High Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury Following Antibiotic-Loaded Spacer Insertion for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: An Updated Review of the Literature

Exploring Acute Kidney Injury Incidence in Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment With Combined Intravenous and Intra-articular Antibiotic Infusion

Background

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are a significant complication following total hip arthroplasty, impacting patient health and healthcare costs. This study examines the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing hip PJI treatment with a combination of intravenous and intra-articular antibiotic infusion therapies.

Methods

A retrospective review of 151 patient records from May 1, 2010 to December 30, 2022 was conducted at a single academic hospital. Patients were treated for hip PJIs using debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention or single-stage revision surgeries. AKI was classified according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria.

Results

Among 151 patients, 17 (11.26%) developed AKI, with 13 cases resolving transiently before discharge. The median onset of AKI was on postoperative day 2, with stage I AKI being the most prevalent, accounting for 64.71% of cases. Diabetes and low baseline serum creatinine levels were identified as independent risk factors for AKI, with odds ratios of 9.69 and 1.09, respectively.

Conclusions

The combined regimen of intra-articular and intravenous antibiotic infusion appears to have a manageable risk profile regarding AKI. This approach could serve as a viable alternative for PJI management, emphasizing the importance of careful patient monitoring and tailored antibiotic regimens. Further studies are recommended to optimize treatment protocols and mitigate risks.

Antibiotic-loaded cement in total joint arthroplasty: a comprehensive review

This review evaluates the decision-making framework for using antibiotic-loaded cement (ALC) in the management of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Drawing on available literature, we offer orthopaedic surgeons a guided discussion on several critical considerations. First, we explore the impact of antibiotic-loading on the mechanical properties of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement, assessing both strength and durability. We then explore the optimal antibiotic dosage to load into cement, aiming to achieve effective local concentrations for infection control without compromising mechanical stability. Furthermore, we explore how cement and antibiotic properties affect the overall antibiotic elution characteristics of ALC. Finally, we discuss risks of systemic toxicity, particularly acute kidney injury, when using ALC. The principal goal in this review is to provide a balanced approach based on best available evidence that optimises antibiotic elution from ALC whilst minimising potential harms associated with its use.

Locally Delivered Antibiotics in Fracture-Related Infection

The prevention and treatment of fracture-related infections (FRIs) pose significant challenges in orthopaedic trauma care, with current practices predominantly relying on systemic antibiotic administration. However, locally delivered antibiotics achieve substantially higher tissue concentrations and minimise systemic side effects. Whilst extensively researched in periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), the use of local delivery methods is increasingly prevalent in FRI prevention and treatment. Various local delivery methods such as powders, aqueous injections and carriers such as cement, bone graft, bioceramics, polymers and hydrogels have been explored. Biodegradable antibiotic carriers offer a promising alternative to non-absorbable carriers (i.e., cement), which necessitate surgical removal. There is good evidence for the use of local antibiotics in preventing and treating FRI, particularly in high-risk fractures or in treating more severe, resistant infections. Despite theoretical concerns, reports of adverse events in human studies are rare. To enhance our understanding of the safety and efficacy of these methods across various fracture patterns, further prospective randomised controlled trials are warranted. This article describes the current strategies and methodologies for FRI prevention and treatment and reviews the existing evidence base.

Bone allograft impregnated with tobramycin and vancomycin delivers antibiotics in high concentrations for prophylaxis against bacteria commonly associated with prosthetic joint infections

Local delivery of antibiotics as prophylaxis for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is frequently used during total hip replacement surgery. Morselized bone allograft impregnated with vancomycin and tobramycin (TobraVanc) could provide effective prophylaxis against bacteria commonly associated with PJIs. In this study, the concentrations of antibiotics released by bone allograft impregnated with TobraVanc were determined by using an in vitro bioassay system entailing measuring inhibition zone diameters caused by antibiotic-impregnated bone chips cast in agar against standard curves. The concentrations were determined in samples of TobraVanc-impregnated bone graft taken before and after the application of the bone graft in the patients undergoing acetabular revision surgery. Antibiotic-impregnated bone grafts, sampled prior to application in the patient, delivered antibiotics in the concentration ranges of 730-9,800 mg/L for tobramycin and 1,300-11,000 mg/L for vancomycin. Samples taken after application in the patient released lower concentrations of tobramycin (490-1,900 mg/L; P < 0.01) and vancomycin (3,000-5,100 mg/L; P < 0.05); however, these concentrations remained well above the tobramycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for investigated, highly tobramycin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strains (MICs > 256 mg/L). At the tested concentrations, bone graft material mixed with TobraVanc delivered antibiotics in potent concentrations above the MICs for bacteria causing PJIs. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and risk of TobraVanc-impregnated bone graft as a prophylactic agent for patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.IMPORTANCEAntibiotic prophylaxis is the cornerstone of successful joint replacement surgery, reducing the risk for the dreaded complication of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) to roughly 0.5%-2% in standard total hip replacement (THR). In addition to systemic antibiotics, antibiotics added locally have the potential to reduce the PJI risk even further, because of the high concentrations that can be achieved in the joint with limited risk for systemic toxicity. The results in the current study show that bone chips impregnated with a combination of tobramycin and vancomycin (TobraVanc) release antibiotics in concentrations that are potent against common bacteria causing PJIs. Especially in high-risk patients, our results support the prophylactic use of TobraVanc in hip replacement surgery requiring the use of a bone graft. A clinical study testing the efficacy of TobraVanc-impregnated bone graft in reducing the incidence of PJI in hip replacement surgery is currently ongoing (EudraCT: 2021-001708-14).

Low incidence of acute kidney injury with combined intravenous and topical antibiotic infusions in periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty

Aims

This study aimed to assess the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with combined intravenous (IV) and topical antibiotic therapy in patients undergoing treatment for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), utilizing the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria for classification.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 162 knees (162 patients) that received treatment for PJI post-TKA with combined IV and topical antibiotic infusions at a single academic hospital from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2022. The incidence of AKI was evaluated using the KDIGO criteria, focussing on the identification of significant predictors and the temporal pattern of AKI development.

Results

AKI was identified in 9.26% (15/162) of the cohort, predominantly presenting as stage 1 AKI, which was transient in nature and resolved prior to discharge. The analysis highlighted moderate anaemia and lower baseline serum creatinine levels as significant predictors for the development of AKI. Notably, the study found no instances of severe complications such as wound dehiscence, skin erosion, or the need for haemodialysis following treatment.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that the combined use of IV and topical antibiotic therapy in the management of PJIs post-TKA is associated with a low incidence of primarily transient stage 1 AKI. This indicates a potentially favourable renal safety profile, advocating for further research to confirm these outcomes and potentially influence treatment protocols in PJI management.

Success Rate After 2-Stage Spacer-Free Total Hip Arthroplasty Exchange and Risk Factors for Reinfection: A Prospective Cohort Study of 187 Patients

BACKGROUND

Two-stage prosthesis exchange is the treatment of choice for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of a total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially when the bone and surrounding soft tissues are compromised or difficult-to-treat pathogens are implicated. The aims of our study were as follows: (1) to determine the outcome of 2-stage prosthesis exchange for the treatment of PJI after THA and (2) to determine the risk factors for reinfection leading to subsequent revision surgeries after reimplantation.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 187 consecutive patients who underwent a 2-stage THA exchange with resection arthroplasty for PJI from 2013 to 2019. The mean (± SD) duration of follow-up was 54.2 ± 24.9 months (range, 36 to 96), and the mean interval until reimplantation was 9.8 ± 8.9 weeks (range, 2 to 38). All patients remained in a spacer-free girdlestone situation between the 2 stages of treatment. Patients who remained infection-free after their 2-stage treatment were considered to have achieved treatment success.

RESULTS

The overall success rate was 85.6%. The cumulative probability of reinfection was 11.5% after one year and 14% after 2 years after reimplantation. High virulence or difficult-to-treat pathogens were significant and independent risk factors for reinfection (HR [hazard ratio] = 3.71, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 1.47 to 9.36, P = .006 and HR = 3.85, 95% CI: 1.73 to 8.57, respectively, P = .001), as was previous 2-stage hip prosthesis exchange (HR = 3.58, 95% CI: 1.33 to 9.62, P = .01). Overall reoperation and revision rates were 26.2 and 16.6%, respectively. Re-infected patients had an 80% higher probability of reoperation than noninfected ones (P < .001, log-rank = 102.6), and they were 55% more likely to undergo revision surgery during their follow-up (P < .001, log-rank = 55.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Reinfection rates after 2-stage spacer-free THA revision for PJI still remain high but are comparable to those including cement spacers. Patients who have had prior failed 2-stage implant exchanges or are infected by high-grade or difficult-to-treat pathogens are at high risk for treatment failure.

Risk Factors and Management of Prosthetic Joint Infections in Megaprostheses-A Review of the Literature

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most common mode of failure of megaprostheses, yet the literature on the topic is scarce, and studies report conflicting data regarding the optimal treatment strategy. Patients with megaprostheses PJI are often immunosuppressed, and surgeons must balance the trade-off between treatment efficacy and morbidity associated with the surgery aiming for infection eradication. Our review on megaprostheses PJI focuses on two axes: (1) risk factors and preventative strategies; and (2) surgical strategies to manage this condition. Risk factors were classified as either unmodifiable or modifiable. Attempts to decrease the risk of PJI should target the latter group. Strategies to prevent PJI include the use of silver-coated implants, timely discontinuation of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, and adequate soft tissue coverage to diminish the amount of dead space. Regarding surgical treatment, main strategies include debridement, antibiotics, implant retention (DAIR), DAIR with modular component exchange, stem retention (DAIR plus), one-stage, and two-stage revision. Two-stage revision is the "gold standard" for PJI in conventional implants; however, its success hinges on adequate soft tissue coverage and willingness of patients to tolerate a spacer for a minimum of 6 weeks. DAIR plus and one-stage revisions may be appropriate for a select group of patients who cannot endure the morbidity of two surgeries. Moreover, whenever DAIR is considered, exchange of the modular components should be performed (DAIR plus). Due to the low volume of megaprostheses implanted, studies assessing PJI should be conducted in a multi-institutional fashion. This would allow for more meaningful comparison of groups, with sufficient statistical power. Level of evidence: IV.