The Utility of Oral Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Compared With Standard Opioids Following Arthroscopic Meniscectomy: A Prospective Observational Study

Access to an Educational Video Preoperatively Has No Effect on Postoperative Opioid Use After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy of the Knee: A Prospective Cohort Study

Purpose

To determine whether access to a website with an educational video would decrease postoperative opioid use in patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

Methods

Enrolled patients who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy at a single center were randomized to either the intervention or control group prior to surgery. The intervention group received a card with access to an online educational video regarding opioids with their postoperative instructions; the control group did not. The online video was just over 5 minutes long and contained general information about the dangers of opioid use, how to safely dispose of unused opioids, and local support contact information. Data were collected by telephone 10 to 14 days postoperatively and analyzed with GraphPad Prism version 9.5.0. Patient characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, allergies, smoking, depression, alcohol abuse, American Society of Anesthesiologists level, diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, diabetes, substance abuse, employment status, workers' compensation, and sports participation were analyzed and correlated with postoperative opioid use.

Results

A total of 166 patients were included in this study, with 78 in the control group and 88 in the intervention group. Mean number of pills consumed was 3 in the control group and 2.2 in the intervention group. This difference did not reach statistical significance. Patients who were obese, smokers, or diagnosed with depression both consumed more opioids and were less likely to take no narcotics postoperatively. Patients who participated in sports consumed fewer total opioids on average than those who did not. Subgroup analysis of patients with higher risk factors did not show a difference between the control and intervention groups in the average amount of opioid used or the likelihood of using no narcotics. Among all patients, 82 (49%) used no narcotics postoperatively and 90% used 8 or fewer tablets.

Conclusions

Directing patients to an educational website and video is not an effective tool in decreasing opioid consumption. Patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy who are obese, active smokers, and clinically depressed or do not participate in sports are likely to use more postoperative narcotics. Regardless of access to the online educational video, half of patients used no narcotics.

Level of Evidence

Level II, prospective cohort.

Multimodal Pain Management After Outpatient Orthopedic Hand Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Purpose

Opioid stewardship ensures effective pain management while avoiding overprescribing of opioids after surgery. This prospective randomized study investigates the efficacy of a multimodal postoperative pain regimen compared to a traditional opioid-only pain regimen following elective outpatient orthopedic hand surgery. We hypothesized that patients receiving multimodal pain management would consume fewer opioids and report greater satisfaction than patients receiving only opioids.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing outpatient hand and upper extremity surgery performed by two board-certified fellowship-trained orthopedic hand surgeons at one institution were recruited and randomized into either a study or control group. The study group received a standing multimodal postoperative regimen consisting of scheduled oral acetaminophen and naproxen as well as oxycodone to be taken as needed. The control group received only oxycodone to be taken as needed. Postoperatively, daily pain levels, medication usage, refills, satisfaction, and adverse events were recorded. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results

Of the 112 patients enrolled, 54 were randomized to the control group, and 58 were randomized to the study group. Study and control group patients did not differ significantly based on daily average pain scores or daily worst pain scores. However, study group patients reported fewer average daily oxycodone intake and total oxycodone pill count (7.0 vs 2.4 total pills, P <.005). In addition, the study group patients were more likely to report satisfaction with their postoperative pain control than control regimen patient's and were more likely to use the same pain regimen again if required.

Conclusion

A multimodal postoperative pain regimen reduces opioid usage and has higher patient satisfaction rates in comparison to traditional opioid-only regimens. Use of multimodal pain regimens that use nonopioids, such as acetaminophen and naproxen, over an opioid should be considered for postoperative pain after orthopedic hand surgery.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic II.

Patient factors influencing the choice of opioid versus non-opioid postoperative analgesia following common sports procedures: a prospective survey study

Purpose

Despite established opioid-free protocols for postoperative analgesia after common orthopaedic sports procedures, many patients continue to request opioids postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to elucidate patient factors influencing preferences for opioid versus nonopioid postoperative analgesia.

Methods

Patients (age >/ = 15) without a history of a documented chronic pain disorder who were scheduled for one of ten sports procedure types from August 2020 to May 2021 were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if undergoing revision surgery, had concomitant injuries, had opioids use >3 months preoperatively, or unable to read English. Recruitment ended after 100 patients enrolled. At the patients' preoperative visit, patients were administered a written survey assessing pain medication preferences. Participants completed the Opioid Risk Tool survey, as well as Visual Analog Scale and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System surveys.

Results

One hundred patients participated in the study. Forty-two patients preferred opioids versus 58 patients preferring nonopioid postoperative analgesia. Patients preferring opiates were more likely to have had previous surgery (90.2% vs. 69.6%, p = 0.023) with post-operative pain managed with opiates (87.5% vs 55.4%, p = 0.003), higher preoperative Visual Analog Scale score (6±3.5 vs. 3±2, p < 0.001), reported post-operative pain as a reason for opioids preference (88.1% vs 20.0%, p < 0.001), and were less concerned about addiction (4.8% vs. 45.5%, p < 0.001) and side effects (11.9% vs. 52.7%, p < 0.001). For every unit increase in Visual Analog Scale score, the odds of preferring opioid pain control increased 1.41 times.

Conclusions

Patients with a history of prior surgery utilizing opioid pain control, higher Visual Analog Scale scores preoperatively, and concern for inadequately managed postoperative pain were more likely to prefer opioid pain control following common orthopaedic sports procedures. Patients may benefit from increased preoperative education about opioid risks and the role of multimodal pain management regimens.

Effect of a Postoperative Multimodal Opioid-Sparing Protocol vs Standard Opioid Prescribing on Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Knee or Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

In arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery, there is growing evidence that opioid-sparing protocols may reduce postoperative opioid consumption while adequately addressing patients' pain. However, there are a lack of prospective, comparative trials evaluating their effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of a multimodal, opioid-sparing approach to postoperative pain management compared with the current standard of care in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder or knee surgery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This randomized clinical trial was performed at 3 clinical sites in Ontario, Canada, and enrolled 200 patients from March 2021 to March 2022 with final follow-up completed in April 2022. Adult patients undergoing outpatient arthroscopic shoulder or knee surgery were followed up for 6 weeks postoperatively.

INTERVENTIONS

The opioid-sparing group (100 participants randomized) received a prescription of naproxen, acetaminophen (paracetamol), and pantoprazole; a limited rescue prescription of hydromorphone; and a patient educational infographic. The control group (100 participants randomized) received the current standard of care determined by the treating surgeon, which consisted of an opioid analgesic.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was postoperative oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption at 6 weeks after surgery. There were 5 secondary outcomes, including pain, patient satisfaction, opioid refills, quantity of OMEs prescribed at the time of hospital discharge, and adverse events at 6 weeks all reported at 6 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

Among the 200 patients who were randomized (mean age, 43 years; 73 women [38%]), 193 patients (97%) completed the trial; 98 of whom were randomized to receive standard care and 95 the opioid-sparing protocol. Patients in the opioid-sparing protocol consumed significantly fewer opioids (median, 0 mg; IQR, 0-8.0 mg) than patients in the control group (median, 40.0 mg; IQR, 7.5-105.0; z = -6.55; P < .001). Of the 5 prespecified secondary end points, 4 showed no significant difference. The mean amount of OMEs prescribed was 341.2 mg (95% CI, 310.2-372.2) in the standard care group and 40.4 mg (95% CI, 39.6-41.2) in the opioid-sparing group (mean difference, 300.8 mg; 95% CI, 269.4-332.3; P < .001). There was no significant difference in adverse events at 6 weeks (2 events [2.1%] in the standard care group vs 3 events [3.2%] in the opioid-sparing group), but more patients reported medication-related adverse effects in the standard care group (32% vs 19%, P = .048).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients who underwent arthroscopic knee or shoulder surgery, a multimodal opioid-sparing postoperative pain management protocol, compared with standard opioid prescribing, significantly reduced postoperative opioid consumption over 6 weeks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04566250.

Surgeon-Performed Saphenous Nerve Block at the Medial Femoral Condyle for Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy and Meniscus Repair: A Randomized Control Trial

Introduction

With the rising number of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy and meniscus repair procedures performed in outpatient surgical centers, there has been significant interest in limiting postoperative pain and optimizing recovery. Postoperative pain is a common reason for admission at these surgical centers, and opioid-related mortality is becoming an increasing concern. A surgeon-performed saphenous nerve block (SNB) represents a promising adjunct treatment option for pain control. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine if an SNB would result in decreased postoperative pain and opioid usage compared to control following arthroscopic meniscus repair or partial meniscectomy.

Methods

We randomized patients between two groups: one receiving an SNB and the other without an SNB. The operating surgeon performed the SNB using a landmark-based approach at the medial femoral epicondyle/adductor hiatus with 5 mL of 1% lidocaine preoperatively and 5 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine postoperatively. Neither ultrasound nor nerve stimulator was utilized to confirm the success of the block. The visual analog scale was utilized to record pain preoperatively and in the immediate postoperative period, one day, and seven to 10 days postoperatively. The nursing staff in the post-anesthesia care unit monitored patient pain levels and provided pain medication accordingly.

Results

We enrolled 80 patients, with 40 patients in each group. There was no difference in age, sex, body mass index, or laterality between study groups. Overall, there were no differences between groups in preoperative or postoperative pain at any time. The average pain scores preoperatively were 2.78 in the experimental group and 3.05 in the control group (p=0.502). In the immediate postoperative period, pain scores were 1.57 for the experimental group and 2.66 for the control group (p=0.090). No statistically significant difference was detected in the number of patients requiring opioids postoperatively or in the morphine milligram equivalents (MME) provided to patients receiving opioids. Twelve patients in the experimental group received opioids in the immediate postoperative period while 18 patients in the control group received opioids (p=0.248). We observed no adverse events in patients from either group.

Conclusion

As a pure sensory nerve, the saphenous nerve is an excellent target for pain control without associated leg weakness. We utilized a low-resource SNB in knee arthroscopy for partial meniscectomy and meniscus repair as an adjunct therapy for postoperative pain control. This randomized controlled trial suggests that surgeon-performed blocks via a landmark-based approach are not effective in controlling pain or limiting opioid use in the immediate postoperative period. However, given our lack of confirmatory testing via ultrasound or nerve stimulation, a true nerve block may not have been achieved in all patients. We believe this adds to the external validity of this study, as these tools may not be readily available in all settings.

Safety and Efficacy of Postoperative Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in Sports Medicine

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for multimodal pain control after surgery. These medications work by selective or nonselective inhibition of cyclooxygenase, which has downstream effects on thromboxanes, prostaglandins, and prostacyclins. Clinical studies have shown beneficial effects for alleviating pain and reducing opioid consumption after surgery. Within hip arthroscopy, there is evidence that postoperative NSAIDs can also reduce the risk of symptomatic heterotopic bone formation. However, preclinical and animal studies have raised concern over the effect of NSAIDs on bone and soft-tissue healing. In addition, selective and nonselective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors may have different safety profiles regarding postoperative soft-tissue healing. The purpose of this review was to outline the mechanisms of action, efficacy, and effect on soft-tissue healing of postoperative NSAIDs and to provide evidence-based recommendations for appropriate use.

Preoperative pain sensitivity questionnaire helps customize pain management after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate correlations between preoperative pain sensitivity and postoperative analgesic consumption together with pain perception shortly after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in non-arthritic knees.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients who underwent primary arthroscopic meniscectomy were prospectively divided into three postoperative treatment groups that were prescribed with betamethasone injection (at the end of surgery), oral celecoxib or rescue analgesia (control). Preoperative pain sensitivity was evaluated by pain sensitivity questionnaires (PSQ). Patients were followed for the first three postoperative weeks to evaluate knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) pain scores and analgesics consumption. Statistical analysis included correlations among preoperative pain sensitivity, postoperative pain levels and analgesics consumption. A receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to investigate the cutoff values of the PSQ score to predict insufficient postoperative pain reduction.

RESULTS

There were no differences at baseline among all study groups in age, sex, BMI, level of activity, comorbidities and surgical findings. At the final follow-up, KOOS pain scores improved in all groups (p < 0.001). Mean final KOOS pain scores were 76.1 ± 15.2 for the betamethasone group, 70.8 ± 12.6 for the celecoxib group and 78.7 ± 11.6 for the control group. No differences in scores were observed among groups (n.s.). In the control group, a negative correlation was observed between PSQ score and KOOS-pain scores at the end of the follow-up in addition to a positive correlation between PSQ score and rescue analgesia consumption at the first postoperative week. The optimal cutoff value for PSQ score to predict insufficient improvement in KOOS-pain subscale was 5.0 points.

CONCLUSIONS

A cutoff value of pain sensitivity questionnaire score above 5.0 points was determined to identify patients with higher sensitivity to pain who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. These patients reported relatively increased pain and consumed more rescue analgesics postoperatively unless treated with a single intraoperative corticosteroids injection or oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatories. Therefore, surgeons can use pain sensitivity questionnaire score as a preoperative tool to identify patients with high sensitivity to pain and customize their postoperative analgesics protocol to better fit their pain levels.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Patient-reported opioid analgesic use after discharge from surgical procedures: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review synthesizes evidence on patient-reported outpatient opioid analgesic use post-surgery.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed (February 2019), Web of Science and Embase (June 2019) for U.S. studies describing patient-reported outpatient opioid analgesic use. Two reviewers extracted data on opioid analgesic use, standardized use, and performed independent quality appraisals based on the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Ninety-six studies met eligibility criteria; 56 had sufficient information to standardize use in oxycodone 5 mg tablets. Patient-reported opioid analgesic use varied widely by procedure type; knee and hip arthroplasty had the highest postoperative opioid use, and use after many procedures was reported as < 5 tablets. In studies that examined excess tablets, 25%-98% of the total tablets prescribed were reported to be excess, with most studies reporting that 50%-70% of tablets went unused. Factors commonly associated with higher opioid analgesic use included preoperative opioid analgesic use, higher inpatient opioid analgesic use, higher postoperative pain scores, and chronic medical conditions, among others. Estimates also varied across studies due to heterogeneity in study design, including length of follow-up and inclusion/exclusion criteria.

CONCLUSION

Self-reported post-surgery outpatient opioid analgesic use varies widely both across procedures and within a given procedure type. Contributors to within-procedure variation included patient characteristics, prior opioid use, intraoperative and perioperative factors, and differences in timing of opioid use data collection. We provide recommendations to help minimize variation caused by study design factors and maximize interpretability of forthcoming studies for use in clinical guidelines and decision-making.

Oxycodone-paracetamol tablet exhibits increased analgesic efficacy for acute postoperative pain, higher satisfaction and comparable safety profiles compared with celecoxib in patients underwent arthroscopic knee surgery

This randomized, controlled study compared the efficacy and safety between oxycodone-paracetamol tablet and celecoxib for postoperative analgesia in patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgery (AKS). Totally, 232 patients scheduled to undergo AKS were enrolled and were randomly assigned to either the oxycodone-paracetamol (OPT group) or the celecoxib group (CEL group). Pain at rest/motion (based on pain visual analog scale (VAS) score), rescue analgesia consumption, satisfaction level and adverse events were assessed after AKS. Pain VAS score at rest was decreased at 6 h, 12 h post-AKS in the OPT group compared with the CEL group. Similarly, pain VAS score at motion was reduced at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h post-AKS in the OPT group compared to the CEL group. Furthermore, both rescue analgesia rate (14.7% vs. 33.6%) and accumulated pethidine consumption (3.7 ± 8.9 mg vs. 14.0 ± 21.2 mg) were lower in OPT group compared with the CEL group. Patients satisfaction score was either at 24 h, 48 h in OPT group compared with the CEL group. Further subgroup analyses indicated that the effect of oxycodone-paracetamol versus (vs. celecoxib) on post-AKS management was more apparent in the elderly patients and male patients. In addition, the adverse events were well tolerable (including nausea, constipation, vomiting, drowsiness and dizziness) and were of no different between the two groups. In conclusion, oxycodone-paracetamol tablet presents increased analgesic efficacy for acute postoperative pain, with higher patient satisfaction and comparable safety profiles compared with celecoxib in patients underwent AKS.

Multimodal Nonopioid Pain Protocol Provides Equivalent Pain Versus Opioid Control Following Meniscus Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of a nonopioid pain regimen in controlling postoperative pain as compared with a traditional opioid pain control following primary meniscectomy or meniscal repair.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients undergoing primary meniscectomy or meniscal repair were assessed for participation. A prospective randomized control trial was performed in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 statement. The 2 arms of the study included a multimodal nonopioid analgesic protocol and a standard opioid regimen with a primary outcome of postoperative pain level (visual analog scale) for the first 10 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction. Randomization was achieved using a random-number generator. Patients were not blinded. Data collection was done by a blinded observer.

RESULTS

Eleven patients did not meet the inclusion criteria, and 27 declined participation. A total of 61 patients were analyzed with 30 randomized to the opioid regimen and 31 randomized to the nonopioid regimen. Patients receiving the nonopioid regimen demonstrated noninferior visual analog scale scores compared with patients who received opioid pain medication (P > .05). No significant differences were found in preoperative (opioid: 58.9 ± 7.0; nonopioid: 58.2 ± 5.5, P = .724) or postoperative (opioid: 59.8 ± 6.5; nonopioid: 54.9 ± 7.1, P = .064) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement and Information System Pain Interference Short Form scores. No difference was found in recorded side effects between both groups at any given time point: constipation, nausea, diarrhea, upset stomach, and drowsiness (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that a multimodal nonopioid pain protocol provided equivalent pain control and patient outcomes following primary meniscus surgery while having an equivalent side effect profile. All patients reported satisfaction with their pain management without requiring emergency opioid analgesia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, prospective randomized controlled trial.

Perioperative nonopioid analgesia reduces postoperative opioid consumption in knee arthroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The opioid epidemic has prompted an emphasis on investigating opioid-sparing alternatives for pain management following knee arthroscopy. This review evaluated the effects of perioperative nonopioid adjunct analgesia on postoperative opioid consumption and pain control in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS. Prospective comparative studies assessing the efficacy of various perioperative nonopioid analgesic strategies in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy were included. Twenty-five studies (n = 2408) were included.

RESULTS

Pre-emptive nonopioid pain medications demonstrated a reduction in cumulative postoperative oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption by 11.8 mg (95% CI - 18.3, - 5.4, p ≤ 0.0001) and VAS pain scores by 1.5 (95% CI - 2.3, - 0.7, p < 0.001) at 24 h compared to placebo. Postoperative nonopioid pain medications significantly reduced cumulative postoperative OME consumption by 9.7 mg (95% CI - 14.4, - 5.1, p < 0.001) and VAS pain scores by 1.0 (95% CI - 1.354, - 0.633, p < 0.001) at 24 h compared to placebo. Saphenous nerve blocks significantly reduced cumulative postoperative OME consumption by 6.5 mg (95% CI - 10.3, - 2.6, p = 0.01) and VAS pain scores by 0.8 (- 1.4, - 0.3, p = 0.03) at 24 h compared to placebo. Both preoperative patient education and postoperative cryotherapy reduced postoperative opioid consumption.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative nonopioid pharmacotherapy, saphenous nerve blocks, and cryotherapy for patients undergoing knee arthroscopy significantly reduce opioid consumption and pain scores when compared to placebo at 24 h postoperatively. These interventions should be considered in efforts to reduce opioid consumption in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. More research is needed to determine which interventions can reduce pain outside of the immediate postoperative period and the potential synergistic effects of combining interventions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Efficacy of Anti-inflammatory Treatment Versus Rescue Analgesia After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy in Nonarthritic Knees: A 3-Arm Controlled Study

Background

There is currently no consensus regarding the appropriate treatment for postoperative pain after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM). Prescribing a mild non-anti-inflammatory protocol of rescue analgesia may be sufficient to avoid the side effects of opioids or anti-inflammatories.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose was to compare the efficacy of pain reduction after APM in nonarthritic knees using betamethasone or celecoxib as anti-inflammatory analgesics versus acetaminophen or tramadol as rescue analgesics. The hypothesis was that there is no advantage for anti-inflammatories in achieving postoperative immediate pain relief after APM in nonarthritic knees compared with a simple nonopioid treatment.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

This 3-arm controlled study evaluated postoperative pain levels and analgesic consumption in patients who underwent primary APM (under general anesthesia) at a single institution from December 2018 to December 2019. Patients were prospectively divided into 3 treatment groups: (1) betamethasone injection at the end of the procedure, (2) oral celecoxib prescription, or (3) neither treatment (control). All groups were instructed to take supplementary acetaminophen as needed. Patients were also allowed to take tramadol as needed to evaluate the need for opioids. At postoperative weeks 1, 2, and 3, patients completed the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain subscale, and results were compared between time points and groups.

Results

A total of 99 patients were included in the treatment groups: betamethasone group (32 patients), celecoxib group (30 patients), and control group (37 patients). At baseline, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in age, sex, body mass index, level of activity, comorbidities, or surgical findings. KOOS Pain scores improved at every time point for all 3 groups (P < .001), and no differences in scores were observed among groups. The consumption of acetaminophen or tramadol as rescue analgesia throughout the follow-up period was negligible among groups.

Conclusion

During the first 3 postoperative weeks after APM in nonarthritic knees, pain was efficiently controlled by betamethasone or celecoxib; however, pain was also efficiently controlled by minimal consumption of acetaminophen with negligible use of tramadol. Therefore, acetaminophen could be prescribed as an effective first-line postoperative analgesic after APM.

Reduced opioid prescribing following arthroscopic meniscectomy does not negatively impact patient satisfaction

BACKGROUND

Prior research has demonstrated that physician desire to optimize patient satisfaction is a cause of over-prescription of opioid medications in the healthcare setting. The purpose of this study was to investigate what effect, if any, decreased opioid prescribing following arthroscopic meniscectomy had on Press-Ganey (PG) satisfaction survey scores.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively-collected data was conducted on patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy between October2014-October2019. Inclusion criteria consisted of complete PG information, no history of trauma, connective tissue disease, or prior knee surgery. Groups were separated based on date of surgery relative to implementation of an institutional opioid reduction policy which occurred on October 1, 2018. Prescriptions were converted to milligram-morphine-equivalents (MME) for direct comparison between opioids. Minimal-Detectable-Change (MDC) was calculated to evaluate clinical significance of any statistically significant findings.

RESULTS

554 patients were included in this analysis (452pre-protocol, 102post-protocol). The groups did not differ statistically (p > 0.05) with respect to any patient demographics (age, BMI, sex, prior opioid use, opioid naivete) with the exception of smoking history; 54.4% in the pre-protocol group and 32.4%in the post-protocol group; p < 0.001. Mean discharge dose for the pre-protocol group was 229.3 ± 141MME, and 80.05 ± 82.7MME post-protocol; P < 0.0001. There were no statistically significant differences between pre-and-post-protocol satisfaction with pain control scores; P = 0.15. The differences between satisfaction with pain control did not meet clinical or statistical significance, based on a calculated MDC = 0.368. Among pre-protocol patients, 372(82.3%) gave a "top box" response to the question "degree-to-which-your-pain-was-controlled", compared to 91(89.2%) from the post-protocol group; P = 0.10.

CONCLUSION

A reduction in opioids prescribed after arthroscopic meniscectomy was not associated with any difference in patient satisfaction with pain management, as measured by the Press-Ganey survey. LOE: 3.

Study protocol: randomized controlled trial of opioid-free vs. traditional perioperative analgesia in elective orthopedic surgery

BACKGROUND

The medical community is beginning to recognize the contribution of prescription opioids in the growing national opioid crisis. Many studies have compared the safety and efficacy of alternative analgesics to opioids, but none utilizing a completely opioid-free perioperative protocol in orthopedics.

METHODS

We developed and tested an opioid-free perioperative analgesic pathway (from preoperative to postoperative period) among patients undergoing common elective orthopedic procedures. Patients will be randomized to receive either traditional opioid-including or completely opioid-free perioperative medications. This study is being conducted across multiple orthopedic subspecialties in patients undergoing the following common elective orthopedic procedures: single-level or two-level ACDF/ACDA, 1st CMC arthroplasty, Hallux Valgus/Rigidus corrections, diagnostic knee arthroscopies, total hip arthroplasty (THA), and total shoulder arthroplasty/reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA/RTSA). The primary outcome measure is pain score at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures include pain scores at additional time points, medication side effects, and several patient-reported variables such as patient satisfaction, quality of life, and functional status.

DISCUSSION

We describe the methods for a feasibility randomized controlled trial comparing opioid-free perioperative analgesics to traditional opioid-including protocols. We present this study so that it may be replicated and incorporated into future studies at other institutions, as well as disseminated to additional orthopedic and/or non-orthopedic surgical procedures. The ultimate goal of presenting this protocol is to aid recent efforts in reducing the impact of prescription opioids on the national opioid crisis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol was approved by the local institutional review board and registered with clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04176783 ) on November 25, 2019, retrospectively registered.

Opioid Use Is Reduced in Patients Treated with NSAIDs After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Randomized Controlled Study

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as the primary postoperative pain medication compared with standard oral opioids after arthroscopic shoulder capsulolabral (Bankart) repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

Methods

This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study. Patients aged 18 to 65 years indicated for arthroscopic shoulder capsulolabral repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability were included. Postoperatively, patients were prescribed 1 of 2 analgesic regimens: (1) 30 ibuprofen (600 mg every 6 to 8 hours as needed) and 10 tablets of oxycodone/acetaminophen (5/325 mg every 6 hours as needed for breakthrough pain) or (2) 30 tablets oxycodone/acetaminophen (5/325 mg every 6 hours as needed). Subjects completed questionnaires at 24, 48, and 96 hours and 1 week after surgery, which included questions about analgesic medication usage, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, incidence of adverse events, and patient satisfaction.

Results

Between December 2017 and May 2019, 80 patients (mean age 31.3 ± 10.4 years) were enrolled. Overall there were no significant differences in VAS pain score or patient satisfaction between the 2 groups. Patients in the opioid-only group had a significantly higher mean opioid consumption on postoperative days (PODs) 2 to 4 (5.5 versus 2.9, P = .05) and after 1 week (11.7 versus 7.9 tablets, P = .05) compared with patients in the NSAID group. Of patients in the NSAID group, 17.5% experienced adverse effects, compared with 35% in the opioid-only group.

Conclusions

Use of oral NSAIDs with limited breakthrough opioids results in significantly less opioid use after arthroscopic Bankart repair in the first postoperative week compared with opioids only. Both groups used limited amounts of opioids to control postoperative pain. There were no differences in pain levels at any time point postoperatively or satisfaction between patient groups.

Level of Evidence

II, nonblinded randomized control trial.

Editorial Commentary: Uncle Sam Wants YOU! (to Stop the Opioid Crisis)

Over the past few years, the opioid epidemic has become a major battle ground for physicians on a national scale. Rates of death from overdose are rising, and recent cries to mitigate the issue have been met with an onslaught of high-quality research and protocols, both to reduce postoperative pain and to minimize the amounts of narcotics that patients and their loved ones have access to. Physician practice patterns, multimodal pain management, and patient education, as well as the feasibility of standardized postoperative pain regimens for particular procedures, have become components of a multipronged approach for rapid improvement of the current environment. This pervasive crisis begs the question: What role, if any, should the government play in setting rules and regulations for postoperative patients? And if the government intervenes, will the result be effective?

Opioid-Limiting Regulation: Effect on Patients Undergoing Knee and Shoulder Arthroscopy

PURPOSE

To determine the effect prescription-limiting legislation passed in Rhode Island has had on opioids prescribed following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery at various time points, up to 90 days postoperatively.

METHODS

All patients undergoing the 3 most common arthroscopic procedures at our institution (anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, partial meniscectomy, and rotator cuff repair) were included. Patients were selected from 2 6-month study periods (prepassage and postimplementation of the law). The state's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program database was queried for controlled substances filled in the perioperative period (from 30 days preoperatively to 90 days postoperatively). Multiple logistic regressions were used to identify predictors of chronic (>30 days) opioid use.

RESULTS

The morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed in the initial postoperative script decreased from 319.04 (∼43 5-mg oxycodone tablets) in the prepassage to 152.45 MMEs (∼20 5-mg oxycodone tablets) in the postimplementation group (P < .001). The total MMEs filled in the first 30 days decreased from 520.93 to 299.94 MMEs (∼70 to ∼40 5-mg oxycodone tablets) (P < .001). MMEs filled between 30 and 90 days fell by 22.5% for all patients in this study; however, this change was not statistically significant (P = .263). Preoperative opioid use (odds ratio, 10.85; P < .001) and preoperative benzodiazepine use (odds ratio, 2.13; P = .005) predicted chronic opioid use postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

State opioid-limiting legislation reduced cumulative MMEs following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery in the first 30 days. Further research assessing the impact of this legislation on postoperative pain control, patient satisfaction, and functional outcomes following surgery is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

Opioid Use After Knee Arthroscopy

Purpose

To quantify the use of 5 mg oxycodone by patients who have undergone knee arthroscopy.

Methods

Patients who underwent knee arthroscopy at 2 institutions between May 2018 and May 2019 were identified retrospectively. Patients were called and queried about the following metrics: total postoperative opioid consumption, preoperative opioid consumption (defined as within 3 months of surgery), smoking status, and history of depression. The total number of opioids prescribed and number of refills were determined according to each patient’s chart. State databases were reviewed for additional opioid prescriptions.

Results

A total of 100 patients were included in this study. Patients were prescribed a median of 5 pills (range, 5 to 40). Median postoperative opioid consumption was 0 pills, with a mean of 1.9 pills (14.3 oral morphine equivalents) and a range of 0 to 25 pills of oxycodone 5 mg. Of the patients, 97% did not obtain refills, and 58% of the patients did not consume any opioids. Overall, 90% of all patients consumed ≤ 5 pills.

Conclusions

Of the patients, 90% o consumed 5 or fewer opioid pills (oxycodone 5 mg) following knee arthroscopy, with more than half of the patients consuming 0 pills. As a result, we recommend that 5 oxycodone 5 mg pills serve as an objective guideline for opioid prescription following knee arthroscopy.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Preoperative Patient Education May Decrease Postoperative Opioid Use After Meniscectomy

Purpose

To identify the current opioid prescribing and use practices after arthroscopic meniscectomy and to evaluate the role of preoperative patient education in decreasing postoperative opioid consumption.

Methods

Patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy were prospectively identified for inclusion. They were placed into 1 of 2 groups: Group 1 received no education regarding opioid use after surgery, whereas group 2 received a standardized overview on postoperative opioid use. Patients were assigned to the groups consecutively: Patients treated at the beginning of the study were assigned to group 1, and patients treated at the end of the study were assigned to group 2. Data from group 1 were used to identify "normal" opioid prescribing and use practices and to guide patients in group 2 regarding normal postoperative opioid use. Patients were surveyed weekly for 4 weeks after surgery to determine the number of opioids taken. Postoperative opioid consumption was analyzed and compared between the 2 groups.

Results

A total of 62 patients completed the study (32 in group 1 and 30 in group 2). Patients in group 1 were prescribed an average of 42.0 opioid pills (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.0-51.0 pills) and used an average of 15.84 pills (95% CI, 9.26-22.4 pills) after surgery, whereas patients in group 2 used an average of 4.00 pills (95% CI, 2.12-5.88 pills) after surgery. Patients in group 2 used 11.84 fewer opioid pills (P = .001), a 296% decrease in postoperative opioid consumption. The number of patients who continued to take opioid pills 4 weeks after surgery was 7 patients (21.9%) in group 1 and 1 patient (3.3%) in group 2.

Conclusions

Preoperative patient education regarding opioids may decrease postoperative opioid consumption and the duration for which patients take opioid pills after arthroscopic meniscectomy.

Level of Evidence

Level II, prospective comparative study.

What You Don't Know Until It's Too Late! Arthroscopy Podcasts Could Change Your Practice

Podcasts provide a follow-up on articles from Arthroscopy, Arthroscopy Techniques, and Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation. Readers could learn a great deal by interviewing the authors of scientific studies, and Podcasters do exactly that.

Opioids After Arthroscopy: We're Only Halfway Through the Crisis

The orthopaedic community and the general medical community have made progress in the quest to control opioid abuse, but perhaps we are only halfway there. Ample literature has defined the crisis, and governmental guidelines have attempted to curb overprescribing. The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery now emphasizes the importance of continuing education on the issue, and the arthroscopic and related surgical literature shows the deleterious effect of preoperative narcotic consumption and the opportunity to achieve positive outcomes while limiting postoperative opioid prescriptions. A comprehensive solution requires identifying the problem, considering multimodal anesthesia, avoiding overprescribing, acknowledging that minimizing opioid use is not equivalent to undertreating pain, minimizing preoperative opioid use, managing patient expectations, and continuing to investigate the outcomes of pain management while limiting opioid prescriptions or forgoing opioids altogether.

Editorial Commentary: Houston, We Have a Problem! A Really Big Opioid Problem!

The opioid crisis is real, and orthopaedic surgeons are at the top of the list of overall opioid prescribers. As orthopaedic surgeons, we need to realize the broad spectrum of the problem, take ownership of our faults, and identify how each of us can individually put processes into our own practices to help find a solution to the problem.