The Effect of Combined Anterolateral and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Reducing Pivot Shift Rate and Clinical Outcomes: A Meta-analysis

Comparison of ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction With Isolated ACL Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft: Outcomes in Young Female Patients With High-Grade Pivot Shift

Background

Inferior return to sports (RTS) and functional outcomes have been reported in women after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose was to evaluate the results of combined ACLR and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) in young women with a high-grade pivot shift (grade ≥2). It was hypothesized that combined ACLR and ALLR would result in better RTS and rotational stability than isolated ACLR.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Two groups were retrospectively evaluated and compared. Group I (n = 39; mean age, 31.1 ± 5.7 years) underwent isolated ACLR using hamstring autografts; group C (n = 39; mean age, 30.4 ± 6.1 years) underwent combined ACLR and ALLR. Subjective outcome measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form, Lysholm, Tegner, and ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI). Objective tests included a KT-2000 arthrometer stress test, a pivot-shift test, an isokinetic strength test, a Y-balance test, and a single-leg hop test. A postoperative questionnaire was administered to determine the rates and types of RTS, quality of sports performance, and reinjury and satisfaction rates. Subjective scores and clinical tests were performed at 2 years. Magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy were conducted during the 1- and 2-year follow-ups, respectively.

Results

The mean follow-up for groups I and C were 30.4 ± 3.9 and 29.3 ± 3.5 months, respectively (P = .194). Patients in group C had better anteroposterior (P = .001) and rotational (P = .005) stability and higher ACL-RSI scores (P = .025) than those in group I. Group C had higher composite and posteromedial reach scores on the Y-balance test than group I (P = .014 and P = .010, respectively). A total of 26 (66.7%) patients in group C and 17 (43.6%) in group I returned to their prior level of sports (P = .040). Rerupture of the ACL graft and contralateral ACL rupture occurred in 2 (5.1%) and 2 (5.1%) patients in group I, respectively, compared with no rerupture or contralateral ACL rupture in group C.

Conclusion

Combined ACLR and ALLR in young women with a high-grade pivot shift was associated with better knee stability parameters, dynamic postural stability, and psychological readiness to RTS than isolated ACLR.

Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis With the Iliotibial Band Strip Fixed on the Femoral Cortical Surface Reduces Laxity and Causes Less Overconstraint in the Anterolateral Lesioned Knee: A Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

To compare the biomechanical effects of femoral cortical surface fixation and intra-tunnel fixation in modified Lemaire tenodesis on the restoration of native kinematics in anterolateral structure-deficient knees.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were mounted in a knee-customized jig to evaluate anterior translation in anterior load and internal rotation degree in internal rotation torque at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°, as well as anterolateral translation (ALT) in a simulated pivot-shift test at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45°. Kinematic tests were performed in the following states: intact; anterolateral knee lesion (AL-Les); modified Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) with the femoral iliotibial band (ITB) strip fixed on the cortical surface (cortical fixation), deep to the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) (deep LET-C); and LET with the femoral ITB strip fixed into a tunnel (intra-tunnel fixation), deep to the LCL (deep LET-IT) or superficial to the LCL (superficial LET-IT). The knee kinematic changes in the AL-Les state and the 3 LET states were compared with each other, with the intact state as the baseline.

RESULTS

In the AL-Les state, the increased anterior translation instabilities were significantly mitigated by the 3 LETs at 30°, 60°, and 90° (all P < .001), with overconstraint observed in both the deep LET-IT and superficial LET-IT states at 60° (P = .047 and P < .001, respectively) and 90° (both P < .001). Similarly, the 3 LETs significantly reduced the internal rotation instabilities in the AL-Les state at all flexion angles. The superficial LET-IT state overconstrained the knee at 60° (P = .009) and 90° (P < .001) during internal rotation torque, and the deep LET-IT state did so at 60° (P = .012). Furthermore, the ALT instabilities found in the AL-Les state were significantly reduced by the 3 LETs during the simulated pivot-shift test. At 30° and 45°, these LET states resulted in overconstraint when compared with the intact state, but the superficial LET-IT state (P < .001) or deep LET-IT state (P = .016) presented a larger overconstraint than that in the deep LET-C at 45°, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3 Lemaire LET procedures evaluated reduced the anterior, internal rotational, and ALT laxities in AL-Les knees and restored these parameters to the native baseline of the intact state at most flexion angles. However, in deep flexion, some overconstraint occurred in all LETs when compared with the intact state, of which the deep LET-C state resulted in less overconstraint in anterior translation and internal rotation than the deep LET-IT and superficial LET-IT states.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This biomechanical study supports using the femoral cortical fixation technique to fix the ITB strip in the modified Lemaire LET, which similarly improves knee kinematic stability and causes less overconstraint compared with conventional intra-tunnel fixation. These findings need more verification in clinical scenarios.

The anterolateral capsule is infrequently damaged as evaluated arthroscopically in patients undergoing anatomic ACL reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

Concomitant anterolateral complex (ALC) injury may contribute to persistent rotatory knee instability following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. There is no consensus on how to best identify concomitant ALC injury preoperatively, nor how well ALC injury identified on imaging modalities correlates with clinical examination of knee instability. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the incidence of concomitant ALC injury in ACL-injured knees, as determined by arthroscopy to preoperative radiography, ultrasound, and MRI.

METHODS

A total of 117 patients with a unilateral primary ACL injury who underwent individualized anatomic ACLR between June 2016 and May 2019 were enrolled. Preoperative imaging modalities, including X-ray, ultrasound, and MRI, were evaluated for concomitant ALC injury. Clinical examination under anesthesia, including the anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot shift tests were performed. Anterolateral capsule injury, as defined by hemorrhage and/or capsular tearing on diagnostic arthroscopy, was also determined. Correlative analyses of ALC injury incidence and severity were performed across imaging modalities and against clinical examination grades.

RESULTS

ALC injury incidence across imaging modalities was as follows: X-ray (3%), arthroscopy (19%), MRI (53%), and US (63%). The ALC injury rate on arthroscopy was significantly less than MRI (p < 0.001) or ultrasound (p < 0.001). ALC injury incidence and severity were significantly correlated between MRI and US grading scales (p = 0.02), but no correlations among other imaging modalities were found. Similarly, no imaging modality meaningfully correlated with physical examination maneuvers.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of ALC injury varies across imaging modalities, with lower injury rates found on arthroscopy (19%) compared to MRI (53%) and US (63%). Increasing ALC injury severity grades on imaging does not predict increasing anterolateral knee laxity on clinical examination.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V, retrospective case series.

High-grade pivot-shift phenomenon after anterior cruciate ligament injury is associated with asymmetry of lateral and medial compartment anterior tibial translation and lateral meniscus posterior horn tears

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon is associated with asymmetry of the lateral and medial compartment anterior tibial translation (L-ATT and M-ATT) and lateral meniscus posterior horn (LMPH) tears in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 192 consecutive patients who had complete ACL injuries between January 2019 and December 2020. Among these, 156 met the inclusion criteria. L-ATT and M-ATT were measured using preoperative weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the differences between L-ATT and M-ATT were calculated. Thirty-five patients who demonstrated excessive differences in L-ATT and M-ATT (> 6.0 mm) were regarded as asymmetric (study group), and 36 patients with minimal or no differences in L-ATT and M-ATT (< 3.0 mm) were allocated to the control group. Demographic data, grade of the pivot-shift test, integrality of LMPH, and medial meniscus posterior horn (MMPH) were compared between the groups. Moreover, predictors of high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon, including asymmetry of L-ATT and M-ATT, integrity of LMPH and MMPH, time from injury to surgery, sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The difference between L-ATT and M-ATT in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (mean ± SD: 8.4 ± 2.1 mm vs. 1.5 ± 1.0 mm, P < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients with high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon (2 + and 3 +) and LMPH tears were identified in the study group (high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon: 25/35 vs. 13/36, P = 0.003; LMPH tears: 18/35 vs. 5/36, P = 0.001). Additionally, asymmetry of L-ATT, M-ATT (odds ratio 5.8; 95% CI 1.7-19.8; P = 0.005), and LMPH tears (odds ratio 3.8; 95% CI 1.3-11.6; P = 0.018) were found to be good predictors of the high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon after ACL injury, whereas MMPH tears, time from injury to surgery, sex, age, and BMI were not.

CONCLUSION

In patients with ACL injury, the high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon is associated with asymmetry between L-ATT and M-ATT, and LMPH tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

A Review of Current Concepts of the Anterolateral Complex of the Knee

The anterolateral complex (ALC) of the knee has gained increased interest over the last decades due to the high revision rates of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Furthermore, in patients with an ACL tear, the injury of at least one of the ALC's anatomic structures has been shown to be significantly higher, thus affecting its secondary stabilizing role at the knee joint. As such, ACLR augmentation techniques, that embrace the ALC, have been proposed recently, and indications for these procedures are still evolving. This review aims to present and discuss the most current anatomical, biomechanical, and imaging data, current reconstruction techniques, and the clinical results of ALC reconstruction.

Anterolateral Structure Reconstructions With Different Tibial Attachment Sites Similarly Improve Tibiofemoral Kinematics and Result in Different Graft Force in Treating Knee Anterolateral Instability

PURPOSE

To compare the biomechanical effects of anterolateral structure reconstructions (ALSRs) with different tibial attachments on tibiofemoral kinematics and anterolateral structure (ALS) graft forces.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric knees were tested in a customized knee testing system, using a novel pulley system to simulate more muscle tensions by loading the iliotibial band at 30 N and quadriceps at 10 N in all testing states. Anterior stability during anterior load and anterolateral rotatory stability during 2 simulated pivot-shift tests (PST1 and PST2) were evaluated in 5 states: intact, ALS-deficient (Def), ALSR-Ta (anterior tibial site), ALSR-Tm (middle tibial site), and ALSR-Tp (posterior tibial site). Tibiofemoral kinematics and resulting ALS graft forces against the applied loads were measured and compared in the corresponding states.

RESULTS

In anterior load, 3 ALSRs mitigated the anterior laxities of the ALS Def state at all degrees, which were close to intact state at 0° and 30° but showed significantly overconstraints at 60° and 90°. In both PSTs, all ALSRs significantly reduced the anterolateral rotatory instability of ALS Def, whereas the significant overconstraints were detected in ALSR-Ta and ALSR-Tm at greater knee flexion angles. All ALS grafts carried forces in resisting anterior and pivot-shift loads. Only ALS graft force in ALSR-Ta increased continuously with knee flexion angles. The ALS graft forces carried by ALSR-Ta were significantly larger than those by ALSR-Tp and ALSR-Tm when resisting anterior load and PSTs at greater knee flexion angles.

CONCLUSIONS

ALSRs with different tibial attachment sites similarly restored knee laxities close to the native tibiofemoral kinematics in an ALS-deficient knee, whereas the ALSR-Tp showed less propensity for overconstraining the knee at greater flexion angles. The ALS graft in ALSR-Ta carried more forces than those in ALSR-Tp and ALSR-Tm against simulated loads.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Altering the tibial attachment sites of ALSRs may not significantly affect tibiofemoral kinematics at most degrees whereas the posterior may have less overconstraints at greater flexion angles. However, ALS graft positioning at a more anterior tibial attachment site may carry more forces in resisting anterior and pivot-shift loads.

Latin American formal consensus on the appropriate indications of extra-articular lateral procedures in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

To create a practice guideline for the appropriate indications of an extra-articular procedure in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

The formal consensus method described by the Haute Autorité de Santé was used. The Latin American Society of Arthroscopy, Articular Replacement, and Sports Injuries (SLARD) recruited three groups of experts on ACLR. Initially, the steering group, consisting of eight surgeons, performed a systematic review of the literature and elaborated on 192 scenarios for primary ACLR. The rating group, composed of 23 surgeons, rated each scenario in two rounds, with an in-between in-person meeting for discussion. Median scores and agreement levels were estimated to classify each scenario as inappropriate, uncertain or appropriate for adding anterolateral reconstruction. Finally, the lecture group, consisting of 10 surgeons, revised each stage of the method, results and interpretation.

RESULTS

Of the scenarios, 11.97% were rated as appropriate for adding an extra-articular lateral procedure, 7.81% as inappropriate and 80.21% as uncertain. The key recommendations for the addition of extra-articular lateral techniques were as follows: it is appropriate when the patient is under 25 years of age, has high-grade physical examination findings, practises a pivoting sport and has hyperlaxity; meanwhile, it is inappropriate when the patient has low-grade physical examination findings, has normal laxity and does not practise a pivoting sport.

CONCLUSIONS

The appropriate indications of extra-articular lateral procedures in primary ACLR were determined on the basis of the best available evidence and expert opinion following a formal consensus method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with lateral extra-articular tenodesis reduces knee rotation laxity and graft failure rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine whether the addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) reduces rotational laxity of the knee, and to compare the clinical results of this treatment with those of ACLR alone.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched by two researchers for clinical studies comparing ACLR with and without LET. Studies with only evidence levels I and II and studies in which anterior lateral ligament reconstruction was performed with grafts were excluded. The risk of bias of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias and modified Downs & Black tools. The outcomes included (1) functional outcomes; (2) knee laxity measures; (3) knee injury osteoarthritis and outcome score; and (4) complications. The outcomes of the two groups were extracted, summarized and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 234 studies were retrieved and 223 were excluded. Eleven clinical studies with 1745 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Compared to the patients who underwent ACLR alone, the patients who underwent ACLR with LET had reduced pivot-shift (odds ratio [OR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31 to 0.74, p = 0.0009), and lower graft failure rate (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.55, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with ACLR only, ACLR combined with LET can effectively reduce rotation laxity of the knee joint, and reduce the graft failure rate in high-risk patients. However, the effects on the function and activity level of patients cannot be confirmed.

Augmentation of Anterolateral Structures of the Knee Causes Undesirable Tibiofemoral Cartilage Contact in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-A Randomized In-Vivo Biomechanics Study

PURPOSE

To analyze the in vivo tibiofemoral cartilage contact patterns in knees undergoing double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction(DB-ACLR) with or without anterolateral structure augmentation (ALSA).

METHODS

Twenty patients with an ACL-ruptured knee and a healthy contralateral side were included. Nine patients received an isolated DB-ACLR (DB-ACLR group), and 11 patients had a DB-ACLR with ALSA (DB+ALSA group). At 1-year follow-up, a combined computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and dual fluoroscopy imaging system analysis was used to capture a single-legged lunge of both the operated and healthy contralateral side. Tibiofemoral contact points (CPs) of the medial and lateral compartments were compared. CP locations were expressed as anteroposterior (AP, +/-) and medial-lateral (ML, -/+) values according to the tibia.

RESULTS

In the DB-ACLR knees, no significant differences were found in CPs when compared with the healthy contralateral knees (P ≥ .31). However, in the DB+ALSA knees, the CPs in the lateral compartment had a significantly more anterior (mean AP: operative, -2.8 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.0 to-0.7 vs healthy, -5.0 mm, 95% CI -6.7 to -3.2; P = .006) and lateral (mean ML: operative, 23.2 mm, 95% CI 21.9-24.5 vs healthy, 21.8 mm, 95% CI 20.2-23.3; P = .013) location. The CPs in the medial compartment were located significantly more posterior (mean AP: operative, -3.4, 95% CI -5.0 to -1.9 vs healthy, -1.3, 95% CI -2.6 to -0.1; P = .006) and lateral (mean ML: operative, -21.3, 95% CI -22.6 to -20.0 vs healthy, -22.6, 95% CI -24.2 to -21.0; P = .021).

CONCLUSIONS

DB-ACLR restored the tibiofemoral cartilage contact mechanics to near-normal values at 1-year follow-up. Adding the ALSA to the DB-ACLR resulted in significantly altered tibiofemoral cartilage contact locations in both the medial and lateral compartments.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In DB-ACLR knees, the addition of an ALSA may be unfavorable as it caused significantly changed arthrokinematics.

Tibial internal rotation in combined anterior cruciate ligament and high-grade anterolateral ligament injury and its influence on ACL length

Background

Assessment of combined anterolateral ligament (ALL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury remains challenging but of high importance as the ALL is a contributing stabilizer of tibial internal rotation. The effect of preoperative static tibial internal rotation on ACL -length remains unknown. The aim of the study was analyze the effect of tibial internal rotation on ACL length in single-bundle ACL reconstructions and to quantify tibial internal rotation in combined ACL and ALL injuries.

Methods

The effect of tibial internal rotation on ACL length was computed in a three-dimensional (3D) model of 10 healthy knees with 5° increments of tibial internal rotation from 0 to 30° resulting in 70 simulations. For each step ACL length was measured. ALL injury severity was graded by a blinded musculoskeletal radiologist in a retrospective analysis of 61 patients who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Preoperative tibial internal rotation was measured in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its diagnostic performance was analyzed.

Results

ACL length linearly increased 0.7 ± 0.1 mm (2.1 ± 0.5% of initial length) per 5° of tibial internal rotation from 0 to 30° in each patient.

Seventeen patients (27.9%) had an intact ALL (grade 0), 10 (16.4%) a grade 1, 21 (34.4%) a grade 2 and 13 (21.3%) a grade 3 injury of the ALL. Patients with a combined ACL and ALL injury grade 3 had a median static tibial internal rotation of 8.8° (interquartile range (IQR): 8.3) compared to 5.6° (IQR: 6.6) in patients with an ALL injury (grade 0–2) (p = 0.03). A cut-off > 13.3° of tibial internal rotation predicted a high-grade ALL injury with a specificity of 92%, a sensitivity of 30%; area under the curve (AUC) 0.70 (95% CI: 0.54–0.85) (p = 0.03) and an accuracy of 79%.

Conclusion

ACL length linearly increases with tibial internal rotation from 0 to 30°. A combined ACL and high-grade ALL injury was associated with greater preoperative tibial internal rotation. This potentially contributes to unintentional graft laxity in ACL reconstructed patients, in particular with concomitant high-grade ALL tears.

Study design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05218-8.

Anterolateral Structure Reconstruction Similarly Improves the Stability and Causes Less Overconstraint in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knees Compared With Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

To compare the kinematics of anterolateral structure (ALS) reconstruction (ALSR) and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in ACL-ALS-deficient knees with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees with the following conditions were tested: (1) intact, (2) ACL-ALS deficiency, (3) ACL reconstruction (ACLR), (4) ACLR combined with ALSR (ACL-ALSR) or LET (ACLR+LET). Anterior translation and tibial internal rotation were measured with 90-N anterior load and 5 N·m internal torque at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°. The anterolateral translation and internal rotation were also measured during a simulated pivot-shift test at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45°. The knee kinematic changes in all reconstructions were compared with each other, with intact knees as the baseline.

RESULTS

Isolated ACLR failed to restore native knee kinematics in ACL-ALS-deficient knees. Both ACL-ALSR and ACLR+LET procedures decreased the anterior instability of the ACLR. However, ACLR+LET caused overconstraints in internal rotation at 30° (-3.73° ± 2.60°, P = .023), 60° (-4.96° ± 2.22°, P = .001) and 90° (-6.14° ± 1.60°, P < .001). ACL-ALSR also overconstrained the knee at 60° (-3.65° ± 1.90°, P < .001) and 90° (-3.18° ± 2.53°, P < .001). For a simulated pivot-shift test, both combined procedures significantly reduced the ACLR instability, with anterolateral translation and internal rotation being overconstrained in ACLR+LET at 30° (-3.32 mm ± 3.89 mm, P = .005; -2.58° ± 1.61°, P < .001) and 45° (-3.02 mm ± 3.95 mm, P = .012; -3.44° ± 2.86°, P < .001). However, the ACL-ALSR overconstrained only the anterolateral translation at 30° (-1.51 mm ± 2.39 mm, P = .046) and internal rotation at 45° (-2.09° ± 1.70°, P < .001). There were no significant differences between the two combined procedures at most testing degrees in each testing state, except for the internal rotation at 30° (P = .007) and 90° (P = .032) in internal rotation torque.

CONCLUSION

ACL reconstruction alone did not restore intact knee kinematics in knees with concurrent ACL tears and severe ALS injury (ACL-ALS-deficient status). Both ACL-ALSR and ACLR+LET procedures restored knee stability at some flexion degrees, with less overconstraints in internal rotation resulting from ACL-ALSR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

For patients with combined ACL tears and severe ALS deficiency, isolated ACLR probably results in residual rotational and pivot-shift instability. Both ACL-ALSR and ACLR+LET show promise for the improvement of knee stability, whereas ACL-ALSR has less propensity for knee overconstraint.

Clinical outcomes of combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with combined reconstruction of the ACL and anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee.

METHODS

A search was conducted on the PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases, in line with the PRISMA protocol. The indexation terms used were "anterior cruciate ligament" OR "acl" AND "anterolateral ligament" AND "reconstruction." Articles that compared patients submitted to combined ACL and ALL reconstruction with those submitted to isolated reconstruction of the ACL, with levels of evidence I, II, and III, were included. Studies with follow-up of less than 2 years and articles that did not use "anatomical" techniques for ALL reconstruction, such as extraarticular tenodesis, were excluded. A meta-analysis with R software was conducted, with a random effects model, presented as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence level (CI) and statistically significant at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Ten articles were selected, with a total of 1495 patients, most of whom were men, of whom 674 submitted to ACL and ALL reconstruction and 821 to isolated ACL reconstruction. Combined ACL and ALL reconstruction exhibited a statistically significant advantage in residual pivot shift (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.24-0.47, I² = 0%, p < 0.01), rerupture rate (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.19-0.62, I² = 0%, p < 0.01), Lachman test (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.86, I² = 21%, p < 0.01), and postoperative Lysholm score (MD 2.28, CI 95% 0.75-3.81, I² = 73%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined ACL and ALL reconstruction obtained better postoperative clinical outcomes when compared with isolated ACL reconstruction, especially in reducing residual pivot shift and rerupture rate.

[Consequences of anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a systematic umbrella review]

INTRODUCTION

 The treatment of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture is still controversial. In particular, this applies to the question of conservative versus surgical treatment. The answer to this question is often based on consequential damage such as the development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis, secondary damage to the meniscus or cartilage, and participation in sports. If there are significant differences in these parameters between the individual treatment options, the results will be of great importance for the development of evidence-based treatment pathways. Therefore, the aim of this work was to evaluate the development of knee osteoarthritis after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament and the corresponding treatment (conservative or surgical).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 To answer the above question, a systematic literature search was conducted in Medline via Pubmed, the Cochrane Library and in CINAHL. Only systematic reviews with a minimum follow-up period of 10 years were included. The search was conducted in January 2020 and updated in January 2021. Investigated cohorts included patients with a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament who had undergone either conservative or surgical treatment. Osteoarthritis was diagnosed either radiologically (recognized scores) or clinically (pain and impaired function). Appropriate reviews were qualitatively evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 questionnaire.

RESULTS

 The literature research initially identified n = 42 reviews from which 14 reviews were included. After full-text review and qualitative evaluation, only n = 2 systematic reviews remained for evaluation. The results of both papers show imprecise data with a high variability. However, it can be assumed with high probability that the development of osteoarthritis of the knee is increased after a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. There is no evidence that the incidence of joint degeneration may be reduced by reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, nor is there a difference when comparing conservative and surgical treatment directly.

CONCLUSION

 Patients with an anterior cruciate ligament rupture are likely to be at a greater risk of developing progressive joint degeneration. A protective effect of cruciate ligament surgery has not been found in the evaluated studies. A general argument in favour of cruciate ligament surgery aiming to achieve a protective effect on hyaline articular cartilage seems obsolete based on the results and should therefore not be used in patient education in the future.

Clinical outcomes of contemporary lateral augmentation techniques in primary ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this investigation was to systematically review the contemporary literature to determine if a lateral augmentation (LA) added to an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) provides better clinical and patient reported outcomes compared to an isolated ACLR.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Two authors independently conducted an electronic search using MEDLINE® and Embase® on February 6^th, 2021 for level I-III randomized controlled trials (RCT) and prospective cohort studies without randomization, published after 2012 and with a minimum of two year follow-up. Publications were included when they reported on the objective knee stability examination, patient reported outcome scores, return to sports or graft rupture rate of any type of primary, isolated ACLR compared to ACLR combined with any type of LA.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies that reported on a combined total of 1892 unique patients were eligible for data extraction, including five RCTs and six prospective cohort studies. In 6 studies, an Anterolateral Ligament reconstruction (ALLR) was the LA of choice, while the 5 other publications used different types of Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis (LET). A significant reduction in graft ruptures was found in patients treated with ACLR + LA (3%) compared to isolated ACLR (12%). Rotational laxity was significantly higher in isolated ACLR (14%) compared to ACLR + LA (6%). Addition of a LA reduced anterior translation when assessed via instrumented laxity testing. No significant difference was found in the patient reported outcome scores (IKDC and Tegner) between both patient groups, except for the Lysholm Score which was significant in favour of the ACLR + LA group.

CONCLUSION

Combination of a primary ACLR with a LA can significantly reduce the risk of graft rupture and provide better rotatory stability, without jeopardizing patient reported outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Systematic Review of Level I, II and III studies.

Editorial Commentary: Timing of the Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: Still a Debatable Issue

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries frequently occur as the results of twisting injury of the knee. Accompanying damages to other structures at the time of injury determine the severity of the injury, subsequent surgical procedures, and hence, clinical outcomes. Anterolateral ligament (ALL) seems to act as a side-bar of the ACL rather than a major ligament that should be reconstructed separately. We should also consider the pros and cons of the adding ALL reconstruction procedures. There is insufficient evidence that can either support or refute that ALL plays an important role for knee stability. Determining the timing of the combined reconstruction is still a debatable issue, just like the efficacy of combined ACL and ALL reconstruction.

Editorial Commentary: Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Results in Better Stability After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction for Patients With High-Grade Pivot Shifts

Magnetic resonance imaging of the torn anterior lateral ligament (ALL) is inconsistent and subject to significant intra- and interobserver variability. Like that of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), an ALL tear can vary in degree (first, second, or third) and location (tibial or femoral side). These variations may impact the appropriate surgical intervention. Relevant biomechanical data indicate that the deep iliotibial band fibers are more important than the ALL in controlling pivot shift. Lateral compartment overconstraint after ALL reconstruction does not appear to be a biomechanical or clinical issue. An ALL reconstruction creates a nonisometric construct (tight in extension and lax in flexion), allowing physiologic internal tibial rotation at 90° flexion, whereas lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is more isometric, limiting physiologic internal tibial rotation at 90° flexion. The indications for a combined ACL/ALL reconstruction are evolving, but a Segond fracture and ligamentous hyperlaxity of ≥5 using the modified Beighton system seem reasonable. An ACL/LET reconstruction results in better stability for patients with high-grade pivot shifts.