The effects of hamstring harvesting on outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed patients: a comparative study between hamstring-harvested and -unharvested patients

The Effect of Gracilis Tendon Preservation on Postoperative Knee Joint Stability and Muscle Strength in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery

The aim of our study is to evaluate preserving gracilis tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery and its effect to the flexion of the knee joint and tibial internal rotation strength and the stability of the knee. Patients who underwent primary single-bundle arthroscopic ACLR using all-inside technique and using hamstring tendon autograft were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups as gracilis preserved (St) and gracilis harvested (StG) groups. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Knee-related quality of life (KOOS-QOL) score, ACL-Return to Sport after Injury scale score were used to evaluate as postoperative functional scores at last follow-up. Anterior tibial translation was evaluated using the KT-1000 device. Knee joint flexion, extension, and internal rotation strength were evaluated using isokinetic dynamometer. Dynamic balance performances were measured using the Biodex Balance System. There were 24 patients in the St group and 23 patients in the StG group. Demographic data and clinical results showed no significant difference. Anteroposterior movement of the tibia was found to be significantly higher in the StG group than in the St group in measurements at 89 and 134 N, respectively (p = 0.01 and <0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between both standard and deep flexor and extensor and internal rotator strength. No statistically significant difference was found in the amount of total, anteroposterior, and mediolateral balance deficit between the two groups. Additional gracilis harvesting does not have a negative effect on both standard and deep knee flexion, and tibial internal rotation strength compared with the St group. Although semitendinosus and StG group showed significantly more anterior tibial translation, there was no significant difference in clinical and dynamic stability measurements.

Sequential Comparison of Knee Muscle Strength after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction between Hamstring Autograft and Tibialis Anterior Allograft: Propensity Score Matched Pair Analysis

Among the graft options for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), hamstring autografts are widely regarded as the preferred choice for primary ACLR among orthopedic surgeons worldwide. However, concerns persist regarding postoperative knee flexor weakness. We aimed to compare knee extensor and flexor strengths between hamstring autograft and tibialis anterior allograft groups in ACLR patients, who were propensity score-matched based on baseline characteristics. A retrospective analysis included 58 matched pairs who underwent isokinetic strength tests at 6 and 12 months post operation. Isokinetic muscle strength tests found no significant difference in knee extensor and flexor strength at 6 months post operation between the hamstring autograft and tibial anterior allograft groups. At 12 months, the hamstring autograft group exhibited significantly greater knee flexor deficit (total work and average power) compared to the allograft group, despite no differences in extensor strength or patient-reported outcomes. This study highlights the impact of hamstring autograft harvesting on muscle strength and recovery following ACLR in short-term period.

Anterior cruciate ligament: A brief narrative review of main risk factors for injury and re-injury

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the main injuries in professional and amateur athletes of different sports. Hundreds of thousands of ACL ruptures occurs annually, and only 55% of the athletes return to competitive level, with a 15 times higher chance of suffering a second injury. 60% of these injuries occur without physical contact and since they occur in the acute process, they can cause joint effusion, muscle weakness and functional incapacity. In the long term, they can contribute to a premature process of osteoarthritis. This narrative review is of particular interest for clinicians, practitioners, coaches and athletes to understand the main factors that contribute to an injury and/or re-injury and thus, to optimize their training to reduce and/or prevent the risk of injury and/or reinjury of ACL. Therefore, we aimed reports a narrative overview of the literature surrounding communication and explore through a theoretical review, the main risk factors for an ACL injury and/or re-injury, as well as bringing practical and correct methods of training applications. The lack of theoretical/practical knowledge on the part of rehabilitation and/or training professionals may impair the treatment of an athlete and/or student. High-quality research that can testing different training methods approaches in randomized controlled trials is needed.

Autograft Demonstrates Superior Outcomes for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction When Compared With Allograft: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have compared outcomes among patients undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with autograft versus allograft, but these data are inconsistently reported and long-term outcomes depending on graft type are yet to be determined.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of clinical outcomes after revision ACLR (rACLR) with autograft versus allograft.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify studies that compared the outcomes of patients undergoing rACLR with autograft versus allograft. The search phrase used was autograft allograft revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Graft rerupture rates, return-to-sports rates, anteroposterior laxity, and patient-reported outcome scores (subjective International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner, Lysholm, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met inclusion criteria, including 3011 patients undergoing rACLR with autograft (mean age, 28.9 years) and 1238 patients undergoing rACLR with allograft (mean age, 28.0 years). Mean follow-up was 57.3 months. The most common autograft and allograft types were bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts. Overall, 6.2% of patients undergoing rACLR experienced graft retear, including 4.7% in the autograft group and 10.2% in the allograft group (P < .0001). Among studies that reported return-to-sports rates, 66.2% of patients with an autograft returned to sports as opposed to 45.3% of patients with an allograft (P = .01). Two studies found significantly greater postoperative knee laxity in the allograft group as compared with the autograft group (P < .05). Among all patient-reported outcomes, 1 study found 1 significant difference between groups: patients with an autograft had a significantly higher postoperative Lysholm score when compared with patients with an allograft.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing revision ACLR with an autograft can be expected to experience lower rates of graft retear, higher rates of return to sports, and less postoperative anteroposterior knee laxity when compared with patients undergoing revision ACLR with an allograft.

Influence of strength and balance ability on functional performance in the involved and uninvolved sides after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The restoration and management of the uninvolved side have been emphasized to prevent a second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and to ensure that athletes return to sports after ACL reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the factors influencing the single leg hop test (SLHT) and single leg vertical jump test (SLVJT) at 1 year postoperatively after ACL reconstruction in both the involved and uninvolved sides.

METHODS

Ninety-four patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were assessed at 1 year postoperatively. Multiple regression models included eight independent variables with two dependent variables (SLHT and SLVJT.), each on the involved and uninvolved side.

RESULTS

On the involved side, the Y balance test (YBT), extensor peak torque per body weight (PT/BW), Biodex balance system anteroposterior index (BBS-API), and sex accounted for 53.9% of the variance in SLHT (P= 0.002), and extensor PT/BW and YBT accounted for 26.3% of the variance in SLVJT (P= 0.027). On the uninvolved side, YBT, sex, age, BBS-API, and flexor PT/BW accounted for 47.0% of the variance in SLHT (P= 0.046), and flexor PT/BW, YBT, and age accounted for 44.9% of the variance in SLVJT (P= 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Knee extensor strength on the involved side and flexor strength on the uninvolved side influence the two functional performance tests. The YBT was an important factor in the two functional performance tests in both sides. Anteroposterior stability was the only factor that influenced the SLHT bilaterally.

Evaluation of Isokinetic Knee Strengths after ACL Reconstruction with Quadrupled Semitendinosus Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Fixation versus Four-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Screw Fixation

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus suspensory femoral and tibial fixation have comparable results in muscle strength and knee function to those undergoing ACL reconstruction with four-strand semitendinosus-gracilis suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2017 and 2019, 64 patients who were operated on by the same surgeon were included. Patients underwent ACL reconstruction technique with quadrupled semitendinosus suspensory femoral and tibial button fixation in Group 1, and patients underwent ACL reconstruction with coupled four-strand semitendinosus-gracilis suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw in Group 2. Evaluation of patients was performed with the Lysholm and Tegner activity scale preoperatively and at the 1st and 6th months postoperatively. At the 6-month visit, isokinetic testing of the operated and non-operated limbs was performed in both groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the age, weight, and BMI values of the patients in Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). According to the strength values of the operated sides of the patients in Group 1 and Group 2, there was no significant difference in the angular velocities of 60° s^-1, 180° s^-1, and 240° s^-1 in both extension and flexion phases between the operated sides of Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who have ACL reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus suspensory femoral and tibial fixation have comparable muscle strength and knee function to those who undergo ACL reconstruction with four-strand semitendinosus-gracilis suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw.

Correlation of Y Balance with Clinical Scores and Functional Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young and Middle-Aged Patients

Background

Criteria for return to sports (RTS) following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been extensively studied. But there is no consensus among investigators regarding which factors are most important in determining a safe RTS.

Methods

Sixty-one patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were included. Subjective knee scoring systems (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] score and Lysholm score), functional performance tests (carioca test and single-leg hop for distance [SLHD] test), and isokinetic knee strength test were used for assessment and analyzed for association with the limb symmetry index (LSI) of the Y-balance test for lower quarter (YBT-LQ).

Results

The LSI of the YBT-LQ was significantly correlated with Lysholm score, IKDC score, Carioca, LSI for the SLHD, and extensor strength deficit at 6 months after ACL reconstruction. At 12 months, Lysholm score, IKDC score, LSI for the SLHD, and extensor strength deficit were significantly correlated with the LSI of the YBT-LQ.

Conclusions

The YBT-LQ test could be used conveniently as an additional tool to assess the patient's functional performance results after ACL reconstruction in outpatient clinics.

The effect of gracilis tendon harvesting in addition to semitendinosus tendon harvesting on knee extensor and flexor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring tendons may involve harvesting of the gracilis tendon in addition to the semitendinosus tendon (ST) depending on the size of the ST graft. However, the effect of gracilis harvesting in addition to ST harvesting on muscle strength, such as the hamstring-to-quadriceps (HQ) ratio, remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the effect of gracilis harvesting on subsequent knee muscle strength.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-two patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into the following two groups depending on the tendon graft used for ACL reconstruction: the ST group (41 patients) and the semitendinosus tendon/gracilis tendon (STG) group (41 patients). The isokinetic peak torque of the knee extensor and flexor was measured using a BIODEX dynamometer at a velocity of 60°/s and 180°/s, respectively, 3 and 6 months after ACL reconstruction. The groups were compared in terms of the limb symmetry index (LSI) and HQ ratio.

RESULTS

The significant difference in the knee flexor of the LSI at 6 months after ACL reconstruction was as follows: ST group, 120.3 ± 28.3 vs STG group, 105.6 ± 19.0 (p < 0.01) at 60°/s and ST group, 122.9 ± 35.2 vs STG group, 106.2 ± 24.6 (p = 0.02) at 180°/s. There were significant differences in the HQ ratio at 180°/s as follows: ST group, 0.67 ± 0.15 vs STG group, 0.60 ± 0.13 (p < 0.01) at 3 months and ST group, 0.67 ± 0.13 vs STG group, and 0.59 ± 0.12 (p < 0.01) at 6 months after ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Gracilis tendon harvesting may contribute to a decrease in knee flexor strength and HQ ratio with fast contraction. Thus, the need for gracilis tendon harvesting in ACL reconstruction should be carefully considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Minimal graft site morbidity using autogenous semitendinosus graft from the uninjured leg: a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

To quantify the effect on strength of semitendinosus (ST) graft harvest by comparing isokinetic and isometric muscle strength.

METHODS

A cohort of 140 patients underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) and were randomized to ipsilateral or contralateral ST graft harvest. Isokinetic and isometric muscle strength testing using a dynamometer were collected for the operated and non-operated leg. Patients were assessed pre-surgery and at 6, 12 and 24 months after reconstruction.

RESULTS

ST graft harvest reduced isokinetic flexion muscle strength for 6 months. At 12 months follow up there was no significant difference between the two groups and they were all stronger than pre-injury. No other significant differences were found in any primary or secondary outcome measurements.

CONCLUSION

Solitary ST graft harvest does not appear to result in a permanent reduced isometric or isokinetic quadriceps muscle strength on the side where the graft is harvested. A reduction in hamstring muscle strength of less than 10% can be seen at short-term follow-up with full recovery by 12 months. Most patients report little or no donor site pain. Given these findings, ST autograft is an alternative graft choice that could be used for various reconstructions in terms of donor site morbidity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Knee flexor strength and symmetry vary by device, body position and angle of assessment following ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts at long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

Persistent deficits in knee flexor strength following harvest of semitendinosus and gracilis for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are inconsistent in the literature. Variation in methodology, including measuring torque at higher knee flexion angles may partially explain these discrepant findings. The objective of this study was to determine whether positioning (seated vs supine), consideration of peak or joint-angle-specific torque or device (Isokinetic Dynamometer vs NordBord Hamstring Dynamometer) impact the magnitude of knee flexor strength differences between limbs.

METHODS

Participants (n = 31, 44.2 ± 10.7 years,) who were at 14 ± 4.4 years follow-up for unilateral ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus/gracilis grafts completed the ACL Quality of Life outcome and an assessment including isokinetic concentric knee extensor and flexor strength in seated and supine with peak torque and torque at 60° (T60) and 75° (T75) knee flexion measured, followed by an eccentric Nordic Hamstring Curl.

RESULTS

Isokinetic concentric knee flexor torque was reduced in supine relative to seated, on the reconstructed limb against the unaffected, and at higher degrees of knee flexion relative to peak torque (T60 and T75 against peak torque). Limb symmetry varied by methodology (F_(6,204) = 8.506, p = 0.001) with reduced symmetry in supine T75 against all measures (71.1 ± 16.5%, p < 0.05), supine T60 against seated peak torque (82.7 ± 14.2%, p < 0.05), and the NordBord was lower than seated peak torque that was not statistically significant (83.9 ± 12.8%, n.s.). Knee extensor peak (r² = 0.167 (F_(1,27) = 5.3, p = 0.03) and Nordic curl eccentric torque (r² = 0.267, F_(2,26) = 4.736, p = 0.02) were predictors of ACL-QoL score, although a combined model did not improve over Nordic torque alone.

CONCLUSION

Limb symmetry cannot be assumed in clinical practice across differing assessment methods for knee flexor strength as deficits are greatest in the supine position with torque measured at 75° knee flexion. Isokinetic knee extensor and eccentric knee flexor torque during the Nordic hamstring curl were predictors of ACL-QoL scoring and should be considered alongside patient-reported outcomes for patients following ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Gracilis and semitendinosus moment arm decreased by fascial tissue release after hamstring harvesting surgery: a key parameter to understand the peak torque obtained to a shallow angle of the knee

PURPOSE

Semitendinosus and gracilis muscles whose tendons are used in surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament maintain their contractile ability, but the peak torque angle of hamstring muscles shifted to a shallow angle postoperatively. The goal was to quantify the influence of the myofascial structures on instantaneous moment arms of knee muscles to attempt explaining the above-mentioned post-surgical observations.

METHODS

Hamstring harvesting procedures were performed by a senior orthopaedic surgeon on seven lower limbs from fresh-frozen specimens. Femoro-tibial kinematics and tendons excursion were simultaneously recorded at each step of the surgery.

RESULTS

No significant difference was demonstrated for instantaneous moment arm of gracilis during anterior cruciate ligament surgery (84% of the maximum intact values; P ≥ 0.05). The first significant semitendinosus moment arm decrease was observed after tendon harvesting (61% of the maximum intact values; p ≤ 0.005). After hamstring harvesting, the maximum and minimum moment arm (both gracilis and semi tendinosus) shifted to a shallow angle and 90°, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Moment arm modifications by paratenons and the loose connective tissue release are essential to understand the peak torque obtained to a shallow angle.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Basic science study, biomechanics.

Changes in hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with tibialis allograft

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in hamstring strength both after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with hamstring autograft followed by early rehabilitation and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) with tibialis allograft followed by delayed rehabilitation.

Methods

Isokinetic strengths of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles and endurances were compared between a group of 20 patients undergoing PCLR using a tibialis anterior allograft and a 1:2 matched control group of 40 patients undergoing ACLR using a hamstring autograft at 2 years after the operations. Clinical results were also compared using stability tests and the Lysholm and the International Knee Documentation Committee scores.

Results

At 2 years after the operations, the torque deficit of the hamstring muscle in the involved leg compared to the uninvolved leg at both 60°/s and 120°/s was greater in the PCLR group than in the ACLR group (60°/s, 21.8 ± 14.0% versus 1.9 ± 23.9%, P = 0.0171; 120°/s, 15.3 ± 13.7% versus −0.7 ± 17.4%, p = 0.012, respectively). The peak torque of the hamstring muscle at 120°/s was significantly lower in the involved leg than in the uninvolved leg only in the PCLR group (71.3 ± 31.9 N∙m versus 81.9 ± 27.8 N∙m, P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the clinical results between the groups except for a side-to-side difference in the tibial translation on Telos stress radiographs.

Conclusion

The strength of the hamstring of the PCLR leg with allograft was significantly weaker than that of the unoperated leg after 2 years, whereas that of the ACLR leg with hamstring autograft maintained a similar level of strength compared to that of the uninvolved leg.

Level of evidence

Level III, case–control study.

The Influence of Perioperative Nerve Block on Strength and Functional Return to Sports After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Patients often have quadriceps or hamstring weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), despite postoperative physical therapy regimens; however, little evidence exists connecting nerve blocks and ACLR outcomes.

PURPOSE

To compare muscle strength at return to play in patients who received a nerve block with ACLR and determine whether a specific block type affected subjective knee function.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients were recruited 5 to 7 months after primary, isolated ACLR and completed bilateral isokinetic strength tests of the knee extensor/flexor groups as a single-session return-to-sport test. Subjective outcomes were assessed with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. Strength was expressed as torque normalized to mass (N·m/kg) and limb symmetry index as involved/uninvolved torque. Chart review was used to determine the type of nerve block and graft used. Nerve block types were classified as knee extensor motor (femoral nerve), knee flexor motor (sciatic nerve), or isolated sensory (adductor canal block/saphenous nerve). A 1-way analysis of covariance controlling for graft type was used.

RESULTS

A total of 169 patients were included. Graft type distribution consisted of 102 (60.4%) ipsilateral bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) and 67 (39.6%) ipsilateral hamstring tendon. Nerve block type distribution consisted of 38 (22.5%) femoral, 25 (14.8%) saphenous, 45 (26.6%) femoral and sciatic, and 61 (36.1%) saphenous and sciatic. No significant difference was found in knee extensor strength (P = .113) or symmetry (P = .860) between patients with knee extensor motor blocks (1.57 ± 0.45 N·m/kg; 70.1% ± 15.3%) and those without (1.47 ± 0.47 N·m/kg; 69.6% ± 18.8%). A significant difference was found between patients with knee flexor motor blocks (0.83 ± 0.26 N·m/kg) and those without (0.92 ± 0.27 N·m/kg) for normalized knee flexor strength (P = .21) but not knee flexor symmetry (P = .592). Controlling for graft type, there were no differences in subjective knee function (IKDC score) between all nerve block groups (P = .57).

CONCLUSION

Our data showed that use of a sciatic nerve block with ACLR in patients with hamstring and BTB grafts influences persistent knee flexor strength deficits at time of return to sports. Although the cause of postoperative muscular weakness is multifactorial, this study adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that perioperative nerve blocks affect muscle strength and functional rehabilitation after ACLR.

Isolated gracilis tendon harvesting is not associated with loss of strength and maintains good functional outcome

PURPOSE

The gracilis tendon is a commonly used autologous graft. Most information on knee function and outcomes after its harvest is related to both semitendinosus- and gracilis tendon harvest. Therefore this study analyzed the effect of isolated gracilis tendon harvest from healthy, uninjured knees on thigh muscle strength and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

Stabilization of the acromioclavicular joint because of chronic instability was performed with autologous gracilis tendon in 12 patients. After a mean of 44 ± 25 months after surgery, isokinetic peak-torque measurements of specific functions of the gracilis muscle were performed: knee flexion in a sitting position (flexion angles 0-90°) and in prone position (flexion angles > 70°), internal tibial rotation and hip adduction. The contralateral limb was control. Knee specific PROMs were collected including IKDC-2000 subjective evaluation form, Lysholm score, the Marx Activity Rating Scale and SF-36 health survey.

RESULTS

No significant side-to-side differences were found regarding torque measurements. Excellent results were shown regarding the PROMs, which even in terms of IKDC-2000 (97 vs. 82 points, p = 0.001) exceeded significantly the age- and gender matched reference-data.

CONCLUSION

Isolated gracilis tendon harvesting was not associated with loss of strength in knee flexion, internal tibial rotation and thigh adduction. Additionally, good functional outcome as well as excellent knee-specific subjective outcome was found.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Superior knee flexor strength at 2 years with all-inside short-graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction vs a conventional hamstring technique

PURPOSE

To compare the "all-inside technique" for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a short, quadrupled semitendinosus tendon (ST4) autograft and suspensory cortical fixation on both the femoral and tibial side vs the "conventional technique" using a semitendinosus/gracilis (ST/G) autograft fixed with a suspensory device on the femoral side and with an interference screw on the tibial side, in terms of clinical and functional outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 90 patients were enrolled, randomised into two groups, and prospectively followed. Group A comprised 45 patients treated with the all-inside technique and Group B included 45 patients treated with the conventional ACL technique (55 males, 35 females; mean age 28.7 ± 11.3 years). Patients completed the Lysholm knee score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS), and the Knee Society Score (KSS) preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Anterior tibial translation measurement (KT-1000 arthrometer) and isokinetic testing of the operative vs non-operative limb were also conducted and the limb symmetry index (LSI) was determined.

RESULTS

At 24 months, the Lysholm, IKDC, KOOS, and KSS scores between the two groups were similar (n.s.). Anterior tibial translation between the operative and non-operative knee was also similar among the two groups (n.s.). Patients of Group A had significantly higher mean LSIs in terms of flexor peak torque (1.0 ± 0.1 vs 0.9 ± 0.1; p < 0.001), time-to-peak (0.9 ± 0.1 vs 0.8 ± 0.1; p < 0.001) and total work (0.9 ± 0.1 vs 0.8 ± 0.1; p < 0.001) at 180°/s, and significantly better mean LSI for isometric flexor/extensor ratio at 90° (1.1 ± 0.3 vs 0.8 ± 0.2; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The all-inside ACL reconstruction with an ST4 autograft and cortical button fixation on both ends is a viable alternative to the conventional technique. It affords preservation of knee flexor strength, which is of advantage, especially when treating athletes with ACL injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Clinical, functional, and isokinetic study of a prospective series of anterior cruciate ligament ligamentoplasty with pedicular hamstrings

PURPOSE

Few studies describe the specific results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with pedicled hamstring graft (HG). Our goal was to report the isokinetic, clinical, and functional outcomes over the post-operative year following pedicled hamstring ligamentoplasty.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with ACL rupture (mean age 27.4 years) were included prospectively. The technique used a four-stranded HG transplant pedicled to the tibia. The functional result (Lysholm knee score and subjective IKDC score), clinical result (KT-1000, Lachman test, joint amplitudes, objective IKDC score), and isokinetic complication occurrence were analyzed at six months and 12 months follow-up. The functional results, clinical parameters, and complications were analyzed at 30 months follow-up. The comparison of the variables with the various regressions was carried out by a Wilcoxon sign test.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were reviewed at six, nine, 12, and 30 months. The mean Lysholm knee score was 90/100 at six months, 96/100 at one year, and 95/100 at 30 months. The mean subjective IKDC score was 77/100 and 89/100 at six and 12 months, and 91/100 at 30 months. The mean difference in laxity compared with the healthy knee was 1.4 mm at six months, 1.9 mm at 12 months, and 2 mm at 30 months. The objective IKDC score was A or B for all patients at 12 and 30 months. The average quadriceps strength deficit decreased from 27 to 16% between six and 12 months post-operative (p = 0.0091) and the average flexor deficit from 23 to 12% (p = 0.0084). No complications were identified.

CONCLUSION

The abovementioned technique allows reaching functional, clinical, and isokinetic results comparable with the standard techniques while preserving the mechanical and biological interest of tibial insertion.

Hamstring Braid Graft Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Hamstring autograft is one of the most used grafts for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, although there are several graft preparation techniques. It is extremely difficult to mimic the biomechanical properties of the native ACL; thus, it is important to achieve a proper graft configuration, diameter, and length. To avoid reruptures, an optimal and reproducible hamstring autograft is desired. Hamstring autograft has been traditionally devalued when compared with other options such as bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe in detail a hamstring braid graft configuration that could potentially overcome the past disadvantages of ACL reconstruction.

Biologically Enhanced Hamstring Tendon Transfer for Treatment of Acute Rupture of Posterior Tibialis Tendon in an Athlete: Case Report

We report the case of a 32-year-old basketball player who presented with an acute flatfoot deformity after performing a unipodal power jump. Rupture of the posterior tibial tendon within the foot was diagnosed and then treated by hamstring tendon transfer combined with application of autologous biologic preparations. The functional outcome at 18 months was good. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of posterior tibial tendon rupture treated by hamstring tendon transfer.

Functional Effects of Single Semitendinosus Tendon Harvesting in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Single versus Dual Hamstring Harvesting

Background

This study aimed to determine the effects of single semitendinosus tendon (ST) harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by comparing outcomes of single ST and semitendinosus-gracilis tendon (ST-G) harvesting.

Methods

ACL reconstruction with ST-G harvesting (D group, n = 60) or single ST harvesting (S group, n = 60) were included according to inclusion criteria. Subjective assessments included subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale score. Objective assessments included isokinetic strength and functional tests. These tests were completed at 36 months of follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and second-look arthroscopy findings were evaluated. In the S group, regeneration properties were assessed by serial ultrasonography (US).

Results

The S group showed significantly less deep flexor strength deficit than the D group (p < 0.001). Deep flexor power deficits showed significant correlation with the shift of musculotendinous junction of the ST. There was significant difference in the cocontraction test between the groups (p = 0.012), and the S group tended to show better results in other functional tests at the last follow-up. There were no significant differences in graft tension and synovial coverage on second-look arthroscopy between the groups. In the S group, the regeneration rates assessed by US at the joint line and distal insertion were 81.7% and 80%, respectively at 6 months of follow-up.

Conclusions

The S group showed significantly less deficit in deep flexor strength and tended to show better clinical results at the last follow-up than the D group. In the S group, more than 80% showed good regeneration at the 6-month follow-up. Hence, single ST harvesting is effective in minimizing flexor weakness and functional deficits and shows great potential for regeneration.

Improvements in Thigh Strength Symmetry Are Modestly Correlated With Changes in Self-Reported Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

The association between quadriceps strength and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a focus of current research, while evaluations of hamstring strength are limited, despite the frequent use of hamstring autografts.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between changes in quadriceps and hamstring strength symmetry and self-reported outcomes before ACLR and at 12 and 24 weeks after surgery. We hypothesized that improvements in quadriceps and hamstring strength symmetry would be correlated with improvements in self-reported outcome measures within the first 6 months after ACLR.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

Thirty patients who underwent ACLR with a hamstring autograft were enrolled. Quadriceps and hamstring strength and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) values were assessed before and at 12 and 24 weeks after ACLR; limb symmetry indexes for strength were calculated at each time point. The Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to analyze changes in KOOS values over time. Spearman rank-order correlations were used to test the relationship between changes in strength and KOOS values between each time point.

Results:

Hamstring and quadriceps limb symmetry significantly increased with time (P ≤ .03). Fair correlations were observed between changes in the hamstring index and changes in the KOOS Symptoms subscore from before surgery to 12 weeks postoperatively (r = 0.48; P ≤ .05). Changes in the quadriceps index (QI) were moderately correlated with changes in the KOOS Sport/Recreation subscore (r = 0.60; P = .001), and fair correlations were seen between the QI and the KOOS Quality of Life subscore (r = 0.39; P ≤ .04) from preoperatively to 12 weeks after surgery. Moderate correlations were seen between the QI and the KOOS Sport/Recreation subscore (r = 0.57; P = .005) from 12 to 24 weeks after surgery.

Conclusion:

Improvements in quadriceps and hamstring strength symmetry were modestly associated with improvements in athletes’ perceived function in the first 6 months after ACLR. Specifically, improvements in hamstring symmetry were associated with improvements in knee symptoms within the first 12 weeks postoperatively, while improvements in quadriceps symmetry were associated with improvements in self-reported sport function throughout the first 6 months after ACLR. The restoration of strength symmetry within the first 6 months may be a critical component of rehabilitation aimed at maximizing function after ACLR. Further investigation is warranted to comprehensively evaluate whether the timing of strength gains predicts future function, including those who successfully return to their preinjury activity level after ACLR.

Strength recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts in soccer players: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The comparison between HT and QT grafts in strength recovery and function after an ACLR is scarce in the literature.

METHODS

A total of 56 participants were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial and placed into two groups: HT or QT. The hamstring/quadriceps (H/Q) ratio was the primary end-point measured with a Genu-3 dynamometer. Peak torque, functional assessment (Lysholm knee scoring scale and Cincinnati Knee Rating System), and anteroposterior laxity (KT-2000™ arthrometer) were also assessed. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The results of the H/Q ratio analysis of the participants over time revealed significant differences at 60, 180, and 300°/s at three, six, and 12months of follow-up (60°/s: F=5.3, p=0.005; 180°/s: F=5.5, p=0.004; 300°/s: F=5.1, p=0.005). Furthermore, they revealed significant differences at 60°/s, 180°/s, and 300°/s in the participants over time for peak torque in the extensor muscle strength at three and six months of follow-up, with higher values in the hamstring tendon group but not at 12months of follow-up. There were no significant differences in functional endpoints or arthrometer assessments at 24months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

An ACLR with a QT graft showed similar functional results with a better isokinetic H/Q ratio compared to an ACLR with the HT at 12months of follow-up in soccer players. This higher H/Q ratio observed with the QT could be an advantage of this graft over the HT for an ACLR.

Tripled semitendinosus with single harvesting is as effective but less invasive compared to standard gracilis-semitendinosus harvesting

Introduction

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with pes anserinus tendons has been increasingly used throughout the last years. Although less invasive compared to other autologous grafts, a reduction of internal rotation and flexion strength after gracilis and semitendinosus harvesting has been reported. Harvesting one tendon instead of two from the pes anserinus can reduce the deficit of the knee flexor strength and improve the functional recover without weakening the reconstructed ligament.

Methods

Forty-five (45) patients who had ACL reconstruction with triple semitendinosus graft (ST3) have been compared with other 45 similar patients who had ACL reconstruction with double gracilis-semitendinosus tendons (GST). Patients have been evaluated at a minimum of 12 months after surgery: IKDC scale, KT-1000, One Leg Hop Test for the objective stability; Isokinetic test for the strength; Tegner scale, Lysholm and IKDC subjective evaluation form for the function.

Results

No differences have been detected between the groups for the objective item assessed. Male patients' subjective IKDC score was statistically better for the ST3 group. Recreational soccer players showed a higher Lysholm and subjective IKDC score in ST3 group compared to GST group. There was no difference regarding the return to sport.

Conclusion

ST3 guarantees the same objective knee stability compared to a GST. It is a viable option for ACL reconstruction that allows a better preservation of patient's anatomy and a less invasive harvesting surgery.

Level of evidence

III b, case control study.

Is There a Difference in Graft Motion for Bone-Tendon-Bone and Hamstring Autograft ACL Reconstruction at 6 Weeks and 1 Year?

BACKGROUND

Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) grafts are generally believed to heal more quickly than soft tissue grafts after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but little is known about the time course of healing or motion of the grafts within the bone tunnels.

HYPOTHESIS

Graft-tunnel motion will be greater in hamstring (HS) grafts compared with BTB grafts and will be less at 1 year than at 6 weeks.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twelve patients underwent anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction using HS or BTB autografts (6 per group) with six 0.8-mm tantalum beads embedded in each graft. Dynamic stereo x-ray images were collected at 6 weeks and 1 year during treadmill walking and stair descent and at 1 year during treadmill running. Tibiofemoral kinematics and bead positions were evaluated. Graft-tunnel motion was based on bead range of motion during the loading response phase (first 10%) of the gait cycle.

RESULTS

During treadmill walking, there was no difference in femoral tunnel or tibial tunnel motion between BTB or HS grafts at 6 weeks (BTB vs HS: 2.00 ± 1.05 vs 1.25 ± 0.67 mm [femoral tunnel]; 1.20 ± 0.63 vs 1.27 ± 0.71 mm [tibial tunnel]), or 1 year (BTB vs HS: 1.62 ± 0.76 vs 1.08 ± 0.26 mm [femoral tunnel]; 1.58 ± 0.75 vs 1.68 ± 0.53 mm [tibial tunnel]). During stair descent, there was no difference in femoral or tibial tunnel motion between BTB and HS grafts at 6 weeks or 1 year. With running, there was no difference between graft types at 1 year. For all results, P values were > .05. Knee kinematics were consistent with the literature.

CONCLUSION

During walking and stair descent, ACL reconstruction using suspensory fixation yielded no difference between graft types in femoral or tibial tunnel motion at 6 weeks or 1 year. All subjects were asymptomatic with knee kinematics similar to that of the literature. The significance of persistent, small (1 to 3 mm) movements at 1 year for healing or graft performance is unknown.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These study results may have significant implications for graft choice, rehabilitation strategies, and timing for return to sports.

Patient-Centered Outcomes and Revision Rate in Patients Undergoing ACL Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Compared With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allograft: A Matched Case-Control Study

PURPOSE

To determine whether outcomes after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft are similar to those of BPTB allograft, while controlling for graft, surgical technique, and surgeon.

METHODS

This study was approved by the institutional review board at The Vail Valley Medical Center in Vail, Colorado. Patients 18 to 70 years old who underwent primary ACL reconstruction were included. Patients in each group were matched by age and gender. Patient demographic data, surgical data, and subjective data were collected prospectively. Subjective questionnaires were administered at a minimum of 2 years after ACL reconstruction.

RESULTS

This study included 192 knees (191 patients; 143 male, 48 female; mean age, 33 years; range, 18 to 57 years), with 96 knees in each group. No autografts required ACL revision. The revision rate for allograft group was 14% (n = 11; mean age, 23 years; range, 18 to 40 years). Of 11 revisions, 9 (82%) were ≤25 years old. In allograft group, patients ≤25 years old were 23 times (95% confidence interval, 4.4 to 123.0) more likely to require revision ACL reconstruction than patients >25 years (P < .001). Follow-up was available for 87% of patients (n = 156/180). Mean follow-up time in the allograft group was 4.7 years (range, 2.0 to 9.8 years), and in the autograft group, 8.6 years (range, 2.0 to 16.2 years; P < .001). There was no significant difference between allografts and autografts for mean Lysholm (85.6 v 83.4; P = .43), mean Tegner (6.0 v 5.4; P = .09), or mean patient satisfaction (9.0 v 8.8; P = .57). Lysholm score correlated to Tegner (rho = 0.404; P < .001) and patient satisfaction with outcome (rho = 0.443; P ≤ .001). Tegner was correlated with age at surgery (rho = -0.274; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in patient-centered outcomes based on graft type; however, the allograft group required more revisions. Patient satisfaction was high for both groups. ACL reconstruction using BPTB autograft or allograft produces similar outcomes; however, revision rates were higher for allografts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

High Variability in Outcome Reporting Patterns in High-Impact ACL Literature

BACKGROUND

ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) reconstruction is one of the most commonly performed and studied procedures in modern sports medicine. A multitude of objective and subjective patient outcome measures exists; however, nonstandardized reporting patterns of these metrics may create challenges in objectively analyzing pooled results from different studies. The goal of this study was to document the variability in outcome reporting patterns in high-impact orthopaedic studies of ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

All clinical studies pertaining to ACL reconstruction in four high-impact-factor orthopaedic journals over a five-year period were reviewed. Biomechanical, basic science, and imaging studies were excluded, as were studies with fewer than fifty patients, yielding 119 studies for review. Incorporation of various objective and subjective outcomes was noted for each study.

RESULTS

Substantial variability in reporting of both objective and subjective measures was noted in the study cohort. Although a majority of studies reported instrumented laxity findings, there was substantial variability in the type and method of laxity reporting. Most other objective outcomes, including range of motion, strength, and complications, were reported in <50% of all studies. Return to pre-injury level of activity was infrequently reported (24% of studies), as were patient satisfaction and pain assessment following surgery (8% and 13%, respectively). Of the patient-reported outcomes, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner scores were most often reported (71%, 63%, and 42%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial variability in outcome reporting patterns exists among high-impact studies of ACL reconstruction. Such variability may create challenges in interpreting results and pooling them across different studies.

Relationship between quadriceps strength and patellofemoral joint chondral lesions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The incidence of the patellofemoral joint chondral lesions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is disturbingly high. Few studies have assessed the factors affecting patellofemoral joint chondral lesions postoperatively.

HYPOTHESIS

The recovery of quadriceps strength after ACLR could be associated with patellofemoral joint cartilage damage.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 88 patients who underwent arthroscopic anatomic double-bundle ACLR with hamstring autografts received second-look arthroscopy at the time of metal staple removal at an average of 24.1 months (range, 12-51 months) postoperatively. All patients underwent standardized isokinetic strength testing for bilateral quadriceps and hamstrings 1 to 2 days before second-look arthroscopy. The patients were divided into 2 groups: Patients in group 1 had a ≥20% deficit on the peak torque measures for quadriceps compared with that of the contralateral knee, whereas those in group 2 had a <20% deficit on peak torque. Cartilage status at the patellofemoral joint and tibiofemoral joint were evaluated by second-look arthroscopy and the Outerbridge classification. Other assessments included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner and Lysholm scores, side-to-side difference on KT-2000 arthrometer, and range of motion.

RESULTS

There were 42 patients included in group 1 and 46 patients in group 2. The mean postoperative quadriceps peak torque of the involved knee compared with the contralateral knee was 70% (range, 57%-80%) in group 1 and 95% (range, 81%-116%) in group 2. For all patients, a significant worsening was seen in the patellar and trochlear cartilage (P = .030 and <.001, respectively) but not at the medial or lateral tibiofemoral joint after ACLR. A significant worsening in the status of both patellar and trochlear cartilage was seen after ACLR in group 1 (P = .013 and =.011, respectively) and of trochlear cartilage in group 2 (P = .006). Significantly fewer severe chondral lesions of the patella were found in group 2 than in group 1 (proportion of patients whose cartilage grade worsened: 26% vs 48%, P < .05; difference in cartilage grade: 0.09 vs 0.62, P < .05). There was no significant difference for trochlear chondral worsening between the 2 groups. No significant differences were detected between the 2 groups in terms of hamstring strength; Lysholm, Tegner, and IKDC scores; KT-2000 arthrometer anterior laxity; or range of motion.

CONCLUSION

Greater than 80% recovery of quadriceps strength after ACLR is associated with less severe patellar cartilage damage at short-term follow-up.

Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft versus autograft

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to compare and analyze retrospectively the outcomes of arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft versus allograft.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-one patients who underwent arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an autograft or allograft met our inclusion criteria. There were 36 patients in the autograft group and 35 patients in the allograft group. All the patients were evaluated by physical examination and a functional ligament test. Comparative analysis was done in terms of operation time, incision length, fever time, postoperative infection rate, incidence of numbness and dysesthesia around the incision, as well as a routine blood test.

RESULTS

The average follow-up of the autograft group was 3.2 ±0.2 years and that of the allograft group was 3.3 ±0.6 years; there was no significant difference (p > 0.05). No differences existed in knee range of motion, Lysholm scores, International Knee Documentation Committee standard evaluation form and Tegner activity score at final follow-up (p > 0.05), except that patients in the allograft group had a shorter operation time and incision length and a longer fever time (p < 0.05). We found a difference in posterior drawer test and KT-2000 arthrometer assessment (p < 0.05). The posterior tibia displacement averaged 3.8 ±1.5 mm in the autograft group and 4.8 ±1.7 mm in the allograft group (p < 0.05). The incidence of numbness and dysesthesia around the incision in the autograft group was higher than that in the allograft group (p < 0.05). There was no infection postoperatively. The white blood cells and neutrophils in the allograft group increased more than those in the autograft group postoperatively (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both groups of patients had satisfactory outcomes after the operation. However, in the instrumented posterior laxity test, the autograft gave better results than the allograft. No differences in functional scores were found.

Role of gracilis harvesting in four-strand hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a double-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

Weakness in knee flexion following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the key issues in the treatment of an ACL tear. The purpose of this study was to examine and compare clinical outcome measures of ACL reconstruction using semitendinosus autograft (ST) versus semitendinosus + gracilis (ST/G) reconstructive techniques.

METHODS

In a double-blind randomized clinical study, 19 patients with an ACL tear underwent either ST (59) or ST/G (61) and observed for 1 year. Both patients and the final examiner were unaware as to the type of graft received. Patients were evaluated according to subjective criteria, functional assessment tests, knee isometric torques, knee laxity using KT-2000 and knee range of motion.

RESULTS

The study included 21 (17.6 %) female and 99 (82.4 %) male patients with a mean age of 29.9 ± 7.8 in the ST group and 32.4 ± 6.3 in the ST/G group. There were no significant differences found in surgical complications; IKD; Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; Lysholm; strength of the knee isometric flexors; and flexion and extension loss between the two groups. At the final visit, 86.9 % of ST group and 89.6 % of ST/G group had side-to-side difference of laxity <3 mm (n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

Since anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled ST is more technically demanding than doubled STG and with there being no difference in outcomes and complications, no compulsory advice should be made on the former technique. However, gracilis harvesting may not be necessary based on the function and strength of the knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Randomized controlled trial, Level I.

Tendon and fascial structure contributions to knee muscle excursions and knee joint displacement

BACKGROUND

Semitendinosus and gracilis muscles whose tendons are used in surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament maintain their contractile ability, and a limited decrease of hamstring muscles force is observed postoperatively despite important changes. The goal was to quantify the influence of the myofascial structures on excursions and moment arms of knee muscles to attempt explaining the above-mentioned post-surgical observations.

METHODS

Hamstring harvesting procedures were performed by a senior orthopaedic surgeon on seven lower limbs from fresh-frozen specimens. Femoro-tibial kinematics and tendons excursion were simultaneously recorded at each steps of the surgery.

FINDINGS

No significant difference was demonstrated for excursions and moment arms after tenotomies and gracilis tendon harvesting (P≥0.05). The first significant semitendinosus excursion (P<1.17×10(-4)) and moment arm (P<6.88×10(-5)) decrease was observed after semitendinosus tendon harvesting (46% of the initial excursion).

INTERPRETATION

Gracilis and semitendinosus myofascial pathway is crucial for force transmission towards the knee joint.

Return to play following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review about strength deficits

PURPOSE

There is a lack of consensus regarding appropriate criteria attesting patients' unrestricted sports activities after ACL reconstruction. Purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review about strength deficits to find out if a strength test might be a return to play criterion.

DATA SOURCE

Pubmed central, Google Scholar.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

English language articles.

INTERVENTIONS

Strength tests after ACL reconstruction with autologous tendon grafts.

METHODS

A systematic search for articles about muscle strength after ACL reconstruction was performed.

RESULTS

Forty-five articles could be identified. All articles identified reported strength deficits after ACL reconstruction in comparison to control subjects. Some of these deficits persisted up to 5 years after surgery. Knee flexor strength is more impaired after ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts and quadriceps strength after BPTB ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Strength deficits of hip, knee and ankle muscles are reported after ACL reconstruction. Muscular strength test may be an important tool to determine if an athlete can return to competitive sports after ACL reconstruction.

Femoral fixation of hamstring tendon grafts in ACL reconstructions: the 2-year follow-up results of a prospective randomized controlled study

PURPOSE

Hamstring tendon grafts are commonly used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. A number of fixation devices are available; however, several have limited clinical support. To our knowledge, no randomized controlled study comparing the EZLoc and the Bone Mulch Screw for femoral fixation in ACL reconstruction exists. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the results following the use of these two femoral fixation devices. Time in surgery for the two methods was also to be compared.

METHODS

A total of 110 patients between 18 and 45 years old at two orthopaedic departments, A (n = 55) and B (n = 55), were randomized to ACL reconstruction with femoral fixation of the hamstring graft with either the EZLoc or the Bone Mulch Screw. Surgical time was measured for each group. The patients were evaluated after 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The clinical examination included range of motion, evaluation of intraarticular swelling, tenderness at the lateral femoral condyle, the Lachman test, the Pivot shift test and the KT-1000 arthrometer. In addition, the visual analogue scale score for pain, the Tegner activity score, the Lysholm functional score and the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score were recorded. Knee extension and flexion muscle strength were also measured with a Biodex.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in any of the parameters mentioned above at the 2-year follow-up evaluation. Three patients in each group underwent revision ACL reconstruction during the study. More than 95% of the knees in both groups were found to be stable. Good to excellent results were found for all selected knee scores in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in any of the muscle strength parameters. Time in surgery was statistically significantly shorter in the EZLoc group compared with the Bone Mulch group.

CONCLUSION

There were no statistically significant differences in clinical findings, knee scores or in muscle strength between the EZLoc group and the Bone Mulch group at the 2-year follow-up evaluation. Time in surgery was statistically significantly shorter for patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts when the EZLoc femoral fixation device was used.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Knee flexor strength and endurance profiles after ipsilateral hamstring tendons anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

To profile knee flexor strength and endurance responses to ipsilateral hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients, and to describe knee flexor strength and endurance as predictors of subjective outcomes. The hypothesis was that the involved leg would demonstrate deficits compared with uninvolved and matched legs.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Controlled laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Women (n=15; mean age, 20.47±1.96y; height, 1.69±.08m; weight, 68.51±12.64kg), who were a mean ± SD of 25.93±11.25 months postsurgery, were matched to 15 sex-matched controls (mean age, 20.93±1.22y; height, 1.65±.06m; weight, 66.52±10.69kg).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Concentric peak flexor moment over the entire isokinetic joint range of motion, peak flexor moment at 105° of joint flexion, and knee flexor total work, normalized to body mass, and subjective questionnaire scores for the involved leg.

RESULTS

Significantly lesser peak flexor moment over the entire isokinetic joint range of motion (P=.034) and total work (P=.048) existed for the involved leg (.959±.186Nm/kg; 21.933±5.881J/kg) compared with the matched leg (1.108±.134Nm/kg; 27.431±6.499J/kg). Significantly lesser peak flexor moment at 105° of joint flexion (P=.002) existed between the involved (.221±.116Nm/kg) and uninvolved (.40±.234Nm/kg) and matched (.475±.183Nm/kg) legs. Significantly greater strength deficits (P≤.001) existed at peak flexor moment at 105° of joint flexion compared with peak flexor moment over the entire isokinetic joint range of motion for side (53.83%±38.8%; 9.87%±10.77%) and group (77.61%±44.14%; 18.09%±11.73%) differences. Peak flexor moment at 105° of joint flexion was a significant predictor of subjective pain (P=.007), symptoms (P=.006), function (P=.011), and sports (P=.022) outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Knee flexor strength and endurance deficits suggest susceptibility to reinjury, and strength in a deep joint angle predicts subjective outcomes.

Nerve injury during hamstring graft harvest: a prospective comparative study of three different incisions

PURPOSE

To compare the incidence, extent of sensory loss, its clinical effect and natural course caused by three different skin incisions used for autogenous hamstring graft harvest during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients who underwent hamstring graft harvest during ACL reconstruction, participated in the study. All patients were randomized into 3 groups as per the 3 incisions used-vertical, transverse and oblique. The area of sensory loss was documented as per anatomical distribution of the infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve (IPSBN) and sartorial branch of sensory nerve (SBSN) at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months follow-ups. The length of incision, area of sensory loss and subjective pain score (out of 10) were also noted.

RESULTS

The incidence, area of hypesthesia and persistence at 6 months were significantly higher with vertical incision at all times, whereas it was the least with oblique incision. Injury to IPSBN was maximum with vertical incision (p = 0.000), and it was similar in the transverse and oblique incision groups. The SBSN injury incidence was not significantly different between the three groups (n.s.). Subjective cutaneous hypesthesia incidence was quite low in all the three groups. The oblique incision group had highest subjective satisfaction closely followed by the horizontal incision group.

CONCLUSIONS

Vertical incision has highest incidence of IPBSN injury, persistent hypesthesia, largest area of sensory loss and poorest subjective outcome. Oblique and transverse incision groups had statistically comparable results, though better outcome was noted in the oblique incision group. The SBSN injury was equally common in all the three incisions used. However, the sensory loss does not impair normal daily activities in the patients. We recommend use of oblique incision for hamstring graft harvest.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic randomized controlled prospective study, level I.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autografts compared with non-irradiated, non-chemically treated allografts

PURPOSE

Allograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction obviates donor site morbidity and may accelerate postoperative recovery. However, allograft use can lead to increased rates of surgical failure, particularly when chemical processing or irradiation is used. Few studies have rigorously evaluated the comparative outcomes of autografts and fresh-frozen allograft tissue for ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search to identify and systematically evaluate outcomes of autograft and non-chemically treated non-irradiated allograft tissue in ACL reconstruction between 1980 and 2012. We included studies with Level of evidence of I to III, determinate graft treatment, a minimum of 25 patients per treatment arm, a minimum 2-year follow-up, and selected subjective and objective outcome measures.

RESULTS

After the exclusion of 585 citations, we isolated 11 studies for further review. All patients showed improvement in clinical outcome measures and knee stability end points from injury to definitive surgical management. No statistically significant differences were detected between autografts and non-chemically processed non-irradiated allografts in Lysholm scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Lachman examinations, pivot-shift testing, KT-1000 measurements, or failure rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Further large-scale, well-designed studies are required to better evaluate the comparative outcomes after fresh-frozen allograft ACL reconstruction. The current study suggests that the results after autograft ACL reconstruction are comparable to those using non-chemically processed nonirradiated allograft tissue.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of Level I to III studies.

Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in active young men using bone-tendon achilles allograft versus free tendon achilles allograft

PURPOSE

The purpose was to prospectively compare the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using bone-tendon Achilles allograft with those of free tendon Achilles allograft in 2 groups of active young men.

METHODS

We enrolled 72 subjects in the study. Of these, 33 subjects who had ACL reconstruction with Achilles allograft with calcaneal bone block on its end (group I) and 34 who had ACL reconstruction with free tendon Achilles allograft (group II) were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. The Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and 1-leg hop test were evaluated at the last follow-up. The International Knee Documentation Committee classification, Lysholm score, and side-to-side difference were assessed preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The Tegner activity scale was evaluated before injury and at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 30.9 months (range, 26 to 38 months). At the last follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, 1-leg hop test, International Knee Documentation Committee classification, Lysholm score, and side-to-side difference (P > .05). Three subjects in group I and three in group II showed an activity level 2 steps below the preinjury activity level. The rest of the subjects returned to the preinjury activity level or showed a level 1 step below the preinjury activity level.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes of ACL reconstructions using Achilles allograft between the bone-tendon group and the free tendon group in active young men. Free tendon Achilles allograft may be considered an option for ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study, randomized controlled trial.

Regeneration of hamstring tendons after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Primary aim of the study was analysis of hamstring tendon regeneration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Secondary aim was analysis of isokinetic muscle strength in relation to hamstring regeneration. The hypothesis was that regeneration of hamstring tendons after ACLR occurs and that regenerated hamstring tendons contribute to isokinetic hamstring strength with regeneration distal to the knee joint line.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients scheduled for ACLR underwent prospective MRI analysis of both legs. MRI parameters were tendon regeneration and morphology, muscle retraction and muscle cross-sectional area. A double-blind, prospective analysis of isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings strength was performed.

RESULTS

Regeneration of the gracilis tendon after ACLR occurred in all patients. Regeneration of the semitendinosus tendon occurred in 14 patients. At 1 year, the surface area of the semitendinosus and gracilis muscle decreased compared to both preoperatively (P < 0.01) and the contralateral leg (P < 0.01). The cross-sectional area of the semitendinosus muscle decreased in the absence of tendon regeneration (P = 0.05). The cross-sectional area of the gracilis muscle was greater in case of regeneration distal to the joint line (P = 0.01). Muscle retraction of the semitendinosus muscle was increased in case of nonregeneration (P = 0.02). There was no significant relationship between isokinetic flexion strength and tendon regeneration.

CONCLUSION

Hamstring tendons regenerated after harvest of both semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for ACLR. There was no relation between isokinetic flexion strength and tendon regeneration.