Superior Capsular Reconstruction: A Salvage Option for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears with Pseudoparalysis or Subscapularis Insufficiency

Latin American formal consensus on the indications for the surgical treatment of massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears

OBJECTIVES

To implement the Formal Consensus Method among a group of experts in shoulder surgery in Latin America, in order to establish appropriate indications for the surgical treatment of massive and irreparable rotator cuff injuries.

METHODS

The Formal Consensus Method was used to develop surgical treatment recommendations for massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCT). Three independent groups of experts in shoulder surgery were confirmed. The steering group conducted a systematic literature review and constructed a voting matrix consisting of 348 clinical scenarios. The rating group, composed of 15 members, rated each scenario on two occasions: first anonymously and then during an in-person discussion meeting. The median and voting ranges were used to classify each scenario as inappropriate, uncertain, or appropriate for each surgical technique. Finally, the reading group, consisting of 10 surgeons, reviewed, evaluated and rated the recommendations derived from the detailed analysis of the voting grids.

RESULTS

The main finding of the study reveals a high percentage (70%) of clinical scenarios in which consensus was achieved regarding the appropriateness or inappropriateness of different surgical alternatives for the treatment of massive and irreparable rotator cuff injuries. Through a detailed analysis of the voting grids, a total of 20 recommendations were elaborated concerning the appropriateness of various surgical techniques in addressing irreparable rotator cuff tears.

CONCLUSIONS

The indications for the operative treatment of MIRCT were determined based on expert consensus and the best available evidence, they seek to provide guidance on the appropriateness of various surgical techniques for different clinical scenarios.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Improved Yet Varied Clinical Outcomes Observed With Comparison of Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Versus Arthroscopy-Assisted Lower Trapezius Transfer for Patients With Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and arthroscopy-assisted lower trapezius tendon transfer (LTT) for posterosuperior irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs).

METHODS

Over an almost 6-year period (October 2015 to March 2021), all patients who underwent IRCT surgery with a minimum 12-month follow-up period were identified. For patients with a substantial active external rotation (ER) deficit or lag sign, LTT was preferentially selected. Patient-reported outcome scores included the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, strength score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score.

RESULTS

We included 32 SCR patients and 72 LTT patients. Preoperatively, LTT patients had more advanced teres minor fatty infiltration (0.3 vs 1.1, P = .009), a higher global fatty infiltration index (1.5 vs 1.9, P = .035), and a higher presence of the ER lag sign (15.6% vs 48.6%, P < .001). At a mean follow-up of 2.9 ± 1.3 years (range, 1.0-6.3 years), no differences in patient-reported outcome scores were observed. Postoperatively, SCR patients had a lower VAS score (0.3 vs 1.1, P = .017), higher forward elevation (FE) (156° vs 143°, P = .004), and higher FE strength (4.8 vs 4.5, P = .005) and showed greater improvements in the VAS score (6.8 vs 5.1, P = .009), FE (56° vs 31°, P = .004), and FE strength (1.0 vs 0.4, P < .001). LTT patients showed greater improvement in ER (17° vs 29°, P = .026). There was no statistically significant between-cohort difference in complication rate (9.4% vs 12.5%, P = .645) or reoperation rate (3.1% vs 10%, P = .231).

CONCLUSIONS

With adequate selection criteria, both SCR and LTT provided improved clinical outcomes for posterosuperior IRCTs. Additionally, SCR led to better pain relief and restoration of FE whereas LTT provided more reliable improvement in ER.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, treatment study with retrospective cohort comparison.

Acellular Dermal Allograft and Tensor Fascia Lata Autograft Show Similar Patient Outcome Improvement and High Rates of Complications and Failures at a Minimum Two-Year Follow-up: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To compare clinical and radiologic outcomes following superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using dermal allograft versus tensor fascia lata (TFL) autograft for massive rotator cuff tears with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

A literature search was performed by querying Scopus, EMBASE, and PubMed computerized databases from database inception through September 2022 in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies evaluating clinical and radiologic outcomes, as well as complications following SCR for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears were included. Study quality was assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment. The mean change from preoperative to postoperative values (delta) was calculated for each outcome.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies, consisting of 519 patients were identified. Mean duration of follow-up ranged from 24 to 60 months. Mean reduction in visual analog scale pain score ranged from 2.9 to 5.9 points following use of dermal allograft, and 3.4 to 7.0 points following TFL autograft reconstruction. Mean improvements in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score were similar between groups (dermal allograft: 28.0-61.6; TFL autograft: 24.7-59.3). The mean increase in forward flexion ranged from 31° to 38° with dermal allograft, versus 19° to 69° with TFL autograft. Average improvement in active external rotation with dermal allograft ranged from -0.4° to 11° and from 2° to 22.4° using TFL autograft. A similar change in acromiohumeral distance following SCR (dermal allograft: 0.9-3.2 mm; TFL autograft: 0.3-3.6 mm) was appreciated. The rate of complications within the dermal allograft group ranged from 4.5% to 38.2% versus 13.3% to 86.4% following TFL autograft. Failure rate ranged from 4.5 to 38.2% following dermal allograft versus 4.5 to 86.4% with TFL autograft.

CONCLUSIONS

Acellular dermal allograft versus TFL autograft for SCR both demonstrate improved VAS and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, with increased values in flexion and external rotation, and increased visual analog scale, although with high variability. Both grafts demonstrate high rates of complications and failures at minimum 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; systematic review of level II-IV studies.

Early Treatment of Shoulder Pathology Is Necessary but Not Enough Is Being Performed

Delayed treatment of shoulder instability results in bone loss requiring more-complicated surgery, in turn resulting in less-optimal outcomes. Similarly, delayed treatment of repairable rotator cuff tears results in irreparable tears requiring more-complicated surgery and resulting in less-optimal outcomes. Delayed treatment of shoulder pathology is a problem. Solutions include education and research investigation.

Current concepts review in the management of subscapularis tears

Subscapularis (SSc) is the prime internal rotator of shoulder. It is the most powerful rotator cuff muscle, maintaining the anterior force couple of shoulder. The tears in SSc as any other rotator cuff muscles might result from a traumatic event or more commonly from intrinsic degeneration. With the advent and widespread use of shoulder arthroscopy, SSc tears, which were once considered as "forgotten or hidden lesions" are now being increasingly recognized. Isolated SSc tears are relatively rare. They occur in combinations. Clinically internal rotation can be near normal because of the compensation provided by other internal rotators. It is not uncommon for patients with SSc tear to be normal on routine physical examination. The Bear Hug test (BHT) has high sensitivity and accuracy in the diagnosis of SSc tear. The combined use of BHT with Belly Press Test has been found optimal for diagnosis. US is an accurate and reliable method for diagnosing SSc tears and outperformed MRI in diagnosing partial-thickness SSc tears. The MRI is currently the most advanced imaging available for diagnosis. The specificity is up to 100%. However, the sensitivity is between 36 and 40%. The earliest classification system for SSc tears was by Fox et al. The commonly used classification is by Lafosse et al. The recent system by Yoo et al. is based on the insertion of SSc. The comma sign is gaining importance not only in arthroscopic diagnosis but also in MRI identification and repair of SSc. The mode of management is mainly arthroscopic. The techniques of repair of SSc are continuously progressing. However, there is no clear consensus on the double vs single-row repairs, biceps tendon management, and the role of coracoplasty. Future research must focus on these areas. Reserve shoulder arthroplasty is reserved for salvage in older age groups. Tendon transfers are performed in young active individuals with irreparable tears.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Allograft Combined With Remaining Rotator Cuff Augmentation Improved Shoulder Pain and Function at 1 Year After The Surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to report structural integrity and clinical outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using a 4- to 5-mm acellular dermal allograft combined with augmentation of the remaining rotator cuff to the graft.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 21 patients with symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tear who required SCR. At least 6 months after the SCR, we evaluated each patient's graft healing by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We also assessed the range of motion (ROM), strength for forward flexion and external rotation, visual analog scale for pain (PVAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, and Constant score. At minimum of 1 year after the surgery, we evaluated the number of patients with minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for each score to compare patients with healed and unhealed grafts.

RESULTS

Postoperative MRI showed the grafts intact in 14 patients (66.7%). Among 7 patients with unhealed grafts, tears were observed in 3 patients (42.9%) on the glenoid side, 3 (42.9%) on the humeral side, and 1 (14.3%) on both sides. PVAS, ASES score, and the Constant score improved after surgery (4.0 to 0.7 for PVAS [P < .001], 55.5 to 87.0 for ASES score [P < .001], and 56.0 to 65.9 for Constant score [P = .007]). However, there were no differences in postoperative ROM and muscle strength compared to preoperative measurements. MCIDs were reached in 90.5% of patients (n = 19) for the PVAS and in 71.4% of patients (n = 15) for the ASES score. Only 33.3% of patients (n = 7) obtained MCIDs for the Constant score, and none of the patients with a graft tear obtained MCIDs in the Constant score (P = .047).

CONCLUSION

The graft complete healing rate was 66.7%, although pain relief and functional improvement were satisfactory regardless of graft structural integrity. However, muscle strength recovery was not optimal until 1 year after surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; case series.