Biomechanical Comparison of Open and Arthroscopic Transosseous Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Foveal Tears: A Cadaveric Study

Biomechanical Analysis of Transosseous Repair Versus Combined Transosseous With Capsular Repair for Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears With Instability

PURPOSE

This study compared the biomechanical stability of transosseous repair and transosseous combined with capsular repair techniques to reattach the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) for distal radioulnar joint instability.

METHODS

Eight adult cadaveric upper-extremity specimens were studied. Each underwent peripheral ulnar-sided detachment of the deep and superficial TFCC fibers and repair. Four groups were prepared sequentially: intact TFCC, disrupted TFCC, transosseous repair, and combined transosseous with capsular repair. Forearm rotational torque was measured in three wrist positions: 60° flexion, neutral position, and 60° extension. Maximum dorsal and palmar ulnar translations in response to a 20-N traction load were measured at nine wrist positions after stabilizing the humerus and radius. Measurements were taken before and after TFCC disruption and following repair.

RESULTS

Clear instability of the radius relative to the ulna was observed after sectioning the deep and superficial fibers of the TFCC, and stability was markedly improved after reconstruction in all positions. Compared with the normal group, rotational torque was similar between the two repair methods. In the pronation palmar flexion and supination dorsal extension positions, dorsal-palmar translation was smaller in the combined transosseous with capsular repair group than in the transosseous repair-alone group.

CONCLUSIONS

Triangular fibrocartilage complex deep fibers are the primary stabilizing structure of the distal radioulnar joint. In this cadaveric study, the combined transosseous with capsular repair technique demonstrated less dorsal-palmar translation compared with the transosseous-alone repair technique.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Combined transosseous with capsular repair is expected to provide improved postoperative stability for patients with peripheral TFCC tears and distal radioulnar joint instability.

Clinical Outcomes and Failure Rate of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Foveal Repair Were Comparable between Arthroscopic and Open Techniques

Background: This study compared clinical outcomes between arthroscopic and open repair of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) foveal tears in chronic distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability patients. Methods: A total of 79 patients who had gone through foveal repair of TFCC using arthroscopic technique (n = 35) or open technique (n = 44) between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, active range of motion (ROM), grip strength, Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire score, and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score at 2-4-6-12-24 months postoperatively were compared between two groups. Results: Two years after the operation, clinical parameters (VAS, MMWS, DASH, and PRWE), grip strength, and ROM showed significant advancement in the two groups in comparison to their values measured preoperatively (p < 0.001). Nonetheless, we could not identify any statistically significant differences in the above clinical factors between the two groups. The arthroscopic group showed a better flexion-extension arc at 2 months and supination-pronation arc at 2 and 4 months than the open group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups at 2 years postoperatively. Ten patients (12.6%) had recurrent instability (three in the arthroscopic group and seven in the open group, p = 0.499). Similarly, both groups showed no significant difference in the return to work period. Conclusions: Arthroscopic foveal repair of TFCC provided similarly favorable outcomes and early recovery of pain and ROM compared to open repair.

Comparing the Outcomes of Suture Anchor Repair and Rein-Type Capsular Suture for Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Foveal Tears With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

Recent biomechanical studies have highlighted the importance of foveal reinsertion when repairing triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injury with foveal tears. However, clinical studies comparing different repair techniques are scarce. We compared the clinical outcomes of suture anchor repair and rein-type capsular suture in patients with TFCC palmer 1B foveal tears with a minimum of 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

This was a single-surgeon, single-center, retrospective, comparative study. We included patients who underwent TFCC repair surgery due to a foveal tear from December 2013 to October 2018 with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Postoperative Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, Modified Mayo Wrist Score, visual analogue scale for pain, wrist range of motion, and grip strength were compared. We also measured the maximal ulnar head displacement with dynamic ultrasound to quantify distal radioulnar joint stability.

RESULTS

In total, 103 patients were in the suture anchor group (group A) and 84 patients in the rein-type capsular suture group (group B). The mean follow-up time exceeded three years for both groups. There was a minimal difference regarding QuickDASH score, visual analogue scale for pain, and grip strength ratio between the two groups. The rein-type group had significantly better Modified Mayo Wrist Score. The suture anchor group showed better distal radioulnar joint stability with dynamic ultrasound, but was more limited in ulnar deviation. However, these differences are most likely clinically insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

Both suture anchor repair and rein-type capsular suture yielded satisfactory results for TFCC 1B foveal tear in a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The functional scores were similar, and no major complications or recurrent instability were noted in either group.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective Therapeutic Comparative Investigation IV.

Effectiveness of suture anchor and transosseous suture technique in arthroscopic foveal repair of the triangular fibrocartilage complex: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Currently, there were two major surgical methods for arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) foveal repair: suture anchor (SA) and transosseous suture (TOS). The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the relevant outcome improvement and safety of SA and TOS technique.

METHODS

Literature review of electronic databases for studies investigating the effects of SA and TOS in patients undergoing arthroscopic TFCC foveal repair was performed. We compared the pre-operative and postoperative functional outcomes, clinical outcomes [pain, range of motion (ROM) and grip strength], and complications of two methods. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was used to determine clinically meaningful improvement.

RESULTS

There were 1263 distinct studies identified, with 26 (904 patients) meeting the inclusion criteria. The mean age of participants ranged from 21.4 to 41 years, and the mean follow-up time ranged from 6 to 106 months. Both SA and TOS groups reported significant improvement in the modified mayo wrist score, the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, quick DASH score, patient-reported wrist evaluation (PRWE) score, and the visual analog scale (VAS) score. According to MCID, all the studies from both groups reporting DASH, quick DASH, PRWE and VAS score achieved clinically meaningful improvement. (MCID: 10 for DASH, 14 for quick DASH, 14 for PRWE and 1.6-18 for VAS). The ROM changes in both groups varied from improvement to deterioration. Grip strength improved in both SA and TOS group. Most complications were self-limited. The reoperation rates in SA and TOS ranged from 0 to 20% and 0 to 27.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SA and TOS technique for arthroscopic TFCC foveal repair could achieve improvement in postoperative functional outcomes, pain, and grip strength with low reoperation rate. However, the ROM improvement was still inconclusive.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

Systematic review of level III and IV studies.

Biomechanical Outcomes of Surgically Repaired TFCC Palmer Type 1B Tears: A Systematic Review of Cadaver Studies

BACKGROUND

Palmer type 1B triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears are a common cause of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. Unfortunately, the best surgical technique for TFCC reinsertion is still unknown, and up to a quarter of patients report instability after repair. The purpose of this systematic review of cadaver studies was to compare the biomechanical outcomes of different surgical techniques used for Palmer 1B TFCC tears.

METHODS

A systemic review of all cadaver studies published before January 2022 was performed using the PubMed and EMBASE databases. Only cadaver studies on reinsertion techniques for Palmer type 1B lesions were included. Biochemical outcome parameters evaluated were stability of the DRUJ and strength of the repair.

RESULTS

A total of 248 articles were identified. Five articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Four different surgical techniques were identified. In 3 studies, transosseous tunnel repair was tested and resulted in the most stable DRUJ and strongest TFCC repair compared with the suture anchor repair, the peripheral capsular repair, and the outside-in repair.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the transosseous tunnel repair might be a good technique for restoring DRUJ stability. However, more cadaver studies are needed to identify the most optimal technique.

Biomechanical evaluation of interference screw fixation techniques for distal radioulnar ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric experimental study

INTRODUCTION

In the reconstruction of distal radioulnar ligaments (DRULs), interference screws can be used for antegrade or retrograde fixation of grafts to the ulna. However, the biomechanics of interference screw fixation are currently unknown. This study aimed to determine the biomechanical effects of these two fixations on the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) in a cadaveric model and to investigate the appropriate initial tension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 30 human cadaver upper extremities were used, and the DRULs were reconstructed according to Adams' procedure. First, eight specimens were randomly divided into two groups: antegrade and retrograde, followed by translational testing and load testing. Then, the other eight specimens were divided into the two groups above, and the contact mechanics, including forces, areas, and pressures, were measured. Finally, to investigate the appropriate initial tension, the remaining 14 specimens were fixed with interference screws under different tensions in an antegrade way, and the translational testing was repeated as before.

RESULTS

In the neutral position, antegrade fixation exhibited less translation than retrograde fixation (7.21 ± 0.17 mm versus 10.77 ± 1.68 mm, respectively). The maximum failure load was 70.45 ± 6.20 N in antegrade fixation, while that in retrograde fixation was 35.17 ± 2.95 N (P < 0.0001). Antegrade fixation exhibited a larger increase in contact force than retrograde fixation (99.72% ± 23.88% versus 28.18% ± 10.43%) (P = 0.001). The relationship between tension and displacement was nonlinear (Y = - 1.877 ln(x) + 7.94, R² = 0.868, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with retrograde fixation, the antegrade fixation of interference screws may be a more reliable surgical technique, as it shows a higher failure load and stability. In addition, to avoid the risk of potential arthritis caused by anterograde fixation, we propose an equation to determine the appropriate initial tension in DRUL reconstruction.

Midterm Results of Arthroscopy-Assisted "Tent Form" Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Repair With Dorsal Distal Radioulnar Joint Capsule Imbrication for Posttraumatic Chronic Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of "tent form" triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) repair combined with dorsal distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) capsule imbrication for posttraumatic chronic DRUJ instability.

METHODS

All patients treated with arthroscopic "tent form" TFCC repair and DRUJ capsule imbrication from 2016 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were symptomatic chronic DRUJ instability for >6 months and dorsal DRUJ subluxation on magnetic resonance imaging. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, grip strength, Modified Mayo Wrist Score, range of motion, and distal radioulnar joint stability were assessed for a minimum of 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were included in the final analysis. The average follow-up duration was 35.6 months (range, 24-48 months). The 24-month postoperative grip strengths and 3-dimensional motions of wrist were not significantly different from that of the nonoperated wrist. Compared with their preoperative status, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, and Modified Mayo Wrist Score indicated the significant improvement with P values of .001, .001, and .002, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In chronic DRUJ instability with a loosening dorsal capsule, "tent form" TFCC transcapsular repair combined with DRUJ capsule imbrication restored the integrity of TFCC and dorsal DRUJ capsule and achieved a promising outcome. We recommend this procedure as an option of treatment for patients with posttraumatic chronic DRUJ instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, case series.

The rein-type arthroscopic capsular suture for triangular fibrocartilage complex foveal tears: midterm results for 90 patients

We describe an arthroscopic rein-type capsular suture that approximates the triangular fibrocartilage complex to the anatomical footprint, and report the results at a minimum 12 month follow-up. The procedure involves two 3-0 polydioxanone horizontal mattress sutures inserted 1.5 cm proximal to the 6-R and 6-U portals to obtain purchase on the dorsal and anterior radioulnar ligaments, respectively. The two sutures work as a rein to approximate the triangular fibrocartilage complex to the fovea. Ninety patients with Type IB triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries were included retrospectively. The 12-month postoperative Modified Mayo Wrist scores, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores and visual analogue scale for pain showed significant improvements on preoperative values. Postoperative range of wrist motion, grip strength and ultrasound assessment of the distal radioulnar joint stability were comparable with the normal wrist. The patients had high satisfaction scores for surgery. There were minor complications of knot irritation. No revision surgery for distal radioulnar joint instability was required. It is an effective and technically simple procedure that provides a foveal footprint contact for the triangular fibrocartilage complex.Level of evidence: IV.

Comparative outcomes between all-inside arthroscopic suture anchor technique versus arthroscopic transosseous suture technique in patients with triangular fibrocartilage complex tear: a retrospective comparative study

Background

Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) has become an interest over the last few decades, discovering its understanding in anatomy, pathomechanism, biomechanics, and management in treatments. Currently, TFCC does not have a golden standard procedure, and not one surgical procedure is superior to the other. This study is to evaluate the comparative outcomes in TFCC patients that underwent either in all-inside arthroscopic suture anchors or the arthroscopic transosseous suture technique.

Method

From 2017 to 2019, 30 patients were analyzed. Eight patients were in an arthroscopic transosseous group and 22 patients were in an all-inside arthroscopic group. Comparison between patients’ flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and visual analog pain scale (VAS) preoperative and six-month follow-up were analyzed.

Result

There were significant increases in flexion ROM, extension ROM, and VAS between preoperative and postoperative in all-inside arthroscopic and arthroscopic transosseous. Only the all-inside arthroscopic group had a significant increase in grip strength. Postoperative flexion ROM had a significant difference between all-inside arthroscopic and arthroscopic transosseous.

Conclusion

Both the all-inside arthroscopic suture anchor technique and the arthroscopic transosseous suture technique are appropriate treatments to treat patients with TFCC. Both procedures have achieved the ultimate goal of improved longevity and optimal function.

Level of evidence

Level III; retrospective comparative cohort study.

Arthroscopic Transosseous Repair of Foveal Tears of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

To determine whether arthroscopic transosseous foveal repair of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) results in significant and clinically relevant improvement in clinical outcomes including pain and function with low complication and reoperation rates.

METHODS

We reviewed studies investigating the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic transosseous foveal repair of the TFCC through MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies on TFCC repair performed with an open or capsular technique and combined with other procedures, such as ulnar shortening osteotomy and a wafer procedure, were excluded. Methodologic quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies score. Clinical outcomes were assessed using range of motion, grip strength, and patient-reported outcomes. Clinically relevant improvement was determined using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

RESULTS

A total of 443 unique studies were identified, of which 7 (131 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The mean age ranged from 27 to 37 years, and the mean follow-up period ranged from 23.5 to 31.1 months. The grip strength (as a percentage) increased after foveal repair of the TFCC in all studies (mean difference range, 11.8% to 22.3%). All studies also reported an improvement in the visual analog scale score (mean difference range, -9.8 to -1.88); Modified Mayo Wrist Score (mean difference range, 10.5 to 27); and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (mean difference range, -51.8 to -24.48). Considering clinically relevant improvements based on the MCID, 4 of 5 studies reporting the visual analog scale score showed improvements in this score (MCID, 2) and all studies reporting the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score showed improvements in this score (MCID, 10). Most complications recovered without any treatment, and 3 patients (2.29%) needed a reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic transosseous foveal repair of the TFCC resulted in improvements in grip strength and functional outcomes with low complication and reoperation rates. However, the evidence for which technique produces better clinical outcomes remains limited.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.

Mid- and Long-Term Outcome After Arthroscopically Assisted Transosseous Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Refixation-Good to Excellent Results in Spite of Some Loss of Stability of the Distal Radioulnar Joint

PURPOSE

To evaluate mid- and long-term outcomes after arthroscopically-assisted transosseous reattachment of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and to analyze the association of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) stability with the clinical outcome.

METHODS

Patients treated with an arthroscopically-assisted transosseous reattachment of the deep layer of the TFCC between 2000 and 2009 and a minimum follow-up of 12 months at mid-term and 4 years at long-term follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS); Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; pain visual analogue scale (VAS); grip strength and stability of the DRUJ were assessed at 2 follow-up clinical examinations. At the last follow-up, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score was additionally recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with a mean age of 29 (±13) years were included. Most of the patients were female (70%, n = 21). The mid-term evaluation took place at a median of 30 months (range, 12-83 months). The assessed scores showed statistically significant clinical improvement (MMWS, P < .001; DASH score P < .001; VAS P < .001). Stability assessment showed a stable DRUJ in 23 (76.7%) patients. At a median of 106 months (range 52-215 months), the long-term clinical assessment was performed. The evaluated scores demonstrated persisting significant improvement (MMWS P < .001; DASH score P < .001; VAS P < .001). Stability assessment showed a stable DRUJ in 19 patients (63.3%). DRUJ instability did not correlate with clinical outcome. No permanent surgery-related complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopically-assisted transosseous reattachment of the deep fibers of radioulnar ligaments leads to excellent and good clinical results in mid- and long-term follow-up. In 95.5% of the analyzed patients, the measured improvement in the DASH score exceeded the in literature reported minimal clinically important difference of 13.5. Loss of DRUJ stability during follow-up was not associated with deterioration of clinical parameters and patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Editorial Commentary: Outcomes of Arthroscopic Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Repair: Can We Predict Who Will Benefit or Not?

The arthroscopic repair of avulsed triangular fibrocartilage complex generally demonstrates a satisfactory outcome after ruling out additional combined pathologies for ulnar-sided wrist pain. Previous studies have reported that 10% to 20% of patients complain of dissatisfaction with this surgical treatment, suggesting that it is not effective for all patients. Several prognostic factors for poor outcomes such as female gender, chronicity, baseline functional state, and reduced pronator quadratus muscle mass have been proposed. Transosseus foveal repair may be particularly beneficial in chronic cases compared with capsular repair, enhancing the healing rate between the scarred end of the triangular fibrocartilage complex and the bone with greater mechanical strength. However, unaccounted patient variables in uncontrolled small cases series could significantly complicate and confound the point of care application of the findings, and thus larger comprehensive studies are required to confirm these results.

Prognostic factors for the outcome of arthroscopic capsular repair of peripheral triangular fibrocartilage complex tears

BACKGROUND

Little information is available about prognostic factors of arthroscopic capsular repair for peripheral triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) lesions. The purpose of this study was to analyze factors that affect the treatment outcomes of arthroscopic capsular repair for peripheral TFCC tears.

METHODS

This study retrospectively enrolled 60 patients who were treated with arthroscopic outside-in capsular repair for peripheral TFCC tears. Functional survey, including pain numeric rating scale (NRS) on an ulnar provocation test, distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) stress test, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and satisfaction with treatment, was conducted at 12-month follow-up. Patients who were enthusiastic or satisfied comprised the satisfied group, and those who were noncommittal or disappointed the dissatisfied group. Demographic, clinical, and arthroscopic findings were compared between the satisfied and dissatisfied groups.

RESULTS

The mean pain NRS and DASH scores exhibited significant clinical improvement at the 12-month follow-up. Out of the total participants, 46 were satisfied and 14 were dissatisfied about the treatment, with significantly more female subjects in the dissatisfied group than in the satisfied one. The patients in the satisfied group had a shorter duration of symptoms, were more likely to have trauma history, and exhibited positive DRUJ stress test results compared to the dissatisfied group. There were no significant group differences in age, hand dominance, work level, and the extent of ulnar plus variance. Multivariable analysis revealed that female gender, a longer duration of symptoms, or negative DRUJ stress test results were associated with an increased disability after arthroscopic TFCC repair.

CONCLUSION

Female gender, a longer duration of symptom, and a negative DRUJ stress test are associated with a higher likelihood of treatment failure after arthroscopic outside-in capsular repair of peripheral TFCC tears.