Shoulder Arthroscopy With Versus Without Suprascapular Nerve Release: Clinical Outcomes and Return to Sport Rate in Elite Overhead Athletes

Sports-related peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb

Peripheral nerve injuries in athletes affect the upper limb more commonly than the lower limb. Common mechanisms include compression, traction, laceration, and ischemia. Specific sports can have unique mechanisms of injury and are more likely to be associated with certain neuropathies. Familiarity with these sport-specific variables and recognition of the common presentations of upper limb neuropathic syndromes are important in assessing an athlete with a suspected peripheral nerve injury. Evaluation may require imaging modalities and/or electrodiagnostic testing to confirm a nerve injury. In some cases, diagnostic injections may be needed to differentiate neuropathic versus musculoskeletal etiology. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential for treatment/management and increases the likelihood of a safe return-to-sport and avoidance of long-term functional consequences. Most nerve injuries can be treated conservatively, however, severe or persistent cases may require surgical intervention. This monograph reviews key diagnostic, management, and preventative strategies for sports-related peripheral nerve injuries involving the upper limb.

Arm Function After Arthroscopic Decompression of the Suprascapular Nerve at the Spinoglenoid Notch and Suprascapular Notch in Volleyball Players

Background

Suprascapular nerve (SSN) entrapment in volleyball players leads to infraspinatus (ISP) muscle atrophy and weakness of abduction and external rotation (ER) of the shoulder.

Purpose

To assess functional outcome after arthroscopic extended decompression of SSN in the spinoglenoid notch and suprascapular notch in a group of volleyball athletes.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

Volleyballers who underwent arthroscopic SSN decompression were analyzed retrospectively. Assessment tools consisted of range of motion and ER strength on Lovett scale and postoperative ER strength measured by dynamometer, Constant-Murley score (CMS), and visual evaluation of ISP muscle recovery by assessing muscle bulk.

Results

The study included 10 patients (9 male and 1 female). The mean age was 25.9 years (range, 19-33) and mean follow-up was 77.9 months (range, 7-123). The mean range of postoperative ER at 90° of abduction (ER2) was 105.6° (88°-126°) and 108.5° (93°-124°) for the contralateral side, while ER2 strength was 8 ± 2.6 and 12.65 ± 2.8 kg (P < .01) respectively. Mean CMS was 89.9 (84-100). In 5 cases, there was complete recovery of ISP muscle atrophy whereas 2 patients had partial recovery and 3 had none.

Conclusion

Arthroscopic SSN decompression in volleyball players improves shoulder function, but results of ISP recovery and ER strength are variable.

Does suprascapular nerve release provide additional benefits for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is still a lack of consensus regarding whether suprascapular nerve decompression should be routinely performed with rotator cuff repair. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether additional suprascapular nerve release (SSNR) could improve shoulder functional outcomes and pain relief more than rotator cuff repair alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a literature review of electronic databases for noncomparative and comparative studies investigating the effect of SSNR in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. The primary outcome was the change in shoulder function scores from the preoperative status, and the secondary outcome was the change in the visual analog scale (VAS) score of pain after surgery. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on the study design (noncomparative studies vs. comparative studies).

RESULTS

Nine studies comprising 279 participants were included. Our analysis demonstrated that the group that underwent SSNR had a better shoulder functional score after surgery than at preoperative assessment (standardized mean difference [SMD], 1.333, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.708-1.959). No significant differences were identified in shoulder function improvement between those with and without SSNR, with an SMD of 0.163 (95% CI, -0.091 to 0.418). Likewise, the group with SSNR showed a decreased VAS score after surgery compared to their preoperative status (SMD, 0.910; 95% CI, 0.560-1.260). However, there was no significant difference in VAS change between those with and without SSNR, with an SMD of 0.431 (95% CI, -0.095 to 0.956).

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis revealed that SSNR might not be routinely needed in rotator cuff tendon repair as no additional benefits in functional improvement or pain relief were identified compared to rotator cuff tendon repair alone.

Suprascapular nerve release does not provide additional benefits in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of suprascapular nerve release in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs that compared the outcomes of patients who did and did not receive suprascapular nerve release (SSNR) during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies. Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used for cohort study assessment. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool (version 1.0) was used to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials. The primary outcomes were pain and shoulder function. The secondary outcome was the re-tear rate.

RESULTS

Two RCTs and three non-RCTs with a total of 187 patients (90 patients received SSNR and 97 patients did not receive SSNR) were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis revealed that the SSNR group did not had a more pain reduction, assessed by visual analogue scale, compared to the non-SSNR group. Also, the SSNR group did not have a significantly more improvement in the UCLA score, compared to the non-SSNR group. In addition, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of Constant score and re-tear rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The result of this study showed that additional suprascapular nerve release did not provide additional benefit in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Routine arthroscopic SSNR is not recommended when treating patients with rotator cuff tear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Bilateral suprascapular notches are asymmetrically shaped in a third of the Asian population

PURPOSE

The side-to-side differences within an individual's suprascapular notch (SSN) and the clinical characteristics of an ossified superior transverse scapular ligament are unclear. Therefore, the morphological asymmetry of the SSN was investigated, and the factors associated with the ossification of the superior transverse scapular ligament were analyzed.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-six computed tomography images were retrospectively analyzed, which included those of both scapulae of Asian patients (mean age, 62.1 ± 19.1 years; males, 197) with high-energy injuries or respiratory diseases. Variations in the SSN were classified into six types based on Rengachary's classification using reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography. The group with a type VI SSN (completely ossified superior transverse scapular ligament) in at least one scapula was compared with the other group for age, sex, and chronic comorbidities.

RESULTS

Among 276 patients, 95 (34.4%) had asymmetric SSNs and 15 (5.4%) had type VI SSNs. There were no significant differences in age, sex, or comorbidities between both the groups. However, on comparing age groups, the prevalence of type VI SSN was higher in patients aged > 70 years than in those aged < 70 years. Fifteen patients had type VI SSNs, which were unilateral in 10 patients.

CONCLUSION

Asymmetric SSNs were observed in a third of the Asian patients. There were variations in SSNs between individuals and also within an individual. In the cases with suprascapular nerve paralysis, the difference in SSN morphology compared to a healthy side should be considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Decompression of the suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular notch under combined arthroscopic and ultrasound guidance

Decompression of the suprascapular nerve (SSNe) at the suprascapular notch (SSNo) is usually performed with an arthroscopic procedure. This technique is well described but locating the nerve is complex because it is deeply buried and surrounded by soft tissue. We propose to combine ultrasound and arthroscopy (US-arthroscopy) to facilitate nerve localization, exposure and release. The main objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of this technique. This is an experimental, cadaveric study, carried out on ten shoulders. The first step of our technique is to locate the SSNo using an ultrasound scanner. Then an arthroscope is introduced under ultrasound control to the SSNo. A second portal is then created to dissect the pedicle and perform the ligament release. Ultrasound identification of the SSNo, endoscopic dissection and decompression of the nerve were achieved in 100% of cases. Ultrasound identification of the SSNo took an average of 3 min (± 4) while dissection and endoscopic release time took an average of 8 min (± 5). Ultrasound is an extremely powerful tool for non-invasive localization of nerves through soft tissues, but it is limited by the fact that tissue visualization is limited to the ultrasound slice plane, which is two-dimensional. On the other hand, arthroscopy (extra-articular) allows three-dimensional control of the surgical steps performed, but the locating of the nerve involves significant tissue detachment and a risk of damaging the nerve with the dissection. The combination of the two (US-arthroscopy) offers the possibility of combining the advantages of both techniques.

Quantitative Ultrasonographic Analysis of Changes of the Suprascapular Nerve in the Aging Population With Shoulder Pain

Background

Older people are vulnerable to painful shoulder syndromes, the majority of which are derived from degenerative rotator cuff pathologies. The suprascapular nerve (SSN) is closely related to the rotator cuff complex, and its role in shoulder pain has recently been highlighted. This study aimed to explore the differences in SSN among older people with and without shoulder pain, and to investigate the potential factors influencing the nerve size using ultrasound (US) imaging.

Methods

Participants aged ≥60 years were enrolled in the study. A systematic and bilateral US examination of the rotator cuff tendons was performed. The SSN was examined from its origin in the brachial plexus to the spinoglenoid notch of the infraspinatus fossa. The association between the nerve’s cross-sectional area (CSA) and rotator cuff lesions was analyzed using the generalized estimation equation.

Results

Among the 94 participants, 45 (with bilaterally asymptomatic shoulders) were classified into the control group, whereas 49 (with at least one-sided shoulder pain) were classified into the group with shoulder pain. The average CSAs of the SSN at the level of the brachial plexus, supraspinatus fossa, and infraspinatus fossa were comparable between the patients in the control group and those with shoulder pain. There was a higher prevalence of rotator cuff lesions and enlarged distal SSNs in the painful shoulders than in the asymptomatic shoulders of patients with unilateral involvement. A full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon was associated with swelling of the SSN in the supraspinatus fossa (β coefficient = 4.068 mm², p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In the older population, full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon are independently associated with enlargement of the distal SSN. In cases with large rotator cuff tendon tears with poor response to conservative treatments, possible SSN entrapment should be considered and managed accordingly.

Comparison of clinical outcome of decompression of suprascapular nerve at spinoglenoid notch for patients with posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears and suprascapular neuropathy

PURPOSE

In the present study, we aimed to determine whether decompression of suprascapular nerve (SSN) at the spinoglenoid notch could lead to a better functional outcome for the patients who underwent repairment of rotator cuff due to posterosupeior massive rotator cuff tear (MRCT) and suprascapular neuropathy.

METHODS

A total of 20 patients with posterosuperior MRCT and suprascapular neuropathy were analyzed in the present work. The preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed rotator cuff tear in supraspinatus and infraspinatus. All patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Patients were divided into two groups (group A: non-releasing, group B: releasing) according to whether the SSN at the spinoglenoid notch was decompressed. The modified University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale (UCLA) and visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaire were adopted to assess the function of the affected shoulder preoperatively and 12 months after the operation. Electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction study (NCS) were used to evaluate the nerve condition. Patients underwent MRI and EMG/NCS at 6 months after operation and last follow-up.

RESULTS

All patients were satisfied with the treatment. MRI showed that it was well-healed in 19 patients at 6 months after the operation. However, the fatty infiltration of supraspinatus and infraspinatus was not reversed. Only one patient in the non-releasing group showed the retear. The retear rate of group A and group B were 30% (3/10) and 20% (2/10) respectively at 12 months after the operation. One patient undergoing SSN decompression complained of discomfort in the infraspinatus area. His follow-up EMG after 6 months showed fibrillation potentials (1+) and positive sharp waves (1+) in the infraspinatus. The other patients' EMG results showed no abnormality. The postoperative UCLA and VAS scores were improved in both groups, and there was no significant difference in the follow-up outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with postersuperior MRCT and suprascapular neuropathy, decompression of suprascapular nerve at spinoglenoid notch didn't lead to a better functional outcome with the repairment of rotator cuff. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair could reverse the suprascapular neuropathy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Suprascapular Nerve Decompression for Suprascapular Neuropathy

PURPOSE

To report clinical outcomes following arthroscopic suprascapular nerve (SSN) decompression for suprascapular neuropathy at the suprascapular and/or spinoglenoid notch in the absence of major concomitant pathology.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data of 19 patients who underwent SSN release at the suprascapular and/or spinoglenoid notch between April 2006 and August 2017 with ≥2 years of follow-up. Patients who underwent concomitant rotator cuff or labral repairs or had severe osteoarthritis were excluded. Pre- and postoperative strength and patient-reported outcomes were collected, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), 12-item Short Form (SF-12), and satisfaction. Complications and revisions were recorded.

RESULTS

At a mean final follow-up of 4.8 years, pre- to postoperative ASES (64.9 ± 18.7 versus 83.5 ± 23.1; P = .018), QuickDASH (28.7 ± 17.2 versus 12.7 ± 17.1; P = .028), SANE (64.3 ± 16.4 versus 80.8 ± 22.3; P = .034), and SF-12 PCS (41.1 ± 10.8 versus 52.3 ± 5.8; P = .007) scores all significantly improved. Median strength for external rotation improved significantly (4 [range 2 to 5] versus 5 [range 3 to 5]; P = .014). There was no statistically significant improvement in median strength for abduction (4 [range 3 to 5] versus 5 [5]; P = .059). Median postoperative satisfaction was 9 (range 1 to 10), with 8 patients (50%) rating satisfaction ≥9. No complications were observed, and no patients went on to revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic SSN decompression for suprascapular neuropathy at the suprascapular and/or spinoglenoid notch in the absence of major concomitant glenohumeral pathology results in good functional outcomes with significant improvements from before to after surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, therapeutic case series.

Suprascapular Nerve Release: Technique Based on Anatomic Landmarks

Dysfunction of the suprascapular nerve (SSN) is closely related to rotator cuff pathology; nerve dysfunction can lead to cuff disease and vice versa. Owing to repetitive microtrauma during overhead sports or massive cuff tears with significant tendon retraction, the SSN may suffer compression or traction neuropathy at the suprascapular notch. The SSN release technique has already been described. However, on the basis of the many hands-on cadaveric laboratories in which we have participated in the past 20 years, only a few instructors and almost none of the attendants have shown the experience and skill set needed to release the SSN at the suprascapular notch. Therefore, a review of the surgical technique following the anatomic descriptions of an expert anatomist (P.G.) of the shoulder girdle is quite valuable.

Arthroscopic release of proximal supra-scapular nerve entrapment: Medium-term results

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and electrophysiological results in the medium term of the arthroscopic release of the proximal entrapment of the suprascapular nerve.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

It is a retrospective study that includes 75 patients with idiopathic entrapment of the suprascapular nerve in the suprascapular notch in whom conservative treatment has failed. All patients underwent electrophysiological tests (EMG) as well as clinical test (Constant and DASH test) preoperatively and during follow-up.

RESULTS

75 patients (53 women and 22 men) with a mean age of 44.1 ± 10.7 years met study criteria with a mean follow-up of 63.7 ± 29.1 months. Preoperatively the DASH value was 78,6 ± 10,2, the Constant test value was 37.1 ±8.8 and the EVA value was 8.8 ± 1.1 while the values in the last revision were 19.4 ± 15.8 for DASH, 80.2 ± 9.6 (for the CS and 2 ±1.3 for the EVA scale; the differences were significant in all cases (P<.001). Regarding the results of the electrophysiological test, preoperatively there were 21 very severe grades (28%), 32 severe (42.6%), 17 moderate (22.6%) and 5 mild (6.6%). While in the last review there were 3 severe degrees (4%), 6 moderate (8%), 40 mild (53.3%) and 26 normal (34.6%). There was no very severe grade (0%); 3 patients (4%) had to be reoperated due to persistent symptons.

CONCLUSIONS

The arthroscopic release of idiopathic entrapment of the suprascapular nerve in the superior scapular notch achieved good clinical and electrophysiological results in the medium term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

iv; case series; treatment study.

Suprascapular nerve decompression in addition to rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized observational trial

BACKGROUND

Tear and retraction of the supraspinatus (SS) and infraspinatus (IS) musculotendinous units and/or their repair may be associated with traction damage to the suprascapular nerve, potentially responsible for pain or weakness of the rotator cuff (RC). Arthroscopic release of the transverse scapular ligament at the suprascapular notch has been advocated to prevent or treat suprascapular nerve impairment associated with RC retraction and/or repair. The effect of this procedure on preoperative normal nerve function is, however, not well studied.We hypothesize that (1) decompression of the suprascapular nerve without preoperative pathologic neurophysiological findings will not improve clinical or imaging outcome and (2) suprascapular decompression will not measurably change suprascapular nerve function.

METHODS

Nineteen consecutive patients with a magnetic resonance arthrography documented RC tear involving SS and IS but normal preoperative electromyography (EMG)/nerve conduction studies of the SS and IS were enrolled in a prospective, controlled trial involving RC repair with or without suprascapular nerve decompression at the suprascapular notch. Nine patients were randomized to undergo, and 10 not to undergo, a decompression of the suprascapular nerve. Patients were assessed clinically (Constant score, mobility, pain, strength, subjective shoulder value), with magnetic resonance imaging and neurophysiology preoperatively and at 3- and 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

There was no clinically relevant difference between the release and the non-release group in any clinical parameter at any time point. At magnetic resonance imaging, there was a slightly greater increase of fatty infiltration of the IS in the release group without any other differences between the 2 groups. Electromyographically, there were no pathologic findings in the non-release group at any time point. Conversely, 3 of the 9 patients of the release group showed pathologic EMG findings at 3 months, of whom 2 had recovered fully and 1 only partially at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

In the presence of normal EMG findings, suprascapular nerve release added to arthroscopic RC repair is not associated with any clinical benefit, but with electromyographically documented, postoperative impairment of nerve function in 1 of 3 cases. Suprascapular nerve release does not therefore seem to be justified as an adjunct to RC repair if preoperative EMG findings document normal suprascapular nerve function. Based on these findings, the ongoing prospective randomized trial was terminated.

The Evaluation and Management of Suprascapular Neuropathy

Suprascapular neuropathy is a potential source of shoulder pain and functional limitation that can present secondary to various etiologies including entrapment or compression. Cystic lesions arising from a labral or capsular tear can compress the nerve along its course over the scapula. Nerve traction is theorized to arise from chronic overhead athletics or due to a retracted rotator cuff tear. The diagnosis of suprascapular neuropathy is based on a combination of a detailed history, a comprehensive physical examination, imaging, and electrodiagnostic studies. Although the anatomic course and variations in bony constraint are well understood, the role of surgical treatment in cases of suprascapular neuropathy is less clear. Recent reviews on the topic have shed light on the outcomes after the treatment of suprascapular neuropathy because of compression, showing that surgical release can improve return to play in well-indicated patients. The incidence of compressive neuropathy is quite high in the overhead athletic cohort, but most patients do not show clinically relevant deficiencies in function. Surgical release is therefore not routinely recommended unless patients with pain or deficits in strength fail appropriate nonsurgical treatment.

Motor Recovery of the Suprascapular Nerve after Arthroscopic Decompression in the Scapular Notch - a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The suprascapular nerve can be compromised as a result of a compression syndrome in different locations. A (proximal) compression within the scapular notch can lead to dorsal shoulder pain and simultaneous weakness of the infraspinatus and supraspinatus muscles. By transection of the lig. transversum this compression syndrome can be treated. By means of a systematic review, the present work analyzes the motor recovery potential after arthroscopic decompression.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review of the U. S. National Library of Medicine/National Institutes of Health (PubMed) database and the Cochrane Library was performed using the PRISMA checklist. The search words used were "suprascapular" and "arthroscopic"; "suprascapular" and "arthroscopy". Based on the evaluated literature, articles in English with at least a partial arthroscopic case series from 4 cases on and a compression syndrome of the suprascapular nerve treated with arthroscopic decompression in the scapular notch were identified. Motor recovery was described by means of EMG, clinical strength and MRI.

RESULTS

Primarily 408 hits were generated. Six articles met the inclusion criteria and were further analyzed. The number of arthroscopic cases was between 4 and a maximum of 27. The level of evidence was between III and IV. The majority of the reported clinical results were good. Motor recovery as measured by EMG was observed, recovery of full strength was not achieved in the majority of reported cases (60%), neither was regression of structural (fatty) degeneration of the muscle bellies.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic decompression of the suprascapular nerve in the scapular notch provides good clinical results and considerable pain relief. However, in the majority of cases it does not lead to a complete recovery of the strength of the supra- and infraspinatus muscles. Patients should be informed about this. An early decompression after diagnosis in the event of proximal compression within the suprascapular notch combined with beginning EMG or MRI changes appears reasonable. These beginning changes should be further defined. Future studies should develop prognostic criteria for motor recovery. Awareness regarding the diagnosis needs to be improved due to the probably time-dependent irreversibility of resulting muscular weakness.

Editorial Commentary: Suprascapular Neuropathy in Overhead Athletes: To Release or Not to Release?

A growing body of evidence has demonstrated that repetitive overhead athletes with shoulder pathology often have associated infraspinatus atrophy and suprascapular neuropathy. Although decompression of the suprascapular nerve has not been shown to clearly impact outcomes in the general population, release of the nerve in overhead athletes with documented evidence of impingement may improve outcomes in this high-demand population.