Clinical Outcomes of a Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty Prosthesis Compared to Its Predecessor at 5-Year Follow-Up: Matched Pair Analysis

Combining various acupuncture therapies with multimodal analgesia to enhance postoperative pain management following total knee arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various acupuncture treatments in conjunction with multimodal analgesia (MA) for managing postoperative pain and improving knee function in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), based on the findings from clinical research indicating the potential benefits of acupuncture-related therapies in this context.

Methods

We searched Web of Science, PubMed, SCI-hub, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, and Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP) to collect randomized controlled trials of acupuncture-related therapies for post-TKA pain. After independent screening and data extraction, the quality of the included literature was evaluated. The potential for bias in the studies incorporated in the analysis was assessed according to the guidelines outlined in the Cochrane Handbook 5.1. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 16.0 software, with primary outcome measures including visual analog scale (VAS), pain pressure threshold (PPT), hospital for special surgery knee score (HSS), and knee joint range of motion (ROM). Furthermore, the interventions were ranked based on the SUCRA value.

Results

We conducted an analysis of 41 qualifying studies encompassing 3,003 patients, examining the efficacy of four acupuncture therapies (acupuncture ACU, electroacupuncture EA, transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation TEAS, and auricular acupoint therapy AAT) in conjunction with multimodal analgesia (MA) and MA alone. The VAS results showed no significant difference in efficacy among the five interventions for VAS-3 score. However, TEAS+MA (SMD: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.01, 1.32) was more effective than MA alone for VAS-7 score. There was no significant difference in PPT score among the three interventions. ACU + MA (SMD: 6.45; 95%CI: 3.30, 9.60), EA + MA (SMD: 4.89; 95%CI: 1.46, 8.32), and TEAS+MA (SMD: 5.31; 95%CI: 0.85, 9.78) were found to be more effective than MA alone for HSS score. For ROM score, ACU + MA was more efficacious than EA + MA, TEAS+MA, and AAT + MA, MA. Regarding the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions, nausea and vomiting were more prevalent after using only MA. Additionally, the incidence of postoperative dizziness and drowsiness following ACU + MA (OR = 4.98; 95%CI: 1.01, 24.42) was observed to be higher compared to that after AAT + MA intervention. Similarly, the occurrence of dizziness and drowsiness after MA was found to be significantly higher compared to the following interventions: TEAS+MA (OR = 0.36; 95%CI: 0.18, 0.70) and AAT + MA (OR = 0.20; 95%CI: 0.08, 0.50). The SUCRA ranking indicated that ACU + MA, EA + MA, TEAS+MA, and AAT + MA displayed superior SUCRA scores for each outcome index, respectively.

Conclusion

For the clinical treatment of post-TKA pain, acupuncture-related therapies can be selected as a complementary and alternative therapy. EA + MA and TEAS+MA demonstrate superior efficacy in alleviating postoperative pain among TKA patients. ACU + MA is the optimal choice for promoting postoperative knee joint function recovery in TKA patients. AAT + MA is recommended for preventing postoperative adverse reactions.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, identifier (CRD42023492859).

Does lucency equate to revision? A five-year retrospective review of Attune and Triathlon total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The Attune® total knee arthroplasty system was introduced in 2013 to address lingering issues of patient dissatisfaction. However, recent literature reports concerns of early tibial tray debonding. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of radiolucent lines, survivorship and patient reported outcome-measures between the Attune® system and the well-established Triathlon® system.

METHODS

This retrospective database review was conducted at a single institution in Cork, Ireland. All primary Attune® (N = 445) and Triathlon® (N = 285) systems implanted between 2015 and 2016 were reviewed. Radiolucent lines were assessed for those with a minimum two-year radiological follow-up (Attune® = 338; Triathlon® = 231). X-rays were taken post op, at 6 months, 2 years and 5 years. Radiolucent lines were documented using the Modern Knee Society Radiographic System. Five-year survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis with the Log Rank method to determine statistical significance. The Oxford Knee Score and EQ-5D-5L, were collected pre-op, at 6 months, 2 years and 5 years post-operatively and compared using the Kruskal-Wallis Test.

RESULTS

The Attune® had a higher proportion of radiolucent lines at the tibial tray [87.1% (54/62) vs 61.4% (27/44); p = 0.001] and at the implant-cement interface [62.9% (39/62) vs 43.2% (19/44); p = 0.02]. Conversely, the Triathlon® had a higher proportion AT the femur [38.6% (17/44) vs 12.9% (8/62); p = 0.001] and at the cement-bone interface [56.8% (25/44) vs 37.1% (23/62); p = 0.02]. The overall frequency of radiolucent lines was similar in both the Attune® and Triathlon® groups [17.8%, (60/338) vs 17.7%, (41/231); p = 0.49]. There was no difference in revision-free survival analysis at 5 years (Attune® 97.8% vs Triathlon® 95.8%; p = 0.129). The Attune® performed better at 5 years in the Oxford Knee Score [Attune® = 42.6 (SD 5.2) vs Triathlon® = 41 (SD 6.4); p = 0.001] and in the EQ-5D [Attune® = 0.773 (SD 0.187) vs Triathlon® = 0.729 (SD 0.218); p = 0.013]. There was no difference at 5 years in the EQ-VAS [Attune® = 80.4 (SD 13.7) vs Triathlon® = 78.5 (SD 15.3); p = 0.25].

CONCLUSION

The Attune® system exhibited a higher incidence of  radiolucent lines at the tibial tray. However, this did not lead to decreased survivorship at medium term follow-up compared to the Triathlon®. Furthermore, improvements in patient reported outcomes modestly favoured the Attune® system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Modern implants in total knee arthroplasty are more patellofemoral joint friendly compared to their traditional design: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Implant designs for total knee arthroplasties (TKA) are continuously evolving to improve outcomes and satisfaction rates after TKA. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the evidence in the literature regarding the outcomes of the Attune knee system over the PFC Sigma knee design and investigate the advantage of one over the other.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies till August 2021 was performed using the defined eligibility criteria. This was a systematic review of the literature published in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Library, PUBMED, and EMBASE. The analysis included prospective and retrospective comparative trials comparing TKA by PFC sigma or Attune posterior stabilized (PS) or cruciate-retaining (CR), fixed bearing, or rotating platform systems. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and postoperative patellar complications were analysed in the studies utilizing attune knee system (modern implants) to its counterpart PFC sigma (traditional implants) for TKA. Quality assessment was conducted using NIH Quality Assessment Tool for controlled intervention studies (RCTs and case-control studies).

RESULTS

This review included 3 RCTs and the rest, 10 of which were non-RCT, including 5852 patients. ATTUNE designs suggested a statistically significant improvement in KSS over PFC Sigma designs. Other PROMs such as OKS and WOMAC scores yielded comparable results between the two groups. ATTUNE knee prosthesis did not result in better knee range of motion, patient satisfaction, or radiological outcomes than the PFC design. Regarding the complications, attune knee prosthesis demonstrated favourable results over PFC Sigma for anterior knee pain and patellofemoral (PF) crepitus.

CONCLUSIONS

The present systematic review highlights better KSS and lesser chances of PF complications favouring a modern implant design over its traditional counterpart. Other patient-reported outcome analyses at a short-term follow-up period were comparable among patients undergoing total knee replacements with two different implant designs. Radiological outcomes for component positioning also suggested similar results among the two groups.

Clinical advantages of gradually reducing radius versus multi-radius total knee arthroplasty: a noninferiority randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The rationale for gradually reducing radius (GR) femoral component aims to prevent flexion instability by gradually change the center of femoral rotation, unlike a discrete change by the multi-radius (MR) which is more common for most of total knee arthroplasties (TKA). However, no strong evidence has been reported the clinical significance of the GR design.

METHODS

This patient-blinded, parallel, non-inferiority trial conducted between January 2018-December 2020. Patients with knee osteoarthritis consented for cruciate retaining TKA were randomly allocated to a GR or MR group. Primary outcome measures were knee functions at postoperative 6 and 12 months using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Secondary outcome measures were performance-based tests (30-s chair stand test, 40-m fast paced walk test, and 3-m timed up and go test), and knee motions.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled and randomized; GR (n = 30) and MR (n = 30) group. The changes of KOOS at 6 and 12 months from baseline showed clinical meaningful for both GR and MR group. At 6 and 12 months postoperatively, there was no significant difference between both groups in all KOOS subscales. The length of stay was not different between GR and MR group (5.93 ± 1.44 vs 6.17 ± 1.86 days, p = 0.59). Patients on both groups presented similar performance-based tests. However, the improvement in degrees of knee motion for the GR group was significantly greater than the MR group (34.67 ± 12.52 vs 23.67 ± 12.59, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

GR was noninferiority to MR for the functional outcomes and performances after TKA. The GR femoral component gave more knee motions than did the MR prostheses.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Safety and Efficacy of Single Condylar Knee Prosthesis When Treating Knee Single Compartment Osteoarthritis: A Prospective, Case-Randomized Controlled Study

Objective. The aim of this study is to explore the safety and efficacy of single condylar knee prosthesis when treating knee single compartment osteoarthritis by measuring the decrease of hemoglobin, total postoperative blood loss, maximum reduction of HCT, and knee joint activity. Methods. A total of 80 patients with knee joint single compartment osteoarthritis treated in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were studied. They were randomly assigned to a study group (n = 40) and a control group (n = 40). The study group was treated with total knee prosthesis, while the control group was treated with simple knee prosthesis. The decrease rate of hemoglobin, the amount of bleeding, and the maximum decrease of hematocrit were compared after treatment. The range of motion of knee joint was evaluated by the Fugl-Meyer motor function scale (FM-B) and Berg balance scale (BBS). Results. The decrease of hemoglobin in the study group at 24 hours, 36 hours, and 48 hours after treatment was remarkably lower ( $P$  < 0.05). The total blood loss and the maximum reduction of hematocrit(HCT) in the study group were lower ( $P$  < 0.05). The range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint in the study group at 6 and 12 months after treatment was remarkably higher than that before treatment and remarkably higher compared to the control group ( $P$  < 0.05). The FM-B scale and BBS scale of the studied cohort at 6 and 12 months after treatment were remarkably higher than those before treatment and were remarkably higher compared to the control’s ( $P$  < 0.05). Conclusion. The unicondylar knee prosthesis is safer and more effective in the treatment of noncompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee, facilitating less trauma and perioperative blood loss and enhancing the patient’s motion and balance.

Comparison of Functional Outcomes, Femoral Rollback and Sagittal Stability of Anterior-Stabilized Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has improved leaps and bounds in terms of design to improve clinical outcomes and achieve better rehabilitation of the patients. Ultra-congruent inserts (UC) were designed to replace the need for posterior stabilized (PS) implants. The purpose of this review was to evaluate clinical outcomes, femoral rollback, functional scores, range of motion, sagittal laxity, complication rates, and isokinetic performance between UC and PS TKA among RCTs.

METHODS

Electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, opengrey, and Cochrane were searched from date of inception up to mid-April 2021, and meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA guidelines. This study analyzed outcomes, femoral rollback, tibial sagittal laxity and isokinetic performance.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs identified 852 knees, of which 420 underwent UC TKAs and 432 underwent PS TKA. Compared to UC TKA, a significantly better sagittal stability (p = 0.17) and femoral rollback (p < 0.00001) in PS TKAs was noted, although no statistically significant difference was found in the assessment of the range of motion (p = 0.19) and functional scores. Both the groups had similar isokinetic performance with extensor torque (p = 0.97) and flexor torque (p = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude with the current meta-analysis that there are no added benefits for UC over PS inserts and these inserts have a higher sagittal laxity and less femoral roll back in cruciate sacrificing UC knee. But since there are no long-term wear data, UC inserts with CS technique should be used cautiously and may be used only when the PCL cannot be balanced adequately. There is no evidence or only a few to support the superiority of the AS TKA in terms of clinical outcomes or isokinetic performance or femoral external rotation over PS TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

Midterm functional recovery of Total knee arthroplasty patients compared between the ATTUNE knee system and the press fit condylar (PFC) SIGMA knee system

BACKGROUND

The ATTUNE Knee System is a new prosthetic design that has theoretical advantages over the Press Fit Condylar (PFC) Sigma Knee System specific to improved knee kinematics and patellofemoral joint tracking. This study aimed to evaluate functional outcomes compared between the ATTUNE and PFC Sigma designs at a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who received either the ATTUNE or PFC Sigma system during November 2013 to February 2015 at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand). Functional outcomes were evaluated using Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, 2-min walk test (2MWT), modified knee score, numerical rating scale-pain, range of motion (ROM), and rate of anterior knee pain and crepitation at preoperation, 3-months, 1-year, and 5-years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of 113 patients, 59 and 54 received the PFC Sigma and ATTUNE systems, respectively. At a minimum of 5-years follow-up, all functional outcomes improved significantly from the preoperative period although TUG test and 2MWT declined significantly from 1- to 5-years postoperatively only in the PFC Sigma group. The mean ROM at 5-years postoperatively was significantly higher in ATTUNE than in PFC Sigma; however, the difference was small (116° vs. 110°, respectively; p = 0.041). There were no significant differences in any of the other outcome measurements, including anterior knee pain, clunking, and crepitation, between groups at any study time point.

CONCLUSIONS

​Our results revealed no major differences in functional outcomes between the PFC Sigma and ATTUNE TKA designs at an intermediate-term follow-up of at least 5 years. Longer-term follow-up study is needed to evaluate the benefits of the ATTUNE design relative to polyethylene wear and the rate of aseptic loosening.