS. At six months patients were asked, "How satisfied are you with your operated knee?" Their response was recorded as: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. The difference between patients recording neutral (n = 44) and satisfied (n = 153) was used to define the MCID. MIC for a cohort was defined as the change in the FJS for those patients declaring their outcome as satisfied, whereas receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the MIC for an individual and the PASS threshold. Distribution-based methodology was used to calculate the MDC.

RESULTS

Using satisfaction as the anchor question, the MCID for the FJS was 16.6 (95% confidence interval (CIs) 8.9 to 24.3; p < 0.001) and when adjusting for confounding this decreased to 13.7 points (95% CI 4.8 to 22.5; p < 0.001). The MIC for the FJS for a cohort of patients was 17.7 points and for an individual patient was 10 points. The MDC90 for the FGS was 12 points; where 90% of patients scoring more than this will have experienced a real change that is beyond measurement error. The PASS was defined as 22 points or more in the postoperative FJS.

CONCLUSION

The estimates for MCID and MIC can be used to assess whether there is clinical difference between two groups and whether a cohort/patient has had a meaningful change in their FJS, respectively. The MDC90 of 12 points suggests a value lower than this may fall within measurement error. A postoperative FJS of 22 or more was predictive of achieving PASS. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):846-854.

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Minimal Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score

Background and Objectives: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a valid alternative to total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in selected cases. After surgery, patients' experience and satisfaction were traditionally evaluated by pre- and postsurgical scores and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Otherwise, a statistically significant change does not necessarily correlate to a clinically meaningful improvement when measured using PROMs. To evaluate the real effect of a specific treatment and understand the difference between groups in a clinical trial, it is necessary to use a meaningful quantum of change on the score assessed. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) can provide this meaningful change. This paper aimed to calculate the MCID and the PASS of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) after UKA. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients with a mean age 72.5 ± 6.4 years undergoing UKA were assessed preoperatively and six months postsurgery using the FJS-12 and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). The baseline and 6-month postoperative scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. The correlation was calculated with Spearman's rho. Both distribution-based approaches and anchor approaches were used to estimate MCID for the FJS-12. The 75th percentile and the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve methods were used to calculate the PASS of FJS-12. Results: MCID estimates for normalized FJS-12 for UKA ranged from 5.68 to 19.82. The threshold of the FJS-12 with ROC method was 72.92 (AUC = 0.76). The cut-off value computed with the 75th percentile approach was 92.71. Conclusions: The MCID and PASS represent valid tools to assess the real perception of clinical improvement in patients who underwent UKA. The MCID value of FJS-12 was 12.5 for patients who underwent UKA. The value of the PASS for the FJS-12 in patients who underwent UKA was 72.92.

A long-term cross-sectional study with modified forgotten joint score to assess the perception of artificial joint after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The ultimate goal for an arthroplasty surgeon is to provide the patient a joint that feels more like a natural joint. The Modified Forgotten Joint Score (MFJS) is a newly introduced functional scoring system that has a superior ability to assess this property among arthroplasty patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term temporal association of the MFJS and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

We assessed 360 patients post TKA with MFJS questionnaire. The patient groups were distributed at follow-up intervals of 3 weeks (n = 55), 6 months (n = 45), 1 year (n = 57), 2 years (n = 40), 3 years (n = 49), 5 years (n = 49), 7 years (n = 39), and 10 years (n = 26). Higher score suggests a forgotten artificial joint.

RESULTS

Post-operative mean MFJS scores were 64.4 ± 7.6 at 3 weeks, 87.7 ± 5.6 at 6 months, 89.2 ± 3.1 at 1 year, 89.9 ± 2.6 at 2 years, 89.4 ± 3.2 at 3 years, 89.1 ± 4 at 5 years, 84.5 ± 8.8 at 7 years, and 82.7 ± 11.9 at 10 years. The score at 3 weeks was significantly lesser than the average scores at other follow-up intervals. The score at 6 months was significantly higher compared to the score at 10 years. The average score at 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years were significantly higher compared to the average score at 7 years and 10 years.

CONCLUSION

The trend of the MFJS score was found to drastically improve from 3 weeks to 6 months and peak in 2 years after which the score tends to attain a plateau up to 5 years following which there is a decline in the score at 7- and 10-years post-surgery. Age did not have an influence on the variation in functional score in any of the follow-up groups. MFJS has a strong positive correlation with the well-recognised KOOS scoring system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.