Defining Clinically Significant Outcomes Following Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Allograft

Clinical and radiological outcomes between superior capsule reconstruction using allografts or xenografts: a 2-year retrospective comparison study

BACKGROUND

Treating symptomatic, massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears remains challenging and controversial. Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) using the tensor fascia lata has shown promising clinical results; however, due to donor site morbidity, interest in SCR using other grafts has increased. Yet, no studies have compared allografts with xenografts. In addition, the clinical results of graft tears remain controversial. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of SCR between those with allografts and xenografts.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients who had undergone SCR with allografts or xenografts between January 2016 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Furthermore, 62 patients were evaluated 2 years postsurgery, with five patients excluded due to loss to follow-up or conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and visual analog scale scores, range of motion, and radiological outcomes were evaluated before the surgery and at 6 and 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The graft tear rate was 23.08% in the allograft group and 42.86% in the xenograft group at 6 months after surgery; at 2 years postsurgery, the gap further widened to 32.43% and 64%, respectively, showing a significant difference. The graft in the allograft group was thicker than that in the xenograft group, and there were significant differences on the humeral side and in the midsubstance area. The allograft group showed significantly better visual analog scale, Constant, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores than the xenograft group 2 years postsurgery. However, the difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups did not surpass minimal clinically important differences.

CONCLUSION

Although arthroscopic SCR using xenografts had significantly lower clinical outcome than allografts, this difference did not reach minimal clinically important differences. Arthroscopic SCR using xenografts showed higher graft tear rates than allografts. Even with partial tears, better results were obtained if the graft continuity was maintained. Additionally, after surgery, the xenograft showed less thickness than the allograft and resulted in more tears, specifically in the midsubstance area.

Does the addition of post-operative gabapentin reduce the use of narcotics after orthopedic surgery?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of post-operative gabapentin administration as an analgesic agent and its effect on narcotic use after orthopedic surgery in an outpatient sports medicine practice by comparing patients prior to and after initiating the routine use of gabapentin as part of a standardized post-operative pain medication regimen. We hypothesized that adding gabapentin to a multimodal post-operative pain regimen would decrease the number of requested pain medication refills and have no detrimental effect on Visual Analogue Scale and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores at these early post-operative visits.

METHODS

All outpatient surgical patients, <90 years of age, undergoing outpatient orthopedic surgery by the study's senior author were included between 08/05/2021 and 02/22/2022. Patients were allowed 1 narcotic refill post-operatively and only in the first 3 weeks. The primary outcome was difference in percentage of patients who requested a narcotic refill within 3 weeks post-op. Two- and 6-week Visual Analogue Scale and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores, and baseline health and demographic data. T-tests were run on continuous variables, Chi-Square or Fisher's Exact Test were run on dichotomous variables, and Mann-Whitney U test was run on all other categorical variables. Statistical significance was set at P < .05 for all tests.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in narcotic refills at 3 weeks: 23 pre-gabapentin patients and 9 post-gabapentin patients (22.8% vs 9.0%, respectively: P = .006). There were no differences between 2- and 6-week Visual Analogue Scale and 2-week Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores. There was a significant difference in 6-week SANE between groups: mean difference = 6.4 (P = .027) though less than the established MCID.

CONCLUSION

Addition of gabapentin to a post-operative multimodal pain regimen reduced the use of narcotics after orthopedic sports medicine surgeries while also providing equivalent pain control.

Reversing chronic pseudoparesis secondary to massive, irreparable rotator cuff tear: superior capsular reconstruction vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have defined pseudoparesis as limited active forward elevation between 45° and 90° and maintained passive range of motion (ROM) in the setting of a massive rotator cuff tear (RCT). Although pseudoparesis can be reliably reversed with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) or superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), the optimal treatment for this indication remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of RSA to SCR in patients with pseudoparesis secondary to massive, irreparable RCT (miRCT).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients aged 40-70 years with pseudoparesis secondary to miRCT who were treated with either RSA or SCR by a single fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon from 2016 to 2021 with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Multivariate linear regression modeling was used to compare active ROM, visual analog pain scale (VAS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score between RSA and SCR while controlling for confounding variables.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were included in the RSA cohort and 23 patients were included in the SCR cohort with similar mean follow-up times (26.2 ± 21.1 vs. 21.9 ± 14.7 months, respectively). The patients in the RSA group were significantly older than those in the SCR group (65.2 ± 4.4 vs. 54.2 ± 7.8 years, P < .001) and had more severe arthritis (1.8 ± 0.9 vs. 1.2 ± 0.5 Samilson-Prieto, P = .019). The pseudoparesis reversal rate among the RSA and SCR cohorts was 96.3% and 91.3%, respectively. On univariate analysis, the RSA cohort demonstrated significantly greater mean improvement in active FF (89° ± 26° vs. 73° ± 30° change, P = .048), greater postoperative SSV (91 ± 8% vs. 69 ± 25%, P < .001), lower postoperative VAS pain scores (0.6 ± 1.2 vs. 2.2 ± 2.9, P = .020), and less postoperative internal rotation (IR; 4.6° ± 1.6° vs. 6.9° ± 1.8°, P = .004) compared with SCR. On multivariate analysis controlling for age and osteoarthritis, RSA remained a significant predictor of greater SSV (β = 21.5, P = .021) and lower VAS scores (β = -1.4, P = .037), whereas SCR was predictive of greater IR ROM (β = 3.0, P = .043).

CONCLUSION

Although both RSA and SCR effectively reverse pseudoparesis, patients with RSA have higher SSV and lower pain scores but less IR after controlling for age and osteoarthritis. The results of this study may inform surgical decision making for patients who are suitable candidates for either procedure.

Determining minimal clinically important difference and patient-acceptable symptom state after arthroscopic isolated subscapularis repair

Background

Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) have emerged as patient-based treatment assessments. However, these have not been investigated in patients undergoing arthroscopic isolated subscapularis repair (AISR). The primary purpose of this study was to determine the MCID and PASS for commonly used patient-reported outcomes in individuals who underwent AISR. The secondary purpose was to assess potential associations between preoperative and intraoperative patient characteristics and the MCID and PASS.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on prospectively collected data for patients who underwent primary AISR between 2011 and 2021 at a single institution, with minimum 2-year postoperative follow-up. Functional outcomes were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scale. The MCID was determined using the distribution-based method, while PASS was evaluated using area under the curve analysis. To investigate the relationship between preoperative variables and the achievement of MCID and PASS thresholds, Pearson and Spearman coefficient analyses were employed for continuous and noncontinuous variables, respectively.

Results

A total of 77 patients with a mean follow-up of 58.1 months were included in the study. The calculated MCID values for VAS pain, ASES, and SSV were 1.2, 10.2, and 13.2, respectively. The PASS values for VAS pain, ASES, and SSV were 2.1, 68.8, and 68, respectively. There was no significant correlation between tear characteristics and the likelihood of achieving a MCID or PASS. Female sex, worker's compensation status, baseline VAS pain score, and baseline ASES score, exhibited weak negative correlations for achieving PASS for VAS pain and ASES.

Conclusion

This study defined the MCID and PASS values for commonly used outcome measures at short-term follow-up in patients undergoing AISR. Tear characteristics do not appear to impact the ability to achieve a MCID or PASS after AISR. Female sex, worker's compensation claim, and low baseline functional scores have weak negative correlations with the achievement of PASS for VAS pain and ASES scores.

Effect of age and gender in rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference and patient-acceptable symptom state 2 years after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the effects of gender and age on achieving clinically significant outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ASCR for irreparable rotator cuff tear between 2013 and 2020 were reviewed. Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative PROMs were collected, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant, single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) were calculated for each functional score and analyzed according to age and gender. The percentages of patients achieving MCID and PASS were recorded.

RESULTS

The study included 83 patients, with a mean follow-up of 3.5 ± 1.4 years. Significant improvements were found in ASES, Constant, SANE, and VAS for all groups based on gender and age. Based on receiver-operating characteristic curves, all scores had acceptable areas under the curve for PASS. Values for PASS and MCID were 81.5 and 10.3 for ASES; 61.5 and 6.2 for Constant; 82.5 and 11.5 for SANE and 1.5 and 1.1 for VAS, respectively. Analysis of achieving MCID and PASS showed no difference between the groups in the majority of outcome measures. However, female patients achieved the SANE thresholds for PASS at significantly higher rates than male patients. Patients ≥65 years old achieved ASES and Constant thresholds for MCID at significantly higher rates than patients ˂65 years old.

CONCLUSION

Most patients achieved MCID and PASS at a 2-year follow-up. Patients showed comparable rates of MCID and PASS achievement on most outcome tools based on age and gender. Female patients achieved PASS on SANE at significantly higher rates than male patients and older patients achieved MCID on ASES and Constant at higher rates than young patients. Thus, age is a stronger factor for achieving MCID than gender.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging rotator cuff tendon stump classification correlates with the surgical outcomes following superior capsular reconstruction

HYPOTHESIS

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between rotator cuff stump classification and postoperative outcomes after superior capsular reconstruction (SCR).

METHODS

A total of 75 patients who underwent SCR between June 2013 and May 2021 were included in this study. Based on stump classification using the signal intensity ratio of the tendon rupture site to the deltoid muscle in the coronal view of preoperative T2-weighted, fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging scans, the patients were classified into types 1, 2, and 3 with ratios of <0.8, 0.8-1.3, and >1.3 (44, 17, and 14 patients, respectively). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and range of motion were evaluated at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up postoperatively. The acromiohumeral distance and rotator cuff arthropathy according to the Hamada classification were assessed on plain radiography. The graft integrity was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging at 3 and 12 months postoperatively and annually thereafter.

RESULTS

Clinical and radiological outcomes were significantly improved after SCR. In comparison with type 2 and 3 patients, type 1 patients had significantly higher ASES scores (type 1, 2, and 3 = 84 ± 10, 75 ± 15, and 76 ± 14; all P = .014), Constant scores (type 1, 2, and 3 = 65 ± 5, 61 ± 9, and 56 ± 13; all P = .005), and forward flexion (type 1, 2, and 3 = 155 ± 10, 154 ± 15, and 145 ± 13; all P = .013). However, these statistical differences between groups were below the established minimum clinically important difference values for the ASES and Constant scores after rotator cuff repair. The graft failure rate after surgery was lower in the type 1 group than that in the other 2 groups; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .749).

CONCLUSION

Patients with stump classification type 1 showed significantly better functional scores (ASES and VAS scores) and forward flexion; however, the clinical importance of these differences may be limited. Stump classification may be useful for predicting postoperative clinical outcomes.

Preoperative patient factors that predict achieving the minimal clinically important difference following arthroscopic treatment of snapping scapula syndrome

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after arthroscopic treatment of snapping scapula syndrome (SSS) using a distribution-based method, and to identify demographic, clinical, and intraoperative factors significantly associated with the achievement of MCID. It was hypothesized that subjective satisfaction scores after the procedure would be strongly associated with the achievement of MCID thresholds for the PROs and that pain, preoperative response to injection, and a scapulectomy in addition to bursal resection would be predictive of clinically relevant improvement.

METHODS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment of SSS between October 2005 and September 2020 with a minimum of 2-year short-term postoperative follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective single-center study. The MCID was calculated using a distribution-based approach for the following PROs: 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and visual analog scale (VAS) pain "today" and "at worst." The association between achievement of the MCID and postoperative subjective satisfaction was investigated, and factors associated with achievement of MCID were determined using bivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of a total of 190 patients assessed for eligibility, 77 patients (38.1 ± 14.3 years; 36 females) were included. Within the study population, statistically significant improvements in postoperative SF-12 physical component summary (PCS) (P < .001) and mental component summary (MCS) (P < 0.034), ASES (P < .001), QuickDASH (P < .001), SANE (P < .001), and VAS pain (P < .001) scores were observed at the minimum 2-year follow-up. The calculated MCID threshold values based on the study population were 5.0 for SF-12 PCS, 5.8 for SF-12 MCS, 11.3 for ASES, -10.5 for QuickDASH, 14.7 for SANE, 1.5 for VAS pain, and 1.7 for VAS pain at worst. Reaching the MCID was strongly associated with postoperative satisfaction (rated on a scale of 1-10). Across the PROs, younger age, favorable preoperative response to injection, partial scapuloplasty or scapulectomy, no prior surgery, and pain and function at baseline were significantly associated with attaining MCID.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for SSS experienced clinically significant improvements in functional scores, pain, and quality of life. This study demonstrated predictive roles for certain patient-specific factors and diagnostic variables for achieving MCID in PROs, which may help surgeons preoperatively assess the probability of success and manage patient expectations.

Quantifying Threshold Scores for Patient Satisfaction After Massive Rotator Cuff Repair for the Interpretation of Mid-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes

PURPOSE

To establish minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) values for 4 patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients undergoing arthroscopic massive rotator cuff repair (aMRCR): American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Veterans Rand-12 (VR-12) score, and the visual analog scale (VAS) pain. In addition, our study seeks to determine preoperative factors associated with achieving clinically significant improvement as defined by the MCID and PASS.

METHODS

A retrospective review at 2 institutions was performed to identify patients undergoing aMRCR with minimum 4-year follow-up. Data collected at the 1-year, 2-year, and 4-year time points included patient characteristics (age, sex, length of follow-up, tobacco use, and workers' compensation status), radiologic parameters (Goutallier fatty infiltration and modified Collin tear pattern), and 4 PRO measures (collected preoperatively and postoperatively): ASES score, SSV, VR-12 score, and VAS pain. The MCID and PASS for each outcome measure were calculated using the distribution-based method and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, respectively. Pearson and Spearman coefficient analyses were used to determine correlations between preoperative variables and MCID or PASS thresholds.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients with a mean follow-up of 64 months were included in the study. The MCID and PASS values at the 4-year follow-up for ASES were 14.5 and 69.4, respectively; for SSV, 13.7 and 81.5; for VR-12, 6.6 and 40.3; and for VAS pain, 1.3 and 1.2. Greater infraspinatus fatty infiltration was associated with failing to reach clinically significant values.

CONCLUSIONS

This study defined MCID and PASS values for commonly used outcome measures in patients undergoing aMRCR at the 1-year, 2-year, and 4-year follow-up. At mid-term follow-up, greater preoperative rotator cuff disease severity was associated with failure to achieve clinically significant outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Subacromial Balloon Spacer for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear Treatment Shows Improved Pain and Strength at 5-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To report on minimum 5-year outcomes following subacromial balloon spacer implantation (SBSI), in terms of survivorship, pain reduction, functional outcomes, complications, and reoperations.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed for consecutive patients undergoing SBSI between April 1, 2012, and June 30, 2016. Patients completed preoperative and postoperative follow-up for minimum 5 years on the following patient-reported outcomes (PROs): Constant-Murley Score (CMS), visual analog scale for pain (VAS), strength, and patient satisfaction. Reoperations and complications were recorded. Minimal detectable change (MDC) was calculated and the proportion of patients achieving MDC for CMS and VAS were calculated.

RESULTS

During the study period, SBSI was performed in 36 patients. Three patients were deceased within 5 years. Of the remaining 33 patients, follow-up was available on 29 patients (80.6%). Mean age at the time of operation was 72.7 ± 4.5 years, and 69% of the patients were males. Mean follow-up time was 72.5 months. Significant improvements from preoperative to last follow-up were demonstrated in CMS (36.08 vs. 63.88; P < .001), VAS (6.72 vs. 1.68; P < .001), and strength (3.8 vs 5.87 kg; P < .001). These improvements were demonstrated at 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 60 months. Mean patient satisfaction at last follow-up was 8.72. The MDC for both CMS and VAS was achieved by 75.9% (22/29) of patients. Four patients underwent conversion to a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Complications included one patient with balloon dislocation and one patient with a secondary infection due to urinary tract infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain reduction and functional improvements are sustained at minimum 5 years after SBSI in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears. The 5-year conversion rate to an RTSA was 13.79%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case-series.

Postoperative Graft Volume Reduction Is Associated With Inferior Clinical Outcomes of Superior Capsule Reconstruction Using an Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether postoperative graft volume reduction is associated with clinical outcomes after superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) and to identify factors related to graft volume change.

METHODS

Between May 2018 and June 2021, patients who underwent SCR with acellular dermal matrix allograft for irreparable rotator cuff tear with a minimum 1-year follow-up and who had intact graft continuity in postoperative 6-month magnetic resonance imaging were retrospectively reviewed. The lateral half to the medial half of the graft volume ratio was defined as lateral half graft volume ratio. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative lateral half graft volume ratio was defined as lateral half graft volume change. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with preserved graft volume (group I) and those with reduced graft volume (group II). Intergroup differences in clinical and radiological characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients were included, with 47 (58.0%) in group I and 34 (42.0%) in group II. Group I showed significantly lower lateral half graft volume change (0.018 ± 0.064 vs 0.370 ± 0.177; P < .001) than group II. Group II showed significantly greater preoperative Hamada grade (1.3 ± 0.5 vs 2.2 ± 0.6, P < .001), an anteroposterior distance of the graft at the greater tuberosity (APGT) (30.3 ± 4.8 vs 35.2 ± 3.8, P < .001), and fatty infiltration of infraspinatus (2.3 ± 0.9 vs 3.1 ± 0.8, P < .001) and subscapularis (0.9 ± 0.9 vs 1.6 ± 1.3, P = .009) than group I. Group II had a significantly lower proportion of patients achieving MIC in Constant score than group I (70.2% vs 47.1%, P = .035). The Hamada grade, APGT, and fatty infiltration of infraspinatus and subscapularis were independent factors of graft volume change.

CONCLUSIONS

Although SCR improved pain and shoulder function, postoperative graft volume reduction was related to a lower rate of minimal important change achievement in the Constant score compared with preserved graft volume. The preoperative Hamada grade, APGT, and fatty infiltration of infraspinatus and subscapularis were associated with graft volume reduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Patient-Specific Variables Associated with Failure to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes After Meniscal Allograft Transplantation at Minimum 5 Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To determine the improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) necessary to achieve minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) after primary meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) at a minimum of 5-year follow-up, while identifying variables predictive of achieving clinically significant outcomes (CSOs).

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed to identify patients undergoing primary MAT at a single institution from 1999 to 2016. Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales were collected before surgery and at a minimum of 5-year follow-up. A distribution-based approach was used to calculate MCID, whereas an anchor-based approach was used to calculate SCB and PASS. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with CSO achievement.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients undergoing MAT (56% medial, 44% lateral) were included with a mean follow-up of 9.8 ± 4.1 years, age of 29.7 ± 8.5 years, and body mass index (BMI) of 26.5 ± 4.7. Thresholds for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at a minimum 5-year follow-up for Lysholm (10.3, 74.5, 32.5), IKDC (12.1, 55.6, 29.1), and KOOS subscales questionnaires (Pain [11.0, 70.7, 25.1], Symptoms [11.0, 60.8, 19.6], Activities of Daily Living [10.5, 90.3, 17.9], Sport [16.2, 47.4, 37.5], and Quality of Life [13.6, 40.5, 37.3]) were calculated. Reduced odds of achieving MCID were associated with higher preoperative PROM scores, BMI, patient age, concomitant osteotomy, male sex, and worker's compensation (WC) status. Reduced odds of achieving PASS were associated with lower preoperative PROM scores, higher BMI (particularly ≥30), patient age, and WC status. Reduced odds of achieving SCB were associated with higher preoperative PROM scores and WC status.

CONCLUSIONS

This study established the MCID, PASS, and SCB at 5-year minimum follow-up for the Lysholm score, IKDC, and KOOS subscales in patients who underwent MAT. Increased BMI and patient age, male sex, performance of concomitant osteotomy, WC status, and preoperative PROM scores were associated with failure to achieve CSOs after primary MAT at a minimum of 5-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study, retrospective case series.

Comparison of Outcomes After Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction Versus Arthroscopic Partial Repair or Arthroscopic Debridement for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Background

Arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (SCR), arthroscopic partial repair (PR), and arthroscopic debridement (DB) are valid treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff (RC) tears.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic SCR with arthroscopic PR and arthroscopic DB in patients with irreparable posterosuperior RC tears. It was hypothesized that SCR would lead to superior clinical and functional outcomes compared with PR or DB.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Clinical and functional outcomes of this single-center retrospective study included range of motion, strength, and the age- and sex-adjusted Constant-Murley score. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) involved the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, the Subjective Shoulder Value, and the visual analog scale for pain. Graft and repaired tendon integrity was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 12 months of follow-up.

Results

In total, 57 patients treated with SCR (n = 20), PR (n = 17), and DB (n = 20) were included. The mean clinical follow-up was 33.8 ± 17.9 months. Preoperative clinical and functional characteristics were comparable among the 3 groups. The range of motion and clinical and functional scores of all 3 groups significantly improved from pre- to postoperatively. Postoperative PROMs showed no differences among all 3 study groups. SCR revealed significantly higher postoperative strength compared with PR (P = .001) and DB (P = .004). Postoperative MRI revealed a rerupture in 4 patients with SCR (20%). Postoperative MRI showed a rerupture in 9 patients with PR ( 53%). Fatty muscle infiltration of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus significantly progressed within all 3 study groups in postoperative MRI scans. No clinical and functional differences were observed between intact and reruptured PR.

Conclusion

Patients who underwent SCR had better postoperative strength recovery than patients who underwent PR or DB.

Factors influencing clinical outcomes in superior capsular reconstruction: A scoping review

Background

It is undetermined how effective superior capsule/capsular reconstruction (SCR) is, and which factors influence clinical outcomes.

Questions/purposes

(1) To identify which factors influence outcomes in SCR, (2) to evaluate the effect of graft integrity on clinical outcomes, and (3) to compare SCR to other procedures for irreparable rotator cuff tears.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for clinical SCR studies. Data on specific factors that influenced outcomes, that compared outcomes between intact/torn graft groups, or compared SCR to alternative treatments for irreparable tears were extracted by two investigators. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes between intact vs torn SCR grafts.

Results

394 articles were identified. 100 full-text articles were screened. 13 studies were included for scoping review. Eight studies were meta-analyzed. Better clinical scores were found in younger patients, with intact/repairable subscapularis, without acetabulization/arthritis, who played sports. In patients with irreparable tears without arthritis, SCR produced similar clinical scores at 2 years as shoulder arthroplasty and partial infraspinatus repair, and greater improvements in ASES and Constant scores than latissimus dorsi tendon transfer. Intact grafts produced better VAS (mean difference [MD] = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [-1.45-0.50], P < 0.0001, I 2 = 67%, n [patients] = 261), ASES (MD = 8.29, [2.89-13.70], P = 0.003, I 2 = 74%, n = 281), external rotation (MD = 4.49, [0.36-8.61], P = 0.03, I 2 = 0%, n = 240), and acromiohumeral distance (MD = 2.45, [0.96-3.94], P = 0.001, I 2 = 92%, n = 260) than torn grafts.

Conclusions

Patients who underwent SCR for irreparable rotator cuff tears were more likely to have better clinical outcomes if they were younger, had intact/repairable subscapularis, without acetabulization/arthritis, played sports and had intact grafts.

Patient Acceptable Symptom State, Minimal Clinically Important Difference, and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) have rarely been assessed after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) with fascia lata autograft.

PURPOSE

(1) To investigate PASS, MCID, and SCB values for pain visual analog scale (pVAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) after ASCR with fascia lata autograft, (2) to investigate factors for achieving PASS, MCID, and SCB.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from patients who underwent ASCR between June 2013 and October 2020. A total of 88 patients were included, and anchor questions for deriving PASS, MCID, and SCB values were applied at a minimum 1-year follow-up postoperatively. PASS, MCID, and SCB were derived using sensitivity- and specificity-based approaches. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine factors for achieving PASS, MCID, and SCB.

RESULTS

Based on receiver operating characteristic curves, all 4 scores had acceptable area under the curve values (>0.7) for PASS, MCID, and SCB values. The PASS, MCID, and SCB values were 1.5, 2.5, and 4.5 for pVAS; 81.0, 19.0, and 27.5 for the ASES score; 60.5, -0.5, and 5.5 for the Constant score; and 75.0, 27.5, and 32.5 for SANE, respectively. Poor preoperative scores were related to significantly higher odds ratios (ORs) for achieving MCID and SCB. Wide acromiohumeral distance and dominant side were related to higher ORs for achieving PASS for the ASES score, and subscapularis tear was related to lower ORs for achieving PASS for pVAS and SCB for the Constant score.

CONCLUSION

Reliable PASS, MCID, and SCB values were achieved for at least 1 year after ASCR surgery. Poor preoperative score, wide acromiohumeral distance, and dominant side all demonstrated higher ORs for at least one value, but a subscapularis tear demonstrated lower ORs for achieving PASS for pVAS and SCB for the Constant score.

Editorial Commentary: Determination of Meaningful, Clinically Significant Outcome Thresholds for Superior Capsular Reconstruction of the Shoulder: Predicting Those Patients Who Improve and Those Who Don't!

Since the introduction of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears nearly 10 years ago, we have witnessed widespread adoption by the arthroscopic shoulder community alongside an exponential increase in use within North America. To date, more than 42,000 acellular dermal allografts have been implanted in the United States alone, and our indications and surgical technique have been progressively refined in response to the evolving body of clinical outcomes research. However, with P values set aside, the real question still remains: how do our patients actually do after SCR? With the advent of clinically significant outcomes such as the patient acceptability symptomatic state and substantial clinical benefit, investigators have sought to establish more practical, patient-centered benchmarks for success after an intervention. Rather than just seeking the baseline expectations via the minimally clinically important difference (i.e., "I am better"), substantial clinical benefit (i.e., "I am so much better") and patient acceptability symptomatic state (i.e., "I am 'okay' with how I feel") truly clarify patient satisfaction and provide measurable units of patient improvement. These must be assessed on an individual basis, as aggregated averages introduce outliers that can distort the outcomes. Based on these end points, prognostic factors may allow a more concrete assessment of surgical risk while equipping physicians with appropriate information to guide ideal patient selection and optimize chances of success. Patients of female sex, older age, worker's compensation status, and those with subscapularis involvement are less likely to achieve clinically significant outcomes at minimum 1-year follow-up after SCR. Based on the current study, surgeons should exercise caution in recommending SCR for patients of advancing chronological age and significant subscapularis involvement, particularly if irreparable or untreated.