A Biomechanical Comparison of Alternative Graft Preparations for All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes between All-inside and Standard Technique in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with 6-strand Hamstring Tendon Autograft

OBJECTIVE

All-inside and standard techniques with 4-strand hamstrings graft have been widely used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the graft diameter of less than 8 mm will significantly increase the rate of surgical failure, and the 6-strand graft can solve this problem. The purpose of this study is to compare all-inside ACL reconstruction using suspensory cortical button fixation on both tibia and femur with standard ACL reconstruction using suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw with a 6-strand hamstring tendon autograft in postoperative clinical outcomes.

METHODS

From January 2020 to December 2020, 48 patients performed ACL reconstruction were divided into the all-side group and the standard group according to the different surgical techniques. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subjective function scores was used to assess clinical outcomes at least 24 months following ACL reconstruction. MRI was used to measure the value of bone tunnel widening in articular and middle portions. Subjective function scores included the Lysholm knee score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, the Knee Society Score (KSS) for pain and function, and KT-1000. The t-test was used assuming the distribution of the patients which follows the normal distribution and we used non-parametric tests if these two conditions were not satisfied.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, there were 22 patients in the all-inside group and 24 patients in the standard group. No significant differences were found with respect to femoral tunnel widening and subjective function scores. However, a significant increase in tibial tunnel widening was found in the middle portion of the standard group (2.25 ± 0.74) compared to the all-inside group (0.76 ± 0.24) (p < 0.01) and also in the articular portion of the standard group (2.07 ± 0.77) compared to the all-inside group (1.52 ± 0.54) (p = 0.02). In addition, the value of the KT-1000 was 1.81 ± 0.45 for the all-inside group and 2.12 ± 0.44 in the standard group (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The objective stability of the knee was relatively better in the all-inside group than in the standard group. And tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction was significantly greater in the standard technique when compared to the all-inside technique on the tibia side.

All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Had Clinical Outcome Similar to the Transtibial Technique Except for Improved Side-to-Side Difference and Tegner Activity Scale: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes of the all-inside technique with the transtibial technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on available literature on this topic.

METHODS

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist, we conducted a systematic search for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Our comprehensive search encompassed PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that compared the 2 techniques with a minimal 1-year follow-up. Two independent authors assessed RCTs using the risk of bias tool developed by the Cochrane Collaboration and evaluated the quality of cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomized Comparative Trials. The subjective and objective outcomes, complications, and graft failure were obtained. R software was used to perform the analysis.

RESULTS

The present analysis enrolled 9 RCTs (n = 687) and 11 cohort studies (n = 910). After a minimal 1-year follow-up in RCTs, functional outcomes such as International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, Knee Society Score, and hop test were found to be similar between 2 techniques. The laxity outcomes, including the IKDC objective grade and pivot-shift test, were suggested to be comparable. There was a significant difference favoring the transtibial technique in terms of side-to-side difference (P = .04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.90). The pooled data from cohort studies indicated equivalent results in terms of IKDC subjective score, Lysholm score, side-to-side difference, IKDC objective grade, complications, and graft failure, with the exception of statistical difference in the Tegner activity scale (P = .03; 95% CI, -0.50 to -0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that there is no difference in most outcome scores between the all-inside and transtibial techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. There are statistically significant differences in side-to-side difference and Tegner activity scale favoring the all-inside technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, meta-analysis of Level I to IV studies.

Clinical Applications of PRP: Musculoskeletal Applications, Current Practices and Update

Musculoskeletal tissues are often subjected to deleterious effects stemming from traumatic injuries or degenerative pathologies, which can impede the body's natural repair response. The advent of regenerative medicine has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach in modern patient care. Among the interventions in this cutting-edge field, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and cell-based therapies, such as mesenchymal stem cells, have garnered significant attention. In this article, we endeavor to provide an overview of the current practices and recent developments in PRP therapy, with a particular emphasis on the clinical applications for musculoskeletal pathologies.

Short graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Current concepts

Short graft anterior cruciate igament reconstruction is increasing in popularity for performing a primary ACLR. The short graft coupled with the all-inside technique using closed sockets and suspensory fixation at both femoral and tibial ends are its defining features. The outcomes of this technique have been comparable to well established transportal ACLR techniques. It has the benefits of preserved hamstring strength and less pain attributed to transtibial drilling. However, there is a learning curve involved and will require time before mastery of the technique. Furthermore, in combined osteotomy or multiligament surgery, the use of short graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with sockets preserve bone stock and the single tendon harvest spares the other tendons for use in other ligament reconstruction.

Predicting the Effect of Localized ACL Damage on Neighbor Ligament Mechanics via Finite Element Modeling

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) plays a pivotal role in support of the knee under loading. When damaged, it is known that substantial changes in the mechanics of the neighboring ligaments can be observed. However, a localized damage approach to investigating how ACL deficiency influences the neighboring ligaments has not been carried out. To do this, a finite element model, incorporating a continuum damage material model of the ACL, was implemented. Localized ACL damage was induced using high quadriceps force loading. Once damaged, anterior shear forces or tibial torque loadings were applied to the knee joint. The relative changes in stress contour and average mid-substance stress were examined for each of the neighboring ligaments following localized ACL damage. It was observed that localized ACL damage could produce notable changes in the mechanics of the neighboring knee ligaments, with non-homogenous stress contour shape changes and average stress magnitude being observed to increase in most cases, with a notable exception occurring in the MCL for both loading modes. In addition, the ligament bearing the most loading also changed with ACL deficiency. These changes carry implications as to morphological effects that may be induced following localized ACL damage, indicating that early diagnosis of ACL injury may be helpful in mitigating other complications post injury.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictive Model Determines Hamstring Autograft Size for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Under 18 Years Old

Purpose

To evaluate the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging in determining hamstring autograft size preoperatively for pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Methods

We conducted an analysis of patients younger than 18 years who underwent quadrupled hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Semitendinosus tendon (ST) and gracilis tendon (GT) cross-sectional areas were measured on preoperative knee magnetic resonance imaging scans. Height, weight, body mass index, and sex were analyzed using ordinal regression analysis. A classification and regression tree (CART) was constructed to identify predictors of the predetermined intraoperative graft size of 8 mm or greater. Sensitivity and specificity were determined based on specified predictors.

Results

This study included 102 patients (52 female and 50 male patients). The average age was 15.8 ± 1.4 years. At the time of surgery, 38 patients (37.3%) had open physes, with an average age of 13.4 ± 0.96 years. Of the 102 patients, 55 (53.9%) had 8-mm or larger grafts, 31 (30.4%) had 7.5-mm grafts, and 16 (15.7%) had 7-mm or smaller grafts. In 12 patients (31.6%) with open physes, the graft size was less than 8 mm. Male patients were more likely to have 8-mm or larger grafts (P < .001), as were patients with a greater height (170.1 ± 7.3 cm vs 161.1 ± 12.0 cm, P = .013) and those with a greater weight (79.7 ± 23.4 kg vs 57.1 ± 16.2 kg, P = .005). For all patients, predictive modeling determined that if the cross-sectional areas of the ST and GT were 31.2 mm² or greater, then 87.5% of patients would have a graft size of 8 mm or greater with an 80% sensitivity and 74% specificity. Similarly, if the cross-sectional areas of the ST and GT were 31.4 mm² or greater in patients with open physes, then 100% of patients would have a graft size of 8 mm or greater with a 46% sensitivity and 99% specificity.

Conclusions

A preoperative summation of the cross-sectional areas of the ST and GT greater than 31 mm² in patients younger than 18 years with open or closed physes can help the surgeon preoperatively predict which patients will have an intraoperative graft size of 8 mm or greater. The risk factors for a smaller graft size include female sex, a shorter height, and a lighter weight.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Prediction of Autograft Hamstring Size for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using MRI

BACKGROUND

Hamstring autografts with a diameter of less than 8 mm for ACL reconstruction have an increased risk of failure, but there is no consensus regarding the best method to predict autograft size in ACL reconstruction.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the relationship between hamstring cross-section on preoperative MRI and intraoperative autograft size? (2) What is the minimum hamstring tendon cross-sectional area on MRI needed to produce an autograft of at least 8 mm at its thickest point?

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 68 patients. We collectively reviewed patients who underwent ACL reconstruction by three separate fellowship-trained surgeons at the Carilion Clinic between April 2010 and July 2013. We searched the patient records database of each surgeon using the keyword "ACL". A total of 293 ACL reconstructions were performed during that time period. Of those, 23% (68 patients) had their preoperative MRI (1.5 T or 3 T magnet) performed at the Carilion Clinic with MRI confirmation of acute total ACL rupture. Exclusion criteria included previous ACL reconstructions, multiligamentous injuries, and history of acute hamstring injuries.After applying the exclusion criteria, there were 29 patients in the 1.5 T magnet group and 39 in the 3 T group. Median age (range) was 29 years (12 to 50) for the 1.5 T group and 19 years (9 to 43) for the 3 T group. The patients were 41% female in the 1.5 T group and 23% female in the 3 T group. Use of 1.5 T or 3 T magnets was based on clinical availability and scheduling. The graft's preoperative cross-sectional area was compared with the intraoperative graft's diameter. The MRI measurements were performed by a single musculoskeletal radiologist at the widest point of the medial femoral condyle and at the joint line. Intraoperative measurements were performed by recording the smallest hole the graft could fit through at its widest point. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the relationship between graft size and tendon cross-sectional area. A simple logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the cutoff cross-sectional areas needed for a graft measuring at least 8 mm at its thickest point. Intrarater reliability was evaluated based on re-measurement of 19 tendons, which produced an overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.96 95% (CI 0.93 to 0.98). A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

In general, the correlation between MRI-measured hamstring thickness and hamstring graft thickness as measured in the operating room were good but not excellent. The three measurements that demonstrated the strongest correlation with graft size in the 1.5 T group were the semitendinosus at the medial femoral condyle (r = 0.69; p < 0.001), the semitendinosus and gracilis at the medial femoral condyle (r = 0.70; p < 0.001), and the mean semitendinosus and gracilis (r = 0.64; p < 0.001). These three measurements had correlation values of 0.53, 0.56, and 0.56, respectively, in the 3 T MRI group (all p values < 0.001). To create an 8-mm hamstring autograft, the mean semitendinosus plus gracilis cutoff values areas were 18.8 mm and 17.5 mm for the 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging performed according to routine knee injury protocol can be used to preoperatively predict the size of hamstring autografts for ACL reconstructions. In clinical practice, this can assist orthopaedic surgeons in graft selection and surgical planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study.

Editorial Commentary: My Harvested Hamstring Autograft Is Too Small. Now What?

A harvested hamstring autograft that is too small is a technical challenge for an effective anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. One potential solution is to assemble the graft differently to maximize the diameter and length of the graft. Compared with the traditional, all-inside, 4-strand graft preparation, alternative graft constructs could be further explored and evaluated.