Lower extremity compensatory neuromuscular and biomechanical adaptations 2 to 11 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

The effect of surface on knee landing mechanics and muscle activity during a single-leg landing task in recreationally active females

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the effect of surface on frontal plane knee angle, knee moment and muscle activity.

DESIGN

Randomised cross over.

SETTING

University Laboratory.

METHODS

Twenty females performed single-leg hop-landings onto sand, grass and firm surfaces. Kinematic, kinetic and muscle activity data were obtained. Compatibility curves were used to visualise parameter estimates alongside P- values, and S-value transforms.

RESULTS

Knee angle for firm-sand (mean difference (d)‾ = -2.2°; 95% compatibility interval (CI): -4.6 to 0.28, p = 0.083, s = 3.6) and firm-grass (d‾ = -1.9; 95% CI: -4.3 to 0.5, p = 0.125, S = 3) yielded <4 bits of reputational information against the null hypothesis (H). 5 bits (p = 0.025) of information against H were observed for knee moment between firm-sand (d‾ = 0.17 N m/kg-1. m-1; 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.31) with similar effects for firm-grass (d‾ = 0.14 N m/kg-1. m-1; 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.29, p = 0.055, S = 4). Muscle activity across surfaces ranged from almost no (S = 1) reputational evidence against H (Quadriceps and Hamstrings) to 10-13 'bits' against H for lateral gastrocnemius (lower on sand).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides valuable information for practitioners of the observed effect sizes for lower-limb landing mechanics across surfaces in asymptomatic females.

Chronic Adaptions in Quadriceps Fascicle Mechanics Are Related to Altered Knee Biomechanics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), patients exhibit abnormal walking mechanics and quadriceps dysfunction. Quadriceps dysfunction has been largely attributed to muscle atrophy and weakness. While important, these factors do not capture intrinsic properties of muscle that govern its ability to generate force and withstand load. While fascicle abnormalities after ACLR have been documented in early stages of recovery (<12 mo), long-term effects of ACLR on fascicle mechanics remain unexplored. We evaluated quadriceps fascicle mechanics during walking 3 years post-ACLR and examined the relationship with knee mechanics. Participants included 24 individuals with ACLR and 24 Controls. Linear mixed models compared the ACLR, Contralateral, and Controls limbs for (1) quadriceps strength, (2) fascicle architecture and mechanics, and (3) knee mechanics. No difference in strength or overall fascicle length excursions was found between limbs. The ACLR limb exhibited longer fascicles at heel strike and peak knee extension moment (P < .001-.004), and smaller fascicle angles at heel strike, peak knee extension moment, and overall suppressed fascicle angle excursions (P < .001-.049) relative to the Contralateral and/or Control limb. This indicates an abnormality in fascicle architecture and mechanics following ACLR and suggests abnormalities in contractile function that cannot be explained by muscle weakness and may contribute to long-term gait irregularities.

Corticomuscular cross-recurrence analysis reveals between-limb differences in motor control among individuals with ACL reconstruction

Surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and subsequent physical therapy can help athletes return to competition; however, re-injury rates remain disproportionately high due, in part, to lingering biomechanical and neurological factors that are not fully addressed during rehabilitation. Prior reports indicate that individuals exhibit altered electrical activity in both brain and muscle after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). In this investigation, we aimed to extend existing approaches by introducing a novel non-linear analysis of corticomuscular dynamics, which does not assume oscillatory coupling between brain and muscle: Corticomuscular cross-recurrence analysis (CM-cRQA). Our findings indicate that corticomuscular dynamics vary significantly between involved (injured) and uninvolved legs of participants with ACLR during voluntary isometric contractions between the brain and both the vastus medialis and lateralis. This finding points to a potential lingering neural deficit underlying re-injury for athletes after surgical reconstruction, namely the dynamical structure of neuromuscular (brain to quad muscle) coordination, which is significantly asymmetric, between limbs, in those who have ACLR.

Does Rotation and Anterior Translation Persist as Residual Instability in the Knee after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? (Evaluation of Coronal Lateral Collateral Ligament Sign, Tibial Rotation, and Translation Measurements in Postoperative MRI)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of residual instability in the knee after ACL reconstruction through the analysis of MRI findings. Methods: This study included patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction between December 2019 and December 2021, and had preoperative and postoperative MRI, clinical scores, and postoperative isokinetic measurements. The anterior tibial translation (ATT) distance, coronal lateral collateral ligament (LCL) sign, and femorotibial rotation (FTR) angle were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. The correlation between the changes in preoperative-postoperative measurements and postoperative measurements with clinical scores and isokinetic measurements was examined. The clinical outcomes were compared based on the presence of a postoperative coronal LCL sign. Inclusion criteria were set as follows: the time between the ACL rupture and surgery being 6 months, availability of preoperative and postoperative clinical scores, and objective determination of muscle strength using isokinetic dynamometer device measurements. Patients with a history of previous knee surgery, additional ligament injuries other than the ACL, evidence of osteoarthritis on direct radiographs, cartilage injuries lower limb deformities, and contralateral knee injuries were excluded from this study. Results: This study included 32 patients. After ACL reconstruction, there were no significant changes in the ATT distance (preoperatively: 6.5 ± 3.9 mm, postoperatively: 5.7 ± 3.2 mm) and FTR angle (preoperatively: 5.4° ± 2.9, postoperatively: 5.2° ± 3.5) compared to the preoperative measurements (p > 0.05). The clinical measurements were compared based on the presence of a postoperative coronal LCL sign (observed in 17 patients, not observed in 15 patients), and no significant differences were found for all parameters (p > 0.05). There were no observed correlations between postoperative FTR angle, postoperative ATT distance, FTR angle change, and ATT distance change values with postoperative clinical scores (p > 0.05). Significant correlations were observed between the high strength ratios generated at an angular velocity of 60° and a parameters FTR angle and ATT distance (p-values: 0.028, 0.019, and r-values: -0.389, -0.413, respectively). Conclusions: Despite undergoing ACL reconstruction, no significant changes were observed in the indirect MRI findings (ATT distance, coronal LCL sign, and FTR angle). These results suggest that postoperative residual tibiofemoral rotation and tibial anterior translation may persist; however, they do not seem to have a direct impact on clinical scores. Furthermore, the increase in tibial translation and rotation could potentially negatively affect the flexion torque compared to the extension torque in movements requiring high torque at low angular velocities.

Neuromuscular activity of the lower-extremities during running, landing and changing-of-direction movements in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of electromyographic studies

PURPOSE

Running, jumping/landing and cutting/change of direction (CoD) are critical components of return to sport (RTS) following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), however the electromyographic (EMG) activity patterns of the operated leg during the execution of these tasks are not clear.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to retrieve EMG studies during running, jumping/landing and cutting/(CoD) in ACLR patients. MEDLINE, PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science databases were searched from 2000 to May, 2022 using a combination of keywords and their variations: "anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" OR "ACLR", "electromyography" OR "EMG", "running", "jumping" OR "landing", "cutting" OR "change-of-direction" OR "CoD". The search identified studies comparing EMG data during running, landing and cutting/(CoD) between the involved limb and contralateral or control limbs. Risk of bias was assessed and quantitative analyses using effect sizes were performed.

RESULTS

Thirty two studies met the inclusion criteria. Seventy five percent (24/32) of the studies reported altered EMG activity pattern of the ACLR leg during running, jumping/landing and cutting/(CoD) when compared with either the healthy control leg or the contra-lateral leg. Twelve studies showed decreased, delayed or earlier onset and delayed peak in quadriceps EMG activity with small to large effect sizes and 9 studies showed increased, delayed or earlier onset and delayed peak in hamstrings EMG activity with small to large effect sizes. Four studies showed a "hamstrings-dominant" strategy i.e. decreased quadriceps coupled with increased hamstrings EMG activity in both running and jumping/landing irrespective of graft type. One study reported that on the grounds of decreased quadriceps activity, lower hamstrings EMG activity was predictive of ipsilateral re-injury in ACLR patients.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review of Level III evidence showed that the ACLR leg displays decreased quadriceps or increased hamstrings EMG activity or both despite RTS. Simultaneous decreased quadriceps and increased hamstrings EMG activity was shown for both running and jumping/landing. From a clinical perspective this "hamstrings dominant" strategy can serve as a protective mechanism against graft re-injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Which assessments are used to analyze neuromuscular control by electromyography after an anterior cruciate ligament injury to determine readiness to return to sports? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Adequate neuromuscular control of the knee could be one element to prevent secondary injuries after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. To assess neuromuscular control in terms of time, amplitude and activity, electromyography (EMG) is used. However, it is unclear which assessments using EMG could be used for a safe return to sports (RTS). Therefore, we aimed to summarize EMG-related assessments for neuromuscular control of the knee in adult patients after an ACL injury to decide upon readiness for RTS.

METHODS

This systematic review followed guidelines of Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane recommendations. MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), SPORTDiscus and the Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2019 and updated in November 2020. Studies identifying electromyographic assessments for neuromuscular control during dynamic tasks in adult, physically active patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury were eligible and qualitatively synthesized. Two independent reviewers used a modified Downs and Black checklist to assess risk of bias of included studies.

RESULTS

From initially 1388 hits, 38 mainly cross-sectional, case-controlled studies were included for qualitative analysis. Most studies provided EMG outcomes of thigh muscles during jumping, running or squatting. Outcomes measures described neuromuscular control of the knee in domains of time, amplitude or activity. Risk of bias was medium to high due to an unclear description of participants and prior interventions, confounding factors and incompletely reported results.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a wide range of EMG outcome measures for neuromuscular control, none was used to decide upon return to sports in these patients. Additional studies are needed to define readiness towards RTS by assessing neuromuscular control in adult ACL patients with EMG. Further research should aim at finding reliable and valid, EMG-related variables to be used as diagnostic tool for neuromuscular control. Moreover, future studies should aim at more homogenous groups including adequately matched healthy subjects, evaluate gender separately and use sport-specific tasks. Registration The protocol for this systematic review was indexed beforehand in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) and registered as CRD42019122188.

Characteristics of landing impact in athletes who have not returned to sports at the pre-injury competition level after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Background

Most patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury undergo ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with the expectation of being able to return to sport (RTS) at the same level of the competition as before the injury. The magnitude and asymmetry of landing impact are important post-ACLR functional variables related to increased ACL strain and poor athletic performance. However, the association between the RTS status and landing impact in post-ACLR patients is unknown.

Objective

To investigate the association between RTS status and landing impact during single-leg landing in post-ACLR patients.

Methods

Forty-four patients after primary, unilateral ACLR participated in this study. They had already participated in sports post-ACLR. Questionnaires were used to assess whether the participants achieved the same competitive level of RTS as before the injury. The magnitude and symmetry of the peak vertical ground reaction force (pVGRF) were collected and analysed during single-leg jump landings. Additionally, knee functions (range of motion, laxity, effusion, strength, and single-leg hop distance) were measured.

Results

A total of 28 (64%) patients reported RTS at their pre-injury competition levels. The no-RTS group had a lower pVGRF magnitude on the operated side than the yes-RTS group (P = .019). The no-RTS group had a higher rate of pVGRF asymmetry (50%) than the yes-RTS group (18%) (P = .040). Logistic regression analysis revealed that pVGRF magnitude and asymmetry were significantly associated with the RTS status. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for knee function revealed that the pVGRF magnitude was significantly associated with the RTS status.

Conclusion

In patients who are unable to RTS at their pre-injury competition level after ACLR, the pVGRF is lower and more likely to be asymmetrical than in those able to RTS at their pre-injury competition level.

Return to sports bridge program improves outcomes, decreases ipsilateral knee re-injury and contralateral knee injury rates post-ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

To present the results of a return to sports bridge program designed to reduce knee injuries following ACL reconstruction and physical therapy.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty (male = 83, female = 67) patients participated in a whole body neuromuscular control, progressive resistance strength and agility training program. Post-program testing included functional movement form, dynamic knee stability, lower extremity power, agility, and sports skill assessments. Participants completed the Knee Outcome Survey-Sports Activity Scale (KOS-SAS) before and after program initiation. Pre-participation scores were re-estimated following program completion.

RESULTS

Global rating KOS-SAS score at program entry was 75 ± 13. Post-program global rating and calculated KOS-SAS were 91.0 ± 9.8 and 90.9 ± 9.7, respectively (p < 0.0001). Pre-participation KOS-SAS score re-estimates at program completion were 54.5 ± 23.3 and 57.3 ± 18.5, respectively. The approximately 20% lower pre-program KOS-SAS score re-estimates (p < 0.0001) observed at program completion suggests that subjects had inaccurately high sports readiness perceptions at program entry. Perceived overall sports activity knee function ratings improved from 2.9 ± 0.6 (abnormal) at program entry to 1.3 ± 0.5 (normal) at completion (p < 0.0001). Most subjects returned back to sports at or above their pre-injury performance skill/performance level (84%, 126/150). By 6.8 ± 3.2 years (range = 2-13 years) post-surgery, ten subjects had sustained an ipsilateral knee re-injury or contralateral knee injury (6.7%). The 2.7% non-contact contralateral and 1.3% non-contact ipsilateral knee injury rates observed were significantly lower than those cited in previous reports.

CONCLUSION

Supplementing primary ACL reconstruction and standard physical therapy with a return to sports bridge program prior to release to unrestricted sports performance was effective at improving patient outcomes and decreasing ipsilateral knee re-injury and contralateral knee injury rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Altered Neuromuscular Activity of the Lower-Extremities During Landing Tasks in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Electromyographic Studies

CONTEXT

Altered lower-limb biomechanics have been observed during landing task in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), which increases the risk of secondary anterior cruciate ligament injury. However, the alteration in neuromuscular activity of the lower-extremity during landing task is not clear.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the muscle activity pattern assessed by electromyography between the involved limb of patients with ACLR and the contralateral limb or control limb of matched healthy subjects during landing task.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Database of PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science from the inception of the databases until July 2019, using a combination of keywords and their variations: (anterior cruciate ligament OR ACL) AND (electromyography OR EMG) AND (landing OR land). Studies that assessed lower-extremity muscle activity patterns during landing task in patients with ACLR and compared them either with the contralateral side or healthy controls were included.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Of the 21 studies, 16 studies reported altered muscle activity pattern during landing tasks when compared with either the healthy controls or the contralateral side. For the specific muscle activity patterns, the majority of the studies showed no significant difference in reactive muscle activity, and comparisons across studies revealed a possible trend toward the early onset of quadriceps and hamstring activity and increased cocontraction of the involved limb. There are inconsistent findings regarding the alteration in muscle timing and preparatory muscle activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ACLR displayed an altered muscle activity pattern during landing tasks, even though they were considered to be capable for sport return. Nevertheless, a firm conclusion could not be drawn due to great heterogeneity in the subject selection and study methods.

The effects of knee extensor moment biofeedback on gait biomechanics and quadriceps contractile behavior

Individuals with knee joint pathologies exhibit quadriceps dysfunction that, during walking, manifests as smaller peak knee extensor moment (pKEM) and reduced knee flexion excursion. These changes persist despite muscle strengthening and may alter stance phase knee joint loading considered relevant to osteoarthritis risk. Novel rehabilitation strategies that more directly augment quadriceps mechanical output during functional movements are needed to reduce this risk. As an important first step, we tested the efficacy of real-time biofeedback during walking to prescribe changes of ±20% and ±40% of normal walking pKEM values in 11 uninjured young adults. We simultaneously recorded knee joint kinematics, ground reaction forces, and, via ultrasound, vastus lateralis (VL) fascicle length change behavior. Participants successfully responded to real-time biofeedback and averaged up to 55% larger and 51% smaller than normal pKEM values with concomitant and potentially favorable changes in knee flexion excursion. While the VL muscle-tendon unit (MTU) lengthened, VL fascicles accommodated weight acceptance during walking largely through isometric, or even slight concentric, rather than eccentric action as is commonly presumed. Targeted pKEM biofeedback may be a useful rehabilitative and/or scientific tool to elicit desirable changes in knee joint biomechanics considered relevant to the development of osteoarthritis.

Neuromuscular activity during stair descent in ACL reconstructed patients: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a severe knee injury. Altered kinematics and kinetics in ACL reconstructed (ACL-R) patients compared to healthy participants (ACL-I) are known and attributed to an altered sensorimotor control. However, studies on neuromuscular control often lack homogeneous patient cohorts. The objective was to examine neuromuscular activity during stair descent in patients one year after ACL reconstruction.

METHOD

Neuromuscular activity of vastus medialis (VM) and lateralis (VL), biceps femoris (BF) and semitendinosus (ST) was recorded by electromyography in 10 ACL-R (age: 26  ±  10   years; height: 175  ±  6  cm; mass: 75  ±  14   kg) and 10 healthy matched controls (age: 31  ±  7  years; height: 175  ±  7  cm; mass: 68  ±  10  kg). A 10-minute walking treadmill warm-up was used for submaximal normalization. Afterwards participants descended 10 times a six-step stairway at a self-selected speed. The movement was separated into pre-activation (PRE), weight acceptance (WA) and push-off phase (PO). Normalized root mean squares for each muscle, limb and movement phase were calculated. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA compared ACL-R injured and contralateral leg and the ACL-I leg (α  =  0.05).

RESULTS

Significant increased normalised activity in ST during WA in ACL-R injured leg compared to ACL-I and during PO in VL in the ACL-R contralateral leg compared to ACL-I. Decreased activity was shown in VM in ACL-R injured compared to contralateral leg (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Altered neuromuscular activations are present one year after ACL reconstruction compared to the contralateral and healthy matched control limb. Current standard rehabilitation programs may not be able to fully restore sensorimotor control and demand further investigations.

Sex Differences on the Landing Error Scoring System Among Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

CONTEXT: 

After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), women have a greater risk of incurring a second anterior cruciate ligament injury and they display different landing movement patterns than men. It remains unclear if clinical movement-assessment tools, such as the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS), can detect sex differences in movement patterns after ACLR.

OBJECTIVE: 

To compare total LESS scores and individual LESS errors between men and women with a history of ACLR.

DESIGN: 

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING: 

Laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: 

A total of 168 individuals (41 men and 127 women; mean age: men = 20 years [range, 19-25 years], women = 19 years [range, 18-20 years]; mean time since surgery: men = 21 months [range, 12-36 months], women = 27.5 months [range, 17-39 months]) with a history of primary, unilateral ACLR.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): 

Participants completed a minimum of 3 trials of a drop vertical-jump task scored using the LESS. The between-sexes difference in LESS score was assessed using analysis of covariance, whereas the associations between participant sex and errors on each LESS item were assessed using logistic or multinomial regression.

RESULTS: 

Women displayed a greater number of total landing errors (men = 4.6 ± 2.3, women = 6.1 ± 2.3; P < .001) and were more likely to commit errors in trunk flexion at initial contact (men = 4.9%, women = 23.6%; odds ratio [OR] = 4.94), medial knee position at initial contact (men = 17.1%, women = 42.5%; OR = 6.01), medial knee displacement (men = 24.4%, women = 73.2%; OR = 7.88), total joint displacement (1 error: men = 58.5%, women = 71.7%, OR = 2.10; 2 errors: men = 7.3%, women = 14.2%, OR = 3.71), and overall impression (1 error: men = 75.6%, women = 84.3%, OR = 3.24; 2 errors: men = 2.4%, women = 10.2%, OR = 12.89) compared with men.

CONCLUSIONS: 

Women with ACLR displayed worse LESS scores and were more likely to commit errors related to medial knee displacement and overall landing quality than men with ACLR.

Countermovement Jump and Isokinetic Dynamometry as Measures of Rehabilitation Status After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

CONTEXT

  Despite an increase in the literature, few definitive guidelines are available to determine when an athlete has been fully rehabilitated after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

OBJECTIVE

  To examine countermovement jump and isokinetic dynamometry measures to (1) identify which measures can best distinguish between ACLR and control participants and (2) provide normative values for identified measures in young adult male multidirectional field-sport athletes.

DESIGN

  Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

  Orthopaedic hospital.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

  Young adult male multidirectional field-sport athletes (n = 118) who had undergone unilateral patellar-tendon graft ACLR at least 6 months earlier and healthy male participants (n = 44) with no previous knee injury.

INTERVENTION(S)

  Single-legged countermovement jump (SL CMJ).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

  Three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of the SL CMJ and mean peak concentric knee-extension and -flexion torque using isokinetic dynamometry (ISO) were compared in the 2 groups. A stepwise logistic regression was carried out to identify the best predictors of ACLR- or control-group membership (SL CMJ height, limb symmetry index, peak power, joint power contribution, ISO peak torque, limb symmetry index variables).

RESULTS

  The control group differed strongly from the ACLR group in isokinetic knee-extension peak torque (d = -1.33), SL CMJ performance (d > 0.4), and limb symmetry measures in both ISO and jump outcomes (d > 1.1). The combination of measures from both ISO and SL CMJ identified group membership with an accuracy of 89%.

CONCLUSIONS

  Rehabilitation of ACLR patients may be complete when they achieve isokinetic knee-extension peak torque of 260% (±40%) body mass, SL CMJ performance of >17 cm (±4 cm), and reach-limb symmetry measures of >90% in both strength and jump outcomes. The outcomes in the control group can inform return-to-play criteria for young adult male multidirectional field-sport athletes after ACLR.

Hip and Knee Kinematics and Kinetics During Landing Tasks After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

  To evaluate the current evidence concerning kinematic and kinetic strategies adopted during dynamic landing tasks by patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

DATA SOURCES

  PubMed, Web of Science.

STUDY SELECTION

  Original research articles that evaluated kinematics or kinetics (or both) during a landing task in those with a history of ACLR were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

  Methodologic quality was assessed using the modified Downs and Black checklist. Means and standard deviations for knee or hip (or both) kinematics and kinetics were used to calculate Cohen d effect sizes and corresponding 95% confidence intervals between the injured limb of ACLR participants and contralateral or healthy matched limbs. Data were further stratified by landing tasks, either double- or single-limb landing. A random-effects-model meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals.

DATA SYNTHESIS

  The involved limbs of ACLR patients demonstrated clinically and significantly lower knee-extension moments during double-legged landing compared with healthy contralateral limbs and healthy control limbs (Cohen d range = -0.81 to -1.23) and decreased vertical ground reaction forces when compared with healthy controls, regardless of task (Cohen d range = -0.39 to -1.75).

CONCLUSIONS

  During single- and double-legged landing tasks, individuals with ACLR demonstrated meaningful reductions in injured-limb knee-extension moments and vertical ground reaction forces. These findings indicate potential unloading of the injured limb after ACLR, which may have significant implications for secondary ACL injury and long-term joint health.

Side-to-side asymmetries in landing mechanics from a drop vertical jump test are not related to asymmetries in knee joint laxity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Asymmetries in knee joint biomechanics and increased knee joint laxity in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are considered risk factors for re-tear or early onset of osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, the relationship between these factors has not been established. The aim of the study was to compare knee mechanics during landing from a bilateral drop vertical jump in patients following ACLR and control participants and to study the relationship between side-to-side asymmetries in landing mechanics and knee joint laxity.

METHODS

Seventeen patients following ACLR were evaluated and compared to 28 healthy controls. Knee sagittal and frontal plane kinematics and kinetics were evaluated using three-dimensional motion capture (200 Hz) and two synchronized force platforms (1000 Hz). Static anterior and internal rotation knee laxities were measured for both groups and legs using dedicated arthrometers. Group and leg differences were investigated using a mixed model analysis of variance. The relationship between side-to-side differences in sagittal knee power/energy absorption and knee joint laxities was evaluated using univariate linear regression.

RESULTS

A significant group-by-leg interaction (p = 0.010) was found for knee sagittal plane energy absorption, with patients having 25% lower values in their involved compared to their non-involved leg (1.22 ± 0.39 vs. 1.62 ± 0.40 J kg^-1). Furthermore, knee sagittal plane energy absorption was 18% lower at their involved leg compared to controls (p = 0.018). Concomitantly, patients demonstrated a 27% higher anterior laxity of the involved knee compared to the non-involved knee, with an average side-to-side difference of 1.2 mm (p < 0.001). Laxity of the involved knee was also 30% higher than that of controls (p < 0.001) (leg-by-group interaction: p = 0.002). No relationship was found between sagittal plane energy absorption and knee laxity.

CONCLUSIONS

Nine months following surgery, ACLR patients were shown to employ a knee unloading strategy of their involved leg during bilateral landing. However, this strategy was unrelated to their increased anterior knee laxity. Side-to-side asymmetries during simple bilateral landing tasks may put ACLR patients at increased risk of second ACL injury or early-onset osteoarthritis development. Detecting and correcting asymmetric landing strategies is highly relevant in the framework of personalized rehabilitation, which calls for complex biomechanical analyses to be applied in clinical routine.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Functional performance 2-9 years after ACL reconstruction: cross-sectional comparison between athletes with bone-patellar tendon-bone, semitendinosus/gracilis and healthy controls

PURPOSE

The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to provide descriptive data on functional performance in men and women with ACLR, to compare bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) with semitendinosus/gracilis (STG) within the same sex and to compare the ACLR subjects with healthy controls.

METHODS

Eligible participants comprised 100 men (43 % BPTB) and 84 women (41 % BPTB) after ACLR, of whom 30 men (STG n = 19; BPTB n = 11) and 18 women (STG n = 12; BPTB n = 6) were untraceable/not willing and 15 men (STG n = 9; BPTB n = 6) and 18 women (STG n = 12; BPTB n = 3) were not able to take part in the measurements because of injury. Besides men BPTB (n = 24), men STG (n = 27), women BPTB (n = 23) and women STG (n = 23), healthy men (n = 22) and women (n = 22) participated. Measurements consisted of questionnaires, isokinetic peak torque and endurance tests, a hop test battery and drop jump including video analysis.

RESULTS

Only the occurrence of dynamic knee valgus differed between ACLR and healthy subjects.

CONCLUSION

Two to nine years after ACLR, 16 % of athletes could not participate because of a lower extremity injury. In the remaining group, this study showed similar results for males and females with BPTB compared with STG. Also, similar results are found for quantity of movement comparing operated and healthy subjects. For quality of movement, only the occurrence of dynamic knee valgus in landing from a jump is higher in operated subjects compared with healthy controls. This supports the relevance of a focus on quality of movement as part of ACLR rehabilitation programmes and return to sports criteria.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Single-limb drop landing biomechanics in active individuals with and without a history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A total support analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to characterize the magnitude and distribution of the total support moment during single-limb drop landings in individuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared to a control group.

METHODS

Twenty participants after reconstruction and twenty control participants matched on sex, limb dominance and activity level were recruited. Motion analysis was performed during a single-limb drop landing task. Total support moment was determined by summing the internal extensor moments at the ankle, knee, and hip. Each relative joint contribution to the total support moment was calculated by dividing each individual contribution by the total support moment. Data were captured during a landing interval that started at initial contact and ended at the lowest vertical position of the pelvis. Data were then time-normalized and indexed at 25, 50, 75, and 100% of the landing interval.

FINDINGS

No between-group differences for total support moment magnitude were observed. At both 75% and 100% of the landing, the relative contribution of the knee joint was lower in those with a history of surgery (p<0.001). At the same instances, the relative contribution to the total support moment by the hip joint was greater in those with a history of surgery (p=0.004).

INTERPRETATION

In active participants after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, relative contributions to anti-gravity support of the center of mass shifted from the knee to the hip joint during single-limb landing, which became evident towards the end of the landing interval.

Comparison of Muscle Activation Levels Between Healthy Individuals and Persons Who Have Undergone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction During Different Phases of Weight-Bearing Exercises

Study Design Cross-sectional, controlled laboratory study. Background Quantification of muscular activation during different phases of functional activities is important to understand activation deficits in individuals who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Objectives To compare activation levels of the vastus medialis (VM), medial hamstrings (MH), and gluteus medius (GMed) muscles during the different phases of weight-bearing tasks between individuals who had undergone ACLR and healthy controls. Methods Surface electromyography was used to measure the activation levels of the VM, MH, and GMed muscles in 16 participants who had undergone ACLR (average time since surgery, 4 years) and 15 healthy participants during the reach and return phases of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) and the ascending and descending phases of a step-down task (SDT). Repeated-measures analyses of variance were performed to determine whether muscle activation levels differed between groups during different phases of the tasks. Results There were significant group-by-phase interactions for the GMed during both the SEBT and SDT. Gluteus medius activation was lower for the ACLR group during the return phase of the posteromedial direction of the SEBT compared to the control group (P = .03). During the SDT, GMed activation was higher for the ACLR group during the ascending phase than during the descending phase (P<.001), while the control group showed no difference between phases (P = .71). Conclusion Individuals who had undergone ACLR have similar VM and MH activation compared to healthy individuals during different phases of the SDT and SEBT. However, phase differences for GMed activity and decreased GMed activity relative to healthy individuals were observed among ACLR participants. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(11):984-992. Epub 11 Oct 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.5896.

Predictors of Revision Surgery After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery occurs in 5% to 15% of individuals undergoing ACL reconstruction. Identifying predictors for revision ACL surgery is of essence in the pursuit of creating adequate prevention programs and to identify individuals at risk for reinjury and revision.

Purpose:

To determine predictors of revision ACL surgery after failed primary ACL reconstruction.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A total of 251 participants (mean age ± SD, 26.1 ± 9.9 years) who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction 1 to 5 years earlier completed a comprehensive survey to determine predictors of revision ACL surgery at a mean 3.4 ± 1.3 years after the primary ACL reconstruction. Potential predictors that were assessed included subject characteristics (age at the time of surgery, time from injury to surgery, sex, body mass index, preinjury activity level, return to sport status), details of the initial injury (mechanism; concomitant injury to other ligaments, menisci, and cartilage), surgical details of the primary reconstruction (Lachman and pivot shift tests under anesthesia, graft type, femoral drilling technique, reconstruction technique), and postoperative course (length of rehabilitation, complications). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors that predicted the need for revision ACL surgery.

Results:

Overall, 21 (8.4%) subjects underwent revision ACL surgery. Univariate analysis showed that younger age at the time of surgery (P = .003), participation in sports at a competitive level (P = .023), and double-bundle ACL reconstruction (P = .024) predicted increased risk of revision ACL surgery. Allograft reconstructions also demonstrated a trend toward greater risk of revision ACL surgery (P = .076). No other variables were significantly associated with revision ACL surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed that revision ACL surgery was only predicted by age at the time of surgery and graft type (autograft vs allograft).

Conclusion:

The overall revision ACL surgery rate after primary unilateral ACL reconstruction was 8.4%. Univariate predictors of revision ACL reconstruction included younger age at the time of surgery, competitive baseline activity level, and double-bundle ACL reconstruction. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that age and reconstruction performed with allograft were the only independent predictors of revision ACL reconstruction.

Motion Task Selection for Kinematic Evaluation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To examine the different motion tasks and the protocols used to objectively quantify dynamic stability in terms of knee kinematics at different stages of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) recovery.

METHODS

A systematic search was done using OVID in Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PsychINFO, and AMED. A combination of the following keywords and their variations were used: anterior cruciate ligament, motion tasks (e.g., jump, hop, gait), and stability. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) ACLR subjects were recruited, (2) at least 1 motion task was performed and kinematics data were recorded, and (3) uninjured subjects or the contralateral uninjured limbs were included as a control group. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) non-English language publications, (2) retrospective studies and review articles, (3) animal studies, and (4) cadaveric studies.

RESULTS

The search returned 2,195 studies, and 56 were included in this review according to the criteria. A total of 1,086 ACLR subjects were included. Pivoting, landing, walking, running, stair negotiation, and squats were assessed using optoelectronic motion capture, electrogoniometry, or video-radiography.

CONCLUSIONS

The appropriate selection of motion tasks is an integral factor in dynamic stability testing as it evokes different kinematic outcomes in relation to the different stages of ACLR recovery. Stair negotiation and landing tasks are best performed during the early stages of recovery, and landing and pivoting are recommended 6 months after ACLR surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, systematic review of Level I and II studies.

Lower extremity muscle activation onset times during the transition from double-leg stance to single-leg stance in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed subjects

BACKGROUND

Previous studies mainly focused on muscles at the operated knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, less on muscles around other joints of the operated and non-operated leg. The aim of this study was to investigate muscle activation onset times during the transition from double-leg stance to single-leg stance in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed subjects.

METHODS

Lower extremity muscle activation onset times of both legs of 20 fully returned to sport anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed subjects and 20 non-injured control subjects were measured during the transition from double-leg stance to single-leg stance in eyes open and eyes closed conditions. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to evaluate differences between groups and differences between legs within both groups, while controlling for peak center of pressure velocity.

FINDINGS

Significantly delayed muscle activation onset times were found in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed group compared to the control group for gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, vastus medialis obliquus, medial hamstrings, lateral hamstrings and gastrocnemius in both eyes open and eyes closed conditions (P<.05). Within the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed group, no significant different muscle activation onset times were found between the operated and non-operated leg (P>.05).

INTERPRETATION

Despite completion of rehabilitation and full return to sport, the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed group showed neuromuscular control deficits that were not limited to the operated knee joint. Clinicians should focus on relearning multi-segmental anticipatory neuromuscular control strategies after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, rehabilitation, and return to play: 2015 update

Anatomical discoveries and a growing appreciation of the knee as a complex organ are driving innovations in patient care decision-making following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Surgeons are increasing their efforts to restore combined mechanical-neurosensory ACL function and placing more consideration on when to reconstruct versus repair native anatomical structures. Surgical options now include primary repair with or without reinforcing the injured ACL with suture-based internal bracing, and growing evidence supports biological augmentation using platelet-rich plasma and mesenchymal stem cells to enhance tissue healing. Physical therapists and athletic trainers are increasing their efforts to facilitate greater athlete cognitive engagement during therapeutic exercise performance to better restore nonimpaired neuromuscular control activation amplitude and timing. Knee brace design and use needs to evolve to better match these innovations and their influence on the rehabilitation plan timetable. There is a growing appreciation for the multifaceted characteristics of the rehabilitation process and how they influence neuromuscular, educational, and psychobehavioral treatment goal achievement. Multiple sources may influence the athlete during the return to sports process and clinical outcome measures need to be refined to better evaluate these influences. This update summarizes contemporary ACL surgical, medical, and rehabilitation interventions and future trends.

Static and dynamic tibial translation before, 5 weeks after, and 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

To evaluate static and dynamic tibial translation before, 5 weeks after, and 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. To explore whether static and dynamic tibial translation are correlated.

METHODS

Ten patients undergoing quadruple hamstring tendon graft ACL reconstruction were evaluated before, 5 weeks after, and 5 years after ACL reconstruction. Sagittal tibial translation was measured during the Lachman test (static translation) and during gait (dynamic translation) using a CA-4000 electrogoniometer.

RESULTS

Five years after ACL reconstruction, static tibial translation did not differ between knees (Lachman test 90 N and 134 N n.s.). In contrast, there was greater maximal anterior tibial translation during gait in ACL-reconstructed knees than in uninjured knees (5.5 ± 1.4 vs. 4.5 ± 1.6 mm, P = 0.028). There were no differences in static or dynamic tibial translation between the 5-year follow-up and before ACL reconstruction or between the 5-year follow-up and the 5-week follow-up. There were no correlations between static and dynamic tibial translation.

CONCLUSION

Although static tibial translation did not differ between knees 5 years after ACL reconstruction, dynamic tibial translation during gait was greater in ACL-reconstructed knees than in uninjured knees. Neither static nor dynamic tibial translation changed 5 years after ACL reconstruction as compared to before surgery and 5 weeks after surgery. Static tibial translation did not correlate with dynamic tibial translation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study indicates that although the knee is stable during static measurements, kinematics during gait is impaired 5 years after ACL reconstruction. This may affect the return to sport and risk of osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

Sex-specific gait adaptations prior to and up to 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled longitudinal laboratory study.

OBJECTIVES

To compare sagittal plane gait mechanics of men and women before and up to 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

BACKGROUND

Aberrant gait patterns are ubiquitous after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and persist after ACLR despite skilled physical therapy. Sex influences postoperative function and second-ACL injury risk, but its influence on gait adaptations after injury has not been investigated.

METHODS

Sagittal plane knee and hip joint excursions during midstance and internal knee and hip extension moments at peak knee flexion were collected in 12 women and 27 men using 3-D gait analysis before (screening) and after preoperative physical therapy (presurgery), and 6 months after ACLR (6 months postsurgery). Repeated-measures analysis-of-variance models were used to determine whether limb asymmetries changed differently over time in men and women.

RESULTS

Significant time-by-limb-by-sex interactions were identified for hip and knee excursions and internal knee extension moments (P ≤.007). Both sexes demonstrated smaller knee excursions on the involved limb compared to the uninvolved limb at each time point (P ≤.007), but only women demonstrated a decrease in the involved knee excursion from presurgery to 6 months postsurgery (P = .03). Women also demonstrated smaller hip excursions (P<.001) and internal knee extension moments (P = .005) on the involved limb compared to the uninvolved limb at 6 months postsurgery. Men demonstrated smaller hip excursions and knee moments on the involved limb compared to the uninvolved limb (P<.001) regardless of time.

CONCLUSION

The persistence of limb asymmetries in men and women 6 months after ACLR indicates that current postoperative rehabilitation efforts are inadequate for some individuals following ACLR.

Lower extremity neuromuscular compensations during instrumented single leg hop testing 2-10 years following ACL reconstruction

BACKGROUND

This study compared lower extremity EMG activation and sagittal plane kinematics of subjects at a minimum of 2 years post-successful ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation during instrumented single leg hop testing.

METHODS

Comparisons were made based on subject responses to the following question, "compared to prior to your knee injury how capable are you now in performing sports activities"? Group 1=very capable, Group 2=capable, and Group 3=not capable. In addition to EMG (1000 Hz) and kinematic (60 Hz) data, subjective knee function, internal health locus of control, sports activity characteristics (intensity, frequency) pre-knee injury, and at follow-up were also compared.

RESULTS

Group 3 had lower perceived knee function, decreased perceived sports intensity, and more subjects with decreased sports activity intensity by two levels compared to pre-injury values. Perceived function scores, anterior laxity measurements and grades were similar between groups. During single leg hop propulsion and landing Group 1 (very capable) had greater involved lower extremity gluteus maximus and medial hamstring activation amplitudes than Group 3 (not capable). Perceived sports capability was related to better subjective knee function, and higher perceived sports activity intensity.

CONCLUSION

Neuromuscular compensations suggesting a hip bias with increased gluteus maximus and medial hamstring activation were identified at the involved lower extremity among most subjects who perceived high perceived sports capability compared to pre-injury status. These compensations may be related to a permanent neurosensory deficit, and its influence on afferent pathway changes that influence CNS sensorimotor re-organization.

Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004-2012

BACKGROUND

The graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is controversial. Hamstring tendon (HT) autografts and patellar tendon (PT) autografts are the most common grafts used and have shown similar subjective and objective outcomes.

PURPOSE

To compare the revision rate between HT and PT autografts used in ACLR in Norway and to estimate the influence of patient age and sex.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

The study included all patients who underwent primary ACLR without concomitant ligament injuries registered in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry from 2004 through 2012. The cohort was stratified by age group (15-19, 20-29, and ≥30 years) and autograft type (HT or PT). Revision rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis, and hazard ratios (HRs) for revision were calculated using multivariate Cox regression models.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up of 4.0 years, 12,643 primary ACLRs were identified, with 3428 PT and 9215 HT grafts, among which 69 revisions with PT grafts and 362 revisions with HT grafts were performed. The overall 5-year revision rate was 4.2%. A higher revision rate was recorded for HT versus PT grafts at all follow-up times. When adjusted for sex, age, and type of graft, the HR for revision was 2.3 (95% CI, 1.8-3.0) for HT grafts compared with PT grafts. The HR for revision in the youngest age group was 4.0 (95% CI, 3.1-5.2) compared with the oldest age group. Sex had no effect on the revision rate.

CONCLUSION

Patients with HT grafts had twice the risk of revision compared with patients with PT grafts. Younger age was the most important risk factor for revision, and no effect was seen for sex. Further studies should be conducted to identify the cause of the increased revision rate found for HT grafts.

Sports involvement following ACL reconstruction is related to lower extremity neuromuscular adaptations, subjective knee function and health locus of control

PURPOSE

This retrospective study compared the influence of perceived sports involvement on lower extremity neuromuscular adaptations during single-leg countermovement jumping (CMJ), perceived knee function and internal health locus of control (HLOC) scores at a minimum 2-year post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The hypothesis was that subjects with higher-level sports involvement would display significant differences compared to subjects with lower-level sports involvement.

METHODS

Uninvolved and involved lower extremity EMG amplitude (1,000 Hz), vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) (500 Hz) and kinematic (60 Hz) displacement differences were determined during single-leg CMJ. These data and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee survey scores, Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Survey internal HLOC subscale scores and sports activity characteristics were compared by sports involvement level.

RESULTS

Subjects that regarded themselves as only sporting sometimes (Group 3, n = 26) had lower IKDC survey and internal HLOC scores, were more likely to decrease sports activities by two intensity levels than highly competitive (Group 1, n = 20) and well-trained/frequently sporting (Group 2, n = 24) subjects, and had greater peak landing VGRF differences suggesting decreased involved lower extremity loading compared to Group 2. During propulsion, Group 1 had greater gluteus maximus (GM) and gastrocnemius (G) EMG differences than Groups 2 and 3. Groups 1 and 2 had decreased vastus medialis (VM) EMG differences during propulsion than Group 3. During landing, Group 1 had greater GM and G EMG differences than Group 3.

CONCLUSION

Subjects with higher-level sports involvement up-regulated involved lower extremity GM and G activation and down-regulated VM activation. This adaptation may enable continued higher-level sports participation while minimizing knee joint forces. Perceived higher-level sports involvement was related to neuromuscular adaptations, better subjective knee function, a more internal HLOC and higher sports activity intensity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic case series, level IV.

Computational modeling of a forward lunge: towards a better understanding of the function of the cruciate ligaments

This study investigated the function of the cruciate ligaments during a forward lunge movement. The mechanical roles of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligament (ACL, PCL) during sagittal plane movements, such as forward lunging, are unclear. A forward lunge movement contains a knee joint flexion and extension that is controlled by the quadriceps muscle. The contraction of the quadriceps can cause anterior tibial translation, which may strain the ACL at knee joint positions close to full extension. However, recent findings suggest that it is the PCL rather than the ACL which is strained during forward lunging. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to establish a musculoskeletal model of the forward lunge to computationally investigate the complete mechanical force equilibrium of the tibia during the movement to examine the loading pattern of the cruciate ligaments. A healthy female was selected from a group of healthy subjects who all performed a forward lunge on a force platform, targeting a knee flexion angle of 90°. Skin-markers were placed on anatomical landmarks on the subject and the movement was recorded by five video cameras. The three-dimensional kinematic data describing the forward lunge movement were extracted and used to develop a biomechanical model of the lunge movement. The model comprised two legs including femur, crus, rigid foot segments and the pelvis. Each leg had 35 independent muscle units, which were recruited according to a minimum fatigue criterion. This approach allowed a full understanding of the mechanical equilibrium of the knee joint, which revealed that the PCL had an important stabilizing role in the forward lunge movement. In contrast, the ACL did not have any significant mechanical function during the lunge movement. Furthermore, the results showed that m. gluteus maximus may play a role as a knee stabilizer in addition to the hamstring muscles.

Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective study was to describe the variability in leg muscle power and hop performance up to 2 years among patients following ACL reconstruction and specifically to illustrate the effects of various criteria for an acceptable level of muscle function.

METHODS

Eighty-two patients (56 men and 26 women)with a mean age of 28 years, who underwent ACL reconstruction using either hamstring tendons (n = 46) or a patellar tendon (n = 36), were assessed pre-operatively and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery with a battery of three lower extremity muscle power tests and a battery of three hop tests.

RESULTS

Leg symmetry index (LSI) values at group level ranged between 73 and 100% at all follow-ups. When the tests were evaluated individually, patients reached an average LSI of ≥ 90% at 24 months. The success rate at 24 months for the muscle power test battery, that is,patients with an LSI of ≥ 90% in all three tests, was 48 and 44% for the hop test battery. The success rate at 24 months for both test batteries on all six muscle function tests was 22%. The criterion of an LSI of ≥ 80% resulted in 53% of the patients having an acceptable level on all six tests,while with a criterion of an LSI of ≥ 100%, none of the patients reached an acceptable level.

CONCLUSION

At group level and in single muscle function tests, the muscle function outcome 1 and 2 years after ACL reconstruction is satisfactory in the present study and on a par with the results presented in the literature. However,when using more demanding criteria for a successful muscle function outcome, using batteries of tests or increasing the acceptable LSI level from ≥ 90% to ≥ 95%or ≥ 100%, the results are considered to be poor. It is suggested that this should be taken into consideration when presenting results after ACL rehabilitation, deciding on the criteria for a safe return to sports, or designing rehabilitation programmes after ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic prospective cohort study, Level I.

Effects of sex on compensatory landing strategies upon return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory, cross-sectional, cohort design.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a sex-specific pattern of lower limb asymmetries is present during a drop vertical jump (DVJ) maneuver at the time of return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

BACKGROUND

A high incidence of second ACL injury is reported after reconstruction; however, the underlying mechanisms of this injury are unclear. While asymmetrical dynamic loading patterns predictive of primary ACL injury in healthy female athletes were observed in female athletes 2 years after ACL reconstruction, it is unknown if similar asymmetries are present in male athletes after ACL reconstruction at the time of return to sport.

METHODS

A total of 98 participants were included in the study, 56 of whom had unilateral ACL reconstruction (35 female, 21 male) and had been released to return to unrestricted level 1 and 2 sports, and 42 of whom were uninjured, activity-matched control participants (29 female, 13 male). Lower extremity kinetic data were analyzed during a bilateral drop vertical jump maneuver from a 31-cm box. Peak vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) was calculated during the landing phase of the drop vertical jump and normalized to body weight (BW). A 2-by-2-by-2 analysis of variance was used to determine differences between side (involved versus uninvolved), group (ACL reconstruction versus control), and sex (female versus male) for the peak VGRF.

RESULTS

A significant side-by-group interaction for peak VGRF (P = .002) was observed during the landing phase of the drop vertical jump in the entire cohort. The involved limb of the ACL reconstructed group displayed significantly lower VGRF (mean ± SD, 1.77 ± 0.35 BW) than the uninvolved limb (2.2 ± 0.4 BW, P<.001) and both the preferred limb (2.0 ± 0.4 BW, P = .002) and nonpreferred limb (2.09 ± 0.42 BW, P<.001) in the control group. No effect of sex was noted.

CONCLUSION

After ACL reconstruction, both male and female participants at the time of return to sport demonstrated involved limb asymmetries in peak VGRF during landing from a bipedal task. These deficits, which persist at the time of return to sport, may increase the risk of future injury and indicate that rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction may require more targeted interventions to address involved limb biomechanical deficits in athletes of both sexes prior to return to sport participation.