Does the Organism Profile of Periprosthetic Joint Infections Change With a Topical Vancomycin Powder and Dilute Povidone-Iodine Lavage Protocol?

The effects of chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, and vancomycin on growth and biofilms of pathogens that cause prosthetic joint infections: an in vitro model

BACKGROUND

Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and povidone-iodine (PI) are commonly used to prevent prosthetic joint infection (PJI) during total joint replacement; however, their effective concentrations and impact on biofilms are not well defined.

AIM

To determine: (1) the in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration of CHG and PI against model PJI-causing organisms and clinical isolates; (2) their impact on biofilm formation; (3) if there is a synergistic benefit to combining the two solutions; and (4) if adding the antibiotic vancomycin impacts antiseptic activity.

METHODS

We measured in vitro growth and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis, methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans, as well as recent clinical isolates, in the presence of increasing concentrations of CHG and/or PI. Checkerboard assays were used to measure potential synergy of the solutions together and with vancomycin.

FINDINGS

CHG and PI inhibited growth and biofilm formation of all model organisms tested at concentrations of 0.0004% and 0.33% or lower, respectively; highly dilute concentrations paradoxically increased biofilm formation. The solutions did not synergize with one another and acted independently of vancomycin.

CONCLUSION

CHG and PI are effective at lower concentrations than typically used, establishing baselines to support further clinical trials aimed at optimizing wound disinfection. There is no synergistic advantage to using both in combination. Vancomycin is effective at inhibiting the growth of S. epidermidis and S. aureus; however, it stimulates P. aeruginosa biofilm production, suggesting in the rare case of P. aeruginosa PJI, it could exacerbate infection.

Vancomycin powder in the prevention of infection in primary knee and hip arthroplasty: Case-control study with 1151 arthroplasties

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Vancomycin powder (VP) has been positively used in spinal surgery to reduce the rate of infections. Hardly any data have been published on hip and knee joint replacement surgery, and its usefulness is questioned. Our objective was to investigate the effectiveness of VP in reducing prosthetic infection and its possible complications.

METHODS

Primary hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasties were reviewed, performed by five surgeons in one hospital center, between 2017 and 2018. 1g of VP was used on the implant prior to surgical closure based on the surgeon's preferences. With a 5-year follow-up in which the infection rate and local complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

One thousand one hundred and fifty one arthroplasties were performed, 748 were TKA and 403 were THA. Nine patients were diagnosed with prosthetic infection, of which five received VP and four did not (P=.555). Likewise, another 15 patients suffered wound complications, of which 11 received VP and 4 did not (P=.412). There were no differences, either, in the rest of the complications depending on the use or not of VP (P=.101). Likewise, the number of patients who needed reintervention was similar (P=.999). No systemic complications were detected due to the use of VP.

CONCLUSIONS

It has not been possible to demonstrate that the use of VP reduces the rates of prosthetic infection in the hip and knee, so we cannot recommend its use.

[Translated article] Vancomycin powder in the prevention of infection in primary knee and hip arthroplasty: Case-control study with 1151 arthroplasties

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Vancomycin powder (VP) has been positively used in spinal surgery to reduce the rate of infections. Hardly any data have been published on hip and knee joint replacement surgery, and its usefulness is questioned. Our objective was to investigate the effectiveness of VP in reducing prosthetic infection and its possible complications.

METHODS

Primary hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasties were reviewed, performed by five surgeons in one hospital centre, between 2017 and 2018. One gram of VP was used on the implant prior to surgical closure based on the surgeon's preferences. With a 5-year follow-up in which the infection rate and local complications were analysed.

RESULTS

One thousand one hundred and fifty-one arthroplasties were performed, 748 were TKA and 403 were THA. Nine patients were diagnosed with prosthetic infection, of which five received VP and four did not (p=0.555). Likewise, another 15 patients suffered wound complications, of which 11 received VP and 4 did not (p=0.412). There were no differences, either, in the rest of the complications depending on the use or not of VP (p=0.101). Likewise, the number of patients who needed reintervention was similar (p=0.999). No systemic complications were detected due to the use of VP.

CONCLUSIONS

It has not been possible to demonstrate that the use of VP reduces the rates of prosthetic infection in the hip and knee, so we cannot recommend its use.

Topical Application of Vancomycin Powder to Prevent Infections after Massive Bone Resection and the implantation of Megaprostheses in Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery

Introduction

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a serious burden in orthopaedic oncology. Through the years, several local expedients have been proposed to minimise the risk of periprosthetic infection. In this study, we report our outcomes using topical vancomycin powder (VP) with the aim to prevent PJIs.

Materials and methods

Fifty oncological cases treated with massive bone resection and the implant of a megaprosthesis were included in our study. Among them, 22 [(GGroup A) received one gram of vancomycin powder on the surface of the implant and another gram on the surface of the muscular fascia]. The remaining 28 did not receive such a treatment (Group B). The rest of surgical procedures and the follow-up were the same for the two groups. Patients underwent periodical outpatient visits, radiographs and blood exams' evaluations. Diagnosis of PJIs and adverse reactions to topical vancomycin were recorded.

Results

None of the cases treated with topical vancomycin developed infections, whereas 6 of the 28 cases (21.4%) who did not receive the powder suffered from PJIs. These outcomes suggest that cases treated with VP had a significantly lower risk of post-operative PJI (p=0.028). None of our cases developed acute kidney failures or any other complication directly or indirectly attributable to the local administration of VP.

Conclusions

The topical use of vancomycin powder on megaprosthetic surfaces and the overlying fascias, alongside with a correct endovenous antibiotic prophylaxis, can represent a promising approach in order to minimise the risk of periprosthetic infections in orthopaedic oncology surgery.

Intraarticular vancomycin decreased the risk of acute postoperative periprosthetic joint infection without increasing complication in primary total joint arthroplasty-a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the preventive effect of intraarticularly administered vancomycin on acute postoperative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent unilateral primary TJA were prospectively enrolled. The patients were divided into vancomycin group and control group according to whether 1 g of vancomycin powder suspended in 30 ml normal saline was intraarticularly administered after arthrotomy closure. Acute postoperative PJI and aseptic wound complication were evaluated within 3 months postoperatively. Vancomycin-associated toxicity including acute renal failure, ototoxicity and anaphylaxis was also evaluated.

RESULTS

In terms of demographic parameters and comorbidities, no significant difference was found between the two groups. Intra-articular vancomycin significantly lowered the risk of acute postoperative PJI after primary TJA (P = 0.015) and primary total knee arthroplasty (P = 0.031). However, for patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty, the PJI rate was comparable between the two groups. Overall, the risk of aseptic wound complication between the two groups was also similar. Vancomycin-associated acute renal injury, ototoxicity, or anaphylaxis was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular injection of 1 g of vancomycin suspension after arthrotomy closure during TJA lowered the risk of acute postoperative PJI without increasing the risk of aseptic wound complication and vancomycin-associated systemic toxicity.

Preclosure povidone-iodine lavage in total hip replacement surgery: Infection outcomes and cost-benefit analysis

OBJECTIVE

To report the outcomes and cost-benefit analysis of preclosure povidone-iodine lavage (PrePIL) used to reduce the risk of infection following total hip replacement (THR) surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

ANIMALS

One thousand six hundred ninety-nine dogs, 17 cats.

METHODS

The medical records of 2213 consecutive THR cases were reviewed to determine the incidence of infection. The last 102 were treated with PrePIL using a commercially sourced 0.035% povidone-iodine solution. Postoperative infection rates were compared. A cost-benefit analysis was used to calculate if a PrePIL protocol is economically feasible.

RESULTS

Twenty-one THRs out of 2111 (0.99%) that did not have PrePIL developed infection. Infection occurred in none of the 102 PrePIL cases. Cost analysis revealed a PrePIL break-even cost at $49.74 and a break-even infection rate of 0.949%. No complications were identified related to the use of PrePIL.

CONCLUSION

Preclosure povidone-iodine lavage appeared to be efficacious in lowering THR infection rates, and it appeared to be safe for this use based on our 102 consecutive cases. The cost of the PrePIL was minimal compared to the overall cost to resolve THR infection and the potential effect on hip function prognosis. The math formulas developed can be used by surgeons to calculate cost effectiveness and break-even cost based on their THR infection rate, and to compare to the cost of a THR revision and infection resolution.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

At current costs, PrePIL can be used in 2415 THR cases at a similar cost of a single revision surgery and resolution of a periprosthetic infection.

Effects of different doses of vancomycin powder in total knee and hip arthroplasty on the periprosthetic joint infection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a serious complication for patients. Some joint surgeons have tried to use vancomycin powder (VP) in total knee and total hip arthroplasty to prevent postoperative PJI, but its effect is still not clear. At present, there is no meta-analysis that specifically analyses the effect of different doses of vancomycin powder on the incidence of PJI.

METHODS

We carried out a search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and identified the studies we needed. Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 software was employed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis of primary TKA (PTKA) showed that using 1 g (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.22-0.67 [P = 0.0008]) and 2 g (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.74 [P = 0.0008]) of vancomycin powder in primary TKA (PTKA) could all significantly prevent PJI. The analysis of primary THA (PTHA) showed that using 1 g (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.80 [P = 0.01]) of vancomycin powder effectively decreased the incidence of PJI, while using 2 g (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.53-1.97 [P = 0.94]) of vancomycin powder had no significant effect on preventing PJI. Because the data were abnormal, we believed the conclusion that using 2 g of vancomycin powder in primary THA had no effect on preventing PJI was doubtful. Using vancomycin powder in revision TKA (RTKA) significantly reduced the PJI rate (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.77 [P = 0.01]), similar to revision THA (RTHA) (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14-0.96 [P = 0.04]).

CONCLUSIONS

In primary TKA, both 1 g and 2 g of vancomycin powder can effectively prevent PJI. In primary THA, using 1 g of vancomycin powder is a better choice, while the effect of using 2 g of vancomycin powder is not clear, and a more prospective randomized controlled trial should be done to verify it. In revision TKA and revision THA, vancomycin powder is a good choice to prevent PJI.

Intra-articular vancomycin for the prophylaxis of periprosthetic joint infection caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus after total knee arthroplasty in a rat model: the dosage, efficacy, and safety

Although intra-articular vancomycin powder (VP) is sometimes applied before the closure of the incision to prevent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after joint replacement, the dosage, efficacy and safety remain controversial. This study aimed to explore the dosage, efficacy, and safety of intra-articular VP in the prophylaxis of infection after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a rat model. Sixty male rats were randomly divided into five groups after receiving TKA surgery: Control (no antibiotics); systemic vancomycin (SV) (intraperitoneal injection, 88 mg/kg, equal to 1g in a patient weighted 70kg); VP0.5, VP1.0 and VP2.0 (44 mg/kg, 88 mg/kg and 176 mg/kg respectively, intra-articular). All animals were inoculated in the knee with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). General status, serum biomarkers, radiology, microbiological assay and histopathological tests were assessed within 14 days post-operatively. Compared with the Control and SV groups, bacterial counts, knee-width, tissue inflammation, and osteolysis were reduced in the VP0.5, VP1.0 and VP2.0 groups, without notable bodyweight loss and incision complications. Among all the VP groups, VP1.0 and VP2.0 groups presented superior outcomes in the knee-width and tissue inflammation than the VP0.5 group. Microbial culture indicated that no MRSA survived in the knee of VP1.0 and VP2.0 groups, while bacteria growth was observed in VP0.5 group. No obvious changes in the structure and functional biomarkers of liver and kidney were observed in both SV and VP groups. Therefore, intra-articular vancomycin powder at the dosage from 88 mg/kg to 176 mg/kg may be effective and safe in preventing PJI induced by methicillin-resistant S. aureus in the rat TKA model.

Surgical Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty Affects the Organism Profile of Early Periprosthetic Joint Infections

The optimal approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains hotly debated. While wound complications following the direct anterior approach are higher than with other approaches, the organism profile of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) by approach remains unknown. Our goal was to compare the organism profiles of PJIs following direct anterior and non-anterior THA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 12,549 primary THAs (4,515 direct anterior and 8,034 non-anterior) that had been performed between January 2012 and September 2019 at a university-affiliated single-specialty orthopaedic hospital to identify patients with an early postoperative PJI. Criteria used for the diagnosis of a PJI were the National Healthcare Safety Network, which screens for PJI that occurs within 90 days of index arthroplasty, and the Musculoskeletal Infection Society guidelines. Patient demographic information and organism characteristics were recorded for analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 84 patients (38 who underwent the direct anterior approach and 46 who underwent the non-anterior approach) with an early postoperative PJI following primary THA (0.67% total THA PJI rate, 0.84% direct anterior THA PJI rate, and 0.57% non-anterior THA PJI rate). The direct anterior THA cohort had a significantly lower body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists score than the non-anterior THA cohort (29.5 versus 35.2 kg/m2, p < 0.0001; 2.29 versus 2.63, p = 0.016, respectively). Regarding organism profile, patients in the direct anterior THA cohort had significantly more monomicrobial gram-negative infections than the non-anterior THA cohort (4 versus 0, p = 0.038). We did not identify any demographic risk factors other than approach for gram-negative PJI. There were no significant differences in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, obligate anaerobes, polymicrobial, or PJIs due to other organisms by approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct anterior THA approaches have a greater risk of monomicrobial gram-negative PJI, likely due to the unique microbiome of the inguinal region. While targeted infection prophylaxis may reduce these infections, it is not entirely effective on its own. Future studies with larger sample sizes are required to help us develop more targeted perioperative infection prophylaxis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.