Distal Femoral Osteotomy for the Valgus Knee: Medial Closing Wedge Versus Lateral Opening Wedge: A Systematic Review

Hinge screw or no hinge stabilization provides decreased stability compared to hinge plate in a biomechanical evaluation of distal femoral derotational osteotomies

PURPOSE

Derotational distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) is the causal treatment for patients with femoral torsional deformity. The fixation is achieved by a unilateral angle-stable plate. Delayed- or non-unions are one of the main risks of the procedure. An additional contralateral fixation may benefit the outcome. Therefore, we hypothesize that primary stability in DFO can be improved by an additional fixation with a hinge screw or an internal plate.

METHODS

Derotational DFO was performed in 15 knees and fixed either with an angle-stable plate only (group 'None'), with an additional lateral screw (group 'Screw') or with an additional lateral plate (group 'Plate'). Biomechanical evaluation was carried out under axial loading of 150 N (partial weight bearing) and 800 N (full weight bearing), followed by internal and external rotation. After linear axial loading in step 1, a cyclic torsional load of 5 Nm was applied under constant axial load in step 2. In step 3, the specimens were unloaded. Micromovements between the distal and proximal parts of the osteotomy were recorded at each step for all specimens.

RESULTS

In step 1, the extent of micromovements was highest in group 'None' and lowest in group 'Plate' without being significantly different. In step 2, group 'Plate' showed significantly higher stability, reflected by less rotation and lower micromovements. Increasing the axial load from 150 to 800 N at step 2 resulted in increased stability in all groups but only reached significance in group 'None'.

CONCLUSION

An additional contralateral plate significantly increased stability in derotational DFO compared to the unilateral angle-stable plate only. Contrary, a contralateral hinge screw did not provide improved stability.

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Simultaneous correction of leg length discrepancy and angular deformity of the distal femur with retrograde Precice nails: a retrospective analysis of 45 patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Magnetically controlled motorized intramedullary lengthening nails (ILNs) can be employed for simultaneous correction of angular deformities of the distal femur and leg length discrepancy. This spares typical complications of external fixators but requires precise preoperative planning and exact intraoperative execution. To date, its results are insufficiently reported. We aimed to elucidate the following questions: (i) Is acute angular deformity correction and gradual femoral lengthening via a retrograde ILN a reliable and precise treatment option? (ii) What are the most common complications of treatment?

METHODS

Acute angular deformity correction and subsequent gradual lengthening of the distal femur with retrograde ILN was retrospectively analyzed in 45 patients (median patient age: 15 years, interquartile range [IQR] 13-19 and median follow-up: 40 months, IQR 31-50). Outcome parameters were accuracy, precision, reliability, bone healing, and complications of treatment.

RESULTS

The median distraction was 46 mm (IQR 29-49), median distraction and consolidation index 0.9 mm/day (IQR 0.7-1.0) and 29 days/cm (IQR 24-43), respectively. The median preoperative mechanical axis deviation (MAD) was 30 mm (IQR 23-39) in the varus cohort and -25 mm (IQR -29 to -15) in the valgus cohort and reduced to a mean of 8 mm (standard deviation [SD] 8) and -3 (SD 10), respectively. Accuracy, precision, and reliability of lengthening were 94%, 95% and 96%, respectively. Accuracy and precision of deformity correction were 92% and 89%, respectively. In total, 40/45 of patients achieved distraction with a difference of less than 1 cm from the initial plan and a postoperative MAD ranging from -10 mm to +15 mm. In 13/45 patients unplanned additional surgeries were conducted to achieve treatment goal with nonunion being the most frequent (4/45) and knee subluxation (3/45) the most severe complication.

CONCLUSION

Acute deformity correction and subsequent lengthening of the distal femur with retrograde ILN is a reliable and accurate treatment achieving treatment goal in 89% but unplanned additional surgeries in 29% of patients should be anticipated.

Superior accuracy in knee double level osteotomy using a novel hybrid fixation technique compared to conventional double plating

Purpose

This study aimed to compare two different double-level knee osteotomy (DLO) fixation techniques. The primary outcome reported the radiological coronal plane correction and its accuracy. The secondary outcomes reported the correction outliers, the clinical outcomes, the 5-year postoperative satisfaction and the complications.

Methods

A retrospective review of a single surgeon osteotomy database identified 52 cases of DLO between 2011 and 2019, of which 24 cases met the inclusion criteria. Patients were categorised into two groups: the nail-plate (NP) group fixed with a magnetic extendable intramedullary tibial nail and femoral conventional plate, and the double-plate (DP) group fixed with conventional plates (tibia and femur). Radiographic parameters were recorded, including the mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and weight-bearing line ratio (Mikulicz %). Surgical accuracy was calculated as the difference between the achieved and the planned correction. Outliers were defined as those with a greater than 10% difference from the planned correction. Simple knee value scores and visual analogue scale for pain were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 and 5 years. Five-year patient satisfaction was recorded.

Results

A total of 24 patients were included: the NP group (n = 12) and the DP group (n = 12). Significant coronal plane corrections were achieved in the NP group for the mean mFTA (preoperative 167.9° ± 3.4° to postoperative 182.1° ± 1.4°), the mean MPTA (preoperative 83.5° ± 2.9° to postoperative 91.3° ± 2.8°) and the mean mLDFA (preoperative 89.8° ± 3.4° to postoperative 85.9° ± 4.4°). Similarly, significant coronal plane corrections were achieved in the DP group for the mean mFTA (preoperative 168.6° ± 4.4° to postoperative 182.2° ± 2°), the mean MPTA (preoperative 84.2° ± 2° to postoperative 88.3° ± 4.1°) and the mean mLDFA (preoperative 90.7° ± 2.9° to postoperative 83.9° ± 1.7°) (all p < 0.05). The mean correction accuracy was higher for the NP versus DP group at 3.4 ± 3.4% versus 7.1 ± 3.9% (intergroup p < 0.05). There were no outliers in the NP group versus two outliers (overcorrected) (16.7%) in the DP group. Significant clinical improvement was reported in both groups at 2 and 5 years postoperatively (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Superior correction accuracy and no outliers were achieved in hybrid fixation double-level knee osteotomy compared to the conventional double-plating technique. The magnetic extendable nail offers the advantage of fine-tuning the correction postoperatively and could be a potential research template for future designs of postoperative correction implants.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Biomechanical Comparison of Uniplanar versus Biplanar Lateral Opening-wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy Techniques in Terms of Risk for Medial Hinge Fracture

The effect of osteotomy type on the initial stiffness of the bone-implant construct in lateral opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO) using a uniplanar compared with a biplanar technique has been investigated. However, no study has explored the biomechanical risk factors for medial hinge fracture. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical strength of uniplanar versus biplanar LOWDFO regarding the risk for medial hinge fracture during gap opening. Twelve composite femora were divided into two groups (six in each group) based on the distal femoral osteotomy technique: uniplanar versus biplanar LOWDFO. All LOWDFO models were subjected to incremental static loading. The gap distance was expanded by 1 mm, and displacement values were recorded as anterior and posterior gap distances (mm). The average force values of all samples at certain gap distances were recorded, and the head distance was measured. The uniplanar group had higher load values than the biplanar group at all anterior gap distances. These differences were only significant at 2- and 3-mm gap distances (p = 0.025 and 0.037). At all posterior gap distances, the uniplanar group had higher load values than the biplanar group, but these differences only reached statistical significance at 2 mm (p = 0.037). Both groups had similar anterior, posterior, and average gap distances (p = 0.75, 0.522, 0.873). The uniplanar group had a higher head insertion distance (15.3 ± 5.7) than the biplanar group (14.7 ± 2.9), but it was not significant (p = 0.87). The uniplanar group had a lower average load before medial hinge fracture (46.41 ± 13.91 N) than the biplanar group (54.92 ± 31.94, p = 0.81). The biplanar group had an average maximum load value of 64.18 ± 25.6 N, while the uniplanar group had 57.90 ± 12.21 N (p = 0.81). This study revealed that the biplanar osteotomy technique allows a wider opening wedge gap with less risk of a medial hinge fracture than uniplanar LOWDFO.Level of evidence was level 3, case-control series.

Deformity in valgus knee malalignment is not only in the femur but also in tibia or both, based on demographic and morphological analysis before and after knee osteotomies

PURPOSE

This study aims to identify the demographic and morphological features of valgus knee deformity with unilateral osteoarthritic knee in the coronal plane. A secondary aim was to identify the distinct phenotypes of valgus knees in Hirschmann's phenotype and the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classifications before and after a knee osteotomy (KO).

METHODS

A total of 107 patients (57 female and 50 male) with a mean age of 42.4 ± 17.2 years, who underwent varisation osteotomy for symptomatic unilateral knee osteoarthritis (OA) and constitutional valgus deformity, were enrolled in the study, and the mean follow-up period was 29.1 ± 7.3 months. The included cases comprised 60 cases of distal femoral osteotomy, 10 cases of double-level osteotomy and 33 cases of high tibial osteotomy. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative clinical, functional and radiological evaluations, analysed by analysis of variance tests.

RESULTS

An analysis of the location of the valgus deformities demonstrated that 56 cases (52.3%) were femoral based, 18 cases (16.8%) were both femoral and tibial based and 33 cases (30.9%) were tibial based. Twelve preosteotomy cases (11.2%) and 38 postosteotomy cases (35.5%) matched the most common eight Hirschmann's phenotypes, phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young patients without OA. Four (3.7%) preosteotomy cases and 89 postosteotomy cases (83.1%) matched the most common three CPAK phenotypes (Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅴ) based on constitutional alignment and joint line obliquity in healthy and osteoarthritic knees.

CONCLUSION

In valgus knee malalignment, the location of the deformity is not only solely femoral-based but also solely tibial-based or combined femoral and tibial-based. An individualised osteotomy approach would be recommended to achieve careful preoperative planning that considers the location of the deformity and the resultant joint line. Hirschmann's and CPAK classification would not be relevant when KO is considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level Ⅳ, retrospective case-control study.

Around-the-knee osteotomies part II: Surgical indications, techniques and outcomes - State of the art

Recent advances in surgical techniques and planning for knee-based osteotomies have led to improvements in addressing lower extremity malalignment. Part 1 of this review presented the biomechanical and clinical rationale of osteotomies, emphasizing the importance of osteotomies for restoring normal knee kinematics. In Part 2 of this review, indications, surgical technique and outcomes of osteotomies to correct coronal, sagittal and axial plane deformities will be examined. Traditional high tibial and distal femoral osteotomies will be discussed in addition to more recent advanced techniques including biplanar corrections and double-level osteotomies, as well as slope-correcting osteotomies. Patient-specific instrumentation and its use in more complex corrections will also be addressed.

Incidence of Complications After Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy and Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy With Distalization

BACKGROUND

Tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) is a well-established surgical treatment option for patellofemoral instability and pain. TTO with distalization (TTO-D) is indicated for patients with patellofemoral instability, patellar malalignment, and patella alta. The current literature demonstrates several complications that may be associated with TTO, with reportedly higher rates of complications associated with TTO-D.

PURPOSE

To analyze and compare complication rates after TTO without distalization (TTO-ND) and TTO-D and assess risk factors associated with complications.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

All skeletally mature patients who underwent TTO with or without distalization by a single surgeon between September 2014 and May 2023 with a minimum of 6 months of clinical follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patient factors, surgical indications, perioperative data, and complications were collected via a retrospective review of electronic medical records. Concomitant procedures were categorized as intra-articular, extra-articular, and osteotomies.

RESULTS

A total of 251 TTOs (117 TTO-D, 134 TTO-ND) were included in the study group. Postoperative complications were observed in 15 operations (6%), with arthrofibrosis as the most common complication (10 operations [4%]). TTO-D and TTO-ND had similar rates of complication (5% vs 7%; P = .793). Clinical nonunion was observed in 3 operations (3%) in the TTO-D cohort and 1 operation (1%) in the TTO-ND cohort. In the TTO-D cohort, concomitant intra-articular procedures were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of complications in a univariate model. In the TTO-ND cohort, an increased tourniquet time was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of complications in a univariate model. For all TTOs as well as the TTO-D and TTO-ND cohorts, there were no significant associations between patient or surgical variables in a multivariate model.

CONCLUSION

TTO with and without distalization is a safe procedure with low rates of complication. TTO-D was not associated with a higher rate of complications compared with TTO-ND. There was no association between complications and surgical variables for TTO procedures.

Setting hinge position distal to the proximal margin of the distal lateral femur reduces the maximum principal strains of the hinge area and risk of hinge fractures

Purpose

The optimal hinge position to prevent hinge fractures in medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCWDFO) based on the biomechanical background has not yet been well examined. This study aimed to examine the appropriate hinge position in MCWDFO using finite element (FE) analysis to prevent hinge fractures.

Methods

Computer-aided design (CAD) models were created using composite replicate femurs. FE models of the MCWDFO with a 5° wedge were created with three different hinge positions: (A) 5 mm proximal to the proximal margin of the lateral epicondylar region, (B) proximal margin level and (C) 5 mm distal to the proximal margin level. The maximum and minimum principal strains in the cortical bone were calculated for each model. To validate the FE analysis, biomechanical tests were performed using composite replicate femurs with the same hinge position models as those in the FE analysis.

Results

In the FE analysis, the maximum principal strains were in the order of Models A > B > C. The highest value of maximum principal strain was observed in the area proximal to the hinge. In the biomechanical test, hinge fractures occurred in the area proximal to the hinge in Models A and B, whereas the gap closed completely without hinge fractures in Model C. Fractures occurred in an area similar to where the highest maximal principal strain was observed in the FE analysis.

Conclusion

Distal to the proximal margin of the lateral epicondylar region is an appropriate hinge position in MCWDFO to prevent hinge fractures.

Level of Evidence

Level V.

Editorial Commentary: High Tibial Osteotomy and Distal Femoral Osteotomy Address Biologics and Biomechanics

Osteotomies were historically a common treatment for knee osteoarthritis. This has given way to arthroplasty in many patients. However, osteotomies are still an excellent treatment for younger patients with malignment and joint pain. High tibial and distal femoral osteotomy are both mechanical and biological surgeries. Osteotomies about the knee result in both mechanical correction and modulation of the inflammatory environment in the joint resulting from correction of malalignment. This reinforces their importance in the treatment of the knee joint as an organ in which a complex interplay of factors is required for homeostasis. Osteotomy is a critical part of comprehensive treatment of young patients with knee pain, malignment, and cartilage disorders.

Additional Plate Fixation of Hinge Fractures After Varisation Distal Femoral Osteotomies Provides Favorable Torsional Stability: A Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND

Hinge fractures are considered risk factors for delayed or nonunion of the osteotomy gap in distal femoral osteotomies (DFOs). Limited evidence exists regarding the treatment of hinge fractures after DFO, which could improve stability and thus bone healing.

PURPOSE

To (1) examine the effect of hinge fractures on the biomechanical properties of the bone-implant construct, (2) evaluate the biomechanical advantages of an additional fixation of a hinge fracture, and (3) test the biomechanical properties of different types of varisation DFOs.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 32 fresh-frozen human distal femora equally underwent medial closing wedge DFO or lateral opening wedge DFO using a unilateral locking compression plate. The following conditions were serially tested: (1) preserved hinge; (2) hinge fracture along the osteotomy plane; (3) screw fixation of the hinge fracture; and (4) locking T-plate fixation of the hinge fracture. Using a servo-hydraulic materials testing machine, we subjected each construct to 15 cycles of axial compression (400 N; 20 N/s) and internal and external rotational loads (10 N·m; 0.5 N·m/s) to evaluate the stiffness. The axial and torsional hinge displacement was recorded using a 3-dimensional optical measuring system. Repeated-measures 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc Bonferroni correction were used for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

Independent from the type of osteotomy, a fractured hinge significantly (P < .001) increased rotational displacement and reduced stiffness of the bone-implant construct, resulting in ≥1.92 mm increased displacement and ≥70% reduced stiffness in each rotational direction, while the axial stiffness remained unchanged. For both procedures, neither a screw nor a plate could restore intact rotational stiffness (P < .01), while only the plate was able to restore intact rotational displacement. However, the plate always performed better compared with the screw, with significantly higher and lower values for stiffness (+38% to +53%; P < .05) and displacement (-55% to -72%; P < .01), respectively, in ≥1 rotational direction. At the same time, the type of osteotomy did not significantly affect axial and torsional stability.

CONCLUSION

Hinge fractures after medial closing wedge DFO and lateral opening wedge DFO caused decreased bone-implant construct rotational stiffness and increased fracture-site displacement. In contrast, the axial stiffness remained unchanged in the cadaveric model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

When considering an osteosynthesis of a hinge fracture in a DFO, an additional plate fixation was the construct with the highest stiffness and least displacement, which could restore intact hinge rotational displacement.

Distal femoral osteotomy for the valgus knee: indications, complications, clinical and radiological outcome

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to describe the indications and technical aspects of medial closing and lateral opening distal femoral osteotomy (MCDFO and LODFO) for patients with a valgus knee and to report clinical and radiological outcomes and complications.

METHODS

Over 6 years, 28 DFOs (22 MCDFO, 6 LODFO) were performed in 22 Patients. In this cohort study, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and radiological outcome measures as well as complications.

RESULTS

The median (range) age was 47 (17-63) years, height 1.68 (1.56-1.98) m, body mass 80 (49-105) kg, and body mass index (BMI) 27.4 (18.6-37.0) kg/m2. The clinical follow-up was 21 (7-81) months, the need for total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (TKA/UKA) and hardware removal was followed up for 59 (7-108) months postoperatively. Preoperatively, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA, negative values denote varus) was 7.0 (2.0-13.0)°, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) was 83.7 (79.9-88.2)°, and mechanical proximal tibial angle (MPTA) was 89.0 (86.6-94.5)°. Postoperatively, HKA was -1.3 (-9.0-1.2)° and mLDFA was 90.8 (87.3-97.3)°. The incidence of minor and major complications was 25% and 14%, the incidence of delayed and nonunion was 18% and 4%, respectively. At the last follow-up, 18% of the patients had pain at rest, 25% during activities of daily living, and 39% during physical activity, and 71% were satisfied with the outcome. 7% of the cases received a TKA/UKA, 71% received a hardware removal.

CONCLUSION

DFO is a reasonable treatment for lateral osteoarthritis in younger patients to avoid disease progression and the need for an UKA/TKA. However, there is a long rehabilitation time, a considerable risk for complications, and a high need for hardware removal. While many patients experienced symptoms at the long-term follow-up, most were satisfied with the outcome. Appropriate patient information is essential. Level of evidence Level IV, Case Series. Trial registration number NCT04382118, clinicaltrials.gov, May 11, 2020.

In closed wedge distal femur osteotomies for correction of valgus malalignment overcorrection of mLDFA should be avoided

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of the mLDFA (mechanical lateral distal femur angle) as a parameter in varus realignment osteotomies for valgus deformities of the knee. We hypothesized that joint line obliquity with mLDFA > 90° after distal femur osteotomy (DFO) is associated with inferior clinical outcome.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, a total of 52 patients with isolated femoral valgus deformities were included in the study. The mean postoperative follow-up was 70.5 (SD 33.3) months (standard deviation SD±33.3). In all patients, a distal femur osteotomy was performed. A clinical examination and survey of questionnaires was conducted with the HSS (Hospital for Special Surgery), LG (Lysholm-Gilquist), and KOOS (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) scores. Several radiological parameters were assessed on long-standing x-rays: mechanical tibio-femoral angle (mTFA), mLDFA, mechanical medial proximal tibia angle (mMPTA), joint-line convergence angle (JLCA). The t test was used for normally distributed data. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed in non-normally distributed data.

RESULTS

The mLDFA was 84.9° (SD±2.3) preop and changed to 91.9° (SD±3, 22.9) postop. The mTFA (mechanical tibio-femoral angle) was 5.2° (SD±2.9°) preop and - 1.8° (SD±2.9) postop demonstrating a difference of 6.7°. For analysis, the data was divided into two groups based on postop mLDFA. Group 1: mLDFA ≤ 90°; Group 2: > 90°. Postoperatively, a mean mLDFA of 88.6° (SD±1.4°) was measured in group 1 and 93.9° (SD±2.1) in group 2. The change in mLDFA was 4.7° (SD±1.6) in group 1 and 8.4° (SD±2.8) in group 2. Preoperatively, the mTFA was 4.8° (SD±1.9) in group 1 and 5.5° (SD±3.3) in group 2. Postoperatively, the mTFA decreased in group 1 by 4.8° (SD±2.3) to - 0.1° (SD±2.1). In group 2, the mTFA decreased by 8.2° (SD±3.8) to - 2.8° (SD±2.9). Regarding the HSS, group 1 showed a 10.4 points better score than group 2 (p<0.01). Also, regarding the Lysholm, a significant difference of 16.9 points was found (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Correction of valgus knees using closed wedge DFO leads to good clinical results. A postoperative mLDFA of 85-90° results in superior clinical outcome compared to mLDFA > 90°. Joint-line obliquity should be avoided using double level osteotomy, if needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Finite element analysis of medial closing and lateral opening wedge osteotomies of the distal femur in relation to hinge fractures

PURPOSE

Intraoperative hinge fractures in distal femur osteotomies represent a risk factor for loss of alignment and non-union. Using finite element analysis, the goal of this study was to investigate the influence of different hinge widths and osteotomy corrections on hinge fractures in medial closed-wedge and lateral open-wedge distal femur osteotomies.

METHODS

The hinge was located at the proximal margin of adductor tubercle for biplanar lateral open-wedge and at the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle for biplanar medial closed-wedge distal femur osteotomies, corresponding to optimal hinge positions described in literature. Different hinge widths (5, 7.5, 10 mm) were created and the osteotomy correction was opened/closed by 5, 7.5 and 10 mm. Tensile and compressive strain of the hinge was determined in a finite element analysis and compared to the ultimate strain of cortical bone to assess the hinge fracture risk.

RESULTS

Doubling the correction from 5 to 10 mm increased mean tensile and compressive strain by 50% for lateral open-wedge and 48% for medial closed-wedge osteotomies. A hinge width of 10 mm versus 5 mm showed increased strain in the hinge region of 61% for lateral open-wedge and 32% for medial closed-wedge osteotomies. Medial closed-wedge recorded a higher fracture risk compared to lateral open-wedge osteotomies due to a larger hinge cross-section area (60-67%) for all tested configurations. In case of a 5 mm hinge, medial closed-wedge recorded 71% higher strain in the hinge region compared to lateral open-wedge osteotomies.

CONCLUSION

Due to morphological features of the medial femoral condyle, finite element analysis suggests that lateral-open wedge osteotomies are the preferable option if larger corrections are intended, as a thicker hinge can remain without an increased hinge fracture risk.

Influence of lateral hinge fractures on biplanar medial closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy for valgus knee: a new classification of lateral hinge fracture

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of lateral hinge fractures in medial closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCWDFO) on bone union.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients were followed-up for more than 1 year after MCWDFO. The incidence and type of hinge fracture, as well as the course of bone healing, were investigated. Slow healing was defined as bone union was not obtained until 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Hinge fractures were observed in 12 cases (57%). There were three types of hinge fractures. Type 1: the lateral cortex was completely cut through (4 cases), type 2: the osteotomy line was too proximal (6 cases), and type 3: the hinge point was significantly medial (2 cases). There was a significant difference in the mean correction angles between hinge fracture and no-fracture cases, with the mean angles being 13.8 ± 4.0° and 9.6 ± 3.1°, respectively. Sixty-seven percent (8/12) of cases with hinge fractures developed slow healing. Among the hinge fracture cases, when there was no displacement of the hinge fracture and good contact with the anterior flange, 40% (2/5) of cases developed slow healing. If there was displacement of the hinge or no contact of the anterior flange, 86% (6/7) of cases developed slow healing. In contrast, only 11% (1/9) of subjects who did not have a hinge fracture, developed slow healing. In 67% (6/9) of cases with slow healing, a correction loss of 2° or greater (average: 4.3 degrees valgus) was observed. There were no cases of non-union. Clinical outcomes at 1 year showed no significant difference between the groups with and without hinge fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a very high risk of hinge fracture in patients undergoing MCWDFO. Hinge fractures often lead to slow healing and a loss of correction. We recommend the endpoint of the distal lateral cortex of the femur as the ideal hinge point for the prevention of hinge fractures. Bone union is obtained slowly in even all hinge fracture cases without revision surgery. Consequently, surgical results are not affected by the occurrence of hinge fracture at 1 year.

Outcomes of Distal Femoral Osteotomy for Valgus Malalignment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Closing Wedge Versus Opening Wedge Techniques

BACKGROUND

Valgus knee deformity increases the risk for lateral articular chondral damage, contributing to earlier onset and accelerated progression of osteoarthritis. Distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) unloads the lateral joint compartment and can be performed using closing wedge (CW) or opening wedge (OW) techniques.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis for patients with valgus knee deformity undergoing DFO to determine differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, and survival rates, comparing CW versus OW DFO.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review, Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A literature review was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines utilizing PubMed, Cochrane Database, Ovid/MEDLINE, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies reporting outcomes in patients undergoing CW or OW DFO for the treatment of valgus knee deformities with symptomatic lateral compartment pathology with a minimum 2-year follow-up. PROMs and complications were analyzed using random-effects modeling to identify differences in outcomes as a function of surgical technique. Long-term survival data, defined as conversion to total knee arthroplasty, were analyzed using a multiple metaregression model as a function of individual study follow-up time points and surgical technique.

RESULTS

In total, we included 23 retrospective studies (n = 619 knees), of which 10 studies (n = 271 knees) reported outcomes after CW DFO and 13 studies (n = 348 knees) reported on OW DFO outcomes. Good to excellent clinical outcomes were reported in PROMs when compared with preoperative values with both techniques, while no significant differences between techniques were appreciated on functional Knee Society Scores and Tegner scores. No significant differences were appreciated in the incidence of complications reported in patients undergoing CW (20%) versus OW (33%) DFO (P = .432). Pain requiring hardware removal was the most commonly reported complication in both groups. The survival rate for CW DFO was 81.5% (mean follow-up, 8.8 ± 4.3 years) compared with 90.5% for OW DFO (mean follow-up, 4.5 ± 1.5 years). Multiple metaregression demonstrated that patient follow-up (P < .001) was significantly associated with knee survival, while surgical technique (P = .810) was not a predictor of clinical failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Both CW and OW DFO techniques were associated with good to excellent clinical outcomes with no significant differences in PROMs based on technique. Pain requiring hardware removal was the most common complication in both techniques, while long-term survivability was found to be a function of follow-up and not surgical technique. Technique selection should be based on shared patient-physician decision making with an emphasis on surgeon preference and technique familiarity.

Functional and Radiographic Results of Arthroscopy-Assisted Lateral Open-Wedge Distal Femur Osteotomy for Lateral Compartment Osteoarthritis with Valgus Knee

Treating lower extremity malalignment-related knee osteoarthritis, especially valgus alignment, is a challenge. A high revision rate was observed with patients who underwent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, so distal femur osteotomy has regained its popularity. This research aimed to evaluate the radiographic and functional outcomes of arthroscopy-assisted lateral open-wedge distal femur osteotomy (LOWDFO) for patients with lateral compartment osteoarthritis and valgus knees with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Our study retrospectively included isolated lateral osteoarthritis (Outerbridge grade 3 and grade 4) of the knee related to valgus alignment and a young age (<65 y/o) with the demand for a high-impact activity event. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic and functional outcomes were evaluated. Significant pre-operative and postoperative mechanical correction was observed with mechanical axis deviation (preop/postop: −28.77 ± 12.98/−9.45 ± 7.36, p < 0.001), hip-knee angle (preop/postop: 7.64 ± 3.62/2.68 ± 2.04, p < 0.001), and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA, preop/postop: 10.9 ± 4.14/5.66 ± 3.71, p < 0.001). The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score also showed improvement after the operation (preop/postop: 57.36 ± 11.98/79.02 ± 4.58, p = 0.002). In conclusion, lateral open-wedge distal femur osteotomy is effective in treating patients with lateral compartment osteoarthritis and valgus knees with a low complication rate and excellent outcome.

Distalization of hinge site with use of hinge wire reduces hinge fracture rates in closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy

PURPOSE

Closing wedge distal femoral osteotomies (CWDFO) are attractive treatment options for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis with coronal plane deformity. However, it has been traditionally associated with high rates of hinge fracture that can adversely impact recovery and patient outcomes. Appropriate siting of hinge point can be an effective method of reducing the incidence of hinge fractures. This study aims to illustrate a case series of CWDFO with low rates of hinge fracture utilising our preferred hinge point site.

METHODS

A retrospective study of a cohort of 39 CWDFO was performed between May 2019 and May 2022. Both medial and lateral CWDFO were included. The hinge point in all cases was placed at the level of the inferior margin of the metaphyseal flare, and inferior to the gastrocnemius origin, with a hinge thickness of 10 mm. Post-operative radiographs were obtained at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after surgery to assess for hinge fracture and union.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine cases of CWDFO were performed, consisting of eighteen cases of valgus malalignment that underwent medial CWDFO and twenty-one cases of varus malalignment that underwent lateral CWDFO. At surgery, the mean age was 47.6 (± 13.9) years and mean BMI was 29.4 (± 4.9). There were 23 men and 16 women. Three cases of hinge fractures occurred intraoperatively, translating into a hinge fracture rate of 7.69%. However, union was achieved in all three cases and all patients in this case series were able to progress to weight bear as tolerated at 2 months post-osteotomy.

CONCLUSION

Distal placement of the hinge at the level of the inferior metaphyseal flare margin with the use of a hinge wire can greatly reduce the rates of hinge fracture in CWDFO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Predictive Factors for Lateral Hinge Fracture in Medial Closing Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have reported that lateral hinge fracture (LHF) has a negative effect on bone healing at the osteotomy site after medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCDFO). However, limited evidence exists in the literature regarding the predictive factors for LHF in MCDFO.

HYPOTHESIS

A large medial closing gap and a lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area would increase plain radiography-based and/or computed tomography (CT)-based LHF in MCDFO.

STUDY DESIGN

Case control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 67 knees of 53 patients (mean age, 37.4 ± 16.9 years) who underwent MCDFO between May 2009 and June 2021. The surgical indications for MCDFO were genu valgum deformity combined with either lateral compartment osteoarthritis or recurrent patellar dislocation. The presence of LHF was evaluated based on immediate postoperative plain radiography and CT scans. The predictive factors for LHF in MCDFO were investigated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

LHFs were identified in 21 knees (31.3%) through plain radiography and in 40 knees (59.7%) through CT. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the medial closing gap and lateral hinge position were predictive factors for plain radiography- and CT-based LHF after MCDFO. Controlling for other variables, we found that an increase in the medial opening gap by 1 mm increased the likelihood of plain radiography-based LHF by a factor of 1.805 (95% CI, 1.291-2.525; P = .001) and CT-based LHF by 1.333 (95% CI, 1.003-1.772; P = .048). Moreover, a lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area increased the likelihood of plain radiography-based LHF by a factor of 9.870 (95% CI, 2.179-44.720; P = .003) and CT-based LHF by 5.686 (95% CI, 1.124-28.754; P = .036).

CONCLUSION

A large medial closing gap and lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area are associated with LHF in MCDFO. Care should be taken to prevent LHF in MCDFO with a large medial closing gap. Moreover, a lateral hinge position in the supracondylar area should be avoided to decrease the incidence of LHF in MCDFO.

Analysis of bone union after medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy using a new radiographic scoring system

INTRODUCTION

To compare bone union after medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCWDFO) with that after lateral closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LCWDFO) using a novel scoring system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of 30 patients who received biplanar MCWDFO for valgus knees (MCWDFO group) were retrospectively examined and compared to that of 22 patients (25 knees) who underwent biplanar LCWDFO via a double-level osteotomy (DLO) for varus knees (LCWDFO group). The progression of bone union of the transverse osteotomy plane in the femur was assessed using a newly developed scoring system using radiographs taken immediately after surgery and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The scoring system is based on a scale of zero to six points with higher scores indicating better bone union. The incidence of hinge fractures was assessed using CT images, and the rates of reoperation were evaluated using medical record data.

RESULTS

The mean bone union score was significantly lower in the MCWDFO group than in the LCWDFO group 3 months (2.1 ± 1.9 vs. 3.7 ± 1.7, P < 0.01) and 6 months (3.8 ± 2.1 vs 4.9 ± 1.5, P < 0.05) postoperatively. The incidence ratio of hinge fractures was significantly higher in the MCWDFO group than in the LCWDFO group (70.0% vs. 32.0%, P < 0.01). Two patients in the MCWDFO group underwent reoperation for delayed bone union or non-union.

CONCLUSION

Bone union progression was slower and hinge fractures were more frequently observed after MCWDFO than after LCWDFO via DLO. MCWDFO is technically challenging, and patients must be monitored closely during and after surgery.

Knee Osteotomies Can Be Performed Safely In An Ambulatory Setting

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of hospital admissions, inpatient conversions, reoperations, and complications associated with tibial tubercle osteotomies (TTO), high tibial osteotomies (HTO), and distal femoral osteotomies (DFO) performed at our ambulatory surgery center compared with our inpatient hospital facility.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients receiving a TTO, HTO or DFO at our institution between June 2011 and October 2019 was performed. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients undergoing the aforementioned procedures for malalignment, and a minimum of 90-days follow-up. Revision osteotomies, those undergoing an osteotomy for an acute fracture, and those with rule-out criteria for outpatient surgery (ASA > 3, and body mass index >40) were excluded. Complications, including readmission and reoperation, were compared between the two groups using either the Fisher’s exact test and independent samples t-test, where applicable, and a P value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The study included 531 patients undergoing osteotomies (222 ambulatory surgical center [ASC] and 309 hospital) with no patients lost to follow-up in the 90-day postoperative period. No patients operated on at an ASC required transfer to inpatient setting. There were no differences in complication rates, readmission, or reoperation rates among the two groups (4.1% vs 4.9%; P = .8328; 3.1% vs 4.5%, P = .5026; 3.1% vs 4.5%; P = .5026; respectively). Complications, including surgical site infection and arthrofibrosis were not significantly different in the two cohorts, (1.4% vs. 2.6%, P = .341 and 1.4% vs 1%; P = .698, respectively).

Conclusions

Osteotomies about the knee performed in an ambulatory setting were safe, with no difference in readmission, reoperation, or postoperative complications compared to those performed at an inpatient hospital. Additionally, no patient required conversion from an outpatient to an inpatient setting.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Lateral Femoral Condyle and Distal Femoral Osteotomy in the Setting of Failed Osteochondritis Dissecans Fixation

Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a pathologic condition, most commonly affecting the knee joint in adolescents and young adults, although pathology can also be found at the elbow and ankle. Lesions to the medial femoral condyle are classically associated with varus alignment, while lesions to the lateral femoral condyle are seen in patients with valgus malalignment. Common risk factors for failed fixation of OCD lesions include unstable lesions to the lateral femoral condyle, screw breakage, older age, and closed physes. The purpose of this technical note is to describe the preoperative planning and step-by-step surgical approach for treatment of failed fixation of an OCD lesion of the posterior aspect of the lateral femoral condyle in young, active patients using an osteochondral allograft, a lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy to correct malalignment, and a tibial tubercle osteotomy to facilitate access to the lesion.

Optimizing indications and technique in osteotomies around the knee

Osteotomies around the knee represent a valid surgical treatment in young active patients affected by unicompartmental osteoarthritis and/or knee ligament instability.

This review article describes the main osteotomies performed around the knee and their optimization, with particular attention to indications and surgical technique in light of the most recent literature and author experience.

Further developments have to be expected from technological advances, focusing particularly on surgical planning and the control of intraoperative deformity correction by pre-shaped cutting blocks.

Improved Clinical Outcome and High Rate of Return to Low-Impact Sport and Work After Knee Double Level Osteotomy for Bifocal Varus Malalignment

PURPOSE

To evaluate return to sport (RTS) and work (RTW), as well as clinical outcomes following double level osteotomy (DLO) via combined medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy and lateral closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy for bifocal symptomatic varus malalignment, and to compare these outcome parameters between patients undergoing a single surgery and those undergoing a two-stage procedure.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent DLO for symptomatic varus malalignment between 12/2007 and 03/2018 were enrolled. Patients converted to arthroplasty (n = 3) during follow-up were excluded. Outcome measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lysholm score, Tegner Activity Scale, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, which were collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 24 months postoperatively. RTS and RTW were evaluated by questionnaire. Outcome measures were compared between DLO performed in a single- versus a two-stage surgery.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (mean age: 44.2 ± 12.6 years), who underwent DLO for varus malalignment (10.1° ± 2.9°) were included at a mean follow-up of 56.9 ± 35.3 months (range: 24-148). Compared to preoperatively, these patients significantly improved in IKDC (50.4 ± 13.9 to 66.1 ± 15.4; P < .001), WOMAC (29.7 ± 19.2 to 11.8 ± 13.5; P < .001) and Lysholm (53.6 ± 23.6 to 73.1 ± 23.6; P = .002) scores at final follow-up. For the WOMAC score, 78% of the patients included reached the minimally important clinical difference, along with a significant reduction of the VAS for pain (5.0 ± 3.0 to 2.5 ± 2.4; P < .001). Postoperatively, 96% of patients returned to sport after 7.7 ± 4.8 months, but at a lower frequency (P = .010) and to fewer disciplines (P = .005) with a shift to low-impact sports. 90% of the patients returned to work at a mean 5.9 ± 9.4 months, with 79% reporting a similar or superior working ability. Patients undergoing a two-stage procedure recovered to full physical working ability at a significantly longer duration, as compared to a single-stage procedure (9.8 ± 3.8 vs 9.0 ± 13.1 months; P = .047).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients undergoing DLO for symptomatic varus malalignment, who were not converted to arthroplasty, experienced clinically significant functional improvement at mid-term follow-up. Return to sport and work rates in these patients were high; however, a shift to lower-impact sports disciplines was observed. Similar clinical outcomes can be expected when performing DLO in a single surgery or a two-stage procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective case series; Level IV.

Return to Sport and Work Following Distal Femoral Varus Osteotomy: A Systematic Review

Background: Distal femoral varus osteotomy (DFVO) is an effective surgical intervention for the management of symptomatic valgus malalignment of the knee. Because it preserves the native knee joint and its ligamentous stability, DFVO is preferred to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the young, active population. Purpose: We sought to assess return to work (RTW) and return to sport (RTS) rates following DFVO for valgus malalignment of the knee. Methods: For this systematic review, we searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from inception through December 31, 2020. English language studies of all levels of evidence explicitly reporting on RTS and RTW rates following DFVO for valgus malalignment of the knee were eligible for inclusion. Results: Seven studies and 127 patients were included in our analysis. Mean age was 32.4 ± 8.8 years with men comprising 46.7% ± 22.3% of study populations. The mean RTS rate was 87.2% ± 10.7%, with a return to preoperative activity levels rate of 65.4% ± 26.8%. The mean RTW rate was 81.8% ± 23.3%, with a return to preoperative activity levels of 72.8% ± 18.1%. The mean reoperation rate was 35.6% ± 18.8% within a mean follow-up period of 5.5 ± 1.9 years. Conclusions: This systematic review of low-level studies found DFVO to be a safe and effective procedure for the management of genu valgum in young, active populations, with most patients returning to sport and/or work, although not all at their preoperative activity levels. A paucity of data surrounds RTS and RTW rates following DFVO. Future studies should explicitly report both return to activity rates and whether patients returned to their preoperative activity levels.

[Osteotomy close to the knee joint in adults]

Osteotomy close to the knee joint in cases of axial deformities or in the context of corrective interventions is still an elementary component of the spectrum of orthopedic surgery. The precise localization and analysis of the pathology are crucial in order to restore approximate physiological loading conditions by means of a suitable osteotomy procedure. Thus, above all, the medial open-wedge tibial osteotomy has become established as a standard procedure for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis caused by extra-articular tibial varus deformity. Furthermore, corrective osteotomy of the sagittal axis of the tibia and of the distal femur also show good long-term results when the indications are correctly interpreted. The osteotomies described in this article are corrections that should be performed after careful consideration of the biological and mechanical aspects. Correct planning, attention to risk factors and the surgical technique are the main factors that determine the long-term success of the procedure.

[Research progress of osteotomy around knee in the treatment of valgus knee osteoarthritis]

OBJECTIVE

To review the research progress of surgical methods of osteotomy around the knee in the treatment of valgus knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

The relevant literature on the surgical treatment of valgus knee osteoarthritis at home and abroad in recent years was reviewed, and the advantages, disadvantages, and effectiveness of different surgical methods of osteotomy around the knee were summarized.

RESULTS

For young and active patients with symptomatic valgus knee osteoarthritis, osteotomy around the knee is a safe and reliable treatment option. At present, the main surgical methods include medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy, lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy, medial closing wedge high tibial osteotomy, and lateral opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. The indications, advantages, and disadvantages of different osteotomies are different, and the selection of appropriate surgical method is the key to achieve good effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

There are many osteotomies in the treatment of valgus knee osteoarthritis. In order to achieve good results, improve survival rate, and reduce postoperative complications, the most reasonable surgical strategy needs to be developed according to different situations.

High Tibial Osteotomies for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee

»

A high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a joint-preserving procedure that can be used to treat symptomatic unicompartmental cartilage disorders in the presence of limb malalignment.

»

Appropriate patient selection and careful preoperative planning are vital for optimizing outcomes.

»

Based on past literature, correction of varus malalignment to 3° to 8° of valgus appears to lead to favorable results. Recently, there has been growing awareness that it is important to consider soft-tissue laxity during preoperative planning.

»

Although there has been a recent trend toward performing opening-wedge rather than closing-wedge or dome HTOs for unicompartmental osteoarthritis, current data suggest that all 3 are acceptable techniques with varying complication profiles.

»

Based on current evidence, an HTO provides pain relief, functional improvement, and a high rate of return to sport, with reported survivorship ranging from 74.7% to 97.6% and 66.0% to 90.4% at 10 and 15 years, respectively.

Biomechanical analysis of the role of hinge support fixators on hinge stability in medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine the hinge-stabilizing biomechanical effects of hinge support fixators, applied for lateral hinge fractures sustained following distal femoral osteotomy.

METHODS

Medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy was performed using a locking plate on 10 cadaveric limbs. The limbs were divided into two groups: the non-fracture group and the lateral hinge fracture group. A cyclic axial load of 400 N was applied to the knee to keep it extended and flexed at 45°. The hinge-stabilizing effects of adding a screw or a short support plate to the lateral fracture site were examined by measuring the translation and rotational angles of the anterodistal and posterodistal hinge positions as well as the surface strains of the medial locking plate.

FINDINGS

Translation and rotation in the fracture group were significantly more pronounced than in the non-fracture group, at the anterodistal and posterodistal positions. Translations at both positions were significantly reduced, by adding the support plate, during both extension and 45-degree flexion in the fracture group. The rotation at the posterodistal position upon extension and the anterodistal position upon 45-degree flexion was significantly reduced by the support plate. The surface strain of the medial plate in the fracture group was significantly reduced by the support plate upon both extension and 45-degree flexion.

INTERPRETATION

Lateral hinge fractures caused abnormal hinge movements, which were significantly reduced by the short support plate. A short support plate could be used if a hinge fracture occurs during distal femoral osteotomy, to improve lateral hinge stability.

Dislocated hinge fractures are associated with malunion after lateral closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence, morphology, and associated complications of medial cortical hinge fractures after lateral closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LCW-DFO) for varus malalignment and to identify constitutional and technical factors predisposing for hinge fracture and consecutive complications.

METHODS

Seventy-nine consecutive patients with a mean age of 47 ± 12 years who underwent LCW-DFO for symptomatic varus malalignment at the authors' institution between 01/2007 and 03/2018 with a minimum of 2-year postoperative time interval were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. Demographic and surgical data were collected. Measurements evaluating the osteotomy cut (length, wedge height, hinge angle) and the location of the hinge (craniocaudal and mediolateral orientation, relation to the adductor tubercle) were conducted on postoperative anterior-posterior knee radiographs and the incidence and morphology of medial cortical hinge fractures was assessed. A risk factor analysis of constitutional and technical factors predisposing for the incidence of a medial cortical hinge fracture and consecutive complications was conducted.

RESULTS

The incidence of medial cortical hinge fractures was 48%. The most frequent morphological type was an extension fracture type (68%), followed by a proximal (21%) and distal fracture type (11%). An increased length of the osteotomy in mm (53.1 ± 10.9 vs. 57.7 ± 9.6; p = 0.049), an increased height of the excised wedge in mm (6.5 ± 1.9 vs. 7.9 ± 3; p = 0.040) as well as a hinge location in the medial sector of an established sector grid (p = 0.049) were shown to significantly predispose for the incidence of a medial cortical hinge fracture. The incidence of malunion after hinge fracture (14%) was significantly increased after mediolateral dislocation of the medial cortical bone > 2 mm (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Medial cortical hinge fractures after LCW-DFO are a common finding. An increased risk of sustaining a hinge fracture has to be expected with increasing osteotomy wedge height and a hinge position close to the medial cortex. Furthermore, dislocation of a medial hinge fracture > 2 mm was associated with malunion and should, therefore, be avoided.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study; Level IV.

Return to Sport following Isolated Lateral Opening Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy

Purpose. The aims of this study were to (1) examine the timeline of return to sport (RTS) following isolated lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (DFO), (2) evaluate the degree of participation on RTS, and (3) identify risk factors for failure to RTS. Methods. Nineteen consecutive patients undergoing isolated lateral opening wedge DFO were reviewed retrospectively at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Patients completed a sports questionnaire, visual analogue scale for pain (VAS-Pain), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), and a satisfaction questionnaire. Results. Seventeen patents (89.5%; age 32.1 ± 10.1 years; gender 9 males, 52.9%) were contacted at 7.3 ± 4.4 years (range 2.0-13.8 years). Twelve patients (70.6%) resumed playing ≥1 sport at an average time of 9.5 ± 3.3 months (range 3-12 months). Of these 12 patients, 6 returned to a lower level of participation (50.0%). Seven patients (41.2%) had returned to the operating room for further surgery, which included removal of hardware (5.9%) and total knee arthroplasty (5.9%). The average VAS-Pain, SANE, and Marx scores were 3.4 ± 2.6 (range 0-8), 56.2 ± 18.7 (range 20-85), and 5.0 ± 5.3 (range 0-16), respectively. Fourteen patients (82.4%) were at least somewhat satisfied with their procedure. Conclusion. In patients with isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis and valgus deformity, lateral opening wedge DFO allows 70.6% of patients to RTS by 9.5 ± 3.3 months. However, most patients may be unable to return to their presymptomatic level of function. Patient expectations regarding RTS can be appropriately managed with adequate preoperative patient education. Level of Evidence. IV, case series.

Knee Joint Distraction as Treatment for Osteoarthritis Results in Clinical and Structural Benefit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Limited Number of Studies and Patients Available

OBJECTIVE

Knee joint distraction (KJD) is a joint-preserving osteoarthritis treatment that may postpone a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in younger patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates short- and long-term clinical benefit and tissue structure changes after KJD.

DESIGN

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched for eligible clinical studies evaluating at least one of the primary parameters: WOMAC, VAS-pain, KOOS, EQ5D, radiographic joint space width or MRI cartilage thickness after KJD. Random effects models were applied on all outcome parameters and outcomes were compared with control groups found in the included studies.

RESULTS

Eleven articles reporting on 7 different KJD cohorts with in total 127 patients and 5 control groups with multiple follow-up moments were included, of which 2 were randomized controlled trials. Significant improvements in all primary parameters were found and benefit lasted up to at least 9 years. Overall, outcomes were comparable with control groups, including high tibial osteotomy, although TKA showed better clinical response.

CONCLUSIONS

Current, still limited, evidence shows KJD causes clear benefit in clinical and structural parameters, both short- and long-term. Longer follow-up with more patients is necessary, to validate outcome and to potentially improve patient selection for this intensive treatment. Thus far, for younger knee osteoarthritis patients, KJD may be an option to consider.

Genu Valgum Correction and Biplanar Osteotomies

Valgus malalignment is an important risk factor in recurrent patella instability. This article explores the role of corrective osteotomy and discusses the various described methods both on the femoral and tibial sides of the joint. A detailed operative technique of medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy is included.

Detection of Lateral Hinge Fractures After Medial Closing Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy: Computed Tomography Versus Plain Radiography

BACKGROUND

Limited evidence exists in the literature regarding the detection rates of lateral hinge fracture (LHF) on computed tomography (CT) after medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCDFO). Moreover, the effect of LHF on bone healing after MCDFO remains unclear.

HYPOTHESIS

The detection rates of LHF after MCDFO would be higher on CT than on plain radiography. The incidence of problematic bone healing would be higher in the knees with LHF than in those without LHF.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis), Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients who underwent MCDFO between May 2009 and July 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. The presence of LHF was evaluated using immediate postoperative plain radiography and CT. The detection rates of LHF on plain radiography and CT were compared. The incidence of problematic bone healing (nonunion, delayed union, and loss of correction) was also compared between the knees with LHF and those without LHF.

RESULTS

A total of 55 knees of 43 patients (mean age, 37.7 ± 16.7 years) were included in the study. Although 33 LHFs were detected on CT, only 19 LHFs were detected on plain radiography. The detection rate of LHF was significantly higher on CT than on plain radiography (60% vs 34.5%; P = .008). At 1-year follow-up, 10 cases of problematic bone healing (1 nonunion, 4 delayed unions, and 5 losses of correction) were identified. The incidence of problematic bone healing was significantly higher in the knees with LHF than in those without LHF as shown on plain radiography (36.8% vs 8.3%; P = .001) and CT (30.3% vs 0%; P = .004).

CONCLUSION

LHF can be detected better on CT than on plain radiography and has a negative effect on bone healing after MCDFO. For patients with LHF detected on either plain radiography or CT, careful rehabilitation with close follow-up is recommended.

Patient-Specific Instrument Guided Double Chevron-Cut Distal Femur Osteotomy

The risk of non-union and prolonged periods of protected weight-bearing still remain unsolved issues after distal femur osteotomy (DFO). To improve the stability, we developed the double chevron-cut technique, which is a modified medial closing-wedge DFO guided by a patient-specific instrument. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and outcome of this operative approach. Twenty-five knees in twenty-three consecutive patients with genu valgum and lateral compartment osteoarthritis that received double chevron-cut DFO were included. The target of correction was 50% on the weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio. Patient-reported outcomes included the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS). The mean of the WBL ratio was corrected from 78.7% ± 12.0% to 48.7% ± 2.9% postoperatively. The mean time to full weight bearing was 3.7 ± 1.4 weeks. Union of the osteotomy was achieved at 11.3 ± 2.8 weeks. At a mean follow-up of 17 months, the OKS improved from a mean of 27.6 ± 11.7 to 39.1 ± 7.5 (p = 0.03), and the KSS from a mean of 92.1 ± 13.0 to 143.9 ± 10.2 (p < 0.001). Three patients developed complications, including one case of peri-implant fracture, one of loss of fixation, and one of non-union. The double chevron-cut DFO followed by immediate weight-bearing as tolerated is effective in treating genu valgum deformity and associated lateral compartment osteoarthritis.

Medial closure supracondylar femoral osteotomy: an effective solution for long-term treatment of arthritic valgus knee?

Purpose

The aim of this work was to retrospectively analyze the clinical, subjective, and radiological results of medial closing-wedge distal femur osteotomy (MCW-DFO) for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) in valgus knee at medium- to long-term follow-up.

Materials and methods

A total of 57 patients (62 knees) treated with MCW-DFO between 1984 and 2018 were included in the study. Patient age at the time of the surgery ranged between 28 and 61 years (average: 48 years). All patients with a minimum follow-up of 4 years were contacted to request for them to undergo clinical, subjective, and radiological evaluation. Preoperative hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle (i.e., preoperative valgus malalignment) was 8.6° ± 2°. Patients were evaluated using the following scales: the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Knee Society Score (KSS), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Numeric Rating Scale 11 (NRS-11).

Results

Mean follow-up was 11.6 ± 4.9 years, and a total of 17 patients (20 knees) were available for the last examination. At maximum follow-up, 4 patients underwent conversion to a total knee replacement (20%); their survival rate was 100% at 10 years and 66.7% at 15 years, as estimated using the Kaplan–Meier curve. The subjective Knee Society Score improved on average from 37.7 ± 10 to 63.9 ± 15.4. The objective Knee Society Score improved on average from 42.2 ± 11.7 to 75 ± 22.5. The pain detected through the VAS and NRS-11 scales improved from 56.7 ± 12.9 to 42 ± 17.1 and from 5.8 ± 1.1 to 4.4 ± 1.7, respectively. Thirteen patients (70%) required hardware removal at an average time of 19 ± 4 months due to a local nuisance.

Conclusions

MCW-DFO can improve symptoms in patients with osteoarthritis in a valgus knee at medium- to long-term follow-up, reducing the progression of osteoarthritis in properly selected patients.

[Knee realignment osteotomy in adults]

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, osteotomy near the knee joint for axial deformities has become an indispensable surgical procedure for joint preservation in the orthopaedic-surgical spectrum. The exact localization and analysis of the deformity are crucial to restoring physiological loading conditions of the entire leg by means of a suitable osteotomy.

PROCEDURES

Thus, above all, the medial "open-wedge" osteotomy has established itself as a standard procedure for the treatment of gonarthrosis caused by varus malalignment. Furthermore, the varus closed-wedge osteotomy of the distal femur also shows very good long-term results. Basically, osteotomies close to the knee are causal corrections in which biological and mechanical aspects must be taken into account. Thus, the correct indication, attention to risk factors, and surgical technique determine the long-term success of the procedure. The doctrine of femoral valgus deformity and the resulting lateral arthrosis, on the other hand, must be reconsidered according to the latest knowledge.

Ten-year survival rate of 89% after distal femoral osteotomy surgery for lateral compartment osteoarthritis of the knee

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy, safety, and survival of distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) surgery for lateral compartment OA of the knee.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single UK centre, using prospectively collected data over an 8-year period (2009-2017). All patients had pre-operative radiographic analysis and digital planning of their deformity correction in addition to post-operative analysis of the achieved correction and yearly face-to-face follow-up. Complications (defined as an undesirable medical or surgical event as a direct result of the operation), reoperations, and failure (defined as conversion to arthroplasty or revision) were recorded.

RESULTS

From a total of 83 patients, 81 patients undergoing 86 primary DFOs were included in this study, with a mean follow-up of 99 months (SD 27 months). The mean pre-operative percentage Mikulicz point was 78.7% (SD 19.1%) and post-operative 35.9% (SD 14.8%). The mean accuracy of correction (intended correction - achieved correction) was an 8.2% overcorrection (SD 13.7%). The complication rate was 4.7%. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the mean survival was 113 months (95% CI 106-120) with the probability of surviving 10 years 89%.

CONCLUSION

DFO for valgus alignment and lateral compartment arthritis is associated with low complications, long-term joint preservation, and the prevention of arthroplasty surgery. However, the accuracy of correction still requires improvement in intra-operative technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Medial Biplanar Closing-Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy Using an Articulated Tensioning Device for Controlled Osteotomy Closure

Isolated lateral compartment arthritis or focal chondral defects in the setting of genu valgum in young, active individuals can be treated with a varus-producing distal femoral osteotomy with or without cartilage treatment. Both medial closing-wedge and lateral opening-wedge techniques have been described, with neither demonstrating clear superiority. The objective of this Technical Note is to describe a technique of biplanar medial opening-wedge with controlled reduction using an articulated tensioning device to achieve a safe, reproducible result.

Medical Comorbidities and Functional Dependent Living Are Independent Risk Factors for Short-Term Complications Following Osteotomy Procedures about the Knee

OBJECTIVE

To characterize rates and risk factors for adverse events following distal femoral osteotomy (DFO), high tibial osteotomy (HTO), and tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) procedures.

DESIGN

Patients undergoing DFO, HTO, or TTO procedures during 2005 to 2016 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Rates of adverse events were characterized for each procedure. Demographic, comorbidity, and procedural factors were tested for association with occurrence of any adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 1,083 patients were identified. Of these, 305 (28%) underwent DFO, 273 (25%) underwent HTO, and 505 (47%) underwent TTO. Mean ages for patients undergoing each procedure were the following: DFO, 51 ± 23 years; HTO, 40 ± 13 years; and TTO, 31 ± 11 years. The most common comorbidities for DFO were hypertension (34%) and smoking (17%); for HTO, hypertension (22%) and smoking (21%); and for TTO, smoking (20%) and hypertension (11%). Independent risk factors for occurrence of any adverse event were age ⩾45 years for DFO (odds ratio [OR] = 3.1, P < 0.001) and HTO (OR = 2.3, P = 0.029), and body mass index >30 for HTO (OR = 2.5, 95% confidence interval = 1.1-5.7, P = 0.031). When all osteotomy procedures were analyzed collectively, additional variables including diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.2, P = 0.017), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 5.5, P = 0.003), and dependent functional status (OR = 3.0, P = 0.004) were associated with adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The total rate of adverse events was not independently associated with the type of osteotomy procedure. In addition, patients with age >45, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dependent functional status have greater odds for adverse events and should be counseled and monitored accordingly.

Factors affecting the disparity between preoperative planning and postoperative correction status in distal femoral osteotomy

BACKGROUND

The purposes of this study were to evaluate whether the planning method using the contralateral limb status is reasonable and to determine the disparity between the preoperative planning and actual postoperative correction status by analyzing lateral cortical hinge fractures (LCHFs) in patients who underwent distal femoral osteotomy (DFO).

METHODS

From 2014 to 2018, 31 cases undergoing DFO were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups according to two preoperative planning methods. The disparity between the preoperative planning and the postoperative weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio and clinical scores were compared. Analysis was performed to determine the causes of the disparity by evaluating the osteotomy configuration, including that of LCHFs.

RESULTS

The disparity was observed in the WBL ratio assessment (P < 0.01). In the comparison between two groups, no statistically significant differences were found in the change of WBL ratio (P = 0.78) and postoperative clinical scores. The length of the osteotomy gap was only related to the disparity (R² = 0.22, P = 0.01), while no statistical significance was found for the regression equation of the displaced LCHF (P > 0.05). The length of the remaining bone between the osteotomy end and opposite cortex was significantly associated with the presence of LCHF (odds ratio, 3.904).

CONCLUSIONS

The planning method using a contralateral limb status showed similar results to the classical method, but the two methods produced disparity when the degree of correction was increased. LCHF was mostly related to the remaining bone in the medial closing-wedge DFO.

Effects of lateral opening wedge and medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomies on axial load stability

BACKGROUND

The stability of the current distal femoral osteotomy is insufficient for early weight bearing and bone healing. The purpose of this study was to test the stability of medial closing wedge- (MCW-) and lateral opening wedge-distal femoral osteotomies (LOW-DFO), which have improved with the recent advances in technology.

METHODS

We used composite bone models with MCW-DFO, improved with biplanar osteotomy technique and a Tomofix™ MDF plate, or LOW-DFO improved with biplanar osteotomy technique, a Tomofix™ LDF plate, and a β-TCP bone substitute, BONISH® graft. A cyclic axial loading test was employed to evaluate the strain on a plate and hinge point. The breaking axial load was measured.

RESULTS

Tensile strain on the plate produced by cyclic axial loading was significantly lower for LOW-DFO (2.0 ± 0.8 MPa) than for MCW-DFO (3.9 ± 1.6 MPa, P < .05). Compressive strain on the hinge point produced by cyclic axial loading was lower for LOW-DFO (6.6 ± 2.9 MPa) than for MCW-DFO (7.7 ± 4.6 MPa,). The maximum breaking axial load was significantly higher for LOW-DFO (5511 ± 945 N) than for MCW-DFO (4303 ± 518 N, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

LOW-DFO improved with recent advanced technology was superior to MCW-DFO improved with advanced technology in both cyclic axial loading test and breaking axial load test. This suggests that LOW-DFO facilitates earlier weight bearing and bone healing than does MCW-DFO.

Medial closing-wedge distal femoral varus osteotomy: Symptoms and functional impact in cases of associated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. A two-year follow-up prospective pilot study

PURPOSE

To date, indications for distal femoral varus osteotomy (FVO) in cases of associated patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFO) have yet to be clarified. The purpose of this prospective study is to assess the short-term symptoms, functional and radiological impact of a medial closing-wedge femoral varus osteotomy on the patellofemoral joint in patients with valgus deformities who are afflicted with lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (LTFO) associated with PFO.

METHODS

Fourteen patients (15 knees) received a medial closing-wedge femoral varus osteotomy. The functional impact of an FVO on the patellofemoral joint was assessed based on the KOOS-PF (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Patellofemoral Subscale), the Kujala score and the patellofemoral symptoms. Realignment of the patella was measured by the Merchant's patellofemoral congruence angle. The pre- and post-operative symptoms and functional scores were compiled prospectively and compared two years after the surgery.

RESULTS

The Kujala patellofemoral functional scores and the KOOS-PF showed considerable improvement with a differential of +37.5 points ± 20.4 and +42.7 points ± 19.3 (p < .01) respectively. The average Merchant's congruence angle went from 8.8° laterally to 3.6° medially, resulting in medialization of the patella, with a significant difference (p < .01). Based on the specific clinical analysis of the patellar joint, preoperative J-sign was identified in 26.7% of patients (n = 4) and was not found during postoperative examination (p = .1). Preoperative apprehension test was identified in 33.3% of patients (n = 5) against 13.3% (n = 2) after surgery (p = .39). Preoperative pain extension test was identified in 40% of patients (n = 6) against 20% during postoperative clinical analysis (p = .43).

DISCUSSION

Although the threshold of significance for patellofemoral symptoms was not reached, the medial closing-wedge femoral varus osteotomy induces a significant medialization of the patella (Merchant's congruence angle) and improves short-term functional results even with co-existing patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Due to the lack of specificity of the patellofemoral scores, patellofemoral osteoarthritis improvement is difficult to determine on its own, but does not represent a contraindication to FVO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III. Prospective clinical study.

Distal Femoral Varus Osteotomy for the Valgus Knee after Distal Femoral Growth Plate Fractures in Children: A Case Report

An 18-year-old male suffered a valgus injury to the right knee due to a fall during a bigfoot race he took part in when he was 15 years old. He visited a different hospital at the age of 15. No obvious ligament injury or fracture was noted on MRI and physical examination. However, he gradually became aware of the valgus deformity of the right knee. Finally, he could not take part in a sports activity because of right knee pain. X-ray images at the age of 18 at an initial visit to our department showed severe valgus deformity with mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) of 71 degrees in contrast to left mLDFA which was 87 degrees. We performed a biplane-cut distal femoral varus osteotomy (DFO). Postoperative X-ray images showed an improvement of 86 degrees in mLDFA. Bony fusion was achieved six months after surgery, and he could play several sports activity.

Biomechanical analysis of the centralization procedure for extruded lateral menisci with posterior root deficiency in a porcine model

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical properties of load distribution following a centralization procedure for extruded lateral menisci with posterior root deficiency in a porcine model.

METHODS

Six porcine knee joints were analyzed in a universal tester, as follows: 1) Intact; 2) Extrusion (meniscus extrusion was created by resecting the posterior root of the lateral meniscus, as well as the posterior synovial capsule); and 3) Centralization (two anchors were inserted at the lateral tibial plateau, and the meniscus was sutured to secure it close to the original position). Meniscus extrusion was evaluated using two markers put on the posterior cruciate ligament and the lateral meniscus, and the load distribution were assessed using a pressure mapping sensor system after applying a loading force of 200 N to the knee joint.

RESULTS

Distance between two markers (mm, Average; 95% CI) was larger in the extrusion group (21.9; 17.8, 25.6) than in the intact (18.1; 15.1, 22.7) or the centralization (15.3; 12.9, 18.0) groups. The contact area (mm²) in the middle of the meniscus was significantly smaller in the extrusion group (45.8; 18.5, 73.2) than in the intact (85.7; 72.1, 99.2) or the centralization (98.3; 88.8, 107.8) groups. The maximum contact pressure (MPa) in the tibial plateau was significantly higher in the extrusion group (0.37; 0.35, 0.40) than in the intact (0.29; 0.21, 0.37) or the centralization (0.29; 0.22, 0.36) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The centralization procedure enabled a reduction of the meniscus extrusion in the lateral meniscus with posterior root deficiency and restored the maximum load and contact pressure to values close to those of the normal knee joint.

The Ideal Location of the Lateral Hinge in Medial Closing Wedge Osteotomy of the Distal Femur: Analysis of Soft Tissue Coverage and Bone Density

BACKGROUND

Although an appropriate hinge position to prevent unstable lateral hinge fractures is well established in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy, the position during medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy has not been elucidated.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to evaluate the ideal hinge position that would prevent an unstable lateral hinge fracture during biplanar medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy based on soft tissue coverage and bone density around the hinge area. The hypothesis was that the ideal hinge position could be clarified by analyzing soft tissue coverage and bone density around the lateral hinge area.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

In 20 cadaveric knees (mean age, 70.3 ± 19.2 years), the femoral attachment of the gastrocnemius lateral head was quantitatively analyzed as a soft tissue stabilizer using digital photography and fluoroscopy. Then, medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy was performed, locating the lateral hinge either inside (group 1) or outside (group 2) the femoral attachment of the gastrocnemius lateral head, and the incidence of unstable lateral hinge fractures was compared between the 2 groups. Cortical bone density around the lateral hinge was measured using Hounsfield units on 30 computed tomography scans and reconstructed as a 3-dimensional mapping model. The transitional zone with low bone density was regarded as the safe hinge position with an increased capacity for bone deformation.

RESULTS

The upper and lower margins of the femoral attachment of the gastrocnemius lateral head were 9.1 ± 0.9 mm above and 8.0 ± 1.4 mm below the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle, respectively, and the femoral attachment of the gastrocnemius lateral head was widest in the anteroposterior dimension 0.4 ± 1.7 mm above the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle. The incidence of unstable lateral hinge fractures during osteotomy was significantly decreased in group 1 compared with group 2 (group 1: 0/10; group 2: 5/10; P = .01). An isolated transitional zone with low bone density was observed in all 30 knees and located 1.3 ± 0.8 mm above the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle. Bone density of the transitional zone with low bone density was significantly lower than surrounding femoral cortices (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Only the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle can be recommended as an ideal hinge position to prevent unstable lateral hinge fractures during biplanar medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy based on soft tissue coverage and bone density.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

When the hinge is positioned at the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle during biplanar medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy, the risk of unstable hinge fractures can be minimized.

Closing-Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomies-Retrospective Study

Objective  To describe the surgical technique of distal closing-wedge femoral osteotomy and a cases series submitted to this technique.

Methods  A total of 26 patients submitted to medial closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy from 2002 to 2013 were evaluated. All of the patients had their medical files and imaging exams reviewed to evaluate the degree of correction and their current state.

Results  Out of the 26 patients, 12 were male and 14 were female. Their mean age was 47.15 years old. In all of the cases, a neutral alignment related to the anatomical axis was achieved. Most of the patients presented bone healing at 6 weeks. There were no cases of bleeding during the surgery. One patient presented with delayed bone healing. One patient complained of plaque-related discomfort, requiring the removal of the device. One patient had a superficial infection, but no osteotomy revision was needed. There were no cases of deep venous thrombosis or of pulmonary thromboembolism. To date, there has been no conversion to total knee replacement.

Conclusion  Treatment with medial closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy sustained the proposed correction in patients with up to 15 years of follow-up.

Opening-wedge osteotomies of the distal femur: minor advantages for a biplanar compared to a uniplanar technique

PURPOSE

Valgus malalignment of the distal femur may be treated with corrective osteotomy. The purpose of this study was to compare the primary stability of a lateral opening-wedge osteotomy (LOWO) using a uniplanar compared to a biplanar technique. A study was carried out to test both surgeries, with both an intact medial cortex and with a deliberate attached cut of the medial cortex simulating a fracture. The primary hypothesis was that the biplanar technique provides higher axial and torsional stiffness. It was further hypothesized that the mechanical superiority of the biplanar technique would not be affected in the case of breakage of the far medial cortex.

METHODS

A LOWO was performed in ten synthetic femora (#3406 left large Femur, 4th Generation, Sawbones, Malmö, Sweden) using a lateral angle stable locking plate (NCB© Distal Femur Plate, Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, USA). A uniplanar osteotomy was performed in five femora, and a biplanar osteotomy was performed in five femora. The femora were tested for axial and torsional loads using a servo-hydraulic testing machine (Instron 8874, Instron Structural Testing GmbH, High Wycombe, UK).

RESULTS

Axial stiffness decreased significantly (p = 0.001) in both groups (20% in the uniplanar group and 28 % in the biplanar group) by cutting the medial cortex. The type of osteotomy had no significant effect. A slightly lower but not statistically significant axial stiffness was seen in the biplanar group both for intact and broken medial cortices. Internal torsional stiffness dropped by more than 30% for the uniplanar group and almost 24% for the biplanar group when the cortex was cut (p < 0.001). No significant change concerning internal torsional stiffness was found between the two groups. External torsional stiffness decreased by 32% for the uniplanar group and 4% for the biplanar group after the cortical cut (p = 0.029). No significant change concerning external torsional stiffness was found between the groups, but the biplanar group showed a tendency towards higher values of external torsional stiffness.

CONCLUSIONS

The axial and torsional stiffness of the implant-bone construct were not significantly affected by the type of osteotomy performed. Biplanar osteotomy tended to increase external torsional stiffness. In cases of fracture of the medial cortex, biplanar osteotomy significantly reduced the external rotation at the osteotomy and showed a significantly increased external torsional stiffness.