Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes and Second-Look Arthroscopic Findings After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Fixed and Adjustable Loop Cortical Suspension Devices

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using an endobutton device: A narrative review

Since the recognition of MPFL as the primary soft-tissue restraint to lateral displacement of the patella, its reconstruction gained popularity either alone or in combination with other procedures. Today, although there are plenty of techniques described in the literature, there is no consensus regarding which one is better. MPFL reconstruction using an endobutton device has been proved to be a reliable option with satisfying clinical results. Single or dual tunnel can be done depending on surgeon's preference. For safer outcomes more randomized controlled trials should be done while authors should be more meticulous when it comes to surgical technique.

Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Decreases Passive Anterior Tibial Subluxation Compared With Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Despite Similar Rotational Stability and Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

To analyze the effect of augmenting a hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with an anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) on a primary outcome of passive anterior tibial subluxation (PATS) and a secondary outcome of the clinical outcomes.

METHODS

ACL-injured patients who underwent primary ACLR between March 2014 and February 2020 at our center were enrolled. Patients who underwent combined procedures (ACLR + ALLR) were matched in a 1:1 propensity ratio to patients who underwent ACLR only. We evaluated PATS, knee stability (side-to-side laxity difference, pivot-shift test), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after the procedure and documented complications.

RESULTS

From an initial cohort of 252 patients with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years (48.4 ± 16.6 months), 35 matched pairs were included, and 17 patients (48.6%) in each group underwent second-look arthroscopy. The combined ACLR + ALLR group showed significantly better improvement of PATS in the lateral compartments than the isolated ACLR group (P = .034). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding knee stability (side-to-side laxity difference, pivot-shift test), PROMs, complications, and second-look arthroscopic findings (all P > .05). Moreover, the proportions of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference in PROMs were not different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined ACLR + ALLR procedure was associated with a mean improvement in anterior tibial subluxation for the lateral compartment that was 1.2 mm better than an isolated ACLR procedure, despite its lack of clinical significance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, cohort study.

Both Adjustable and Fixed Loop Hamstring Tendon Graft Fixation Have Similar Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Purpose

This study aims to compare the outcomes of fixed-loop device (FLD) vs adjustable-loop device (ALD) graft fixation with up to 2-year follow-up in patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in a predominantly Asian setting.

Methods

Prospectively collected outcome measures as well as clinical records of patients who underwent primary ACLR using either FLD or ALD fixation of hamstring tendon autograft performed by a single surgeon were reviewed. The surgeon in this study used a fixed-loop device from 2018 to 2019 and then changed to adjustable loop from 2019 to 2020. Suspensory fixation was performed on the femoral side, and aperture (interference screw) fixation was performed on the tibial side. Outcome measures included knee range of motion, KT-1000 arthrometer testing, Lysholm knee score, and Tegner activity scale. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at regular intervals of 6, 12, and 24 months.

Results

A total of 105 patients were identified. Forty-six were excluded due to incomplete follow-up data, so 59 patients with full 2-year follow-up were included in the final study group. Both groups (FLD vs ALD) were similar in demographics except for age (P = .042). Out of 105, there were 59 patients remaining in the study group with 2-year follow-up data. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups at all respective testing intervals.

Conclusions

FLDs and ALDs for suspensory fixation of hamstring tendon autograft in ACLR had similar clinical outcomes with a minimum of 2-year follow up. There is no evidence of graft loosening from loop lengthening.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative trial.

Adjustable Cortical Fixation Repair Is a Safe and Effective Technique for Quadriceps Tendon Rupture

Purpose

To report the clinical outcomes of quadriceps tendon repair using adjustable cortical fixation devices at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Methods

A retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent quadriceps tendon repair using adjustable cortical fixation devices between January 2017 and March 2020. Patients with a partial tendon rupture were excluded. Demographic and injury-specific variables were gathered preoperatively and postoperatively from the electronic medical record and patient-reported outcomes (Lysholm Knee Questionnaire, Lower Extremity Functional Scale, and SF-12) were collected via telephone at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively.

Results

Fourteen quadriceps tendon repairs were included in a total of 13 patients. The average time to follow-up was 3.5 ± 1.2 years with a range of 1.9 to 5.7 years. The mean age of this cohort was 55.7 ± 11.6 years, and the mean body mass index was 32.9 ± 6.0. Ten injuries (71.4%) were sustained by mechanical fall, 2 patients (14.3%) suffered a direct blow to the knee, and 2 patients (14.3%) reported a noncontact injury mechanism. Thirteen quadriceps ruptures (13/14, 92.9%) underwent surgery within 10 days of their injury. One knee (7.1%) had a postoperative extensor lag of 5°, whereas another knee (7.1%) required a reoperation for manipulation under anesthesia and arthroscopic lysis of adhesions at 3 months' postoperatively. None of the included patients (0.0%) developed a tendon re-rupture, venous thromboembolism, delayed wound healing, surgical-site infection, neuropraxia or nerve injury, hardware irritation, patella fracture, or heterotopic ossification.

Conclusions

In this study, adjustable cortical fixation was a safe and effective surgical technique for quadriceps tendon repair, with adequate restoration of quadriceps function and a low rate of adverse events at 2 years postoperatively.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Clinical outcomes of three different techniques using adjustable-loop fixation in arthroscopic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Adjustable femoral suspensory fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) become popular in recent years. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of three different techniques using an adjustable-loop fixation in ACRL.

METHODS

This study included 38 patients who underwent ACLR using the adjustable-loop device for femoral fixation between January 2018 and November 2021. All the participants were randomly assigned to a standard (group 1), retensioning (group 2), retensioning and knot tying (group 3). Clinical outcome parametres included Tegner - Lysholm Score, IKDC score, KT-1000 displacement and isokinetic muscle function tests.

RESULTS

Overall, 38 patients (group 1: n = 13 [mean ± SD age, 30.1 ± 9.40 years]; group 2: n = 12 [mean ± SD age, 24.5 ± 7.79 years]; group 3 = 13 [mean ± SD age, 27.8 ± 6.59 years]) were included in the final analysis. The follow-up period was 9.7 ± 1.2; 9.5 ± 1.7 and 10 ± 1.5 months for groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively. From preoperatively to postoperatively, the mean Tegner-Lysholm scores improved significantly in all three groups (group 1: from 63.5 to 95.6; group 2: from 61.58 to 98.5; group 3: from 66.6 to 95.9, P < 0.0001 for all), as did the mean IKDC score (group 1: 53.9-88.8; group 2: 61.3-94.9; group 3: 60.7-94.6 (P < 0.0001 for all).

CONCLUSION

The retensioning with or without knot-tying method is believed to increase stability in graft fixation. However, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes in each technique.

Additional tying on the adjustable-loop device improves the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to verify the efficacy of a novel technique for additional tying on the adjustable-loop device to prevent stress concentration on the graft loop end and gradual loop lengthening.

METHODS

A total of 124 patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts from 2014 to 2017 were included in this retrospective study. After 1:1 propensity score matching, two groups were formed (group I: 50 patients without tying vs. group II: 50 patients with tying). Anterior laxity was evaluated using side-to-side differences. Tunnel length, loop length, and graft-tunnel gap were measured using follow-up magnetic resonance imaging. The signal-to-noise ratio was calculated at the loop end, loop inner side, tunnel entrance, and graft mid-substance. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, pivot shift test, and Lachman test.

RESULTS

The average follow-up period was 63.2 ± 4.8 and 53.8 ± 11.9 months in groups I and II, respectively. Anterior laxity showed that side-to-side differences improved significantly 6 months postoperatively in both the groups. Although the anterior laxity improved in group II (2.9 ± 1.0 to 1.6 ± 0.8, p < 0.001), it deteriorated in group I (2.5 ± 1.5 to 3.3 ± 1.3 mm, p < 0.001) at the final follow-up. The graft-tunnel gap was significantly larger in group I (p < 0.001). The signal-to-noise ratios of the loop end and loop inner side were significantly higher in group I (p < 0.001 and p = 0.020, respectively). The clinical outcomes at the final follow-up were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The additional tying on the adjustable-loop device was not superior to the control group in clinical stability examination or outcome. However, it was effective in anterior laxity measured by stress radiographs, preventing stress on the adjustable-loop device, and gradual graft loop lengthening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Adjustable-loop implants are non-inferior to fixed-loop implants for femoral fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Button implants with an adjustable-loop device (ALD) are often used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Clinical research comparing ALDs with fixed-loop devices (FLD) has mainly been conducted in small patient populations with short follow-up times. To determine whether ALDs are safe to use in ACLR, a non-inferiority study with a large sample population and a long follow-up period would be beneficial. This study compared ALDs with FLDs to determine non-inferior revision surgery rates, knee stability, and patient-reported outcomes (PROM) in ACLRs.

METHODS

This non-inferiority register-based cohort study was conducted using data from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry (DKRR). A total of 12,723 patients > 15 years of age with primary ACLR using hamstring tendon autografts and either an FLD or ALD for femoral fixation were included: 9719 patients were in the FLD group, and 3014 patients were in the ALD group. The primary outcome was revision ACLR with a non-inferiority margin for ALDs at 4% at the 2-year follow-up. The secondary outcomes were anterior and rotatory knee stability and PROMs based on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at the 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The crude cumulative revision rates in ALD implants at 2 and 5 years were 2.1% (95% CI 1.62-2.68) and 5.0% (95% CI 4.22-5.96), respectively. In the FLD group, the rates were 2.2% (95% CI 1.89-2.48) at 2 years and 4.7% (95% CI 4.31-5.20) at 5 years. The 1-year side-to-side differences were 0.97 mm (95% CI 0.90-1.03) in the ALD group and 1.45 mm (95% CI 1.41-1.49) in the FLD group. In the FLD group, 13% had a positive pivot shift, and in the ALD group, 6% had a positive pivot shift. There were no differences in KOOS.

CONCLUSION

ALDs were non-inferior to FLDs regarding revision rates, knee stability, and patient-reported outcomes. Based on this conclusion, ALDs are safe to use for femoral fixation in ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Anatomical rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction provides excellent clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes following anatomical rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft using an adjustable-length femoral cortical fixation device with enough patients and a high follow-up rate.

METHODS

This study included 125 patients who underwent anatomical rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft. A BTB TightRope^® was used for femoral graft fixation. Clinical evaluations were performed more than 2 years after surgery using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Form. Patients interviewed by telephone were only subjectively evaluated. The side-to-side difference in anterior laxity at a manual maximum force was measured using the KT-2000 Arthrometer^®.

RESULTS

Among the 125 patients, 99 were ultimately included and 26 were lost to follow-up (follow-up rate: 79%). Eight patients had re-tear (re-tear rate: 8%) and six patients had ACL injuries to the contralateral knee. Three patients did not follow our rehabilitation programme. One patient suffered septic arthritis. These 18 patients were considered ineligible for clinical evaluations. Therefore, clinical evaluations were performed in 81 of the 99 patients (64 were available for direct follow-up and 17 were available for a telephone interview). The follow-up period was 30 ± 10 months (range 24-68 months). According to the IKDC subjective assessment, 48 (59%) and 33 (41%) knees were graded as normal and nearly normal, respectively. A loss of extension (3°-5°) was observed in five patients (8%), whereas one patient (2%) exhibited a loss of flexion (3°-5°). The Lachman test was negative in 63 patients (98%). The pivot shift test was negative in 59 patients (92%). The side-to-side difference in KT value was 0.4 ± 0.7 mm (range - 1-4 mm).

CONCLUSION

Anatomical rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft using an adjustable-length femoral cortical fixation device provided excellent clinical outcomes both subjectively and objectively more than 2 years after surgery, whereas 8 of the 99 patients had re-tear of the graft. The adjustable-length femoral cortical fixation device could be safely used in anatomical rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

A Comparison of Two-Year Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Clinical Outcomes Using All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft With Femoral/Tibial Cortical Suspensory Fixation Versus Tibial Interference Screw Fixation

PURPOSE

To contribute to future quadriceps tendon harvest and fixation guidelines in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by comparing 2-year patient-reported subjective knee outcome scores and incidence of graft-related complications between the shorter harvest all-inside tibial-femoral suspensory fixation (TFSF) approach versus the longer harvest standard tibial interference screw fixation technique.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with all soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft from January 2017 to May 2019 were identified for inclusion. Patients were matched into 2 cohorts of 62 based on reconstruction technique. All patients completed baseline and minimum 2-year International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner Activity Level, and Lysholm questionnaires and were queried regarding subsequent procedures and complications to the operative knee.

RESULTS

Average graft length for the all-inside TFSF was 69.55 (95% confidence interval 68.99-70.19) mm versus 79.27 (95% confidence interval 77.21-81.34) mm in the tibial screw fixation cohort (P = .00001). Two-year Lysholm scores were greater in the TFSF cohort (P = .04) but were not clinically significant. There was no difference in 2-year International Knee Documentation Committee (P = .09) or Tegner (P = .69) scores between cohorts, but more patients in the TFSF cohort returned to or exceeded their baseline activity level compared with the tibial screw fixation cohort (73% vs 61%, P = .25). Seven patients in the TFSF cohort versus 13 in the tibial screw fixation cohort reported anterior knee pain or kneeling difficulty (P = .22). There were no differences in reported complications.

CONCLUSIONS

All-inside soft-tissue quadriceps tendon autograft with TFSF resulted in clinically comparable subjective outcome scores at 2 years to tibial screw fixation. There were also no differences in complications or reports of anterior knee pain or kneeling difficulty. All-inside TFSF can be a viable alternative to tibial screw fixation for all-soft tissue quadriceps autograft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, comparative therapeutic trial.

Laterally shifted tibial tunnel can be the risk of residual knee laxity for double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

To elucidate the relationship between graft tunnel position and knee laxity in the cases of double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

Total of 132 cases were included. Femoral and tibial tunnels were evaluated by quadrant method on 3D-CT. As additional reference of tibia, the distances from medial tibial spine to the tunnel center (D_MS) and from Parsons' knob to the tunnel center (D_PK) were evaluated; %D_MS/ML and %D_PK/AP were calculated (ML and AP: mediolateral and anteroposterior width of tibial plateau). Preoperative and postoperative (1 year from surgery) stabilities were evaluated by Lachman and pivot-shift procedures. If there was ≥ 2 mm side-to-side difference, the subject was defined as having anterior knee laxity (AKL); if the pivot-shift phenomenon was observed with IKDC grade ≥ 1, there was rotatory knee laxity (RKL). Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted with the prevalence of AKL or RKL as the dependent variable and with tunnel positions as the independent variables.

RESULTS

Overall, 21 subjects (15.9%) showed AKL, and 15 subjects (11.4%) showed RKL. Those with postoperative laxity showed higher %D_MS/ML and higher femoral position than those without laxity. Regarding posterolateral bundle, logistic regression model estimated that %D_MS/ML was associated with the prevalence of AKL (B = 0.608; p < 0.001) and RKL (B = 0.789; p < 0.001); %high-low femoral tunnel position (B =  - 0.127; p = 0.023) was associated with that of RKL.

CONCLUSION

There was the risk of residual knee laxity in ACL-reconstructed knee when tibial tunnel shifted more laterally or higher femoral tunnel was created with regard to posterolateral bundle.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

[Lengths of the fixed loop and the adjustable loop in the coarse bone tunnel were compared to influence the widening of the femoral bone tunnel and the function of the knee joint]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of two different femoral cortical suspension devices (fixation loop and adjustable loop) on tunnel widening and knee function in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for 12 months.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were included in this study. According to the length of the loop(n)[n= total length of loop-(total length of femoral tunnel-total length of coarse tunnel)] in the rough bone tunnel, the patients were divided into A (adjustable loop was 0 mm in the coarse bone tunnel), B (fixation loop was greater than 0 mm and less than or equal to 10 mm in the coarse bone tunnel) and C (fixation loop was greater than 10 mm in the coarse bone tunnel) groups, of which 11 cases were in group A, 27 cases in group B and 22 cases in group C. In the three-dimensional reconstruction of the knee joint with multi-slice spiral CT, the widening of the bone tunnel in the three groups was compared. At the same time, IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner scores of the patients in the three groups were compared.

RESULTS

There were differences in the widening degree of the femoral canal among groups A, B and C, and the median difference of the widening degree of the femoral tunnel 12 months and immediately after the surgery was A < B < C. The difference of femoral canal widening in group A was significantly different from that in groups B and C (P < 0.05).According to the linear regression the relationship between the difference of the width of the femoral canal and the change of the length (n) of the loop in the coarse canal, it was found that there was a linear relationship between the value of n and the difference of the width of the bone canal. With the increase of the value of n, the difference of the width of the bone canal gradually became larger. The median difference of the width of the middle and superior tunnel was negative, while the median difference of the width of the middle and inferior tunnel was positive. During the follow-up, we found that there were no statistical differences in IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner scores among the three groups one year after surgery (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Twelve months after surgery, compared with group B (fixed loop group) and group C (fixed loop group), group A (adjustable loop group) had less bone tunnel widening.In groups A, B and C, as the length of the loop in coarse bone tunnel gradually increased, the width of bone tunnel became more significant. At the end of 12 months follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the medial and inferior femoral tunnel was significantly wider than immediately after surgery, and the medial and superior femoral tunnel had gradually begun to undergo tendon-bone healing. There was no significant difference in knee function scores among groups A, B, and C in the follow-up 12 months after surgery.

In Vitro Testing of 2 Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspensory Fixation Systems Versus Interference Screw for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

It is not clear whether the mechanical strength of adjustable-loop suspension devices (ALDs) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is device dependent and if these constructs are different from those of an interference screw.

Purpose:

To compare the biomechanical differences of 2 types of ALDs versus an interference screw.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

ACL reconstruction was performed on porcine femurs and bovine extensor tendons with 3 types of fixation devices: interference screw, UltraButton (UB) ALD, and TightRope (TR) ALD (n = 10 for each). In addition to specimen testing, isolated testing of the 2 ALDs was performed. The loading protocol consisted of 3 stages: preload (static 150 N load for 5 minutes), cyclic load (50-250 N at 1 Hz for 1000 cycles), and load to failure (crosshead speed 50 mm/min). Displacement at different cycles, ultimate failure load, yield load, stiffness, and failure mode were recorded.

Results:

In specimen testing, displacement of the ALDs at the 1000th cycle was similar (3.42 ± 1.34 mm for TR and 3.39 ± 0.92 mm for UB), but both were significantly lower than that of the interference screw (7.54 ± 3.18 mm) (P < .001 for both). The yield load of the UB (547 ± 173 N) was higher than that of the TR (420 ± 72 N) (P = .033) or the interference screw (386 ± 51 N; P = .013), with no significant difference between the latter 2. In isolated device testing, the ultimate failure load of the TR (862 ± 64 N) was significantly lower than that of the UB (1879 ± 126 N) (P < .001).

Conclusion:

Both ALDs showed significantly less displacement in cyclic loading at ultimate failure than the interference screw. The yield load of the UB was significantly higher than that of the other 2. The ultimate failure occurred at a significantly higher load for UB than it did for TR in isolated device testing.

Clinical Relevance:

Both UB and TR provided stronger fixation than an interference screw. Although difficult to assess, intrinsic differences in the mechanical properties of these ALDs may affect clinical outcomes.

No Difference in Outcomes Between Suspensory (Fixed-Loop Cortical Button) Versus Expandable Anteromedial Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring Tendons: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study in Male Patients

Purpose

To compare anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) autograft reconstruction using fixed-looped suspensory versus expandable femoral fixation through the anteromedial portal.

Methods

After we performed prospective power analysis and obtained institutional review board, 70 patients with ACL rupture were block randomized to the expandable or suspensory femoral fixation group (35 in each group). All patients received autologous hamstring autograft through the anteromedial portal and fixed with a sheath-screw system in the tibia. The primary outcome measures were anteroposterior knee stability at 2 years’ follow-up measured using the KT-1000 arthrometer and the degree of femoral and tibial tunnels’ widening measured by the use of computed tomography imaging performed immediately postoperative and 12 months postsurgery. Secondary outcome measures included pain score on a visual analog scale, the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 assessment form, the Lysholm score, and the Tegner activity scale at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

Results

Twenty-four patients were excluded from further analysis, leaving a total of 48 patients (24 in each group) for the final evaluation. The anteroposterior knee stability (KT-1000) showed no difference between groups at 24 months’ follow-up (P = .31). The percentile widening (%) of femoral and tibial tunnel at 1-year follow-up showed no difference also, except for greater values at the tibial coronal point T2 (P = .065) and tibial sagittal point T1 (P = .033) in the group of cortical buttons. Secondary clinical outcomes showed no statistical differences between groups at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months’ postoperatively. Numerical pain scale (visual analog scale) was similar in both groups except for postoperative day 7, where the AperFix group showed better results (P = .014). There were no major intraoperative and late postoperative complications in any of the groups.

Conclusions

Our results showed no significant differences in knee anteroposterior stability, tunnel enlargement or other clinical outcomes comparing expandable versus cortical button fixation in anteromedial hamstrings ACL reconstruction.

Level of Evidence

Level II, randomized controlled trial.

Confirming Proper Button Deployment of Suspensory Fixation During ACL Reconstruction

Background

Suspensory fixation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) grafts has emerged as a popular device for femoral graft fixation. However, improper deployment of the suspensory fixation can compromise proper graft tensioning, leading to failure and revision. Also, soft tissue interposition between the button and bone has been associated with graft migration and pain, occasionally requiring revision surgery. Many surgeons rely on manual testing and application of distal tension to the graft to confirm proper button deployment on the lateral cortex of the femur for ACL graft fixation.

Purpose

To determine the reliability of the manual resistance maneuver when applying distal tension to deploy the suspensory device along the lateral cortex of the femur.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

All patients undergoing ACLR with a suture button suspensory device for femoral fixation were eligible for enrollment in the study. The surgeries were performed by 3 board-certified, sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons at a single outpatient surgical center between May 2018 and June 2019. All grafts were passed in a retrograde manner into the femoral tunnel, and a vigorous manual tensioning maneuver in a distal direction was placed on the graft to deploy and secure along the lateral cortex of the femur. Intraoperative mini c-arm fluoroscopy was obtained to demonstrate proper suture button positioning. If interposing tissue or an improperly flipped button was identified, rectifying steps were undertaken and recorded.

Results

A total of 51 patients with a mean age of 33.3 years were included in the study. Of these patients, 74.5% had normal suture button positioning identified via intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, while 15.7% had interposed soft tissue and 9.8% had an improperly flipped button. In all cases, the surgeon was able to rectify the malpositioning intraoperatively.

Conclusion

Despite the manual sensation of proper suspensory button positioning, intraoperative fluoroscopy identified suture button deployment errors in ACLR 25% of the time. Correcting the malpositioning is not technically demanding. These findings advocate for routine intraoperative surveillance to confirm appropriate suture button seating during ACLR.

Adjustable Cortical Fixation Device for Quadriceps Tendon Repair: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND

Adjustable cortical fixation devices have demonstrated utility in orthopaedic applications, such as ankle syndesmosis repair.

PURPOSE

To assess the cyclic gap formation of a quadriceps tendon repair technique using an adjustable cortical fixation device compared with repair with knotless suture anchors and suture tape, a modification of conventional suture anchor repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen matched pairs of cadaveric knees were used. Specimens in each pair were randomized to undergo either modified suture anchor repair (control) or adjustable cortical fixation repair. The control repair was performed as previously described. The experimental repair was performed using 2 No. 2 FiberWire sutures placed into the quadriceps tendon in a running locked Krackow configuration and 2 adjustable loop devices passed through transosseous tunnels. The lagging strands of the devices were tensioned to seat the cortical fixation buttons at the inferior patellar pole and then tied to the free Krackow strands at the superior pole to complete the repair. The mean plastic gap (permanent tendon displacement that did not recover with cyclic extension) and mean maximum gap (peak displacement that occurred with cyclic knee flexion and partially recovered with extension) were evaluated during cyclic loading for 500 cycles of full knee extension to 90° of flexion.

RESULTS

At all testing intervals, the mean plastic gap was significantly smaller for the cortical fixation group versus the suture anchor group (P < .02). Similarly, the mean maximum gap was significantly smaller for the cortical fixation specimens at all testing intervals (P < .01). After cyclic loading, the mean maximum gap was significantly smaller in the cortical fixation group (4.80 ± 1.56 mm) versus the suture anchor group (8.47 ± 1.47 mm; P = < .001). The mean plastic gap was also significantly smaller in the cortical fixation versus the suture anchor group (3.25 ± 1.10 mm vs 6.57 ± 1.62 mm, respectively; P = < .001).

CONCLUSION

Quadriceps tendon repair using an adjustable cortical fixation device demonstrated superior biomechanical properties in cyclic displacement testing compared with repair using the suture anchor technique.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These results suggest that an adjustable cortical fixation device is a biomechanically viable alternative for quadriceps tendon repair.