Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Review of Demographics and Management

Can Periprosthetic Joint Infection of Tumor Prostheses Be Controlled With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention?

BACKGROUND

Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients who have undergone segmental replacement of the distal femur or proximal tibia after tumor resection can be associated with considerable morbidity, pain, and risk of complications because the procedure often results in removal of long, well-fixed stems from the diaphysis. A less-aggressive surgical approach, such as debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), may be attractive to patients and surgeons because of less morbidity, but the likelihood of eradicating infection in comparison to the traditional two-stage revision is not well established for oncology patients. Furthermore, the relative risk of subsequent amputation for DAIR versus two-stage revision has not been defined for this population.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) How does DAIR compare with two-stage revision in terms of infection control for patients with distal femoral or proximal tibial segmental modular endoprostheses? (2) Is DAIR as an initial procedure associated with an increased risk of amputation compared with two-stage revision for infection?

METHODS

From the longitudinally maintained orthopaedic oncology surgical database at our institution, we identified 69 patients who had been treated for a clinical diagnosis of PJI at the knee between 1993 and 2015. We excluded 32% (22) of patients who did not meet at least one of the major criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) for PJI, 3% (2) of patients who underwent immediate amputation, 3% (2) of patients who had a follow-up time of < 24 months, and 7% (5) of patients who did not have a primary tumor of the distal femur or proximal tibia. The study consisted of 38 patients, of whom eight underwent two-stage revision, 26 underwent DAIR, and four underwent extended DAIR (removal of all segmental components but with retention of stems and components fixed in bone) for their initial surgical procedure. To be considered free of infection, patients had to meet MSIS standards, including no positive cultures, drainage, or surgical debridement for a minimum of 2 years from the last operation. Factors associated with time-dependent risk of infection relapse, clearance, amputation, and patient survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves and the log-rank test to compare factors. Association of demographic and treatment factors was assessed using chi-square and Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

Continuous infection-free survival at 5 years was 16% (95% CI 2% to 29%) for patients undergoing DAIR compared with 75% (95% CI 45% to 100%) for patients undergoing two-stage revision (p = 0.006). The median (range) number of total surgical procedures was 3 per patient (1 to 10) for DAIR and 2 (2 to 5) for two-stage revision. Twenty-nine percent (11 of 38) of patients eventually underwent amputation. Survival without amputation was 69% (95% CI 51% to 86%) for DAIR compared with 88% (95% CI 65% to 100%) for two-stage revision at 5 years (p = 0.34). The cumulative proportion of patients achieving infection-free status (> 2 years continuously after last treatment) and limb preservation was 58% (95% CI 36% to 80%) for patients initially treated with DAIR versus 87% (95% CI 65% to 100%) for patients first treated with two-stage revision (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Infection control was better with two-stage revision than DAIR. The chance of eventual clearance of infection with limb preservation was better when two-stage revision was chosen as the initial treatment. However, the loss to follow-up in the two-stage revision group would likely make the true proportion of infection control lower than our estimate. Our experience would suggest that the process of infection eradication is a complex and difficult one. Most patients undergo multiple operations. Nearly one-third of patients eventually underwent amputation, and this was a serious risk for both groups. While we cannot strongly recommend one approach over the other based on our data, we would still consider the use of DAIR in patients who present with acute short duration of symptoms (< 3 weeks), no radiographic signs of erosion around fixed implants, and organisms other than Staphylococcus aureus. We would advocate the extended DAIR procedure with removal of all segmental or modular components, and we would caution patients that there is a high likelihood of needing further surgery. A prospective trial with strict adherence to indications may be needed to evaluate the relative merits of an extended DAIR procedure versus a two-stage revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Ninety-day postoperative mortality and complications in continuous and unselected single-stage revisions for chronic periprosthetic joint infection

PURPOSE

Single-stage revision has gained significant attention as a major surgical approach for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, the 90-day mortality and complication profile of single-stage revision is poorly characterized. The purposes of this study were to determine the incidence rates of and identify the risk factors for 90-day postoperative mortality and complications of single-stage revision for chronic PJI.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent single-stage revision for PJI between August 2000 and May 2022. Patient demographics, 90-day mortality, and postoperative complications were recorded. Complications were categorized into systemic and local complications. Patients in this study were further categorized into knee and hip revision groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify significant independent predictors of the outcome measures.

RESULTS

348 patients (144 knees and 204 hips) were included in this study. The 90-day mortality rate was 0.9%. The incidence rates of postoperative complications in knee and hip surgeries were 31.3% and 19.6%, respectively. The most common complication was deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was the independent predictor of mortality. In the knee revision group, fungal infection was identified as the independent predictor of recurrent PJI; regular alcohol use was predictive of wound dehiscence. Among hip PJI patients, age ≥ 80 years was independently associated with DVT; RA was found to be a predictor of dislocation and wound dehiscence.

CONCLUSION

For continuous and unselected patients with chronic PJI, single-stage revision demonstrated a satisfactory 90-day mortality. Nevertheless, the 90-day postoperative complication rates after single-stage revision in both knee and hip groups were relatively high.

Diagnostic Performance of a Molecular Assay in Synovial Fluid Targeting Dominant Prosthetic Joint Infection Pathogens

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most serious complications of joint replacement surgery among orthopedic surgeries and occurs in 1 to 2% of primary surgeries. Additionally, the cause of PJIs is mostly bacteria from the Staphylococcus species, accounting for more than 98%, while fungi cause PJIs in only 1 to 2% of cases and can be difficult to manage. The current gold-standard microbiological method of culturing synovial fluid is time-consuming and produces false-negative and -positive results. This study aimed to identify a novel, accurate, and convenient molecular diagnostic method. The DreamDX primer-hydrolysis probe set was designed for the pan-bacterial and pan-fungal detection of DNA from pathogens that cause PJIs. The sensitivity and specificity of DreamDX primer-hydrolysis probes were 88.89% (95% CI, 56.50-99.43%) and 97.62% (95% CI, 87.68-99.88%), respectively, compared with the microbiological method of culturing synovial fluid, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9974 (*** p < 0.0001). It could be concluded that the DreamDX primer-hydrolysis probes have outstanding potential as a molecular diagnostic method for identifying the causative agents of PJIs, and that host inflammatory markers are useful as adjuvants in the diagnosis of PJIs.

Analysis of epidemiological and clinical aspects in cases of fungal osteomyelitis caused by non-Candida species

Osteomyelitis caused by non-Candida species is rare and often neglected, and current recommendations are based on primarily clinical experience and expert opinion. The objective of this study was to describe a case series of non-Candida fungal osteomyelitis. This retrospective study included 10 patients with non-Candida fungal osteomyelitis. Patients with osteomyelitis and microbiologically confirmed non-Candida species from bone fragment cultures were selected from the institution Infection Control Board database. Fusarium spp. were the most commonly isolated fungus from bone fragment cultures in five patients (50%). The majority did not present immunosuppression. The most common etiology was post-traumatic (n = 7, 70%), particularly open fractures. All patients were treated with antifungals associated with surgery. The antifungals used were itraconazole in five patients (50%), and voriconazole in another five patients (50%), with a median duration of antifungal therapy of four weeks (range: 3-25). There were no observed deaths within 30 days and one year. An antifungal approach combined with surgical treatment demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes, including low mortality rates and effective remission.

Surgical procedures for the treatment of fungal periprosthetic infection following hip arthroplasty: a systematic scoping review

Background

There has been limited literature synthesizing the therapeutic effects of surgical procedures for fungal periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following hip arthroplasty. The authors' current study aims to comprehensively review and analyze those relevant literature, and carefully make recommendations for future clinical practices.

Methods

Our current study was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement. Studies regarding the surgical management of fungal PJI following hip arthroplasty were collected via a thorough search of PubMed, Embase and Google scholar databases. The search was lastly performed in March 2023. Non-English language, reviews, articles with duplicated data, and articles without clear information about the type of fungal pathogens and treatment options were excluded. The authors evaluated their systematic review compliance by using AMSTAR 2 criteria and fell in moderate quality. Clinical outcomes of different surgical procedures were evaluated, and a binary logistic regression model was used to identify the risks associated with treatment failure. Data analyses were performed using the SPSS version 19.0.

Results

A total of 33 articles encompassing 80 patients with fungal PJI following hip arthroplasty were identified. Candida albicans was the most frequently isolated fungus (56.3%, 45/80). The overall treatment success was achieved in 71.1% (54/76) of the reported cases. Univariate analysis showed that the differences of success rate were not significant between publication periods, genders, ages, specimen collection methods, and fungal pathogens. Treatment success rate was 47.4% (9/19) in fungal PJI cases with bacterial co-infection, significantly lower than those without [vs. 79.0% (45/57), P=0.017]. The pooled success rate for surgical debridement, spacer implantation, resection arthroplasty, one-stage revision, and two-stage revision was 50.0% (4/8), 42.9% (3/7), 55.0% (11/20), 86.7% (13/15), and 88.5% (23/26), respectively, with significant differences between them (P=0.009). A binary logistic regression model showed that bacterial co-infection and surgical option were the two significant risk factors associated with treatment failure for fungal PJI following hip arthroplasty.

Discussion

Regarding the surgical treatment of fungal PJI following hip arthroplasty, patients with bacterial co-infection, and those treated with surgical procedures such as debridement, spacer implantation, and resection arthroplasty should be aware of the higher risks of failure. Nonetheless, future multiple-centre cohort studies are required to establish the optimal treatment.

Fungal Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Fungal prosthetic joint infections comprise less than 1% of prosthetic joint infections. Thus, little is known regarding optimal management. This study aims to characterize the microbiology, surgical and medical management, and outcomes for these complex infections. The objectives of this study were to assess the impact of surgical approach, antifungal treatment, fungal species, and time to onset of infection from initial surgery on patient outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective record review over 12 years was performed in two health systems that included patients with a deep culture positive for a fungal isolate and the presence of a prosthetic joint. A literature review was performed using the same inclusion criteria. A total of 289 cases were identified and analyzed.

RESULTS

Candida was the most common isolate, and a two-stage revision was the most commonly employed surgical modality. The type of surgical intervention had a statistically significant relationship with outcome (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-stage revision with extended antifungal therapy is preferred in these infections due to higher rates of positive outcomes.

Periprosthetic bacterial and fugal infection after total knee arthroplasty with one-stage debridement: a case report

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic infection is a serious complication after arthroplasty and is characterized by a long duration, recurrence, and a low cure rate. Although fungal infections are infrequent, they are often catastrophic, with an insidious onset, a long duration, atypical clinical symptoms, and imaging features in the early stage. They are easily misdiagnosed, or the diagnosis is missed, resulting in wrong treatment approaches.

CASE PRESENTATION

This paper reports a case involving a 62-year-old female patient of Korean ethnicity with a periprosthetic infection after knee arthroplasty who underwent joint debridement. A preoperative metagenomic next-generation sequencing of joint aspirate revealed Staphylococcus epidermidis. However, postsurgical tissue cultures confirmed the fungal infection. The patient received oral voriconazole and intra-articular injection of voriconazole for antifungal treatment. Since bacterial infection could not be ruled out, we also prescribed levofloxacin. No infection recurrence was observed after more than 22 months of follow-up. In the treatment of this patient, successful short-term follow-up was achieved, but long-term efficacy still cannot be determined.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the case study, we provide an analysis of the diagnosis and treatment of fungal infection after arthroplasty, especially the efficacy of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention for a short-term outcome.

Use of Biomaterials in 3D Printing as a Solution to Microbial Infections in Arthroplasty and Osseous Reconstruction

The incidence of microbial infections in orthopedic prosthetic surgeries is a perennial problem that increases morbidity and mortality, representing one of the major complications of such medical interventions. The emergence of novel technologies, especially 3D printing, represents a promising avenue of development for reducing the risk of such eventualities. There are already a host of biomaterials, suitable for 3D printing, that are being tested for antimicrobial properties when they are coated with bioactive compounds, such as antibiotics, or combined with hydrogels with antimicrobial and antioxidant properties, such as chitosan and metal nanoparticles, among others. The materials discussed in the context of this paper comprise beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP), hydroxyapatite, lithium disilicate glass, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF), poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC), and zirconia. While the recent research results are promising, further development is required to address the increasing antibiotic resistance exhibited by several common pathogens, the potential for fungal infections, and the potential toxicity of some metal nanoparticles. Other solutions, like the incorporation of phytochemicals, should also be explored. Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) in the development of certain orthopedic implants and the potential use of AI against bacterial infections might represent viable solutions to these problems. Finally, there are some legal considerations associated with the use of biomaterials and the widespread use of 3D printing, which must be taken into account.

Two-Stage Treatment Protocol of Fungal Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections: the Clinical Experience from a Single Center Experience

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To evaluate the clinical results and safety of fungal periprosthetic joint Infections (fPJIs) using two-stage treatment protocol.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

8 patients with fPJIs (3 hips and 5 knees) using two-stage revision were reviewed retrospectively and followed up at least 2 years. The preoperative demographic data, two-stage treatment protocol, results of microbiology and histologic workup and postoperative follow-up results (reimplantation success rate and infection free time) were recorded.

RESULTS

7 patients got successful reimplantation, with a 75% reimplantation success rate. Two patients got knee arthrodesis eventually. All patients were infection free with a median follow-up of 4.0 ± 2.0 years (range, 2-7 years). Of them, Candida species were found in 7 patients, while non-Candida specimen was only isolated in 1 patient with Aspergillus. Only 2 patients had coexisting bacterial infection (Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Proteus mirabilis respectively). The average interval between the initial surgery and diagnosis of fPJIs was 21.50±34.79 months (range, 4-104 months). The mean time of spacer implantation was 7.75±2.77 months (range, 6-14 months). None serious complication or above knee amputation was found.

DISCUSSION

fPJIs are very rare and considerable challenge after total hip or knee arthroplasty. The goal of therapy is to eradicate local infection and maintain function. Candida species were the most common pathogen. The duration between spacer placement and staged reimplantation was highly variable, and generally dependent upon the results of joint aspirates and infl ammatory markers. The current study shows that the two-stage treatment protocol is recommended for fungal periprosthetic hip and knee joint infections.

CONCLUSIONS

The two-stage treatment protocol is recommended for fungal periprosthetic hip and knee joint infections. The safety and effi cacy of biantibiotical impregnated (antifungal + antibiotics) cement spacer is confi rmed. Further evidence-based work is needed to determine the optimal drug dose and reimplantation time.

KEY WORDS

two-stage treatment protocol, fungal periprosthetic infections, hip spacer, knee spacer.

Synergistic effect of chlorhexidine and azoles on candida biofilm on titanium surface

BACKGROUND

Candida infections of orthopedic implants are one of the most detrimental orthopedic implant-related complications with unsuccessful treatment and a poor prognosis. Most orthopedic Candida infections form biofilms and have resistance to the commonly used antifungal agents. This study aimed to develop a novel combination of normally prescribed drugs against Candida biofilm on orthopedic implants.

METHODS

We cultured 26 clinical isolates of Candida strains to form biofilm without titanium sheets or on titanium sheets, which are the most commonly used materials for permanent or orthopedic implants. The checkerboard method was used to evaluate the synergistic effects of chlorhexidine (CHL) and azoles on these Candida biofilms. For the evaluation of synergistic effects, we constructed the cell viability assay by fluorescence staining and CFU reduction hot map of Candida.

RESULTS

Twenty-six clinical isolates of Candida strains formed biofilm in 96-well plates without titanium sheets, and we selected 9 of them to form biofilm on titanium sheets in 24-well plates. In Candida biofilm formed in 96-wells, the synergistic rates of CHL with fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole were 61% (16/26), 65% (17/26), and 23% (6/26), respectively. When compared to the blank control group, CHL monotherapy significantly inhibited biofilm formation on titanium sheets (P < 0.05). We demonstrated 100% synergistic rates of the CHL and fluconazole combination against Candida biofilm formation on titanium sheets, and the minimum inhibitory concentration of CHL and FLU decreased four- to eight-fold.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that CHL combined with azoles inhibited the Candida biofilm formation 96-wells or on titanium sheets and has the potential to control the infections of orthopedic implants.

Treatment and Outcomes of Fungal Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Systematic Review of 225 Cases

BACKGROUND

Fungal prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) after a total joint arthroplasty are a rare, yet severe, occurrence not often reported in the literature. Unlike in bacterial PJIs, no clear consensus exists on fungal PJI optimal management.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using the PubMed and Embase databases. Manuscripts were assessed for inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist was applied for quality assessment. Individual demographic, clinical, and treatment information was retrieved from included manuscripts.

RESULTS

Seventy one patients who had a PJI of the hip and 126 of the knee were included. Infection recurrence occurred in 29.6% and 18.3% of patients with hip or knee PJI, respectively. Patients who had knee PJIs recurrence had a significantly higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). For knee PJIs, infection recurrence was more common in patients with Candida albicans (CA) PJIs (P = .022). Two-stage exchange arthroplasty was the most common procedure in both joints. Multivariate analysis found that CCI ≥ 3 was associated with an 18.5-fold increase in the risk of knee PJI recurrence (Odds ratio [OR] = 18.57). Additional risk factors for recurrence in the knee included CA etiology (OR = 3.56) and C-reactive protein at presentation ≥ 6 (OR = 6.54). Compared to debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention, 2-stage procedure was a protective factor for PJI recurrence in the knee (OR = 0.18). No risk factors were found in patients who had hip PJIs.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of fungal PJIs varies widely, but 2-stage revision is the most common. Risk factors for knee fungal PJI recurrence include elevated CCI, infection by CA, and high C-reactive protein at presentation.

Our current clinical understanding of Candida biofilms: where are we two decades on?

Clinically we have been aware of the concept of Candida biofilms for many decades, though perhaps without the formal designation. Just over 20 years ago the subject emerged on the back of progress made from the bacterial biofilms, and academic progress pace has continued to mirror the bacterial biofilm community, albeit at a decreased volume. It is apparent that Candida species have a considerable capacity to colonize surfaces and interfaces and form tenacious biofilm structures, either alone or in mixed species communities. From the oral cavity, to the respiratory and genitourinary tracts, wounds, or in and around a plethora of biomedical devices, the scope of these infections is vast. These are highly tolerant to antifungal therapies that has a measurable impact on clinical management. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overight of our current clinical understanding of where these biofilms cause infections, and we discuss existing and emerging antifungal therapies and strategies.

The effect and mechanism of iodophors on the adhesion and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms attached to artificial joint materials

BACKGROUND

Iodophors are known to be a treatment for biofilm-related periprosthetic joint infection. However, the efficacy and mechanism of eradicating biofilms from different artificial joint materials after iodophor treatment are unknown. This study was conducted to understand the effect and mechanism of iodophors with respect to the adhesion and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms attached to artificial joint materials.

METHODS

Biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus strains were grown on titanium alloy, cobalt chromium molybdenum and polyethylene coupons, which are commonly used materials for artificial joints, for 24 h. Afterward, all coupons were divided into experimental and control groups: (1) exposed to a 0.5 ± 0.05% iodophor for 5 min and (2) exposed to phosphate-buffered saline for 5 min. To gauge the level of biofilm, colony forming units (CFU), live/dead staining confocal microscopy and crystal violet staining were used. Meanwhile, the expression of icaACDR and clfA, which are related to virulence and adhesion, was examined in both the experimental and control groups.

RESULTS

A roughly three-log decrease in CFU/cm2 was seen in the viable plate count compared to the control group. Confocal imaging and crystal violet staining verified the CFU data. Moreover, the expression of icaACDR was reduced on three different orthopaedic implant materials, and the expression of clfA was also inhibited on titanium alloy coupons exposed to the iodophor.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that exposure to an iodophor for 5 min could significantly eliminate biofilms. When Staphylococcus aureus that had adhered to these three materials, which were used for artificial joints, was treated with an iodophor for 5 min, the expression of icaACDR was significantly reduced. This provides strong evidence for clinically clearing periprosthetic joint infections without removing the artificial joints.

Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee represents a severe complication after 1.5% to 2% of primary total knee replacement. Although two-stage revision was considered the gold-standard treatment for PJI of the knee, in the last decades, more studies reported the outcomes of one-stage revisions. This systematic review aims to assess reinfection rate, infection-free survival after reoperation for recurrent infection, and the microorganisms involved in both primary and recurrent infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review of all studies reporting the outcome of one-stage revision for PJI of the knee up to September 2022, according to PRISMA criteria and AMSTAR2 guidelines, was performed. Patient demographics, clinical, surgical, and postoperative data were recorded.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42022362767.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies with a total of 881 one-stage revisions for PJI of the knee were analyzed. A reinfection rate of 12.2% after an average follow-up of 57.6 months was reported. The most frequent causative microorganism were gram-positive bacteria (71.1%), gram-negative bacteria (7.1%), and polymicrobial infections (8%). The average postoperative knee society score was 81.5, and the average postoperative knee function score was 74.2. The infection-free survival after treatment for recurrent infection was 92.1%. The causative microorganisms at reinfections differed significantly from the primary infection (gram-positive 44.4%, gram-negative 11.1%).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent a one-stage revision for PJI of the knee showed a reinfection rate lower or comparable to other surgical treatments as two-stage or DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention). Reoperation for reinfection demonstrates a lower success compared to one-stage revision. Moreover, microbiology differs between primary infection and recurrent infection. Level of evidence Level IV.

Systemic antibiotics are not required for successful two-stage revision hip arthroplasty

The duration of systemic antibiotic treatment following first-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is contentious. Our philosophy is to perform an aggressive debridement, and to use a high local concentration of targeted antibiotics in cement beads and systemic prophylactic antibiotics alone. The aim of this study was to assess the success of this philosophy in the management of PJI of the hip using our two-stage protocol. The study involved a retrospective review of our prospectively collected database from which we identified all patients who underwent an intended two-stage revision for PJI of the hip. All patients had a diagnosis of PJI according to the major criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) 2013, a minimum five-year follow-up, and were assessed using the MSIS working group outcome-reporting tool. The outcomes were grouped into 'successful' or 'unsuccessful'. A total of 299 two-stage revision THAs in 289 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 258 (86%) proceeded to second-stage surgery. Their mean age was 68.1 years (28 to 92). The median follow-up was 10.7 years (interquartile range (IQR) 6.3 to 15.0). A 91% success rate was seen in those patients who underwent reimplantation, decreasing to 86% when including those who did not proceed to reimplantation. The median duration of postoperative systemic antibiotics following the first stage was five days (IQR 5 to 9). There was no significant difference in outcome between those patients who were treated with antibiotics for ≤ 48 hours (p = 0.961) or ≤ five days (p = 0.376) compared with those who were treated with longer courses. Greater success rates were seen for Gram-positive PJIs (87%) than for Gram-negative (84%) and mixed-Gram PJIs (72%; p = 0.098). Aggressive surgical debridement with a high local concentration of targeted antibiotics at the time of first-stage revision surgery for PJI of the hip, without prolonged systemic antibiotics, provides a high rate of success, responsible antibiotic stewardship, and reduced hospital costs.

The Impact of a Dedicated Multidisciplinary Team Approach for Prosthetic Joint Infections of the Lower Limb

Introduction

Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) of the hip and knee have significant morbidity and mortality, and present with varying local, host and microbiological factors. Given the broad presentation and complexity of PJI’s, we developed a dedicated multidisciplinary team (MDT) to manage this complex patient cohort, and report on our early outcomes.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study of all patients diagnosed with a prosthetic joint infection of the hip or knee (n = 71) at our institution during a 4.5-year period. Patients treated after development of the MDT (post-MDT) (n = 44), were compared to a control group prior establishment of the MDT (pre-MDT) (n = 27).

Results

85.2% of individuals in the pre-MDT, and 85.7% of individuals in the post-MDT group were considered cured at a minimum 2 years post-operatively according to the Delphi-based definition. The total number of admissions to hospital (2.44 vs. 1.84) and total number of antibiotics used (3.37 vs. 2.75) decreased in the post-MDT group; however, differences were not considered statistically significant.

Discussion

Implementation of a dedicated MDT in the management of individuals with PJI’s of the lower limb at our hospital has allowed early and effective collaboration between healthcare personnel, with early promising results. Given the broad nature of PJI, future studies are ongoing to determine modifiable risk factors to reduce the incidence and improve outcomes of individuals with PJI’s where systems can then be implemented into already established MDTs to achieve the best clinical outcome for our patients.

Profiling the Immune Response to Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Non-Infectious Arthroplasty Failure

Arthroplasty failure is a major complication of joint replacement surgery. It can be caused by periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or non-infectious etiologies, and often requires surgical intervention and (in select scenarios) resection and reimplantation of implanted devices. Fast and accurate diagnosis of PJI and non-infectious arthroplasty failure (NIAF) is critical to direct medical and surgical treatment; differentiation of PJI from NIAF may, however, be unclear in some cases. Traditional culture, nucleic acid amplification tests, metagenomic, and metatranscriptomic techniques for microbial detection have had success in differentiating the two entities, although microbiologically negative apparent PJI remains a challenge. Single host biomarkers or, alternatively, more advanced immune response profiling-based approaches may be applied to differentiate PJI from NIAF, overcoming limitations of microbial-based detection methods and possibly, especially with newer approaches, augmenting them. In this review, current approaches to arthroplasty failure diagnosis are briefly overviewed, followed by a review of host-based approaches for differentiation of PJI from NIAF, including exciting futuristic combinational multi-omics methodologies that may both detect pathogens and assess biological responses, illuminating causes of arthroplasty failure.

Epidemiology of Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Fungal prosthetic joint infection (fPJI) is a rare complication; nonetheless, it represents a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. There are no official guidelines on the most effective approach to identify and treat fPJIs. This systematic review aims to review the current literature on fPJI management and provide a comprehensive overview of this topic, especially from an epidemiologic point of view. Studies eligible for this systematic review were identified through an electronic systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until 30 September 2022. Further references were obtained by cross-referencing. Sixty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 372 cases of fPJI; such cases were described mostly in case reports and small case series with only a few larger cohort studies. Diagnosis of fPJI is challenging because of its chronic and indolent clinical course; it is further complicated by the technical difficulty of harvesting fungal cultures. A two-stage revision was the primary procedure in 239 (64.2%) patients whereas DAIR and one-stage approaches were reported in 30 (8.0%) and 18 (4.8 %) cases. In conclusion, our study highlights the heterogeneity of the reported treatments of fPJI, particularly in terms of medical management. With concern to a surgical approach, a two-stage revision arthroplasty is generally suggested, considering fPJI a delayed or late infection. The need for multicenter, prospective studies to provide standardized protocols and improve the treatment of fungal PJI clearly emerges.

Pathogen distrbution and drug resistance in acute, delayed and chronic periprosthetic joint infection: a retrospective analysis of 202 patients.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2111407/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Introduction To assist orthopedic surgeons to select appropriate antibiotics, this study identified the common microorganisms that caused PJI and their drug-resistant spectrum. Methods. The clinical data of 202 patients with PJI after primary knee and hip arthroplasty from January 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the time of postoperative infection, the patients were divided into acute PJI group (25 cases), delayed PJI group (91 cases), and chronic PJI group (86 cases). The results of pathogen species, composition ratio, drug susceptibility tests were collected. Results.The main pathogens of PJI were Gram-positive bacteria (58.91%, 119/202), and the positive rates of culture in patients with acute PJI, delayed PJI and chronic PJI were 32.00% (8/25), 62.64% (57/91) and 62.79% (54/86), followed by gram-negative bacteria (29/202, 14.36%) and fungus (4/202, 1.98%). Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus played an important role as well, followed by gram-negative bacteria (29/202, 14.36%) and fungus (4/202, 1.98%). Penicillin (81.25%), oxacillin (63.33%), erythromycin (61.17%) and clindamycin (48.35%) showed high antibiotic resistance rate in gram-positive bacteria. The drug-sensitivity to linezolid, vancomycin, daptomycin and tigecycline was 100%. The drug resistance rate to carbapenems was low, ranging from 0 to 3.57%. Conclusions. The main pathogens of PJI are Gram-positive bacteria, and the drug resistance rate of chronic PJI is higher than that of delayed and acute PJI.

Mixed Fungal Biofilms: From Mycobiota to Devices, a New Challenge on Clinical Practice

Most current protocols for the diagnosis of fungal infections are based on culture-dependent methods that allow the evaluation of fungal morphology and the identification of the etiologic agent of mycosis. Most current protocols for the diagnosis of fungal infections are based on culture-dependent methods that enable the examination of the fungi for further identification of the etiological agent of the mycosis. The isolation of fungi from pure cultures is typically recommended, as when more than one species is identified, the second agent is considered a contaminant. Fungi mostly survive in highly organized communities that provoke changes in phenotypic profile, increase resistance to antifungals and environmental stresses, and facilitate evasion from the immune system. Mixed fungal biofilms (MFB) harbor more than one fungal species, wherein exchange can occur that potentialize the effects of these virulence factors. However, little is known about MFB and their role in infectious processes, particularly in terms of how each species may synergistically contribute to the pathogenesis. Here, we review fungi present in MFB that are commensals of the human body, forming the mycobiota, and how their participation in MFB affects the maintenance of homeostasis. In addition, we discuss how MFB are formed on both biotic and abiotic surfaces, thus being a significant reservoir of microorganisms that have already been associated in infectious processes of high morbidity and mortality.

Molecular Approach for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

The incidence of total joint arthroplasty is increasing over time since the last decade and expected to be more than 4 million by 2030. As a consequence, the detection of infections associated with surgical interventions is increasing and prosthetic joint infections are representing both a clinically and economically challenging problem. Many pathogens, from bacteria to fungi, elicit the immune system response and produce a polymeric matrix, the biofilm, that serves as their protection. In the last years, the implementation of diagnostic methodologies reduced the error rate and the turn-around time: polymerase chain reaction, targeted or broad-spectrum, and next-generation sequencing have been introduced and they represent a robust approach nowadays that frees laboratories from the unique approach based on culture-based techniques.

Periprosthetic Joint Infections Caused by Candida Species—A Single-Center Experience and Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the treatment results of fungal periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) caused by Candida species from a single orthopedic center and to compare them with reports from other institutions. Methods: Eight patients operated on from January 2014 to December 2021 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in terms of clinical outcomes. A systematic review of the literature identified 153 patients with Candida PJIs extracted from 12 studies according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Results: The success rate of the treatment in the case series was 50%. The most frequent pathogens were Candida albicans (three cases; 37.5%) and Candida parapsilosis (three cases; 37.5%). In one patient (12.5%), bacterial co-infection was noted, and in five patients (62.5%) significant risk factors of PJI were confirmed. The overall success rate on the basis of data collected for systematic review was 65.5%. A sub-analysis of 127 patients revealed statistically significant differences (p = 0.02) with a higher success rate for the knees (77.6%) than for the hips (58%). In 10 studies the analysis of risk factors was performed and among 106 patients in 77 (72.6%) comorbidities predispose to fungal PJI were confirmed. Bacterial co-infection was noted in 84 patients (54.9%). In 93 patients (60.7%) Candida albicans was the culprit pathogen, and in 39 patients (25.5%) Candida parapsilosis was the culprit pathogen. Based on these two most frequent Candida species causing PJI, the success rate of the treatment was statistically different (p = 0.03), and was 60.3% and 83.3%, respectively. The two-stage strategy was more favorable for patients with Candida parapsilosis infections (94.4% success rate) than the one-stage protocol (50% success rate; p = 0.02); as well as in comparison to the two-stage treatment of Candida albicans (65% success rate; p = 0.04). Conclusions: The analysis of the literature showed no differences in the overall success rate between one- and two-stage surgical strategies for all Candida species, but differed significantly comparing the two most frequent strains and concerning PJI localization. The frequent presence of bacterial co-infections makes it necessary to consider the additional administration of antibiotics in the case of fungal PJI.

Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Chronic Histoplasma Capsulatum Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Case Report

CASE

This report describes a histoplasma capsulatum total knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in an immunosuppressed patient treated with a 2-stage revision. The diagnosis of PJI was made based on minor criteria, and the causative organism was identified from cultures obtained at the time of explantation. The patient underwent induction with amphotericin B, followed by oral antifungal therapy and a successful 2-stage revision with a hinged prosthesis with an interval of ∼7 months between stage 1 and stage 2. At the most recent follow-up (18 months), she remained clear from infection with planned lifetime antifungal suppression.

CONCLUSION

This case report highlights the importance of consideration of atypical organisms when treating immunocompromised patients. Furthermore, this case report documents one of the few cases of histoplasma PJI and provides a successful treatment algorithm to potentially be applied to future cases.

Prosthetic Knee Infection With Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus: A Harbinger of Poor Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are biofilm-producing pathogens whose role in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is increasing. There is little data on the prognosis and treatment considerations in the setting of PJI. We sought to evaluate the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and complications in these patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients at a single tertiary medical center from 2009 to 2020 with culture-proven CoNS PJI after total knee arthroplasty, as diagnosed by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. The primary outcome was treatment success, with failure defined as recurrent CoNS PJI, recurrent PJI with a new pathogen, and/or chronic oral antibiotic suppression at one year postoperatively.

RESULTS

We identified 55 patients with a CoNS total knee arthroplasty PJI with a mean follow-up of 29.8 months (SD: 16.3 months). The most commonly isolated organism was Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 36, 65.5%). The overall prevalence of methicillin resistance was 63%. Surgical treatment included surgical debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention in 25 (45.5%) cases and two-stage revision (22 articulating and eight static antibiotic-impregnated spacers). At one-year follow-up, only 47% of patients had successful management of their infection. The surgical debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention cohort had the higher rate of treatment failure (60.0%) compared to two-stage revision (46.7%).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate a poor rate of success in treating CoNS PJI. This likely represents the interplay of inherent virulence through biofilm formation and decreased antibiotic efficacy.

Is a preoperative pathogen detection a prerequisite before undergoing one-stage exchange for prosthetic joint infection of the hip?

BACKGROUND

A preoperative pathogen detection is considered a prerequisite before undergoing one-stage exchange for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) according to most guidelines. This study compares patients with and without preoperative pathogen detection undergoing one-stage exchange for PJI of the hip. The authors put up the hypothesis that a preoperative pathogen detection is no prerequisite in selected cases undergoing one-stage exchange.

METHODS

30 consecutive patients with PJI of the hip, treated with one-stage exchange, between 2011 and 2021, were retrospectively included. Mean age was 70 years and mean follow-up 2.1 ± 1.8 years. PJI was defined according to the European Bone and Joint Infection Society. One-stage exchange was performed in (1) chronic PJI longer than 4 weeks, (2) well-retained bone condition, (3) absence of multiple prior revisions for PJI (≤ 2) with absence of difficult-to-treat pathogens in the past, and (4) necessity/preference for early mobility due to comorbidities/age.

RESULTS

One-stage exchange was performed in 20 patients with and in 10 without a preoperative pathogen detection. Age (71 years, 68 years, p = 0.519), sex (50% and 30% males, p = 0.440), American Society of Anesthesiologists Score (2.2, 2.4, p = 0.502), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (3, 4, p = 0.530) did not differ among the two groups. No significant differences were noted concerning preoperative CRP (15 mg/l, 43 mg/l, p = 0.228), synovial cell count (15.990/nl, 5.308/nl, p = 0.887), radiological signs of loosening (55%, 50%, p = 0.999), and intraoperative histopathology. Except a higher rate of coagulase-negative staphylococci (70%, 20%, p = 0.019) in patients with a preoperative pathogen detection, no significant differences in pathogen spectrum were identified among groups. Revision for PJI recurrence was performed in one patient with an initial preoperative pathogen detection (3.3%). Additional revisions were performed for dislocation in two and postoperative hematoma in one patient. Revision rate for both septic and aseptic causes (p = 0.999), stay in hospital (16 and 15 days, p = 0.373) and modified Harris Hip Score (60, 71, p = 0.350) did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with and without a preoperative pathogen detection did not show significant differences concerning baseline characteristics, clinical and functional outcomes at 2 years. An absent preoperative pathogen detection is no absolute contraindication for one-stage exchange in chronic PJI, if involving good bone quality and absence of multiple prior revisions.

Risk factors for mortality following one-stage septic hip arthroplasty - a case-control study

PURPOSE

Despite good clinical outcomes and a high success rate, there is a comparatively high mortality after one stage septic exchange of total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for mortality in the hospitalization period after one-stage septic exchange of THA.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed in our database all patients who had a one-stage septic exchange for periprosthetic infection of THA and died during hospitalization (n = 33). The control group was matched semi-randomly by surgical procedure (n = 121) who did not die during hospitalization. The two groups were analyzed for risk factors such as age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and high-/low-virulence bacteria.

RESULTS

In the deceased group, 16 patients were female and 17 were male with a mean age at surgery of 73.2 years. In the control group, there were 55 females and 66 males with an average age at surgery of 68.2 years. Comparing the two groups, the deceased group had a significantly higher proportion of liver disease as well as higher rate of pulmonary embolism, apoplexy, and/or myocardial infarction, an increased CCI with an average of 6.5 and advanced age. Further demographic and surgery-related parameters especially high- or low-virulent germs were not identified as risk factors for mortality during the hospitalization period. The binominal logistic regression analysis showed that the probability of an inpatient death following one-stage septic exchange of THA increases by a factor of 3.079, with each additional point of the CCI.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, advanced age and high CCI are the main risk factors for mortality after single-stage septic change of THA. However, high-virulence bacteria have no influence on the mortality during the hospitalization period after one-stage septic exchange of THA.