Tachibana Y, Mae T, Shino K, Matsuo T, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H, Nakata K. Sequential analysis of three-dimensional tibiofemoral relationship through anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with gravity-assisted radiographic technique in prone position.
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE ARTHROSCOPY REHABILITATION AND TECHNOLOGY 2019;
18:11-17. [PMID:
31641617 PMCID:
PMC6796590 DOI:
10.1016/j.asmart.2019.08.001]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background/objectives
It is important to restore the tibiofemoral relationship as well as the anterior knee laxity for more successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, since a residual abnormality in the tibiofemoral relationship would lead an abnormal stress on the articular cartilages/menisci and consequently increase the risk of osteoarthritis in the future. This study aimed to sequentially clarify the three-dimensional tibiofemoral relationship before and after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction under an anterior tibial load with a gravity-assisted radiographic technique in the prone position.
Methods
Fifteen patients with unilateral ACL injury participated in the study. Anatomic triple-bundle ACL reconstruction was performed using semitendinosus tendon autografts. During the computed tomography scans that were performed preoperatively, and those performed at 3 weeks and at 6 months postoperatively, the patients lay in the prone position with the knee flexed at 15°, wherein the calf weight could exert an anterior drawer force on the tibia due to gravity. Three-dimensional the tibial position relative to the femur were evaluated for each time point, followed by calculation of side-to-side differences in the parameters between the ACL-deficient/ACL-reconstructed knees and the contralateral intact knees. Seven healthy volunteers were enrolled in the control group and the side-to-side differences (right minus left) in these parameters were calculated.
Results
The tibia in the ACL-deficient knee was located anteriorly by 3.5 ± 1.1 mm and rotated internally by 2.4° ± 2.3°; these values were significantly larger than the corresponding values of −0.2 ± 1.5 mm and 0.1° ± 2.2° in the control group. However, at 3 weeks postoperatively, the tibia in the ACL-reconstructed knee was over-constrained as compared to that in the control group; it was located posteriorly by 2.5 ± 1.4 mm and rotated externally by 3.4° ± 3.4°. At 6 months postoperatively, no significant difference was observed in the tibial displacements/rotations between the patient and control groups. The side-to-side difference in the anterior knee laxity at the manual maximum anterior load was 0.1 ± 1.2 mm at 6 months postoperatively, with a significant improvement over the preoperative value of 7.4 ± 2.5 mm.
Conclusions
Anatomic ACL reconstruction could restore not only the normal anterior knee laxity, but also the normal tibiofemoral relationship even under an anterior tibial load.
Tibiofemoral relationship was analyzed before and after anatomic ACL reconstruction.
Tibial anterior shift and internal rotation was observed in ACL-injuried knees.
Anatomic ACL reconstruction could restore the normal tibiofemoral relationship.
Collapse