1
|
Jones EN, Post HK, Stovall BA, Ierulli VK, Vopat BG, Mulcahey MK. Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Augmentation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Most Commonly Indicated for Pivot Shift of Grade 2 or Greater and for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2024; 40:2624-2632. [PMID: 38331370 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the most common indications for lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 2000 to the present (June 2022). Studies that met the following criteria were included: patients of any age who underwent LET in addition to ACLR, studies reporting at least 1 indication for LET, and observational/randomized controlled trial study designs including prevalence of indications. Publications had to be reported in English and peer reviewed and to have originated in the United States or countries offering identical protocols and procedures. RESULTS A total of 463 studies were identified from the initial search, 23 of which met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Eight of the 23 studies (34.8%) used a modified Lemaire technique, seven (30.4%) used a MacIntosh modified by Arnold-Coker, and eight (34.8%) used other techniques to perform LET. A total of 2,125 patients (53% female, 47% male [3 studies did not report sex]) underwent ACLR augmented with LET. The indications along with prevalence were as follows: positive pivot shift test (grade ≥2) (19 of 23, 82.6%), revision ACLR (12 of 23, 52.2%), ligamentous laxity (11 of 23, 47.8%), general sports participation (11 of 23, 47.8%), age less than 25 years (8 of 23, 34.8%), high risk of graft failure (5 of 23, 21.7%), and positive Lachman test (4 of 23, 17.4%). CONCLUSIONS Pivot shift grade ≥2 was the most common reason orthopaedic surgeons chose to add LET to ACLR, with revision ACLR, patient age <25, and general sports participation following closely behind. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily N Jones
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A
| | - Hunter K Post
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Bailey A Stovall
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A
| | - Victoria K Ierulli
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A
| | - Bryan G Vopat
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Mary K Mulcahey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abou Al Ezz M, Gerometta A, Valentin E, Meyer A, Grimaud O, Lefevre N, Bohu Y, Hardy A. Comparison of Revision ACL Reconstruction Using Iliotibial Band Augmented With Allograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11:23259671231214803. [PMID: 38107845 PMCID: PMC10722940 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231214803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is one of the conventional techniques in the revision setting especially after a primary hamstring tendon graft. The use of the iliotibial band (ITB) augmented with allograft (AG) is an encouraging graft alternative for ACLR in terms of clinical and biomechanical data in the literature. Purpose To compare the clinical outcomes of BTB graft with lateral extra-articular tenodesis, modified Lemaire (BTB-LET), and an ITB graft augmented with hamstring AG (ITB-AG) in the setting of revision ACLR. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods Descriptive data and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected from patients who underwent revision ACLR with either the BTB-LET or ITB-AG technique between 2012 and 2020 and who had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The clinical outcomes were assessed by the Lysholm, Tegner, Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation form, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Return to sports, complications, and revisions were also analyzed. Results A total of 167 patients were included, with 106 patients in the BTB-LET group and 61 patients in the ITB-AG group. There were no significant group differences in sociodemographic characteristics; however, the mean follow-up was significantly longer in the BTB-LET compared with the ITB-AG group (52.0 vs 38.8 months, respectively; P = .0001). There were no significant differences in postoperative outcome scores; however, patients in the ITB-AG group had a higher rate of return to competitive pivoting sports (32.8% vs 17.9%; P = .0288) and a higher overall rate of return to preinjury sport (63.9% vs 47.2%; P = .0365). Complications, including revisions for meniscal or chondral lesions and retears (8 [8.3%] in the BTB-LET group and 2 [4.0%] in the ITB-AG group), were not significantly different. All retears were due to sports-related accidents. Conclusion In this study, ITB-AG was not different from BTB-LET in terms of functional outcomes scores but allowed better return to sport rate. Performing ITB-AG reconstruction in the setting of revision ACLR appears to be safe, effective, and associated with a satisfying return-to-sports rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Alain Meyer
- Clinique du Sport, Ramsay Santé, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Yohan Bohu
- Clinique du Sport, Ramsay Santé, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aldag L, Dallman J, Henkelman E, Herda A, Randall J, Tarakemeh A, Morey T, Vopat BG. Various Definitions of Failure Are Used in Studies of Patients Who Underwent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2023; 5:100801. [PMID: 37766857 PMCID: PMC10520319 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To conduct a literature review to assess the definitions of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure used throughout the orthopaedic literature. Methods A systematic search of Embase, Ovid Medline, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science was conducted by a university librarian to identity level I-IV clinical studies on ACLR failure. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients who underwent ACLR and included a definition of failure of ACLR. Patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repairs, animal/cadaver studies, review studies, non-English language articles, and non-full text articles were excluded. Failure data were extracted from each study and categorized. Other data that were extracted included follow-up time after ACLR, failure reoperation rate, and failure reoperation procedure. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data. Results Out of 2,775 studies, 104 (3.75%) met inclusion criteria and were analyzed in this review. The most common definition of ACLR failure included the use of a physical examination, specifically Lachman's test (21/104 [20.2%]), anterior laxity assessment, or a Pivot-Shift test (24/104 [35.2%]) or undergoing or requiring revision ACLR (39/104 [37.5%]). Although some studies used quantitative tests or imaging to help define "failure," others simply defined it as graft rerupture that was otherwise not defined (22/104 [22.5%]). Other common definitions included: the use of imaging (magnetic resonance imaging/radiographs) to confirm graft re-rupture (37/104 [35.6%]), patient-reported outcomes (recurrent instability)/patient reported outcomes measures (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Tegner) (18/104 [17.3%]), and the use of an arthrometer (KT-1000/2000, Rollimeter, or Kneelax) (17/104 [16.3%]). The least common definitions included graft failure or rerupture confirmed by arthroscopy (13/104 [12.5%]) and nonrevision surgery (2/104 [1.0%]). The failure rate of this procedure ranged from 0% to 100% depending on the definition of "failure." Conclusion In this study, we found that a variety of definitions of failure are used among studies published in the orthopaedic literature. The most common criteria for failure of ACLR were the results of physical examination tests (35%), the need for undergoing a revision ACLR (36%), and the use of imaging to diagnose the failure (34%). About 17% of studies included in this review used patient-reported outcomes, specifically recurrent instability, or PROMs (IKDC, KOOS, Tegner) in their assessment of failure of ACLR. The least used definitions of "failure" of ACLR included nonrevision ACLR surgery (2%). Although some studies used similar tests or categories in their definition of failure, there were a variety of score and grade cutoff points between them. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Levi Aldag
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, the University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Johnathan Dallman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, the University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Erik Henkelman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, the University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Ashley Herda
- Department of Health, Sport, and Exercise Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Jeffrey Randall
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, the University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Armin Tarakemeh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, the University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Tucker Morey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, the University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Bryan G. Vopat
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, the University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sørensen OG, Faunø P, Konradsen L, Nielsen T, Schaarup S, Mygind-Klavsen B, Krogsgaard M, Lind M. Combined anterior cruciate ligament revision with reconstruction of the antero-lateral ligament does not improve outcome at 2-year follow-up compared to isolated acl revision; a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023; 31:5077-5086. [PMID: 37733288 PMCID: PMC10598101 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07558-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is essential to obtain rotational stability of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) and it is suggested that a supplementary reconstruction of the antero-lateral ligament (ALL-R) may supports this. Theoretically, ALL-R may be particularly advantageous to support revision of failed ACL-Rs. It was hypothesized that ACL revision combined with ALL-R will result in superior outcome compared to isolated ACL revision. METHODS The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. Patients eligible for first time ACL revision were randomized to either isolated ACL revision (- ALL group) or ACL revision combined with a single-stranded allograft ALL-reconstruction (+ ALL group). Patient reported outcomes and function were evaluated at two-year follow-up by KNEES-ACL, KOOS, and Tegner activity scale. Objective knee laxity was evaluated at one-year follow-up using an instrumented Rolimeter test, the pivot shift test, and a manual Lachman test. RESULTS A total of 103 patients were enrolled with 49 patients randomized to the + ALL group and 54 patients in the - ALL group. There were no differences at baseline between groups regarding age, gender, body mass index, preoperative patient reported outcome scores and concomitant meniscus or cartilage injury. The ACL revision was performed with an allograft in 10 patients (20%) in the + ALL group and 8 patients (15%) in the -ALL group. At follow-up there was no significant difference between the groups in patient reported outcome scores and clinical knee laxity. CONCLUSION Supplementary ALL-R does not improve subjective outcome of first time ACL revision at two-years and clinical knee stability at one-year follow-up compared to isolated ACL revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ole Gade Sørensen
- Department of Sports Traumatology, University Hospital of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Peter Faunø
- Department of Sports Traumatology, University Hospital of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars Konradsen
- Section for Sports Traumatology, Bispebjerg, Frederiksberg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Torsten Nielsen
- Department of Sports Traumatology, University Hospital of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Susanne Schaarup
- Section for Sports Traumatology, Bispebjerg, Frederiksberg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Michael Krogsgaard
- Section for Sports Traumatology, Bispebjerg, Frederiksberg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Lind
- Department of Sports Traumatology, University Hospital of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Borim FM, Jubert NJ, Vinaixa MMR, Portas-Torres I, Bueno JP, Mayayo RS, Peiró JVA, Feliu EC, Monyart JM. Good rates of return-to-sport in athletes after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous patellar tendon and lateral extra-articular tenodesis: a 2-year follow-up prospective study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & TRAUMATOLOGY : ORTHOPEDIE TRAUMATOLOGIE 2023; 33:3125-3133. [PMID: 37039899 PMCID: PMC10504162 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03544-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most athletes who undergo revision of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) aim to return to their preinjury sport at a similar level of performance while minimizing the risk for reinjury. Additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has recently been correlated with improved outcomes and low complication rate. Yet, there are few series evaluating return-to-sport (RTS) and clinical outcomes after revision ACLR using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and LET in athletes. METHODS The study cohort consisted of 19 eligible athletes who had undergone their first revision ACLR using BPTB and LET (modified Lemaire) between January 2019 and 2020. Patients were prospectively followed and interviewed in a sports activity survey during a 2-year follow-up. RESULTS Despite all patients returning to sports after revision ACLR surgery, 52.6% resumed playing at their preinjury level. Furthermore, patient-reported functional outcomes improved significantly following revision surgery, as evidenced by improvements in IKDC [64.4 (± 12) to 87.8 (± 6)], Lysholm [71.27 (± 12) to 84.2 (± 9.7)], and SF-12 scales [Physical: 53.3 (± 3) 57 (± 1.2); Mental: 50.2 (± 3.3) to 52.7 (± 2.4)]. One case (5.3%) experienced persistent pain and underwent reoperation for a partial meniscectomy. CONCLUSION After revision ACLR using autologous BPTB and LET, all active individuals are expected to RTS, similar to primary ACLR. The difference comes down to returning to the preinjury level, where the levels are lower depending on the sport and initial level of play. Good mid-term functional outcomes with a low complication rate can be expected in most cases. STUDY DESIGN Case series; Level of evidence IV. ETHICAL COMMITTEE APPROVAL NUMBER PR(ATR)79/2021 and HCB/2023/0173.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe Moreira Borim
- Surgery and Morphological Sciences, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
- Orthopaedic Surgery Department; Knee Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
- Bioengineering, Cell Therapy and Surgery in Congenital Malformations - VHIR, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Nayana Joshi Jubert
- Surgery and Morphological Sciences, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
- Orthopaedic Surgery Department; Knee Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Reconstructive Surgery of Locomotor System Group - VHIR, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Mercedes Revertè Vinaixa
- Surgery and Morphological Sciences, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
- Orthopaedic Surgery Department; Knee Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Reconstructive Surgery of Locomotor System Group - VHIR, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Knee Surgery Unit, Clínica Corachan, Carrer de Buïgas, 19, 08017, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Irene Portas-Torres
- Orthopaedic Surgery Department; Knee Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Pijoan Bueno
- Surgery and Morphological Sciences, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
- Orthopaedic Surgery Department; Knee Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Reconstructive Surgery of Locomotor System Group - VHIR, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Knee Surgery Unit, Clínica Corachan, Carrer de Buïgas, 19, 08017, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Raquel Sevil Mayayo
- Orthopaedic Surgery Department; Knee Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Knee Surgery Unit, Clínica Corachan, Carrer de Buïgas, 19, 08017, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Vicente Andrés Peiró
- Surgery and Morphological Sciences, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
- Reconstructive Surgery of Locomotor System Group - VHIR, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Knee Surgery Unit, Clínica Corachan, Carrer de Buïgas, 19, 08017, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enric Castellet Feliu
- Surgery and Morphological Sciences, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
- Orthopaedic Surgery Department; Knee Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Reconstructive Surgery of Locomotor System Group - VHIR, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Minguell Monyart
- Surgery and Morphological Sciences, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
- Orthopaedic Surgery Department; Knee Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
- Reconstructive Surgery of Locomotor System Group - VHIR, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
- Knee Surgery Unit, Clínica Corachan, Carrer de Buïgas, 19, 08017, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zanna L, Niccolò G, Matteo I, Malone J, Roberto C, Fabrizio M. Clinical outcomes and return to sport after single-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by bone-patellar tendon autograft combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & TRAUMATOLOGY : ORTHOPEDIE TRAUMATOLOGIE 2023; 33:1811-1819. [PMID: 35980541 PMCID: PMC10276068 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03352-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure rate continues to increase. Involvement of a young population with a desire to return to sport, explains the increased need for ACLR (revACLR) revision. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome, complications, failure rate and return to sport of a single-stage revACLR using bone patellar tendon-bone (BTBT) combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on 36 patients who underwent revACLR. Knee stability was assessed by Lachman and Pivot shift test. Objective anterior laxity was determined by KT-2000 arthrometer. The IKDC subjective, Lysholm, ACL-RSI Scores, level of sport activity and Forgotten Joint Score-12 were recorded. RESULTS Of 36 patients, we collected data from 17 who underwent single-stage revACLR with autologous BTBT combined with LET, performed using an extra-articular MacIntosh procedure as modified by Arnold-Coker. The side-to-side difference in Lachman test and Pivot shift test significantly improved postoperatively. The subjective IKDC, Lysholm and ACL-RSI significantly improved from 71.4 ± 9.03 to 92 ± 6.9, from 58.3 ± 19.3 to 66.8 ± 27.7 and from 50.4 ± 12.2 to 68.6 ± 24.5, respectively during the post-operative follow-up. Ten patients (58.8%) returned to their desired level of sport. One patient was considered a failure because of the postoperative laxity. CONCLUSION Single-stage revACLR with BPTB combined with LET is a safe procedure that shows good objective and subjective outcomes, and a high rate of return to the same level of sport. Reducing rotational instability and strain on intra-articular reconstructed structures results in a low rate of complications and failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Zanna
- University of Florence, Orthopaedic Clinic CTO, Largo Palagi 1, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Giabbani Niccolò
- University of Florence, Orthopaedic Clinic CTO, Largo Palagi 1, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Innocenti Matteo
- University of Florence, Orthopaedic Clinic CTO, Largo Palagi 1, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Joseph Malone
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Medical Clinic, Ullevål Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Civinini Roberto
- University of Florence, Orthopaedic Clinic CTO, Largo Palagi 1, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Matassi Fabrizio
- University of Florence, Orthopaedic Clinic CTO, Largo Palagi 1, 50139 Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li X, Yan L, Li D, Fan Z, Liu H, Wang G, Jiu J, Yang Z, Li JJ, Wang B. Failure modes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2023; 47:719-734. [PMID: 36642768 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-05687-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The reason for graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is multifactorial. Controversies remain regarding the predominant factor and incidence of failure aetiology in the literature. This review aimed to provide a meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the relative proportion of various failure modes among patients with ACLR failure. METHODS The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases were searched for literature on ACLR failure or revision from 1975 to 2021. Data related to causes for ACLR surgical failure were extracted, and a random effects model was used to pool the results, which incorporates potential heterogeneity. Failure modes were compared between different populations, research methods, graft types, femoral portal techniques, and fixation methods by subgroup analysis or linear regression. Funnel plots were used to identify publication bias and small-study effects. RESULTS A total of 39 studies were analyzed, including 33 cohort studies and six registry-based studies reporting 6578 failures. The results showed that among patients with ACLR failure or revision, traumatic reinjury was the most common failure mode with a rate of 40% (95% CI: 35-44%), followed by technical error (34%, 95% CI: 28-42%) and biological failure (11%, 95% CI: 7-15%). Femoral tunnel malposition was the most common cause of the technical error (29%, 95% CI: 18-41%), with more than two times higher occurrence than tibial tunnel malposition (11%, 95% CI: 6-16%). Traumatic reinjury was the most common factor for ACLR failure in European populations and in recent studies, while technical errors were more common in Asian populations, earlier studies, and surgery performed using the transtibial (TT) portal technique. Biological factors were more likely to result in ACLR failure in hamstring (HT) autografts compared to bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts. CONCLUSION Trauma is the most important factor leading to surgical failure or revision following ACLR. Technical error is also an important contributing factor, with femoral tunnel malposition being the leading cause of error resulting in failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoke Li
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanxi Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Taiyuan, China
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lei Yan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanxi Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Dijun Li
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanxi Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Zijuan Fan
- Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Haifeng Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanxi Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Guishan Wang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Jingwei Jiu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanxi Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Ziquan Yang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanxi Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
| | - Jiao Jiao Li
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
| | - Bin Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanxi Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Helito CP, Sobrado MF, Moreira da Silva AG, Castro de Pádua VB, Guimarães TM, Bonadio MB, Pécora JR, Gobbi RG, Camanho GL. The Addition of Either an Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction or an Iliotibial Band Tenodesis Is Associated With a Lower Failure Rate After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Comparative Trial. Arthroscopy 2023; 39:308-319. [PMID: 35840071 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.06.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the failure rate in patients who underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction alone or associated with an extra-articular procedure. Secondary objectives were to compare ACL laxity, patient-reported outcome measures, and complication rates in these patients and, subsequently, to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction associated with anatomical anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction or lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). METHODS This was a retrospective comparative study. Patients were classified into 2 groups, according to whether (group 2) or not (group 1) an extra-articular reconstruction was performed. Patients who underwent an extra-articular procedure were further divided into ALL reconstruction (group 2A) and LET (group 2B). Baseline demographic variables, operative data and postoperative data were evaluated. RESULTS The groups with (86 patients) and without (88 patients) an associated extra-articular reconstruction had similar preoperative data. Group 2 had a lower failure rate (4.6% vs 14.7%; P = .038), better KT-1000, better pivot-shift, and better Lysholm. There was no difference regarding complications, except more lateral pain in group 2. Regarding the groups who underwent ALL reconstruction (41 patients) and LET (46 patients), group 2A showed better Lysholm scores. Both groups had similar failure rates and complications. CONCLUSIONS Patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction with a laterally based augmentation procedure had a lower failure rate than patients who underwent isolated revision ACL reconstruction. KT-1000 and pivot-shift examination were also significantly better when a lateral augmentation was performed. Complications were similar except for an increase in lateral pain in the augmented group. No clinically important differences were found when comparing the LET group to the ALL group other than a statistical improvement in the Lysholm functional scale, likely not clinically meaningful, favoring the ALL group and an increased duration of post-operative lateral pain in the LET group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilo Partezani Helito
- Grupo de Joelho, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo - SP; Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo - SP
| | - Marcel Faraco Sobrado
- Grupo de Joelho, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo - SP; Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo - SP
| | - Andre Giardino Moreira da Silva
- Grupo de Joelho, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo - SP.
| | | | - Tales Mollica Guimarães
- Grupo de Joelho, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo - SP
| | - Marcelo Batista Bonadio
- Grupo de Joelho, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo - SP
| | - José Ricardo Pécora
- Grupo de Joelho, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo - SP
| | - Riccardo Gomes Gobbi
- Grupo de Joelho, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo - SP
| | - Gilberto Luis Camanho
- Grupo de Joelho, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo - SP
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Marshall DC, Silva FD, Goldenberg BT, Quintero D, Baraga MG, Jose J. Imaging Findings of Complications After Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis of the Knee: A Current Concepts Review. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10:23259671221114820. [PMID: 36062159 PMCID: PMC9434692 DOI: 10.1177/23259671221114820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, many patients continue to experience persistent anterolateral rotatory instability. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is used to address this instability by harvesting a portion of the iliotibial band, passing it underneath the fibular collateral ligament, and attaching it just proximal and posterior to the lateral femoral epicondyle. Based on the most recent clinical evidence, the addition of LET to ACL reconstruction improves clinical outcomes, which has led to an increase in the use of this technique. Purpose To provide an overview of the postoperative complications of the LET procedure and their associated imaging findings, with a focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study Design Narrative review. Methods In this scoping review, the authors reviewed available radiographic, computed tomography, and MRI scans of patients who experienced postoperative complications after ACL reconstruction with LET, in which the complication was determined to be from the LET procedure. Images were reviewed and subsequently described by an on-staff musculoskeletal radiologist. Results The authors found 9 different complications associated with LET: graft failure, hematoma, infection, chronic pain, tunnel convergence, fixation device migration, muscular hernia, peroneal nerve palsy, and knee stiffness. They supplemented these findings with radiographic evidence from 6 patients. Conclusion As extra-articular reconstruction techniques including LET become more popular among orthopaedic surgeons, it is important that radiologists and surgeons be adept at recognizing the normal imaging findings of LET and associated complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle C. Marshall
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial
Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Flavio D. Silva
- Department of Radiology, Grupo Osteomuscular, Fleury Medicine e
Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Brandon T. Goldenberg
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial
Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Daniel Quintero
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial
Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial
Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael G. Baraga
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial
Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jean Jose
- Department of Radiology, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial
Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cohen D, Yao PF, Uddandam A, de SA D, Arakgi ME. Etiology of Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Scoping Review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2022; 15:394-401. [DOI: 10.1007/s12178-022-09776-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
11
|
Marx JS, Plantz MA, Gerlach EB, Carney J, Swiatek PR, Cantrell CK, Tjong VK. Revision ACL reconstruction has higher incidence of 30-day hospital readmission, reoperation, and surgical complications relative to primary procedures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30:1605-1610. [PMID: 34279703 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06646-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although there has been substantial improvement in ACL reconstructive surgery, graft failure remains a devastating complication for some patients. Revision procedures are inherently more complex and technically challenging. The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of short-term complications after these procedures and to compare trends in operative length, relative valuation, and reimbursement after primary versus revision ACL reconstruction. METHODS Primary and revision arthroscopic ACL reconstruction cases were identified on the American College of Surgeons' NSQIP database using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017. Demographics, patient variables, and surgical variables were compared between primary and revision groups using Chi-squared tests. Logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for revision ACL reconstruction. Various 30-day outcome measures were compared between the primary and revision ACL reconstruction groups. Various measures of valuation-including total relative value units (RVU) and reimbursement per minute-were calculated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS A total of 8292 patients-8135 primary and 157 revision procedures-were included in the final cohort. Higher ASA scores were associated with revision ACL reconstructions. Patients undergoing revision procedures were less likely to have an ASA score of 1 (p < 0.001) and more likely to have an ASA score of 2 (p = 0.004) or 3 (p = 0.020). Revision ACL reconstruction was associated with higher rates of poor 30-day outcome measures, including unplanned readmission (p = 0.029), reoperation (p = 0.012), return to the OR (p = 0.012), and surgical complications (p = 0.021). The total RVUs and reimbursement for revision procedures were significantly greater than those for primary procedures (p < 0.001). However, when accounting for operative time, the RVU/minute and reimbursement/minute were similar between the two groups (n.s.). CONCLUSIONS Relative to primary ACL reconstruction, revision ACL procedures are associated with worse short-term outcomes-including unplanned readmission, reoperation, return to the OR, and surgical complications. A greater ASA score was independently predictive of revision ACL surgery. The current RVU system undervalues revision ACL procedures, considering the increased operative time and complexity of such procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy S Marx
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 1350, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Mark A Plantz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 1350, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| | - Erik B Gerlach
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 1350, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - John Carney
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 1350, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Peter R Swiatek
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 1350, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Colin K Cantrell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 1350, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Vehniah K Tjong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 1350, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Madhan AS, Ganley TJ, McKay SD, Pandya NK, Patel NM. Trends in Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis With ACL Reconstruction in Children and Adolescents. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10:23259671221088049. [PMID: 35400143 PMCID: PMC8990701 DOI: 10.1177/23259671221088049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) and lateral extra-articular
tenodesis (LET) show promise in lowering the risk of rerupture after
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but there are little data
on surgeon practices and preferences in children and adolescents. Purpose: To quantify surgeon practices regarding ALLR and LET in the pediatric
population. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: An electronic survey was administered to 87 surgeons in the Pediatric
Research in Sports Medicine society. The questionnaire asked several
questions about surgeon and practice characteristics as well as indications,
preferences, and techniques for ALLR or LET in the context of primary and
revision pediatric ACLR. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to
evaluate factors that affect surgical preferences. Results: A total of 63 surgeons completed the survey, of whom 62% performed ≥50
pediatric ACLRs annually; 56% sometimes performed anterolateral augmentation
with primary ACLR, and 79% with revision ACLR. The most common indications
for ALLR or LET in the primary setting were high-grade pivot shift, knee
hyperextension, generalized laxity, and type of sports participation.
Surgeons whose practice was >75% sports medicine were more likely to
perform ALLR or LET with both primary and revision ACLR (P
= .005 and P < .001, respectively). Those who had
completed a sports medicine fellowship were more likely to perform these
procedures than those with only pediatric orthopaedic training, in both
primary (68% vs 36%; P = .01) and revision scenarios (92%
vs 60%; P = .002). Of the 28 respondents who did not
perform ALLR or LET with primary ACLR, 75% cited insufficient evidence as
the reason. However, 96% of surgeons who did perform these procedures
expressed interest in studying them prospectively, and 87% were willing to
randomize patients. Conclusion: Findings indicated that 56% of pediatric sports surgeons sometimes perform
anterolateral augmentation with primary ACLR and 79% with revision ACLR.
Surgeons with sports medicine fellowship training or a mostly sports
practice were more likely to perform these procedures. Insufficient evidence
was the most common reason given by surgeons who did not perform
anterolateral augmentation. However, there was substantial willingness to
prospectively study and even randomize pediatric patients to assess the
impact of ALLR or LET in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin S. Madhan
- Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | - Nirav K. Pandya
- University of California, San Francisco, Benioff Children’s Hospital, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Neeraj M. Patel
- Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Midttun E, Andersen MT, Engebretsen L, Visnes H, Fenstad AM, Gjertsen JE, Persson A. Good validity in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register: assessment of data quality for key variables in primary and revision cruciate ligament reconstructions from 2004 to 2013. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:231. [PMID: 35264137 PMCID: PMC8908681 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05183-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Norwegian Knee Ligament Register was founded in 2004 to provide representative and reliable data on cruciate ligament surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of key variables in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register to reveal and prevent systematic errors or incompleteness, which can lead to biased reports and study conclusions. Method We included a stratified cluster sample of 83 patients that had undergone both primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. A total of 166 medical records were reviewed and compared with their corresponding data in the database of the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register. We assessed the validity of a selection of key variables using medical records as a reference standard to compute the positive predictive values of the register data for the variables. Results The positive predictive values for the variables of primary and revision surgery ranged from 92 to 100% and from 39 to 100% with a mean positive predictive value of 99% and 88% respectively. Data on intraoperative findings and surgical details had high positive predictive values, ranging from 91 to 100% for both primary and revision surgery. The positive predictive value for the variable “date of injury” was 92% for primary surgeries but only 39% for revision surgeries. The positive predictive value for “activity at the time of injury” was 99% for primary surgeries and 52% for revisions. Conclusion Overall, the data quality of the key variables examined in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register was high, making the register a valid source for research. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05183-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Espen Midttun
- Department of Neurology, Førde Central Hospital, Svanehaugvegen 2, 6812, Førde, Norway.
| | | | - Lars Engebretsen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | - Håvard Visnes
- Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Norwegian Knee Ligament Register, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Orthopaedics, Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Anne Marie Fenstad
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Norwegian Knee Ligament Register, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,The Norwegian National Advisory Unit On Arthroplasty and Hip Fractures, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jan-Erik Gjertsen
- The Norwegian National Advisory Unit On Arthroplasty and Hip Fractures, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Andreas Persson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Norwegian Knee Ligament Register, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rayes J, Ouanezar H, Haidar IM, Ngbilo C, Fradin T, Vieira TD, Freychet B, Sonnery-Cottet B. Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft Combined With Modified Lemaire Technique Versus Hamstring Graft Combined With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Clinical Comparative Matched Study With a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years From The SANTI Study Group. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50:395-403. [PMID: 34898285 DOI: 10.1177/03635465211061123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has recently been correlated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced failure rates in revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). However, no data are available on clinical outcomes and reoperation after revision ACLR using different LET procedures. PURPOSE To compare the clinical outcomes of ACL + anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft (HT-ALL) and a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft + modified Lemaire tenodesis procedure (BPTB-Lemaire) in the setting of revision ACLR and to determine whether ALL reconstruction is associated with an increased rate of adverse outcomes when compared with a modified Lemaire tenodesis procedure. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS Descriptive data and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected from patients who underwent revision ACLR with LET between 2009 and 2018 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients with an HT autograft combined with ALL reconstruction (HT-ALL group) were matched in a 1:1 propensity ratio to patients with a BPTB autograft combined with a modified Lemaire LET procedure (BPTB-Lemaire group). The evaluated parameters included complications and reoperations; knee laxity tests; return to sports; and various scores, including the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury scale, Marx activity rating scale, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation form, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. RESULTS In total, 36 matched pairs were included in the analysis. The mean follow-up durations for the BPTB-Lemaire and HT-ALL groups were 56 ± 35 and 57 ± 23 months, respectively (P = .91). No significant differences were found in graft rupture rate (HT-ALL, 0%; BPTB-Lemaire, 11.1%; P = .13) or reoperations (HT-ALL, 8.3%; BPTB-Lemaire, 22.2%; P = .23). No specific complications with regard to LET were noted in either group. Additionally, there were no significant differences in knee laxity parameters, return to sports, or clinical scores between the groups at the final follow-up, except for the Tegner activity scale score (HT-ALL, 6.4; BPTB-Lemaire, 7.3; P = .03). HT-ALL was associated with a shorter surgical time (41.4 vs 59.8 minutes; P < .0001). CONCLUSION HT-ALL was at least equivalent, in terms of clinical outcomes, to the more commonly performed procedure, BPTB-Lemaire. Performing ALL reconstruction in the setting of revision ACLR is therefore safe and effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnny Rayes
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France.,Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | | | - Ibrahim M Haidar
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France.,Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Cedric Ngbilo
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France.,Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Fradin
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France.,Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Thais Dutra Vieira
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France.,Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Benjamin Freychet
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France.,Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France.,Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Winkler PW, Vivacqua T, Thomassen S, Lovse L, Lesniak BP, Getgood AMJ, Musahl V. Quadriceps tendon autograft is becoming increasingly popular in revision ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30:149-160. [PMID: 33591370 PMCID: PMC8800889 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06478-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate trends in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R), with emphasis on intra-articular findings, grafts, and concurrent procedures. It was hypothesized that revision ACL-Rs over time show a trend toward increased complexity with increased use of autografts over allografts. METHODS This was a two-center retrospective study including patients undergoing revision ACL-R between 2010 and 2020. Demographic and surgical data including intra-articular findings and concurrent procedures were collected and compared for the time periods 2010-2014 and 2015-2020. All collected variables were compared between three pre-defined age groups (< 20 years, 20-30 years, > 30 years), right and left knees, and males and females. A time series analysis was performed to assess trends in revision ACL-R. RESULTS This study included 260 patients with a mean age of 26.2 ± 9.4 years at the time of the most recent revision ACL-R, representing the first, second, third, and fourth revision ACL-R for 214 (82%), 35 (14%), 10 (4%), and 1 (< 1%) patients, respectively. Patients age > 30 years showed a significantly longer mean time from primary ACL-R to most recent revision ACL-R (11.1 years), compared to patients age < 20 years (2.2 years, p < 0.001) and age 20-30 years (5.5 years, p < 0.05). Quadriceps tendon autograft was used significantly more often in 2015-2020 compared to 2010-2014 (49% vs. 18%, p < 0.001). A high rate of concurrently performed procedures including meniscal repairs (45%), lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET; 31%), osteotomies (13%), and meniscal allograft transplantations (11%) was shown. Concurrent LET was associated with intact cartilage and severely abnormal preoperative knee laxity and showed a statistically significant and linear increase over time (p < 0.05). Intact cartilage (41%, p < 0.05), concurrent medial meniscal repairs (39%, p < 0.05), and LET (35%, non-significant) were most frequently observed in patients aged < 20 years. CONCLUSION Quadriceps tendon autograft and concurrent LET are becoming increasingly popular in revision ACL-R. Intact cartilage and severely abnormal preoperative knee laxity represent indications for LET in revision ACL-R. The high rate of concurrent procedures observed demonstrates the high surgical demands of revision ACL-R. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp W. Winkler
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 S. Water St., Pittsburgh, PA 15203 USA ,grid.15474.330000 0004 0477 2438Department for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Thiago Vivacqua
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, 3M Centre, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7 Canada
| | - Stephan Thomassen
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, 3M Centre, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7 Canada
| | - Lisa Lovse
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, 3M Centre, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7 Canada
| | - Bryson P. Lesniak
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 S. Water St., Pittsburgh, PA 15203 USA
| | - Alan M. J. Getgood
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, 3M Centre, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 3K7 Canada
| | - Volker Musahl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 S. Water St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Eggeling L, Drenck TC, Frings J, Krause M, Korthaus A, Krukenberg A, Frosch KH, Akoto R. Additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis in revision ACL reconstruction does not influence the outcome of patients with low-grade anterior knee laxity. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142:291-299. [PMID: 34455475 PMCID: PMC8783865 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04145-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is limited evidence on the indications of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in revision ACLR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the LET in patients with revision ACLR with preoperative low-grade anterior knee laxity. METHODS Between 2013 and 2018, 78 patients who underwent revision ACLR with preoperative low-grade anterior knee laxity [≤ 5 mm side-to-side difference (SSD)] were included in the retrospective cohort study. An additional modified Lemaire tenodesis was performed in 23 patients during revision ACLR and patients were clinically examined with a minimum of 2 years after revision surgery. Postoperative failure of the revision ACLR was defined as SSD in Rolimeter® testing ≥ 5 mm or pivot-shift grade 2/3. RESULTS In total, failure of the revision ACLR occurred in 11.5% (n = 9) of the cases at a mean follow-up of 28.7 ± 8.8 (24-67) months. Patients with an additional LET and revision ACLR did not show a significantly reduced failure rate (13% vs. 11%) or an improved clinical outcome according to the postoperative functional scores or pain in regards to patients with an isolated revision ACLR (Tegner 5.7 ± 1.3 vs. 5.9 ± 1.5, n.s.; IKDC 77.5 ± 16.2 vs. 80.1 ± 14.9, n.s., Lysholm 81.9 ± 14.2 vs. 83.8 ± 14.5, n.s.; VAS 1.9 ± 2.2 vs. 1.2 ± 1.7, n.s.). CONCLUSIONS An additional LET in patients with revision ACLR with low-grade anterior knee laxity does not influence patient-related outcomes or failure rates. Subjects with preoperative low-grade anterior knee laxity may not benefit from a LET in revision ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Eggeling
- Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Lohmühlenstraße 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Traumatology, BG Hospital Hamburg, Bergedorfer Str. 10, 21033, Hamburg, Germany
| | - T C Drenck
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Traumatology, BG Hospital Hamburg, Bergedorfer Str. 10, 21033, Hamburg, Germany
| | - J Frings
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - M Krause
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Korthaus
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Krukenberg
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karl-Heinz Frosch
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Traumatology, BG Hospital Hamburg, Bergedorfer Str. 10, 21033, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ralph Akoto
- Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Lohmühlenstraße 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany.
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Traumatology, BG Hospital Hamburg, Bergedorfer Str. 10, 21033, Hamburg, Germany.
- Cologne Merheim Medical Center, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Saithna A, Daggett M, Helito CP, Monaco E, Franck F, Vieira TD, Pioger C, Kim JG, Sonnery-Cottet B. Clinical Results of Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Narrative Review from the SANTI Study Group. J Knee Surg 2021; 34:962-970. [PMID: 32023631 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Lateral extraarticular procedures (LEAPs) in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knee were widely abandoned in the 1990s but have seen a recent resurgence. The aim of this review was to demonstrate that anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) is associated with evidence of significant advantages and no evidence of historical concerns. A narrative review of the literature was performed. Combined ACL + ALLR is associated with improved outcomes when compared against isolated ACL reconstruction, including a significantly lower risk of ACL graft rupture (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.327, 95% CI: 0.130-0.758), a significantly lower risk of reoperation for secondary meniscectomy following medial meniscal repair at the time of ACL reconstruction (HR: 0.443, 95% CI: 0.218-0.866), significantly increased likelihood of return to the preinjury level of sport following primary (odds ratio [OR]: 1.938, 95% CI: 1.174-3.224) and revision ACL reconstruction (57.1 vs. 25.6%, respectively; p = 0.008), and in chronic ACL injuries, less residual pivot shift (9.1 vs. 35.3%, p = 0.011), and better IKDC (92.7 ± 5.9 vs. 87.1 ± 9.0, p = 0.0013) and Lysholm (95.4 ± 5.3 vs. 90.0 ± 7.1, p < 0.0001) scores, and no evidence of historical concerns. Combined ACLR + ALLR is associated with excellent clinical outcomes with no evidence of the adverse events that led to the historical widespread abandonment of other types of LEAP. Specifically, comparative series have demonstrated significant advantages of ALLR when compared against isolated ACLR with respect to reduced rates of ACL graft rupture, secondary meniscectomy, persistent instability, and significantly improved functional outcomes and improved return to sport metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adnan Saithna
- Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, Missouri.,Sano Orthopedics, Overland Park, Kansas.,School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Matt Daggett
- Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, Missouri.,Sano Orthopedics, Overland Park, Kansas
| | - Camilo Partezani Helito
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Grupo de Joelho, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Edoardo Monaco
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Florent Franck
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Centre Orthopedique Santy, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Lyon, France
| | - Thais Dutra Vieira
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Centre Orthopedique Santy, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Lyon, France.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Groupe Ramsay-Generale de Sante, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | - Charles Pioger
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Centre Orthopedique Santy, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Lyon, France
| | - Jin Goo Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Centre Orthopedique Santy, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Lyon, France.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Groupe Ramsay-Generale de Sante, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pioger C, Saithna A, Rayes J, Haidar IM, Fradin T, Ngbilo C, Vieira TD, Cavaignac E, Sonnery-Cottet B. Influence of Preoperative Tunnel Widening On the Outcomes of a Single Stage-Only Approach to Every Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Analysis of 409 Consecutive Patients From the SANTI Study Group. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49:1431-1440. [PMID: 33689510 DOI: 10.1177/0363546521996389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative tunnel widening is a frequently reported indication for performing a 2-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) instead of a single-stage procedure. However, the strength of the available evidence to support a 2-stage strategy is low. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS The purpose was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a single stage-only approach to revision ACLR. It was hypothesized that this approach would be associated with significant improvements from baseline in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and knee stability and that there would be no significant differences in any postoperative outcomes between patients with and without preoperative tunnel widening. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted of a large series of consecutive patients undergoing revision ACLR with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Preoperative tunnel widening was assessed using digital radiographs. All patients underwent single-stage surgery with an outside-in technique, regardless of the degree of tunnel widening. Clinical outcomes were compared according to whether tunnel widening was present (either tunnel ≥12 mm) or not (both tunnels <12 mm). RESULTS The study included 409 patients with a mean ± SD follow-up of 69.6 ± 29.0 months. After revision ACLR, there was a significant reduction in the side-to-side anteroposterior laxity difference, from 7.7 ± 2.2 mm preoperatively to 1.2 ± 1.1 mm at 2 years (P < .001). The mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and all subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) exceeded the thresholds for the Patient Acceptable Symptom State defined for primary ACLR. An overall 358 patients had retrievable preoperative radiographs. According to the tunnel diameter measurements, 111 patients were allocated to group A (both tunnels <12 mm) and 247 patients to group B (either/both tunnels ≥12 mm). There were no significant differences between groups with respect to anteroposterior side-to-side laxity difference, graft rupture rates, non-graft rupture related reoperations, or contralateral anterior cruciate ligament injury rates. There was also no significant difference between groups that exceeded minimal detectable change thresholds for any of the PROMs recorded (ACL-RSI [Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sports After Injury], Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC, KOOS). CONCLUSION A single-stage approach to revision ACLR is associated with excellent clinical results when an outside-in drilling technique is utilized. The presence of preoperative tunnel widening does not significantly influence PROMs, knee stability, graft rupture rates, or non-graft rupture related reoperation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Pioger
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France; Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Adnan Saithna
- Arizona Brain, Spine and Sports Injuries Center, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Johnny Rayes
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France; Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Ibrahim M Haidar
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France; Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Fradin
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France; Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Cedric Ngbilo
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France; Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Thais Dutra Vieira
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France; Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Etienne Cavaignac
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Trauma, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Toulouse, France
| | - Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
- Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France; Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ventura A, Legnani C, Boisio F, Borgo E, Peretti GM. The association of extra-articular tenodesis restores rotational stability more effectively compared to contralateral hamstring tendon autografts ACL reconstruction alone in patients undergoing ACL revision surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2021; 107:102739. [PMID: 33390331 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest about lateral extra-articular procedures performed in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, as they can reduce the positivity to pivot shift test by acting on rotational instability. The purpose of the present study is to compare the postoperative functional outcomes of ACL revision surgery using contralateral hamstring tendon autografts with or without extra-articular tenodesis. HYPOTHESIS The hypothesis is that combined extra-articular tenodesis gives better rotational stability following revision ACL surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-four patients who underwent ACL revision surgery were retrospectively reviewed at an average follow-up of 4.5 years; 12 underwent contralateral hamstring tendon autografts reconstruction (group A) while in 12 extra-articular tenodesis was associated (group B). Assessment included Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form, Tegner activity level and objective evaluation (range of motion, Lachman test, pivot-shift test and KT-1000 instrumented laxity testing). RESULTS Follow-up examination showed that there were no statistically significant differences in Lysholm, IKDC and Tegner scores between the groups (p=n.s.). Similarly, no differences concerning anterior tibial translation as measured with KT-1000 arthrometer were reported between the groups (p=n.s.); the percentage of positivity to pivot shift test was significantly higher in patients in group A (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The association of extra-articular tenodesis restores rotational stability more effectively compared to contralateral hamstring tendon autografts ACL revision surgery alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Ventura
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Sports Traumatology and Minimally Invasive Articular Surgery Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Legnani
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Sports Traumatology and Minimally Invasive Articular Surgery Center, Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Enrico Borgo
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Sports Traumatology and Minimally Invasive Articular Surgery Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe M Peretti
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gali JC, Gali Filho JC, Marques MF, Almeida TA, Cintra da Silva PA, LaPrade RF. Capsulo-osseous Layer Retensioning and Distal Kaplan Fiber Surgical Reconstruction: A Proposed Anatomical Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Approach. Arthrosc Tech 2021; 10:e159-e164. [PMID: 33532223 PMCID: PMC7823100 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament intra-articular reconstruction may require extra-articular reinforcement in certain situations. As knee lateral region anatomical and biomechanical knowledge has increased with new research, it has been reported that the iliotibial band is important in the anterolateral stabilization of the knee. Possible indications for a "more anatomical" extra-articular tenodesis focusing on capsulo-osseous layer tensioning and distal Kaplan fibers reconstruction are reported, surgical approach details are described, and scientific data that gives support for this procedure are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio Cesar Gali
- Faculty of Medical Science and Health, Catholic University of São Paulo, Sorocaba
- Address correspondence to Julio Cesar Gali, M.D., Ph.D., Faculty of Medical Science and Health, Catholic University of São Paulo, R. Jouberte Wey 290, Sorocaba-SP, Brazil. 18030070.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Letter to the editor "Lateral extra-articular tenodesis in patients with revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and high-grade anterior knee instability. [The Knee 27 (2020) 1451-1457]". Knee 2021; 28:410-411. [PMID: 33487524 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.12.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
22
|
Hurley ET, Manjunath AK, Strauss EJ, Jazrawi LM, Alaia MJ. Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Extra-Articular Augmentation: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy 2021; 37:381-387. [PMID: 32562759 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the current study is to systematically review the current evidence in the literature to ascertain rates of return to play after ACLR with extra-articular augmentation (EA). METHODS A literature search was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included if they evaluated and reported on return to play after ACLR + EA; case studies and review articles were excluded. The outcomes measured focused on (1) return to play, (2) return to play at the same or higher level, and (3) timing of return to play. Qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis were performed using SPSS. RESULTS Overall, 19 studies met our inclusion criteria. Among patients undergoing primary ACLR, 82.8% to 100% were able to return to play, with 64% to 100% able to return at the same or higher level of play. All professional athletes were able to return to play, and 85.7% to 100% were able to return to the same level of preoperative play. The mean time to return was 5 to 11 months in those undergoing primary ACLR + EA. Among those undergoing revision ACLR, 50% to 88.4% were able to return to play, with 41.5% to 77.8% able to return at the same or higher level of play. None of the 5 studies that compared rate of return to play (at any level) between ACLR + EA and ACLR alone found a significant difference between them. However, among the 6 studies that compared rate of return to play at the same level between ACLR + EA and ACLR alone, 2 studies found a significantly higher rate of return to play with ACLR + EA. CONCLUSION ACLR + EA resulted in high levels of return to play in those undergoing either primary or revision ACLR. Additionally, comparative studies of patients undergoing primary ACLR with or without EA reported similarly high rates of return to play. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, systematic review of level I to IV studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eoghan T Hurley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, U.S.A..
| | - Amit K Manjunath
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, U.S.A
| | - Eric J Strauss
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, U.S.A
| | - Laith M Jazrawi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, U.S.A
| | - Michael J Alaia
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Goes RA, Cossich VRA, França BR, Campos AS, Souza GGA, Bastos RDC, Grangeiro Neto JA. RETURN TO PLAY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION. REV BRAS MED ESPORTE 2020. [DOI: 10.1590/1517-8692202026062019_0056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear represents more than half of all knee injuries in sports that involve body rotations and sudden changes of direction. Discharging the athlete for return to play (RTP) post-ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is a difficult task with multidisciplinary responsibility. For many years, a six-month period post-ACLR was adopted as the only criterion for RTP. However, it is now suggested that RTP should not be exclusively time-based, but to clinical data and systematic assessments. Despite the importance of post-ACLR factors for RTP, pre- and peri-ACLR factors must also be considered. Historically, ACLR is performed with the hamstring or autologous patellar tendons, although the choice of graft is still an open and constantly evolving theme. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction and repair of meniscal ramp tear associated with ACLR have recently been suggested as strategies for improving knee joint stability. Subjective questionnaires are easy to apply, and help identify physical or psychological factors that can hamper RTP. Functional tests, such as hop tests and strength assessment by means of isokinetic dynamometers, are fundamental tools for decision making when associated with clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging. Recently, the capacity to generate force explosively has been incorporated into the muscle strength assessment. This is quantified through the rate of torque development (RTD). Due to characteristics inherent to the practice of sport, there is an extremely short time available for produce strength. Thus, RTD seems to better represent athletic demands than the maximum strength assessment alone. This review investigates the pre-, peri- and post-ACLR factors established in the literature, and shares our clinical practice, which we consider to be best practice for RTP. Level of evidence V; Specialist opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo A. Goes
- Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia Jammil Haddad, Brazil
| | - Victor R. A. Cossich
- Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia Jammil Haddad, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Bráulio R. França
- Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia Jammil Haddad, Brazil; Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia Jammil Haddad, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vermeijden HD, Yang XA, van der List JP, DiFelice GS, Rademakers MV, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. Trauma and femoral tunnel position are the most common failure modes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 28:3666-3675. [PMID: 32691095 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06160-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To improve outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), it is important to understand the reasons for failure of this procedure. This systematic review was performed to identify current failure modes of ACLR. METHODS A systematic search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and annual registries for ACLR failures. Studies were included when failure modes were reported (I) of ≥ 10 patients and (II) at a minimum of two-year follow-up. Modes of failure were also compared between different graft types and in femoral tunnel positions. RESULTS This review included 24 cohort studies and 4 registry-based studies (1 level I, 1 level II, 10 level III, and 16 level IV studies). Overall, a total of 3657 failures were identified. The most common single failure mode of ACLR was new trauma (38%), followed by technical errors (22%), combined causes (i.e. multiple failure mechanisms; 19%), and biological failures (i.e. failure due to infection or laxity without traumatic or technical considerations; 8%). Technical causes also played a contributing role in 17% of all failures. Femoral tunnel malposition was the most common cause of technical failure (63%). When specifically looking at the bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstring (HT) autografts, trauma was the most common failure mode in both, whereas biological failure was more pronounced in the HT group (4% vs. 22%, respectively). Technical errors were more common following transtibial as compared to anteromedial portal techniques (49% vs. 26%). CONCLUSION Trauma is the single leading cause of ACLR failure, followed by technical errors, and combined causes. Technical errors seemed to play a major or contributing role in large part of reported failures, with femoral tunnel malposition being the leading cause of failure. Trauma was also the most common failure mode in both BPTB and HT grafts. Technical errors were a more common failure mode following transtibial than anteromedial portal technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harmen D Vermeijden
- Orthopaedic Sports Medicine and Trauma Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA. .,Amsterdam UMC, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Xiuyi A Yang
- Orthopaedic Sports Medicine and Trauma Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jelle P van der List
- Orthopaedic Sports Medicine and Trauma Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.,Amsterdam UMC, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Gregory S DiFelice
- Orthopaedic Sports Medicine and Trauma Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maarten V Rademakers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, Academic Center for Evidence Based Sports Medicine (ACES), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Collaboration on Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lateral extra-articular tenodesis in patients with revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and high-grade anterior knee instability. Knee 2020; 27:1451-1457. [PMID: 33010761 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Additional lateral extra-articular procedures can reduce the risk of failure of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). There is limited evidence on the effect of lateral extra-articular procedures in revision ACL surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in combination with revision ACLR for combined ACL graft failure and high-grade anterior knee instability. METHODS Between 2016 and 2018, 75 patients with graft failure after primary ACLR and high-grade anterior knee instability who received revision ACLR were included in the retrospective study. High-grade anterior knee instability was defined as high-grade pivot-shift or side-to-side difference of more than six millimeters in Rolimeter®-testing. An additional modified Lemaire tenodesis was performed in 59 patients during revision ACLR. Seventy-three patients were clinically examined with a minimum of two years after revision surgery. RESULTS Failure of the revision ACLR occurred in 8.2% (n = 6) of the cases. LET lead to significant decreased failure rates (five percent vs. 21%, p = .045) and decreased incidence of a positive pivot-shift in patients with revision ACLR and high-grade anterior knee instability in comparison to patients without LET. Also, postoperative functional scores were significantly increased in the group of additional LET. CONCLUSIONS Additional LET in patients with revision ACLR and high-grade anterior instability significantly reduces the risk of failure of revision ACLR, the incidence of pivot-shift and increases postoperative functional outcome.
Collapse
|
26
|
Resident Involvement Is Not Associated With Increased Risk of Postoperative Complications After Arthroscopic Knee Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Study. Arthroscopy 2020; 36:2689-2695. [PMID: 32389776 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether resident involvement in knee arthroscopy procedures affects postoperative complications or operative times. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was queried to identify patients who underwent common knee arthroscopy procedures between 2006 through 2012. Patients with a history of knee arthroplasty, septic arthritis or osteomyelitis of the knee, concomitant open or mini-open procedures, or without information on resident involvement were excluded. A 1:1 propensity score match was performed based on age, sex, obesity, smoking history, and American Society of Anesthesiologist classification to match cases with resident involved to nonresident cases. Fisher exact tests, Pearson's χ2 tests, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare patient demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day complications. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare operative time and length of hospital stay between the 2 groups, with statistical significance defined as P < .05. RESULTS After matching, 2954 cases (50% resident involvement) were included in the study with no significant differences in demographics or comorbidities between the 2 cohorts. The overall rate of 30-day complications was 1.1% in the nonresident and resident involved group (P = 1.000). There was no significant difference in postoperative surgical (nonresident vs resident involved: 0.48% vs 0.83%, P = .2498) or medical (nonresident vs resident involved: 0.62% vs 0.83%, P = .5111) complications. However, knee arthroscopy cases that residents were involved with had significantly longer operative times (69.8 vs 66.8 minutes, P = .0002), and length of hospital stay (0.85 vs 0.21 days, P = .0332) when compared with cases performed without a resident. CONCLUSIONS Resident involvement in knee arthroscopy procedures is not a significant risk for medical or surgical 30-day postoperative complications. Resident participation in knee arthroscopy was associated with statistically significant but likely clinically insignificant increased operative time as well as length of hospital stay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Collapse
|
27
|
Lian J, Diermeier T, Meghpara M, Popchak A, Smith CN, Kuroda R, Zaffagnini S, Samuelsson K, Karlsson J, Irrgang JJ, Musahl V. Rotatory Knee Laxity Exists on a Continuum in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102:213-220. [PMID: 31876642 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.19.00502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this investigation was to compare the magnitude of rotatory knee laxity in patients with a partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear, those with a complete ACL tear, and those who had undergone a failed ACL reconstruction. It was hypothesized that rotatory knee laxity would increase with increasing injury grade, with knees with partial ACL tears demonstrating the lowest rotatory laxity and knees that had undergone failed ACL reconstruction demonstrating the highest rotatory laxity. METHODS A prospective multicenter study cohort of 354 patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction between 2012 and 2018 was examined. All patients had both injured and contralateral healthy knees evaluated using standardized, preoperative quantitative pivot shift testing, determined by a validated, image-based tablet software application and a surface-mounted accelerometer. Quantitative pivot shift was compared with the contralateral healthy knee in 20 patients with partial ACL tears, 257 patients with complete ACL tears, and 27 patients who had undergone a failed ACL reconstruction. Comparisons were made using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc 2-sample t tests with Bonferroni correction. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS There were stepwise increases in side-to-side differences in quantitative pivot shift in terms of lateral knee compartment translation for patients with partial ACL tears (mean [and standard deviation], 1.4 ± 1.5 mm), those with complete ACL tears (2.5 ± 2.1 mm), and those who had undergone failed ACL reconstruction (3.3 ± 1.9 mm) (p = 0.01) and increases in terms of lateral compartment acceleration for patients with partial ACL tears (0.7 ± 1.4 m/s), those with complete ACL tears (2.3 ± 3.1 m/s), and those who had undergone failed ACL reconstruction (2.4 ± 5.5 m/s) (p = 0.01). A significant difference in lateral knee compartment translation was found when comparing patients with partial ACL tears and those with complete ACL tears (1.2 ± 2.1 mm [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.2 to 2.1 mm]; p = 0.02) and patients with partial ACL tears and those who had undergone failed ACL reconstruction (1.9 ± 1.7 mm [95% CI, 0.8 to 2.9 mm]; p = 0.001), but not when comparing patients with complete ACL tears and those who had undergone failed ACL reconstruction (0.8 ± 2.1 [95% CI, -0.1 to 1.6 mm]; p = 0.09). Increased lateral compartment acceleration was found when comparing patients with partial ACL tears and those with complete ACL tears (1.5 ± 3.0 m/s [95% CI, 0.8 to 2.3 m/s]; p = 0.0002), but not when comparing patients with complete ACL tears and those who had undergone failed ACL reconstruction (0.1 ± 3.4 m/s [95% CI, -2.2 to 2.4 m/s]; p = 0.93) or patients with partial ACL tears and those who had undergone failed ACL reconstruction (1.7 ± 4.2 m/s [95% CI, -0.7 to 4.0 m/s]; p = 0.16). An increasing lateral compartment translation of the contralateral, ACL-healthy knee was found in patients with partial ACL tears (0.8 mm), those with complete ACL tears (1.2 mm), and those who had undergone failed ACL reconstruction (1.7 mm) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS A progressive increase in rotatory knee laxity, defined by side-to-side differences in quantitative pivot shift, was observed in patients with partial ACL tears, those with complete ACL tears, and those who had undergone failed ACL reconstruction. These results may be helpful when assessing outcomes and considering indications for the management of high-grade rotatory knee laxity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayson Lian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Theresa Diermeier
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Orthopaedic Sport Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mitchell Meghpara
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Adam Popchak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Clair N Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ryosuke Kuroda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Stefano Zaffagnini
- Laboratorio di Biomeccanica e Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Kristian Samuelsson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jón Karlsson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - James J Irrgang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Volker Musahl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Grassi A, Zicaro JP, Costa-Paz M, Samuelsson K, Wilson A, Zaffagnini S, Condello V. Good mid-term outcomes and low rates of residual rotatory laxity, complications and failures after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 28:418-431. [PMID: 31324964 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05625-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Residual rotational instability remains a controversial factor when analysing failure rates of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Anatomical and biomechanical studies have demonstrated a very important role of anterolateral structures for rotational control. Revision ACL is considered one of the main indications for a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). Yet, few series evaluating these procedures are published. PURPOSE To perform a systematic review of studies that assessed outcomes in patients treated with revision ACL surgery associated with a lateral extra-articular procedure. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed in February 2018 using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Search and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were series of ACL revision reconstructions associated with lateral extra-articular procedures. Clinical outcomes (Lysholm, subjective IKDC, KOOS, Cincinnati and WOMAC), joint stability measures (Lachman test, pivot-shift, arthrometer assessment and navigation assessment), graft type, reported chondral and meniscal injury, radiographic outcomes, complications and failures were recorded. Articles were assessed for level of evidence and methodology using a modification of the ACL Methodology Score (AMS) system. RESULTS Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria out of the 231 abstracts; 9 retrospective evaluations, two prospective cohorts and one combination of two populations (a retrospective and prospective series). A total of 851 patients evaluated with a mean age of 28.8 years (range 16-68 years) and a weighted mean follow-up of 4.9 years (range 1-10 years). The mean time from primary ACL reconstruction to revision was 5.3 years (reported in 7 studies, including 710 patients). The Lysholm, IKDC, and KOOS scores indicated favorable results in studies that reported these outcomes. Objective evaluations reported 86% objective A and B IKDC results, 2.6 mm mean side-to-side arthrometric difference and 80% negative pivot-shift. About 74% of patients returned to their previous sport (evaluated in six studies). Few studies reported radiological evaluation. Fifty-nine complications (8.0%) and 24 failures (3.6%) were reported. The mean modified ACL Methodology Score was 55.5 (range 32-72). CONCLUSION Good mid-term results were obtained for combined revision ACL reconstruction and lateral extra-articular procedures. Despite the fact that in clinical practice LET are a common indication associated with revision ACL, there are no high-level studies supporting this technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Grassi
- IIa Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Juan Pablo Zicaro
- Department of Knee Arthroscopy, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Matias Costa-Paz
- Department of Knee Arthroscopy, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Kristian Samuelsson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Adrian Wilson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 9NA, UK
| | - Stefano Zaffagnini
- IIa Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy.,Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie DIBINEM, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Condello
- Joint Preservation and Reconstructive Surgery and Sports Medicine Unit, Humanitas Castelli Clinic, Bergamo, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jaecker V, Ibe P, Endler CH, Pfeiffer TR, Herbort M, Shafizadeh S. High Risk of Tunnel Convergence in Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47:2110-2115. [PMID: 31194569 DOI: 10.1177/0363546519854220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is being increasingly added to primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to address residual anterolateral rotatory instability. However, currently there is a lack of knowledge on how close the femoral tunnels are when combining these procedures. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESES To assess the risk of tunnel convergence in combined ACL and LET procedures using 2 different surgical techniques (Lemaire and MacIntosh). It was hypothesized that the risk of tunnel convergence would be greater when using the more distally located Lemaire position. The authors further hypothesized that tunnel proximity would be influenced by knee size. STUDY DESIGN Controlled laboratory study. METHODS Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were used for this study. In each specimen, an anatomic ACL femoral tunnel and 2 LET tunnels were drilled using the Lemaire and MacIntosh positions, respectively. After knee dissection, minimal distances between each ACL and LET tunnel were directly measured on the lateral femoral cortex. Furthermore, computed tomography scans were obtained to measure intertunnel convergence and lateral femoral condyle (LFC) width. On the basis of the average LFC width, knees were divided into large and small knees to determine a relationship between knee size and tunnel convergence. RESULTS Convergence of ACL and LET tunnels occurred in 7 of 10 cases (70%) using the Lemaire attachment position. All tunnel collisions occurred directly on the lateral femoral cortex, while intertunnel (intramedullary) conflicts were not observed. Collisions emerged in both small (n = 4) and large (n = 3) knees. Critical tunnel convergence did not occur using the MacIntosh position. The mean minimal distance between the LET and ACL tunnel using the Lemaire and MacIntosh positions was 3.1 ± 4.6 mm and 9.8 ± 5.4 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION Tunnel convergence was more frequently observed in combined ACL and LET reconstruction using the Lemaire technique, independent of the knee size. LET femoral tunnel positioning according to the MacIntosh reconstruction was not associated with tunnel collision. CLINICAL RELEVANCE These findings help to raise the awareness for the risk of tunnel convergence in combined ACL and LET procedures. Surgeons may contemplate adjustments on the ACL femoral tunnel drilling technique or fixation device when applying an additional Lemaire procedure. However, in the absence of clinical outcome studies comparing different LET techniques, it remains unclear which technique is superior in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Jaecker
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne Merheim Medical Centre, Köln, Germany
| | - Philip Ibe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Traumatology, Beta Clinic Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christoph H Endler
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas R Pfeiffer
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne Merheim Medical Centre, Köln, Germany
| | - Mirco Herbort
- Orthopaedic Surgery Munich, OCM Klinik GmbH, München, Germany
| | - Sven Shafizadeh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Traumatology, Witten/Herdecke University, Sana Medical Centre Cologne, Köln, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kircher J. Editorial Commentary: The Measurement of Knee Laxity: Instrumented Measurement and Stress Radiography for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries. Arthroscopy 2019; 35:1733-1735. [PMID: 31159960 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The measurement of anterior knee laxity in anterior cruciate ligament injuries is an established method for both clinical practice and clinical studies in regard to anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Stress radiography was succeeded or paralleled by instrumented testing with the development of standardized devices starting in the 1980s. Because knee stability depends on the flexion angle test, conditions need to be comparable for both instrumented testing and stress radiography. The lack of a general consensus becomes even more evident for testing and measuring rotational instability. Knee laxity measurement in all dimensions, such as with robots in cadaver studies, has not found its general application in the clinical setting yet, but will be expected in the near future.
Collapse
|
31
|
Johnson DL, Stirton JB. Editorial Commentary: Is the Key to Successful Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Addressing the Anterolateral Complex With a Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis? Arthroscopy 2018; 34:3214-3215. [PMID: 30509431 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
As the overall incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures continues to rise, the failure rates in reconstructive surgery remain relatively stable. Despite advances in our understanding of graft selection, anatomic reconstruction, addressing concomitant injuries, and the importance of rehabilitation, we continue to see failure rates in primary ACL reconstructions of up to 15%. Thus as the number of primary ACL reconstructions rises, so too does the number of revision ACL surgeries. This rising need for revision ACL reconstructions presents an even more daunting task because failure rates of up to 25% have been reported. Much of the current literature's focus is on improving outcomes and lowering these failure rates. Could adding a lateral extra-articular tenodesis to revision ACL surgery be the magic bullet we have been searching for to lower our failure rates? We question whether it is that simple.
Collapse
|