Editorial Commentary: Meniscus Tears Seen at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Are Overtreated

Non-operative Management of Acute Knee Injuries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute knee injuries are commonly encountered in both the clinical and sideline setting and may be treated operatively or non-operatively. This article describes an evidence-based approach to non-operative acute knee injury. This includes history, physical exam, imaging, and initial management. In addition, the non-operative management of three such injuries-ligament injury, meniscus injury, and patellar dislocation injury-will be discussed via a case-based practical approach.

RECENT FINDINGS

Aside from grade III ACL tears, most acute knee ligament injuries, especially in the absence of other concurrent injuries, can be treated non-operatively. There is new evidence that acute traumatic meniscus tears in those younger than 40 can be successfully treated non-operatively and can do equally, as well as those that undergo surgery, at 1 year out from injury. Based on the current literature, a short period of knee bracing in extension with progression to weightbearing to tolerance is recommended after initial patellar dislocation. Many of the most common acute knee injuries, including MCL tears, meniscus tears, and patellar dislocations, can be managed non-operatively. A detailed systemic approach to initial evaluation, including pertinent history, physical exam, and appropriate imaging, is essential and complementary to the subsequent non-operative treatment algorithm.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction results in better patient reported outcomes but has no advantage for activities of daily living or the subsequent development of osteoarthritis. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical reconstruction of ACL injuries is a common strategy but superiority over conservative treatment has not been established. The aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between operative and non-operative treatment of ACL injuries.

METHODS

Systematic review of Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar, including all level 1-3 studies from 2000 to 2021. Patient reported outcome scores and objective measures for knee stability were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tools. GRADE was used to assess the quality of the body of evidence. Heterogeneity was assessed using χ2 and I² statistics.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included in the analysis. All studies had a high risk of bias and were of low quality. The pooled estimates for IKDC (p = 0.040) favored surgical treatment. There were significant differences for activities of daily living (p = 0.0001) in favor of conservative treatment. There were significant differences for knee stability (p = 0.016) in favor of surgical treatment. The risk of osteoarthritis was not significantly different between the two treatment modalities (p = 0.219). Patients undergoing surgery had a 57% higher risk of osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSION

ACL reconstruction results in a significantly more stable knee with superior clinical and functional outcomes. However, these advantages over conservative treatment were not observed for routine activities of daily living, and subjective patient perceived outcomes favor nonsurgical treatment. Surgical treatment did not reduce the risk of later developing osteoarthritis. Regardless, due to low study quality and high risk of bias, these findings must be interpreted with caution.