Arthroscopic technique for medial epicondylitis: technique and safety analysis

Mapping Origins of Tendons on the Medial Epicondyle to Improve Treatment of Medial Epicondylitis: Anatomical Study

PURPOSE

Medial epicondylitis is a tendinosis found commonly in throwing and golfing athletes. Although there are choices for nonsurgical treatments, when these fail, surgical intervention can be considered. When surgical treatment is performed, the objective is to debride the diseased tissue from the epicondyle. The purpose of this study was to clarify the locations and size of the common flexor tendons and medial collateral ligament (MCL) relative to each other and to the posterior ridge of the medial epicondyle.

METHODS

The common flexor tendons and MCL were dissected and reflected their origin on the medial epicondyle in six cadaver elbows. Measurements were taken from the posterior and distal ridges of the medial epicondyle with respect to the humerus. Each origin was also measured for its height and width.

RESULTS

The flexor carpi ulnaris origin starts at a mean of 4.2 mm from the posterior ridge of the medial epicondyle and extends anteriorly an average of 4.8 mm. The flexor carpi radialis starts at a mean of 4.2 mm from the posterior ridge and extends anteriorly an average of 7.4 mm. The pronator teres begins at a mean of 4.6 mm from the posterior ridge and extends an average of 5.7 mm anteriorly. The MCL starts at an average of 10.4 mm from the posterior ridge and extends 5.2 mm anteriorly.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurements found have allowed the creation of a map of the specific common flexor tendon origins and their sizes on the medial epicondyle, as well as their position relative to the MCL.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A surgeon may debride 1 cm anteriorly from the posterior ridge of the medial epicondyle to safely address the affected tissues and ensure the safety and integrity of the MCL.

Arthroscopic Medial Bi-portal Extra-articular Debridement for Recalcitrant Medial Epicondylitis

Medial epicondylitis, or golfer's elbow, is characterized by pain and tenderness at the tendon insertion points of the pronator teres and flexor carpi radialis. Conservative treatment is sufficient for most patients, whereas surgical treatment is the best choice for intractable medial epicondylitis. With open surgery or arthroscopic surgery, good clinical results have been reported. However, there is still no consensus on which surgical technique is more ideal. We describe our technique of arthroscopic medial bi-portal extra-articular debridement, which is a safe and effective technique that allows more accurate debridement and maximum protection of the ulnar nerve while reducing surgical scars, relieving postoperative pain, reducing the probability of elbow infection and ankylosis, and shortening the recovery time.

Surgical management for refractory medial epicondylitis based on the anatomical characteristics of flexor pronator origin: surgical results of 8 cases and review of the literature

Background

This case series aimed to introduce surgical management for refractory medial epicondylitis based on the anatomical characteristics of the flexor pronator origin and present the surgical results.

Methods

Ten elbows from 8 patients (2 males and 6 females; mean age 50.2 years) were included in this case series. All patients underwent resection of the degenerated anterior common tendon and repair using suture anchors. Ulnar neuritis was observed in 9 elbows of 7 patients who underwent the relevant additional surgery.

Results

Medial elbow pain was resolved in all patients, and pain provocation tests (wrist flexion test and forearm pronation test) were negative postoperatively. The mean Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (Japanese version) score was significantly improved from 79.6 ± 7.7 (range, 64.3-92) preoperatively to 8.4 ± 15.2 (range, 0-50) at the final follow-up.

Conclusion

Angiofibroblastic tendinosis of the anterior common tendon might be an essential pathology of medial epicondylitis, and anterior common tendon resection and repair could be the most appropriate treatment for medial epicondylitis.

Open procedure vs. arthroscopic débridement for chronic medial epicondylitis

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study compared the outcomes after open and arthroscopic treatment of chronic medial epicondylitis (ME).

METHODS

The study included 44 elbows in 38 patients: 25 (29-72 years) in the open group and 19 (27-70 years) in the arthroscopy group. The indications for ME surgery were failed conservative therapy for more than 3 months, symptom duration exceeding 6 months, and persistent severe pain. We used radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging assessments. The clinical assessment included operating time, range of motion, grip strength, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and complications.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 20.2 (12-58) months. The mean operating time was significantly longer in the arthroscopy group (32.5 vs. 23.5 minutes; P = .029). In both groups, all outcome measures improved significantly after surgery and there were no significant differences between the DASH scores (preoperative 44.8 vs. 43.9, postoperative 12.5 vs. 13.2), grip strength (preoperative 72.2 vs. 66.8, postoperative 84.8 vs. 83.6), and VAS scores (preoperative 8.5 vs. 8.2, postoperative 1.0 vs. 1.1) in the open and arthroscopy groups. The outcomes were excellent or good in 20 patients (80%) in the open group and 16 (84%) in the arthroscopy group. The only complication was 1 case of transient ulnar neuropathy in the open group.

CONCLUSION

Open and arthroscopic techniques were very effective and comparable for treating chronic ME. The surgeon can choose either technique for treating chronic ME.

Far Anterior Medial Portals in Complicated Elbow Arthroscopic Procedures: Safety Profile in a Cadaveric Model

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to describe the placement and evaluate the safety of the far anterior proximal and distal anteromedial portals by comparing them to previously defined portal techniques in a cadaveric model of the elbow.

Methods

Six paired (left and right) fresh, frozen cadaveric elbow joints were dissected. .62-mm Kirschner wires were placed at the literature-defined distal and proximal portal sites on right elbows. The proposed “far anterior” distal and proximal portals were established on the matched left elbows. The elbows were dissected to display the median and ulnar nerves. Digital calipers were used to measure distances from wires to nerves.

Results

For the distal portal, the literature-defined portals were a significantly greater distance (P = .014) from the ulnar nerve (31.22 mm) compared to the far anterior portals (24.65 mm). For the proximal portal, the far anterior portals were a significantly greater distance (P = .026) from the ulnar nerve (26.98 mm) than the literature-defined portals (13.75 mm). There was no significant difference between the far anterior and literature-defined proximal and distal portal techniques in relation to the median nerve.

Conclusions

Analysis of elbow arthroscopy anteromedial portal technique shows the far, anterior, proximal, and distal portals are a safe distance from the ulnar and median nerves. A portal modification that may address complicated elbow conditions is a more anterior placement of the medial portals to allow for better visualization and access.

Clinical Relevance

The elbow is a difficult joint in which to perform arthroscopic surgery. One option our institution has used for safe portal modification to address complicated elbow conditions is a further anterior placement of the medial portals to allow better visualization and access.

Safety of Anteromedial Portals in Elbow Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies

PURPOSE

To systematically review available literature comparing location and safety of 2 common anteromedial portals with nearby neurovascular structures in cadaveric models and to determine the correct positioning and preparation of the joint before elbow arthroscopy.

METHODS

The review was devised in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria consisted of original, cadaveric studies performed by experienced surgeons on male or female elbows evaluating anteromedial portal placement with regard to proximity of the arthroscope to neurovascular structures. Exclusion criteria consisted of case reports, clinical series, non-English language studies, and noncadaveric studies. Statistical analysis was done to measure reviewer reliability after scoring of each study.

RESULTS

During screening, 2,596 studies were identified, and 10 studies met final inclusion as original, cadaveric investigations of anteromedial portal proximity to neurovascular structures. The difference in distance between proximal and distal portals was <1 mm for the brachial artery and <1.5 mm for the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, whereas the ulnar nerve was 4.17 mm further from the distal portal and the median nerve was 5.07 mm further from the proximal portal. Joint distension increased the distances of neurovascular structures to portal sites, with the exception of the ulnar nerve in distal portals. Elbow flexion to 90° increased distances of all neurovascular structures to portal sites.

CONCLUSION

The results show that the proximal anteromedial portal puts fewer structures at risk compared with the distal portal. Elbows in 90° flexion with joint distension carry a lower risk for neurovascular injury during portal placement. These findings suggest the proximal anteromedial portal to be the safer technique in anteromedial arthroscopy of the elbow.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Discrepancies in placement of portals have existed in the literature, indicating differing safety margins regarding surrounding neurovascular anatomy. The present study aims to link together the literature-based evidence to describe the safest anteromedial portal variation.

Arthroscopic features of primary and concomitant flexor enthesopathy in the canine elbow

Objectives: To investigate the possibilities and limitations of arthroscopy to detect flexor enthesopathy in dogs and to distinguish the primary from the concomitant form.

Materials and methods: Fifty dogs (n = 94 elbow joints) were prospectively studied: dogs with primary flexor enthesopathy (n = 29), concomitant flexor enthesopathy (n = 36), elbow dysplasia (n = 18), and normal elbow joints (n = 11). All dogs underwent an arthroscopic examination of one or both elbow joints. Presence or absence of arthroscopic characteristics of flexor enthesopathy and of other elbow disorders were recorded.

Results: With arthroscopy, several pathological changes of the enthesis were observed in 100% of the joints of both flexor enthesopathy groups, but also in 72% of the joints with elbow dysplasia and 25% of the normal joints. No clear differences were seen between both flexor enthesopathy groups.

Clinical significance: Arthroscopy allows a sensitive detection of flexor enthesopathy characteristics, although it is not very specific as these characteristics may also be found in joints without flexor enthesopathy. The similar aspect of both forms of flexor enthesopathy and the presence of mild irregularities at the medial coronoid process in joints with primary flexor enthesopathy impedes the arthroscopic differentiation between primary and concomitant forms, requiring additional diagnostic techniques to ensure a correct diagnosis.

Arthroscopic surgical treatment of medial epicondylitis

BACKGROUND

The study purpose was to evaluate the outcomes of patients who received arthroscopic surgical treatment for medial epicondylitis refractory to conservative treatment.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 7 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgical débridement of the common flexor tendon for treatment of medial epicondylitis refractory to conservative treatment. The patients were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; visual analog scale for pain; and Short Form 36 Health Survey. The mean age at the time of surgery was 50 years (range, 36-67 years). The mean duration of symptoms before surgery was approximately 2 years (range, 8 months to 4 years). The mean follow-up duration was 17 months (range, 6-48 months).

RESULTS

The average postoperative scores were 17 points on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure; 2 points on the visual analog scale at rest for 6 subjects (86%) with slight pain and 1 (14%) with moderate pain; and 78 on the Short Form 36 Health Survey. No significant complications were observed when the procedure was performed via arthroscopy.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic surgical treatment for medial epicondylitis of the elbow exhibits good outcomes and is safe and effective.

Medial elbow pain

Medial elbow pain is uncommon when compared with lateral elbow pain.

Medial epicondylitis is an uncommon diagnosis and can be confused with other sources of pain.

Overhead throwers and workers lifting heavy objects are at increased risk of medial elbow pain.

Differential diagnosis includes ulnar nerve disorders, cervical radiculopathy, injured ulnar collateral ligament, altered distal triceps anatomy or joint disorders.

Children with medial elbow pain have to be assessed for ‘Little League elbow’ and fractures of the medial epicondyle following a traumatic event.

This paper is primarily focused on the differential diagnosis of medial elbow pain with basic recommendations on treatment strategies.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:362-371. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160006

The result of surgical treatment of medial epicondylitis: analysis with more than a 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Angiofibroblastic changes of a musculotendinous origin at the medial epicondyle characterize medial epicondylitis of the elbow. Although nonsurgical treatment is the primary approach for medial epicondylitis, surgical treatment should be considered when conservative therapy fails. This study reports the results of surgical treatment of medial epicondylitis monitored for more than 5 years.

METHODS

This study included 55 patients with 63 cases of medial epicondylitis between 2000 and 2010. The conservative treatment periods lasted for a minimum of 1 year, and steroid injections were administered more than twice before surgery. One surgeon conducted the surgical procedures. The Nirschl and Pettrone grades, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, Mayo Elbow Performance scores, and grip strengths were analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed using paired t tests.

RESULTS

The mean VAS score improved from 8.5 to 2.4 (P <.001). Nirschl and Pettrone grades rated 43% (27 elbows) as excellent and 51% (32 elbows) as good. The Mayo Elbow Performance scores improved from 72 to 88 (P <.001) and DASH scores from 57 to 23 (P <.001). The mean grip strength of the affected side improved from 30 to 43 lb (P <.001). The mean time required to return to work and exercise was 2.8 months and 4.8 months, respectively. One case of heterotrophic ossification, which had no functional instability afterward, was seen.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that surgical treatment of medial epicondylitis could be an effective and safe treatment when conservative treatment fails.

Clinical Outcomes After Suture Anchor Repair of Recalcitrant Medial Epicondylitis

This study evaluated clinical and patient-reported outcomes and return to sport after surgical treatment of medial epicondylitis with suture anchor fixation. Consecutive patients were evaluated after undergoing debridement and suture anchor repair of the flexor-pronator mass for the treatment of medial epicondylitis. Demographic variables, a short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and 10-point pain and satisfaction scales were collected. Ability and time to return to sport after surgery were evaluated, and the relationship between predictor variables and both elbow function and return to sport was investigated. Median age at the time of surgery was 55 years (range, 29-65 years), with median follow-up of 40 months (range, 12-67 months). Median QuickDASH score and OES at final follow-up were 2.3 (range, 0-38.6) and 45 (range, 22-48), respectively. Most patients returned to premorbid sporting activities at a median of 4.5 months (range, 2.5-12 months), whereas 4 patients (14%) reported significant limitations at final follow-up. Older age at the time of surgery was predictive of better QuickDASH score and OES (P=.05 and P=.02, respectively). Patients who underwent surgery after a shorter duration of symptoms had better outcomes, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (QuickDASH, P=.09; OES, P=.10). Surgical treatment of recalcitrant medial epicondylitis with suture anchor fixation offers good pain relief and patient satisfaction, with little residual disability. Older age at the time of surgery predicts a better outcome.

An effective approach to diagnosis and surgical repair of refractory medial epicondylitis

BACKGROUND

Medial epicondylitis of the elbow, an overuse injury characterized by angiofibroblastic tendinosis of the common flexor-pronator origin, generally responds to nonoperative treatment. Refractory cases may require surgical débridement and repair. This study discusses physical examination and imaging findings and an updated surgical technique used in patients with recalcitrant medial epicondylitis.

METHODS

The surgical records of 60 patients with refractory medial epicondylitis were reviewed. All received a course of nonoperative care. After 3 to 6 months of failed therapy, imaging was obtained, and surgical intervention was offered when indicated. This open procedure consisted of thorough débridement with repair and restoration of the flexor-pronator origin, using a suture anchor. Accelerated rehabilitation, emphasizing early motion, was used. One-year follow-ups were obtained. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was calculated preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Pronation weakness at 90° was a critical physical examination finding. Preoperative magnetic resonance images demonstrated pathologic partial tearing at the flexor-pronator origin. Ulnar neuritis was addressed in 20%. Postoperatively, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score significantly increased (preoperatively, 58 ± 7.7; postoperatively, 88 ± 7.8; P = 5.6E-34), and pain significantly decreased (preoperatively, 2.2 ± 0.3; postoperatively, 0.6 ± 0.5; P = 3.8E-33). There was one retear in a patient noncompliant with the postoperative protocol. He responded positively to reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Identification of weakness on pronation is a reliable physical examination finding for determining clinically significant pathologic changes in patients with medial epicondylitis. Débridement with restoration of the flexor-pronator origin is an efficacious procedure. In this large series of patients, surgical repair with aggressive rehabilitation was shown to be reliable and safe in restoring function and relieving pain in recalcitrant cases of medial epicondylitis.

Medial epicondylitis: evaluation and management

Medial epicondylitis, often referred to as "golfer's elbow," is a common pathology. Flexor-pronator tendon degeneration occurs with repetitive forced wrist extension and forearm supination during activities involving wrist flexion and forearm pronation. A staged process of pathologic change in the tendon can result in structural breakdown and irreparable fibrosis or calcification. Patients typically report persistent medial-sided elbow pain that is exacerbated by daily activities. Athletes may be particularly symptomatic during the late cocking or early acceleration phases of the throwing motion. Nonsurgical supportive care includes activity modification, NSAIDs, and corticosteroid injections. Once the acute symptomology is alleviated, focus is turned to flexor-pronator mass rehabilitation and injury prevention. Surgical treatment via open techniques is typically reserved for patients with persistent symptoms.

Tendinopathies Around the Elbow Part 2: Medial Elbow, Distal Biceps and Triceps Tendinopathies

In the second part of this review article the management of medial elbow tendinopathy, distal biceps and distal triceps tendinopathy will be discussed. There is a scarcity of publications concerning any of these tendinopathies. This review will summarise the current best available evidence in their management. Medial elbow tendinopathy, also known as Golfer's elbow, is up to 6 times less common than lateral elbow tendinopathy. The tendinopathy occurs in the insertion of pronator teres and flexor carpi radialis. Diagnosis is usually apparent through a detailed history and examination but care must be made to exclude other conditions affecting the ulnar nerve or less commonly the ulnar collateral ligament complex. If doubt exists then MRI/US and electrophysiology can be used. Treatment follows a similar pattern to that of lateral elbow tendinopathy. Acute management is with activity modification and topical NSAIDs. Injection therapy and surgical excision are utilised for recalcitrant cases. Distal biceps and triceps tendinopathies are very rare and there is limited evidence published. Sequelae of tendinopathy include tendon rupture and so it is vital to manage these tendinopathies appropriately in order to minimise this significant complication. Their management and that of partial tears will be considered.