Intraoperative navigation evaluation of tibial translation after resection of anterior cruciate ligament remnants

Remnant Preservation of the Primary Vertical Graft in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background

The remnant preservation of a primary vertical graft in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can benefit anteroposterior stability. However, studies that address this concept are rare.

Purpose

To evaluate clinical outcomes of remnant preservation of primary vertical graft in revision ACLR.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 74 patients with revision ACLR were included in this retrospective study. Remnant preservation revision ACLR was performed only in patients with primary vertical grafts. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether the primary remnant vertical graft was preserved (remnant group; n = 48) or absent or sacrificed (no-remnant group; n = 26). The remnant group was further divided according to the degree of remnant tissue: sufficiently preserved subgroup (graft coverage, ≥50%; n = 25) and insufficiently preserved subgroup (graft coverage, <50%; n = 23). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, manual laxity tests, and side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation on Telos stress radiographs.

Results

The mean time to final follow-up was 40.7 ± 16.8 months. The remnant group showed more improved results in the postoperative Lachman test and Telos side-to-side difference than did the no-remnant group (P = .017 and .016, respectively). The post hoc test revealed that the side-to-side difference in laxity in the sufficiently preserved subgroup significantly outperformed that in the no-remnant group (P = .001), although no significant difference existed between the insufficiently preserved and no-remnant subgroups (P = .850). The postoperative IKDC subjective form, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (P = .480, .277, and .883, respectively).

Conclusion

The remnant preservation of the primary vertical graft in revision ACLR may result in better anteroposterior stability. However, subjective outcomes in the remnant group did not exceed that of the no-remnant group. The subgroup analysis revealed that only sufficiently preserved remnants demonstrated better anteroposterior stability.

The Reliability of Classifying the Morphology of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnants during Surgery

Arthroscopic classification of the torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) morphology is fundamental for clinical studies on emerging techniques such as repair and preservation. At present, the most acknowledged classification is Crain description of four morphological patterns. The purpose of the study was to analyze the intra- and interobserver reliability of Crain classification in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgeries. The study included 101 patients who had ACL reconstruction surgery between the years 2014 and 2017. The morphological pattern of ACL remnant scar formation during surgery was observed and classified according to Crain by three orthopaedic surgeons. Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities were measured using kappa statistics. Intraobserver reliability for the Crain classification ranged from 0.63 to 0.83 (substantial to almost perfect agreement). Interobserver reliability was 0.51 (moderate agreement). In almost a third of the cases, observers reported on additional morphological pattern of scar formation that was not well defined by Crain. A modified classification of four patterns was suggested: (A) without scar tissue, (B) with adhesion to the femoral notch (wall or roof), (C) with adhesion to the notch and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), and (D) with adhesion to the PCL. Reanalysis of these four morphological configurations resulted in interobserver reliability of 0.82 (almost perfect agreement). In conclusion, the Crain classification of torn ACL remnant morphology has moderate interobserver reliability; however, a suggested classification with modified and additional configurations has almost perfect reliability and may be useful for studies on ACL repair and preservation.

Clinical outcome of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison among remnant preservation, resection, and absent groups

Purpose

The aim of this study was to verify the effects of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for postoperative clinical scores, anterior stability and frequency of complications compared to remnant removal and cases with remnant defects.

Methods

The 105 patients who underwent anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction were divided into three groups. If the remnant was a Crain I-III type, remnant-preserving bone tunnel creation was attempted. After the creation of the bone tunnel, good continuity was maintained in 34 patients (preserved group). Due to lost continuity, the remnant was resected in 26 patients (resected group). No identifiable remnant continuity remained (Crain IV) in 45 patients (absent group). The Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, anterior stability measured using the KT-1000 arthrometer at 2 years postoperatively, and frequency of complications were compared among the three groups. Univariate and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to clarify the factors affecting postoperative anterior stability.

Results

The Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, IKDC subjective score, and frequency of complications were not significantly different among the groups. The mean side-to-side difference of anterior stability was significantly better in the preserved group (0.3 ± 1.6 mm) compared to the resected group (1.6 ± 2.3 mm, p = 0.003) and absent group (1.6 mm ± 1.7, p = 0.009). The multiple linear regression analysis showed remnant preservation significantly related to postoperative anterior stability.

Conclusion

Although there were no differences in clinical scores, the ACL reconstruction with new preservation technique showed good anterior stability and no difference in the frequency of complications.

The relationship between the clinical results and the remnant type following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring tendon

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the correlations among the preoperative and postoperative knee laxity, the clinical results, and the type of remnant tissue following the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-two patients (male, n = 101; female, n = 91; mean age, 27.1 years) with ACL-deficient knees who had undergone double-bundle reconstruction were included. The time between injury and surgery (TBIS) was 34.7 weeks (range, 1-504 weeks). The subjects were divided into four groups according to the Crain's classifications and factors such as the age at surgery, gender, TBIS, side-to-side difference (SSD), Tegner activity score (TAS), and Lysholm score were compared.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients with ACL remnant pattern types 1, 2, 3, 4 was 19% (37 knees), 52% (101 knees), 9% (19 knees), and 18% (35 knees), respectively. The TBIS of the patients with Crain type 4 was significantly longer in comparison to the other groups ( p < 0.01). A significant difference was observed in the preoperative SSD of the Crain type 3 and Crain type 4 (6.2 ± 3.4 mm, 9.3 ± 3.6, respectively) groups. The TBIS in patients with Crain type 4 was significantly longer in comparison to the other groups ( p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the postoperative SSD, TAS, or Lysholm score.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that a Crain type 3 remnant was associated with a significantly lower preoperative SSD. In addition, the TBIS in patients with Crain type 4 was found to be significantly longer in comparison to the other groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

Greater Laxity in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Knee Carries a Higher Risk of Postreconstruction Pivot Shift: Intraoperative Measurements With a Navigation System

BACKGROUND

The presence of pivot shift after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is correlated with worse clinical outcomes. An orthopaedic navigation system is a useful tool for quantifying laxity in the ACL-deficient knee.

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between preoperative knee laxity measured by a navigation system and postoperative pivot shift (PPS) after ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

One hundred patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction (62 hamstring tendon grafts, 38 patellar tendon grafts) were grouped according to the presence or absence of pivot shift at the 2-year follow-up, and the groups were compared retrospectively. Before surgery, knee laxity was assessed with a navigation system to quantify posterior tibial reduction (PTR) during pivot-shift tests and anterior tibial translation (ATT) during Lachman tests. PTR and ATT cutoff values were determined by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Preoperative PTR and ATT were significantly larger for patients with PPS (PPS-positive group) than those without (PPS-negative group). In the ROC analysis, the PTR had an area under the curve of 0.871 (95% CI, 0.763-0.979; P < .0001) for predicting a PPS; this was larger than that obtained for the ATT, which had an area under the curve of 0.825 (95% CI, 0.705-0.946; P = .001). Because the ROC curve of the ATT had 2 peaks, the ATT alone was not a suitable predictor for PPS. Based on the ROC curve, the optimal PTR cutoff value was 7 mm, with 88.9% sensitivity and 71.4% specificity for PPS (adjusted odds ratio = 19.7; 95% CI, 2.1-187.9; P = .009). Setting the cutoff value as a combination of the PTR (≧7 mm) and ATT (≧12 mm) improved the specificity (88.9% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity; adjusted odds ratio = 149.8; 95% CI, 5.9-3822.7; P = .002) over that with the PTR alone.

CONCLUSION

ACL injuries in knees with a large PTR had a higher risk of PPS. When reconstructing the ACL in a knee with a high degree of laxity, surgeons may need to adopt strategies to prevent PPS.

The remnant preservation technique reduces the amount of bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the correlation between postoperative tunnel enlargement after ACLR and remnant tissue preservation using the hamstring tendon.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety-two subjects (male, n = 101; female, n = 91; mean age 27.1) who had undergone double-bundle ACL reconstruction were included in the present study. The patients were divided into two groups: the remnant tissue preservation group (Group R) and the non-remnant tissue preservation group (Group N). Computed tomographic scans of the operated knee were obtained at 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery. The area of the tunnel aperture for the anteromedial femoral tunnel (FAMT), posterolateral femoral tunnel (FPLT), anteromedial tibial tunnel (TAMT), and posterolateral tibial tunnel (TPLT) was measured. The area at 2 weeks after ACLR was subtracted from the area at 6 months after ACLR and then divided by the area at 2 weeks after ACLR. The differences in the outcomes and characteristics of the two groups were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven knees were classified into Group R, and 115 knees were classified into Group N. The age, gender, and body mass index did not differ to a statistically significant extent. The percentages of FAMT and TAMT enlargement in Group R were significantly smaller in comparison with Group N (P = 0.003 and P = 0.03, respectively). The percentage of FPLT and TPLT enlargement in the two groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent.

CONCLUSION

The remnant-preserving technique reduces the amount of bone tunnel enlargement. The present findings indicate the advantages of the remnant-preserving ACLR technique, and therefore the remnant-preserving technique should be recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Current use of navigation system in ACL surgery: a historical review

PURPOSE

The present review aims to analyse the available literature regarding the use of navigation systems in ACL reconstructive surgery underling the evolution during the years.

METHODS

A research of indexed scientific papers was performed on PubMed and Cochrane Library database. The research was performed in December 2015 with no publication year restriction. Only English-written papers and related to the terms ACL, NAVIGATION, CAOS and CAS were considered. Two reviewers independently selected only those manuscripts that presented at least the application of navigation system for ACL reconstructive surgery.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-six of 394 articles were finally selected. In this analysis, it was possible to review the main uses of navigation system in ACL surgery including tunnel positioning for primary and revision surgery and kinematic assessment of knee laxity before and after different surgical procedures. In the early years, until 2006, navigation system was mainly used to improve tunnel positioning, but since the last decade, this tool has been principally used for kinematics evaluation. Increased accuracy of tunnel placement was observed using navigation surgery, especially, regarding femoral, 42 of 146 articles used navigation to guide tunnel positioning. During the following years, 82 of 146 articles have used navigation system to evaluate intraoperative knee kinematic. In particular, the importance of controlling rotatory laxity to achieve better surgical outcomes has been underlined.

CONLUSIONS

Several applications have been described and despite the contribution of navigation systems, its potential uses and theoretical advantages, there are still controversies about its clinical benefit. The present papers summarize the most relevant studies that have used navigation system in ACL reconstruction. In particular, the analysis identified four main applications of the navigation systems during ACL reconstructive surgery have been identified: (1) technical assistance for tunnel placement; (2) improvement in knowledge of the kinematic behaviour of ACL and other structures; (3) comparison of effectiveness of different surgical techniques in controlling laxities; (4) navigation system performance to improve the outcomes of ACL reconstruction and cost-effectiveness.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Anterior cruciate ligament remnant and its values for preservation

Controversy surrounds the remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Advantages of remnant preservation have been reported in regard to better healing and knee function, although no consensus has been reached. This review article discussed the value and meaning of anterior cruciate ligament remnant preservation in several sections such as effects on healing, remnant classification, biomechanical evaluation, relation to proprioception, animal studies, and clinical studies. We hope that this review will facilitate further discussion and investigation for better treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. So far, the current reviews have not provided sufficient scientific evidence to support the value of preserving the remnant.

Behind-remnant arthroscopic observation and scoring of femoral attachment of injured anterior cruciate ligament

PURPOSE

To describe the femoral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) attachment based on the behind-remnant observation with a new scoring system and to investigate the characteristics of an ACL injured knee.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-six ACL injured knees with four standardized arthroscopic photos and full evaluation under anaesthesia were included in the study. Sixty non-ACL injured knees were also evaluated as control. A scoring system for the femoral ACL attachment was set as follows based on behind-remnant findings; the direct insertion was divided into three portions as proximal, middle and distal. The fibrous extension from the articular surface (indirect insertion) and the severity of synovitis were also graded into 2, 1 and 0 points. The total score was 10 as full marks. The correlation between each score and total score, as well as age at surgery, gender, anterior laxity, pivot-shift test and meniscus injuries, was statistically evaluated with a significance of 0.05.

RESULTS

The femoral attachment score of the ACL injured knees was statistically different from that of the non-ACL injured knees. Anterior laxity was dependent only on the integrity of the proximal portion. Knee instability was significantly correlated with the status of the direct insertion. Medial and lateral meniscus injuries were correlated with the middle part and the distal part of the direct insertion, respectively. The direct insertion was less preserved in distal and articular sides.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic observation behind the remnant of the injured ACL showed clearer findings of the femoral attachment than that from the front. Behind-remnant observation greatly assists in the creation of a correct anatomical tunnel with the preserving remnant. The scoring system indicated several significant correlations between the score and preoperative patient status.

Biomechanical Function of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnants: Quantitative Measurement With a 3-Dimensional Electromagnetic Measurement System

PURPOSE

To evaluate quantitatively the biomechanical function of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnants in patients with ACL injuries. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) with KT-1000 and during the Lachman test with an electromagnetic measurement system (EMS) and tibial acceleration during the pivot shift test with EMS were measured.

METHODS

A total of 121 unilateral ACL injuries were examined. ACL remnants were morphologically classified as being attached to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL group), to the roof of the intercondylar notch (RIN group), to the lateral wall of the intercondylar notch (LWIN group), or as having no substantial remnants (NONE group). Partial ACL tears were excluded. ATT was measured using KT-1000. ATT during the Lachman test and tibial acceleration during the pivot shift test were measured using EMS.

RESULTS

ACL remnant patterns were as follows: PCL group, 27 knees; RIN group, 34 knees; LWIN group, 27 knees; and NONE group, 33 knees. The ATT side-to-side difference in LWIN group (3.4 ± 0.7 mm) by KT-1000 was significantly smaller than the RIN (5.7 ± 1.0 mm) and NONE groups (5.9 ± 1.0 mm) (P < .05). The ATT side-to-side difference during the Lachman test was significantly smaller in the LWIN group (5.3 ± 1.2 mm) than the PCL (8.6 ± 1.4 mm), RIN (8.5 ± 1.2 mm), and NONE groups (7.6 ± 1.0 mm) (P < .05). Tibial accelerations were 2.0 ± 0.4, 1.7 ± 0.2, 1.9 ± 0.2, and 1.8 ± 0.3 m/s(2) in the PCL, RIN, LWIN, and NONE groups, respectively. There were no significant differences among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ACL remnants attached to the lateral wall of the intercondylar notch partially contributed to anterior-posterior stability but did not contribute to dynamic knee stability. These findings suggest that ACL remnants attached to nonanatomic insertion sites do not contribute significantly to knee stabilization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study of nonconsecutive patients.

An Arthroscopic Second-Look Study on the Effect of Remnant Preservation on Synovialization of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of preserved more anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnant on synovial coverage, knee stability, and function after bone patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) allograft reconstruction through second-look arthroscopy and follow-up study.

METHODS

From June 2007 to February 2009, 51 patients received single bundle BPTB allograft ACL reconstruction and second arthroscopic examination. The patients were divided into 4 types according to the types of ACL remnant: type 1, 18 had bridging between the posterior cruciate ligament and the tibia; type 2, 21 had bridging between the intercondylar notch roof and the tibia; type 3, 4 had bridging between the lateral condyle and the tibia; and type 4, 8 subjects had no ACL remnants. Clinical results were evaluated with the KT-1000 maximum displacement test and Lysholm scale at mean 12.3- and 53.5-month follow-up. Second-look synovium coverage was recorded as follows: covering 25% or less, 25% to 50%, 50% to 75%, and more than 75%.

RESULTS

Mean percentage of synovium coverage, Lysholm scale, and KT-1000 side-to-side difference were poorer in types 3 and 4 than the other 2 types at mean 12.3-month follow-up without statistical differences. The result of the final follow-up was comparable with the first one. Four patients had ruptured grafts and accepted revision surgery. Three of them belonged to types 3 and 4, and 1 patient with sport trauma belonged to type 2. There were other 11 patients with different types of impingement and partial absorption of grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Although lack of statistical power, follow-up study and second-look arthroscopy showed that preserved type 3 and 4 ACL remnant caused poorer synovium coverage and might lead to earlier failure when using BPTB allograft. Early minor laxity at 12.3-month follow-up seemed to be not progressive at the final follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

A new behind-remnant approach for remnant-preserving double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with a standard approach

PURPOSE

To introduce a new behind-remnant approach for double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to compare the femoral tunnel positions of anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles between the new and standard procedures by a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT).

METHODS

During DB ACL reconstruction, two approaches for femoral tunnel creation were consecutively practiced from 2010 to 2012. The patients were evaluated retrospectively as a cohort study. A total of 200 primary ACL reconstructions have been performed using a transtibial approach. One approach was a standard approach from the front in which the ACL remnant was peeled off from the attachment, and two guide wires were inserted based on anatomic bony landmarks (standard group). The other approach was a new behind-remnant approach in which the ACL remnant was kept untouched and two guide wires were inserted at the posterior margin of the direct ACL insertion (behind-remnant group). The position of the AM and PL femoral tunnels was expressed on a 3D-CT reconstructive image using the quadrant method with a statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The depth of the AM center was 24 ± 6 % (mean and standard deviation) in the standard group and 22 ± 5 % in the behind-remnant group. The height of the AM tunnel center was 22 ± 8 % in the standard group and 31 ± 8 % in the behind-remnant group. The depth of the PL tunnel center was 32 ± 6 % in the standard group and 35 ± 5 % in the behind-remnant group. The height of the PL tunnel center was 47 ± 9 % in the standard group and 55 ± 7 % in the behind-remnant group. The AM and PL femoral tunnels in both groups were created within the normal anatomic footprint of the previous studies. The behind-remnant approach created a significantly lower femoral tunnel for both AM (p = 0.000) and PL tunnels (p = 0.000). The depth of both AM and PL tunnels was not significantly different between the two groups (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

The new behind-remnant procedure is technically simple and reproducible as a remnant-preserving ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cohort study, Level III.

Editorial Commentary: The Importance of the Simulated Pivot-Shift Test

The simulated pivot-shift test measures knee anterolateral rotatory instability in cadaveric, in vitro, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) research. Clinically, the pivot-shift test is a primary determinant of patient satisfaction after ACL reconstructive surgery.

Dynamic Three-Dimensional Analysis of Lachman Test for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency: Analysis of Anteroposterior Motion of the Medial and Lateral Femoral Epicondyles

PURPOSE

To evaluate dynamic three-dimensional (3D) kinematic properties of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-insufficient knees and healthy contralateral knees in awake patients during the Lachman test using biplane fluoroscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients with unilateral ACL-insufficient knees and healthy contralateral knees were enrolled in this study. Each patient underwent the Lachman test three times in the awake state. The knee joint motions were captured using biplane fluoroscopy. After manual registration of 3D surface data from 3D-computed tomography to biplane images, dynamic 3D kinematic data were analyzed.

RESULTS

The average anteroposterior (AP) translation of the medial femoral epicondyle of the ACL-insufficient knees (11.5±4.2 mm) was significantly greater than that of the contralateral knees (7.7±3.5 mm) (p<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant side-to-side difference in the average AP translation of the lateral femoral epicondyle. During the Lachman test, the distal femur was more externally rotated than the proximal tibia, which showed significant difference between both sides.

CONCLUSIONS

During the Lachman test, the medial femoral epicondyle of the ACL-insufficient knee exhibited greater AP motion than that of the contralateral knee, whereas there was no significant side-to-side difference with regard to the AP motion of the lateral femoral epicondyle.

Effects of Remnant Tissue Preservation on Clinical and Arthroscopic Results After Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Clinical utility of remnant tissue preservation after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has not been established. In addition, no studies have evaluated the clinical utility of remnant preservation after anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS

The study hypotheses were as follows: (1) Subjective and functional clinical results may be comparable between anatomic double-bundle reconstructions that preserve the remnant tissue and those that resect the remnant tissue, (2) postoperative knee stability and the second-look arthroscopic evaluation may be significantly more favorable with the remnant-preserving reconstruction, and (3) the degree of the initial graft coverage may significantly affect postoperative knee stability.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 179 patients underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Based on the Crain classification of ACL remnant tissue, 81 patients underwent the remnant-preserving procedure (group P) and the remaining 98 patients underwent the remnant-resecting procedure (group R). There were no differences between the 2 groups concerning all background factors, including preoperative knee instability and intraoperative tunnel positions. The patients were followed for 2 years or more.

RESULTS

The subjective and functional clinical results were comparable between the 2 reconstruction procedures. Side-to-side anterior laxity was significantly less (P = .0277) in group P (0.9 mm) than in group R (1.5 mm). The pivot-shift test was negative in 89% of group P and 78% of group R patients; the result for group R was significantly lower (P = .0460). In the arthroscopic observations, results for group P were significantly better than for group R concerning postoperative laceration and fibrous tissue coverage of the grafts (P = .0479).

CONCLUSION

Remnant preservation in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction did not significantly improve subjective and functional results in the short-term evaluation, but it significantly improved postoperative knee stability. The degree of initial graft coverage significantly affected postoperative knee stability.

Partial tearing of the anterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis and treatment

Partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are common and represent 10–27% of the total. The main reasons for attending to cases of non-torn bundles are biomechanical, vascular and proprioceptive. Continued presence of the bundle also serves as protection during the healing process. There is controversy regarding the definition of these injuries, which is based on anatomy, clinical examination, translation measurements, imaging examinations and arthroscopy. The way in which it is treated will depend on the existing laxity and instability. Conservative treatment is optional for cases without instability, with a focus on motor rehabilitation. Surgical treatment is a challenge, since it requires correct positioning of the bone tunnels and conservation of the remnants of the torn bundle. The pivot shift test under anesthesia, the magnetic resonance findings, the previous level and type of sports activity and the arthroscopic appearance and mechanical properties of the remnants will aid the orthopedist in the decision-making process between conservative treatment, surgical treatment with strengthening of the native ACL (selective reconstruction) and classical (anatomical) reconstruction.

Comparison of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and single-bundle reconstruction with remnant pull-out suture

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability and functional outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by tensioning of the ACL remnant using pull-out sutures compared with ACL double-bundle reconstruction.

METHODS

Forty-four patients were included in single-bundle reconstruction with remnant tensioning group (Group 1), and 56 patients were included in the double-bundle reconstruction group (Group 2). The remnant tissue was tensioned to the direction of posterolateral bundle, which unrelated to the type of remnant bundle. Objective knee stability was evaluated by anterior stress radiography, KT-1000 and lateral pivot shift tests. The Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee and OrthopädischeArbeitsgruppeKnie scoring systems were used for clinical evaluation.

RESULTS

No statistically significant intergroup differences were observed in mechanical stability and clinical results (n.s). However, surgical time of remnant tensioning group is shorter than double-bundle reconstruction group (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Remnant tensioning suture with single-bundle reconstruction could be used with positive results as good as double-bundle technique if a good ACL remnant was found bridging the femur and tibia, rather than debride or damage to the remnant tissue during operation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective, comparative cohort study, Level IV.

Roles of ACL remnants in knee stability

PURPOSE

This study evaluated knee laxity in anterior tibial translation and rotation following removal of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnants using a computer navigation system.

METHODS

This prospective study included 50 knees undergoing primary ACL reconstruction using a navigation system. ACL remnants were classified into four morphologic types: Type 1, bridging between the roof of the intercondylar notch and tibia; Type 2, bridging between the posterior cruciate ligament and tibia; Type 3, bridging between the anatomical insertions of the ACL on the lateral wall of the femoral condyle and the tibia; and Type 4, no bridging of ACL remnants. Anterior tibial translation and rotatory laxity were measured before and after remnant resection using a navigation system at 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. The amount of change in anterior tibial translation and rotatory laxity of each type was compared among the types.

RESULTS

The different morphologic types of ACL remnants were as follows: Type 1, 15 knees; Type 2, 9 knees; Type 3, 6 knees; and Type 4, 20 knees. The amount of change in anterior tibial translation and rotatory laxity at 30° knee flexion in Type 3 was significantly larger than in the other types. There were no significant differences in either tibial translation or rotatory laxity at 60° and 90° knee flexion among the types.

CONCLUSIONS

In Type 3, ACL remnants contributed to anteroposterior and rotatory knee laxity evaluated at 30° knee flexion. The bridging point of the remnants is important to knee laxity. The Type 3 remnant should be preserved as much as possible when ACL reconstruction surgery is performed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, level II.

Biomechanical analysis of the knee with partial anterior cruciate ligament disruption: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system

PURPOSE

To investigate the biomechanical function of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnants in ACL-deficient knees with both partial and complete tears.

METHODS

Twenty partial ACL-deficient (group P), 20 complete ACL-deficient (group C), and 40 contralateral ACL-intact knees were examined. The end point during the Lachman test, side-to-side differences of KT-1000 measurements, and the pivot shift test were evaluated. Additionally, the side-to-side difference of anterior tibial translation during the Lachman test and the acceleration during the pivot shift test were calculated using an electromagnetic measurement system (EMS).

RESULTS

The end point was found in 9 patients in group P, whereas it was not detected in group C. In KT-1000 measurements, the mean side-to-side differences were 3.8 ± 2.4 mm in group P and 5.4 ± 2.3 mm in group C. There was a significant difference between these 2 groups (P < .05). In the pivot shift test evaluation in group P, one patient was evaluated as grade 0, 17 patients as grade 1+, and 2 patients as grade 2+. In group C, 10 patients were evaluated as grade 1+, 9 patients as grade 2+, and one patient as grade 3+. Using the EMS, mean side-to-side differences during the Lachman test were 3.1 ± 2.1 mm in group P and 7.2 ± 3.2 mm in group C. The anterior-posterior displacement in group P was significantly less than that in group C (P < .05). In the quantitative pivot shift test, the mean acceleration in the contralateral ACL-intact knees was -632.7 ± 254.5 mm/s(2), whereas it was -1107.5 ± 398.9 mm/s(2) in group P and -1652.2 ± 754.9 mm/s(2) in group C. Significant differences were detected between the 3 knee conditions (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The quantitative assessments of knees with partial ACL ruptures during the Lachman test and the pivot shift test using the EMS showed less laxity than did knees with complete ACL tears, whereas their laxity was greater than the contralateral knees with intact ACLs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study of nonconsecutive patients.