Editorial Commentary: My Harvested Hamstring Autograft Is Too Small. Now What?

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictive Model Determines Hamstring Autograft Size for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Under 18 Years Old

Purpose

To evaluate the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging in determining hamstring autograft size preoperatively for pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Methods

We conducted an analysis of patients younger than 18 years who underwent quadrupled hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Semitendinosus tendon (ST) and gracilis tendon (GT) cross-sectional areas were measured on preoperative knee magnetic resonance imaging scans. Height, weight, body mass index, and sex were analyzed using ordinal regression analysis. A classification and regression tree (CART) was constructed to identify predictors of the predetermined intraoperative graft size of 8 mm or greater. Sensitivity and specificity were determined based on specified predictors.

Results

This study included 102 patients (52 female and 50 male patients). The average age was 15.8 ± 1.4 years. At the time of surgery, 38 patients (37.3%) had open physes, with an average age of 13.4 ± 0.96 years. Of the 102 patients, 55 (53.9%) had 8-mm or larger grafts, 31 (30.4%) had 7.5-mm grafts, and 16 (15.7%) had 7-mm or smaller grafts. In 12 patients (31.6%) with open physes, the graft size was less than 8 mm. Male patients were more likely to have 8-mm or larger grafts (P < .001), as were patients with a greater height (170.1 ± 7.3 cm vs 161.1 ± 12.0 cm, P = .013) and those with a greater weight (79.7 ± 23.4 kg vs 57.1 ± 16.2 kg, P = .005). For all patients, predictive modeling determined that if the cross-sectional areas of the ST and GT were 31.2 mm² or greater, then 87.5% of patients would have a graft size of 8 mm or greater with an 80% sensitivity and 74% specificity. Similarly, if the cross-sectional areas of the ST and GT were 31.4 mm² or greater in patients with open physes, then 100% of patients would have a graft size of 8 mm or greater with a 46% sensitivity and 99% specificity.

Conclusions

A preoperative summation of the cross-sectional areas of the ST and GT greater than 31 mm² in patients younger than 18 years with open or closed physes can help the surgeon preoperatively predict which patients will have an intraoperative graft size of 8 mm or greater. The risk factors for a smaller graft size include female sex, a shorter height, and a lighter weight.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Outcomes of single bundle arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a limited resource setting

OBJECTIVES

Despite various challenges, orthopaedic sports surgeons are still providing the arthroscopic service in low-income and middle-income countries like Nepal; however, it is hardly being reported. The main purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in the urban group and that of the rural group.

METHODS

We evaluated a total of 194 patients, including 98 patients in the urban group and 96 patients in the rural group, undergoing arthroscopic ACLR between August 2015 and February 2018, and had completed a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Subjective evaluations were performed using the Tegner-Lysolm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form. Laxity assessments were performed using the Lachman test and the Pivot-shift test. Functional evaluation included the range of motion, single-leg hop test and overall IKDC score. Radiological assessment was performed according to the IKDC guidelines. SPSS was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

There was statistically significant differences in the subjective assessments between 2 groups. No statistically significant differences existed between 2 groups in terms of laxity and functional assessments. However, the proportion of laxity, in terms of Lachman test and Pivot-shift test, was higher in the young and active individuals and the proportion of abnormal and severely abnormal in all parameters of functional outcomes was higher in the older female in the rural group. Graft failure occurred in 19 (17.6%) knees in the urban group and 17 (16.8%) knees in the rural group. Graft failure in the urban group was higher in young and active male patients, whereas failure in the rural group was more in female patients. Similarly, overall infection occurred in 13 (6.2%) knees, including 5 (2.3%) deep infections and 8 (3.8%) superficial infections.

CONCLUSION

We advised similar rehabilitation protocol for all the patients; however, the outcomes were significantly lower in patients living in rural areas as they are found to have poor compliance with the rehabilitation protocol. The overall graft failure rate was 17.2%; however, the reoperation rate was higher in the urban group than the rural group. The rate of deep infection was higher in the rural group as compared with the urban group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.