1
|
De A, Chalmers BP, Springer BD, Browne JA, Lewallen DG, Stambough JB. What Is the Incidence of and Outcomes After Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention (DAIR) for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in the AJRR Population? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2024:00003086-990000000-01683. [PMID: 39246104 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000003138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is used to manage acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Given the uncertain success of single or multiple DAIR attempts and possible long-term deleterious effects this treatment can create when trying to treat persistent infection, it is important to understand the frequency with which surgeons in the United States are attempting multiple debridements for PJI and whether those procedures are achieving the desired goal. QUESTION/PURPOSES In the context of the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR), we asked: (1) What proportion of patients who undergo DAIR have only one DAIR, and what percentage of those patients have more than one? (2) Of the patients who undergo one or more DAIR procedures, what is the proportion who progress to additional surgical procedures? (3) What is the cumulative incidence of medical or surgical endpoints related to infection on the affected leg (other than additional DAIR procedures)? METHODS DAIR procedures to treat PJI, defined by ICD-9/10 and CPT (Current Procedural Technology) codes, reported to the AJRR from 2012 to 2020 were merged with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data from 2012 to 2020 to determine the incidence of patients aged 65 and older who underwent additional PJI-related procedures on the same joint. Linking to CMS ensures no loss to follow-up or patient migration to a non-AJRR site. As of 2021, the AJRR captures roughly 35% of all arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States. Of the total 2.2 million procedures in the AJRR, only 0.2% of the procedures were eligible based on our inclusion criteria. Additionally, 61% of the total population is Medicare eligible, and thus, these patients are linked to CMS. Of the 5029 DAIR attempts after a TKA, 46% (2318) were performed in female patients. Similarly, there were a total of 798 DAIR attempts after a THA, and 50% (398) were performed in female patients. For the purposes of decreasing confounding factors, bilateral THAs and TKAs were excluded from the study population. When querying for eligible procedures from 2012 to 2020, the patient population was limited to those 65 years and older, and a subsequent reoperation for infection had to be reported after a primary TJA. This limited the patient population as most infections reported to AJRR resulted in a revision, and we were searching for DAIRs. Although 5827 TJAs were identified as a primary TJA with a subsequent infectious event, more than 65% (3788) of that population did not have a reported event. The following conditions were queried as secondary outcomes after the first DAIR: sepsis, cellulitis, postoperative infection, endocarditis, amputation, knee fusion, resection, drainage, arthrotomy, and debridement. To answer our first and second study questions, we used frequency testing from the available AJRR data. Because of competing risks and issues with incomplete data, we used the cumulative incidence function to evaluate the outcomes specific to study question 3. RESULTS Of the patients who underwent DAIR, 93% (5406 of 5827) had one DAIR and 8% (421 of 5827) had more than one. Among the DAIR population, at least 35% of TKAs and 38% of THAs were identified as having experienced an additional PJI-related event (an additional surgical procedure on the same joint, sustained an infectious endpoint in the linked CMS-AJRR dataset, or they had died). The cumulative incidence of developing a further medical or surgical condition related to the joint that had the initial DAIR were as follows: 48% (95% CI 42% to 54%) at 8 years after a DAIR following a TKA and 42% (95% CI 37% to 46%) at 4 years after a DAIR following a THA. The timepoints for TKA and THA are different because there are more longitudinal procedure data available for TKAs regarding DAIR procedures than for THAs. CONCLUSION In this study, we used data from the AJRR to assess the incidences of single and multiple DAIR attempts and additional surgical- and infection-related sequalae. Continued investigation is required to determine the fate of infected joints that undergo DAIR with regard to ultimate patient outcome. Future cross-sectional studies using large datasets are necessary to assess functional outcomes and determine the risk of persistent infection after DAIR more precisely. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayushmita De
- American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL, USA
| | - Brian P Chalmers
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mansour E, Clarke HD, Spangehl MJ, Bingham JS. Periprosthetic Infection in Patients With Multiple Joint Arthroplasties. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024; 32:e106-e114. [PMID: 37831949 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The number of total joint arthroplasties performed in the United States is increasing every year. Owing to the aging population and excellent long-term prosthesis survival, 45% of patients who undergo joint arthroplasty will receive two or more joint arthroplasties during their lifetimes. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is among the most common complications after arthroplasty. Evaluation and treatment of PJI in patients with multiple joint arthroplasties is challenging, and no consensus exists for the optimal management. Multiple PJI can occur simultaneously, synchronous, or separated by extended time, metachronous. Patient risk factors for both scenarios have been reported and may guide evaluation and long-term management. Whether to perform joint aspiration for asymptomatic prosthesis in the presence of suspected PJI in patients with multiple joint arthroplasties is controversial. Furthermore, no consensus exists regarding whether patients who have multiple joint arthroplasties and develop PJI in a single joint should be considered for prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce the risk of future infections. Finally, the optimal treatment of synchronous joint infections whether by débridement, antibiotics and implant retention, and one-stage or two-stage revision has not been defined. This review will summarize the best information available and provide pragmatic management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elie Mansour
- From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee JJ, Oladeji K, Sweeney BF, Chakoma TL, Arora P, Finlay AK, Amanatullah DF. Single, Recurrent, Synchronous, and Metachronous Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Patients With Multiple Hip and Knee Arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38:1846-1853. [PMID: 36924855 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rate for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) exceeds 1% for primary arthroplasties. Over 30% of patients who have a primary arthroplasty require an additional arthroplasty, and the impact of PJI on this population is understudied. Our objective was to assess the prevalence of recurrent, synchronous, and metachronous PJI in patients who had multiple arthroplasties and to identify risk factors for a subsequent PJI. METHODS We identified 337 patients who had multiple arthroplasties and at least 1 PJI that presented between 2003 and 2021. The mean follow-up after revision arthroplasty was 3 years (range, 0 to 17.2). Patients who had multiple infected prostheses were categorized as synchronous (ie, presenting at the same time as the initial infection) or metachronous (ie, presenting at a different time as the initial infection). The PJI diagnosis was made using the MusculoSkeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. RESULTS There were 39 (12%) patients who experienced recurrent PJI in the same joint, while 31 (9%) patients developed PJI in another joint. Positive blood cultures were more likely in the second joint PJI (48%) compared to recurrent PJI (23%) or a single PJI (15%, P < .001). Synchronous PJI represented 42% of the second joint PJI cases (n = 13), while metachronous PJI represented 58% (n = 18). Tobacco users had 75% higher odds of metachronous PJI (odds ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.9, P = .041). CONCLUSION Over 20% of the patients with multiple arthroplasties and a single PJI will develop a subsequent PJI in another arthroplasty with 12% recurring in the initial arthroplasty and nearly 10% ocurring in another arthroplasty. Particular caution should be taken in patients who use tobacco, have bacteremia, or have Staphylococcus aureus isolation at time of their initial PJI. Optimizing the management of this high-risk patient population is necessary to reduce the additional burden of subsequent PJI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan J Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Kingsley Oladeji
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California
| | - Brian F Sweeney
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | - Prerna Arora
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California
| | - Andrea K Finlay
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California
| | - Derek F Amanatullah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jeong S, Yang A, Rubin LE, Arsoy D. Management of Bilateral Synchronous Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection in a Patient with Infected Heart Transplant: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect 2023; 13:01709767-202309000-00019. [PMID: 37506219 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.cc.23.00182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
CASE A 74-year-old man presented with septic shock with infection of his heart transplant and bilateral prosthetic knee joints simultaneously. He underwent bilateral knee resection arthroplasties with placement of articulating spacers. At 3-year follow-up, the patient was alive and ambulating independently. CONCLUSION This case represents the first report of bilateral hematogenous prosthetic knee infections associated with concomitant enterococcal endocarditis of a heart transplant treated successfully and definitively with radical debridement and placement of articulating spacer with regular implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seongho Jeong
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Ally Yang
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lee E Rubin
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Diren Arsoy
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sangaletti R, Zanna L, Akkaya M, Sandiford N, Ekhtiari S, Gehrke T, Citak M. Periprosthetic joint infection in patients with multiple arthroplasties. Bone Joint J 2023; 105-B:294-300. [PMID: 36854322 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.105b3.bjj-2022-0800.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
Despite numerous studies focusing on periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), there are no robust data on the risk factors and timing of metachronous infections. Metachronous PJIs are PJIs that can arise in the same or other artificial joints after a period of time, in patients who have previously had PJI. Between January 2010 and December 2018, 661 patients with multiple joint prostheses in situ were treated for PJI at our institution. Of these, 73 patients (11%) developed a metachronous PJI (periprosthetic infection in patients who have previously had PJI in another joint, after a lag period) after a mean time interval of 49.5 months (SD 30.24; 7 to 82.9). To identify patient-related risk factors for a metachronous PJI, the following parameters were analyzed: sex; age; BMI; and pre-existing comorbidity. Metachronous infections were divided into three groups: Group 1, metachronous infections in ipsilateral joints; Group 2, metachronous infections of the contralateral lower limb; and Group 3, metachronous infections of the lower and upper limb. We identified a total of 73 metachronous PJIs: 32 PJIs in Group 1, 38 in Group 2, and one in Group 3. The rate of metachronous infection was 11% (73 out 661 cases) at a mean of four years following first infection. Diabetes mellitus incidence was found significantly more frequently in the metachronous infection group than in non-metachronous infection group. The rate of infection in Group 1 (21.1%) was significantly higher (p = 0.049) compared to Groups 2 (6.2%) and 3 (3%). The time interval of metachronous infection development was shorter in adjacent joint infections. Concordance between the bacterium of the first PJI and that of the metachronous PJI in Group 1 (21/34) was significantly higher than Group 2 (13/38; p = 0.001). The findings of this study suggest that metachronous PJI occurs in more than one in ten patients with an index PJI. Female patients, diabetic patients, and patients with a polymicrobial index PJI are at significantly higher risk for developing a metachronous PJI. Furthermore, metachronous PJIs are significantly more likely to occur in an adjacent joint (e.g. ipsilateral hip and knee) as opposed to a more remote site (i.e. contralateral or upper vs lower limb). Additionally, adjacent joint PJIs occur significantly earlier and are more likely to be caused by the same bacteria as the index PJI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rudy Sangaletti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico - Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, U.O.C Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luigi Zanna
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mustafa Akkaya
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nemandra Sandiford
- Joint Reconstruction Unit, Southland Hospital, Invercargill, New Zealand
| | - Seper Ekhtiari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Gehrke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mustafa Citak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Patel
- From the Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, and the Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sambri A, Caldari E, Fiore M, Giannini C, Filippini M, Morante L, Rondinella C, Zamparini E, Tedeschi S, Viale P, De Paolis M. Synchronous Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12081841. [PMID: 36010192 PMCID: PMC9406556 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12081841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) occurring in multiple joints at the same time (synchronous PJI) are an extremely rare complication, frequently associated with bacteremia, and are associated with high mortality rates. The presence of three or more prosthetic joints, rheumatoid arthritis, neoplasia, bacteremia and immune-modulating therapy seem to be the recurring risk factors for synchronous PJI. In case of PJIs, all other replaced joints should be considered as potentially infected and investigated if PJI is suspected. Treatments of synchronous multiple PJIs vary and must be decided on a case-by-case basis. However, the advantages of one-stage exchange seem to outweigh the two-stage protocol, as it decreases the number of necessary surgical procedures. Nonetheless, too few studies have been conducted to allow firm conclusions about the best handling of synchronous PJI. Thus, additional studies are needed to understand this devastating complication and to design the most appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic path.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Sambri
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.C.); (M.F.); (C.G.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (C.R.); (M.D.P.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Emilia Caldari
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.C.); (M.F.); (C.G.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (C.R.); (M.D.P.)
| | - Michele Fiore
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.C.); (M.F.); (C.G.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (C.R.); (M.D.P.)
| | - Claudio Giannini
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.C.); (M.F.); (C.G.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (C.R.); (M.D.P.)
| | - Matteo Filippini
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.C.); (M.F.); (C.G.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (C.R.); (M.D.P.)
| | - Lorenzo Morante
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.C.); (M.F.); (C.G.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (C.R.); (M.D.P.)
| | - Claudia Rondinella
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.C.); (M.F.); (C.G.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (C.R.); (M.D.P.)
| | - Eleonora Zamparini
- Infectious Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.Z.); (S.T.); (P.V.)
| | - Sara Tedeschi
- Infectious Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.Z.); (S.T.); (P.V.)
- Department Medical and Surgical Sciences, DIMEC Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Viale
- Infectious Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.Z.); (S.T.); (P.V.)
- Department Medical and Surgical Sciences, DIMEC Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Massimiliano De Paolis
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.C.); (M.F.); (C.G.); (M.F.); (L.M.); (C.R.); (M.D.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rodriguez-Merchan EC, De la Corte-Rodriguez H, Alvarez-Roman T, Gomez-Cardero P, Encinas-Ullan CA, Jimenez-Yuste V. Total knee arthroplasty in hemophilia: lessons learned and projections of what's next for hemophilic knee joint health. Expert Rev Hematol 2022; 15:65-82. [PMID: 35041571 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2022.2030218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this article has been to review the literature on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in people with hemophilia (PWH), to mention the lessons we have learned from our own experience and to try to find out what the future of this type of surgery will be. AREAS COVERED A Cochrane Library and PubMed (MEDLINE) search of studies related to TKA PWH was analyzed. In PWH, the complication rate after TKA can be up to 31.5%. These include infection (7.1%) and bleeding in the form of hematoma, hemarthrosis or popliteal artery injury (8.9%). In a meta-analysis the revision arthroplasty rate was 6.3%. One-stage or two-stage revision arthroplasty due to infection (septic loosening) is not always successful despite providing correct treatment (both hematological and surgical). In fact, the risk of prosthetic re-infection is about 10%. It is necessary to perform a re-revision arthroplasty, which is a high-risk and technically difficult surgery that can sometimes end in knee arthrodesis or above-the-knee amputation of the limb. EXPERT OPINION TKA (both primary and revision) should be performed in centers specialized in orthopedic surgery and rehabilitation (knee) and hematology (hemophilia), and with optimal coordination between the medical team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain.,Osteoarticular Surgery Research, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research - IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital - Autonomous University of Madrid), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sepsis and Total Joint Arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2022; 53:13-24. [PMID: 34799018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The number of annual total joint arthroplasties (TJA) is increasing. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) occur when there is infection involving the prosthesis and surrounding tissue, which has the potential to develop into sepsis if left untreated. Sepsis in patients who have undergone TJA is life threatening and requires urgent treatment. If sepsis is due to PJI, the focus should be on early intravenous antibiotics with aspiration as soon as possible to diagnose the infection. Patients who develop sepsis after surgery for PJI are particularly at high risk for mortality and need to be treated in the intensive care unit.
Collapse
|