1
|
Carender CN, Bothun CE, Taunton MJ, Perry KI, Bedard NA, Pagnano MW, Abdel MP. 3D-Printed Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties: Excellent Survivorship of 740 Cones at 5 Years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2024:00004623-990000000-01130. [PMID: 38875316 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.23.01196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Porous metaphyseal cones are frequently utilized during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate 3D-printed metaphyseal cones used for revision TKA, with specific emphasis on implant survivorship, radiographic appearance, and clinical outcomes after short-term follow-up. METHODS We identified 740 cones (498 tibial, 242 femoral) that had been inserted during 533 revision TKA procedures that had been performed at a single tertiary care academic institution. Aseptic loosening (n = 199), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 183), and instability (n = 84) were the most common reasons for the index revision. Type-2B or 3 bone loss was present in 67% of the knees. The mean age was 66 years, the mean body mass index was 34 kg/m 2 , and 55% of the patients were female. Serial radiographs were reviewed. The mean duration of follow-up was 4 years. RESULTS The 5-year cumulative incidence of cone revision for aseptic loosening was 1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 3%). The 5-year cumulative incidence of any cone revision or removal was 6% (95% CI, 4% to 9%). In total, 37 cones (19 femoral, 18 tibial) were revised, with PJI (n = 23; 14 recurrent), periprosthetic femoral fracture (n = 3), arthrofibrosis (n = 3), and aseptic loosening of the femoral component and femoral cone (n = 3) as the most common reasons for cone revision. The 5-year cumulative incidence of any TKA re-revision was 14% (95% CI, 11% to 18%). There were a total of 67 re-revisions, with PJI (n = 38), persistent drainage (n = 6), and extensor mechanism disruption (n = 3) being the most common reasons. Radiographically, 2 unrevised femoral cones and 1 unrevised tibial cone appeared to be possibly loose; all 3 cones were in knees with distal femoral replacements or hinged constructs. CONCLUSIONS This large series showed that 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones were very durable at short-term follow-up, with a 5-year cumulative incidence of cone revision for aseptic loosening of 1%. PJI was the most common reason for cone revision and any revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
|
2
|
Eder-Halbedl M, Fink A, Pietsch M, Djahani O, Hofmann S. Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023; 31:5496-5506. [PMID: 37819600 PMCID: PMC10719141 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07593-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Severe metaphyseal bone defects remain a challenge and represent a growing problem in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). The purpose of this study was to examine the survival of first-generation tantalum metal cones (TMC) and to assess clinical and radiographic data obtained from mid- to long-term follow-ups (FU) after RTKA with severe bony defects. METHODS This retrospective case series included 100 consecutive patients of the same centre, who underwent RTKA surgery with TMC for tibia and/or femur bone defects between January 2011 and December 2015. Fourteen patients had died and six were lost for FU, leaving a total of eighty patients (one hundred and twelve TMC) for final evaluation. Clinical parameters including the Knee Society Score (KSS), visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and range of motion (ROM) were determined preoperatively based on the patients' medical charts, and assessed again during the final FU after an average of 6.1 (5-9) years postoperative. Standardised postoperative X-rays were analysed during the final FU visit for osseointegration of the cones, and any signs of implant loosening were assessed with the modified Knee Society Radiographic review criteria. Perioperative and postoperative complications, reoperations, as well as implant and cone re-revisions were analysed. Survivorship analysis was performed with (a) cone-related revision for any reason and (b) implant component revision for any reason. RESULTS Previous RTKA had to be performed due to 64 (80%) aseptic and 16 (20%) septic failures. At the final FU, 75 (94%) tibia and 76 (95%) femur TMCs and implants were clinically stable. One patient experienced loosening of cones and implants at the femur and tibia but denied re-revision surgery. There were eight (10%) reoperations including two early wound healing problems, two inlay changes, two periprosthetic fractures, one debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR), and one secondary patella replacement. The six (7.5%) re-revisions included two aseptic loosening's of the opposite implant without TMC, one arthrodesis for recurrent instability, and three deep infections managed by two two-stage exchanges, and one amputation for persistent infection. At re-revision, all TMC cones were osteointegrated without signs of loosening. The determined clinical parameters showed significant (p < 0.001) postoperative improvement, and objective KSS was rated as excellent in 51%, and as good in 22% of patients at the final FU. The estimated 8-year Kaplan-Meier survival was 95% for TMC and 92.5% for implant components. CONCLUSION Tantalum metal cones (TMC) demonstrate a secure fixation for treatment of severe femoral and tibial metaphyseal bone defects during RTKA. This fixation concept showed excellent mid- to long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes with promising 8-year survival rates for cones and implant components. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Retrospective cohort study, Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Eder-Halbedl
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, LKH Feldbach-Fürstenfeld, Ottokar-Kernstock-Straße 18, 8330, Feldbach, Austria.
| | - Andrea Fink
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - Martin Pietsch
- Department of Orthopedics, LKH-Murtal, Stolzalpe, Stolzalpe 38, 8852, Murau, Austria
| | - Oliver Djahani
- Department of Orthopedics, LKH-Murtal, Stolzalpe, Stolzalpe 38, 8852, Murau, Austria
| | - Siegfried Hofmann
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria
- Department of Orthopedics, LKH-Murtal, Stolzalpe, Stolzalpe 38, 8852, Murau, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Migliorini F, Feierabend M, Hofmann UK. Fostering Excellence in Knee Arthroplasty: Developing Optimal Patient Care Pathways and Inspiring Knowledge Transfer of Advanced Surgical Techniques. J Healthc Leadersh 2023; 15:327-338. [PMID: 38020721 PMCID: PMC10676205 DOI: 10.2147/jhl.s383916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteoarthritis of the knee is common. Early sports trauma or cartilage defects are risk factors for osteoarthritis. If conservative treatment fails, partial or total joint replacement is often performed. A joint replacement aims to restore physiological biomechanics and the quality of life of affected patients. Total knee arthroplasty is one of the most performed surgeries in musculoskeletal medicine. Several developments have taken place over the last decades that have truly altered the way we look at knee arthroplasty today. Some of the fascinating aspects will be presented and discussed in the present narrative review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Medical Centre, Aachen, 52074, Germany
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of Paracelsus Medical University, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
| | - Martina Feierabend
- Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Medical Centre, Aachen, 52074, Germany
| | - Ulf Krister Hofmann
- Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Medical Centre, Aachen, 52074, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rullán PJ, Grits D, Potluri A, Emara AK, Klika AK, Mont MA, Piuzzi NS. Identifying Trends and Quantifying Growth for Technological Innovation in Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of a Patent Database (1990 to 2020). J Knee Surg 2023; 36:1209-1217. [PMID: 36138534 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Technological innovation is the key for surgical progress in knee arthroplasty and improvement in patient outcomes. Exploring patented technologies can help elucidate trends and growth for numerous innovative technologies. However, patent databases, which contain millions of patents, remain underused in arthroplasty research. Therefore, the present study aimed to: (1) quantify patent activity; (2) group patents related to similar technologies into well-defined clusters; and (3) compare growth between technologies in the field of knee arthroplasty over a 30-year period. An open-source international patent database was queried from January 1990 to January 2020 for all patents related to knee arthroplasty A search strategy identified 70,154 patents, of which 24,425 were unique and included analysis. Patents were grouped into 14 independent technology clusters using Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) codes. Patent activity was normalized via a validated formula adjusting for exponential growth. Compound annual growth rates (CAGR) were calculated (5-year, 10-year, and 30-year CAGR) and compared for each cluster. Overall yearly patent activity increased by 2,023%, from 104 patents in 1990 to 2,208 patents in 2020. The largest technology clusters were "drugs" (n = 5,347; 23.8%), "components" (n = 4,343; 19.0%), "instruments" (n = 3,130; 13.7%), and "materials" (n = 2,378; 10.4%). The fastest growing technologies with their 5-year CAGR were: "user interfaces for surgical systems" (58.1%); "robotics" (28.6%); "modularity" (21.1%); "navigation" (15.7%); and "computer modeling" (12.5%). Since 1990, overall patent growth rate has been greatest for "computer modeling" (8.4%), "robotics" (8.0%), "navigation" (7.9%), and "patient-specific instrumentation" (6.4%). Most patents in knee arthroplasty for the last 30 years have focused on drugs, components, instruments, and materials. Recent exponential growth was mainly observed for user interfaces for surgical systems, robotics, modularity, navigation, and computer-assisted technologies. Innovation theory would suggest that these rapidly growing technologies are experiencing high innovation output, increased resource investments, growing adoption by providers, and significant clinical impact. Periodic monitoring of technological innovation via patent databases can be useful to establish trends and future directions in the field of knee arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro J Rullán
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Daniel Grits
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ajay Potluri
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ahmed K Emara
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alison K Klika
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Michael A Mont
- Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nicolas S Piuzzi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Small I, Meghpara M, Stein J, Goh GS, Banerjee S, Courtney PM. Intermediate-Term Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:1839-1843. [PMID: 35398228 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both cones or sleeves have been developed to address metaphyseal bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but few studies have directly compared the outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare the survivorship and aseptic revision rates between metaphyseal cones and sleeves at intermediate follow-up. METHODS We reviewed a consecutive series of 1,172 revision TKA patients between 2009 and 2018 with a minimum two-year follow-up on all patients. We compared demographics, surgical indication, stem fixation, constraint, rates of rerevision, and Short-Form-12 scores between patients with cones and sleeves. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify the effect of cones and sleeves on aseptic rerevision. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare aseptic survivorship of cones and sleeves. RESULTS There were 194 tibial cones (17%), 107 tibial sleeves (9%), 31 femoral cones (3%), and 135 femoral sleeves (12%) with a mean follow-up of 6.5 years (range: 2-12 years). There was no difference in demographics, indication, stem fixation, or constraint (P > .05). Although overall aseptic failure rates may be lower for tibial sleeves, there were no significant differences in survivorship over a one-year, two-year, and five-year follow-up when both tibial and femoral sleeves were directly compared to cones. CONCLUSION Both tibial and femoral sleeves and cones perform well at an intermediate-term follow-up. Further investigation of these two are required to better understand their survivorship relative to each other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilan Small
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael Meghpara
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jonah Stein
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Graham S Goh
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Samik Banerjee
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - P Maxwell Courtney
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|