Research Pearls: The Significance of Statistics and Perils of Pooling

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis With Intact Rotator Cuffs: A Meta-Analyses

Traditional practice favors total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (PGHO) with an intact rotator cuff; however, the indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have expanded to include PGHO. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the mean differences in the range of motion and patient-reported outcomes between the TSA and RSA with an intact rotator cuff and to analyze the subgroup of the Walch type B2 glenoid. This IRB-exempt, PROSPERO-registered systematic review strictly followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A literature search of five databases revealed 493 articles, of which 10 were included for quantitative synthesis. Level III evidence studies with the diagnosis of PGHO and ≥2 years of follow-up were included. Studies without preoperative and postoperative data were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the methodologic quality of the included studies. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion and patient-reported outcomes were collected. The random-effects model was employed, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There were a total of 544 and 329 studies in the TSA group and RSA group, respectively. The mean age in the TSA group and RSA groups were 65.36 ± 7.06 and 73.12 ± 2.40, respectively (p = 0.008). The percentages of males in the TSA and RSA groups were 73.2% and 51.1%, respectively (p = 0.02). The mean differences in forward elevation, external rotation in adduction, internal rotation scale, visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores were improved for both groups with no significant differences between the two. There were 9.6 times the revisions in the TSA group (8.8% vs. 0.91%; p = 0.014) and 1.5 times the complications in the TSA group (3.68% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.0096). Two hundred and forty-two glenoids were identified as Walch type B2 (126 in the TSA group and 116 in the RSA group). The mean ages in the B2 subgroup were 68.20 ± 3.25 and 73.03 ± 1.49 for the TSA and RSA, respectively (p = 0.25). The percentages of males in the B2 subgroup were 74.6% and 46.5% for the TSA and RSA groups, respectively (p = 0.0003). The ASES, SANE, forward elevation, and external rotation in the adduction results were descriptively summarized for this subgroup, with average mean differences of 49.0 and 51.2, 45.7 and 66.1, 77.6° and 58.6°, and 38.6° and 34.1° for the TSA and RSA groups, respectively. In the setting of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff, the RSA has a similar range of motion and clinical outcomes but lower complication and revision rates as compared to the TSA. This may hold true in the setting of the B2 glenoid, although a high-powered study on this subgroup is required. Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty maintains an important role in select patients. Further studies are required to better elucidate the role of glenoid bone loss and posterior humeral head subluxation with regard to implant choice.

Intra-articular corticosteroid injections provide a clinically relevant benefit compared to placebo only at short-term follow-up in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To quantify the clinical relevance of intra-articular corticosteroid effects compared to placebo for the injective treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched on May 3, 2023. This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published in English, with no time limitation regarding publication date, comparing intra-articular corticosteroids and placebo injections for knee OA. The effects were quantified at short- (≤6 weeks), mid- (>6 weeks and ≤3 months), and long-term (≥6 months) follow-ups. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the outcomes (visual analogue scale for pain - VAS: 1.4, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index - WOMAC: 9) was used to interpret the clinical improvement provided by intra-articular corticosteroid injections compared to placebo. The quality of each article was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and the GRADE guidelines.

RESULTS

Among the 1030 articles retrieved, 11 RCTs (842 patients) were included. A comparison of the two groups revealed statistically significant differences in the improvement of VAS and WOMAC scores in terms of the mean difference (MD); this difference was in favour of corticosteroids at short-term (p < 0.001, MD = -1.6 and p < 0.001, MD = -9.9, respectively) and mid-term follow-ups (p = 0.001, mean MD = -1.3 and p = 0.005, MD = -4.9, respectively). No difference was observed at the long-term follow-up. The MDs between the improvements in the two groups reached the MCID values for the VAS and WOMAC only at the short-term follow-up. The RoB 2 tool and the GRADE evaluations showed the presence of risk of bias and limited quality of evidence.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that intra-articular corticosteroid injections offer clinically perceivable pain relief and functional improvement higher than the placebo effect only at short-term follow-up in patients affected by knee OA, with benefits losing clinical relevance already after 6 weeks. These results, together with the low number and the limited quality of the RCTs comparing this treatment with placebo, question the indication for the use of corticosteroid injections in clinical practice for the treatment of knee OA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Primary Fibular Osteomyelitis in Children: A Systematic Review

Osteomyelitis of the fibula is rare and is especially rare in children. The published literature is limited to case series and is thus lacking a comprehensive description of the disease. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide the first comprehensive summary of the demographics, presenting symptoms, laboratory values, microbiology, and treatment results of osteomyelitis of the fibula in children based on the existing literature. This institutional review board (IRB)-exempt systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines. Three search engines were used for a total of 239 studies. Twenty-six studies were screened by full text. Twelve articles underwent a quantitative analysis. Due to limited data and heterogenous reporting, the data were summarized descriptively. The methodologic quality of the studies was evaluated based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The average age was 7.71±3.49 years, and males comprised 57% of the 21 cases. The most common presenting symptoms were fever (86%), antalgic gait (57%), and localized tenderness (81%). The most common site of involvement was the distal third of the fibula (90%). The average C-reactive protein (CRP) was 90.1±38.3 mg/L, and the average erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 58.8±21.2 mm/hour. Staphylococcus aureus was the most cultured pathogen reported in 10/21 cases (48%). Open surgery was performed in 17/21 cases (81%), and there were no reported complications. Fever, antalgic gait, and localized tenderness should raise the index of suspicion. Prompt laboratory and radiographic evaluations can help reduce delays in diagnosis and improve outcomes. Blood and tissue cultures are currently performed in about half of the cases. Improvement in our microbiologic diagnosis has the potential to improve antibiotic selection. Local methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence must be taken into consideration when starting empiric antibiotic treatment. Surgical treatment is often required with a low complication rate. The clinical and laboratory parameters identified in this study have the potential for integration into a composite clinical score.

Evidence-Based Practice Should Supersede Evidence-Based Medicine Through Consideration of Clinical Experience and Patient Characteristics in Addition to the Published Literature

On the surface, the benefits of evidence-based medicine (EBM) seem self-evident. However, reliance on the scientific literature alone has limitations. Studies may be biased, statistically fragile, and/or not reproducible. Reliance solely on EBM may ignore physician clinical experience and individual patient characteristics and input. Reliance solely on EBM may overvalue quantitative, statistical significance, resulting in a false sense of certainty. Reliance solely on EBM may fail to consider lack of generalizability of published studies to individually unique patients. The concept of evidence-based practice goes beyond EBM and incorporates (1) EBM, (2) clinical expertise, and (3) individual patient characteristics, values, and preferences. Even if branded as evidence-based, a suggested treatment may not be the best treatment. Evidence-based practice must be considered before determining what is best for our patients.

Quadriceps Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Postoperative Rehabilitation and Complication Profiles

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study are to explore current elements for postoperative rehabilitation protocol after quadriceps tendon-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (QT-ACLR), outline general timelines for progression of those elements, and explore their associated complication rates and profiles.

METHODS

In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, 5 online databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PubMed) were searched and screened in duplicate using predetermined criteria for studies on the aforementioned patient population. Descriptive statistics are presented.

RESULTS

A total of 56 studies were included, with 31 studies using quadriceps tendon with bone block (B-QT) and 26 studies using all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (S-QT). The majority of studies permitted full weightbearing and range of motion (ROM) within the first 12 postoperative weeks, and motion-controlled braces within 6 weeks. Isometric exercises were initiated within 1 week after surgery, closed-chain exercises within 12 weeks, and open-chain and sports-specific exercises within 36 weeks. Complication profiles were similar between graft types and included graft failure (1.2%-1.6%), cyclops syndrome (0.4%-0.7%), and persistent stiffness (0.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Current postoperative rehabilitation strategies in ACLR with QT offer a complication profile comparable to those reported with other graft types. Based on the included rehabilitation regimen, these protocols should focus on early ROM, specifically on achieving full extension, alongside isometric quadriceps strengthening. Progression to closed- and open-chain exercises should follow in a progressive manner, similar to existing protocols in ACLR. Adjuncts such as motion-controlled bracing and continuous passive motion machines may be used if graft protection is prioritized. This review highlights the need for comparison of defined protocols against one another in the setting of QT-ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

Early functional mobilization for non-operative treatment of simple elbow dislocations: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review aims to elucidate a non-operative rehabilitation program that optimizes recovery based on published approaches and outcomes.

METHODS

Searches of four databases from inception to 1 January 2020 were performed to identify clinical studies addressing the non-operative management of simple elbow dislocations.

RESULTS

Of 2435 studies that were eligible for title screen, 15 studies satisfied inclusion criteria. Three randomized control studies demonstrated that early mobilization expedited the return of range of motion, function and return to work or activities, however, resulted in increased pain within the six-week rehabilitation period compared to Plaster of Paris casting for 21 days. Patients returned to work sooner after early mobilization (10 vs. 18 days; p = 0.02) compared to Plaster of Paris casting. In all studies, early mobilization resulted in similar re-dislocation rates of 1.3% (3/237) versus 2.2% (12/549) in those with Plaster of Paris casting as well as lower incidence of heterotopic ossification (36% vs. 54%). No significant differences between rehabilitation protocols were determined; however, the large majority of recent papers utilized rehabilitation protocols.

CONCLUSION

Early mobilization of simple elbow dislocations results in early return of Range-of-Motion, function and return to work with no increase in complication rates; however, increased pain during the rehabilitation period.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Treated With PRP Injection

Background:

Although several injection-based treatments have been proposed to address knee osteoarthritis (OA), it is often difficult to understand the clinical relevance of the obtained results. The psychometric measures of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) were developed to better interpret study findings.

Purpose:

To establish the MCID and the PASS for the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective score and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients treated with intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for knee OA.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

This study included 215 patients with knee OA (68% men, 32% women; age, 53.2 ± 11.3 years; body mass index, 26.8 ± 4.3 kg/m²) who underwent intra-articular PRP injections. Patients were assessed through the IKDC Subjective score and KOOS subscales, and the MCID and the PASS for both measures were independently calculated at 6 and 12 months post-injection. The MCID was calculated using the value equal to half of the standard deviation of the overall cohort improvement. The PASS was assessed using a 2-point scale (satisfied or not satisfied), with threshold values being detected through a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and the Youden index to maximize the sensitivity and the specificity of the threshold values.

Results:

All scores improved significantly from baseline to 6 months and baseline to 12 months (P < .001 for all scores). All scores were stable from 6 to 12 months except for the KOOS Quality of Life subscale, which improved further (P = .033). For the IKDC, the MCID values were 8.6 and 8.5 points and the PASS scores were 59.7 and 62.1 at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Overall, the MCID and the PASS for all KOOS subscales remained constant at the 2 follow-up points. The percentage of patients who achieved the MCID and the PASS was higher than 85% at both 6 and 12 months post-injection.

Conclusion:

This study provided the MCID and PASS thresholds for the IKDC and KOOS scores in patients with knee OA treated with PRP injections. These psychometric measures may allow a better interpretation of the clinical relevance of injection-based treatment outcomes for knee OA.

Primary Bacterial Pyomyositis in Children: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Tropical pyomyositis has had a recent increase in the United States, Europe, and other nontropical areas. The purpose of this study was to provide an accurate description of the demographics, presenting features, sites of involvement, microbiology, imaging modalities, medical and surgical management, complications, and predictors of clinical course.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science Collection, Scopus, and Embase databases yielding 156 studies. Of these, 23 articles were selected for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The average age at presentation was 8.4±1.9 years with males more commonly affected. Fever, painful limp, and localized pain were the most common presenting symptoms. Pelvis, lower extremity, trunk and spine, in descending order, were the most commonly affected locations. Iliopsoas, obturator musculature, and gluteus musculature were the most commonly affected muscle groups. The mean time to diagnosis was 6.6±3.05 days. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common offending organism. The mean length of hospital stay was 12.0±4.6 days. Medical management alone was successful in 40% of cases (143/361) with an average duration of 9.5±4.0 and 22.7±7.2 days of intravenous and oral antibiotics, respectively. Surgical management consisted of open drainage in 91.3% (199/218) or percutaneous drainage in 8.7% (19/218) of cases. Painful limp, fever, and larger values of white cell count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were associated with an increased need for surgery. Obturator and calf muscle involvement were strongly associated with multifocal involvement. There were 42 complications in 41 patients (11.3%). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus was associated with an increased risk of complications. The most common complications were osteomyelitis, septicemia, and septic arthritis.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary pyomyositis should be considered in cases suggesting pediatric infection. Magnetic resonance imaging is the most commonly used imaging modality; however, ultrasound is useful given its accessibility and low cost. Medical management alone can be successful, but surgical treatment is often needed. The prognosis is favorable. Early diagnosis, appropriate medical management, and potential surgical drainage are required for effective treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-systematic review.

Effect of Vancomycin Soaking on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Biomechanics

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of soaking of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts in vancomycin solution on graft biomechanical properties at the time of implantation.

METHODS

The central third of patellar tendons was harvested from mature bovine knees and prepared as a tendon-only graft or a bone-tendon-bone (BTB) graft. Tendons were wrapped in gauze soaked in vancomycin solution (VS) (5 mg/mL) or normal saline (NS) and left to stand for 30 minutes at room temperature, simulating graft exposure times in the operating room during ACL reconstruction. Tensile testing was carried out on a materials testing system with (1) low-magnitude loading (60 N at 3 mm/s) with repeated testing of tendon-only grafts; and (2) high-magnitude loading (600 N at 10 mm/min) of BTB grafts. For tendon-only grafts, specimens were first wrapped in NS-soaked gauze and underwent testing, with repeated testing performed after wrapping in gauze soaked in VS or buffered VS (pH 7.0). For BTB grafts, specimens were randomly assigned to treatment with VS or NS.

RESULTS

For tendon-only grafts, there was no difference in Young's modulus (YM) after soaking with VS soaking (baseline, 12.69 MPa; treatment, 16.07 ± 4.44 MPa; P = .99) or buffered VS (baseline, 12.45 ± 4.55 MPa; treatment, 15.56 ± 2.83 MPa; P = .99). For BTB grafts, there were no differences in elongation strain (VS, 46.8% ± 7.0%; NS, 31.5% ± 13.5%, P = .19) or YM (VS, 158.4 ± 15.8 MPa; NS, 158.5 ± 23.3 MPa, P = .99).

CONCLUSIONS

According to controlled biomechanical tests, vancomycin soaking of patellar tendon grafts does not adversely affect time-zero material properties.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study suggests that vancomycin wrapping has no immediate adverse effects on the biomechanical properties of ACL grafts. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate the widespread use of vancomycin soaking of tendon grafts for infection prophylaxis during ACL reconstruction.

Management and Complications in Nonoperative Fractures of the Tibial Spine: A Systematic Review

Effective options exist for acute nonoperative management of anterior tibial spine fractures, yet there exists a paucity of literature describing long-term outcomes for these patients. This systematic review thus aims to consolidate management strategies and complications for patients with nonoperative anterior tibial spine fractures. In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, 5 databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Pubmed) were searched and screened in duplicate. Quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. Of 485 studies identified in the initial search, a total of 18 studies involving 369 patients were eligible for this review. These were stratified into 173 type I, 124 type II, and 72 type III injuries as described by Meyers and McKeever. All patients were treated with knee immobilization in either full extension or slight flexion, with possible closed reduction and/or aspiration of hemarthrosis. Complications at final follow-up comprised 33.9% of patients with persistent stiffness, 19.4% persistent instability, 11.1% mechanical symptoms, 6.37 delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 4.9% delayed operative intervention for other complications, and 1.9% extension impingement. Given the lack of comparative studies in this review, definitive conclusions for nonoperative management are difficult to establish on the basis of the current body of literature alone. A modestly higher rate of arthrofibrosis and persistent laxity are seen in higher-grade injuries, however, only a minority of studies stratified complications by Meyers and McKeever classification in this review. A better understanding of variables in treatment decision making require further prospective study focused on the collection of functional and patient-reported outcome measures, whereas also further delineating complications by injury severity.

A Systematic Review of Arthroscopic Versus Open Debridement of the Arthritic Elbow

PURPOSE

To systematically review the available data with regard to clinical and functional outcomes of arthroscopic and open debridement for elbow arthritis to determine the complication rate with transition to arthroscopic surgery.

METHODS

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses protocol, a systematic review was performed including studies reporting clinical and functional outcomes following open or arthroscopic debridement of elbow arthritis. The primary outcome measures analyzed were functional outcome (Mayo Elbow Performance Score), range of motion, and complication rate. Data were extracted for the whole group and then compared between the techniques using ranges and forest plots.

RESULTS

In total, 39 level IV and 3 level III studies with 1097 elbows were eligible for inclusion; 684 elbows were treated using an open technique and 413 using an arthroscopic technique. Regarding functional outcome scores, mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved significantly with comparable magnitude of improvement in both groups (arthroscopic group: range 28-34, open group: range 25-31). Regarding range of motion, mean flexion-extension arc improved significantly in both groups (arthroscopic group: range 8-26°, open group: range 13-49°). The open group had a lower preoperative flexion-extension arc (range 63-96) in comparison with the arthroscopic group (range 84-119). The overall incidence of complications was 5.7% (range 0%-19%) in the arthroscopic group and 6.1% (range 0%-25%) in the open group. The most common complication type was neurologic, with an incidence of 2.1% (range 0%-8%) in the arthroscopic group and 1.9% (range 0%-12%) in the open group. The deep infection rate was 0.7% (range 0%-10%) in the open group with no reported incidence in the arthroscopic group.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review demonstrated good mid-term functional outcomes following debridement arthroplasty of the arthritic elbow. There was no increase in complications with an arthroscopic technique confirming its safety and efficacy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Systematic Review of Level III and IV articles.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Allografts and Autografts in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery: A Systematic Review

Purpose

To evaluate the evidence of the effectiveness and safety of allografts compared to autografts in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Methods

Four electronic databases were systematically searched for eligible randomized controlled studies. Crucial effectiveness outcomes included patient-reported function, activity level and symptoms, clinical knee stability, health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Safety was evaluated through graft failures, revisions, reruptures and complications. The internal validity of the studies was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the strength of the evidence was judged according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Results

Two randomized controlled studies were included: 50 patients were analyzed in the allograft group and 58 in the autograft group. No statistically significant postoperative differences were reported between the groups for patient-reported function, activity levels or symptoms. One study reported a statistically significant difference in instrumented postoperative anteroposterior knee laxity favoring stability in autografts. This difference is, however, not relevant in the clinical setting. Insufficient evidence was found to judge safety outcomes and because complications were poorly measured, and none of the studies reported on graft failure, revision or rerupture rates. The studies were judged with unclear to high risk of bias. The strength of the evidence for effectiveness and safety was judged to be low to very low, according to GRADE.

Conclusions

Allografts may be comparable to autografts for crucial effectiveness outcomes, but insufficient evidence was found to judge crucial safety outcomes due to poor reporting of safety measures and outcomes. Results should be interpreted with caution because there is lack of good-quality evidence to support the superiority of allografts over autografts due to the high risk of bias in the primary studies and overall very low strength of the body of evidence according to GRADE.

Level of Evidence

Systematic review of Level II studies.

Editorial Commentary: Defining Improvement After Arthroscopic Meniscal Surgery-How Much of a Difference Does a Difference Make?

Patient-centered metrics including the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state have been proposed to determine the clinical significance of patient-reported outcome scores. These values allow clinically meaningfully interpretation of changes in scores such that the degree of improvement (minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit) and satisfaction (patient acceptable symptom state) can be determined. When derived in the same study, these values allow analyses to be approached from the perspective of which patients are likely to respond to treatment and what level of improvement and satisfaction they might attain. Although limited to the sample from which they are derived, these metrics go beyond a mean value of an outcome score to provide a patient-centered perspective that informs the clinical significance of patient-reported outcome scores.

Primary Arthroscopic Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical outcomes after primary arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. All English-language literature published from 2000 to 2018 that reported the clinical outcomes after primary arthroscopic repair (AR) of complete tear of the ACL (without augmentation) with a minimum 2-year follow-up was reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. Outcomes included repair failure, reoperation, postoperative knee stability, and patient-reported outcomes. Descriptive statistics are presented. Study quality was evaluated with the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS) and the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) score.

RESULTS

Six studies (2 level III, 4 level IV) were included. The mean MCMS was 62.2. The mean MINORS score for noncomparative studies was 11.8, and for comparative studies, 18. Six studies reported outcomes of 89 patients who underwent AR of the ACL from 2007 to 2016 (age, 8 to 67 years; follow-up, 24 to 110 months). All 6 studies included exclusively proximal avulsion tears. Overall, 0% to 25.0% of patients experienced repair failure (I² = 23.7%; 95% confidence interval, 0% to 67.6%), and 0% to 20.0% of patients had a subsequent reoperation (I² = 12.1%; 95% confidence interval, 0% to 77.7%). Similar inconsistent results were shown for postoperative knee stability measures and patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature on clinical outcomes of primary arthroscopic ACL repair is limited. The reported rates of repair failure and reoperation are highly inconsistent. Most studies report relatively high failure rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.

Methods to Improve Arthroscopic and Orthopaedic Biomechanical Investigations: A Few of Our Favorite Things

Controlled biomechanical studies, generally in vitro (and often ex vivo), may represent a first step in evaluation of a new arthroscopic or orthopedic implant or technique. The purpose and methods of biomechanical studies must be thoughtfully considered to achieve results translatable to a clinically relevant conclusion. A limitation is that with the exception of animal studies or rare human investigations, most biomechanical studies actually only investigate mechanics and do not study biological healing. We review tips and pearls for performing quality biomechanical investigations.

Effectiveness of Dextrose Prolotherapy for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and evaluate the efficacy and complication profile of prolotherapy using hyperosmolar dextrose solution injection for rotator cuff tendinopathy.

LITERATURE SURVEY

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from inception to 1 July, 2019).

METHODOLOGY

A comprehensive search was completed to identify randomized controlled trials addressing prolotherapy using hyperosmolar dextrose solution for rotator cuff tendinopathy. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts, and then extracted data from eligible studies. All reported outcome measures and complications were analyzed descriptively.

SYNTHESIS

Five studies satisfied inclusion criteria. Included studies analyzed a total of 272 participants with a final follow-up ranging from 6 weeks to 12 months. Prolotherapy differed greatly among studies. Two studies used a multisite enthesis injection protocol while the other three used ultrasound-guided protocols. Two of the studies used an intrasubstance supraspinatus injection and three used a supraspinatus enthesis injection. Control groups consisted of nonoperative rehabilitation including physical therapy and medical management in three studies, supraspinatus saline enthesis injection in one study, and corticosteroid injection in one study. There was statistically significant improvement in pain intensity with multisite injection protocols compared to physical therapy and medical management in both studies. Ultrasound-guided supraspinatus injection trials did not find any statistically significant difference in pain intensity, range of motion, strength, function, or ultrasound characteristics compared to controls of enthesis saline injection or corticosteroid. The complication rate was low, with only 6/272 participants experiencing adverse events consisting of transient increase in pain for 1 to 2 days postintervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolotherapy with hyperosmolar dextrose solution is a potentially effective adjuvant intervention to physical therapy for patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy ranging from tendinosis to partial-thickness and small full-thickness tears. Further studies are necessary to determine effects in subpopulations as well as optimal technique including dextrose concentration, volume, and location.

In-Office Needle Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Indications and Clinical Utility

PURPOSE

This review explores the current literature regarding both the clinical indications and utility of minimally invasive in-office needle arthroscopy (IONA) relative to conventional imaging modalities.

METHODS

In compliance with R-AMSTAR (Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews) and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines, 3 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed) were searched in July 2018, in addition to the conference abstract databases of 5 prominent meetings between 2013 and 2018, for studies using IONA for diagnostic purposes. Study quality was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.

RESULTS

Among 932 conference abstracts and 369 studies identified, 11 publications involving 404 patients (395 knees and 9 shoulders) were included, with 9 clinical studies and 2 cost analyses. The median Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score was 9 for noncomparative and 23 for comparative studies. Among the 9 clinical studies, IONA had a superior sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of knee osteoarthritis, anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, and meniscal tears. IONA was comparable or inferior to MRI in the same parameters for the diagnosis of osteochondral defects and rotator cuff tears. In the 2 cost analyses, IONA had lower costs when used in place of MRI for treatment algorithms involving medial meniscal tears and rotator cuff tears but not lateral meniscal tears.

CONCLUSIONS

IONA holds potential for cost savings and improved diagnostic accuracy relative to MRI, primarily for intra-articular meniscal, ligamentous, and chondral defects of the knee. However, its current indications for use in other joints are limited to rotator cuff tears in the shoulder, making its diagnostic value in other joints much more limited. The current quality and breadth of evidence are significantly lacking, with numerous practical shortcomings. To improve acceptance of IONA, priority should be placed on establishing defined protocols, indications, contraindications, and patient perspectives for the procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level II, III, and IV studies.

Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation (ASMAR): A New, Open Access, Electronic Journal

Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation (ASMAR) is our new, open-access, electronic, companion journal to Arthroscopy and Arthroscopy Techniques. While there is already "so much to read, so little time," bearing in mind the context that some submissions are not accepted for publication in Arthroscopy despite admirable quality, the necessity of ASMAR becomes clear.

Our Measure of Medical Research Should Be Appreciable Benefit to the Patient

The clinical relevance of research is much more important than statistical significance. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are the strongest determinants of satisfaction as the result of an intervention or treatment. Outcomes can be measured in terms of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) detectable by a patient, bearing in mind that "detectable" includes worsening as well as improvement. Patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) ultimately correlate with whether patients are happy or willing to undergo an intervention again. These measures should not be reported in terms of group means, where outliers could distort the score. These measures should be reported in terms of the proportion of individual patients whose scores cross the meaningful thresholds of satisfaction.

Factors Associated With Clinically Significant Patient-Reported Outcomes After Primary Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to establish minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) after meniscectomy and factors associated with achieving these goals.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained institutional registry was retrospectively reviewed for all patients undergoing isolated arthroscopic partial meniscectomy from 2014 through 2017. MCID, SCB, and PASS were calculated for the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscores by using the anchor-based methodology and nonparametric receiver operating characteristic curves. Subscores included joint replacement (JR), physical function (PF), symptoms (Sx), pain, activities of daily living (ADL), sport, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

A total of 269 patients were analyzed in the study, which reported outcomes between 6 and 7 months after surgery. The average age of our population was 48.9 ± 12.4 years. Twenty patients reported no change, 53 reported minimal improvement, and 137 reported substantial change after surgery; whereas 59 patients reported worse outcomes. One hundred seventy-seven patients were satisfied and 92 were not satisfied with the outcome of surgery. Established MCID/SCB/PASS for the IKDC, KOOS JR, KOOS PF, KOOS Sx, KOOS Pain, KOOS ADL, and KOOS QOL were 10.6/25.3/57.9, 10.7/13.2/68.3, -8.2/-11.3/26.2, 8.9/7.1/71.4, 9.7/22.2/76.4, 11.0/16.9/89.0, 12.5/27.5/55.6, and 15.6/34.4/46.9, respectively. Higher preoperative scores were associated with reduced odds of achieving MCID and SCB but greater odds of achieving PASS for nearly all scores (P < .05). Workers' compensation status, degenerative tears, medial-sided tears, and root tears were associated with reduced odds of achieving 2 or more clinically meaningful outcomes in 2 or more scores (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically meaningful outcomes were established by patient self-assessment. Variables associated with achieving these outcomes include preoperative score (positively correlated with MCID/SCB, negatively correlated with PASS); workers' compensation; degenerative, medial-sided tears; and root tears (remaining negatively correlated with MCID/SCB/PASS). These variables should be accordingly measured for confounding in future outcome reporting.

Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review of Modern Literature

PURPOSE

To systematically review and evaluate the efficacy and complication profile of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) as a technique to address massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs).

METHODS

Searches of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and conference abstracts of 4 major conferences identified clinical studies addressing SCR for MIRCTs. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts, extracting data from eligible studies. Reported outcome measures and complications were descriptively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies, 7 full texts and 3 conference abstracts, satisfied the inclusion criteria. The included studies examined a total of 350 shoulders with a mean patient age of 60.6 years and mean follow-up period of 20.6 months postoperatively. Only 4 studies had a minimum of 24-month follow-up data. Statistically significant improvements in pain and function were noted in all studies reporting results, with mean improvement ranging from 29.4 to 68.5 and from 2.5 to 5.9 points across the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and visual analog scale score, respectively. Mean improvement in range of motion ranged from 21.7° to 64.0° in elevation and from 9.0° to 15.0° in external rotation. Statistically significant improvements in the postoperative acromiohumeral distance were noted in 4 of 5 reporting studies, with a mean increase ranging from 2.2 to 5.0 mm. The combined clinical and radiographic failure and/or retear rate ranged from 3.4% to 36.1%. Complications for all studies included deep infection (0%-2%), symptomatic suture anchor loosening (0%-4%), and severe shoulder contracture (0%-2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic SCR represents an accepted surgical option for patients with MIRCTs, with short-term improvements shown in pain, range of motion, and function. Although early results are promising, further studies are necessary to determine the long-term success of this technique and to better delineate the clinical indications, survivorship, and risk factors for failure in this population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.

Management of Concomitant Preoperative Rotator Cuff Pathology and Adhesive Capsulitis: A Systematic Review of Indications, Treatment Approaches, and Outcomes

PURPOSE

Concomitant preoperative adhesive capsulitis (AC) and rotator cuff (RC) pathology pose therapeutic challenges in light of contrasting interventional and rehabilitative goals. The purposes of this systematic review were to assess the literature regarding the management and rehabilitation of patients with concomitant RC tears and preoperative AC and to compare overall clinical outcomes between strategies for this common scenario.

METHODS

In accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, 3 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed) were searched and screened in duplicate using predetermined criteria for studies on the aforementioned patient population. Descriptive statistics are presented.

RESULTS

Of 952 studies, 17 involving 662 shoulders, with a mean age of 59.6 ± 3.5 years, 57.9% female patients, and a mean follow-up period of 18.6 months, were included. Capsular release (CR) (86.1%) and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) (33.1%) were the most common co-interventions with RC repair. Across studies, mean preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores ranged from 29.0 to 61.3, visual analog scale scores (pain) ranged from 5.3 to 8.0, and Constant scores ranged from 18.0 to 48.0. Mean postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores ranged from 76.9 to 92.0, visual analog scale scores (pain) ranged from 0.3 to 2.5, and Constant scores ranged from 72.6 to 93.2. Postoperative rehabilitation comprised abduction braces and passive range of motion immediately postoperatively for mean durations of 5.0 weeks and 5.3 weeks, respectively, followed by active range of motion at a mean of 5.3 weeks and strengthening at 10.9 weeks. Postoperative complications included stiffness, RC retear, instability, glenoid fracture, and superficial infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this systematic review support treatment of patients with degenerative RC tears and concomitant AC with a combination of RC repair and MUA, CR, or both MUA and CR. Regardless of the treatment modality, accelerated postoperative rehabilitative protocols are beneficial in preventing postoperative persistence of AC and can be safely used in this scenario without a substantial increase in complication rates compared with patients undergoing RC repair alone with conservative rehabilitation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, systematic review of Level II, III, IV, and V studies.

Healing, Pain and Function after Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Systematic Review of Treatment with Immobilization and Rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the scientific literature examining the efficacy of nonoperative management for midshaft clavicular fractures, specifically looking at the effect of immobilization and/or functional rehabilitation. TYPE: Systematic review.

LITERATURE SURVEY

MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL databases were searched.

METHODOLOGY

Inclusion criteria included adult patients enrolled in a controlled study evaluating bony healing, pain and/or function-related improvements after a strict nonoperative treatment plan for management of midshaft clavicle fractures.

SYNTHESIS

A total of 10 articles were included in the study. Only four studies contained level I evidence; four studies were prospective case series without a control, and one was a retrospective case series without a control. Half of studies used a strict immobilization period, and most utilized a period of functional rehabilitation. There were no direct comparisons between rehabilitation protocols. Studies without a strict immobilization period had a nonunion rate of 5% to 24% and residual pain in 35% to 83% of patients compared to studies with a strict immobilization period with a nonunion rate of 3% to 29% and residual pain in 14% to 49% of patients. Studies including functional rehabilitation protocol reported functional as measured by the Constant Shoulder Score of 87.8 to 96, out of a maximum of 100 representing no functional limitations, and nonunion rates of 12% to 25% compared to 81 to 85 and 3% to 29% in those without a rehabilitation protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

No studies directly examine the effect of immobilization and functional rehabilitation on clinical outcomes for midshaft clavicular fractures. Future studies are needed to better elucidate the most effective treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Reviews Pooling Heterogeneous, Low-Evidence, High-Bias Data Result in Incorrect Conclusions: But Heterogeneity is an Opportunity to Explore

Systematic Review submissions to our journal commonly pool heterogeneous studies of low levels of evidence and a high risk of bias. Pooling, or quantitative synthesis, of such study data regularly results in incorrect conclusions. We reject these submissions without peer-review (desk rejection), and typically invite authors to submit a new, subjective synthesis without pooling and to report ranges of the results of included studies rather than pooled values. Generally, quantitative synthesis, or meta-analysis, should restrict included studies to randomized controlled trials. However, systematic review with exploration of heterogeneity can result in valuable information toward determining strengths and deficiencies of current literature, and thus guide future research.

Tools to Improve Scientific Research

The mission of Arthroscopy is to provide authoritative, current, peer-reviewed clinical and basic science information regarding arthroscopic and related surgery. In addition, with a goal of improving the quality of the scientific research published in our journal and others, we develop and publish research pearls, statistical guides, article checklists and templates, and related tools. In sum, this effort allows our cadre of editors, reviewers, authors, and readers to strive to improve in our ability to create and critically analyze medical literature of the greatest merit. Our ultimate ambition is to publish more perfect articles with conclusions on which readers can rely.

Endoscopy-Assisted Hallux Valgus Correction Provides Sustainable Long-Term >10-Year Outcomes

PURPOSE

This study aims to review the long-term efficacy of the endoscopy-assisted distal soft-tissue procedure (EDSTP) and to see whether operative correction can be maintained for >10 years.

METHODS

All hallux valgus cases undergoing EDSTP from 2000 to 2006 were recruited. Preoperative, postoperative, and 10-year follow-up x-rays were analyzed. A pain score from the preoperative and >10-year follow-up was recorded. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux score and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were measured at the >10-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 85 cases met the inclusion criteria with an EDSTP performed between January 2000 and December 2006 and had a follow-up of >10 years. Hallux valgus angle corrected from 25.8° to 11.2° (P < .001), 1,2 intermetatarsal angle (1,2 IMA) improved from 13.5° to 9.5° (P < .001), and the tibial sesamoid position changed from 4 to 1 (P < .001). Pain improved from preoperative 6.5/10 to 0.5/10 (P < .001). AOFAS score was 93.5/100 at >10-year follow-up, and the FAOS was good in all 5 subcategories (range, 72.6-89.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that the EDSTP has good early postoperative results that are maintained for >10 years. It provides good long-term radiological correction, in addition to lasting pain relief and great foot function, using only 5 incisions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Editorial Commentary: Revision Hip Arthroscopy Provides Clinically Meaningful Improvements

Revision hip arthroscopy, like primary hip arthroscopy, is being performed more frequently. Questions remain regarding the clinical value of this surgical intervention, especially considering previous studies that demonstrate lower baseline patient-reported outcomes scores before and after surgery. Evaluation of the clinical utility and value of revision hip arthroscopy, and indeed all surgical interventions, need be performed using validated patient-reported outcomes in light of these clinically significant thresholds and changes, beyond just statistical differences.

Editorial Commentary: Are We Running Out of Treatments for Osteoarthritis of the Knee?

A considerable body of literature with high-level evidence has been published in the past 15 years calling into question the value of arthroscopic surgery in treating osteoarthritis of the knee (OAK). This, plus recent guidelines advising against the use of conservative treatments such as hyaluronic viscosupplementation, threatens to limit patient access to treatment for a chronic disease state with no known cure. The disease burden of OAK is considerable and represents one of the largest health care dollar expenditures in the United States and the world. Orthopaedic surgeons are the primary specialty dealing with OAK and manage this disease from inception to the final endpoint of total joint arthroplasty. As the population ages and the incidence of OAK increases, we must find ways to improve our ability to show efficacy in our treatments and also promote innovative modalities and applications to ameliorate the disability and dysfunction associated with OAK. Arthroscopy is recognized as a global leader in the presentation of evidence and debate surrounding all treatments for OAK and plays an important role in improving knowledge and treatment efficacy.

Expert Opinion Is Necessary: Delphi Panel Methodology Facilitates a Scientific Approach to Consensus

Our current trend and focus on evidence-based medicine is biased in favor of randomized controlled trials, which are ranked highest in the hierarchy of evidence while devaluing expert opinion, which is ranked lowest in the hierarchy. However, randomized controlled trials have weaknesses as well as strengths, and no research method is flawless. Moreover, stringent application of scientific research techniques, such as the Delphi Panel methodology, allows survey of experts in a high quality and scientific manner. Level V evidence (expert opinion) remains a necessary component in the armamentarium used to determine the answer to a clinical question.

Editorial Commentary: When a Tie Is Still a Win: Systematic Reviews Showing No Difference Between Treatments May Not Be Generalizable to Individual Patients

When a systematic review finds no difference between treatment options for a particular disorder, this could mean more than you think. Individual patients requiring shoulder Bankart repair are unique with respect to their demands and expectations and pathology. Surgeons should combine published principles with understanding of their own skills and their specific patient to optimize a treatment outcome.

Where Do Arthroscopy Editors Stand on Systematic Reviews of the Literature?

Systematic reviews seem overly prevalent and often inconclusive. Yet, well-performed reviews provide powerful answers to clinical questions, whereas the results of a single clinical trial may not be reliably reproducible. Thus, in balance, we rest highly in favor of rigorously performed synthetic studies that stand at the top of the evidence-based medicine hierarchy.