Go Big or Go Home: Obesity and Total Joint Arthroplasty

Obesity Severity Does Not Associate With Rate, Timing, or Invasiveness of Early Reinterventions After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The use of body mass index (BMI) cutoff values has been suggested for proceeding with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in obese patients. However, the relationship between obesity severity and early reoperations after TKA is poorly defined. This study evaluated whether increased World Health Organization (WHO) obesity class was associated with risk, severity, and timing of reintervention within one year after TKA.

METHODS

There were 8,674 patients from our institution who had a BMI ≥ 30 and underwent unilateral TKA for primary osteoarthritis between 2016 and 2021. Patients were grouped by WHO obesity class: 4,456 class I (51.5%), 2,527 class II (29.2%), and 1,677 class III (19.4%). A chart review was performed to determine patient characteristics and identify patients who underwent any closed or open reintervention requiring anesthesia within the first postoperative year. Regression analyses were performed to identify variables associated with increased odds ratios (ORs) for requiring a reintervention, its timing, and invasiveness.

RESULTS

There were 158 patients (1.8%) who required at least one reintervention, and 15 patients (0.2%) required at least 2 reinterventions. Reintervention rates for obesity classes I, II, and III were 1.8% (n = 81), 2.0% (n = 51), and 1.4% (n = 23), respectively. There were 65 closed procedures (41.1%), 47 minor procedures (29.7%), 34 open with or without liner exchange (21.5%), and 12 revisions with component exchange (7.6%). Obesity class was not associated with reintervention rate (P = .3), timing (P = .36), or invasiveness (P = .93). Diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 2.47; P = .008) was associated with a need for reintervention. Non-Caucasian race (OR = 1.7; P = .01) and Charlson comorbidity index (OR = 2.1; P = .008) were associated with earlier reintervention. No factors were associated with the invasiveness of reintervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The WHO obesity class did not associate with rate, timing, or invasiveness of reintervention after TKA in obese patients. These findings suggest that policies that restrict the indication for elective TKA based only on a BMI limit have limited efficacy in reducing early reintervention after TKA in obese patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Preoperative and Postoperative Weight Change has Minimal Influence on Health Care Utilization and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

As obesity becomes more prevalent, more patients are at risk of lower extremity osteoarthritis and subsequent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to test (1) the association of preoperative weight change with health care utilization and (2) the association of pre- and postoperative weight changes with failure to achieve satisfaction and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for pain (KOOS-Pain) and function (KOOS-PS) 1 year after TKA. Prospectively collected monocentric data on patients who underwent primary TKA were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the influence of BMI and weight change on outcomes while controlling for confounding variables. Outcomes included prolonged length of stay (LOS >3 days), nonhome discharge, 90-day readmission rate, satisfaction, and achievement of MCID for KOOS-Pain and KOOS-PS. Preoperative weight change had no impact on prolonged LOS (gain, p = 0.173; loss, p = 0.599). Preoperative weight loss was associated with increased risk of nonhome discharge (odds ratio [OR]: 1.47, p = 0.003). There was also increased risk of 90-day readmission with preoperative weight gain (OR: 1.27, p = 0.047) and decreased risk with weight loss (OR: 0.73, p = 0.033). There was increased risk of nonhome discharge with obesity class II (OR: 1.6, p = 0.016) and III (OR: 2.21, p < 0.001). Weight change was not associated with failure to achieve satisfaction, MCID in KOOS-Pain, or MCID in KOOS-PS. Obesity class III patients had decreased risk of failure to reach MCID in KOOS-Pain (OR: 0.43, p = 0.005) and KOOS-PS (OR: 0.7, p = 0.007). Overall, pre- and postoperative weight change has little impact on the achievement of satisfaction and clinically relevant differences in pain and function at 1 year. However, preoperative weight gain was associated with a higher risk of 90-day readmissions after TKA. Furthermore, patients categorized in Class III obesity were at increased risk of nonhome discharge but experienced a greater likelihood of achieving MCID in KOOS-Pain and KOOS-PS. Our results raise awareness of the dangers of using weight changes and BMI alone as a measure of TKA eligibility.

Evidence-based and Patient-centered Indication for Knee Arthroplasty - Update of the Guideline

Knee arthroplasty is one of the most frequently performed operations in Germany, with approximately 170000 procedures per year. It is therefore essential that physicians should adhere to an appropriate, and patient-centered indication process. The updated guideline indication criteria for knee arthroplasty (EKIT-Knee) contain recommendations, which are based on current evidence and agreed upon by a broad consensus panel. For practical use, the checklist has also been updated.For this guideline update, a systematic literature research was conducted in order to analyse (inter-)national guidelines and systematic reviews focusing on osteoarthritis of the knee and knee arthroplasty, to answer clinically relevant questions on diagnostic, predictors of outcome, risk factors and contraindications.Knee arthroplasty should solely be performed in patients with radiologically proven moderate or severe osteoarthritis of the knee (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 or 4), after previous non-surgical treatment for at least three months, in patients with high subjective burden with regard to knee-related complaints and after exclusion of possible contraindications (infection, comorbidities, BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2). Modifiable risk factors (such as smoking, diabetes mellitus, anaemia) should be addressed and optimised in advance. After meeting current guideline indications, a shared decision-making process between patients and surgeons is recommended, in order to maintain high quality surgical management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.The update of the S2k-guideline was expanded to include unicondylar knee arthroplasty, the preoperative optimisation of modifiable risk factors was added and the main indication criteria were specified.

Preventive strategies to reduce the rate of periprosthetic infections in total joint arthroplasty; a comprehensive review

The increasing frequency of total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasties (TKA) is marred by the rise in periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and surgical site infections (SSIs), with PJIs incurring costs over $1.62 billion as of 2020 and individual case management averaging $90,000. SSIs additionally burden the U.S. healthcare economy with billions in expenses annually. PJI prevalence in primary THA and TKA ranges from 0.5% to 2.4%, spiking to 20% in revisions and representing 25% of TKA revision causes. Projections estimate up to 270,000 annual PJI cases by 2030. Often caused by gram-positive bacteria, particularly methicillin-resistant staphylococci, these infections demand preventive measures. This review dissects PJI prevention across preoperative, intraoperative, and perioperative phases, aligning with evidence-based CDC and WHO guidelines. Preoperative measures include managing diabetes, obesity, tobacco use, Staphylococcus aureus screening and nasal decolonization, nutritional optimization, and management of inflammatory arthropathies. Intraoperatively, antibiotic prophylaxis, skin preparation, operative room environmental controls, surgical technique precision, and irrigation options are scrutinized. Perioperative concerns focus on anticoagulation, blood management, and infection risk mitigation. Integrating these strategies promotes a patient-centric care model, aiming to reduce PJI incidence, improve patient outcomes, and increase care cost-effectiveness in joint arthroplasty.