Biomechanical and Biological Findings Between Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without an Augmented Remnant Repair: A Comparative in Vivo Animal Study

Anterior cruciate ligament remnant preservation attenuates apoptosis and enhances the regeneration of hamstring tendon graft

AIMS

The effects of remnant preservation on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and its relationship with the tendon graft remain unclear. We hypothesized that the co-culture of remnant cells and bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) decreases apoptosis and enhances the activity of the hamstring tendons and tenocytes, thus aiding ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

The ACL remnant, bone marrow, and hamstring tendons were surgically harvested from rabbits. The apoptosis rate, cell proliferation, and expression of types I and III collagen, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and tenogenic genes (scleraxis (SCX), tenascin C (TNC), and tenomodulin (TNMD)) of the hamstring tendons were compared between the co-culture medium (ACL remnant cells (ACLRCs) and BMSCs co-culture) and control medium (BMSCs-only culture). We also evaluated the apoptosis, cell proliferation, migration, and gene expression of hamstring tenocytes with exposure to co-culture and control media.

RESULTS

Compared to BMSCs-only culture medium, the co-culture medium showed substantially decreased early and late apoptosis rates, attenuation of intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways, and enhanced proliferation of the hamstring tendons and tenocytes. In addition, the expression of collagen synthesis, TGF-β, VEGF, and tenogenic genes in the hamstring tendons and tenocytes significantly increased in the co-culture medium compared to that in the control medium.

CONCLUSION

In the presence of ACLRCs and BMSCs, the hamstring tendons and tenocytes significantly attenuated apoptosis and enhanced the expression of collagen synthesis, TGF-β, VEGF, and tenogenic genes. This in vitro study suggests that the ACLRCs mixed with BMSCs could aid regeneration of the hamstring tendon graft during ACL reconstruction.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(1):9-21.

Ligamentization and Remnant Integration: Review and Analysis of Current Evidence and Implications for Scapholunate Reconstruction

Background  Scapholunate interosseous ligament injuries are common but remain a therapeutic challenge. Current treatment modalities prioritize restoration of normal anatomy with reconstruction where appropriate. To date no reconstructive technique has been described that discusses the potential benefit of preservation of the scapholunate ligament remnant. Little is known about the "ligamentization" of grafts within the wrist. However, a growing body of knee literature suggests that remnant sparing may confer some benefit. In the absence of wrist specific studies, this literature must guide areas for potential augmentation of current surgical practices. Objective  The purpose of this study was to perform a review of the process of ligamentization and a systematic review of the current literature on the possible role of ligament sparring and its effect on ligamentization. Methods  A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify all the studies related to remnant sparing and the ligamentization of reconstructed tendons, regardless of graft type or joint involved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed until February 1, 2016 using the following keywords: ligamentization, graft, remodelling, reconstruction, biomechan*, histolo∗, scapholunate ligament. Each selected study was evaluated for methodological quality and risk of bias according to a modified Systematic Review Center for Laboratory Animal Experimentation criteria. Conclusions  The available literature suggests that ligament sparring demonstrated a trend toward improvements in vascularity, mechanoreceptors, and biomechanics that lessens in significance over time. Clinical Relevance  This review suggests that remnant sparing may be one way to improve outcomes of scapholunate ligament reconstructive surgery. Level of Evidence  This is a level I/II, review study.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Is Biological Augmentation Beneficial?

Surgical reconstruction in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures has proven to be a highly effective technique that usually provides satisfactory results. However, despite the majority of patients recovering their function after this procedure, ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is still imperfect. To improve these results, various biological augmentation (BA) techniques have been employed mostly in animal models. They include: (1) growth factors (bone morphogenetic protein, epidermal growth factor, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, transforming growth factor-β, hepatocyte growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and platelet concentrates such as platelet-rich plasma, fibrin clot, and autologous conditioned serum), (2) mesenchymal stem cells, (3) autologous tissue, (4) various pharmaceuticals (matrix metalloproteinase-inhibitor alpha-2-macroglobulin bisphosphonates), (5) biophysical/environmental methods (hyperbaric oxygen, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound, extracorporeal shockwave therapy), (6) biomaterials (fixation methods, biological coatings, biosynthetic bone substitutes, osteoconductive materials), and (7) gene therapy. All of them have shown good results in experimental studies; however, the clinical studies on BA published so far are highly heterogeneous and have a low degree of evidence. The most widely used technique to date is platelet-rich plasma. My position is that orthopedic surgeons must be very cautious when considering using PRP or other BA methods in ACLR.

Effect of Remnant Tissues on Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at Follow-up Arthroscopy

BACKGROUND

Remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is sought to enhance vascularization and maturation of a graft and to produce positive clinical outcomes after reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate an effect of remnant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tissues on outcomes of ACLR 1 year after reconstruction in younger populations.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Inpatient orthopedic surgical and rehabilitation clinic.

SUBJECTS

The subjects were 644 patients who underwent primary ACLR.

INDEPENDENT VARIABLES

The independent variables were age, height, and body weight of the subjects, and the presence of remnant tissue.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measure was the number of subjects with secondary infra-articular injuries at a follow-up arthroscopy after ACLR. The odds ratio was calculated and compared between the remnant-preserving ACLR (ACLR-P) and remnant-resecting (ACLR-R) groups to investigate the effect of remnant tissues on postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 416 cases met our inclusion criteria and were included in this study. There were 136 cases (49 males and 87 females) in the ACLR-P group with the mean age (±SD) of 17.86 ± 2.85 years. There were 280 cases (106 males and 174 females) in the ACLR-R group, and the mean age (±SD) was 18.13 ± 2.73 years. Of 136 cases in the ALCR-P group, 54 (39.7%) had abnormal arthroscopic findings that lead to a surgical intervention. Of 280 patients in the ACLR-R group, 128 (45.7%) had abnormal findings. Odds ratio was 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51-1.18; P = 0.24]. Four cases in the ACLR-P group and 8 in the ACLR-R group were diagnosed with ACL retear during follow-up arthroscopy. Odds ratio was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.30-3.48; P = 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of ACL remnant tissues did not have a significant effect on outcomes 1 year after reconstruction. However, there was a trend that lower percentage of patients with remnant-preserving ALCR had abnormal arthroscopic findings that lead to a surgical treatment at follow-up arthroscopy 1 year after initial reconstruction. The presence of remnant tissues did not have a significant effect on retear rate.

Anterior cruciate ligament remnant-preserving and re-tensioning reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison study of three different re-tensioning methods in a porcine model

BACKGROUND

With the developments in the arthroscopic technique, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnant-preserving reconstruction is gradually gaining attention with respect to improving proprioception and enhancing early revascularization of the graft. To evaluate the mechanical pull-out strength of three different methods for remnant-preserving and re-tensioning reconstruction during ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

Twenty-seven fresh knees from mature pigs were used in this study. Each knee was dissected to isolate the femoral attachment of ACL and cut the attachment. An MTS tensile testing machine with dual-screw fixation clamp with 30° flexion angle was used. The 27 specimens were tested after applying re-tensioning sutures with No. 0 polydioxanone (PDS), using the single stitch (n = 9), loop stitch (n = 9), and triple stitch (n = 9) methods. We measured the mode of failure, defined as (1) ligament failure (longitudinal splitting of the remnant ACL) or (2) suture failure (tearing of the PDS stitch); load-to-failure strength; and stiffness for the three methods. Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare the variance of load-to-failure strength and stiffness among the three groups.

RESULTS

Ligament failure occurred in all cases in the single stitch group and in all but one case in the triple stitch group. Suture failure occurred in all cases in the loop stitch group and in one case in the triple stitch group. The load-to-failure strength was significantly higher with loop stich (91.52 ± 8.19 N) and triple stitch (111.1 ± 18.15 N) than with single stitch (43.79 ± 11.54 N) (p = 0.002). With respect to stiffness, triple stitch (2.50 ± 0.37 N/mm) yielded significantly higher stiffness than the other methods (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested that loop stitch or triple stitch would be a better option for increasing the mechanical strength when applying remnant-preserving and re-tensioning reconstruction during ACL reconstruction.

Remnant-Tensioning Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Provides Comparable Stability to and Better Graft Vascularity Than Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Acute or Subacute Injury: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical, second-look arthroscopic, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) findings between remnant-tensioning single-bundle (RT-SB) and double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with acute or subacute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury were randomized to undergo RT-SB or DB ACLR. Twenty-six patients in the RT-SB group and 28 in the DB group were evaluated using stability tests (Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-2000 arthrometer) and multiple clinical scores. One year postoperatively, all 54 patients underwent MRI for evaluation of graft continuity and graft signal/noise quotient and DCE-MRI for the calculation of normalized area under the curve (nAUC) as a marker of graft vascularity. Among them, 41 patients underwent second-look arthroscopy for the evaluation of graft continuity, graft tension, and synovialization. The results were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

At the minimum 2-year follow-up (28.7 ± 6.4 months), the stability tests, clinical scores, second-look arthroscopic findings, and MRI findings were not significantly different between the groups. However, the mean nAUC values on DCE-MRI for the ACL graft were significantly higher in the RT-SB group than those in the DB group in all 3 zones (nAUC_proximal, P = .005; nAUC_middle, P = .021; nAUC_distal, P = .027; and nAUC_average, P = .008).

CONCLUSION

For acute or subacute ACL injury, the RT-SB ACLR showed an outcome comparable to that of DB ACLR in terms of knee stability, clinical scores, MRI findings, and second-look arthroscopic findings. Moreover, RT-SB ACLR showed better graft vascularity 1 year postoperatively than DB ACLR using DCE-MRI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, prospective randomized controlled trial.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: Historical Perspective, Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair was first reported in 1895 by Sir Arthur Mayo-Robson. Open primary ACL repair was performed throughout the 1970s and 1980s; however, rerupture rates were as high as 50% at mid-term follow-up. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, synthetic graft materials received consideration; however, the outcomes were abysmal. Recently, with a better understanding of ACL healing and improvement in technique, there has been renewed interest in ACL repair. The potential advantages of ACL repair include improvements in knee kinematics and proprioception, avoiding graft harvest, and preserving bone stock. Although recent data on short-term outcomes suggest potential in properly indicated patients, medium- and long-term outcomes are largely unknown. ACL repair has the greatest potential in cases of proximal ACL rupture (modified Sherman type I and II proximal tears). Repair of midsubstance tears (modified Sherman type III tears) should be avoided. Caution is advised in athletes and younger patients because of higher failure rates. Today, ACL repair remains controversial and should be performed with caution because of limited medium- and long-term outcomes.

The effect of thermosensitive hydrogel platelet-rich-plasma complex in the treatment of partial tear of anterior cruciate ligament in rat model

Background/Objective

The treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) partial tear is controversial. The reconstructive surgery is invasive while the prevalence of subsequent insufficiency after conservative treatment has been reported to range from 11% to 62%. Therefore, a new method that promotes tissue regeneration is needed. The aim of this study was to observe the healing of ACL partial tear biomechanically and histologically after the administration of a thermosensitive hydrogel platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) complex.

Methods

The complex was prepared according to a previously published protocol. One hundred and fifty 12-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were included and they were allocated into 4 groups. Lesion control group (Group 1), treatment group (Group 2), gel-only group (Group 3) and intact group (Group 4). Biomechanical testing, histological analysis (H&E and immunohistochemical staining) and scoring was performed.

Results

On gross observation, the treatment group showed a continuous ACL with slightly thickened synovium or a partially healed ACL at 6-week follow up. In the biomechanical testing at 6 weeks after surgery, the failure load of the treatment group was significantly superior when compared with the lesion control group (52.7±10.8N vs. 41.6±7.8N, p<0.01), but the failure load was not restored to level of the intact group (52.7±10.8N vs. 61.5±9.1N, p=0.037). The maturity index of wound sites showed no significant inter-group differences at any timepoints. However, an increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and pro-collagen I was detected.

Conclusion

The thermosensitive hydrogel-PRP was shown to be effective in enhancing the healing of ACL partial tear in the rat model, and potentially this complex can be used as a treatment for patients with ACL partial tear.

The translational potential of this article

The thermosensitive hydrogel-PRP is potentially translated to clinical use to treat patients with ACL partial tear by injection under arthroscopy or ultrasound guiding.

Extracorporeal shock wave promotes activation of anterior cruciate ligament remnant cells and their paracrine regulation of bone marrow stromal cells' proliferation, migration, collagen synthesis, and differentiation

Aims

Proliferation, migration, and differentiation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnant and surrounding cells are fundamental processes for ACL reconstruction; however, the interaction between ACL remnant and surrounding cells is unclear. We hypothesized that ACL remnant cells preserve the capability to regulate the surrounding cells' activity, collagen gene expression, and tenogenic differentiation. Moreover, extracorporeal shock wave (ESW) would not only promote activity of ACL remnant cells, but also enhance their paracrine regulation of surrounding cells.

Methods

Cell viability, proliferation, migration, and expression levels of Collagen-I (COL-I) A1, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were compared between ACL remnant cells untreated and treated with ESW (0.15 mJ/mm², 1,000 impulses, 4 Hz). To evaluate the subsequent effects on the surrounding cells, bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs)' viability, proliferation, migration, and levels of Type I Collagen, Type III Collagen, and tenogenic gene (Scx, TNC) expression were investigated using coculture system.

Results

ESW-treated ACL remnant cells presented higher cell viability, proliferation, migration, and increased expression of COL-I A1, TGF-β, and VEGF. BMSC proliferation and migration rate significantly increased after coculture with ACL remnant cells with and without ESW stimulation compared to the BMSCs alone group. Furthermore, ESW significantly enhanced ACL remnant cells' capability to upregulate the collagen gene expression and tenogenic differentiation of BMSCs, without affecting cell viability, TGF-β, and VEGF expression.

Conclusion

ACL remnant cells modulated activity and differentiation of surrounding cells. The results indicated that ESW enhanced ACL remnant cells viability, proliferation, migration, and expression of collagen, TGF-β, VEGF, and paracrine regulation of BMSC proliferation, migration, collagen expression, and tenogenesis.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(8):458-468.

The effect of interleukin-8 in the early stage after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation

PURPOSE

We studied the effect of interleukin-8 (IL-8) as the factor for angiogenesis in the joint fluid of remnant-preserved anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (RP-ACLR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We measured 12 cytokines in joint fluid by multiplex assay and assessed the relationship between IL-8 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentrations. The signal intensity and mean sagittal diameter via postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were evaluated and the stress X-ray image was analyzed at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation.

RESULTS

The IL-8 concentration was highest 3 months postoperatively in those patients who underwent RP-ACLR. Clinical data also showed that the signal intensity and stress radiography of the knee graft were significantly better at the early postoperative stage.

DISCUSSION

Our results show that IL-8 plays an important role in angiogenesis within 3 months after RP-ACLR. This effect yields better recovery after operation. RP-ACLR patients with high knee stability in clinical data were identical to those with high expression of IL-8 in experimental data. Therefore, IL-8 has been shown to help revascularization and ligamentization of the grafted tendon. These results indicate that IL-8 in RP-ACLR is an important factor for angiogenesis after operation. Unfortunately, the relationship of IL-8 and VEGF in vivo has not been studied.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that the IL-8 concentration was very high within 3 months after RP-ACLR operation. The increase in concentration of IL-8 over time was consistent with the increase in VEGF concentration. In the IL-8 clinical setting, MRI analysis showed that ACL synovialization and tension were better in patients who underwent the remnant preservation method. In addition, it was shown that RP-ACLR may be advantageous for early anterior stability within 1 year post operation and beneficial for tendon graft in the early stage post operation. Taken together, our findings suggest that IL-8 may contribute to angiogenesis which is helpful for revascularization and ligamentization of the graft tendon in the early stages of RP-ACLR.

Biological augmentation of graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review

Aims

The success of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) depends on osseointegration at the graft-tunnel interface and intra-articular ligamentization. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review of clinical and preclinical studies that evaluated biological augmentation of graft healing in ACLR.

Materials and Methods

In all, 1879 studies were identified across three databases. Following assessment against strict criteria, 112 studies were included (20 clinical studies; 92 animal studies).

Results

Seven categories of biological interventions were identified: growth factors, biomaterials, stem cells, gene therapy, autologous tissue, biophysical/environmental, and pharmaceuticals. The methodological quality of animal studies was moderate in 97%, but only 10% used clinically relevant outcome measures. The most interventions in clinical trials target the graft-tunnel interface and are applied intraoperatively. Platelet-rich plasma is the most studied intervention, but the clinical outcomes are mixed, and the methodological quality of studies was suboptimal. Other biological therapies investigated in clinical trials include: remnant-augmented ACLR; bone substitutes; calcium phosphate-hybridized grafts; extracorporeal shockwave therapy; and adult autologus non-cultivated stem cells.

Conclusion

There is extensive preclinical research supporting the use of biological therapies to augment ACLR. Further clinical studies that meet the minimum standards of reporting are required to determine whether emerging biological strategies will provide tangible benefits in patients undergoing ACLR. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:271-84.

Is Remnant Preservation Truly Beneficial to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Healing? Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluations of Remnant-Preserved Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Remnant-preserved anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction was introduced to improve clinical outcomes and biological healing. However, the effects of remnant preservation and the influence of the delay from injury until reconstruction on the outcomes of this technique are still uncertain. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purposes of this study were to evaluate whether remnant preservation improved the clinical outcomes and graft incorporation of ACL reconstruction and to examine the influence of the delay between ACL injury and reconstruction on the usefulness of remnant preservation. We hypothesized that remnant preservation improves clinical results and accelerates graft incorporation and that its effect is dependent on the delay between ACL injury and reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 151 consecutive patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a semitendinosus graft were enrolled in this study: 74 knees underwent ACL reconstruction without a remnant (or the remnant was <25% of the intra-articular portion of the graft; NR group), while 77 knees underwent ACL reconstruction with remnant preservation (RP group). These were divided into 4 subgroups based on the time from injury to surgery: phase 1 was <3 weeks (n = 24), phase 2 was 3 to less than 8 weeks (n = 70), phase 3 was 8 to 20 weeks (n = 32), and phase 4 was >20 weeks (n = 25). Clinical measurements, including KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side anterior tibial translation measurements, were assessed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after reconstruction. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluations of graft maturation and graft-tunnel integration of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months after reconstruction.

RESULTS

There was no difference in side-to-side anterior tibial translation between the NR and RP groups. There was also no difference in graft maturation between the 2 groups. Furthermore, the time from ACL injury until reconstruction did not affect graft maturation, except in the case of very long delays before reconstruction (phase 4). Graft-tunnel integration was significantly increased in both groups in a time-dependent manner. However, there was no difference between the NR and RP groups.

CONCLUSION

Remnant preservation did not improve knee stability at 2 years after ACL reconstruction. Furthermore, remnant preservation did not accelerate graft incorporation, especially during the acute and subacute injury phases.

What Role Does Low Bone Mineral Density Play in the "Killer Turn" Effect after Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

OBJECTIVE

To explore the mechanism of the "killer turn", which is reported to be a reason for postoperative residual laxity after transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, in a low bone mineral density (BMD) condition.

METHODS

A total of 80 skeletally mature female New Zealand white rabbits were included for biomechanical evaluation after transtibial PCL reconstructions. The subjects were equally divided into low BMD (n = 40) and control groups (n = 40). Rabbits in the low BMD group were treated with surgery and drug injection to establish an osteoporotic model. Rabbits in the control group received sham surgeries and no injection. All assignments were conducted randomly according to random numbers generated by a computer. All grafts were then subjected to biomechanical testing with an MTS model-858 Mini Bionix servohydraulic materials testing machine (MTS Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA). The experimental outcomes were the increment of total graft displacement, tunnel inlet enlargement, graft elongation, stiffness and failure load of the two groups, and the comparison between them.

RESULTS

Among the 80 subjects, 1 subject of the low BMD group failed at the 30th cycle by proximal tibial fracture and 1 subject of the control group failed at the 20th cycle for the same reason. As a result, 39 subjects of the low BMD group and 39 subjects of the control group survived the cyclic loading test. Compared with the control group, the low BMD group demonstrated significantly larger total graft displacement ( P = 0.006) and tunnel inlet enlargement ( P = 0.041) than the control group. The number of subjects with less than 10% enlargement was significantly greater (57.1%) in the control group than in the low BMD group ( P = 0.004). In the load-to-failure test, 26 (66.7%) subjects in the low BMD group failed by proximal tibial fracture (around the tunnel), 6 (15.4%) at the mounting site, 5 (12.8%) at the fixation site, and only 2 (5.1%) failed at the "killer turn." In the control group, 20 (51.3%) failed at the "killer turn," 9 (23.1%) at the proximal tibia (around the tunnel), 5 (12.8%) at the mounting site, and 5 (12.8%) at the fixation site. There were significantly fewer failures (10.0%) at the "killer turn" ( P = 0.000) and 155.6% more for the para-tunnel fracture ( P = 0.000) in the low BMD group compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The low BMD group demonstrated an inferior biomechanical outcome to the control group with the transtibial technique. With low BMD, the "killer turn" effect compromises the posterior tibial cortex by enlarging the tunnel inlet.

Anterior cruciate ligament remnant and its values for preservation

Controversy surrounds the remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Advantages of remnant preservation have been reported in regard to better healing and knee function, although no consensus has been reached. This review article discussed the value and meaning of anterior cruciate ligament remnant preservation in several sections such as effects on healing, remnant classification, biomechanical evaluation, relation to proprioception, animal studies, and clinical studies. We hope that this review will facilitate further discussion and investigation for better treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. So far, the current reviews have not provided sufficient scientific evidence to support the value of preserving the remnant.

A Comparative Animal Study of Tendon Grafts Healing After Remnant-Preserving Versus Conventional Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to determine if anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by remnant preservation promotes cell proliferation, vascularization, proprioception recovery, and improved biomechanical properties of the tendon grafts. MATERIAL AND METHODS 75 New Zealand rabbits were randomly assigned into the control group (group A), conventional ACL reconstruction group (group B), ACL reconstruction using remnant preservation and graft through remnant sleeve technique group (group C), and ACL reconstruction using remnant preservation and remnant tensioning technique group (group D). The remnant and healing of tendon grafts in groups C and D were observed at 3, 6, and 12 weeks after surgery, and the mRNA expression levels of VEGF, NT-3 and GAP-43 in ACL (group A) or tendon graft samples (groups B, C, and D) were determined by real-time PCR. Tendon graft cell count, microvessel density (MVD), and proprioceptors were determined by H&E staining, CD34, and S-100 immunohistochemical staining. The biomechanical properties of the tendon graft at week 12 in groups B, C, and D were examined by using a tensile strength test. RESULTS Remnant and tendon grafts were not healed at 3, 6, and 12 weeks after the operation in groups C and D. VEGF, NT-3, and GAP-43 mRNA expressions in groups B, C, and D were higher than those in group A (P<0.05), but no significant difference was observed between groups B, C, and D (P>0.05). Furthermore, tendon graft cell count, MVD, proprioception, and biomechanical properties showed no significant differences (P>0.05) among groups B, C, and D at various time points. CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference in cell proliferation, vascularization, proprioception recovery, or biomechanical properties of the tendon grafts between remnant-preserving and conventional ACL reconstruction methods.

Editorial Commentary: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnant: What to Do With It?

There is considerable current controversy regarding surgical techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Yet despite constant evolution, clinical outcomes have changed very little. Subtle changes in surgical techniques are unlikely to have material impacts on patient-reported outcomes.