Trochlear Dysplasia Does Not Affect the Outcomes of Patellofemoral Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation

Impact of Wiberg Patellar Type on Outcomes and Survival Following Cell-Based Cartilage Repair for Patellar Chondral Lesions at Midterm Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Cell-based cartilage repair procedures of the patellofemoral joint have less reliable outcomes than those of the tibiofemoral joint. No previous studies have evaluated the influence of patellar shape on cell-based cartilage repair outcomes. Patellar dysplasia may predispose patients to worse outcomes after cell-based cartilage repair.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between Wiberg patellar type and outcomes after cell-based cartilage repair (autologous chondrocyte implantation or particulated juvenile allograft cartilage transplantation) for the treatment of patellar chondral lesions at a minimum 2-year follow-up. It was hypothesized that Wiberg classification of patellar shape would have no effect on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or graft survival.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients undergoing autologous chondrocyte implantation or particulated juvenile allograft cartilage transplantation for full-thickness patellar chondral defects between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed after institutional review board approval. The change in PROMs, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Kujala, and Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey Mental and Physical scores, from pre- to postoperatively and the percentage of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for IKDC and Kujala scores were compared for the Wiberg type A versus Wiberg type B versus Wiberg type C groups. The log-rank test was used to evaluate for differences in survival between subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients (63 knees) were included, with a mean age of 33.3 ± 8.6 years, median body mass index of 26.0 (IQR, 21.8-30.2), and median follow-up time of 3.5 years (IQR, 2.6-4.2 years). In total, 26 (41%) patellae were Wiberg type A, 29 (46%) were Wiberg type B, and 8 (13%) were Wiberg type C. There were no differences between Wiberg type A versus Wiberg type B versus Wiberg type C groups with respect to change in PROMs from pre- to postoperatively or the percentage of patients who achieved the MCID for IKDC or Kujala scores (P > .05 for all). There were no differences in survival between groups (P = .45).

CONCLUSION

Wiberg patellar type has no effect on patient-reported outcomes or graft survival at midterm follow-up. Patellar dysplasia should not be seen as a contraindication for cell-based cartilage repair procedures.

Good clinical outcomes after patellar cartilage repair with no evidence for inferior results in complex cases with the need for additional patellofemoral realignment procedures: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Focal, patellar cartilage defects are a challenging problem as most cases have an underlying multifactorial pathogenesis. This systematic review of current literature analysed clinical results after regenerative cartilage repair of the patella with a special focus on the assessment and treatment of existing patellofemoral malalignment.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to identify articles reporting clinical results after cartilage regenerative surgeries of the patella using the PubMed and Scopus database. The extracted data included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) and whether cartilage repair was performed alone or in combination with concomitant surgeries of underlying patellofemoral co-pathologies. In cases of isolated cartilage repair, specific exclusion criteria regarding underlying co-pathologies were screened. In cases of concomitant surgeries, the type of surgeries and their specific indications were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 35 original articles were included out of which 27 (77%) were cohort studies with level IV evidence. The most frequently used technique for cartilage restoration of the patella was autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). Results after isolated cartilage repair alone were reported by 15 (43%) studies. Of those studies, 9 (60%) excluded patients with underlying patellofemoral malalignment a priori and 6 (40%) did not analyse underlying co-pathologies at all. Among the studies including combined surgeries, the most frequently reported concomitant procedures were release of the lateral retinaculum, reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), and osteotomy of the tibial tubercle. In summary, these studies showed lower preoperative PROMS but similar final PROMS in comparison with the studies reporting on isolated cartilage repair. The most frequently used PROMS were the IKDC-, Lysholm- and the Modified Cincinnati Score.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive literature review demonstrated good clinical outcomes after patellar cartilage repair with no evidence of minor results even in complex cases with the need for additional patellofemoral realignment procedures. However, a meaningful statistical comparison between isolated patellar cartilage repair and combined co-procedures is not possible due to very heterogeneous patient cohorts and a lack of analysis of specific subgroups in recent literature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Editorial Commentary: Trochlear Dysplasia: Can We Change its Natural History or Degenerative Prognosis?

Trochlear dysplasia may be asymptomatic and benign, or could engender patellar instability and degenerative arthritis. Autologous chondrocyte implantation is demonstrating promising outcomes for the treatment of patellofemoral cartilage lesions, but may not suffice for knees with underlying mechanical anomalies as trochlear dysplasia, where adjuvant trochleoplasty or tibial tubercle osteotomy may be required to prevent patellofemoral instability and to protect the graft from wear and damage. Rigorous radiographic assessment is important to discern the type of dysplasia, notably the presence of a potentially pathogenic supra-trochlear spur. Trochleoplasty or other realignment procedures such as tibial tubercle osteotomy should be considered where necessary to correct underlying trochlear deformities and thereby avoid iatrogenic complications or failure.