Arthroscopic debridement and synovectomy for treating basal joint arthritis

Do osteophytes alter thumb carpometacarpal Biomechanics? a preliminary in vitro study

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is prevalent and debilitating, marked by substantial loss of range of motion (ROM) and overall function. CMC OA is associated with osteophyte growth, but the impact of this growth on CMC ROM has not been systematically characterized. Our goal was to determine whether osteophytes decrease CMC ROM and, if so, whether these decreases are direction-dependent. A robotic musculoskeletal simulation system was used to manipulate 18 CMC specimens with a range of joint health following three test protocols: (1) Rotational ROM in flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, and 20 combined directions, (2) Internal/External Rotation (IR/ER), and (3) Translational ROM in volar, dorsal, radial, ulnar, and 4 combined directions. Osteophyte volume (OV) was computed in total and by volar, dorsal, radial, and ulnar quadrants, and correlations with ROM were computed by direction and in total. We found that an increase in overall trapezial OV was associated with a reduction in overall rotational ROM and IR/ER, but not with translational ROM. We found decreased extension was associated with increased ulnar, volar, and radial OV, and decreased abduction was associated with increased volar OV. Decreased internal rotation was associated with increased ulnar, volar, and radial OV. The proposed method and findings of this pilot study will lay the groundwork for a larger investigation into the relationship between pathological structure and function in the CMC joint.

Arthroscopic debridement, synovectomy, and thermal shrinkage for basal joint arthritis

BACKGROUND

Ligamentous laxity, cartilage wear, and diffuse synovitis are frequently seen in thumb basal joint arthritis. Although these degenerative changes may be mild for the majority, they have the potential to cause discomfort during movement and compromised hand function. This study assesses the long-term outcomes of arthroscopic debridement, synovectomy, and thermal shrinkage in managing early-stage basal joint arthritis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with basal joint arthritis who underwent arthroscopic debridement, synovectomy, and thermal shrinkage between November 2010 and January 2021 by a single surgeon at our medical institute. We assessed functional outcomes, thumb range of motion, perioperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, return to work and satisfaction level.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients (13 hands), with a mean follow-up of 72 months, were included in this study. Significant improvements were observed in pain scores and functional outcomes, along with a reduction in postoperative NSAID use. Patients also reported a relatively quick return to work and a high satisfaction level.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the benefits of arthroscopic intervention, providing a minimally invasive approach with favorable long-term outcomes for patients with symptomatic basal joint arthritis.

Clinical Significance of Arthroscopic Debridement, Trapeziectomy, and Joint Replacement for Basilar Thumb Joint Arthritis: A Meta-analysis of Pain Score Improvements

Introduction

A meta-analysis was conducted comparing the impact of Arthroscopic debridement (AD), trapeziectomy (TRAP), and joint replacement (JR) on the change in pain scores on patients with Basilar thumb joint arthritis (BTJA).

Methods

Four databases were searched for studies presenting pain outcomes following surgical intervention for BTJA. Pain scores were reported using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and compared against the pre-established threshold for Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of 1.65.

Results

Eighteen studies with 763 patients treated with AD(n=102, 13%), TRAP(n=428, 56%), and JR(n=233, 31%) between 2010 and 2023 with a mean follow-up period of 38 ± 28 months were included. There were 25 groups including 4 AD, 14 TRAP, and 7 JR. The mean difference between pre- and post-operative VAS pain was 4.9 ± 2 for all groups. Meta-analysis demonstrated a mean delta VAS of 3.6 (95%CI 1.79-5.38, for AD, 5.1(95%CI, 4.20-6.02) for TRAP and 6.8(95%CI, 5.93-7.97) for JR. ANOVA showed a significant difference between groups (P=0.016). Post-Hoc testing showed a significant difference between AD and JR (P=0.014). A significant improvement in pain scores, surpassing the MCID threshold, was obtained in all surgical interventions. Change in pain score was 2.6 times MCID for AD, 2.9 times for TRAP, and 3.6 times for JR.

Conclusions

All interventions showed significant improvement in pain. Variability in treatment options and improvement depends on patient selection and surgeon's preference. This data can be used to counsel patients regarding the expected pain relief. However, longevity, and long-term outcomes warrant further study.

Effectiveness of Arthroscopic Debridement, Trapeziectomy, and Joint Replacement for Trapeziometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis of Pre and Postoperative Pain Scores

Trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (TMJO) affects up to 33% of postmenopausal women, leading to pain, reduced mobility, and grip strength, with initial treatments focusing on non-surgical options like injections, orthoses, and exercises before considering surgery. A major challenge in managing TMJO involves selecting the optimal surgical strategy that is customized to individual clinical conditions. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three common surgical interventions for TMJO in relieving pain, including arthroscopic debridement (AD), trapeziectomy (TRAP), and joint replacement (JR). PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were queried according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for studies that presented pain outcomes following intervention for TMJO. Pain scores were reported preoperatively and postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS). Inclusion criteria included studies published in Q1 and Q2 journals and those with a follow-up of > six months. The final selection comprised 18 studies with 763 patients treated with AD (n = 102, 13%), TRAP (n = 428, 56%), and JR (n = 233, 31%) between 2010 and 2023, with a mean follow-up period of 38 ± 28 months. The studies included a total of 24 groups, five of which received AD, 13 of which received TRAP, and six of which received JR. The mean preoperative VAS was 6.7 ± 1.7, and the mean postoperative VAS was 1.7 ± 1.3 for all groups (P < 0.001). The meta-analysis demonstrated a mean preoperative pain score of 5.8 (95% CI, 4.1-7.5) for AD, 6.6 (95% CI, 5.7-7.5) for TRAP, and 7.8 (95% CI, 7.0-8.7) for JR. Postoperatively, there was a mean pain score of 2.2 (95% CI, 0.1-4.2) for AD, 1.4 (95% CI, 1.1-1.7) for TRAP, and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6-1.2) for JR. This study showed that, if appropriately indicated, joint preservation with AD may be as effective as TRAP and JR for reducing pain associated with TMJO in the short term. However, the rate of conversion or revision should be assessed in future studies.

Targeted partial arthroscopic trapeziectomy with temporary distraction: a retrospective study with 5-year follow-up

Targeted partial arthroscopic trapeziectomy with temporary distraction is a minimally invasive treatment for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. We performed a retrospective single centre study from March 2011 to May 2022 and included patients with at least 5 years of follow-up. A failure was defined as a patient requiring a second procedure. Of the 28 patients with at least 5 years of follow-up, 23 were reviewed. Five of the 23 patients underwent revision surgery with a 5-year survival rate of 78%. There was a significant improvement in pain and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) score. There were three postoperative complications, one with complex regional pain syndrome, and two with hyperesthesia in the distribution of the sensory branch of the radial nerve. Targeted partial arthroscopic trapeziectomy with temporary distraction is a feasible temporary solution for early stage trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. However, there remains a 20% risk of failure.Level of evidence: IV.

Targeted Partial Arthroscopic Trapeziectomy and Temporary K-Wire Distraction for Basal Joint Arthritis in Young Patients: A Retrospective Study of 39 Thumbs

Purpose  There is a real need to find less invasive therapeutic options for young patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint. We wanted to assess the effectiveness of targeted partial arthroscopic trapeziectomy with distraction of the trapeziometacarpal (TM) joint with Kirschner wires (K-wires) in 39 thumbs impacted by TM osteoarthritis. Methods  We conducted a retrospective study in which preoperative and postoperative data on pinch strength, grip strength, and pain on a visual analogue scale were collected. Subgroup analysis was performed based on two different K-wire distraction techniques. Only patients suffering from primary osteoarthritis and younger than 70 years were included. Second, we compared the frequency of complications relative to the position of the pins. Results  We found a significant improvement in pain ( p  = 0.005) and grip strength ( p  = 0.0021) as well as an improvement in pinch strength ( p  = 0.5704). There was reduction in pain for all Badia levels, which was significant for stages 2 ( p  = 0.002) and 3 ( p  = 0.032) as well as an overall improvement in grip strength and pinch strength for all Badia levels. Conclusion  Partial trapeziectomy with K-wire distraction in young patients suffering from TM osteoarthritis is a simple technique that requires minimal equipment and yields satisfactory outcomes. Conversion to another surgical treatment is still possible if this less invasive technique is unsuccessful. Level of Evidence  This is a Level IV study.

Targeted Partial Arthroscopic Trapeziectomy and Distraction: Surgical Technique

Basal joint osteoarthritis is a real public health problem, yet there is no consensus on its treatment. Although total trapeziectomy, as well as arthroplasty, provides long-lasting efficacy, it does not seem to be adapted to a young population with complications that are often very difficult to manage. In the era of minimally invasive surgery, there is a real interest in finding conservative therapeutic alternatives for young subjects that allow them to "pass a painful milestone" and, thus, postpone the least conservative interventions. This article details the surgical technique of an arthroscopic and conservative technique: The Targeted Partial Arthroscopic Trapeziectomy and Distraction based on two goals: targeted resection of painful arthritic lesions and distraction of the joint to restore ligament tension and hopefully regrow fibrocartilage on resected lesions.

Treatment of First Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis with Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review

Background First carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis or trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis is a common debilitating hand condition. No one surgical technique has demonstrated superiority in managing this disease. Purpose This study performed a systematic review of arthroscopic techniques for treating first CMC arthritis to assess the effectiveness of different arthroscopic techniques. Methods Grip strength, pinch strength, visual analog scale, the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, range of motion (ROM), and complications were recorded. Two subgroup analyses were performed, comparing outcomes of (1) trapeziectomy of any type versus debridement alone and (2) trapeziectomy alone versus interposition versus suspension techniques. Results Preoperative and postoperative scores significantly improved for DASH scores and pain at rest and with activity with variable improvements in ROM. Complications occurred in 13% of cases in publications that reported complications. When comparing studies that utilized techniques with any type of trapeziectomy to debridement alone, only the trapeziectomy subgroup showed significant improvements in pain. When comparing trapeziectomy alone to interposition and suspension techniques, mean DASH scores and pain levels significantly improved in interposition and suspension subgroups. Conclusions The existing literature describes a predominantly female population with Eaton-Littler stage II and III disease. In the subgroup analysis, arthroscopic techniques involving a trapeziectomy seem to be more effective at lowering pain scores compared to techniques involving debridement alone. Likewise, interposition and suspension techniques may show improved outcomes compared to techniques involving trapeziectomy alone. Level of evidence This is a Level III study.

Arthroscopic Management of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Arthritis and Pathology

Basilar thumb arthritis is a debilitating condition characterized by pain, reduced joint stability, and reduced capacity for daily activities. Various arthroscopic approaches have been described based on patient factors, as well as radiographic and arthroscopic staging criteria. Here we provide an overview of arthroscopic management of basilar thumb arthritis, including patient evaluation, surgical techniques, outcomes, and new developments. We describe our preferred approach for Eaton stage I-III disease, consisting of arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy with suture button suspensionplasty. This technique is safe, reliable, and allows for early range of motion and quicker recovery while minimizing scarring and reducing the risk of nerve injury.

Joint Preserving Treatments for Thumb CMC Arthritis

Trapezium resection with or without tendon suspension arthroplasty has been considered the gold standard surgical treatment for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (CMCJ OA). However, the removal of the trapezium may result in subsidence or shortening of the first metacarpal axis. Resection may also lead to reduced pinch strength and thumb instability. Joint preservation techniques may be used in early stages of CMCJ OA to promote pain relief, return to function, and delay more invasive procedures such as a trapezium resection.

Trapeziectomy with suture-button suspensionplasty versus ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition: a randomized controlled trial

The purpose of the present study was to compare the results of patients operated with trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) using flexor carpi radialis tendon versus trapeziectomy followed by suspension of the first metacarpal to the second metacarpal using a Mini TightRope® suture button (suture button suspension: SBS). A single-center prospective randomized controlled trial was performed, comparing 37 patients with SBS and 39 with LRTI. All surgeries were performed by the same fellowship-trained hand surgeon. Patients were assessed by an independent observer at 40 months' follow-up. Pre- and postoperative strength, trapezial space ratio (TSR), range of motion, QuickDASH and visual analogue pain score were recorded. Both procedures improved functional parameters of pain, key strength, tip strength and grip strength while maintaining range of motion, without significant differences. In the SBS group, TSR decreased by 17%, compared to 28% in the LRTI group. The mean operative time was shorter in SBS (63 vs 91 minutes; p < 0.0001), as was immobilization time (2 vs 6 weeks; p < 0.0001), and patients resumed normal activity sooner (10 vs 12 week; p = 0.0138) and required less physical therapy (19.3 vs 13.1 weeks; p < 0.0001). We believe that our results are related to the hypothesis suggested by biomechanical studies that revealed better initial load bearing profile and maintenance of trapezial space following serial loading in cadaver models.

Targeted treatment for osteoarthritis: drugs and delivery system

The management of osteoarthritis (OA) is a clinical challenge due to the particular avascular, dense, and occluded tissue structure. Despite numerous clinical reports and animal studies, the pathogenesis and progression of OA are still not fully understood. On the basis of traditional drugs, a large number of new drugs have been continuously developed. Intra-articular (IA) administration for OA hastens the development of targeted drug delivery systems (DDS). OA drugs modification and the synthesis of bioadaptive carriers contribute to a qualitative leap in the efficacy of IA treatment. Nanoparticles (NPs) are demonstrated credible improvement of drug penetration and retention in OA. Targeted nanomaterial delivery systems show the prominent biocompatibility and drug loading-release ability. This article reviews different drugs and nanomaterial delivery systems for IA treatment of OA, in an attempt to resolve the inconsonance between in vitro and in vivo release, and explore more interactions between drugs and nanocarriers, so as to open up new horizons for the treatment of OA.

Basal joint arthroscopy indications in first CMC joint arthritis

Basal joint arthroscopy is one of the more recent evolutions of small joint arthroscopy in upper limb surgery. Conventional arthroscopy equipment is generally sufficient to perform these procedures without any specific adaptation. Arthroscopic exploration of the trapeziometacarpal joint is performed through 1R, 1U portals with the addition of a thenar portal in some indications. In the context of basal joint arthritis, we can distinguish diagnostic, preventive and therapeutic indications for arthroscopy. Diagnostic indications are the assessment of painful post-traumatic basal joint lesions of cartilage and ligaments, and the evaluation of chondromalacia and ligament attenuation to help classify basal joint osteoarthritis to provide additional clinical information, which can influence further treatment depending on the stage of the disease. Preventive indications are reduction of Bennett's fracture, basal joint dislocation management to avoid post-traumatic instability and chondromalacia; it can also be indicated after decompensation of hyperlaxity. Therapeutic indications are debridement, ligament augmentation procedures or shrinkage ± interposition ± partial or total trapeziectomy, ligamentoplasty, etc. Basal joint arthroscopy appears to be the seat of advances in arthroscopic procedures with clinical results at least as effective as classical open surgery, but this technique still requires long-term evaluation.

Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: Arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy using the Thenar Portal

BACKGROUND

Although the standard 1Radial and 1Ulnar portals allow for visualisation of most of the trapezium articular surface, the proximity of these two portals can often make arthroscopic triangulation and visualisation of the most lateral capsule and joint surface challenging. Despite its already reported advantages in improving visualisation, there is little literature reporting the clinical experience with the Thenar Portal. The purpose of this study is to describe potential complications and the short-term clinical-radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy using the Thenar Portal in order to determine its safety and efficacy as a standard working portal.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients diagnosed with first carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis who were treated surgically with an arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy. Only patients with stage II or III osteoarthritis and a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. Twenty-two patients (24 thumbs) with an average age of 62 years met the inclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 52 months. Intra-operative and post-surgical complications were recorded. Objective evaluation consisted of an assessment of range of motion (ROM), grip and pinch strength. Subjective evaluation consisted of a DASH questionnaire and the visual analog scale to score pain at rest, during activities, and function.

RESULTS

There were no intra- or post-surgical complications. In one case, pain persisted with a poor functional result, requiring a revision surgery. Average range of motion (compared with the contralateral) showed a statistically significant improvement in palmar abduction and radial abduction of the CMC joint: 50° vs. 55° (p=0.01235), and 50° vs. 55° (p=0.06009), respectively. There was no statistically significant improvement in thumb adduction, grip strength, or lateral and tip-pinch. All patients achieved retropulsion with their affected thumb. According to the VAS, average rest pain improved from 7.5 to 0 (p<0.001) and from 9 to 0 (p<0.001) during activity. The average final function and QuickDASH were 9 (VAS) and 8, respectively (p<0.001). The average radiographic proximal migration of the first metacarpal was 2.9mm (range: 0.7-5.8mm).

DISCUSSION

Arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy using the Thenar portal: 1) improved visualisation of the trapeziometacarpal joint, 2) facilitated arthroscopic triangulation, and 3) represents a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of thumb osteoarthritis, with pain relief and function improvement in most patients without a higher risk of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Comparison of Postoperative Occupational Therapy and Narcotic Use in Two Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty Approaches

BACKGROUND

The authors sought to determine whether differences exist in (1) the number of postoperative occupational therapy visits and (2) narcotic use in two carpometacarpal arthroplasty groups.

METHODS

A retrospective study comparing patients undergoing abductor pollicis longus (APL) suspensionplasty (154 patients) or flexor carpi radialis ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (FCR LRTI) techniques (40 patients) between January 1, 2012, and August 1, 2018, was performed. Data included demographics, procedure performed, complications, number of postoperative occupational therapy visits, and postoperative morphine equivalent dosage used. Statistical testing used the chi-square test for proportions and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for nonnormal data. The significance level was 0.05.

RESULTS

The APL suspensionplasty and FCR LRTI groups had similar ages (58.1 ± 7.8 years versus 58.1 ± 7.7 years), sex ratios (73 percent female versus 75 percent female), and preoperative narcotic user proportions (1 percent versus 3 percent). Complication rates following the procedures were similar (21 percent and 18 percent, respectively). The number of postoperative occupational therapy visits following APL suspensionplasty (median, 0; interquartile range, 0 to 4) and FCR LRTI (median, 0; interquartile range, 0 to 4) were not significantly different (p = 0.961). There was less use of narcotics following APL suspensionplasty (median, 375 morphine equivalent dosage; interquartile range, 241.9 to 525 morphine equivalent dosage) compared with FCR LRTI (median, 462.5 morphine equivalent dosage; interquartile range, 375 to 768.8 morphine equivalent dosage), and this difference was significant (p = 0.0007).

CONCLUSIONS

The APL suspensionplasty technique had less narcotic use and similar complication rates and occupational therapy visits compared to FCR LRTI. Prospective studies comparing postoperative pain control and function with these two carpometacarpal arthroplasty techniques may be beneficial.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Anatomic Reconstruction of the Anterior Oblique and the Dorsoradial Ligaments for Painful Subluxating Carpometacarpal Joint of the Thumb

Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC OA) is a common pathology of the hand that is characterized by pain, loss of grip and pinch strength, and deformity. Although conservative management is often preferred in earlier stage of CMC OA, surgical techniques can be used when symptoms are not fully relieved, especially with subluxation. We report a case series of 26 patients (32 operations) with Eaton stage I and II CMC OA who underwent a novel surgical technique that anatomically restores the CMC joint with autologous double ligament reconstruction. All cases were retrospectively reviewed as a prospective study and performed at a single regional health system from 2012 to 2016. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs, grip and pinch strength measurements, and DASH scores were collected to evaluate the outcomes. The mean CMC subluxation ratio decreased from 0.59±0.14 to 0.35±0.21 (P<0.0001). The mean grip strength increased from 44.34±17.36 pounds to 52.97±18.92 pounds (P=0.017), and the mean pinch strength increased from 10.16±4.59 pounds to 12.75±4.52 pounds (P=0.00027). The mean DASH scores decreased from 42.32±14.99 to 19.94±14.47 (P<0.0001). The average follow-up period was 39.44±14.94 months. Three patients had postoperative thumb stiffness that resolved with physical therapy. One patient had postoperative pain, attributed to carpal tunnel syndrome. One surgery required revision. All other patients (84.38%) reported significant improvement in pain and the ability to return to previous levels of work. This surgical technique is therefore a feasible option for patients with Eaton stage I or II CMC OA, and should be recommended for wider surgical use.

Dry Wrist Arthroscopy for Radial-Sided Wrist Disorders

The development of wrist arthroscopy has been useful in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of both ligament and osseous injuries. As the treatment indications and techniques become more refined, this article explores the role of dry arthroscopy to treat radial-sided disorders of the wrist.

Arthroscopic treatment of basal joint arthritis by partial trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction: Short-term results from a prospective study of 20 patients

Partial trapeziectomy for basal joint arthritis is an alternative to total trapeziectomy that preserves the height of the thumb column. Using arthroscopy reduces the incidence of periarticular lesions and the risks of complications. The purpose of this prospective single-center study was to evaluate the results of arthroscopic partial trapeziectomy combined with suspension and interposition ligament reconstruction using half of the abductor pollicis longus tendon. Twenty patients (18 women, 2 men) with a mean age of 55 years (43-65 years) were operated using this technique between November 2013 to February 2015. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery. The 20 patients were reviewed after 12 months. The subjective QuickDASH score improved from the 3rd post-operative month (P = 0.0029) from 50.6 preoperatively to 30.3 after 3 months, 17.6 after 6 months and 9.6 after 12 months. Pain was reduced in the 1st month post-operative (P < 0.0001). The Kapandji Score and pinch strength improved from the 3rd month (P = 0.034). Return to work was possible for 19% of employed patients after 1 month, 44% after 3 months and 87.5% after 6 and 12 months. Eighty-eight percent of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied after 3 months and 95% after 6 and 12 months. Pain levels, range of motion and QuickDASH Score are similar to those of open partial trapeziectomy described in the literature. However, recovery seems to be faster with this arthroscopic technique. Arthroscopic treatment of basal joint arthritis, which limits capsule and ligament lesions, leads to good short- and medium-term results in terms of pain relief and thumb motion while preserving strength. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 (Prospective, non-randomized).

A systematic review and meta-analysis of arthroscopic assisted techniques for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis

Arthroscopic management of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthrosis (OA) is an approach that has unclear results. We performed a systematic review encompassing three electronic databases up to May 2016 for studies describing arthroscopic-assisted techniques for thumb CMC OA. Meta-analyses of visual analogue scores (VAS) for pain, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, grip strength and pinch strength before and after arthroscopy were performed for ten included non-randomized cohort studies comprising 294 patients. Based on Hedges' g measure, we found a large effect on VAS and DASH scores, a small effect on grip strength and no effect on pinch strength. On average, VAS improved by 4.1 cm, DASH by 22 points and grip strength by 2.8 kg. Complications were reported in 4% of patients. The use of arthroscopic-assisted techniques for thumb CMC OA is still limited; however, it may be a reasonable option for patients with thumb CMC OA who do not respond to non-operative treatment.

The Incidence of Arthroplasty After Initial Arthroscopy for Trapeziometacarpal Arthrosis

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear how many patients undergo secondary surgery after initial arthroscopy for trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthrosis. We studied the factors related to secondary TMC arthroplasty after TMC arthroscopy. We also examined secondary questions of: (1) what percentage of patients underwent secondary TMC arthroplasty; and (2) how much time elapsed from initial arthroscopy to arthroplasty.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included all adult patients who were treated with arthroscopy of the TMC joint at 2 level I hospitals and affiliates. Factors were assessed for their independent association with secondary TMC arthroplasty using bivariate and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 84 (17%) thumbs underwent secondary TMC arthroplasty an average of 11 months after the initial arthroscopy. Synovectomy alone and smoking tobacco were independently associated with secondary TMC arthroplasty when compared with arthroscopic (partial) trapeziectomy with additional tendon interposition or allograft.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that 1 in 6 thumbs underwent secondary TMC arthroplasty, an average of 11 months after the initial arthroscopy. Coupling arthroscopy with partial trapeziectomy, interposition, or extension osteotomy may be a preferable strategy to isolated synovectomy. In addition, smoking tobacco is associated with inferior outcomes regardless of surgical procedure.

Survival and Long-Term Outcomes of Thumb Metacarpal Extension Osteotomy for Symptomatic Carpometacarpal Laxity and Early Basal Joint Arthritis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the survival and long-term outcomes of thumb metacarpal extension osteotomy for early carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a thumb extension osteotomy between years 2000 and 2011 were identified. Patient demographics, complications, and reoperations were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used with subsequent CMC surgery defined as failure. Patients who had undergone surgery 10 years or more before the study date underwent radiographic assessment, grip and pinch strength testing, and completed the Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires.

RESULTS

Thirty-two procedures in 7 males and 21 females were performed (mean age, 44.8 y). There were no cases of nonunion. Nine of 32 thumbs developed pin site erythema and were treated with oral antibiotics. Two thumbs developed osteomyelitis. Seven of 32 thumbs (22%) required reoperation. The Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated a 70% probability that patients who have this procedure will not require additional CMC surgery up to 14 years. Seven patients with a mean follow-up of 12.3 years (minimum 10 y) returned for clinical evaluation. The mean PRWHE and QuickDASH scores were 32.1 and 27.7, respectively. Examination revealed 124% pinch and 98% grip strength relative to the preoperative values. One thumb did not progress from stage II disease; 2 thumbs progressed from stage I to stage II; 1 thumb progressed from stage II to stage III; 1 thumb progressed from stage II to stage IV; 1 thumb did not have disease progression at the CMC joint, but developed scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal arthritis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although reoperation rates and superficial infections with the described method of fixation were relatively high, thumb metacarpal osteotomy provides some degree of pain relief and improvement of function. This procedure may have utility as a temporizing measure in younger patients as it does not compromise future reconstructive procedures.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Arthroscopic synovectomy for the treatment of stage II to IV trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis

Objective: As a minimal invasive surgery for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint (trapeziometacarpal [TMC]) arthritis, we performed an arthroscopic synovectomy for Eaton stage II to IV arthritis.

Patients and Methods: We included patients who were effectively treated with a corticosteroid injection, experienced recurrence of TMC pain, and had no major instability of the TMC. Surgery was performed in 17 female patients. Synovectomy was performed, when possible, using radiofrequency and a shaver. The mean follow-up period was 27.2 months.

Results: Two patients required additional surgery; however, 15 patients were satisfied with the outcome. The mean visual analogue scale score improved from 8.8 preoperatively to 2.2 postoperatively.

Conclusion: Arthroscopic synovectomy is indicated to be an effective treatment for stage II to IV TMC arthritis. The goal of this treatment was to relieve severe pain minimally invasively. Furthermore, if symptoms remain or reoccur, another curative procedure can be chosen.

Arthroscopic Synovectomy Combined with Autologous Fat Grafting in Early Stages of CMC Osteoarthritis of the Thumb

Background  Minimal invasive treatments such as arthroscopic techniques may be adequate to restore the anatomy and functional integrity of the thumb CMC (carpometacarpal) joint. In this paper, we reported the interposition of autologous fat tissue in combination with arthroscopic synovectomy/debridement for early stage of the thumb CMC joint osteoarthritis. Patients and Methods  Twelve patients with a mean age of 46 years with early radiological stages of thumb CMC joint osteoarthritis were included. Evaluation of outcome was measured prior and 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery including, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), QuickDASH, grip and pinch strength, range of motion (ROM), and patient satisfaction. Results  Pain at rest (or with load) was reduced from preoperative 4,7 (8,7) to 2 (5,9) at 3 to 6 months; 1,4 (4,3) at 12 months; and 0,75 (2,7) at 2 years after the surgery. Initial preoperative QuickDASH value of 52 points reduced to 33 (17-65) at 6 months, 23 (2-70) at 12 months, and 20 (11-29) at 24 months after the surgery. Grip strength and thumb pinch with respect to the contralateral untreated thumb was reduced in the first 12 months but recovered subsequently. ROM was equal to the contralateral thumb. Three patients suffered from tendinitis and required surgical treatment. One patient indicated prolonged pain symptoms. No infections were noted and no donor-site morbidity or side effects were detected. Conclusion  Arthroscopic synovectomy combined with autologous fat graft is a reliable surgical option for early thumb CMC joint osteoarthritis and that effect continues for more than 24 months.

Arthroscopic Management of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Arthritis

The thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ1) is born to have good freedom of motion. However, the excellent mobility at this joint also predisposes attenuation of capsuloligamentous structures, joint incongruity, instability, and osteoarthritis. The prevalence of radiographic CMCJ1 arthritis is high. There is no single ideal surgery for all stages of CMCJ1 arthritis, and for all kinds of patients. The arthroscopic approach seems to provide a better alternative with rewarding preliminary results. It includes arthroscopic synovectomy/debridement/thermal shrinkage, arthroscopic partial trapeziectomy and suture button suspensionplasty, and arthroscopic CMCJ1 excision/suture button suspensionplasty/K-wire fixation.

Functional Outcomes of Thumb Trapeziometacarpal Arthrodesis With a Locked Plate Versus Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition

PURPOSE

To compare standardized functional and patient-reported early outcomes following trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis (TMA) using a locking cage plate construct with trapezial excision, ligament reconstruction, and tendon interposition (LRTI).

METHODS

This prospective cohort enrolled 50 consecutive patients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis undergoing TMA or LRTI. Demographic data, objective measurements, Sollerman function testing, and patient-reported outcomes were collected before surgery and at various time intervals up to 12 months after surgery. The study was powered to detect a minimally clinically important difference on the Michigan Hand Questionnaire between groups at 12 months. To account for selection bias, we performed between-group statistical analysis of the magnitude of change from preoperative to postoperative data. All complications were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the amount of change in grip or pinch strength, patient-reported outcomes, or functional hand testing between TMA and LRTI. The TMA group had significantly increased thumb tip opposition distance. The TMA group was complicated by a 26% overall nonunion rate of which 8% were symptomatic. The LRTI group (Wagner incision) had a significantly increased incidence of superficial branch of the radial nerve paresthesia. The incidence of complications was similar between operative groups, but revision surgery was more common after TMA.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with LRTI, TMA failed to demonstrate superior improvement in strength, standardized functional performance, or patient-reported function and is associated with an increased likelihood of revision surgery in the first 12 months. Trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis with a locking plate and screw construct does not ensure union, although most radiographic nonunions were asymptomatic. Wagner incisions are associated with a significantly increased incidence of superficial branch of the radial nerve paresthesia compared with dorsal trapeziometacarpal exposure.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

WITHDRAWN: Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is used to treat persistent pain and dysfunction at the base of the thumb when conservative management, such as splinting, or medical management, such as oral analgesics, is no longer adequate in reducing disability and pain. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2005.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different surgical techniques for trapeziometacarpal (thumb) osteoarthritis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following sources up to 08 August 2013: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1950 to August 2013), EMBASE (1974 to August 2013), CINAHL (1982 to August 2013), Clinicaltrials.gov (to August 2013) and World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Trials Portal (to August 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs where the intervention was surgery for people with thumb osteoarthritis. Outcomes were pain, physical function, quality of life, patient global assessment, adverse events, treatment failure or trapeziometacarpal joint imaging.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration. Two review authors independently screened and included studies according to the inclusion criteria, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data, including adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 studies with 670 participants. Seven surgical procedures were identified (trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI), trapeziectomy, trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction, trapeziectomy with interpositional arthroplasty (IA), Artelon joint resurfacing, arthrodesis and Swanson joint replacement). We did not find any studies that compared surgery with sham surgery or surgery with non-surgical interventions.Most included studies had an unclear risk of most biases which raises doubt about the results. No procedure demonstrated any superiority over another in terms of pain, physical function, quality of life, patient global assessment, adverse events, treatment failure (re-operation) or trapeziometacarpal joint imaging. One study demonstrated a difference in adverse events (mild-moderate swelling) between Artelon joint replacement and trapeziectomy with tendon interposition. However, the quality of evidence was very low due to a high risk of bias and imprecision of results.Low quality evidence suggests trapeziectomy with LRTI may not provide additional benefits or result in more adverse events over trapeziectomy alone. Mean pain (three studies, 162 participants) was 26 mm on a 0 to 100 mm VAS (0 is no pain) for trapeziectomy alone, trapeziectomy with LRTI reduced pain by a mean of 2.8 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -9.8 to 4.2) or an absolute reduction of 3% (-10% to 4%). Mean physical function (three studies, 211 participants) was 31.1 points on a 0 to 100 point scale (0 is best physical function, or no disability) with trapeziectomy alone, trapeziectomy with LRTI resulted in sightly lower function scores (standardised mean difference 0.1, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.32), an equivalent to a worsening of 0.2 points (95% CI -5.8 to 6.1) on a 0 to 100 point scale (absolute decrease in function 0.03% (-0.83% to 0.88%)). Low quality evidence from four studies (328 participants) indicates that the mean number of adverse events was 10 per 100 participants for trapeziectomy alone, and 19 events per 100 participants for trapeziectomy with LRTI (RR 1.89, 95% CI 0.96 to 3.73) or an absolute risk increase of 9% (95% CI 0% to 28%). Low quality evidence from one study (42 participants) indicates that the mean scapho-metacarpal distance was 2.3 mm for the trapeziectomy alone group, trapeziectomy with LRTI resulted in a mean of 0.1 mm less distance (95% CI -0.81 to 0.61). None of the included trials reported global assessment, quality of life, and revision or re-operation rates.Low-quality evidence from two small studies (51 participants) indicated that trapeziectomy with LRTI may not improve function or slow joint degeneration, or produce additional adverse events over trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction.We are uncertain of the benefits or harms of other surgical techniques due to the mostly low quality evidence from single studies and the low reporting rates of key outcomes. There was insufficient evidence to assess if trapeziectomy with LRTI had additional benefit over arthrodesis or trapeziectomy with IA. There was also insufficient evidence to assess if trapeziectomy with IA had any additional benefit over the Artelon joint implant, the Swanson joint replacement or trapeziectomy alone.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not identify any studies that compared surgery to sham surgery or to non-operative treatments. We were unable to demonstrate that any technique confers a benefit over another technique in terms of pain and physical function. Furthermore, the included studies were not of high enough quality to provide conclusive evidence that the compared techniques provided equivalent outcomes.

Locking Plate Arthrodesis Compares Favorably with LRTI for Thumb Trapeziometacarpal Arthrosis: Early Outcomes from a Longitudinal Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis (TMA) has been complicated by nonunion and hardware failure.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We hypothesized that modification of the TMA technique with a locking cage plate construct would afford reliable bony union while producing greater hand function than trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) at early follow-up.

METHODS

We enrolled 36 consecutive patients with trapeziometacapal osteoarthritis (14 TMA patients (15 thumbs), 22 LRTI patients (22 thumbs)). The study was powered to detect a minimal clinically important difference on the QuickDASH questionnaire between groups. Secondary outcomes included Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ), VAS-pain, and EQ-5D-3L scores. Patients were examined to evaluate thumb motion and strength. TMA patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically for union.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 15.6 months, and the mean age was 59.2 years. Union was achieved in 14/15 (93%) of TMA thumbs. Improvement in QuickDASH scores was similar after TMA and LRTI (49 to 28 and 50 to 18, respectively). Postoperative patient-rated upper extremity function, health status, and pain were similar between groups. Pinch strength was significantly greater after TMA (5.9 vs 4.7 kg). No differences in thumb or wrist range of motion were observed postoperatively with the exception of greater total metacarpophalangeal joint motion after TMA. Complications after TMA included nonunion (7%), development of symptomatic scaphotrapezotrapezoidal (STT) arthrosis (7%), symptomatic hardware (7%), and superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) paresthesia (7%). Complications after LRTI included subsidence (5%), MP hyperextension deformity (5%), and SBRN paresthesias (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

At early follow-up, patient-rated function was similar among patients undergoing TMA and LRTI. TMA produced 25% greater pinch strength compared with LRTI. Despite historical concerns regarding global loss of ROM with arthrodesis, motion was similar between groups. Our observed TMA nonunion rate of 7% is low relative to historically reported nonunion rates (7-16%). Locking cage plate technology affords rigid fixation for TMA with promising early results noting reliable bony union while minimizing complications.

Arthroscopic partial trapeziectomy and tendon interposition for thumb carpometacarpal arthritis

Background

The purpose of this study was to introduce arthroscopic partial trapeziectomy and tendon interposition for the treatment of symptomatic thumb carpometacarpal arthritis of Eaton stage II or III.

Methods

From August 2001 to April 2009, 23 patients with thumb carpometacarpal arthritis were treated using this technique. Pain score, range of motion, and pinch strength were clinically evaluated and compared with the preoperative values after a minimum follow-up duration of 24 months.

Results

Significant reduction in pain score and increases in range of motion and pinch strength were found (all p < 0.001) after a 2-year follow-up. The mean ± SD (median) postoperative pain score was 1.0 ± 0.7 (1.0) at rest and 1.3 ± 0.9 (1.0) during daily activities. The postoperative range of motion was 19.1° ± 4.2° (20°) for extension and 35.7° ± 7.1° (35.0°) for flexion, and the postoperative pinch strength was 86.5 % ± 19.9 % (90.0 %). No complications were observed in our patient series.

Conclusions

Arthroscopic partial trapeziectomy and soft tissue interposition could be an alternative treatment method for patients with symptomatic thumb carpometacarpal arthritis of Eaton stage II or III.

Usefulness and complications associated with thenar and standard portals during arthroscopic surgery of thumb carpometacarpal joint

PURPOSE

Advances in small arthroscopy have enabled a minimally invasive surgery for thumb carpometacarpal joints. However, surgery is often difficult using standard CM-radial (CM-R) and CM-ulnar portals (CM-U). Here, we describe the clinical applications and complications associated with using thenar portal (TP) and standard portals.

METHODS

Arthroscopic surgeries of thumb carpometacarpal joint were performed in 21 patients including 15 patients with osteoarthritis and six Bennett's fracture-dislocations. Complications and the frequency of use associated with each portal were evaluated.

RESULTS

Complications associated with the CM-R portal comprised paresthesia due to damage of the radial nerve branches in two patients. No nerves were damaged but the operation scar became tender at the TP in three patients. The CM-R was used at a lower frequency when the TP was utilized.

CONCLUSION

The clinical use of TP may decrease the risk of radial sensory nerve damage through decreasing frequency of use of the CM-R that is located near the nerve.

LEVEL OF STUDY

IV.

Long-Term Outcome of Arthroscopic Resection Arthroplasty With or Without Interposition for Thumb Basal Joint Arthritis

PURPOSE

To report results on 144 cases following arthroscopic resection arthroplasty (ARA) with or without interposition for basal joint arthritis.

METHODS

Cases undergoing ARA for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis between 2004 and 2011 were prospectively enrolled (n = 178). Data were collected before surgery and after surgery at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Patients were excluded for less than 1-year follow-up or concomitant procedures that interfered with evaluation of the variable of interest (interposition). Human acellular dermal matrix (GRAFTJACKET) was the most commonly used interposition. Outcomes on 19 cases of interposition using collagen bioimplant (OrthADAPT) and porous polyurethaneurea (Artelon) scaffolds were also reported. Comparative analyses were performed on 52 patients with GRAFTJACKET interposition and on 73 without. Mean follow-up was 7.4 and 5.6 years with and without interposition, respectively. Descriptive statistics were evaluated on all baseline variables. Raw change scores of grip, pinch, and pain outcomes were evaluated. Confounding variables at a significance level of P less than .05 were adjusted for in linear mixed models, and an analysis of covariance was employed through an unstructured type of variance-covariance matrix.

RESULTS

Change scores from baseline to 1 year for the interposition group for pain (numerical rating scale, 0-10), pinch, and grip was -5.8, 3.3, and 7, respectively, and -5.1, 2.1, and 9 for the noninterposition group. Postoperative mean satisfaction was 4.7 and 4.4 for the with- and without-interposition groups, respectively. There were 4 failures with and 2 without interposition. Artelon and OrthADAPT did poorly with unacceptably high failure rates.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that interposition is not necessary following ARA for thumb basal joint arthritis. Because arthroscopic interposition of material contributes to health care costs in terms of patient and facility costs without clear benefit to the patient, routine use of expensive interposition products should be abandoned or carefully evaluated with a prospective randomized controlled trial.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is used to treat persistent pain and dysfunction at the base of the thumb when conservative management, such as splinting, or medical management, such as oral analgesics, is no longer adequate in reducing disability and pain. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2005.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different surgical techniques for trapeziometacarpal (thumb) osteoarthritis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following sources up to 08 August 2013: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1950 to August 2013), EMBASE (1974 to August 2013), CINAHL (1982 to August 2013), Clinicaltrials.gov (to August 2013) and World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Trials Portal (to August 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs where the intervention was surgery for people with thumb osteoarthritis. Outcomes were pain, physical function, quality of life, patient global assessment, adverse events, treatment failure or trapeziometacarpal joint imaging. We excluded trials that compared non-surgical interventions with surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration. Two review authors independently screened and included studies according to the inclusion criteria, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data, including adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 studies with 670 participants. Seven surgical procedures were identified (trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI), trapeziectomy, trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction, trapeziectomy with interpositional arthroplasty (IA), Artelon joint resurfacing, arthrodesis and Swanson joint replacement).Most included studies had an unclear risk of most biases which raises doubt about the results. No procedure demonstrated any superiority over another in terms of pain, physical function, quality of life, patient global assessment, adverse events, treatment failure (re-operation) or trapeziometacarpal joint imaging. One study demonstrated a difference in adverse events (mild-moderate swelling) between Artelon joint replacement and trapeziectomy with tendon interposition. However, the quality of evidence was very low due to a high risk of bias and imprecision of results.Low quality evidence suggests trapeziectomy with LRTI may not provide additional benefits or result in more adverse events over trapeziectomy alone. Mean pain (three studies, 162 participants) was 26 mm on a 0 to 100 mm VAS (0 is no pain) for trapeziectomy alone, trapeziectomy with LRTI reduced pain by a mean of 2.8 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -9.8 to 4.2) or an absolute reduction of 3% (-10% to 4%). Mean physical function (three studies, 211 participants) was 31.1 points on a 0 to 100 point scale (0 is best physical function, or no disability) with trapeziectomy alone, trapeziectomy with LRTI resulted in sightly lower function scores (standardised mean difference 0.1, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.32), an equivalent to a worsening of 0.2 points (95% CI -5.8 to 6.1) on a 0 to 100 point scale (absolute decrease in function 0.03% (-0.83% to 0.88%)). Low quality evidence from four studies (328 participants) indicates that the mean number of adverse events was 10 per 100 participants for trapeziectomy alone, and 19 events per 100 participants for trapeziectomy with LRTI (RR 1.89, 95% CI 0.96 to 3.73) or an absolute risk increase of 9% (95% CI 0% to 28%). Low quality evidence from one study (42 participants) indicates that the mean scapho-metacarpal distance was 2.3 mm for the trapeziectomy alone group, trapeziectomy with LRTI resulted in a mean of 0.1 mm less distance (95% CI -0.81 to 0.61). None of the included trials reported global assessment, quality of life, and revision or re-operation rates.Low-quality evidence from two small studies (51 participants) indicated that trapeziectomy with LRTI may not improve function or slow joint degeneration, or produce additional adverse events over trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction.We are uncertain of the benefits or harms of other surgical techniques due to the mostly low quality evidence from single studies and the low reporting rates of key outcomes. There was insufficient evidence to assess if trapeziectomy with LRTI had additional benefit over arthrodesis or trapeziectomy with IA. There was also insufficient evidence to assess if trapeziectomy with IA had any additional benefit over the Artelon joint implant, the Swanson joint replacement or trapeziectomy alone.We did not find any studies that compared any other combination of the other techniques mentioned above or any other techniques including a sham procedure.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not identify any studies that compared surgery to sham surgery and we excluded studies that compared surgery to non-operative treatments. We were unable to demonstrate that any technique confers a benefit over another technique in terms of pain and physical function. Furthermore, the included studies were not of high enough quality to provide conclusive evidence that the compared techniques provided equivalent outcomes.

A scoping review of disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores for hand and wrist conditions

PURPOSE

To evaluate the variability of reported baseline Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores for non-acute hand and wrist conditions. We hypothesized that DASH scores for evaluation of hand and wrist pathology would provide a map of scores that would correspond to severity. In addition to providing a catalog of DASH scores for various upper extremity pathologies, we hypothesized that this review would support the validity of the DASH instrument.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using 3 databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from the earliest available date through January 1, 2013. Search terms included "DASH" and "hand" and combinations of conditions found in the initial search. The search was restricted to studies with baseline DASH scores and DASH scores for isolated conditions, and written in the English language.

RESULTS

Our search identified 1,770 citations; 136 full-text articles were reviewed and 85 studies were included in the scoping review. This provided 100 DASH scores mapped for 24 different diagnoses. Most articles (67%) included chronic conditions for inflammatory or degenerative pathologies rather than posttraumatic disorders. Posttraumatic DASH score reporting ranged from 4 months to 11 years after injury, and final outcome scores varied among studies assessing the same pathology. The greatest variation and highest scores were for de Quervain tendinitis (range, 29-93) and scapholunate advance collapse (range, 17-89). These scores indicated higher disability in de Quervain tendinitis and wrist osteoarthritis compared with conditions such as thumb amputation and upper extremity replantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial variation in the DASH scores and methodology was found and indicates a need for further study of the DASH to allow for standardized interpretation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Does arthroscopic débridement with or without interposition material address carpometacarpal arthritis?

BACKGROUND

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthritis is a common problem in clinical practice with a variety of treatment options. Arthroscopic procedures can preserve all or part of the trapezium in the setting of treatment of basilar joint arthritis, and such procedures (even without stabilization or ligament reconstruction) have high reported success rates. However, little is documented about the limitations of these procedures in terms of patient selection, the optimal type of interposition, if any, and rehabilitation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

A systematic review was performed to determine the influence of (1) interposition material (manufactured, biological, or none); and (2) patient-related factors (including metacarpophalangeal joint hyperextension, ligamentous laxity, and severity of arthritis) on pain, functional scores, and postoperative complications unique to each approach.

METHODS

A systematic review of the English language literature regarding thumb basilar joint arthritis and arthroscopic partial trapeziectomy or débridement was performed. Those procedures including ligament reconstruction or stabilization were excluded.

RESULTS

Biological materials and no interposition were both associated with satisfactory improvement and low rates of complications; complication rates with synthetic materials were higher. Eaton Stages I to III were treated successfully with this technique. The effect of scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) changes was variably described across series. In most series, metacarpophalangeal hyperextension did not seem to have an adverse effect on outcomes, although these patients were excluded in some series.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic débridement with or without interposition can be used for treatment of Eaton Stages I to III CMC osteoarthritis with satisfactory outcomes. Some series suggest satisfactory outcomes in the setting of STT changes and metacarpophalangeal hyperextension.

The role of arthroscopy in trapeziometacarpal arthritis

BACKGROUND

Trapeziometacarpal (TM) arthroscopy should be viewed as a useful minimally invasive adjunctive technique rather than the operation itself since it allows one to visualize the joint surface under high-power magnification with minimal disruption of the important ligamentous complex. Relatively few articles describe the arthroscopic treatment of TM osteoarthritis (OA) and the arthroscopic anatomy of the TM joint. There is lingering confusion as to whether soft tissue interposition and K-wire fixation of the joint are needed and whether the outcomes of arthroscopic procedures compare to the more standard open techniques for TM arthroplasty.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

This paper describes (1) the arthroscopic ligamentous anatomy of the TM joint, (2) the portal anatomy and methodology behind TM arthroscopy, and (3) the arthroscopic treatment for TM OA, including the current clinical indications for TM arthroscopy and the expected outcomes from the literature.

METHODS

A MEDLINE(®) search was used to retrieve papers using the search terms trapeziometacarpal, carpometacarpal, portal anatomy, arthroscopy portals, arthroscopy, arthroscopic, resection arthroplasty, and arthroscopic resection arthroplasty. Eighteen citations satisfied the search terms and were summarized.

RESULTS

Careful wound spread technique is needed to prevent iatrogenic injury to the surrounding superficial radial nerve branches. Traction is essential to prevent chondral injury. Fluoroscopy should be used to help locate portals as necessary. Cadaver training is desirable before embarking on a clinical case. Questions regarding the use of temporary K-wire fixation or thermal shrinkage or the need for a natural or synthetic interposition substance cannot be answered at this time.

CONCLUSIONS

Longitudinal prospective studies are needed to answer these lingering questions. An intimate knowledge of the portal and arthroscopic anatomy is needed to perform TM arthroscopy. Minimally invasive techniques for resection arthroplasty in TM OA with and without soft tissue interposition can yield good outcomes in the treatment of TM OA.

First metacarpal resurfacing with polyvinyl alcohol implant in osteoarthritis: preliminary study

Osteoarthritis of first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is a condition that is frequently encountered in hand surgery. If conservative treatment fails, several surgical procedures are available ranging from arthroscopic debridement to total joint arthroplasty. This study focuses on a new resurfacing technique for the base of the first metacarpal using a polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel implant. Our preliminary study found good clinical outcomes and no inflammatory reaction after a follow-up of 30 months. However prospective studies with a longer follow-up and more patient are needed to confirm these results.

Clinical Evaluation of the Articulinx Intercarpometacarpal Cushion for the First CMC Joint: A Feasibility Study

Background The Intercarpometacarpal Cushion (ICMC; Articulinx, Cupertino, CA, USA) is an implantable spacer designed as a less invasive surgical treatment for osteoarthritis (OA) of the first carpometacarpal joint (CMC-1). Description of Technique Following local anesthesia and exposure of the joint capsule the ICMC, attached to a needle and suture tethers, is guided into the joint space under fluoroscopic visualization through a dorsal approach. The needle is pulled through the thenar eminence to the opposite side of the hand and, once proper device placement is confirmed, cut free and the joint capsule closed. Patients and Methods Eight female patients (median age 56 years; range, 42-83) were treated and followed for 6 to 24 months. Safety of the implant procedure was evaluated intraoperatively. Pain, joint function, and strength were evaluated at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, the QuickDASH inventory, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), and pinch and grip strength measurements. Results At 2 years (n = 6), mean VAS pain scores decreased from 6.3 (± 1.5) to 2.2 (± 1.1) (p < 0.001), mean QuickDASH scores improved from 47 (± 15) to 31 (± 11) (p < 0.10), mean COPM performance scores improved from 5.0 (± 1.2) to 5.5 ( ± 1.3) (p = NS). Mean pinch and grip strength measurements also improved compared with baseline. No serious adverse events occurred. Two device removals occurred, associated with a traumatic event and Stage IV OA with device displacement, at 6 and 9 months respectively. Conclusion The ICMC can be implanted safely. Effectiveness needs to be confirmed in future studies.

Arthroscopic-assisted arthrodesis of the trapeziometacarpal joint

Arthroscopic-assisted surgery of the trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint has been described before for the treatment of TMC joint arthritis including, debridement, partial or total trapezectomy, and interpositional arthroplasty, but its use for fusion is not reported. TMC joint arthroscopy is a novel technique for arthrodesis which aims to maintain joint stability and strength. We have successfully used this technique to perform fusion of the TMC joint. We think that this would offer the possibility of expanding the indications for TMC joint arthroscopy.

A closer look at hand and wrist complaints

Hand or wrist pain is a common complaint in primary care. This pain can be very disabling and can significantly impair a person's quality of life. With the appropriate clinical knowledge and skills, nurse practitioners can effectively evaluate, diagnose, and treat many of the common hand and wrist complaints seen in primary care.

Trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis

Trapeziometacarpal (TM) joint arthritis is a common cause of radial-sided wrist pain that preferentially affects women. It is diagnosed by a thorough history, physical examination, and radiographic evaluation. While radiographs are used to determine the stage of disease, treatment is dependent on symptom severity. Nonoperative treatment frequently consists of activity modification, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), splinting, and corticosteroid injections. After failure of conservative treatment, various surgical options exist depending on the stage of disease. This article reviews the literature supporting the various surgical treatment options. Special consideration is given to the comparison of trapeziectomy with and without tendon interposition and ligament reconstruction.

Predicting grip strength and key pinch using anthropometric data, DASH questionnaire and wrist range of motion

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to examine the influence of anthropometric data, occupational manual strain, DASH (disability of arm, shoulder and hand) score and range of motion (ROM) on grip strength and key pinch. An additional goal was to develop models that enable the prediction of hand strength using the aforementioned parameters.

METHODS

Normative data generated from a healthy working population (n = 750) served as basis for the statistical analysis. Prediction models for hand strength were developed using multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

Gender, body weight and height, BMI and extension ROM correlate positively, age and DASH score, however, correlate negatively with grip strength and key pinch. Occupational manual strain has no influence on hand strength. The predictive power of the developed models was 68.4 % for grip strength and 57.1 % for key pinch.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed models enable the prediction of hand strength using easily obtainable data points. The models will have application in clinical practice, physiological studies, medical evidence and rehab decisions.

Suture-button suspensionplasty for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis

Trapeziectomy has been regaining popularity in treatment of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC). Current approaches to trapeziectomy use Kirschner wire fixation to prevent subsidence of the thumb metacarpal into the newly created trapeziectomy space. This fixation method requires at least 4 weeks of strict immobilization of the thumb. A technique using a suture-button device to suspend the thumb allows for earlier mobilization of the thumb and potentially leads to a faster overall recovery. Preliminary results are promising, but further studies must be conducted to confirm the long-term efficacy of this suture-button suspensionplasty.

7-year follow-up after open reduction and internal screw fixation in Bennett fractures

BACKGROUND

Bennett fractures are unstable, and, with inadequate treatment, lead to osteoarthritis, weakness and loss of function of the first carpometacarpal joint. This study focuses on long-term functional and radiological outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation.

METHODS

Between June 1997 and December 2005, 24 patients with Bennett fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with screws at our center. Radiological and functional assessments including range of motion of the thumb and pinch and grip strength were performed 4 months post-procedure and at the long-term follow-up, on average 83 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Reduction of the Bennett fracture was maintained as it was at the time of the procedure in 96 % of the cases when fixation with two lag screws was performed. At the 4-month follow-up, mean pinch and grip strength reached 92 ± 3 and 89 ± 4 % of the contralateral side, respectively. Long-term follow-up demonstrated no correlation between the accuracy of the fracture reduction and the development of post-traumatic arthritis.

CONCLUSION

Good clinical results could be observed, if successful reduction of the fracture was achieved and maintained. However, there was no correlation between the accuracy of the fracture reduction considering a gap and step <2 mm and the development of arthritis.

Trapezio-metacarpal arthritis: The price of an opposable thumb!

Trapezio-metacarpal arthritis is the most common arthritic problem of the hand for which patients seek surgical treatment. The current article reviews the etio-pathogenesis, epidemiology, classification and management of this widespread problem. The anatomy and unique biomechanics of this joint are also reviewed. In addition, the article provides a detailed description of our preferred method of trapezio-metacarpal arthroplasty.

Clinical outcome of rearthrodesis in cases of non-union following four-corner fusion

PURPOSE

Four-corner fusion is a proven treatment option for degenerative arthritis of the wrist (SLAC/SNAC); however, in some cases, non-union occurs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of rearthrodesis in cases of non-union following four-corner fusion. Furthermore, the goal was to identify the cause of non-union and the location of pseudarthrosis within the fusion.

METHODS

Seven patients (5 males, 2 females) who experienced pseudarthrosis following a four-corner fusion procedure and subsequently elected a rearthrodesis procedure were clinically and radiologically examined. The average age was 58 years (range 48-71 years). Average follow-up after rearthrodesis was 27 months (range 4-60 months). All patients experienced persistent wrist pain and non-union was diagnosed via radiography or CT scan. Range of motion, grip strength, the Modified Mayo Wrist score, and the DASH score were evaluated. The level of pain was determined by using a visual analogue scale. Patients were also asked whether they were satisfied with the procedure and if they would elect it again.

RESULTS

In all patients, the rearthrodesis procedure led to proper bone consolidation, which was verified by radiological examination. Due to persistent wrist pain, one patient required additional procedures (denervation, wrist arthroscopy). In four cases, the location of pseudarthrosis occurred between the triquetrum and hamate. In three cases, the location of pseudoarthrosis was between the capitate and lunate and, additionally, between the triquetrum and hamate. The average DASH score value was 38 and the average Modified Mayo Wrist score was 66. Grip strength was reduced to 85 percent of the contralateral, unaffected side. Three patients indicated that they are dissatisfied with the results and would not elect the procedure again.

CONCLUSIONS

The most frequent location of pseudarthrosis was between the triquetrum and the hamate, which was caused by incomplete cartilage debridement. Proper bone consolidation could be attained by means of rearthrodesis in cases of non-union following four-corner fusion. However, clinical results remain only moderate.

Subjective outcome, neurophysiological investigations, postoperative complications and recurrence rate of partial medial epicondylectomy in cubital tunnel syndrome

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcome with subjective and neurophysiological parameters following partial medial epicondylectomy (pME) and to evaluate complications and recurrence rates. A retrospective analysis was performed in 29 patients (18 males and 11 females) with cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) who underwent pME. Mean time follow-up was 41.4 months. For subjective parameters, DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand), a self-created questionnaire about postoperative satisfaction and a visual pain scale (VAS) have been used. All patients were classified according to the Mc Gowan Classification (McG) and Wilson & Krout Classification (WKC). The patients were examined by nerve conduction velocity. Total mean of the DASH score was 24.8 points. In a questionnaire with integrated pain score (1-5), 96% of the patients declared a postoperative improvement, whereas 41.4% patients of the latter group were very contented with the results, 37.9% were contented, 17.2% were less contented and 3.4% were discontented. The VAS for evaluation of postoperative pain showed an average of 2.36 (0-5.9) out of 10. Of the patients, 68.0% were classified as grade I according to McG and 68.0% as excellent or good according to WKC. Motor nerve conduction velocity improved from 34.8 m/s preoperatively to 48.2 m/s postoperatively. One patient developed a haematoma and three patients (10.3%) had to be classified as recurrence. High postoperative rates of patient satisfaction and improved neurophysiological results could be achieved by pME.