Comparison of Anterior-Posterior Axis Versus Transepicondylar Axis in Patients Undergoing Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: One Technique per Knee

Influence of Preoperative Deformity on Flexion Gap Asymmetry in Measured Resection Technique: A Theoretical Study in Navigated Gap Balancing Total Knee Arthroplasties, Done for Varus Knee Osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Disagreement exists on (a) achieving a symmetrical flexion gap and (b) the influence of varus deformity on the flexion gap asymmetry (FGA) in measured resection (MR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to determine the FGA and influence of preoperative deformity on the FGA, based on the MR technique, in varus knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

In 321 navigated TKAs, we released the soft tissues in extension. In 90° flexion, with the tensioner in situ, we calculated the FGA, the angle between the posterior femoral cut (planned 3° external rotation to the posterior condylar line, parallel to the surgical transepicondylar axis, or perpendicular to the Whiteside line) and the proximal tibial resection plane.

RESULTS

The FGA values varied widely, and the risk of >2° and >3° FGA was present in at least 60% and 40% knees, respectively. These risks were high in knees with moderate and severe varus deformity.

CONCLUSIONS

In varus knee osteoarthritis, the risk of FGA (based on the MR technique) was high, especially when the deformity was moderate to severe. Caution is required in MR TKA, and surgeons must consider safer alternatives (gap balancing or hybrid technique) to achieve a symmetrical flexion gap in these knees.

CT scan analysis of implant mating comparing APA versus TEA in simultaneous bilateral TKA: One technique per knee

BACKGROUND

The optimal landmark for setting femoral component rotation in primary TKA remains a debate. This study compares the Anterior-Posterior Axis (APA) versus the Transepicondylar Axis (TEA) in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA, where one reference line was randomized to each knee. Implant mating was assessed via post-operative CT scans.

METHOD

The study included 32 patients with osteoarthritis in both knees with similar varus deformities. All patients underwent the same surgical procedure on both knees, aside from the selected femoral rotation axis line: APA randomized to one side and TEA to the contralateral. Post-operative CT scans were performed in extension to assess in-vivo mating.

RESULTS

CT scan analysis showed mean rotation of the femoral implant externally rotated relative to the radiographic TEA with no significant difference between the APA and TEA groups (p = 0.28). Tibial implant rotation was also externally rotated to the radiographic TEA with no significant difference (p = 0.59). Femoral-tibial implant mating showed a mean external rotation of the tibia relative to the femur in both groups: 0.86 ± 4.0° external rotation in the APA group and 0.23 ± 3.7° external rotation in the TEA group. There was no significant difference between groups (p = 0.52). The range of mating mismatch was 15° in the APA group and 16.5° in the TEA group.

CONCLUSIONS

When using a measured resection, posterior referencing technique, post-operative femoral-tibial implant mating measured by CT scan showed no superiority comparing the APA method versus the TEA method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Randomized prospective study.

Comparison of patient reported outcomes after robotic versus manual total knee arthroplasty in the same patient undergoing staged bilateral knee arthroplasty

Background

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) has been proven to improve accuracy of component positioning and reducing alignment target outliers. However, the clinical benefit of robotics is often debated. Recent studies have shown reduced pain and faster recovery in the immediate post-operative period and may be associated with improved PROMs and satisfaction. The aim of this study was to assess PROMs and satisfaction in a unique patient population undergoing bilateral staged TKA to compare manual (MTKA) and RATKA in the same patient.

Methods

55 patients underwent bilateral staged TKA, performed by a single surgeon at a single institute. Patients who underwent TKA for the first knee with manual technique and RATKA for the second side, were eligible for inclusion in the study. Primary outcome assessed was the Oxford Knee Score and secondary outcomes included the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), patient satisfaction, mean duration for independent ambulation after TKA, and patient perspectives on recovery evaluated with a questionnaire.

Results

Both RATKA and MTKA were associated with comparable PROMs. Though RATKA was associated with improved joint perception (Mean FJS after MTKA surgery was 70.3 (SD = 10.66) and significantly lower than the mean FJS after RATKA (73, SD = 10.95, p-value < 0.01), but the difference was not clinically relevant. A higher proportion of patients were more likely to be very satisfied or satisfied after RATKA. A significant proportion of patients felt the knee operated with RATKA was less painful and felt more natural compared to MTKA at final follow-up (p < 0.01). Majority of patients would undergo RATKA again and recommend robotic-TKA to others.

Conclusion

Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with improved patient satisfaction, faster independent ambulation compared to manual techniques. PROMs however, were comparable without clinically significant differences. Patients preferred robotic-assisted surgery, with a significantly higher proportion perceiving knee operated by RATKA felt more natural.