Dynamic Evaluation of Pivot-Shift Phenomenon in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Triaxial Accelerometer

Preoperative Knee Instability Affects Residual Instability as Evaluated by Quantitative Pivot-Shift Measurements During Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction

Background:

The pivot-shift test is an important indicator of functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Preoperative instability as indicated by the pivot-shift test is associated with residual instability after ACLR. Few studies have used quantitative means to evaluate the pivot shift after ACLR.

Purpose:

To investigate the relationship between preoperative and residual instability and to identify the risk factors for residual instability by using quantitative measurements of the pivot shift.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A total of 91 patients undergoing primary double-bundle ACLR were retrospectively enrolled. Quantitative measurements of instability for ACL-deficient knees (ACLD) and uninjured contralateral knees (intact) preoperatively, as well as ACLR knees intraoperatively, were performed under general anesthesia using the pivot-shift test, with inertial sensors to measure acceleration and external rotational (ER) angular velocity. The ratios of intact to ACLD (ACLD/I) and intact to ACLR (ACLR/I) were measured. Patients who showed an ACLR/I of >1 were classified into the residual instability group, and those with an ACLR/I of ≤1 were classified into the noninstability group. Regarding demographic, surgical, and quantitative measurement factors, between-group comparisons and multivariate logistic regression were conducted for predictors of residual instability. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the correlations between ACLD/I and ACLR/I and the cutoff value of ACLD/I in predicting residual instability.

Results:

The predictive factors for intraoperative residual instability included female sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.3 [95% CI, 0.1-0.9]; P = .034) and ACLD/I for acceleration (OR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.2-2.1]; P < .001), and ACLD/I for ER angular velocity (OR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.2-3.1]; P = .013). Correlations between ACLD/I and ACLR/I were moderate with respect to both acceleration (r = 0.435; P < .001) and ER angular velocity (r = 0.533; P < .001). The cutoff points for ACLD/I were 4.9 for acceleration (sensitivity, 65.1%; specificity, 85.7%; area under the curve [AUC], 0.76) and 2.4 for ER angular velocity (sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 50.0%; AUC, 0.74).

Conclusion:

Greater preoperative instability was a risk factor for residual instability as measured intraoperatively by a quantitatively evaluation in the pivot shift during ACL reconstruction. Quantitative measurements of instability during the pivot shift mechanism under general anesthesia may enable surgeons to predict postoperative residual instability.

Objectifying the Pivot Shift Test

The pivot shift test is utilized for assessment of rotatory instability in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient knee. There are multiple reports of the pivot shift maneuver, and there is a lack of consensus among clinicians as to a standardized maneuver. Measurement devices are a feasible option to evaluate rotatory knee instability, objectively or quantitatively. Traditionally, measurement systems have been invasive systems. More recently, electromagnetic system, inertial sensor, or imaging analysis systems, specifically with the utilization of a tablet computer, have emerged as noninvasive, and more importantly, validated options. It is important to recognize that anatomic structures other than the ACL contribute to rotatory knee stability. Addressing the tibial slope, anterolateral structures of the knee, specifically the iliotibial band, and menisci during ACL surgery may decrease residual pivot shift in an attempt to improve clinical outcomes and prevent reinjury. This review article describes the pivot shift maneuver, objective measurement tools, and clinical applications of the pivot shift test.

Risk factors for residual anterolateral rotational instability after double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Evaluation by quantitative assessment of the pivot shift phenomenon using triaxial accelerometer

BACKGROUND

Exact knowledge of risk factors for residual anterolateral rotatinoal instability (ALRI) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is limited. The purpose of this study was to analyse possible risk factors for ALRI after ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

Quantitative assessment of the pivot shift phenomenon by measuring tibial acceleration was performed in 46 patients during primary double-bundle ACL reconstructions. The absolute value of the acceleration of the injured knee after provisional fixation of the ACL grafts ('absolute residual acceleration') and the subtraction of the acceleration of the uninjured knee from absolute residual acceleration ('relative residual acceleration') were defined as indicators for residual ALRI. The associations between these indicators and nine candidate risk factors were analysed using univariate and multiple regression analyses.

RESULTS

Multiple regression analysis revealed that absolute residual acceleration was positively associated with both preoperative acceleration difference between injured and uninjured knees (β = 0.469, P < 0.001) and tibial acceleration of the uninjured knee (β = 0.597, P < 0.001). Relative residual acceleration was also positively associated with preoperative acceleration difference between injured and uninjured knees (β = 0.446, P< 0.001), but was negatively associated with tibial acceleration of the uninjured knee (β = -0.763, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with larger preoperative side-to-side difference of the pivot shift phenomenon have higher risk for both absolute and relative residual ALRIs after ACL reconstruction, whereas patients with larger pivot shift phenomenon in their uninjured knees are at higher risk for absolute residual ALRI but not for relative residual ALRI.

The effect of a longitudinal tear of the medial meniscus on medial meniscal extrusion in anterior cruciate ligament injury patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a longitudinal tear of the medial meniscus (MM) and its meniscal repair on MM extrusion in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured patients. The hypothesis underlying this study was that a longitudinal tear of the MM is correlated with MM extrusion, and that the extrusion would persist after ACL reconstruction with concomitant MM repair.

METHODS

Forty-three ACL-injured patients with a concomitant MM longitudinal tear were included in the MM tear group. Thirty-four solely ACL-injured patients without any meniscal injuries were included in the Control group. Medial meniscus extrusion width (MEW) was measured pre-operatively and three months after surgery on magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Pre-operative MEW in the MM tear group was significantly larger than that in the Control group (MM tear group: 1.5 mm, Control: 0.3 mm, P < 0.001). The MEW change in the MM tear group was significantly greater than that in the Control group three months after operation (MM tear group: 0.8 mm, Control: -0.2 mm, P < 0.001). The number of sutures required for repair was correlated with MEW both pre-operatively and postoperatively in the MM tear group (pre-operative: P = 0.005, R = 0.42, postoperative: P < 0.001, R = 0.54).

CONCLUSION

Longitudinal tear of the MM was correlated with MM extrusion and the MM extrusion persisted after ACL reconstruction with concomitant MM repair in the MM tear group. The initial meniscal tear size was directly correlated with the pre-operative MEW. Therefore, meniscal extrusion after longitudinal tears of the medial meniscus should be taken into careful consideration.

Contribution of Additional Anterolateral Structure Augmentation to Controlling Pivot Shift in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Several types of anterolateral structure (ALS) augmentation procedures in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been reported. However, information is limited regarding the effect of additional ALS augmentation on rotatory stability in a clinical setting.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

This study aimed to investigate the contribution of additional ALS augmentation in ACL reconstruction in cases with a high risk of residual pivot shift. The 2 hypotheses were as follows. First, additional ALS augmentation would improve rotatory stability as compared with solely reconstructing the ACL. Second, graft tension changes would be different between the ACL and ALS during knee range of motion and against anterior or rotatory loads.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Fifteen patients who met at least 1 of the following criteria were included: (1) revision ACL reconstruction, (2) preoperative high-grade pivot shift, or (3) hyperextended knee. The pivot-shift test was performed preoperatively and during surgery after ACL reconstruction and after additional ALS augmentation with acceleration measurements from a triaxial accelerometer. The tension changes of the ACL and ALS grafts were also measured during knee range of motion and against manual maximum anterior tibial translation, internal rotation, and external rotation.

RESULTS

After ACL reconstruction, the pivot-shift acceleration was still greater than that of the uninjured knee. However, additional ALS augmentation further reduced acceleration when compared with ACL reconstruction alone in both primary and revision cases (P < .05 vs preoperative, P < .05 vs ACL). During knee flexion-extension, the tension of the ACL increased as the knee was extended, whereas that of the ALS did not change. Graft tension of the ACL and ALS became higher with internal rotation and lower with external rotation as compared with the neutral position. Tension of the ACL was significantly increased against anterior tibial translational loads, whereas that of the ALS was not.

CONCLUSION

Additional ALS augmentation further improved the rotatory stability during ACL reconstruction in patients with a high risk of residual pivot shift at the time of surgery. Significant differences in graft tension changes were also observed between the ACL and ALS against different loads. Additional ALS augmentation may be considered to eliminate the pivot shift in patients with a high risk of residual pivot shift.

Greater Laxity in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Knee Carries a Higher Risk of Postreconstruction Pivot Shift: Intraoperative Measurements With a Navigation System

BACKGROUND

The presence of pivot shift after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is correlated with worse clinical outcomes. An orthopaedic navigation system is a useful tool for quantifying laxity in the ACL-deficient knee.

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between preoperative knee laxity measured by a navigation system and postoperative pivot shift (PPS) after ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

One hundred patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction (62 hamstring tendon grafts, 38 patellar tendon grafts) were grouped according to the presence or absence of pivot shift at the 2-year follow-up, and the groups were compared retrospectively. Before surgery, knee laxity was assessed with a navigation system to quantify posterior tibial reduction (PTR) during pivot-shift tests and anterior tibial translation (ATT) during Lachman tests. PTR and ATT cutoff values were determined by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Preoperative PTR and ATT were significantly larger for patients with PPS (PPS-positive group) than those without (PPS-negative group). In the ROC analysis, the PTR had an area under the curve of 0.871 (95% CI, 0.763-0.979; P < .0001) for predicting a PPS; this was larger than that obtained for the ATT, which had an area under the curve of 0.825 (95% CI, 0.705-0.946; P = .001). Because the ROC curve of the ATT had 2 peaks, the ATT alone was not a suitable predictor for PPS. Based on the ROC curve, the optimal PTR cutoff value was 7 mm, with 88.9% sensitivity and 71.4% specificity for PPS (adjusted odds ratio = 19.7; 95% CI, 2.1-187.9; P = .009). Setting the cutoff value as a combination of the PTR (≧7 mm) and ATT (≧12 mm) improved the specificity (88.9% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity; adjusted odds ratio = 149.8; 95% CI, 5.9-3822.7; P = .002) over that with the PTR alone.

CONCLUSION

ACL injuries in knees with a large PTR had a higher risk of PPS. When reconstructing the ACL in a knee with a high degree of laxity, surgeons may need to adopt strategies to prevent PPS.