Ask Patients What They Expect! A Survey Among Patients Awaiting Total Hip Arthroplasty in Germany

Patients' experience on pain outcomes after hip arthroplasty: insights from an information tool based on registry data

BACKGROUND

Arthroplasty registries are rarely used to inform encounters between clinician and patient. This study is part of a larger one which aimed to develop an information tool allowing both to benefit from previous patients' experience after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study focuses on generating the information tool specifically for pain outcomes.

METHODS

Data from the Geneva Arthroplasty Registry (GAR) about patients receiving a primary elective THA between 1996 and 2019 was used. Selected outcomes were identified from patient and surgeon surveys: pain walking, climbing stairs, night pain, pain interference, and pain medication. Clusters of patients with homogeneous outcomes at 1, 5, and 10 years postoperatively were generated based on selected predictors evaluated preoperatively using conditional inference trees (CITs).

RESULTS

Data from 6,836 THAs were analysed and 14 CITs generated with 17 predictors found significant (p < 0.05). Baseline WOMAC pain score, SF-12 self-rated health (SRH), number of comorbidities, SF-12 mental component score, and body mass index (BMI) were the most common predictors. Outcome levels varied markedly by clusters whilst predictors changed at different time points for the same outcome. For example, 79% of patients with good to excellent SRH and less than moderate preoperative night pain reported absence of night pain at 1 year after THA; in contrast, for those with fair/poor SHR this figure was 50%. Also, clusters of patients with homogeneous levels of night pain at 1 year were generated based on SRH, Charnley, WOMAC night and pain scores, whilst those at 10 years were based on BMI alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The information tool generated under this study can provide prospective patients and clinicians with valuable and understandable information about the experiences of "patients like them" regarding their pain outcomes.

Fulfilment of patients' mandatory expectations are crucial for satisfaction: a study amongst 352 patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

PURPOSE

Patient satisfaction with the results of their total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the primary goals of this elective procedure. Furthermore, the association between the fulfilment of patients' expectations and their satisfaction is well known. The aim of this study was to identify the key expectations of patients awaiting a TKA, evaluate their fulfilment, and compare the outcomes between very and not fully satisfied patients.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of patients with knee OA scheduled for primary TKA was performed. Pre- and one-year postoperatively patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed. Expectations and their fulfilment were evaluated via a questionnaire encompassing 31 expectations. Preoperatively, expectations were indicated as mandatory, desirable and not important. Postoperatively, fulfilment was rated as exceeded, fulfilled, partially or not fulfilled, and not applicable. Satisfaction with the results of TKA was measured with a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0-10. Discrimination between not fully satisfied and very satisfied patients was set at ≥ 8, as has been proposed recently. To identify independent predictors of this discrimination, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Complete data sets of 352 patients were analysed. A set of 17 key expectations was identified. Relief of knee pain was fulfilled the most, and improvement of physical function was fulfilled the least. When asked about overall fulfilled expectations, 40% of patients rated them as exceeded, 34% as fulfilled and 26% as less fulfilled than expected. Not fully satisfied patients showed significantly lower PROMs pre- and postoperatively and less fulfilled key expectations. Higher numbers of exceeded and fulfilled mandatory expectations, higher overall fulfilment and better range of motion (ROM) were significant predictors for satisfaction ≥ 8.

CONCLUSION

Patients' expectations of TKA outcomes were high with equal emphasis on knee-related and general health-related aspects. Their fulfilment was positively associated with satisfaction. Surgeons should ask patients about mandatory expectations for successful TKA and counsel them about the likelihood of their fulfilment to avoid unrealistic expectations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

When are patients with osteoarthritis referred for surgery?

Current treatment strategies in hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) involve a combined approach that includes not only modification of risk factors and conservative treatment but also joint-preserving surgical therapy in the early stages, or joint replacement in late OA. With the recent development of new etiological concepts (i.e. hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement as major risk factors for hip OA), treatment alternatives for joint preservation could be extended significantly. Satisfactory results of osteotomies and other reconstructive procedures around hip and knee joints can only be expected in early OA (Kellgren/Lawrence grade 0-II). If patients with advanced radiographic OA grades III-IV do not respond to conservative treatment over at least 3 months and express a relevant burden of disease, joint replacement might be considered. Prior to surgery, potential contraindications must be excluded, patient expectations need to be discussed, and modifiable risk factors, which may negatively influence the outcome, should be optimized.