Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof (FEAR) Index and Anterior Acetabular Coverage Correlate With Labral Length in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

A Modified Approach to Measuring Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof Index Has Better Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability Compared With the Original Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof Index

PURPOSE

To propose a modified approach to measuring the femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index while still abiding by its definition and biomechanical basis, and to compare the intra- and interobserver reliabilities of the original and the modified FEAR index. To propose a classification for medial sourcil edges.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients treated with periacetabular osteotomy and/or hip arthroscopy at a single institute. Patients with unilateral or bilateral symptomatic borderline hip(s) were included. Hips with remarkable osteoarthritis, deformities, history of previous surgery, or without symptoms were excluded. A modified FEAR index was defined using a best-fit circle to determine the sourcil line and 2 ancillary lines connecting femoral head and sourcil edges to determine epiphyseal line. Lateral center-edge angle, Sharp angle, Tönnis angle on all hips, as well as FEAR index with original and modified approaches, were measured. Intra- and interobserver reliability were calculated as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the FEAR index with both approaches and other alignments. A classification was proposed to categorize medial sourcil edges. ICCs for the 2 approaches across different sourcil groups also were calculated.

RESULTS

After we reviewed 411 patients, 49 were finally included. Thirty-two patients (40 hips) were identified as having borderline dysplasia defined by a lateral center-edge angle of 18 to 25°. Intraobserver ICCs for the modified method were good to excellent for borderline hips; poor to excellent for developmental dysplasia of the hip; and moderate to excellent for normal hips. As for interobserver reliability, the modified approach outperformed original approach with moderate-to-good interobserver reliability (developmental dysplasia of the hip group, ICC = 0.650; borderline dysplasia group, ICC = 0.813; normal hip group, ICC = 0.709). The medial sourcil edge was classified to 3 groups upon its morphology. Type II (39.0%) and III (43.9%) sourcil were the dominant patterns. The sourcil classification had substantial intraobserver agreement (observer 4, kappa = 0.68; observer 1, kappa = 0.799) and moderate interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.465). The modified approach to FEAR index possessed greater interobserver reliability in all medial sourcil edge patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified FEAR index has better intra- and interobserver reliability compared with the original approach in all hip groups and sourcil groups. Type II and III sourcil types account for the majority, to which the modified approach is better.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, development of diagnostic criteria (consecutive patients with consistently applied reference standard and blinding).

Lateral Center-edge Angle of 18° (Bone-Edge): Threshold for Hip Arthroscopy Treatment in Patients with Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip?

OBJECTIVE

Hip arthroscopy for the treatment of symptomatic borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH) has been controversial. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze minimum 2-year outcomes of BDDH after arthroscopic surgery and explore the criteria and thresholds of the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) in arthroscopic surgery for BDDH.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from patients aged 18-50 who underwent arthroscopic surgery for BDDH and had an LCEA 18-25° between September 2016 and June 2020. The consistency of interobserver and intraobserver measurements of bone-edge LCEA was analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on LCEA (18-20°and 20-25°) and the results of arthroscopy compared between groups. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, consisting of the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the international hip outcome tool-12 (IHOT-12), the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom status (PASS) were calculated.

RESULTS

In 52 patients with ≥2-year follow-up, female patients accounted for 71.2% and the mean age was 30.8 ± 8.4 years (range: 18 to 49 years). There was a high level of agreement when measuring the bone-edge LCEA definition of BDDH (Kappa = 0.921). Interobserver repeatability (ICC = 0.909, 95%CI: 0.847-0.947) and intraobserver repeatability (ICC = 0.944, 95%CI: 0.905-0.968) were excellent for bone-edge LCEA measurements. In addition to LCEA and Tönnis angle, there were no significant differences in α angle, neck stem angle, femoral anteversion angle, medial joint space, Tönnis grade of osteoarthritis, acetabular retroversion (8 sign), Cam deformity and anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) morphology between the two groups (p > 0.05). Intraoperative findings and procedures showed no statistical difference between groups (p > 0.05). The mean follow-up time was 44.4 ± 11.0 months (range: 25 to 64 months). Postoperative VAS, mHHS and IHOT-12 scores in the LCEA 18-20° group and the LCEA 20-25° group were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, and there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of MCID and PASS (mHHS and iHOT-12) between the groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients in the LCEA 18-20° group and the LCEA 20-25° group achieved favorable outcomes after arthroscopic surgery. LCEA 18° (bone-edge) should be the threshold for hip arthroscopic surgery in BDDH patients without obvious hip instability.

The Radiographic Femoroepiphyseal Acetabular Roof Index Is a Reliable and Reproducible Diagnostic Tool in Patients Undergoing Hip-Preservation Surgery: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To assess the utility of the femoroepiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index as a diagnostic tool in hip-preservation surgery.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched from database inception until May 2022 for literature addressing the utility of the FEAR index in patients undergoing hip-preservation surgery, and the results are presented descriptively.

RESULTS

Overall, there were a total of 11 studies comprising 1,458 patients included in this review. The intraobserver agreement for the FEAR index was reported by 3 of 11 studies (intraclass correlation coefficient range = 0.86-0.99), whereas the interobserver agreement was reported by 8 of 11 studies (intraclass correlation coefficient range = 0.776-1). Among the 5 studies that differentiated between hip instability and hip impingement, the mean FEAR index in 319 patients in the instability group ranged from 3.01 to 13.3°, whereas the mean FEAR index in 239 patients in the impingement group ranged from -10 to -0.77° and the mean FEAR index in 105 patients in the control group ranged from -13 to -7.7°. Three studies defined a specific cutoff value for the FEAR index, with 1 study defining a cutoff value of 5°, which correctly predicted treatment decision between periacetabular osteotomy versus osteochondroplasty 79% of the time with an AUC of 0.89, whereas another defined a cutoff of 2°, which correctly predicted treatment 90% of the time and the last study set a threshold of 3°, which provided an AUC of 0.86 for correctly predicting treatment decision.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates that the FEAR index has a high agreement and consistent application, making it a useful diagnostic tool in hip-preservation surgery particularly in patients with borderline dysplastic hips. However, given the variability in FEAR index cutoff values across studies, there is no absolute consensus value that dictates treatment decision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; Systematic Review of Level II-IV studies.

Relationship between labral length and symptoms in patients with acetabular dysplasia before rotational acetabular osteotomy

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between acetabular labral length and symptoms in patients with acetabular dysplasia. In a retrospective medical record review, 218 patients with acetabular dysplasia who had undergone rotational acetabular osteotomy were identified. After implementing the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 53 patients were analyzed for preoperative symptoms measured by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), acetabular bone morphology parameters by anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and labral parameters by radial magnetic resonance imaging. Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated among JHEQ scores, bone morphologic parameters and labral parameters. Multiple linear regression models to determine the predictive variables of JHEQ score and labral length were obtained. There was no correlation between bone morphologic parameters and JHEQ scores. Labral length measured anteriorly correlated with JHEQ pain {r [95% confidence interval (CI)] = -0.335 (-0.555, -0.071), P = 0.014}, movement subscale [r (95% CI) = -0.398 (-0.603, -0.143), P = 0.003], mental subscale [r (95% CI) = -0.436 (-0.632, -0.188), P = 0.001] and total JHEQ score [r (95% CI) = -0.451 (-0.642, -0.204), P = 0.001]. The multiple linear regression results showed that anterior labral length was independently associated with JHEQ subscales in some models. Meanwhile, age, acetabular head index and total JHEQ score were independently associated with anterior labral length in all models. Labral length, notably in anterosuperior area, in patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia was related to patient's symptom. Labral length may be an important objective image finding that can be used to assess the severity of cumulative hip instability.

Editorial Commentary: Hip Dysplasia-Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Versus Periacetabular Osteotomy: Do Not FEAR the Size of the Next Step

Hip dysplasia is characterized by inadequate acetabular coverage of the femoral head. There is a consensus that hip dysplasia with a lateral center edge angle (LCEA) less than18° should be treated with realignment of acetabular coverage by acetabular osteotomy, but there is controversy whether milder, borderline dysplasia with an LCEA between 18° and 25° should be treated with arthroscopy or acetabular reorientation. Identifying whether the problem is related to dysplasia or femoroacetabular impingement syndrome is essential, and a crucial factor is whether the hip is unstable. A femoroepiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index with a cutoff value of 2 predicts hip stability with 90% probability, even with a normative LCEA. In addition, according to the anterior-wall index (AWI), the anterior acetabular border should cross onto the middle third of the medial femoral head radius on a line that runs parallel to the femoral neck axis through the center of the femoral head. A reduced AWI suggests a deficient anterior rim. Next, lateral labrum length correlates with the FEAR index and anterior labrum length with AWI, i.e., anterior dysplasia. Consequently, the lateral labrum increases in size with progressive instability, and the anterior labrum increases in size with decreased anterior coverage. Threshold values for labrum size should be defined to guide clinical decision making. Ultimately, we require an algorithm to guide arthroscopy versus bony correction.