1
|
Lee SM, Kim JS, Moon NH, Woo SH, Park C, Shin WC. Recovery After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Combined Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Tears Compared With Isolated Pathology. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11:23259671231167908. [PMID: 37359977 PMCID: PMC10286186 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231167908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Outcomes for patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) treated with hip arthroscopy can differ depending on whether there is underlying intra-articular pathology. Purpose To evaluate the outcomes of patients after undergoing hip arthroscopy depending on their underlying pathology (isolated FAI, isolated labral tear, or combined FAI and a labral tear) using the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods A total of 75 patients diagnosed with FAI with or without labral tears and isolated labral tears who underwent hip arthroscopy performed by the same surgeon at a single institution from January 2014 to December 2019 were included in this study. All patients had at least 2 years of follow-up data. Patients were divided into 3 groups as follows: patients with FAI and an intact labrum; patients with an isolated labral tear; and patients with combined FAI and a labral tear. The iHOT-12 scores at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18, and >24 months postoperatively were compared and analyzed. Outcome scores were also evaluated in terms of the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and the patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS). Results Of 75 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy, 14 had FAI, 23 had labral tears, and 38 had both. All groups showed significant improvements on the iHOT-12 from preoperative to the final follow-up (FAI, from 37.64 ± 3.77 to 93.64 ± 1.50; labral tear, from 33.70 ± 3.55 to 93 ± 1.24; combined, from 28.55 ± 3.15 to 93.03 ± 0.88) (P < .001 for all). However, compared with other groups, the patients with FAI and a labral tear had lower scores at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (P < .001), highlighting a slower rate of recovery. For all groups, recovery to normal function according to the SCB was 100% at 12 months, and satisfaction according to the PASS was 100% at 18 months postoperatively. Conclusion The final iHOT-12 scores were similar at 18 months regardless of the pathology treated; however, patients with FAI and a labral tear took longer to reach their plateau.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang-Min Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Shin Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Nam Hoon Moon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Hun Woo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Chankue Park
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Chul Shin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Polce EM, Vadhera AS, Fu MC, Singh H, Haunschild ED, Garrigues GE, Yanke AB, Forsythe B, Cole BJ, Verma NN. Determining the Time Required to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes on the PROMIS Upper Extremity Questionnaire After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11:23259671231157038. [PMID: 37051286 PMCID: PMC10084545 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231157038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Clinically significant outcome (CSO) thresholds for the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Upper Extremity (PROMIS-UE) score have been previously defined after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). However, the time required to achieve CSOs for the PROMIS-UE score is unknown. Purpose To (1) determine the time required to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) score thresholds after RCR for the PROMIS-UE questionnaire and (2) identify patient factors associated with earlier or delayed achievement of these clinical benchmarks. Study Design Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods A prospectively maintained institutional database was retrospectively reviewed for consecutive patients who underwent RCR between January 2018 and January 2019. Patients were included if they completed the PROMIS-UE questionnaire both preoperatively and at standardized postoperative time intervals: 5 to 7 months (6-month time point), 11 to 13 months (1-year time point), and ≥23 months (2-year time point). Kaplan-Meier survival curves with interval censoring were used to define the cumulative percentage of patients who achieved the MCID, SCB, and PASS. Patient variables associated with earlier or delayed achievement of the MCID, SCB, and PASS were determined using Weibull parametric survival regression analysis. Results Included were 105 patients undergoing RCR (age, 57.3 ± 10.3 years; body mass index, 31.5 ± 6.1 kg/m2). By 2-year follow-up, the cumulative percentage of patients achieving the MCID, SCB, and PASS was 86.7%, 76.2%, and 74.3%, respectively. The mean time required to reach the MCID, SCB, and PASS score thresholds was 9.5 ± 3.8, 10.3 ± 4.4, and 9.8 ± 4.6 months, respectively. Factors associated with delayed achievement of CSOs included greater baseline PROMIS-UE score (MCID and SCB) and workers' compensation insurance (PASS). Greater baseline PROMIS-UE scores were associated with earlier achievement of the PASS. Conclusion Most patients achieved CSOs for the PROMIS-UE within 12 months of RCR. Patient-specific factors found to be associated with earlier or delayed achievement of CSOs can be used to inform patient discussions on the expected timeline for recovery after RCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M. Polce
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Evan M. Polce, BS, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53703, USA () (Twitter: @EvanPolce)
| | - Amar S. Vadhera
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael C. Fu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Harsh Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Eric D. Haunschild
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Grant E. Garrigues
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Adam B. Yanke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Brian Forsythe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Brian J. Cole
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nikhil N. Verma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Owens JS, Jimenez AE, Lee MS, George T, Maldonado DR, Domb BG. Determining Clinically Meaningful Thresholds for the Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale in Athletes Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50:3009-3018. [PMID: 35971944 DOI: 10.1177/03635465221114400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The minimal clinically important difference (MCID), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and maximum outcome improvement (MOI) satisfaction threshold for the Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS) have not been established in athletes undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). PURPOSE To determine threshold MCID, PASS, SCB, and MOI satisfaction threshold values for the HOS-SSS in athletes undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS at minimum 2-year follow-up. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS Anchor questions were administered to recreational, organized amateur, high school, college, and professional athletes who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS between May 2015 and March 2019. Patients were included if they were younger than 50 years, answered the anchor questions, and had preoperative and minimum 2-year follow-up for the HOS-SSS, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Exclusion criteria were Tönnis grade >1, hip dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle <18°), and previous ipsilateral hip surgery or conditions. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine PASS, SCB, and MOI satisfaction for the HOS-SSS. Two distribution methods were used to calculate MCID for HOS-SSS. RESULTS A total of 225 athletes who underwent primary hip arthroscopy met the inclusion criteria. Of those athletes, 200 (88.9%) who had minimum 2-year follow-up and information regarding return to sport (RTS) were included. The cohort included 124 (62.0%) women and 76 (38.0%) men with a mean ± standard deviation age of 29.4 ± 10.4 years, body mass index of 25.6 ± 5.4, and follow-up of 29.5 ± 5.1 months. Athletes experienced significant improvements in HOS-SSS, mHHS, NAHS, and VAS from preoperative to latest postoperative follow-up (P < .001), and mean satisfaction was 8.2. The RTS rate was 83.7%. ROC analysis determined that the PASS, MOI satisfaction threshold, SCB absolute score, SCB change score, and MCID (baseline/change score methods) for the HOS-SSS were 77.0, 44.6%, 92.7, 30.6, and 10.6, respectively, with athletes achieving thresholds at high rates (80.0%, 80.5%, 45.0%, 54.0%, and 79.5%, respectively). CONCLUSION This study identified values for the HOS-SSS that can be used to define clinically meaningful outcomes in athletes after primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS. The PASS, MOI satisfaction threshold, SCB absolute score, SCB change score, and MCID for the HOS-SSS at minimum 2-year follow-up in athletes after primary hip arthroscopy were 77.0, 44.6%, 92.7, 30.6, and 10.6, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jade S Owens
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Andrew E Jimenez
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael S Lee
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Tom George
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haunschild ED, Condron NB, Gilat R, Fu MC, Wolfson T, Garrigues GE, Nicholson G, Forsythe B, Verma N, Cole BJ. Establishing clinically significant outcomes of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity questionnaire after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:2231-2239. [PMID: 33878484 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.03.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS Since its introduction, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (PROMIS UE) assessment has been increasingly used in shoulder arthroplasty outcome measurement. However, determination of clinically significant outcomes using the PROMIS UE has yet to be investigated following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). We hypothesized that we could establish clinically significant outcomes of the PROMIS UE outcome assessment in patients undergoing primary RTSA and identify significant baseline patient factors associated with achievement of these measures. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing primary RTSA between 2018 and 2019 who received preoperative baseline and follow-up PROMIS UE assessments at 12 months after surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Domain-specific anchor questions pertaining to pain and function assessed at 12 months after surgery were used to determine minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) values for the PROMIS UE using receiver operating characteristic curve and area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis. Univariate logistic regression analysis was then performed to identify significant patient factors associated with achieving the MCID, SCB, or PASS. RESULTS A total of 95 patients met all inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. By use of an anchor-based method, the PASS value was 36.68 (sensitivity, 0.795; specificity, 0.765; AUC, 0.793) and the SCB value was 11.62 (sensitivity, 0.597; specificity, 1.00; AUC, 0.806). By use of a distribution-based method, the MCID value was calculated to be 4.27. Higher preoperative PROMIS UE scores were a positive predictor in achievement of the PASS (odds ratio [OR], 1.107; P = .05), whereas lower preoperative PROMIS UE scores were associated with obtaining SCB (OR, 0.787; P < .001). Greater baseline forward flexion was negatively associated with achievement of the PASS (OR, 0.986; P = .033) and MCID (OR, 0.976, P = .013). Of the patients, 83.2%, 69.5%, and 47.4% achieved the MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively. CONCLUSION This study defines the MCID, SCB, and PASS for the PROMIS UE outcome assessment in patients undergoing primary RTSA, of whom the majority achieved meaningful outcome improvement at 12 months after surgery. These values may be used in assessing the outcomes and extent of functional improvement following RTSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ron Gilat
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rosinsky PJ, Kyin C, Maldonado DR, Shapira J, Meghpara MB, Ankem HK, Lall AC, Domb BG. Determining Clinically Meaningful Thresholds for the Nonarthritic Hip Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy 2021; 37:3113-3121. [PMID: 33865933 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to improve the interpretability of the Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) by determining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement. The secondary aim was to identify variables associated with achievement of the thresholds. METHODS Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and completed postoperative questionnaires between August 2019 and March 2020 were included. Patients were excluded if they underwent previous ipsilateral hip surgery, underwent gluteus medius repair, or had a previous hip condition. The MCID, PASS, and SCB thresholds were calculated for the NAHS at minimum 1-, 2-, and 5-year follow-up. Distribution- and anchor-based methods with receiver operating characteristic analysis were used to determine the thresholds. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of achieving the MCID and PASS. RESULTS The study included 343 hips with an average follow-up period of 48 months. On the basis of the distribution-based approach, the MCID was 8.7 using a method in which the standard deviation of the baseline score was divided by 2. By use of a method in which the standard deviation of the change score was divided by 2, MCID scores of 9.1, 8.3, and 12.6 resulted at a minimum of 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. The PASS thresholds for these time points were 81.9, 85.6, and 81.9. The absolute SCB thresholds were 91.9, 94.4, and 93.1 and the change score thresholds were 30.6, 24.4, and 29.3 for a minimum of 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. The preoperative NAHS was positively associated with achievement of the PASS and inversely related to achievement of the MCID. CONCLUSIONS This study provides important clinical thresholds for the NAHS. These thresholds were determined for minimum 1-, 2-, and 5-year time points. The MCID was determined as 8.7, the PASS ranged between 81.9 and 85.6, and the absolute SCB value ranged from 91.9 to 94.4. The preoperative NAHS was found to be positively associated with achievement of the PASS and inversely related to achievement of the MCID. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, retrospective case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip J Rosinsky
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Cynthia Kyin
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | | | - Jacob Shapira
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Mitchell B Meghpara
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; AMITA Health St. Alexius Medical Center, Hoffman Estates, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Hari K Ankem
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Ajay C Lall
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; AMITA Health St. Alexius Medical Center, Hoffman Estates, Illinois, U.S.A.; American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Benjamin G Domb
- American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.; AMITA Health St. Alexius Medical Center, Hoffman Estates, Illinois, U.S.A.; American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gender and Age-Specific Differences Observed in Rates of Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes 5-Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy 2021; 37:2488-2496.e1. [PMID: 33677021 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the impact of age and gender on achieving meaningful outcomes among minimum patients 5 years after undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS by a single fellowship-trained surgeon between January 2012 and October 2014 were analyzed. Study inclusion criteria included any patient undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS, with 5 years follow-up. Preoperative and 5-year postoperative functional scores were collected, including the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living Subscale (HOS-ADL), HOS-Sport Subscale (HOS-SS), modified Harris hip score (mHHS), and Visual Analog Scale for satisfaction. Patients were matched 1:1 by gender and age to compare outcomes between these 2 demographics. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) were calculated for each functional measure and compared by gender and age. RESULTS Of the 340 patients (70.5%) with 5 years' follow up, 150 were matched by gender and age into one of the following groups: female patients <30 years, female patients 30 to 45 years, female patients >45 years, male patients <30 years, male patients 30 to 45 years, and male patients >45 years of age. At minimum 5-year follow-up, all 6 groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement in the functional outcome score averages and pain (P < .001 for all). Both within gender and within age category analysis of postoperative functional scores did not demonstrate any statistical differences (P > .05). Analysis of achieving MCID and PASS demonstrated that females had higher rates of reaching the HOS-SS and mHHS threshold for achieving MCID as compared to their male counterparts (P < .05). Furthermore, patients <30 years old had higher rates of reaching the HOS-ADL and mHHS for achieving PASS when compared to patients >45 years old (P < .05). CONCLUSION The majority of patients achieve clinically significant outcome improvement at 5-year follow-up after arthroscopic FAIS surgery. Females reach the mHHS threshold for achieving MCID at significantly higher rates than males. Patients <30 years of age achieved PASS on the HOS-ADL and mHHS threshold scores at higher rates than those >45 years old. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, case-control study.
Collapse
|
7
|
Forlenza EM, Lu Y, Cohn MR, Baker J, Lavoie-Gagne O, Yanke AB, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Forsythe B. Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System After Biceps Tenodesis. Arthroscopy 2021; 37:1731-1739. [PMID: 33450409 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.12.236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To establish thresholds for improvement in patient-reported outcome scores that correspond with clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) including the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) computer adaptive testing (CAT) and pain interference (PIF) CAT after biceps tenodesis (BT) and to assess patient variables that are associated with achieving these outcomes. METHODS After institutional review board approval was obtained, a prospectively maintained institutional database was queried for patients undergoing BT between December 2017 and August 2019. Patients undergoing BT in isolation or BT in conjunction with rotator cuff debridement, SLAP repair, subacromial decompression, or distal clavicle excision were included in the analysis. Anchor- and distribution-based methods were used to calculate the MCID whereas an anchor-based method was used to calculate SCB and the PASS for PROMIS UE CAT and PIF CAT. RESULTS A total of 112 patients (86.8% follow-up) who underwent BT were included for analysis. The MCID, net SCB, absolute SCB, and PASS for PROMIS UE CAT were 4.02, 9.25, 43.4, and 41.1, respectively. The MCID, net SCB, absolute SCB, and PASS for PROMIS PIF CAT were -4.12, -10.7, 52.4, and 52.4, respectively. Higher preoperative UE CAT and PIF CAT scores, preoperative opioid use, depression, and living alone were negative predictors of CSO achievement. Male sex and regular participation in exercise were positive predictors of CSO achievement. CONCLUSIONS Patients with higher preoperative UE scores were less likely to achieve the MCID (odds ratio [OR], 0.84), whereas patients with higher preoperative PIF scores were less likely to achieve absolute SCB and the PASS (OR, 0.83-0.89). Most patients achieved the MCID for PIF CAT (70.5%) and UE CAT (62.5%) at final follow-up. Male sex (OR, 4.38-9.15) and regular exercise participation (OR, 6.45-18.94) positively predicted CSO achievement, whereas preoperative opioid use (OR, 0.06), depression (OR, 0.23), and living alone (OR, 0.90) were negative predictors of CSO achievement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yining Lu
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Matthew R Cohn
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - James Baker
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | | | - Adam B Yanke
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Brian J Cole
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Nikhil N Verma
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Brian Forsythe
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Beck EC, Nwachukwu BU, Chahla J, Clapp IM, Jan K, Nho SJ. Complete Capsular Closure Provides Higher Rates of Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement and Higher Survivorship Versus Partial Closure After Hip Arthroscopy at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy 2021; 37:1833-1842. [PMID: 33529782 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To (1) compare the rates of reaching threshold hip-specific outcome scores for achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) in patients who underwent partial versus complete T-capsulotomy repair and (2) identify the failure rates in each group 5 years after undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). METHODS Data from consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS performed by a single fellowship-trained surgeon from January 2011 to March 2013 were collected and analyzed. Baseline data, hip-specific outcomes, and clinical failure rates were recorded at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively. Patients with partial T-capsulotomy repair were matched 1:3 by age, body mass index, and sex to patients with complete T-capsulotomy repair. Threshold scores for achieving the MCID and PASS were calculated and compared between the 2 groups. Additionally, rates of revision and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were compared between the groups. RESULTS A total of 379 patients were available for analysis (39 partial and 340 complete repairs), with 100 patients included in the matching process (25 in the partial-repair group and 75 in the complete-repair group). Comparison of radiographic parameters, including the Tönnis grade, alpha angle, and lateral center-edge angle, between the 2 groups showed no statistically significant difference (P > .05 for all). Comparison of postoperative score averages between the partial- and complete-closure groups showed a significant difference in the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living Subscale (85.4 ± 17.7 vs 94.6 ± 7.8, P < .001), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (76.6 ± 26.2 vs 89.3 ± 16.8, P = .034), modified Harris Hip Score (83.2 ± 19.7 vs 90.5 ± 11.2, P = .035), and visual analog scale pain score (24.5 ± 30.8 vs 13.4 ± 15.8, P = .035). A total of 65 complete-repair patients (95.6%) achieved the MCID for at least 1 outcome measure versus 18 patients with partial repair (78.3%) (P = .04). A total of 69 complete-repair patients (92%) achieved the PASS for at least 1 outcome measure versus 18 partial-repair patients (72%) (P = .017). Of the 39 partial-repair patients, 35.9% (n = 14) underwent revision or conversion to THA, as compared with 2.9% (n = 10) in the overall cohort. CONCLUSIONS At a minimum 5-year follow-up, patients with complete capsular closure after hip arthroscopy for FAIS show superior long-term outcomes and achieve higher rates of meaningful clinical success when compared with patients with partial capsular closure. Furthermore, patients with partial capsular repair undergo revision or conversion to THA at high rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Beck
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A..
| | - Benedict U Nwachukwu
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Jorge Chahla
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Ian M Clapp
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Kyleen Jan
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Shane J Nho
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Beck EC, Nwachuckwu BU, Jan K, Nho SJ. Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Adolescents Provides Clinically Significant Outcome Benefit at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy 2021; 37:1467-1473.e2. [PMID: 33359159 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.12.188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the rates of achieving clinically significant outcomes as defined by the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), or substantial clinical benefit (SCB) in adolescent patients and the rates of clinical failure 5 years after undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). METHODS Data from consecutive adolescent patients (defined by the American Academy of Pediatrics as age 11 to 21 years) who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with routine capsular closure for the treatment of FAIS between January 2012 and January 2015 by a single, fellowship-trained surgeon was collected. Baseline data, clinical outcomes including Hip Outcome Score (HOS)-Activities of Daily Living, HOS-Sports Subscale, modified Harris hip score, international Hip Outcome Tool, and clinical failure rates were recorded at 5 years after operative. Clinical failure was defined by revision hip arthroscopy or conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Clinically significant outcomes was defined as achieving MCID, PASS, or SCB on at least 1 hip-specific outcome measure. RESULTS Of the 139 eligible patients, a total of 85 (60.4%) patients (85 hips) were included in the final analysis, with an age and body mass index average of 17.6 ± 2.5 years (range 13-21) and 22.3 ± 3.1 kg/m2, respectively. The majority of the patients were female (80.6%) and participated in sports (76.2%). There was statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative score averages across every reported outcome (P < .001). At 5 years, 88.4%, 67.6%, and 64.9% reached at least 1 threshold for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, whereas 89.2% achieved at least one of the meaningful outcome thresholds. Last, 2 patients (2.4%) failed clinically, with both undergoing revision (2.4%) because of continued pain. There were no conversions to total hip arthroplasty. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that a large majority (89.2%) of adolescent patients undergoing primary arthroscopic treatment for symptomatic FAIS achieved meaningful clinically significant outcomes. Furthermore, only 2.4% of patients failed clinically, requiring revision hip arthroscopy because of continued pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV, Retrospective Case Series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Beck
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
| | | | - Kyleen Jan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Shane J Nho
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zimmerer A, Janz V, Sobau C, Wassilew GI, Miehlke W. Defining the Clinically Meaningful Outcomes for Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at Minimum 10-Year Follow-up: The Timing of Surgery Is Crucial. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9:2325967120985140. [PMID: 33718501 PMCID: PMC7922622 DOI: 10.1177/2325967120985140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has become a common procedure. However, meaningful long-term clinical outcomes have not been defined. Purpose To define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) at a minimum 10-year follow-up in patients undergoing arthroscopic treatment for FAIS and identify preoperative predictors for achievement of the MCID, SCB, and PASS. Study Design Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods A consecutive series of patients undergoing arthroscopic treatment for FAIS between 2007 and 2009 with a minimum 10-year follow-up was analyzed. Patient data included patient characteristics, radiographic parameters, and the pre- and postoperative mHHS and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain score. Paired t tests were used to compare the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The MCID was determined by calculating half of the standard deviation, and SCB and PASS were calculated by the anchor method. Correlation and logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors for the achievement of the MCID, SCB, and PASS. Results A total of 44 patients (27 men, 17 women) were included. The mean age and body mass index were 42.2 years (range, 16-67 years) and 22.3 kg/m2 (range, 16.76-29.78 kg/m2), respectively. The MCID, absolute SCB, net change SCB, and PASS of the mHHS were calculated to be 19.6, 90.1, 31.5, and 84.4 points, respectively. Preoperative symptom duration was identified as an independent predictor for the achievement of meaningful clinical outcomes. The median symptom durations for patients who achieved the MCID, absolute SCB, net change SCB, and PASS were 11.7, 9.1, 9.0, and 10.8 months, respectively. The median symptom duration for patients who did not achieve the MCID, absolute SCB, net change SCB, and PASS were 15.8, 17.4, 17.3, and 18.4 months, respectively. No other statistically significant correlations were found. Conclusion The preoperative duration of symptoms was identified as an independent predictor for achievement of the MCID, SCB, and PASS. These findings can be helpful in accelerating the transition to surgical treatment of FAIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Zimmerer
- ARCUS Sportklinik Pforzheim, Germany.,Department of Orthopaedics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Viktor Janz
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | | | - Georgi I Wassilew
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Slullitel PA, Pascual-Garrido C. Editorial Commentary: Reach Over the Top and Preserve the Hip Labrum. Arthroscopy 2021; 37:552-553. [PMID: 33546793 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.12.198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
There is increasing interest in fine tuning of hip arthroscopy to improve the long-term outcomes of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgery. Recently, some advocated for rim trimming and labral refixation without taking down the labrum, using a so-called over-the-top technique. Although some studies have already reported on the outcomes of this procedure, very few have focused on how maintaining an unharmed chondrolabral junction may decrease cartilage wear over time. Preserving labral attachment should be the standard of care in the treatment of FAI, to keep the suction seal working normally.
Collapse
|
12
|
Beck EC, Drager J, Nwachukwu BU, Rasio J, Jan K, Chahla J, Nho SJ. Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Achieve Clinically Significant Improvement After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Case-Control Study With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48:1616-1624. [PMID: 32407129 DOI: 10.1177/0363546520916473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients with borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) is becoming a more common practice. However, the literature on achieving meaningful outcomes at midterm follow-up, as well as predictors of these outcomes, is limited. PURPOSE To (1) compare the rates of achieving meaningful clinical outcomes between patients with and without BHD and (2) identify the predictors for achieving clinical success among patients with BHD 5 years after undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS Data from consecutive patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery with routine capsular closure for the treatment of FAIS between January 2012 and August 2014 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Patients with BHD (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA] 20°-25°) were matched 1:2 by age (±1 year) and body mass index (BMI; ±5 kg/m2) to control patients with normal acetabular coverage (LCEA 25°-40°). Data collected included baseline and 5-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were calculated for each patient-reported outcome measure and compared between the 2 groups. A binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of achieving the MCID and PASS in the BHD group. RESULTS The MCID in the BHD group was defined as 9.6, 14.1, and 9.5 for the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale, and modified Harris Hip Score, respectively. Threshold scores for achieving the PASS in both groups were 90.9, 76.6, and 81.9, respectively. A total of 88 patients were identified with having BHD and were matched to 176 controls. No statistical differences were identified for age, BMI, or sex. Both the BHD and the non-BHD groups had statistically significant increases in patient-reported outcome scores over the 5-year period, but the difference in both groups was not statistically significant (P > .05 for all). There was no statistical difference in the frequency of patients in the BHD and non-BHD groups achieving the MCID (86.6% vs 85.2%, respectively; P = .804) or PASS (76.0% vs 73.7%, respectively; P = .675) on at least 1 outcome measure. The logistic regression model demonstrated that being physically active (odds ratio [OR], 27.59; P = .005) and being female (OR, 14.64; P = .025) were independent predictors of achieving the MCID, while running (OR, 11.1; P = .002), being female (OR, 7.6; P = .011), and a larger preoperative LCEA (OR, 2.3; P = .001) were independent preoperative predictors of achieving the PASS. CONCLUSION The rates of achieving clinical success 5 years after undergoing arthroscopic treatment with capsular closure for FAIS were not significantly different between patients with BHD and those with normal acetabular coverage. Being physically active, running for exercise, female sex, and a larger LCEA were preoperative predictors of achieving clinical success at 5 years in patients with BHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Beck
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Justin Drager
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Benedict U Nwachukwu
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jonathan Rasio
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kyleen Jan
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jorge Chahla
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shane J Nho
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Beck EC, Nwachukwu BU, Mehta N, Jan K, Okoroha KR, Rasio J, Nho SJ. Defining Meaningful Functional Improvement on the Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome. Arthroscopy 2020; 36:734-742.e2. [PMID: 31735577 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To (1) define Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB), Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS), and Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the visual analog scale (VAS) Satisfaction in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS), and (2) identify preoperative predictors of achieving each outcome end-point. METHODS Data from consecutive patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy between November 2014 and January 2017 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with clinical and radiographic diagnosis of FAIS, who failed nonoperative treatment, underwent primary hip arthroscopy to address the FAIS, and had at minimum 2-year follow-up. Baseline data and postoperative patient-reported outcome scores were recorded at 2 years postoperatively. To quantify clinical significance of outcome achievement on the VAS)Satisfaction, we calculated MCID, PASS, and SCB for this outcome measure. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify preoperative predictors of achieving SCB, PASS, and MCID satisfaction. RESULTS A total of 335 patients were included in the final analysis, with an average age and body mass index (BMI) of 32.8 (standard deviation ± 12.4) years and 25.2 (standard deviation ± 5.3), respectively, and the majority being female (69.3%). The values on the VAS satisfaction were identified to represent MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively: 52.8, 80.9, and 89.7. The rates of achieving clinically significant improvement on the VAS Satisfaction was 85.6%, 68.1%, and 56.9% for MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively. A larger preoperative alpha angle was predictive for achieving SCB (odds ratio [OR], 1.076; P = .046), whereas lower BMI (OR, 0.955; P = .047) and larger preoperative alpha angle (OR, 1.12; P = .025) were predictors for achieving PASS. CONCLUSIONS This study identified threshold VAS satisfaction scores of 52.8, 80.9, and 89.7 for achieving MCID, SCB, and PASS, respectively, at 2-year follow-up following hip arthroscopy for FAIS. Furthermore, preoperative variables including larger preoperative alpha angles and lower BMI are predictors of achieving superior clinical satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, Case Series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Beck
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
| | - Benedict U Nwachukwu
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Nabil Mehta
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Kyleen Jan
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Kelechi R Okoroha
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Jonathan Rasio
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Shane J Nho
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Martin RL, Kivlan BR, Christoforetti JJ, Wolff AB, Nho SJ, Salvo JP, Van Thiel G, Matsuda D, Carreira DS. A tiered system using substantial clinical benefit and patient acceptable symptomatic state scores to evaluate 2-year outcomes of hip arthroscopy with the Hip Outcome Score. J Hip Preserv Surg 2020; 7:62-69. [PMID: 32382431 PMCID: PMC7195928 DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnz074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Revised: 12/24/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
There is no information to define variations in hip arthroscopy outcomes at 2-year follow-up using the Hip Outcome Score (HOS). To offer a tiered system using HOS absolute substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) scores for 2-year hip arthroscopy outcome assessment. This was a retrospective review of patients having hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and/or chondrolabral pathology. On initial assessment and 2 years (±2 months) post-operatively, subjects completed the HOS activity of daily living (ADL) and Sports subscales, categorical self-rating of function and visual analog scale for satisfaction with surgery. Receiver operator characteristic analysis identified absolute SCB and PASS HOS ADL and Sports subscale scores. Subjects consisted of 462 (70%) females and 196 (30%) males with a mean age of 35.3 years [standard deviation (SD) 13] and mean follow-up of 722 days (SD 29). SCB and PASS scores for the HOS ADL and Sports subscales were accurate in identifying those at a ‘nearly normal’ and ‘normal’ self- report of function and at least 75% and 100% levels of satisfaction (area under the curve >0.70). This study provides tiered SCB and PASS HOS scores to define variations in 2-year (±2 months) outcome after hip arthroscopy. HOS ADL subscale scores of 84 and 94 and Sports subscale scores of 61 and 87 were associated with a ‘nearly normal’ and ‘normal’ self-report of function, respectively. HOS ADL subscale scores of 86 and 94 and Sports subscale score of 74 and 87 were associated with being at least 75% and 100% satisfied with surgery, respectively. Level of evidence: III, retrospective comparative study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- RobRoy L Martin
- Department of Physical Therapy, Rangos School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University, 600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA.,UPMC Center for Sports Medicine, 3200 South Water Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15203, USA
| | - Benjamin R Kivlan
- Department of Physical Therapy, Rangos School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University, 600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA
| | - John J Christoforetti
- Texas Health Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 1120 Raintree Circle Allen, TX 75013, USA
| | - Andrew B Wolff
- Hip Preservation and Sports Medicine, Washington Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2021 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006, USA
| | - Shane J Nho
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hip Preservation Center, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W. Congress Parkway Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - John P Salvo
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Hip Arthroscopy Program, The Sydney Kimmel Medical College, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Geoff Van Thiel
- Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, US National Soccer Teams, Chicago Blackhawks Medical Network, 1653 W Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Dean Matsuda
- Hip Arthroscopy DISC Sports and Spine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 3501 Jamboree Rd #1250, Newport Beach, CA 92660, USA
| | - Dominic S Carreira
- Peachtree Orthopedics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 3200 Downwood Cir NW Office - Suite 700, Atlanta, GA 30327, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Clapp IM, Nwachukwu BU, Beck EC, Rasio JP, Alter T, Allison B, Nho SJ. What is the Role of Kinesiophobia and Pain Catastrophizing in Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2020; 2:e97-e104. [PMID: 32368745 PMCID: PMC7190542 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2019.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To (1) investigate trends in kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS), and (2) determine whether kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing scores are associated with achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for any of the hip-specific patient-reported outcome questionnaires. Methods Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for treatment of FAIS between December 2016 and March 2017 were prospectively enrolled. Patients received the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophoibia-11 (TSK-11) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) questionnaires preoperatively, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. They also received the hip-specific patient-reported outcome questionnaires (Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living and Sport-Specific subscales, modified Harris Hip Score, and International Hip Outcome Tool-12), as well as visual analog scale for satisfaction and pain preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. The threshold for achieving MCID was determined for each hip outcome tool, and patients achieving MCID were compared with those who did not. Results A total of 85 (80.2%) patients (mean age: 33.7 ± 12.4 years; female: 75.3%) were included in the final analysis. At 1-year follow-up, there was a significant reduction in TSK-11 scores (26.22 ± 5.99 to 18.70 ± 6.49; P < .001) and PCS scores (17.81 ± 10.13 to 4.77 ± 7.57; P < .001) when compared with preoperative scores. 1-year PCS scores were significantly lower in patients achieving MCID compared with patients failing to achieve MCID (3.2 ± 4.4 vs 10.8 ± 15.2; P = .006). There were no significant differences in TSK-11 scores between those achieving and not achieving MCID. Conclusions Patient kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing both show significant improvements 1 year after undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS. However, pain catastrophizing scores at 1 year are significantly greater in patients not achieving MCID, whereas no association was identified between kinesiophobia and likelihood for MCID achievement. This suggests PCS may be a more useful tool than TSK-11 during postoperative rehabilitation for identifying patients at risk for not achieving MCID. Level of Evidence Level II, prospective case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian M Clapp
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Benedict U Nwachukwu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Edward C Beck
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Jonathan P Rasio
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Thomas Alter
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Bradley Allison
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Shane J Nho
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|