Allograft Bone Dowels Show Better Incorporation in Femoral Versus Tibial Tunnels in 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Computed Tomography-Based Analysis

Management of Bone Loss and Tunnel Widening in Revision ACL Reconstruction

➤ Both mechanical and biological factors can contribute to bone loss and tunnel widening following primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.➤ Revision ACL surgery success is dependent on graft position, fixation, and biological incorporation.➤ Both 1-stage and 2-stage revision ACL reconstructions can be successful in correctly indicated patients.➤ Potential future solutions may involve the incorporation of biological agents to enhance revision ACL surgery, including the use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate, platelet-rich plasma, and bone morphogenetic protein-2.

Consistent Indications and Good Outcomes Despite High Variability in Techniques for Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the current literature regarding the indications, techniques, and outcomes after 2-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

A literature search was performed using SCOPUS, PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses statement. Inclusion criteria was limited to Level I-IV human studies reporting on indications, surgical techniques, imaging, and/or clinical outcomes of 2-stage revision ACLR.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 355 patients treated with 2-stage revision ACLR were identified. The most commonly reported indications were tunnel malposition and tunnel widening, with knee instability being the most common symptomatic indication. Tunnel diameter threshold for 2-stage reconstruction ranged from 10 to 14 mm. The most common grafts used for primary ACLR were bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, hamstring graft, and LARS (polyethylene terephthalate) synthetic graft. The time elapsed from primary ACLR to the first stage surgery ranged from 1.7 years to 9.7 years, whereas the time elapsed between the first and second stage ranged from 21 weeks to 13.6 months. Six different bone grafting options were reported, with the most common being iliac crest autograft, allograft bone dowels, and allograft bone chips. During definitive reconstruction, hamstring autograft and BPTB autograft were the most commonly used grafts. Studies reporting patient-reported outcome measures showed improvement from preoperative to postoperative levels in Lysholm, Tegner, and objective International Knee and Documentation Committee scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Tunnel malpositioning and widening remain the most common indications for 2-stage revision ACLR. Bone grafting is commonly reported using iliac crest autograft and allograft bone chips and dowels, whereas hamstring autograft and BPTB autograft were the most used grafts during the second-stage definitive reconstruction. Studies showed improvements from preoperative to postoperative levels in commonly used patient reported outcomes measures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I, III, and IV studies.

Bone-ACL-bone allograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Short-term evaluation in a rabbit model with microcomputed tomography

The standard grafts used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are tendon, either patellar tendon, hamstring, or quadriceps. However, the microstructure and composition of tendon differs from ligament. Ideally, the ACL would be replaced with the same tissue. To evaluate the incorporation of a bone-ACL-bone (B-ACL-B) graft for ACL reconstruction, we performed a controlled laboratory study in a rabbit model with microcomputed tomography (μCT). Forty-six New Zealand white rabbits were used, with 17 donor rabbits to harvest bilateral B-ACL-B allografts and 29 rabbits undergoing unilateral ACL reconstruction with B-ACL-B allograft. Knee specimens were collected for biomechanical testing (n = 14) at 4 and 8 weeks and for μCT analysis (n = 15) at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after surgery. Gross inspection and μCT examination confirmed bone blocks in the appropriate anatomic position. Biomechanical tests revealed no difference in mean load-to-failure force for B-ACL-B allografts between 4 and 8 weeks. Progressive healing occurred between the bone block and the tunnel as demonstrated by a gradual increase on average bone-volume fraction and total mineral density (TMD) in both femoral and tibial tunnels. Remodeling of the bone block was evidenced by a significant decrease in TMD of both tibial and femoral bone blocks. This is a report of a novel rabbit B-ACL-B allograft reconstruction model demonstrating early signs of graft remodeling and incorporation. Clinical Relevance: This study demonstrates ACL reconstruction using an anatomically matched ACL allograft, rather than a tendon graft, may be possible based on early findings in this lapine model.

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone Dowels

Background:

Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is technically challenging and may require the use of bone dowels in either 1 or 2 stages.

Indications:

The indications for bone dowels include tibial or femoral tunnel malposition or widening of the tunnels. In the patient case, the tibial tunnel aperture was positioned far medial to the native ACL insertion with a horizontal tunnel trajectory and the femoral tunnel was vertical. In addition, there was tunnel widening to 12 mm of both tibial and femoral tunnels.

Technique Description:

A bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft was harvested and diagnostic arthroscopy was performed. The previous tibial tunnel was sequentially reamed from 8 to 12 mm to adequately overdrill the previous widened tunnel. Next, the femoral tunnel was reamed to 12 mm in similar fashion. Using a tamp and guide pin, a 12 × 30-mm allograft bone dowel was then malleted into the femoral tunnel until it was flush with the medial aspect of the lateral femoral condyle. Another 12 × 30-mm bone dowel was then advanced into the tibial tunnel until it was just below the native articular margin. With the bone dowels securely in place, the ACL reconstruction using the harvested bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft was performed.

Results:

Werner et al reported a study of 12 patients who had excellent incorporation of femoral tunnel allograft bone dowels and comparable objective and subjective scoring to 2-stage techniques. Dragoo et al reported a study of 18 patients with tibial tunnel allograft bone dowels that demonstrated significant increases in patient-reported outcome measures and a significant decrease in tunnel widening.

Discussion/Conclusion:

Revision ACL reconstruction may require bone dowels if there are malpositioned tunnels or if there is tunnel widening. Overall, the literature demonstrates that 1-stage revision outcomes have been comparable to reported 2-stage revision outcomes, both of which are satisfactory.

Bone Grafting Technique in Revision ACL Reconstruction: Coring Reamer and Dowel Trick

One- or two-staged bone grafting is sometimes required for tunnel malposition and/or tunnel widening in revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The aim of this procedure is to restore the correct position of the ACL graft in the revision setting to provide a stable and functional ACL, thereby reproducing normal knee kinematics. We present a technique that allows for a cost-effective, convenient tunnel grafting of a femoral head allograft bone dowel into both femoral and tibial defects in revision ACL reconstruction.

Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Cannulated Allograft Bone Dowels Soaked in Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is one of the most common orthopedic procedures performed each year. The majority of patients undergoing these reconstructions will experience long-term stability and symptomatic relief; however, some will require a revision ACLR procedure. In general, revision ACLRs are more challenging than primary ACLRs due to several diagnostic and technical considerations. A revision ACLR can be performed with either a one-stage or two-stage procedure, which is based on the presence or absence of malpositioned tunnels, bone loss, and tunnel expansion. Recently, the introduction of preshaped allograft bone dowels as a bone grafting option has gained popularity. They provide immediate structural stability and avoid donor site morbidity associated with autografts. The purpose of this article is to outline a bone-grafting tunnel technique with cannulated allograft bone dowels soaked in bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) used in the first stage of a staged revision ACLR procedure.