1
|
Chaudhry F, Daud A, Greenberg A, Braunstein D, Safir OA, Gross AE, Kuzyk PR. Cup-Cage Construct for Treatment of Severe Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at a Mean Follow-Up of 7.7 Years. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39:2555-2560. [PMID: 39002767 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Revised: 06/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acetabular reconstruction in the context of massive acetabular bone loss is challenging. Achieving implant stability in these situations requires special considerations. The cup-cage construct is a treatment option that addresses this issue. This study evaluates survivorship, complications, and functional outcomes using the cup-cage construct. METHODS A total of 131 cup-cage implants (129 patients) were identified from our retrospective review of revision total hip arthroplasties from January 2003 to January 2022. Among these cases, 100 (76.3%) were women, the mean age at the time of surgery was 68 years (range, 29 to 92; SD [SD], 12.4), and the mean follow-up was 7.7 years (range, 0.02 to 20.3; SD, 5.1). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was conducted with failure defined as revision surgery and/or failure of the cup-cage reconstruction. RESULTS At a mean follow-up of 7.7 years, the cup-cage construct survivorship due to all-cause failure was 83.9% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 77.6 to 90.2) at 5 years with 88 hips at risk, 74.8% (95% CI: 66.2 to 83.4) at 10 years with 38 hips at risk, and 69.8% (95% CI: 59.4 to 80.2) at 15 years with 11 hips at risk. The survivorship due to failure from aseptic loosening was 96.7% (95% CI: 93.6 to 99.8) at 5 years with 88 hips at risk and 95.5% (95% CI: 91.6 to 99.4) at 10 and 15 years with 38 and 11 hips at risk, respectively. The revision rate for aseptic loosening of the cup and/or cage, infection, dislocation, and aseptic loosening of the femoral stem was 5 of 131 (3.8%), 12 of 131 (9.1%), 10 of 131 (7.6%), and 2 of 131 (1.5%). CONCLUSIONS The cup-cage construct is a reliable treatment option for the treatment of various acetabular defects. There are favorable survivorship, clinical, and radiographic outcomes, with a satisfactory complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faran Chaudhry
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anser Daud
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arieh Greenberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Doris Braunstein
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Oleg A Safir
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allan E Gross
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul R Kuzyk
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alter TD, Hadley ML, Couch CG, Fruth KM, Bedard NA, Perry KI, Sierra RJ, Lewallen DG. Highly Porous Acetabular Cup and Augment Constructs in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: What Predicts 10-Year Implant Survivorship? J Arthroplasty 2024; 39:S194-S202. [PMID: 38599525 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Porous tantalum acetabular cup and augment constructs have demonstrated favorable outcomes up to 5 years postsurgery despite severe bone loss during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prior literature lacks long-term studies with substantial case numbers. This study aims to assess long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes 10 years postsurgery in patients undergoing revision THA with porous tantalum acetabular cup-augment constructs and determine factors associated with long-term survivorship. METHODS Between 2000 and 2012, 157 revision THAs were performed in cases with major acetabular defects (mainly Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB) utilizing porous tantalum cup-augment constructs. Pelvic discontinuity was noted intraoperatively in 17 hips (11%). Postoperative radiographs were evaluated at regular intervals for implant stability and radiolucent lines. There were 49 patients who had complete radiographic follow-up at 10 years or longer postsurgery. RESULTS The 10-year survivorship free of revision of the cup-augment construct for aseptic loosening was 93%, free of any acetabular construct revision was 91%, free of any hip rerevision was 77%, and free of any reoperation was 75%. Pelvic discontinuity was associated with increased risk of reoperation (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.8), any hip rerevision (HR = 3.2), any cup-augment construct revision (HR = 11.8), and aseptic construct revision (HR = 10.0). Of unrevised cases with radiographs at 10 years, 4 hips showed radiographic loosening. Mean Harris hip scores improved from 47 preoperatively to 79 at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS Porous tantalum acetabular cup-augment constructs used in revision THA with severe acetabular bone loss provide excellent implant survivorship at 10 years when the acetabulum is intact. Due to lower survivorship of cup-augment constructs in cases of pelvic discontinuity, additional construct fixation or stabilization methods are recommended, when a discontinuity is present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas D Alter
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Matthew L Hadley
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Cory G Couch
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kristin M Fruth
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Kevin I Perry
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rafael J Sierra
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - David G Lewallen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Salimy MS, Minutillo GT, Melnic CM, Paprosky WG, Sheth NP. Acetabular Distraction: Promising 5-Year Outcomes for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Discontinuity. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39:S188-S193. [PMID: 38729228 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe acetabular bone loss encountered during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) poses a clinical challenge. In cases involving pelvic discontinuity, where the ilium is separated superiorly from the inferior ischiopubic segment through the acetabulum, acetabular distraction may be used to restore the biomechanics of the hemipelvis. This technique allows for correct sizing of the acetabulum, and the subsequent peripheral distraction and medial compression at the discontinuity provide initial mechanical stability and biological fixation as bone in growth occurs. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess long-term 5-year outcomes following acetabular distraction across 2 institutions. METHODS We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent revision THA in which the acetabular distraction technique was performed for the treatment of chronic pelvic discontinuity between 2002 and 2018. Demographic, operative, and clinical postoperative data were collected. Clinical endpoints included postoperative radiographic outcomes, complications requiring additional surgery, and reoperation for all causes. Only patients who had a minimum 5-year follow-up were included in this study. RESULTS A total of 15 patients (Paprosky IIC: one patient, 6.7%; Paprosky IIIA: 5 patients, 33.3%; Paprosky IIIB: 9 patients, 60%) who had a mean follow-up time of 9 years (range, 5.1 to 13.5) were analyzed. Porous tantalum augments were used in 11 (73.3%) cases to primarily address posteriorsuperior defects (100%). There were 4 (26.7%) patients that required reoperation, only 2 of which were for indications related to the acetabular construct, leading to an overall survivorship of 86.7%. Both patients had a prior revision THA before the implementation of the distraction technique. Evidence of bridging callus formation was reported radiographically for 14 (93.3%) patients at the time of the last clinical follow-up. CONCLUSIONS For patients who have chronic pelvic discontinuity, acetabular distraction shows promising long-term outcomes. Even so, larger multi-center studies are needed to better support the efficacy of this technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi S Salimy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gregory T Minutillo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher M Melnic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts
| | - Wayne G Paprosky
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Neil P Sheth
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Melnic CM, Salimy MS, Minutillo GT, Paprosky WG, Sheth NP. Acetabular Distraction Technique: A Multicenter Study With a Minimum 2-Year Radiographic Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39:S398-S403. [PMID: 38401613 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pelvic discontinuity is a challenge during revision total hip arthroplasty due to the loss of structural continuity of the superior and inferior aspects of the acetabulum from severe acetabular bone loss. Acetabular distraction provides an alternative surgical treatment by stabilizing the acetabular component through elastic recoil of the pelvis, which may be supplemented with modular porous augments for addressing major acetabular defects. This study reports 2-year radiographic findings following acetabular distraction for the treatment of chronic pelvic discontinuity. METHODS Patients undergoing acetabular distraction performed by 5 surgeons from 2002 to 2021 were identified across 5 institutions. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative outcomes, including radiographic component stability, were recorded. There were 53 of 91 (58.2%) patients (5 deceased, 33 lost to follow-up) consisting of 4 Paprosky IIC (7.5%), 8 Paprosky IIIA (15.1%), and 41 Paprosky IIIB (77.4%) defects included, with a mean follow-up time of 4.8 years (range, 2 to 13.5). Modular porous augments were used in 33 (62.3%) cases. Failure was defined as a subsequent revision of the acetabular construct. RESULTS Among the 13 (24.5%) patients who returned to the operating room, 6 (46.2%) had a prior history of revision total hip arthroplasty before undergoing acetabular distraction. Only 5 (9.4%) patients underwent acetabular revision following acetabular distraction, leading to an overall cup survivorship of 90.6%. Of the remaining 48 patients, 46 (95.8%) had evidence of radiographic bridging callus of the chronic pelvic discontinuity at their last clinical follow-up. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, in the largest series to date, acetabular distraction has proven to be a viable treatment for acetabular bone loss with a chronic pelvic discontinuity, with excellent early survivorship and radiographic evidence of bridging callus. Future studies with longer follow-ups are needed to further monitor the efficacy of this technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M Melnic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts
| | - Mehdi S Salimy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gregory T Minutillo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Wayne G Paprosky
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Neil P Sheth
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sanghavi SA, Paprosky WG, Sheth NP. Evaluation and Management of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 10-year Update. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024; 32:e466-e475. [PMID: 38412446 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Acetabular bone loss continues to be one of the most complex and challenging scenarios facing the orthopaedic surgeon. Preoperative planning and classification systems essentially have remained the same, with the Paprosky classification still being the most commonly used. Careful radiological assessment with well-defined criteria can accurately diagnose acetabular bone loss patterns with an associated chronic pelvic discontinuity before surgery. The use of cemented reconstruction techniques has declined, and contemporary practice trends have involved the increasing use of highly porous hemispherical shells in conjunction with modular porous metal augments, which can successfully treat most acetabular revisions. Noncemented treatment options for the management of acetabular bone loss during revision include conventional porous/modular highly porous hemispherical implants, nonmodular highly porous implants with cementable acetabular liners, cup-cage reconstruction, oblong cups, and triflange reconstruction. These options can be combined with modular porous metal augments, structural allografts, impaction grafting, or reconstruction cages. Acetabular distraction is a newer technique for chronic pelvic discontinuity, which is used in conjunction with off-the-shelf revision acetabular shells and modular porous metal augments. This review is an update over the past decade, highlighting studies with mid to long-term follow-up, and presents the advantages, disadvantages, and principles associated with each of the most commonly used reconstructive techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahil A Sanghavi
- From the Department of Arthroplasty, Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pune, Maharashtra, India (Sanghavi), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, RUSH University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (Paprosky), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (Sheth)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wood MJ, Al-Jabri T, Zaghloul A, Lanting B, Giannoudis PV, Hart AJ. Periprosthetic acetabular fractures as a complication of total hip arthroplasty. Injury 2023; 54:111058. [PMID: 37748235 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are rare but potentially devastating complications of total hip arthroplasty. As the number of total hip arthroplasties performed annually increases, so has the incidence of periprosthetic fractures, with the topic being spotlighted more frequently in the orthopaedic community. There is a particular sparsity of literature regarding periprosthetic acetabular fractures, with periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty being traditionally far more commonly reported. This article aims to provide an up-to-date review of the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnostic challenges, classifications, and management strategies for periprosthetic acetabular fractures after total hip arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Wood
- Joint Reconstruction Unit, The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, London, HA7 4LP, United Kingdom
| | - Talal Al-Jabri
- Joint Reconstruction Unit, The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, London, HA7 4LP, United Kingdom; Rorabeck Bourne Joint Replacement Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Ahmed Zaghloul
- Joint Reconstruction Unit, The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, London, HA7 4LP, United Kingdom
| | - Brent Lanting
- Rorabeck Bourne Joint Replacement Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter V Giannoudis
- Academic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Wing, Floor D, Great George Street, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, United Kingdom; NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Alister James Hart
- Joint Reconstruction Unit, The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, London, HA7 4LP, United Kingdom; Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shaarani SR, Jaibaji M, Yaghmour KM, Vles G, Haddad FS, Konan S. Early clinical and radiological outcomes of the new porous titanium shell in combination with locking screw in revision total hip arthroplasty. ARTHROPLASTY 2023; 5:24. [PMID: 37158971 PMCID: PMC10169346 DOI: 10.1186/s42836-023-00177-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Extensive acetabular bone loss and poor bone quality are two key challenges often encountered in revision total hip arthroplasty. A new 3D-printed porous acetabular shell has been made available with the option to insert multiple variable-angle locking screws. We sought to evaluate the early clinical and radiological outcomes of this construct. METHODS A retrospective review of patients operated by two surgeons was performed in a single institution. Fifty-nine revision hip arthroplasties were performed in 55 patients (34 female; mean age 68.8 ± 12.3 years) for Paprosky defects I (n = 21), IIA/B (n = 22), IIC (n = 9), III (n = 7) between February 2018 and January 2022 using the novel porous titanium acetabular shell and multiple variable angle locking screws. Postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes were locally maintained. Patient-reported outcome measures collected included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Oxford Hip Score, and the 12-item Short Form Survey. RESULTS After a mean follow-up of 25.7 ± 13.9 months, two cases of shell migration were noted. One patient had a failed constrained mechanism and received revision to a cemented dual mobility liner. No other acetabular shells showed any evidence of radiographic loosening at the final follow-up. Preoperatively, 21 defects were classified as Paprosky grade I, 19 grade IIA, 3 grade IIB, 9 IIC, 4 grade IIIA, and 3 IIIB. The mean postoperative WOMAC function score was 84 (SD 17), WOMAC (stiffness) 83 (SD 15), WOMAC (pain) 85 (SD 15), and WOMAC (global) 85 (SD 17). The mean postoperative OHS was 83 (SD 15), and mean SF-12 physical score was 44 (SD 11). CONCLUSION The additional augmentation of porous metal acetabular shells with multiple variable-angle locking screws provides reliable initial fixation with good clinical and radiological outcomes in the short term. Further studies are needed to establish the medium- and long-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahril R Shaarani
- Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, University College London Hospital, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
| | | | | | - Georges Vles
- Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, University College London Hospital, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Fares S Haddad
- Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, University College London Hospital, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Sujith Konan
- Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, University College London Hospital, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hinckley NB, Beauchamp CP, Christopher ZK, Schwartz AJ, Ogunleye T, Goulding KA. What are the 2-year survivorship outcomes of custom hemipelvis reconstruction after hemipelvectomy and revision arthroplasty? The evolution of a custom ilium "monoflange". J Surg Oncol 2023; 127:480-489. [PMID: 36255157 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in machined and three-dimensionally (3D) printed implant technology have allowed for customized complex pelvic reconstructions. We sought to determine the survivorship of custom hemipelvis reconstruction using ilium-only fixation at a minimum 2-year follow-up, their modes of failure, and the postoperative complications resulting from the procedure. METHODS A retrospective review identified 12 consecutive patients treated with custom hemipelvis reconstruction. Indications for surgery were bone tumor requiring internal hemipelvectomy (four patients) or multiply revised, failed hip arthroplasty with massive bone loss (eight patients). All patients had a minimum of 2-year follow-up with a mean of 60.5 months. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was determined for all patients. Postoperative complications and reoperations were categorized for all patients. RESULTS At a mean of 60.5 months, 11 of 12 patients had retained their custom implant (92% survivorship). One implant was removed as a result of an acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). There were no cases of aseptic loosening. Seven of 12 patients required reoperation (three PJI; two dislocations; two superficial wound complications), with five patients going on to reoperation-free survival. CONCLUSIONS Custom hemipelvis reconstruction utilizing an ilium monoflange provides durable short-term fixation at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Reoperation for infection and dislocation is common.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Adam J Schwartz
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Temi Ogunleye
- Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA
| | - Krista A Goulding
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Siddiqi A, Mahmoud Y, Rullán PJ, McLaughlin JP, Molloy RM, Piuzzi NS. Management of Periprosthetic Acetabular Fractures: A Critical Analysis and Review of the Literature. JBJS Rev 2022; 10:01874474-202208000-00003. [PMID: 35959937 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.22.00073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
➢ Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are uncommon and infrequently the focus of studies. ➢ Acetabular fractures are occasionally recognized postoperatively when patients report unremitting groin pain weeks after surgery. ➢ The widespread use of cementless acetabular cups might lead to a higher number of fractures than are clinically detectable. ➢ Appropriate recognition, including mindfulness of preoperative patient and surgical risk factors, is critical to the successful management of acetabular complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Siddiqi
- Division of Adult Reconstruction, Orthopaedic Institute Brielle Orthopaedics, Manasquan, New Jersey
| | - Yusuf Mahmoud
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, New Jersey
| | - Pedro J Rullán
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John P McLaughlin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Robert M Molloy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nicolas S Piuzzi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|