A Single Injection of Amniotic Suspension Allograft Is Safe and Effective for Treatment of Mild to Moderate Hip Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Study

Effect of amniotic suspension allograft in a rat destabilization of medial meniscus osteoarthritis model

Placental-derived allografts have been of interest as a potential nonsurgical treatment to reduce pain and improve function in knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of single and repeat injection of amniotic suspension allograft (ASA) on pain, function, and cytokine levels using a destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) rat model of OA. Post-DMM surgery, animals were treated with a single injection of either ASA, vehicle, or triamcinolone, or repeated injection of either ASA or vehicle. Behavioral testing including knee swelling, pain threshold, dynamic weight bearing (DWB), and gait analysis were evaluated during the in-life phase. Postsacrifice, histopathology and serum and synovial fluid analyses were evaluated. Significant improvements in both DWB differentials and pain threshold were seen in response to repeated injection of ASA, while a single injection of ASA and triamcinolone resulted in significant improvements in pain threshold. Histopathology analysis found no significant differences regardless of treatment compared to vehicle, except for an increase in synovitis following repeated injection of ASA. A single injection of ASA and triamcinolone resulted in increased anti-inflammatory cytokines; repeated ASA injection resulted in significant increases in several immune-modulating factors relevant to OA. When comparing the impact of single and repeat ASA treatments on behavioral testing, repeated injection provided significant additional improvements in both pain and function. This study provides evidence demonstrating the impact of a second injection while also providing additional data for evaluating the use of ASA as a nonsurgical treatment for knee OA.

Allogenic Perinatal Tissue for Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine Applications: A Systematic Review

Producing tremendous amounts of stress and financial burden on the global patient population and healthcare systems around the world, most current modalities of treatment for musculoskeletal ailments often do not address the etiopathogenetic causes of these disorders. Regenerative medicine for musculoskeletal disorders relies on orthobiologics derived from either allogenic or autologous sources. Multiple drawbacks are associated with autologous sources, including donor-site morbidity, a dearth of studies, and variability in both patient reported and clinical/functional outcomes. On the other hand, allogenic sources address several of these concerns, and continue to be a suitable source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). This review qualitatively reports both the preclinical and clinical outcomes of publications studying the applications of umbilical cord (-derived Wharton's jelly), amniotic suspension allograft, amniotic membrane, and amniotic fluid in musculoskeletal medicine. A systematic review was conducted utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines on studies published between January 2010 and October 2022 that used allogeneic perinatal tissues. Further randomized controlled clinical studies are necessary to properly evaluate the safety and efficacy of these tissues in orthopedic surgery.

Cell-Free Amniotic Fluid and Regenerative Medicine: Current Applications and Future Opportunities

Amniotic fluid (AF) provides critical biological and physical support for the developing fetus. While AF is an excellent source of progenitor cells with regenerative properties, recent investigations indicate that cell-free AF (cfAF), which consists of its soluble components and extracellular vesicles, can also stimulate regenerative and reparative activities. This review summarizes published fundamental, translational, and clinical investigations into the biological activity and potential use of cfAF as a therapeutic agent. Recurring themes emerge from these studies, which indicate that cfAF can confer immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and pro-growth characteristics to the target cells/tissue with which they come into contact. Another common observation is that cfAF seems to promote a return of cells/tissue to a homeostatic resting state when applied to a model of cell stress or disease. The precise mechanisms through which these effects are mediated have not been entirely defined, but it is clear that cfAF can safely and effectively treat cutaneous wounds and perhaps orthopedic degenerative conditions. Additional applications are currently being investigated, but require further study to dissect the fundamental mechanisms through which its regenerative effects are mediated. By doing so, rational design can be used to fully unlock its potential in the biotechnology lab and in the clinic.

Orthobiologic Injections for the Treatment of Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

The use of orthobiologics is gaining increasing interest as a minimally invasive treatment for hip osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to investigate the evidence about the safety and efficacy of these products. A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. The study quality was assessed using the RoB 2.0 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) for all studies. A total of 20 clinical studies (735 patients) was identified, 12 on PRP injections and eight on cell-based therapies (five from bone marrow, two from adipose tissue, and one from amniotic fluid). The publication trend increased over time, with over 50% of articles published from 2019. The literature analysis showed only six RCTs, all on PRP injections. The mCMS showed an overall fair methodology (mean score 59.4). While the number of studies and their methodology are still limited, the available evidence suggests safety and overall promising results, with the treatment success being inversely proportional to the severity of OA. Further high-level controlled trials are needed before drawing more definitive conclusions on the real potential of orthobiologics for the injective treatment of patients affected by hip OA.

Allogenic Amniotic Tissue for Treatment of Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) impacts millions of people and places a high burden on healthcare systems in the United States. Current treatment modalities have limitations and do not address underlying pathology. Lately, there has been an immense growth in the use of biologics, including perinatal allogenic tissues for orthopedic regenerative medicine applications. Amniotic tissue is an exciting new alternative for such applications. Despite several published studies that reported its use for treatment of ophthalmic conditions and complex wounds, there are limited clinical studies evaluating its safety and efficacy in treating patients suffering with knee or hip OA. In this manuscript, I focused on three prospective clinical studies which evaluated the safety and efficacy of amniotic tissue in patients suffering with moderate knee or hip OA. The results from these studies presented the scientific community with much needed, well-executed, and prospective clinical trials. Though these trials demonstrated that administration of amniotic tissue in knee or hip joint is safe and potentially effective, more multi-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trials are warranted to further establish the efficacy of amniotic tissue to mitigate symptoms of knee and hip OA to ultimately justify its clinical use.

Editorial Commentary: Amniotic Orthopaedic Biologics: There's Hope If We Avoid Hype

Amniotic products donated from mothers having live births have been in use for wound care and other medical uses for many years. Recent developments in regenerative sciences have suggested these products in solution or lyophilized forms may be useful for the treatment of inflammatory diseases such as chronic tendinopathies and osteoarthritis of joints. These products for these indications, however, are deemed human cells, tissues, or cellular or tissue-based products (otherwise known as HCTPs) in the "351" category, meaning that they need to have a biologic license to be marketed and sold in the United States, and to gain this license, one needs to go through the usual rigor of investigational new drug filing and phase 1, 2, and 3 trials to prove safety and efficacy. Although current clinical use of amniotic solution and lyophilized products is on hold through this study period, both basic science and clinical trial studies are building a convincing set of data that suggest broad possibilities for their uses in the future. To date, both animal and human studies have shown that a single injection of amniotic suspension allograft is safe, has not elicited any significant immune response, and has been shown to be effective in several prospective studies and at least one well-controlled randomized controlled human study for knee osteoarthritis when compared with both hyaluronic acid and placebo saline. Proteins in these harvested and processed tissue allografts are anti-inflammatory, anticatabolic, and proanabolic. Appropriate caution by the Food and Drug Administration in granting licenses for these indications should not dissuade basic scientists and physicians from pursuing further research into these interesting products.