Relation between adhesive capsulitis and acromial morphology

Utility of lateral scapular radiographs in initial evaluation of nontraumatic shoulder conditions

Background

Lateral scapular radiographs have been routinely included in the initial radiographic examination of both traumatic and nontraumatic shoulder conditions. With the advance of modern imaging modalities, the clinical utility of the lateral scapular view has become questionable. The purpose of the study was to assess the utilization of the lateral scapular view among the members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and to determine the clinical utility of the lateral scapular view in the initial evaluation of nontraumatic shoulder conditions.

Methods

The study consisted of two parts. The first part involved an online survey of ASES members, which asked them 3 questions regarding their preference for radiographic evaluation of new patients with nontraumatic shoulder pain. The second part involved a clinical vignette-based survey, where 4 shoulder surgeons at our institution were given 50 clinical vignettes and asked to independently answer 4 questions regarding the most probable diagnosis, abnormal radiographic findings, further imaging studies, and treatment plan for each case. The survey was repeated twice; the first was given without a lateral scapular view, and the second given 4 weeks later with a lateral scapular view included. We obtained diagnostic accuracy and percent agreement of each surgeon over two surveys and intraobserver and interobserver reliability on each variable.

Results

Of a total of 235 ASES members who responded to the online survey, 193 (82.1%) indicated their routine use of a lateral scapular view. The most common reason for obtaining the view was better characterization of acromion morphology (75.4%). The clinical vignette-based survey showed substantial intrarater reliability (κ > 0.6) of the 4 surgeons between the two surveys for the most probable diagnosis, abnormal x-ray findings, and further imaging studies, while the intrarater reliability for treatment plan was moderate (κ = 0.548). The mean diagnostic accuracy of the 4 surgeons was almost equal (74% vs. 75%) between the surveys. Overall, each surgeon's percent agreement across the 2 surveys was over 70%. None of the 4 surgeons recommended a lateral scapular view for further imaging during the first survey; each wanted either advanced imaging (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging) or none.

Discussion

The addition of a lateral scapular radiograph in the presence of other orthogonal views does not appear to improve surgeons' diagnostic accuracy or affect their decision-making on the treatment plan in nontraumatic shoulder conditions. The clinical utility of the lateral scapular view may need to be reassessed in this setting.

Are delayed operations effective for patients with rotator cuff tears and concomitant stiffness? An analysis of immediate versus delayed surgery on outcomes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of immediate rotator cuff repair with capsular release and those of rotator cuff repair after the stiffness was treated with rehabilitative therapy.

METHODS

Between June 2007 and December 2010, we recruited 63 patients with rotator cuff tears and stiffness. In 33 patients arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was performed with capsular release simultaneously (group I). In 30 patients arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was performed after 6 months of preoperative rehabilitation for stiffness (group II). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test score, Constant score, and visual analog scale score for pain and range of motion (ROM) were assessed at the start of the study; at 3, 6, and 12 months; and at the last visit. The postoperative cuff tendon integrity was assessed between 6 and 12 months using magnetic resonance or ultrasound images.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in preoperative demographic data between the groups (P > .05). The mean follow-up period was 21.54 months. After treatment, there was significant improvement in ROM and functional scores in both groups, as measured at the last follow-up (P < .05). No statistical differences were found in clinical scores and ROM at the last follow-up (P > .05). On assessment of the magnetic resonance or ultrasound images taken 6 to 12 months postoperatively, the retear rate for the repaired cuff tendon in each group was 12.1% in group I and 13.4% in group II.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of rotator cuff tears with stiffness, satisfactory results can be achieved either by repairing the tear with simultaneous capsular release or by waiting to perform the repair after preoperative rehabilitation for stiffness. Because a delayed rotator cuff repair after improving ROM offered no clear advantage over an immediate operation, we recommend surgically treating rotator cuff tears with concomitant stiffness early using a simultaneous capsular release method to save time and to avoid unnecessary rehabilitation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

Inflammatory cytokines are overexpressed in the subacromial bursa of frozen shoulder

BACKGROUND

Frozen shoulder is a debilitating condition characterized by gradual loss of glenohumeral motion with chronic inflammation and capsular fibrosis. Yet its pathogenesis remains largely unknown. We hypothesized that the subacromial bursa may be responsible for the pathogenesis of frozen shoulder by producing inflammatory cytokines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We obtained joint capsules and subacromial bursae from 14 patients with idiopathic frozen shoulder and from 7 control subjects to determine the expression levels of interleukin (IL) 1α, IL-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), cyclooxygenase (COX) 1, and COX-2 by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

IL-1α, IL-1β, TNF-α, COX-1, and COX-2 were expressed at significantly high levels in the joint capsules of the frozen shoulder group compared with those of the control group. Intriguingly, IL-1α, TNF-α, and COX-2 were also expressed at significantly high levels in the subacromial bursae of the frozen shoulder group compared with those of the control group. Immunohistochemical analysis showed increased expression of COX-2 in both the joint capsules and subacromial bursae of the frozen shoulder group.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings imply that elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines in the subacromial bursa may be associated with the pathogenesis of inflammation evolving into fibrosis.

The factors affecting stiffness occurring with rotator cuff tear

BACKGROUND

Stiffness after a rotator cuff tear is common, and it affects postoperative prognosis. This study aims to define the factors affecting stiffness that accompanies rotator cuff tear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2002 to May 2009 (84 months), 143 patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Of these, 119 were enrolled as subjects in this study. Preoperative range of motion was measured in all patients. Stiffness of the shoulder was defined as restriction of active and passive motion of 100° of elevation or less, less than 50% of external rotation, and internal rotation only to the sacrum. Factors that can affect stiffness were evaluated, including the type, size, and direction of rotator cuff; duration of symptoms; gender; age; presence of accompanying medical disease; degenerative factors (Goutallier classification); and presence of trauma. Retrospective analysis was conducted accordingly.

RESULTS

A statistically significantly higher degree of stiffness was seen for full-thickness tears than for partial-thickness tears (P = .0187). Between 2 groups that were divided by direction of rotator cuff tear, posterosuperior cuff tears showed a statistically significantly higher prevalence of stiffness (P = .0415). Patients with trauma had a statistically higher prevalence of stiffness (P = .0264). The other factors did not show significant differences.

CONCLUSION

In patients with rotator cuff tear, the type and direction of rotator cuff tear and the presence of trauma seem to increase the limitation of preoperative joint range of motion.

Shoulder stiffness

Shoulder stiffness is commonly encountered in clinical practice but varies greatly in severity and etiology. Loss of shoulder range of motion can be a patient's primary complaint or may be a secondary finding. Possible causes of stiffness include guarding due to pain or secondary gain issues (nonanatomic), true mechanical blockage due to acute or chronic trauma, adhesive capsulitis, rotator cuff disease, or surgery on or near the shoulder. This review includes a more detailed discussion of these causes as well as the appropriate history and physical and diagnostic testing recommended for each. Finally, treatment strategies for each group of patients will be presented.

Upper extremity: emphasis on frozen shoulder

Adhesive capsulitis, or frozen shoulder syndrome, is a condition characterized by gradual loss of active and passive glenohumeral motion. The etiology of adhesive capsulitis is unknown. Treatment methods include supervised benign neglect, physical therapy, intra-articular corticosteroid injections, closed manipulation under anesthesia, arthroscopic capsular release, and open surgical release. Approximately 70% of patients presenting with adhesive capsulitis are women; however, the role of sex in the etiology, development, and outcome of treatment for adhesive capsulitis remains unclear. Individualized treatment is necessary following thorough evaluation of patient symptoms and stage of the disease.