Custom Triflange Cups: 20-Year Experience

Application of Intraoperative Individualized Cup Combination-Cup-on-Cup Technique in Severe Acetabular Defects

This study aimed to investigate the application of the cup-on-cup technique in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and report clinical and radiographic outcomes from a series of case follow-ups. Retrospective analysis of 10 patients who underwent acetabular prosthesis revision with cup-on-cup technique. According to the Paprosky classification of acetabular bone defects, there were 2 cases of type II C, 3 cases of type III A, and 5 cases of type III B. The average follow-up was 54.8 ± 5.1 months, and the Harris score of the hip joint increased from 37.0 ± 9.9 preoperatively to 80.5 ± 3.1 postoperatively at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). Comparing the surgical side's hip center of rotation (COR) to the contralateral side, the preoperative average upward displacement was 33.8 ± 15.0 mm, while the postoperative average upward displacement was 0.2 ± 3.3 mm (p < 0.001). Similarly, the preoperative average inward displacement was 9.1 ± 5.1 mm, while the postoperative average outward displacement was 1.8 ± 1.6 mm (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference (p = 0.71) between the average density values of the contralateral and surgical sides at the final follow-up, which were 127.4 ± 13.7 and 125.0 ± 14.8, respectively. During the follow-up period, all patients achieved satisfactory radiographic outcomes, and no prosthetic loosening was observed. The cup-on-cup technique can reconstruct acetabular bone defects and restore hip COR in revision THA, with favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Evaluation and Management of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 10-year Update

Acetabular bone loss continues to be one of the most complex and challenging scenarios facing the orthopaedic surgeon. Preoperative planning and classification systems essentially have remained the same, with the Paprosky classification still being the most commonly used. Careful radiological assessment with well-defined criteria can accurately diagnose acetabular bone loss patterns with an associated chronic pelvic discontinuity before surgery. The use of cemented reconstruction techniques has declined, and contemporary practice trends have involved the increasing use of highly porous hemispherical shells in conjunction with modular porous metal augments, which can successfully treat most acetabular revisions. Noncemented treatment options for the management of acetabular bone loss during revision include conventional porous/modular highly porous hemispherical implants, nonmodular highly porous implants with cementable acetabular liners, cup-cage reconstruction, oblong cups, and triflange reconstruction. These options can be combined with modular porous metal augments, structural allografts, impaction grafting, or reconstruction cages. Acetabular distraction is a newer technique for chronic pelvic discontinuity, which is used in conjunction with off-the-shelf revision acetabular shells and modular porous metal augments. This review is an update over the past decade, highlighting studies with mid to long-term follow-up, and presents the advantages, disadvantages, and principles associated with each of the most commonly used reconstructive techniques.

Off-the-Shelf Tibial Cone Sizes May Not Accommodate All Patients' Bone Morphology and May Lead to Cortical Breaches in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A 3D Modeling Study

Background

In revision total knee arthroplasty, tibial cones have demonstrated improved longevity and reduced incidence of aseptic loosening. Several currently available "off-the-shelf" (OTS) cone systems may not have sizes to accommodate all patient bone morphologies.

Methods

Computed tomographies from one hundred primary total knee arthroplasty patients and dimensions of 4 OTS cones were obtained. Press-fit stems were positioned in 3D tibia models to fit the diaphyseal trajectory. Cones were positioned around the stem at 1, 6, and 13 mm resections measured from the trough of the medial tibial plateau, simulating proximal tibial cuts and bone loss. Tibias were examined for cortical breaching following modeled cone preparation.

Results

Increased rate of breaching was observed as size and depth of the cone increased. In 2/49 (4.1%) male and 19/46 (41.3%) female tibias, cones could not be positioned without breaching. No breaches were found in 22/49 (45.0%) male and 5/46 (10.9%) female tibias. For every 1 centimeter increase in patient height, odds of breaching decreased by 12% (odds ratio: 0.88, confidence interval: 0.84, 0.92). For every size increase in cone width, odds of breaching increased by 34% (odds ratio: 1.34, confidence interval: 1.28, 1.47). Placing cones deeper also increased breaching compared to the 1 mm cut.

Conclusions

In revision total knee arthroplasty, smaller OTS or custom tibial cones may be needed to fit a patient's proximal tibial geometry. This is especially true in patients not accommodated by the OTS cone sizes we tested, which impacted shorter patients and/or those with substantial bone loss requiring more tibial resection and deeper cone placement. Use of smaller or custom tibial cones should be considered where indicated.

Bridging Massive Acetabular Defects With the Triflange Cup: 10- to 28-Year Results

BACKGROUND

Massive acetabular bone loss, encountered complex primary or revision total hip arthroplasty, remains a reconstructive challenge. The custom triflange cup reliably achieves both early fixation and longer-term stability. This study presents the 10-year minimum three-surgeon follow-up of acetabular defects managed with a custom triflange component.

METHODS

All patients who underwent a custom triflange acetabular component implantation from January 1992 to December 2009 were identified. Demographics, implant data, outcomes, and reoperations were collected and analyzed. Bone defects in all cases were Paprosky type IIIA, IIIB, or IV. A total of 233 patients (241 hips) underwent implantation of a custom triflange during the study period. There were 81 patients (83 hips) who died prior to minimum follow-up and 84 patients (88 hips) had minimum follow-up of 10 years (mean 15.2; range, 10 to 28), or failure prior to 10 years.

RESULTS

Complications requiring additional surgery occurred in 43 hips (49%). There were 10 revisions for failure (11.4%); four were due to recurrent infection, three for aseptic loosening, and one for recurrent infection with all revised to a new triflange. There was one patient who was resected to a Girdlestone for infection and one patient was revised for infection to a bipolar hemiprosthesis due to a healed discontinuity.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this study represents the largest cohort and longest follow-up in the current literature and demonstrates excellent survivorship and clinical results at an average of 15 years follow-up. The component was retained in 89% of cases.

Mid- to Long-term Follow-up of Severe Acetabular Bone Defect after Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Impaction Bone Grafting and Metal Mesh

OBJECTIVE

In revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defect continues to be problematic for orthopedic surgeons. This study reports the mid- to long-term survivorship, radiological outcomes, and complications of impaction bone grafting (IBG) and metal mesh with a cemented acetabular component in the reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects in revision THA.

METHODS

This retrospective consecutive study included 26 patients (29 hips: type II B, four; type II C, three; type III A, 10; and type III B, 12) who underwent revision THA, which was performed using IBG and metal mesh, between 2007 and 2014 in our institution. All patients were followed up regularly for clinical and radiographical assessments. Migration and loosening of prosthesis graft integration and complications were observed and analyzed. Survival analysis was performed using a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

At the time of revision, 75.9% of the hips (22 hips) were classified as type III bone defects. The average follow-up period was 9.4 ± 2.8 (range, 2.4-14.0) years. Of the 29 hips, four hips (13.8%) were assessed as clinical failures; at the last follow-up, two had undergone re-revision THA, and two had not been scheduled for re-revision THA despite radiological failure of the acetabular component. Among them, three clinical failures (10.3%) were due to aseptic loosening, and one (3.4%) was due to infection. Radiographic evaluation showed bone graft integration in all hips during the follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis revealed an acetabular reconstruction survival rate of 86.5% (95% confidence interval, 61.4%-95.7%) at 10 years.

CONCLUSION

IBG and metal mesh with a cemented acetabular component for revision THA is an effective technique for treating severe acetabular bone defects, with effective mid- to long-term outcomes due to the solid reconstruction of the acetabular bone defect and restoration of the hip rotation center.