A reproducible landmark for the tibial tunnel origin in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: avoiding a vertical graft in the coronal plane

Relationship Between Number of Lateral Intercondylar Ridges and Area of Denser Bone on the Lateral Intercondylar Wall

Background:

A deeper understanding of the anatomy of the intercondylar notch of the femur may help reduce technical errors during anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Purposes:

To classify the number of ridges on the lateral intercondylar wall, identify factors influencing the number of ridges, and define the relationship between the area of denser bone on the lateral intercondylar wall and the lateral intercondylar ridge.

Study Design:

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods:

Included were 89 patients with computed tomography (CT) images of the knee joint. On full lateral view of the lateral femoral condyle, the authors evaluated for the presence of a lateral intercondylar ridge. The height and area of the lateral intercondylar wall (notch height and lateral notch area) and the length of Blumensaat line were calculated. Notch outlet length, axial notch area, notch width index, and transepicondylar length were also calculated using 3-dimensional CT. Maximum intensity projection was used to identify the area of denser bone on the femoral lateral intercondylar wall, and the relationship between this area and the lateral intercondylar ridge was investigated.

Results:

The lateral intercondylar ridge exhibited 3 types of morphological variations. The invisible type (no ridge) was observed in 20 knees (22.5%); the ridge type (1 ridge), in 23 knees (25.8%); and the plateau type (2 ridges), in 46 knees (51.7%). There were significant differences in notch height, lateral notch area, Blumensaat line length, and denser bone area among the ridge types (P ≤ .031 for all). The locations of the anterior ridge of the plateau type and of all 23 ridges of the ridge type corresponded to the anterior margin line of the area of denser bone.

Conclusion:

Significant differences were seen in the 3 types of lateral intercondylar ridges. The anterior margin line of the denser bone area on the lateral intercondylar wall was found to correspond to the anterior border of the plateau type and the ridge type.

Clinical Relevance:

The variations in the lateral intercondylar ridge may affect measurement accuracy during evaluation of ACL tunnel position while using the ridge as a landmark. The plateau-type ridge and the area of denser bone on the lateral intercondylar wall may provide a new way for surgeons to determine the femoral tunnel.

Transtibial versus independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of femoral aperture positioning

Background

Femoral tunnel can be drilled through tibial tunnel (TT), or independent of it (TI) by out-in (OI) technique or by anteromedial (AM) technique. No consensus has been reached on which technique achieves more proper femoral aperture position because there have been evolving concepts in the ideal place for femoral aperture placement. This meta-analysis was performed to analyze the current literature comparing femoral aperture placement by TI versus TT techniques in ACL reconstruction.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of English-language literature in PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for articles comparing femoral aperture placement by TI versus TT techniques with aperture position assessed by direct measurement or by postoperative imaging, PXR and/or CT and/or MRI.

Results

We included 55 articles with study population of 2401 knees of whom 1252 underwent TI and 1149 underwent TT techniques. The relevant baseline characteristics, whenever compared, were comparable between both groups. There was nonsignificant difference between TI and TT techniques in the distance from aperture center to footprint center and both techniques were unable to accurately recreate the anatomic footprint position. TI technique significantly placed aperture at more posterior position than TT technique. TI technique significantly lowered position of placed aperture perpendicular to Blumensaat’s line (BL) than TT technique, and modifications to TT technique had significant effect on this intervention effect. Regarding sagittal plane aperture placement along both AP anatomical axis and BL, there was nonsignificant difference between both techniques.

Conclusion

Modifications to TT technique could overcome limitations in aperture placement perpendicular to BL. The more anterior placement of femoral aperture by TT technique might be considered, to some extent, a proper position according to recent concept of functional anatomical ACL reconstruction.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03040-5.

[Progress of different methods for femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction]

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the progress of different methods for femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and provide a clinical reference for treatment of ACL rupture.

METHODS

The literature about the femoral tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction was widely reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages and the clinical results of each method were summarized.

RESULTS

Currently in ACL reconstruction, methods for femoral tunnel positioning include transtibial technique (TT), anteromedial technique (AM), outside-in (OI), modified TT (mTT), and computer assisted surgery. There is no significant difference in the postoperative effectiveness between TT technique and AM technique. Compared with the TT technique, the OI technique has higher rotational stability of knee, but there is no significant difference in clinical results. The femoral tunnel located by mTT technique is closer to the anatomical placement than that of TT technique, but mTT technique is not effective for systematically anatomic femoral tunnel positioning, and further research is needed to prove its advantages.

CONCLUSION

Different femoral tunnel positioning methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no definite evidence that one is superior than the rest.

Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Guiding Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Position in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study

Background:

Femoral and tibial tunnel malposition for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is correlated with higher failure rate. Regardless of the surgical technique used to create ACL tunnels, significant mismatches between the native and reconstructed footprints exist.

Purpose:

To compare the position of tunnels created by a standard technique with the ones created based on preoperative 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (3D MRI) measurements of the ACL anatomic footprint.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

Using 3D MRI, the native ACL footprints were identified. Tunnels were created on 16 knees (8 cadavers) arthroscopically. On one knee of a matched pair, the tunnels were created based on 3D MRI measurements that were provided to the surgeon (roadmapped technique), while on the contralateral knee, the tunnels were created based on a standard anatomic ACLR technique. The technique was randomly assigned per set of knees. Postoperatively, the positions of the tunnels were measured using 3D MRI.

Results:

On the tibial side, the median distance between the center of the native and reconstructed ACL footprints in relation to the root of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus medially was 1.7 ± 2.2 mm and 1.9 ± 2.8 mm for the standard and roadmapped techniques, respectively (P = .442), while the median anteroposterior distance was 3.4 ± 2.4 mm and 2.5 ± 2.5 mm for the standard and roadmapped techniques, respectively (P = .161). On the femoral side, the median distance in relation to the apex of the deep cartilage (ADC) distally was 0.9 ± 2.8 mm and 1.3 ± 2.1 mm for the standard and roadmapped techniques, respectively (P = .195), while the median distance anteriorly from the ADC was 1.2 ± 1.3 mm and 4.6 ± 4.5 mm for the standard and roadmapped techniques, respectively (P = .007).

Conclusion:

Providing precise radiological measurements of the ACL footprints does not improve the surgeon’s ability to position the tunnels. Future studies should continue to attempt to provide tools to improve the tunnel position in ACLR.

Clinical Relevance:

This cadaveric study indicates that despite the use of 3D MRI in understanding the ACL anatomy, re-creating the native ACL footprints remains a challenge.

Arthroscopic anatomy medial to the coracoid: an anatomic study of the axillary and musculocutaneous nerves

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to provide arthroscopic measurements and orientations of the axillary and musculocutaneous nerves medial to the coracoid.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 29 patients undergoing arthroscopic subscapularis repair and arthroscopic cadaveric dissection of 23 shoulders was used to analyze neuroanatomical distances to arthroscopic landmarks and to document the orientations of the axillary and musculocutaneous nerves using a clock face analogy. The clock face data was analyzed by separating the clock face into four quadrants and the frequency of any crossing nerve within each of the four quadrants was then determined.

RESULTS

In vivo, the axillary nerve was found 1.5 ± 0.5 cm medial to the coracoid tip and the musculocutaneous nerve was found 1.6 ± 0.6 cm medial to the coracoid tip. In cadavera, the axillary nerve was found 2.0 ± 0.6 cm medial to the coracoid tip and the musculocutaneous nerve was found 1.5 ± 0.5 cm medial to the coracoid tip. The posterosuperior quadrant of the subcoracoid space contained a crossing nerve in 4 of 29 (13.8%) patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair medial to the coracoid, compared to 9 of 23 (39.1%) cadavera undergoing arthroscopic dissection medial to the coracoid. The posteroinferior quadrant contained a crossing nerve in 16 of 29 (55.2%) patients compared to 17 of 23 (73.9%) cadavera.

CONCLUSIONS

The axillary and musculocutaneous nerves run in close proximity to the coracoid tip and coracoid arch, most consistently within 1-2 cm medial to these structures, which is closer than has been previously documented in the literature. Crossing nerves are least frequently encountered within the posterosuperior quadrant of the subcoracoid space medial to the coracoid, followed by the posteroinferior quadrant. Arthroscopic dissection of this space should begin in the posterosuperior quadrant and carefully progress to the posteroinferior quadrant to decrease the risk of intraoperative nerve injury. Given the close proximity and frequently encountered nerves in this area, extreme caution must be exercised when working arthroscopically within the subcoracoid space.

Anatomic tunnel placement can be achieved with a modification to transtibial technique in single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A cadaver study

Placing the tunnels in the anatomic positions is important for successful restoration of knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). It has been shown that it is difficult to place the tunnels in the anatomic position using the transtibial technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of each step of our modified transtibial technique (mTT) on the positioning of the femoral tunnel so as to assess whether the mTT could achieve anatomic placements of the tunnels without tibial tunnel expansion. Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were used. First, the tibial tunnel was created in the center of ACL footprint. Then, a pin was inserted through the tibial tunnel using a femoral guide by four stepwise techniques: transtibial technique, additional anterior drawer force applied to the proximal tibia, another additional varus force applied to the tibia and finally, additional external rotation of the tibia and the femoral guide (mTT). Then, tibial tunnel was re-reamed using mTT with 10mm-diameter reamer. The pin positions in each technique on the femur were evaluated by the quadrant method and shapes of the tibial tunnel apertures were evaluated. Femoral pin positions in the four techniques were 23.6±4.5%, 28.4±3.4%, 30.1±3.8%, 33.2±4.5% in the superior-inferior position, and 23.9±4.3%, 26.2±3.7%, 32.0±4.3%, 36.9±4.8% in the anterior-posterior position, respectively. Pin position shifted to more inferior and posterior position with each step of mTT (all p values comparing superior-inferior and anterior-posterior positions of each step with positions of previous step were 0.008 or less). Using mTT, tibial tunnel aperture was 10.5±0.3mm wide and 12.9±1.1mm long. In conclusion, anatomic placements of femoral tunnels in ACLR without excessive tibial tunnel expansion could be achieved using the mTT.

Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction is possible with use of the modified transtibial technique: a comparison with the anteromedial transportal technique

BACKGROUND

Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is essential to the restoration of normal knee kinematics and to achieving successful results after ACL surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction can be performed with use of the modified transtibial technique such that the tunnel characteristics are not substantially different from those of the anteromedial transportal technique, with comparable clinical results.

METHODS

One hundred and four patients underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction performed with use of either the modified transtibial technique or the anteromedial transportal technique. Each group included fifty-two patients retrospectively matched on the basis of age, sex, and body mass index. All patients had postoperative computed tomography (CT) and a minimum duration of follow-up of twenty-four-months. CT parameters, including tunnel position, tunnel length and shape, and graft obliquity, were evaluated. Clinical assessments were based on manual laxity tests, arthrometric analysis, and clinical scores recorded preoperatively and at the time of follow-up.

RESULTS

The femoral tunnel was placed at a slightly inferior and anterior position with use of the modified transtibial technique compared with the anteromedial transportal technique, but the difference was not significant (superior-inferior mean [and standard deviation], 35.7% ± 3.1% versus 33.9% ± 4.1%, p > 0.05, and anterior-posterior mean, 31.6 ± 6.8% versus 35.1 ± 6.9%, p > 0.05, as assessed with use of the quadrant method). The femoral tunnel length was significantly longer (p < 0.05) and the tibial tunnel length was significantly shorter (p < 0.05) with use of the modified transtibial technique compared with the anteromedial transportal technique (mean femoral tunnel length, 40.5 ± 4.2 mm versus 34.4 ± 2.6 mm and mean tibial tunnel length, 32.3 ± 3.1 mm versus 35.5 ± 2.7 mm); however, tunnel length was sufficient to allow for adequate fixation. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of tibial tunnel position, graft obliquity, tibial tunnel widening, and clinical results.

CONCLUSIONS

Tunnel characteristics including anatomic position, graft obliquity, and tunnel widening after single-bundle ACL reconstruction performed with use of the modified transtibial technique were not significantly different from those of the anteromedial transportal technique, and clinical results were comparable.

Revision rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft or autograft in a population 25 years old and younger

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes and revision rates for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) allografts versus BPTB autografts in a population of patients aged 25 years and younger.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients 25 years or younger undergoing ACL reconstruction with either a patient-selected BPTB allograft or BPTB autograft fixed with biocomposite interference screws was retrospectively reviewed. Multiligamentous and posterior cruciate ligament tears were excluded. All allografts were from a single source and not chemically processed or irradiated. Two graft-specific rehabilitation programs were used. The primary outcome measure was graft failure. Failure was defined as a subsequent ACL revision surgery, 2+ Lachman test, positive pivot-shift, or side-to-side KT difference of greater than 5 mm. Secondary outcome measures included Cincinnati, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) activity scores.

RESULTS

In 81 patients at least 24 months after surgery (28 allografts; 53 autografts), 7 failures were identified: 2 of 28 (7.1%) allografts and 5 of 53 (9.4%) autografts. Mean Cincinnati scores improved from 54.6 and 39.5 (allografts and autografts, respectively) to 86.2 and 85.1. Mean Lysholm scores improved from 60.3 and 44.8 (allografts and autografts, respectively) to 89.9 and 87.0. Average KT differences were 0.59 mm (allograft) and 0.34 mm (autograft group) (P = .58). IKDC activity scores were 2.9 (allografts) and 3.1 (autografts) postoperatively (P = .32).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a patient-choice ACL graft selection program after appropriate counseling and using graft-specific rehabilitation programs, not chemically processed or irradiated BPTB allograft reconstructions have no greater failure rate than autografts in patients aged 25 years and younger at a minimum 2-year follow-up. No significant differences in Cincinnati, Lysholm, and IKDC activity scores were found between these 2 groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Radiographic findings in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from the Mars cohort

The Multicenter ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) Revision Study (MARS) group was developed to investigate revision ACL reconstruction outcomes. An important part of this is obtaining and reviewing radiographic studies. The goal for this radiographic analysis is to establish radiographic findings for a large revision ACL cohort to allow comparison with future studies. The study was designed as a cohort study. Various established radiographic parameters were measured by three readers. These included sagittal and coronal femoral and tibial tunnel position, joint space narrowing, and leg alignment. Inter- and intraobserver comparisons were performed. Femoral sagittal position demonstrated 42% were more than 40% anterior to the posterior cortex. On the sagittal tibia tunnel position, 49% demonstrated some impingement on full-extension lateral radiographs. Limb alignment averaged 43% medial to the medial edge of the tibial plateau. On the Rosenberg view (45-degree flexion view), the minimum joint space in the medial compartment averaged 106% of the opposite knee, but it ranged down to a minimum of 4.6%. Lateral compartment narrowing at its minimum on the Rosenberg view averaged 91.2% of the opposite knee, but it ranged down to a minimum of 0.0%. On the coronal view, verticality as measured by the angle from the center of the tibial tunnel aperture to the center of the femoral tunnel aperture measured 15.8 degree ± 6.9% from vertical. This study represents the radiographic findings in the largest revision ACL reconstruction series ever assembled. Findings were generally consistent with those previously demonstrated in the literature.

Arthroscopic agreement among surgeons on anterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement

BACKGROUND

Little is known about surgeon agreement and accuracy using arthroscopic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tunnel positioning.

PURPOSE

To investigate agreement on ACL tunnel position evaluated arthroscopically between operating surgeons and reviewing surgeons. We hypothesized that operating and evaluating surgeons would characterize tunnel positions significantly differently.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twelve surgeons drilled ACL tunnels on 72 cadaveric knees using transtibial (TT), medial portal (MP), or 2-incision (TI) techniques and then completed a detailed assessment form on tunnel positioning. Then, 3 independent blinded surgeon reviewers each arthroscopically evaluated tunnel position and completed the assessment form. Statistical comparisons of tunnel position evaluation between operating and reviewing surgeons were completed. Three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) scans were performed and compared with arthroscopic assessments. Arthroscopic assessments were compared with CT tunnel location criteria.

RESULTS

Operating surgeons were significantly more likely to evaluate femoral tunnel position (92.6% vs 69.2%; P = .0054) and femoral back wall thickness as "ideal" compared with reviewing surgeons. Tunnels were judged ideal by reviewing surgeons more often when the TI technique was used compared with the MP and TT techniques. Operating surgeons were more likely to evaluate tibial tunnel position as ideal (95.5% vs 57.1%; P < .0001) and "acceptable" compared with reviewers. The ACL tunnels drilled using the TT technique were least likely to be judged as ideal on the tibia and the femur. Agreement among surgeons and observers was poor for all parameters (κ = -0.0053 to 0.2457). By 3D CT criteria, 88% of femoral tunnels and 78% of tibial tunnels were placed within applied criteria.

CONCLUSION

Operating surgeons are more likely to judge their tunnels favorably than observers. However, independent surgeon reviewers appear to be more critical than results of 3D CT imaging measures. When subjectively evaluated arthroscopically, the TT technique yields more subjectively poorly positioned tunnels than the TI and MP techniques. Surgeons do not agree on the ideal placement for single-bundle ACL tunnels.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study demonstrates that surgeons do not currently uniformly agree on ideal single-bundle tunnel placement and that the TT technique may yield more poorly placed tunnels.

Comparison of 4 femoral tunnel drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine which femoral tunnel drilling technique most closely reproduces the anatomic femoral footprint and has acceptable tunnel length and tunnel orientation.

METHODS

We divided 20 cadaveric knees into 4 equal groups. Arthroscopically, the anatomic femoral footprint was marked with an awl as the tunnel starting point. In group 1 the femoral tunnel was drilled through a tibial tunnel. In groups 2 and 3 the femoral tunnel was drilled through the anteromedial arthroscopy portal, with a rigid drill and flexible drill, respectively. In group 4 the femoral tunnel was drilled with the outside-in technique over a pin positioned with an arthroscopic femoral guide. Measurements of the tunnel length, aperture, and placement were taken from 3-dimensional computed tomography scans.

RESULTS

Tunnel length for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 averaged 42.08 mm, 37.73 mm, 28.92 mm, and 31.96 mm (P = .039). The mean coronal angle of the tunnels as measured from the line tangent to the posterior femoral condyles was 63.30°, 61.22°, 51.77°, and 45.00° (P = .007), and the mean distance from the inferior articular surface to the edge of the tunnel was 5.60 mm, 4.36 mm, 2.42 mm, and -0.63 mm (P = .008) for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. There was no statistical difference in footprint length, width, area, or distance from the posterior articular margin.

CONCLUSION

Drilling by the transtibial technique produces the most vertical and longest tunnels. Independent drilling techniques produce the most anatomic tunnels but at the expense of tunnel length.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

When the orthopaedic surgeon is performing ACL reconstruction, it is critical to achieve anatomic placement of the graft, as well as maintain appropriate tunnel length.

Three-dimensional anatomic evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament for planning reconstruction

Anatomic study related to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery has been developed in accordance with the progress of imaging technology. Advances in imaging techniques, especially the move from two-dimensional (2D) to three-dimensional (3D) image analysis, substantially contribute to anatomic understanding and its application to advanced ACL reconstruction surgery. This paper introduces previous research about image analysis of the ACL anatomy and its application to ACL reconstruction surgery. Crucial bony landmarks for the accurate placement of the ACL graft can be identified by 3D imaging technique. Additionally, 3D-CT analysis of the ACL insertion site anatomy provides better and more consistent evaluation than conventional “clock-face” reference and roentgenologic quadrant method. Since the human anatomy has a complex three-dimensional structure, further anatomic research using three-dimensional imaging analysis and its clinical application by navigation system or other technologies is warranted for the improvement of the ACL reconstruction.

Three femoral fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of fixation on the lateral cortex versus the anterior cortex

PURPOSE

To evaluate the biomechanical properties of 3 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction femoral fixation devices in a porcine model with implantation on both the lateral femoral cortex and the anterior femoral cortex.

METHODS

ACL reconstructions with an 8-mm porcine tendon graft were performed on 48 porcine femurs with the EndoButton CL (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA), ToggleLoc with ZipLoop technology (Biomet Sports Medicine, Warsaw, IN), or EZLoc (Biomet Sports Medicine). In 8 specimens for each implant, the femoral tunnel was drilled from the 10:30 surgical position out the lateral cortex. In another 8 specimens for each implant, the tunnel was drilled from the 10:30 position to a standardized anterior femoral surface. Cyclic testing was performed on an MTS testing machine (MTS, Eden Prairie, MN) from 50 N to 450 N for 2,000 cycles, followed by load-to-failure testing in specimens that survived. The cortical thickness and location of the implant exit were recorded.

RESULTS

In the lateral femur group, 0 of the EZLoc devices, 2 of the ToggleLoc devices, and 3 of the EndoButtons completed cyclic testing. In the anterior femur group, 1 of the EZLoc devices, 5 of the ToggleLoc devices, and 5 of the EndoButtons completed cyclic testing (P = .012). In the anterior femur group, the ToggleLoc exhibited higher 2,000-cycle elongation (5.46 +/- 1 mm) than the EndoButton (3.55 +/- 0.6 mm) (P = .005). The EndoButton showed a higher first failure load (1,190.9 +/- 150.0 N) than the ToggleLoc (912.6 +/- 82.4 N) (P = .007). The anterior cortex (1.4 mm) was thinner than the lateral cortex (1.7 mm) (P = .0002).

CONCLUSIONS

The EndoButton provided the strongest ACL femoral fixation with significantly less graft-implant elongation and significantly higher failure loads. It was also shown in a porcine model that implants on the anterior cortical surface perform better than those on the lateral surface. Increased cortical thickness, in the range tested, was not associated with improved implant performance in the porcine model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The EndoButton provided the best ACL femoral fixation of the devices tested.

Femoral tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo imaging analysis comparing transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel-independent techniques

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have questioned the ability of the transtibial technique to place the anterior cruciate ligament graft within the footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament on the femur. There are limited data directly comparing the abilities of transtibial and tibial tunnel-independent techniques to place the graft anatomically at the femoral attachment site of the anterior cruciate ligament in patients.

HYPOTHESIS

Because placement with the tibial tunnel-independent technique is unconstrained by the tibial tunnel, it would allow for more anatomic tunnel placement compared with the transtibial technique.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

High-resolution, multiplanar magnetic resonance imaging and advanced 3-dimensional modeling techniques were used to measure in vivo femoral tunnel placement in 8 patients with the transtibial technique and 8 patients with a tibial tunnel-independent technique. Femoral tunnel placement in 3 dimensions was measured relative to the center of the native anterior cruciate ligament attachment on the intact contralateral knee.

RESULTS

The tibial tunnel-independent technique placed the graft closer to the center of the native anterior cruciate ligament attachment compared with the transtibial technique. The transtibial technique placed the tunnel center an average of 9 mm from the center of the anterior cruciate ligament attachment, compared with 3 mm for the tibial tunnel-independent technique. The transtibial technique resulted in a more anterior and superior placement of the tunnel compared with the tibial tunnel- independent technique.

CONCLUSION

The tibial tunnel-independent technique allowed for more anatomic femoral tunnel placement compared with the transtibial technique.

Independent drilling outperforms conventional transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Optimal tunnel placement is critical in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery, yet the method used to drill the tunnels may compromise their placement.

HYPOTHESIS

An independent drilling method versus a conventional transtibial drilling method will place tunnels in different locations and produce reconstructions with different kinematics.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten pairs of knees had anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions produced by either a conventional transtibial drilling method or an independent drilling method. The location of the tunnels was recorded, and the knees were tested for laxity in the normal state, with the anterior cruciate ligament removed, and with the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed. A surgical navigation system guided the placement of the independently drilled tunnels and measured joint laxity in response to various combinations of anterior force and rotational torques.

RESULTS

The conventional transtibial drilling method used in this study placed tibial tunnels posterior and femoral tunnels superior relative to their footprints and resulted in more vertical grafts. In contrast, the independently drilled tibial and femoral tunnels were more anterior and central in their respective footprints, resulting in more horizontal grafts. The horizontal grafts of the independent drilling method were superior to the vertical grafts of this study's transtibial drilling method in restoring normal anterior and rotational knee laxity.

CONCLUSION

An independent drilling method can produce tunnels with superior function compared with tunnels produced by a conventional transtibial drilling method.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions will be improved if grafts are centered in their anatomical insertions by an independent drilling method versus grafts placed by a conventional transtibial drilling method.

Differences in graft orientation using the transtibial and anteromedial portal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a magnetic resonance imaging study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in graft orientation between transtibial (TT) and anteromedial (AM) portal technique using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Fifty-six patients who were undergoing ACL reconstruction underwent MRI of their healthy and reconstructed knee. Thirty patients had ACL reconstruction using the TT (group A), while in the remaining 26 the AM (group B) was used. In the femoral part graft orientation was evaluated in the coronal plane using the femoral graft angle (FGA). The FGA was defined as the angle between the axis of the femoral tunnel and the joint line. In the tibial part graft orientation was evaluated in the sagittal plane using the tibial graft angle (TGA). The TGA was defined as the angle between the axis of the tibial tunnel and a line perpendicular to the long axis of the tibia. The ACL angle of the normal knee in the sagittal view was also calculated. The mean FGA for group A was 72 degrees, while for the group B was 53 degrees and this was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The mean TGA for group A was 64 degrees, while for the group B was 63 degrees (P = 0.256). The mean intact ACL angle for group A was 52 degrees, while for the group B was 51 degrees. The difference between TGA and intact ACL angle was statistically significant (P < 0.001) for both groups. Using the AM portal technique, the ACL graft is placed in a more oblique direction in comparison with the TT technique in the femoral part. However, there are no differences between the two techniques in graft orientation in the tibial part. Normal sagittal obliquity is not restored with both techniques.