Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale

Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS)

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to translate and validate the Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS) in Iran.

METHODS

Following standard forward and backward translation procedure, content and face validity were tested by specialists and a sample of 32 patients. Then, in a cross sectional study, a sample of patients with knee disorders, recruited through simple sampling, completed the KOS-ADLS and the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) in their first visit to physiotherapy clinics in Tehran. Regarding construct validity, the Spearman's correlation (rs) and one-way ANOVA were employed to evaluate the correlations between the Persian KOS-ADLS and SF-36 subscales (convergent validity) and known groups comparison, respectively. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Cronbach's α coefficient.

RESULTS

In total 101 patients were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 42.39 (SD = 9.2). The finding indicated that the KOS-ADLS had strong correlations with SF-36 physical functioning, bodily pain subscales, and also physical component summary while it had lower correlations with other subscales of the SF-36 as expected. The KOS-ADLS was able to differentiate between the subgroups of patients who differed in BMI. The acceptable level of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.91) and Cronbach's α coefficient (α = 0.91) was obtained for the Persian KOS-ADLS. Also no floor and ceiling effects were observed for the questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

The Persian version of KOS-ADLS was found to be a reliable and valid outcome measure for assessing daily living activities in patients who suffer from knee pathological conditions.

What Are Culturally Relevant Activities of Daily Living in the Asian-Indian Population? A Survey of 402 Patients With Knee Pain

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures are essential tools in assessing clinical outcomes. Although several patient-reported outcome measures such as the Oxford Knee Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score have been developed and validated, their applicability in the Asian-Indian population may be limited; key cultural differences including varying functional demands, ethnicity-specific necessities, and social expectations represent a unique collection of needs. Such differences include preferences toward ground-level activities and those favoring the manual completion of tasks.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Which activities of daily living (ADLs) do patients in an Asian-Indian population consider the most important? (2) How do the categories of ADLs (personal care, household, work, travel, and recreation) vary among patients of different gender (men and women) and age (< 60 and > 60 years) groups?

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in October 2019 at a hospital in Mumbai, India. We developed a questionnaire with five domains for physical activity (personal care, household, work, travel, and recreation) formulated from a review and modification of existing categories identified by the WHO and the American Heart Association. Forty key ADLs were identified according to input obtained from detailed interviews of healthcare providers involved in the care of patients with orthopaedic illness, based on established domains. Respondents were instructed to identify the ADLs that were the most relevant to their lifestyle and culture. Responses from 402 patients (mean age 60 ± 12 years; 51% [206 of 402] were women) were analyzed to identify the most commonly selected ADLs. Responses were further evaluated to understand the impact of gender and age on these preferences by comparing men and women, as well as younger (age < 60 years) and older (age > 60 years) patients.

RESULTS

The three most frequently reported ADLs in each domain, representing the ADLs that were the most important to the Asian-Indian population, were standing without assistance (82% [331 of 402]), getting up with support (81% [324 of 402]), and toilet use (74% [298 of 402]) in the personal activity category; climbing stairs (80% [322 of 402]), sitting cross-legged (80% [320 of 402]), and praying (79% [319 of 402]) in the household activity category; going to the market (72% [291 of 402]), long-distance walking (62% [250 of 402]), and carrying a shopping bag (60% [242 of 402]) in the work activity category; walking on an uneven surface (66% [266 of 402]), using a taxi (61% [247 of 402]), and traveling by train (59% [239 of 402]) in the travel activity category; and yoga (67% [269 of 402]), playing with children (66% [264 of 402]), and indoor games (63% [252 of 402]) in the recreational activity category. The order of importance of ADL domains was identical in the men versus women groups as well as in the younger age versus older age groups; ADL domains with the highest number of selected ADLs in order of decreasing importance were household care, personal care, work, travel, and recreation when analyzed by individual gender and age groups. Women were more likely than men to report the following ADLs as being important: climbing stairs (84% [172 of 206] of women and 77% [150 of 196] of men), getting up without support (83% [171 of 206] of women and 78% [153 of 196] of men), going to the market (74% [152 of 206] of women and 71% [139 of 196] of men), walking on uneven surfaces (67% [139 of 206] of women and 65% [127 of 196] of men), and playing with children (72% [148 of 206] of women and 59% [116 of 196] of men).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study aim to help providers engage in personalized and socioculturally relevant discussions about knee arthritis. Highlighted areas of importance may facilitate a more comprehensive preoperative discussion of total joint arthroplasty expectations in the context of the needs and demands of Asian-Indian patients. The findings of this study could establish the groundwork for the development of ethnicity-specific patient-reported outcome measures by incorporating the identified ADLs in novel metrics with validation of face and content validity.Level of Evidence Level III, prognostic study.

Validation of the Polish Version of Knee Outcome Survey Activities of the Daily Living Scale in a Group of Patients after Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Polish version of Knee Outcome Survey Activities of the Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS) in a group of patients after arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

METHODS

The study was a longitudinal study with repeated measures. One hundred and twelve subjects who qualified for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction (mean age = 31.8 years) were initially enrolled in this study. The Polish version of KOS-ADLS and Short Form-36 v. 2.0 (SF-36) were used.

RESULTS

The Polish version of KOS-ADLS in subjects after ACL rupture demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha for KOS-ADLS- total = 0.91), and test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC-total = 0.98). The standard error of measurement (SEM) value was 0.81 and the minimal detectable change (MDC) was 2.23 for KOS-ADLS-total. The validity analysis showed a moderate and low correlation between KOS-ADLS and different domains of SF-36 from r = 0.354 between KOS-ADLS activity and the physical component scale (PCS) of SF-36: to r = 0.206 between KOS-ADLS activity and the mental component scale (MCS) of SF-36.

CONCLUSIONS

The Polish version of KOS-ADLS turned out to be a reliable, valid and responsive self-reported outcome measure, allowing for the self-assessment of symptoms and function related to the knee joint impairment after ACL reconstruction. Therefore, the scale can be applied in clinical practice and research.

Cross-Culturally Adapted Versions of Patient Reported Outcome Measures for the Lower Extremity

Background

A large number of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed in the English language for various lower extremity orthopaedic pathologies. Twenty different PROMs were recommended for 15 specific musculoskeletal lower extremity pathologies or surgeries. However, the availability of cross-culturally adapted versions of these recommended PROMs is unknown.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify the cross-culturally adapted versions of recommended PROMs for individuals experiencing orthopedic lower extremity pathologies or undergoing surgeries, and to identify the psychometric evidence that supports their utilization.

Study design

Literature Review.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL, SPORTDisucs and Scopus were searched for cross-culturally adapted translated studies through May 2022. The search strategy included the names of the 20 recommended PROMs from previous umbrella review along with the following terms: reliability, validity, responsiveness, psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation. Studies that presented a non-English language version of the PROM with evidence in at least one psychometric property to support its use were included. Two authors independently evaluated the studies for inclusion and independently extracted data.

Results

Nineteen PROMS had cross-culturally adapted and translated language versions. The KOOS, WOMAC, ACL-RSL, FAAM, ATRS, HOOS, OHS, MOXFQ and OKS were available in over 10 different language versions. Turkish, Dutch, German, Chinese and French were the most common languages, with each language having more than 10 PROMs with psychometric properties supporting their use. The WOMAC and KOOS were both available in 10 languages and had all three psychometric properties of reliability, validity, and responsiveness supporting their use.

Conclusion

Nineteen of the 20 recommended instruments were available in multiple languages. The PROM most frequently cross-culturally adapted and translated were the KOOS and WOMAC. PROMs were most frequently cross-culturally adapted and translated into Turkish. International researchers and clinicians may use this information to more consistently implement PROMs with the most appropriate psychometric evidence available to support their use.

Level of evidence

3a.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the knee outcome survey - activities of daily living scale

PURPOSE

The Knee Outcome Survey - Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS) is a joint-specific questionnaire measuring symptoms and functional limitations experienced by individuals with painful knee disorders. The original version of the KOS-ADLS has been shown to be reliable, valid and responsive to change. The purpose of this study was to perform a translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the KOS-ADLS into Italian and to assess its reliability and validity.

METHODS

In accordance with standard procedures, the original version of the KOS-ADLS was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Italian (KOS-ADLS-I). Then, the KOS-ADLS-I was administered to 150 patients with knee disorders. A subsample of patients compiled the KOS-ADLS-I again after five/seven days later to evaluate test-retest reliability. Symptoms and function-oriented questionnaires were also completed to evaluate construct validity. Structural validity (Explanatory Factor Analysis [EFA]), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC]), measurement error (Standard Error of the Measurement [SEM], Minimal Detectable Change [MDC]), and construct validity (hypothesis testing) were assessed.

RESULTS

The cross-cultural adaptation procedure revealed no major problems. EFA revealed a unidimensional structure. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.976) and the test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.990, 95%CI: 0.980-0.995) with low measurement error (SEM = 2.6 points; MDC = 7.1 points). The construct validity resulted to be satisfactory, as 100% a-priori hypothesis were met.

CONCLUSIONS

The KOS-ADLS-I is a reliable and valid questionnaire for the assessment of symptoms and functional limitations in individuals with musculoskeletal knee disorders and it can be used in clinical practice and research.

Translation and validation of the Simplified Chinese version of International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form

PURPOSE

To cross-culturally adapt and validate the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form to Simplified Chinese (SC-IKDC-SKF).

METHODS

The original version was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Simplified Chinese according to standard guidelines. A total of 103 patients enrolled in our research. Each participant was asked to complete three instruments including the SC-IKDC-SKF, the Lysholm knee score, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Each participant was asked to complete the SC-IKDC-SKF twice with an interval of 7 days. A portion of the participants (n = 51) finished the SC-IKDC-SKF a third time with an interval of 12 months after arthroscopic treatment. Psychometric assessments included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content and construct validity, and responsiveness.

RESULTS

Strong internal consistency was proved with Cronbach's α = 0.92. The intraclass correlation coefficient reached 0.94, indicating high test-retest reliability. No ceiling or floor effect was observed. Compared with the Lysholm knee score and the subscales of SF-36, good convergent and divergent validity of the SC-IKDC-SKF were demonstrated. The standard response mean was 2.39 and the effect size was 1.33, indicating high responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

The SC-IKDC-SKF was demonstrated to be a reliable, valid and responsive instrument for evaluating knee functions and symptoms of patients with knee pathology in mainland China.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Translation and validation of the simplified Chinese version of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI)

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to obtain a translation and adaptation of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) into simplified Chinese and validate the simplified Chinese version.

METHODS

Translation and adaptation were performed according to the guidelines of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Outcome Committee. A total of 122 patients who were diagnosed with an ACL injury and underwent primary arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) between 2015 and 2016 were included in this study. The simplified Chinese version of the ACL-RSI (SC-ACL-RSI), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form were completed. Psychometric evaluations included score distribution, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct and discriminant validity.

RESULTS

SC-ACL-RSI scores exhibited a normal distribution without ceiling and floor effects. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.98, indicating excellent test-retest reliability. SC-ACL-RSI scores were correlated with all KOOS subscales (r = 0.30 to 0.69, p < 0.001), the IKDC subjective knee form (r = 0.46, p < 0.001) and the Lysholm score (r = 0.56, p < 0.001). The mean scores between patients who returned to the same preinjury level of sport (65.1 ± 14.3) and those who could not return to the same level (51.0 ± 15.0) were significantly different (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The SC-ACL-RSI is a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate the psychological impact of a patient returning to sport after ACLR. It is important to evaluate patients' ability to return to sport after an ACL injury. The information provided by the SC-ACL-RSI will affect decisions regarding treatment and rehabilitation plans, which are more likely to influence clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Polish Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS) in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

The Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS) is a self-reported questionnaire used for the evaluation of the overall health of patients with knee dysfunctions. The purpose of this study was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the Polish version of KOS-ADLS and to evaluate its psychometric properties in patients at the end-stage of knee osteoarthritis who were qualified for a total knee replacement (TKR).

Material/Methods

Seventy patients consecutively qualified for surgical TKR procedure participated in this study. To adapt the KOS-ADLS, the following scales and reference tests were used: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Time Up and Go test (TUG), and Five Times Sit to Stand test (5×STS). The studies were conducted 3 times: 2 weeks before surgery (first study), 6 to 13 days later (retest), and 6 months after surgery.

Results

The Polish version of KOS-ADLS showed excellent reliability (ICC=0.89 SEM=2.68, MDC=7.43) and high responsiveness (ES=4.76, SRM=3.18). The internal consistency was poor in the first assessment (Cronbach’s alpha=0.68), but acceptable in the post-surgery evaluation (Cronbach’s alpha=0.86). There were fair and moderate correlations found between KOS-ADLS and VAS scales in the first examination, TUG, and 5×STS. Stronger correlations were observed between the results obtained in KOS-ADLS and KOOS.

Conclusions

The Polish version of the KOS-ADLS demonstrated good reliability, validity, and responsiveness for use in patients who have undergone TKR surgery.

Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopedic Clinic shoulder and elbow score

Background

The Kerlan-Jobe Orthopedic Clinic shoulder and elbow score (KJOC score) was developed for assessing performance and function in overhead athletes with shoulder and elbow injury and recently adapted as the standard score for overhead athletes in Major League Baseball. However, the Korean version of the KJOC score was not developed in the literature. The aim of the current study was to adapt the English version of the KJOC score to develop a Korean version (K-KJOC) and to evaluate its validity and reliability.

Methods

A total of 52 professional baseball players in the Korean Baseball League completed the K-KJOC at two-week intervals during the off-season. The QuickDASH (11-point Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score was also performed to evaluate the construct validity of the K-KJOC score. The internal consistency of reliability and test–retest reliability were assessed as well.

Results

The K-KJOC score was correlated with the Quick DASH – disability/symptom (−0.309, ~−0.268, p < 0.05), Quick DASH – work (r = −0.721 to −0.671, p = 0.000) and QuickDASH – sports (r = −0.721 to −0.714, p = 0.000). The internal consistency of the K-KJOC score was excellent (Cronbach's α: 0.917–0.966), and the intra-class correlation coefficients of test–retest reliability for the 10 items for the K-KJOC score were fair to excellent (ICC 0.505–0.937, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The K-KJOC score appeared to be a valid and reliable tool for assessing shoulder and elbow injuries in Korean overhead athletes.