Implant Malalignment may be a Risk Factor for Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) Following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

Fixed-Bearing and Higher Postoperative Knee Flexion Angle as Predictors of Satisfaction in Asian Patients Undergoing Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Patient-reported satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be affected by various factors. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction rates and identify factors related to patients, surgery, and postoperative knee motion associated with satisfaction in posterior-stabilized TKA among Asian patients.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with primary osteoarthritis who underwent TKA and had a follow-up period of over 2 years. Patient satisfaction was measured using a 5-point Likert scale, and the patients were divided into satisfied and dissatisfied groups. The factors potentially affecting satisfaction were collected, including demographics, comorbidities, surgical options, and knee motion. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.

Results

Of the 858 patients included, 784 (91.4%) were satisfied and 74 (8.6%) were dissatisfied. Fixed-bearing implants and higher postoperative knee flexion angles were associated with satisfaction (odds ratio [OR], 2.366; p = 0.001 and OR, 1.045; p < 0.001, respectively), whereas cerebrovascular disease was related to dissatisfaction (OR, 0.403; p = 0.005). The regression model demonstrated moderate predictability (R 2 = 0.112).

Conclusions

Fixed-bearing implants and higher postoperative knee flexion angles were associated with patient satisfaction following TKA, whereas cerebrovascular disease was associated with dissatisfaction. The identification of these factors could help improve surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction following TKA.

Does Robotic Assisted Technique Improve Patient Utility in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Comparative Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Even if robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) is a widely used technique, there is still a gap of knowledge about whether this technology is effective in improving the patient utility. This measure is of paramount importance for conducting cost effectiveness analysis. The aim of this study was to compare the utility measure derived from self-reported outcomes questionnaires in patients who underwent RATKA compared to patients who underwent the manual surgery.

METHODS

We compared 72 patients operated with a robotic technique with 70 operated with traditional technique. The utility data were collected with the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis index) self-administrated questionnaire that investigates pain, stiffness and functionality of the patients, an then mapped to a utility value through a validated transforming function. We performed three surveys: the first one before the intervention (t0), the second one 1 year after the surgery (t1) and the third one at the 2 year follow up (t2).

RESULTS

we observed higher utility values in both groups. In detail, the mean utility score in the RATKA group increased from 0.37 to 0.71 (t1) and 0.78 (t2), while in the conventional group it increased from 0.41 to 0.78 (t1) and 0.78 (t2). The fixed effect coefficients of t1 and t2 were found to be 0.37 and 0.363 (p < 0.001 for both). The coefficient of the robotic technique, along with its interaction with the t1 and t2 time effect was non-significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if at t1 the utility of patient who underwent RATKA were lower, at longer follow up (t2) we found no significant difference compared to traditional technique, leaving the superiority of robotic assisted technique yet to be proved. Our results may be useful for calculating the gained or lost Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), so that the health care system (or an insurance company) could make an appropriate decision whether to fund the robotic approach or not, after a careful assessment of the incremental costs incurred.

Identifying subgroups of patients that may benefit from robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Secondary analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The aims were to assess whether a specific subgroup(s) of patients had a clinically significant benefit in their knee specific outcome or health-related quality of life (HRQoL) when undergoing robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) when compared to manually performed TKA (mTKA).

METHODS

One hundred patients were randomised to either rTKA or mTKA, 50 to each group, of which 46 and 41 were available for functional review at 6-months, respectively. Subgroup analysis was undertaken for sex, age (<67-years versus ≥ 67-years), preoperative WOMAC score (<40 versus ≥ 40) and EQ-5D utility (<0.604 versus ≥ 0.604).

RESULTS

Male patients undergoing rTKA had a clinically and statistically significant greater improvement in WOMAC pain (mean difference (MD) 16.3, p = 0.011) at 2-months, function (MD 12.6, p = 0.032) and total score (MD 12.7, p = 0.030), and OKS (MD 6.0, p = 0.030) at 6-months. Patients < 67-years old undergoing rTKA had a clinically and statistically significant greater improvement in WOMAC pain (MD 10.3, p = 0.039) at 2-months, and function (MD 12.9, p = 0.040) and total (MD 13.1, p = 0.038) scores at 6-months. Patients with a preoperative WOMAC total score of < 40 points undergoing rTKA had a clinically and statistically significant greater improvement in WOMAC pain (MD 14.6, p = 0.044) at 6-months. Patients with a preoperative EQ-5D utility of <0.604 undergoing rTKA had a clinically and statistically significant greater improvement in WOMAC pain (MD 15.5, p = 0.011) at 2-months.

CONCLUSION

Patients of male sex, younger age, worse preoperative knee specific function and HRQoL had a clinically significantly better early functional outcome with rTKA when compared to mTKA.

Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Osteoarthritic Patients

Background The knee is the joint most commonly affected by osteoarthritis, more than any other. Osteoarthritis is a progressive, long-term condition that leads to the deterioration of joint tissue and cartilage, resulting in pain and impairment. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful intervention that improves functional capability, decreases pain, and enhances quality of life. We conducted this study to evaluate whether radiological parameters following TKA influence the clinical outcomes of patients with knee osteoarthritis. Methods The study was conducted on patients treated for knee osteoarthritis at the Department of Orthopedics, Rajindra Hospital and Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, in collaboration with the Department of Radiology over a period of 1.5 years. A total of 152 patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were included in the study; all underwent TKA. Patients underwent clinical evaluation and were graded using the Knee Society Score (KSS) during follow-up examinations. Pain was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Postoperative X-rays were obtained, and various angles, including the distal femoral angle (DFA), the proximal tibial angle (PTA), and the posterior slope angle (PSA), were measured. Patient follow-up was conducted at three days, three months, and six months. Subsequently, a comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of TKA was performed. Results In this study, a total of 152 patients participated, with the majority falling into the 61-70 age group. Of these patients, 40.13% were female and 59.87% were male. The average medial DFA was 94.05°, the average medial PTA was 89.31°, and the PSA was 6.6°. Patients with a medial DFA of 94.05° (±3), a medial PTA of 89.31° (±3), and a PSA of 6.6° (±3) were categorized into the normal group. Conclusion Patients with DFA, PTA, and PSA in the normal range demonstrate improved KSS and clinical outcomes.

Patients undergoing robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty have a greater improvement in knee-specific pain but not in function

Aims

The aim was to assess whether robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) had greater knee-specific outcomes, improved fulfilment of expectations, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient satisfaction when compared with manual TKA (mTKA).

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was undertaken (May 2019 to December 2021), and patients were allocated to either mTKA or rTKA. A total of 100 patients were randomized, 50 to each group, of whom 43 rTKA and 38 mTKA patients were available for review at 12 months following surgery. There were no statistically significant preoperative differences between the groups. The minimal clinically important difference in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score was defined as 7.5 points.

Results

There were no clinically or statistically significant differences between the knee-specific measures (WOMAC, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)) or HRQoL measures (EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) and EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS)) at 12 months between the groups. However, the rTKA group had significantly (p = 0.029) greater improvements in the WOMAC pain component (mean difference 9.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 18.4) over the postoperative period (two, six, and 12 months), which was clinically meaningful. This was not observed for function (p = 0.248) or total (p = 0.147) WOMAC scores. The rTKA group was significantly (p = 0.039) more likely to have expectation of 'Relief of daytime pain in the joint' when compared with the mTKA group. There were no other significant differences in expectations met between the groups. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction with their knee (p = 0.464), return to work (p = 0.464), activities (p = 0.293), or pain (p = 0.701).

Conclusion

Patients undergoing rTKA had a clinically meaningful greater improvement in their knee pain over the first 12 months, and were more likely to have fulfilment of their expectation of daytime pain relief compared with patients undergoing mTKA. However, rTKA was not associated with a clinically significant greater knee-specific function or HRQoL, according to current definitions.

Comparison of imageless robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty and conventional total knee arthroplasty: early clinical and radiological outcomes of 200 knees

The aim of this study was to compare the short term clinical and radiological outcomes of imageless robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to estimate the accuracy of the two techniques by analysing the outliers after TKA. We have evaluated 200 consecutive knees (158 patients), 100 knees undergoing robotic TKA, and 100 knees treated with conventional TKA. Demographic parameters like age, gender, body mass index, diagnosis and range of motion were obtained. Knee society score (KSS) and Knee society functional score (KSS-F) were used for clinical evaluation. Mechanical alignment (Hip-knee-ankle angle), proximal tibial angle (MPTA), distal femoral angle (LDFA) and tibial slope were analysed for radiological results and outliers were compared between both groups. Outliers were defined when the measured angle exceeded ± 3° from the neutral alignment in each radiological measurement on the final follow-up radiograph.The minimum follow-up was 6 months (range, 6 to 18 months). The preoperative mean HKA angle was 169.7 ± 11.3° in robotic group and 169.3 ± 7.3° in conventional group. There was significant improvement in HKA, LDFA, MPTA and tibial slope compared to the preoperative values in both the groups (p < 0.01). The number of HKA, LDFA and tibial slope outliers were 31, 29 and 37, respectively, in the conventional group compared to 13, 23 and 17 in the robotic group (p < 0.01). There was a significant improvement in the KSS and KSS-F functional scores postoperatively in both the groups (p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the functional scores between the groups postoperatively (p = 0.08). This study showed excellent improvement with both imageless robotic and conventional TKA, with similar clinical outcomes between both groups. However, radiologically robotic TKA showed better accuracy and consistency with fewer outliers compared with conventional TKA.

Referencing the center of the femoral head during robotic or computer-navigated primary total knee arthroplasty results in less femoral component flexion than the traditional intramedullary axis

BACKGROUND

During robotic and computer-navigated primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the center of the femoral head is utilized as the proximal reference point for femoral component position rather than the intramedullary axis. We sought to analyze the effect on femoral component flexion-extension position between these two reference points.

METHODS

We obtained CT 3D-reconstructions of 50 cadaveric intact femurs. We defined the navigation axis as the line from center of the femoral head to center of the knee (lowest point of the trochlear groove) and the intramedullary axis as the line from center of the knee to center of the canal at the isthmus. Differences between these axes in the sagittal plane were measured. Degree of femoral bow and femoral neck anteversion were correlated with the differences between the two femoral axes.

RESULTS

On average, the navigated axis was 1.4° (range, -1.4° to 4.1°) posterior to the intramedullary axis. As such, the femoral component would have on average 1.4° less flexion compared with techniques referencing the intramedullary canal. A more anterior intramedullary compared with navigated axis (i.e., less femoral flexion) was associated with more femoral bow (R2 = 0.7, P < 0.001) and less femoral neck anteversion (R2 = 0.5, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Computer-navigated or robotic TKA in which the center of the femoral head is utilized as a reference point, results in 1.4° less femoral component flexion than would be achieved by referencing the intramedullary canal. Surgeons should be aware of these differences as they may ultimately influence knee kinematics.

Robotic Arm-assisted versus Manual (ROAM) total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Aims

The primary aim was to assess whether robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) had a greater early knee-specific outcome when compared to manual TKA (mTKA). Secondary aims were to assess whether rTKA was associated with improved expectation fulfilment, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient satisfaction when compared to mTKA.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was undertaken, and patients were randomized to either mTKA or rTKA. The primary objective was functional improvement at six months. Overall, 100 patients were randomized, 50 to each group, of whom 46 rTKA and 41 mTKA patients were available for review at six months following surgery. There were no differences between the two groups.

Results

There was no difference between rTKA and mTKA groups at six months according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) functional score (mean difference (MD) 3.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) -5.6 to 13.1); p = 0.425). There was a greater improvement in the WOMAC pain score at two months (MD 9.5 (95% CI 0.6 to 18.3); p = 0.037) in the rTKA group, although by six months no significant difference was observed (MD 6.7 (95% CI -3.6 to 17.1); p = 0.198). The rTKA group were more likely to achieve a minimal important change in their WOMAC pain score when compared to the mTKA group at two months (n = 36 (78.3%) vs n = 24 (58.5%); p = 0.047) and at six months (n = 40 (87.0%) vs n = 29 (68.3%); p = 0.036). There was no difference in satisfaction between the rTKA group (97.8%; n = 45/46) and the mTKA group (87.8%; n = 36/41) at six months (p = 0.096). There were no differences in EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) utility gain (p ≥ 0.389) or fulfilment of patient expectation (p ≥ 0.054) between the groups.

Conclusion

There were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in the change in WOMAC function between mTKA and rTKA at six months. rTKA was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving a clinically important change in knee pain at two and six months, but no differences in knee-specific function, patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life, or expectation fulfilment were observed.

Coronal and Sagittal Component Position in Contemporary TKA: Targeting Native Alignment Optimizes Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Advanced technologies, like robotics, provide enhanced precision for implanting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components; however, optimal component position and limb alignment remain unknown. This study sought to identify sagittal and coronal alignment targets that correlate with minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

A total of 1,311 consecutive TKAs were retrospectively reviewed. Posterior tibial slope (PTS), femoral flexion (FF), and tibio-femoral alignment (TFA) were measured radiographically. Patients were grouped based on whether they achieved multiple MCIDs for PROM scores. Classification and regression tree machine learning models were utilized to identify optimal alignment zones. Mean follow-up was 2.4 years (range, 1 to 11).

RESULTS

The change in PTS and postoperative TFA were most predictive for achieving MCIDs in 90% of the models. Approximating native PTS within 4° correlated with MCID achievement and superior PROMs. Preoperative varus and neutral aligned knees were more likely to meet MCIDs and superior PROM scores when not overcorrected into valgus postoperatively (≥ 7°). Preoperative valgus aligned knees correlated with MCID achievement when postoperative TFA was not overcorrected into substantial varus (<0°). Albeit less impactful, FF ≤ 7° correlated with MCID achievement and superior PROMs regardless of preoperative alignment. Sagittal and coronal alignment measurements had moderate to strong interactions in 13 of 20 models.

CONCLUSION

Optimized PROM MCIDs correlated with approximating native PTS while maintaining similar preoperative TFA and incorporating moderate FF. Study findings demonstrate interactions between sagittal and coronal alignment which may optimize PROMs, highlighting the importance of three-dimensional implant alignment targets.

Achieving functional alignment in total knee arthroplasty: early experience using a second-generation imageless semi-autonomous handheld robotic sculpting system

PURPOSE

In order to minimize errors during achieving the targeted alignment of the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components, robotic-assisted surgery has been introduced with the aim to help surgeons to improve implant survival, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction. The primary goal of this paper is to highlight surgical tips and tricks on how to achieve functional alignment (FA) through intra-operative boney mapping, numeric gap, and alignment data, using the next generation of imageless robotic surgical systems.

METHOD

This retrospective case-series contains planned and achieved data on the FA and joint gap data obtained from 526 patients captured and assessed with use of a semi-autonomous imageless handheld robotic sculpting systems. All patients were operated upon by two experienced TKA surgeons.

RESULTS

The mean difference between planned and achieved alignment was 1.46° (≥ 7° varus group), 1.02° (< 7° varus group), 1.16° (< 7° valgus group), and 1.43° (≥ 7° valgus group). The mean observed planned and achieved extension and flexion gaps were below 1.47 mm for medial extension gaps, 1.12 mm for the lateral extension gaps, 1.4 mm for the medial flexion gaps, and 1.16 mm for the lateral flexion gaps.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of these first cases highlights the capability of the next generation of imageless robotic-assisted total knee replacement using a semi-autonomous handheld robotic sculpting to maintain accuracy of the desired alignment. The system allows the surgeon to choose freely their own alignment philosophy while maintaining efficiency.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Functional Assessment Using a Marker-Less Image Capture System in End-Stage Knee Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Patient self-assessment of knee function in end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) and following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has become standard for defining disability. The relationship of PROMs to functional performance requires a continued investigation. The purpose of this study was to determine correlations between patient demographics, PROMs, and functional performances using a marker-less image capture system (MICS).

METHODS

Patients indicated for elective TKA completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and an office-based functional assessment using a MICS. Patient age, body mass index (BMI), and gender were collected. A total of 112 patients were enrolled. Their mean age was 65.0 (±9.7) years, mean BMI was 32.5 (±6.6) kg/m², and mean KOOS-JR was 14.5 (±5.7). The relationships between patient characteristics, KOOS-JR, MICS Alignment (coronal), MICS Mobility (flexion), and composite Total Joint scores were described using Spearman's correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

BMI was weakly correlated with KOOS-JR (ρ = -0.22, P = .024), whereas age was not. Age and BMI were not correlated with performance scores. There were weak to no correlations between KOOS-JR and MICS Alignment (ρ = -0.01, P = .951), Mobility (ρ = 0.33, P < .001), and Total Joint scores (ρ = 0.06, P = .504).

CONCLUSION

This study found no strong correlation between KOOS-JR and functional performance using a validated MICS for patients with end-stage knee OA. Further study is warranted in determining the relationship between PROMs and performance to optimize outcomes of patients undergoing nonoperative or surgical interventions for knee OA. The use of high-fidelity functional assessment tools that can be integrated into clinical workflow, such as the MICS used in this study, should permit PROM/functional performance comparisons in large populations.

Where are We Now and What are We Hoping to Achieve with Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) has been developed to improve knee kinematics and functional outcomes, expedite recovery, and improve implants long-term survivorship. Robotic devices are classified into active, semi-active, and passive, based on their degree of freedom. Their capacity to provide increased accuracy in implants positioning with reduced radiographic outliers has been widely proved. However, these early advantages are yet to be associated with long-term survivorship. Moreover, multiple drawbacks are still encountered including a variable learning curve, increased setup and maintenance costs, and potential complications related to the surgical technique. Despite recent technologies applied to TKA have failed to prove substantial improvements, robotic-assisted surgery seems to be here to stay and revolutionize the field of TKA. To support its consistent usage on a daily basis, long-term results are still awaited, and further improvements are necessary to reduce the expenses related to it.