Outcome instruments for the shoulder

Risk Factors for Revision Posterior Shoulder Stabilization in Throwing Athletes

Background

Revision posterior shoulder capsulolabral repair has inferior outcomes compared with primary surgery. Risk factors for revision in throwing athletes are unknown.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to characterize the revision rate and risk factors for revision surgery in throwing athletes. It was hypothesized that female athletes and those with smaller glenoid bone width would be at higher risk for revision surgery.

Study Design

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 105 throwing athletes who underwent arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair of their throwing shoulder were reviewed at a minimum of 2-year follow-up, and patients who required a revision were compared with those who did not. Collected data compared between the revision and no-revision groups included age, sex, contact sport participation, and return to sport (RTS). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) score, stability, pain, strength, range of motion (ROM), and patient satisfaction. Radiographic parameters including glenoid bone version, cartilage version, labral version, bone width, labral width, glenoid labral version and width weight were also compared between both groups.

Results

Nine throwers required revision (8.6%) at an average of 2.8 years postoperatively. There were more female athletes in the revision than no-revision group (55.5% vs 23.4%; P = .03). There was no significant difference in age, proportion of contact athletes, rotator cuff tears, glenoid bone version, cartilage version, labral version, labral version weight, bone width, labral width, or labral width weight. Both groups had similar preoperative, postoperative, and change in ASES, KJOC, pain, strength, stability, and ROM scores. The proportion of patients with full strength and with full ROM, as well as patients who were satisfied with outcomes was similar between groups. Fewer patients in the revision group returned to sports compared with those in the no-revision group (14.3% vs 83.6%; P < .001), although return to sports at same level was not significantly different between groups (14.3% vs 37.2%; P = .41).

Conclusion

The revision rate of arthroscopic posterior shoulder stabilization in throwers was 8.6%. Female athletes were at higher risk for revision, and return to sports was lower in patients who underwent revision surgery.

Chinese version of the Rotator Cuff Quality of Life questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation in rotator cuff-impaired patients in Hong Kong

Purpose:

To adapt the Rotator Cuff Quality of Life (RC-QOL) questionnaire into traditional Chinese (Chi-RC-QOL) and to evaluate the validity and reliability in patients suffering from rotator cuff pathologies in Hong Kong.

Methods:

The Chi-RC-QOL will be constructed using the forward-translation followed by the backward-translation method. Thirty consecutive patients with clinically and radiologically confirmed rotator cuff pathology were recruited. Descriptive statistics will be followed by validity assessment using comparison with the Constant Shoulder (CS) score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Rating Scale, and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) score. Parametric data will be tested using Pearson’s correlation coefficient for the total scores. Reliability was assessed using a test–retest interval of 30 min. The Cronbach’s α and intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated.

Results:

Cronbach’s α and internal consistency scores were high for all parts of the Chi-RC-QOL, with Cronbach’s α ranging between 0.89 and 0.98. Internal consistency scores range from 0.82 to 0.92, which can be regarded as an excellent correlation. Test–retest reliability was excellent for all parts of the Chi-RC-QOL with good absolute reliability. Chi-RC-QOL correlates well with the CS score, UCLA Shoulder Rating Scale, and the WORC score, with all being statistically significant.

Conclusions:

The current study adapted the RC-QOL to traditional Chinese version. The analysis confirmed the validity and reliability of the Chi-RC-QOL questionnaire.

Level of Evidence:

III.

Assessment of cross-cultural adaptations of patient-reported shoulder outcome measures in Spanish: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to conduct a systematic review of self-administered shoulder-disability functional assessment questionnaires adapted to Spanish, analyzing the quality of the transcultural adaptation and the clinimetric properties of the new version.

METHODS

A search of the main biomedical databases was conducted to locate Spanish shoulder function assessment scales. The authors reviewed the papers and considered whether the process of adaptation of the questionnaire had followed international recommendations, and whether its psychometric properties had been appropriately assessed.

RESULTS

The search identified nine shoulder function assessment scales adapted to Spanish: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH), Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index (WORC), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index (WOSI) and Wheelchair Users Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI). The DASH was adapted on three occasions and the SPADI on two. The transcultural adaptation procedure was generally satisfactory, albeit somewhat less rigorous for the SDQ and WUSPI. Reliability was analyzed in all cases. Validity was not measured for one of the adaptations of the DASH, nor was it measured for the SDQ.

CONCLUSIONS

The transcultural adaptation was satisfactory and the psychometric properties analyzed were similar to both the original version and other versions adapted to other languages.

Convergent Validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System's Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test for the Knee and Shoulder Injury Sports Medicine Patient Population

PURPOSE

To evaluate the convergent validity, precision, and completion times for the Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test (PF-CAT) in a sports medicine patient population relative to standard measures of knee and shoulder function.

METHODS

We reviewed all patient visits from April through September 2014 with either knee or shoulder complaints from a university-based sports medicine clinic, during which PF-CAT, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) outcome scores for shoulder patients and PF-CAT, SANE, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores for knee patients were obtained, with an initial visit or one follow-up visit included in the study. Spearman correlation was used to evaluate pairwise agreement among scores. The McNemar χ² test was used to evaluate a difference in the number of times floor and ceiling values occurred. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare differences in completion times.

RESULTS

In total, 415 shoulder and 450 knee clinical evaluations qualified for inclusion in the study. A high correlation was found between IKDC and PF-CAT scores (r = 0.75, P < .0001), and a moderately high correlation was found between PF-CAT and both SST (r = 0.68, P < .0001) and ASES (r = 0.63, P < .0001) scores. Maximum differences in the sum of floor-ceiling values versus the PF-CAT were 15% for the SST (P < .0001), 2.5% for the ASES (ceiling only, P = .0133), and 5.8% for the shoulder SANE (floor P = .0012, ceiling P = .0269). The PF-CAT had values of 0.4% for the shoulder and 0.6% for the knee. Zero percent of IKDC scores but 6.9% of knee SANE scores hit floor or ceiling values (floor P = .0019, ceiling P = .0007). The PF-CAT median completion time was lower at 55 seconds versus 268 seconds for the IKDC assessment (P < .0001), whereas shoulder patients' times were 61, 139, and 116 seconds for the PF-CAT, SST, and ASES evaluation, respectively (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The PF-CAT showed a high correlation with IKDC scores and a moderately high correlation with ASES and SST outcomes. The PF-CAT takes significantly less time to complete and exhibits improved or similar floor and ceiling effects in comparison to IKDC, SST, and ASES scores. The PF-CAT can be used in evaluating sports medicine knee and shoulder patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, cross-sectional study.

A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Interference Screw and Suture Anchor Techniques for Biceps Tenodesis

BACKGROUND

Several methods are used to perform biceps tenodesis in patients with superior labrum-biceps complex (SLBC) lesions accompanied by a rotator cuff tear. However, limited clinical data are available regarding the best technique in terms of clinical and anatomic outcomes.

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical and anatomic outcomes of the interference screw (IS) and suture anchor (SA) fixation techniques for biceps tenodesis performed along with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with SLBC lesions were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided according to the tenodesis method: the IS and SA groups. Functional outcomes were evaluated with the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Constant score, Korean Shoulder Score (KSS), and long head of the biceps (LHB) score at least 2 years after surgery. The anatomic status of tenodesis was estimated using magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography, and the anatomic failure of tenodesis was determined when the biceps tendon was not traced in the intertubercular groove directly from the insertion site of the IS or SA.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients in the IS group and 34 in the SA group were monitored for more than 2 years. All postoperative functional scores improved significantly compared with the preoperative scores (all P < .001) and were not significantly different between the groups, including the LHB score (all P > .05). Nine anatomic failures of tenodesis were observed: 7 in the IS group and 2 in the SA group ( P = .083). In a multivariate analysis using logistic regression, IS fixation ( P = .003) and a higher (ie, more physically demanding) work level ( P = .022) were factors associated with the anatomic failure of tenodesis significantly. In patients with tenodesis failure, the LHB score ( P = .049) and the degree of Popeye deformity by the patient and examiner ( P = .004 and .018, respectively) were statistically different compared with patients with intact tenodeses.

CONCLUSION

Care must be taken while performing biceps tenodesis in patients with a higher work level; IS fixation appears to pose a higher risk in terms of the anatomic failure of tenodesis than SA fixation, although functional outcomes were not different.

Making the Right Treatment Decision Requires Consideration of Utility and Reconsideration of Value

To achieve a good clinical outcome, arthroscopic and related surgeons must choose the proper treatment, and the basis of this choice is accurate diagnosis. Generally, our clinical focus is on outcome, but outcome is achieved after the fact. While this seems obvious, arthroscopic and related surgeons-and our patients who participate in shared decision making-evaluate the utility, or usefulness, of potential treatments based on desired and expected benefits versus potential risks. Today, cost is frequently considered as a determinant of value in medicine and may be applied to the decision analysis, but if an individual patient perceives health to be priceless, cost becomes irrelevant. In the end, an individual patient's satisfaction is determined on a case-by-case basis. Proper choice of treatment cannot be formulaic.

Variability in Outcome Reporting for Operatively Managed Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to quantify the degree of variability in outcomes assessed after surgery for anterior shoulder instability in recent high-impact literature.

METHODS

Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, an extensive review of the literature during a 5-year period from January 2011 through December 2015 was performed across 6 orthopaedic journals with high impact factors to identify all studies investigating outcomes after anterior shoulder instability. Studies reporting clinical outcomes for patients with anterior glenohumeral instability after surgical treatment with at least 1-year follow-up were included. Several metrics were collected from each manuscript: (1) range of motion (ROM), (2) quantitative strength, (3) physical examination testing, (4) imaging, (5) patient-reported outcomes (PROs), (6) complications (including recurrent instability), (7) patient satisfaction, and (8) return to preinjury level of activity or sport. Variability in outcome measures was then qualitatively assessed.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight studies were included for final analysis ranging from Level I to IV evidence. Fifty-nine percent reported ROM, and 18% measured strength. Other clinical exam maneuvers were assessed in 44%, with 40% assessing apprehension. Imaging was used in 62%, including X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography scans. On average, 2.25 PROs were assessed. In total, 28 different PROs were used to assess outcomes. The 3 most commonly reported PROs were the Rowe scale at 46%, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index at 31%, and the Constant Shoulder Score at 26%. Twenty-five percent included patient satisfaction in their assessment of outcomes. Recurrence was assessed by 59%, and return to preinjury level of activity was reported by 37% of the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial variability in outcome reporting for high-impact anterior shoulder instability literature with 28 different outcome tools used, making it difficult to compare outcomes between studies. Agreeing upon a uniform measure to assess outcomes would allow for clearer interpretation of the literature as well as the potential to draw conclusions from pooled data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Editorial Commentary: The Medial Side of the Knee Is Amenable to Repair

Systematic review of knee medial collateral ligament (MCL) and posteromedial corner (PMC) "repair" finds low failure rates.

Prognostic Factors Affecting Rotator Cuff Healing After Arthroscopic Repair in Small to Medium-sized Tears

BACKGROUND

Small and medium-sized rotator cuff tears usually have good clinical and anatomic outcomes. However, healing failure still occurs in some cases.

PURPOSE

To evaluate prognostic factors for rotator cuff healing in patients with only small to medium-sized rotator cuff tears.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected from 339 patients with small to medium-sized rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic repair by a single surgeon between March 2004 and August 2012 and who underwent magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomographic arthrography at least 1 year after surgery. The mean age of the patients was 59.8 years (range, 39-80 years), and the mean follow-up time was 20.8 months (range, 12-66 months). The functional evaluation included the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant-Murley score, and Simple Shoulder Test.

RESULTS

Postoperative VAS for pain and functional scores improved significantly compared with preoperative values (P < .001). Forty-five healing failures occurred (13.3%), and fatty degeneration of the infraspinatus muscle, tear size (anteroposterior dimension), and age were significant factors affecting rotator cuff healing (P < .001, = .018, and = .011, respectively) in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Grade II and higher infraspinatus fatty degeneration correlated with a higher failure rate. The failure rate was also significantly higher in patients with a tear >2 cm in size (34.2%) compared with patients with a tear ≤2 cm (10.6%) (P < .001). A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the predictive cut-off value for the oldest age and the largest tear size for successful healing, which were calculated as 69 years and 2 cm, respectively, with a specificity of 90%.

CONCLUSION

In small to medium-sized rotator cuff tears, grade II fatty degeneration of the infraspinatus muscle according to the Goutallier classification could be a reference point for successful healing, and anatomic outcomes might be better if repair is performed before the patient is 69 years old and the tear size exceeds 2 cm.

The development and validation of a questionnaire for rotator cuff disorders: The Functional Shoulder Score

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to validate the Functional Shoulder Score (FSS), a new patient-reported outcome score specifically designed to evaluate patients with rotator cuff disorders.

METHODS

One hundred and nineteen patients were assessed using two shoulder scoring systems [the FSS and the Constant-Murley Score (CMS)] at 3 weeks pre- and 6 months post-arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery. The reliability, validity, responsiveness and interpretability of the FSS were evaluated.

RESULTS

Reliability analysis (test-retest) showed an intraclass correlation coefficient value of 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.92 to 0.98]. Internal consistency analysis revealed a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.93. The Pearson correlation coefficient FSS-CMS was 0.782 pre-operatively and 0.737 postoperatively (p < 0.0005). There was a statistically significant increase in FSS scores postoperatively, an effect size of 3.06 and standardized response mean of 2.80. The value for minimal detectable change was ±8.38 scale points (based on a 90% CI) and the minimal clinically important difference for improvement was 24.7 ± 5.4 points.

CONCLUSIONS

The FSS is a patient-reported outcome measure that can easily be incorporated into clinical practice, providing a quick, reliable, valid and practical measure for rotator cuff problems. The questionnaire is highly sensitive to clinical change.