Suture Tape Augmentation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Increases Biomechanical Stability: A Scoping Review of Biomechanical, Animal, and Clinical Studies

Editorial Commentary: Clinical and Basic Science Evidence Supports the Use of Suture Tape Augmentation of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Although isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries often can be treated successfully without surgical intervention, in the setting of persistent instability or multiligamentous knee injury, PCL reconstruction is indicated. PCL reconstructions often have resulted in persistent postoperative laxity. Recent research suggests there may be a role for suture tape-augmented grafts, which have demonstrated decreased clinical and radiographic laxity as well as improved rates of return to previous level of activity, as compared with PCL reconstruction alone. Several biomechanical studies also have supported the use of suture tape augmentation in PCL reconstruction, and the use of suture tape augmentation or internal bracing and ligament surgery is gaining widespread popularity. These ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene/polyester suture tapes have been shown to be safe and effective. We may be at the point at which the evidence supports the use of suture tape augmentation of PCL reconstruction.

Suture Tape Augmentation Improves Posterior Stability After Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autograft With Single-Bundle Transtibial Technique

PURPOSE

To assess whether posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) with suture tape augmentation can yield more stability after isolated PCLR.

METHODS

A prospective database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent primary isolated PCLR (control group) or isolated PCLR with suture tape augmentation (study group) from January 2016 to September 2020. We analyzed subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner knee scores; posterior drawer test findings; posterior stress radiographs; and return-to-sports activity rates. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was used to evaluate clinical relevance (subjective IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores).

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients were included in this analysis (28 in control group and 31 in study group). The average length of follow-up was similar between the study and control groups (48.6 months vs 47.9 months, P = .800). Knee function was significantly improved in the study group in terms of subjective IKDC scores (85.1 ± 6.4 in study group vs 79.8 ± 6.4 in control group, P = .002), Lysholm scores (86.3 ± 7.4 vs 80.8 ± 7.4, P = .005), and Tegner scores (7.0 ± 1.4 vs 5.6 ± 1.7, P = .006). However, the differences between the control and study groups were less than the MCID for the subjective IKDC score and Lysholm score. In the control and study groups, 21.4% of patients (6 of 28) and 48.4% of patients (15 of 31), respectively, returned to their preinjury sports activity levels (P = .031). At last follow-up, the mean side-to-side difference in posterior laxity was significantly improved in the study group compared with the control group (1.52 ± 0.70 mm in study group vs 3.17 ± 2.01 mm in control group, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary isolated PCLR with suture tape augmentation provides better posterior stability than PCLR without suture tape augmentation at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. No differences between the groups were observed in the percentage of patients who met or exceeded the MCID for the subjective IKDC and Lysholm scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Analysis of Graft Types Augmented With an Internal Brace for ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

New techniques are being developed to decrease the failure rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts and prevent revision surgery. One such technique involves high-strength suture tape (ST), also referred to as internal bracing. Recent literature has highlighted the use of ST for ACL reconstruction, but no study has compared ST augmentation between graft types.

PURPOSE

To compare the use of ST augmentation for ACL reconstruction based on the type of graft used (ie, bone-patellar tendon-bone [BPTB], quadriceps, hamstring).

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 5.

METHODS

An online search of multiple databases was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and was completed April 2022 to identify studies related to ST augmentation of ACL grafts.

RESULTS

Of 926 studies identified, 10 met inclusion criteria. Five studies (50%) used hamstring tendon (HT), 3 (30%) used quadriceps tendon (QT), 1 (10%) used BPTB, and 1 (10%) used both HT and QT grafts. HT autografts augmented with ST had decreased dynamic and peak elongation (15%-56%), increased load to failure, and increased initial and final dynamic stiffness compared with controls. There was no significant difference in postoperative physical examination findings (range of motion, Lachman, pivot shift), except that ST-augmented grafts had significantly less laxity after surgery compared with HT alone (0.8 vs 1.9 mm; P < .05). QT allografts with ST augmentation showed increased graft strength. Human QT autograft studies showed higher Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score scores compared with controls. BPTB allografts with ST augmentation had decreased cyclic displacement by 31% (P = .015) and increased load (758 ± 128 N; P < .001) and stiffness (156 ± 23 N/mm; P = .003) compared with nonaugmented groups. The complication rate was low or showed no increase in the ST augmentation groups compared with control groups.

CONCLUSION

HT, QT, and BPTB grafts augmented with ST demonstrate an effective method for ACL reconstruction. All graft types with ST augmentation showed no evidence of clinical disadvantage, with some studies indicating significant biomechanical or clinical advantages compared with conventional ACL reconstruction.

Biomechanical Characteristics of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries Treated With and Without Augmentation: A Network Meta-analysis of Controlled Laboratory Studies

BACKGROUND

Treatment of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears with suture tape augmentation has gained interest given preliminary reports of favorable biomechanical characteristics. No study to date has quantitatively assessed the biomechanical effects of multiple augmentation techniques relative to the native UCL.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled laboratory studies to assess and comparatively rank biomechanical effects of UCL repair or reconstruction with or without augmentation.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

PubMed, OVID/Medline, and Cochrane databases were queried in January 2023. A frequentist network meta-analytic approach was used to perform mixed-treatment comparisons of UCL repair and reconstruction techniques with and without augmentation, with the native UCL as the reference condition. Pooled treatment estimates were quantified under the random-effects assumption. Competing treatments were ranked in the network meta-analysis by using point estimates and standard errors to calculate P scores (greater P score indicates superiority of treatment for given outcome).

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 206 elbow specimens in which a distal UCL tear was simulated were included. UCL reconstruction with suture tape augmentation (AugRecon) restored load to failure to a statistically noninferior magnitude (mean difference [MD], -1.99 N·m; 95% CI, -10.2 to 6.2 N·m; P = .63) compared with the native UCL. UCL reconstruction (Recon) (MD, -12.7 N·m; P < .001) and UCL repair with suture tape augmentation (AugRepair) (MD, -14.8 N·m; P < .001) were both statistically inferior to the native UCL. The AugRecon condition conferred greater load to failure compared with Recon (P < .001) and AugRepair (P = .002) conditions. AugRecon conferred greater torsional stiffness relative to all other conditions and was not statistically different from the native UCL (MD, 0.32 N·m/deg; 95% CI, -0.30 to 0.95 N·m/deg; P = .31). Medial ulnohumeral gapping was not statistically different for the AugRepair (MD, 0.30 mm; 95% CI, -1.22 to 1.82 mm; P = .70), AugRecon (MD, 0.57 mm; 95% CI, -0.70 to 1.84 mm; P = .38), or Recon (MD, 1.02 mm; 95% CI, -0.02 to 2.05 mm; P = .055) conditions compared with the native UCL. P-score analysis indicated that AugRecon was the most effective treatment for increasing ultimate load to failure and torsional stiffness, whereas AugRepair was the most effective for minimizing medial gapping.

CONCLUSION

AugRecon restored load to failure and torsional stiffness most similar to the parameters of the native UCL, whereas Recon and AugRepair did not restore the same advantageous properties at time zero. Medial ulnohumeral gapping during a valgus load was minimized by all 3 treatments. Based on network interactions, AugRecon was the superior treatment approach for restoring important biomechanical features of the UCL at time zero that are jeopardized during a complete distal tear.

Quadriceps Tendon Autograft ACL Reconstruction With Suture Tape Augmentation: Safe Results Based on Minimum 2-Year Follow-up MRI

Background

The potential intra-articular effects of ≥1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with independent suture tape augmentation (STA) are not fully understood.

Purpose

To investigate whether incorporating suture tape in an all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft (QTA) ACLR leads to satisfactory patient outcomes while having no intra-articular side effects as determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

Included were 25 patients with a mean age of 19.9 years (95% CI, 17.3-22.5 years) who underwent QTA ACLR with STA between 2016 and 2019. All patients underwent MRI at ≥1 year postoperatively and had at least a 2-year follow-up (mean, 28 months [95% CI, 26.5-29.5 months]) that included physical examination with anterior laxity testing with KT-1000 arthrometer, radiographs, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). At the final follow-up, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for applicable PROMs were applied to each patient. Postoperative graft and joint integrity were assessed using the Howell classification and the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) joint effusion/synovitis grade. The Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the chi-square or the Fisher exact test for categorical variables were used for statistical analyses.

Results

The MRI assessment of the grafts demonstrated intact grafts in all patients. Overall, 96% of patients demonstrated grades 0 or 1 MOAKS for joint effusion/synovitis. All patient outcomes significantly improved from preoperatively to the final follow-up (P < .001), except for the Marx score, which decreased significantly (14.2 [95% CI, 12.7-15.8] vs 9.72 [95% CI, 7.3-12.2]; P = .0014). At least 68% of the patients achieved the MCID threshold, and 92% achieved the PASS threshold for all applicable PROMs.

Conclusion

QTA ACLR with STA did not demonstrate adverse intra-articular changes on MRI at ≥1 year postoperatively. In addition, STA did not appear to negatively affect PROMs.

Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Suture Tape Augmentation: A Case Series of 252 Patients

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using suture tape augmentation to internally brace is a relatively new technique. The primary goal of this study was to prospectively collect patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and surgical history from patients who underwent primary ACLR with internal bracing to determine if internal bracing resulted in a low graft failure rate while maintaining acceptable PROs. A total of 252 patients with a mean age of 23.6 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.1-25.1) and a mean follow-up of 37.9 months (95% CI: 35.8-40.0) were included in this study. Patients who underwent primary ACLR with internal brace augmentation between July 12, 2016 and July 31, 2021 were eligible. A total of 222 patients were contacted via telephone and administered the visual analog scale (VAS), the single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE), the Lysholm knee score scale, and, if applicable, the short version ACL return to sport after injury (SV-ACL-RSI) survey. Additionally, patients were asked to give an updated orthopaedic history. Thirty additional patients were included from either our institution's registry or by completing their surveys in-office or by e-mail. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom states (PASS) were calculated based on our patient population and applied to each individual patient. The patients' electronic health record (EHR) was searched for pre- and postoperative clinical data including KT-1000 arthrometer measurements. Two patients (0.8%) had subsequent graft failures and one patient (0.4%) required a revision surgery. MCID was achieved in 242 patients (96.0%) for the Lysholm, 227 patients (90.1%) for the SANE, and 146 patients (57.9%) for the VAS. PASS was achieved in 214 patients (84.9%) for the Lysholm, 198 patients (78.6%) for the SANE, and 199 (80.0%) patients for the VAS, postoperatively. Of note, 65 patients (25.8%) exceeded the PASS threshold for the VAS preoperatively. A total of 127 patients (84.4%) met the cutoff of ≥60/100 for the SV-ACL-RSI survey postoperatively. Postoperative KT-1000 measurements showed near-identical side-to-side differences at both the 13.6-kg pull and manual maximum pull. When stratifying patients based on age at the time of surgery, it was noted that patients younger than 25 years had significantly higher SANE scores (91.6 [95% CI: 90.2-92.9] vs. 82.6 [95% CI: 79.0-86.2]; p < 0.0001) and lower VAS pain scores (0.7 [95% CI: 0.5-0.8] vs. 1.2 [95% CI: 0.8-1.5]; p = 0.004). Primary ACLR with internal bracing led to acceptable patient outcomes and a graft failure rate of less than 1%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: case series, IV.

Suture Tape Augmentation of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Shows Improved Biomechanical Stability With Equivalent Outcome and Complication Rates: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

To assess the current literature surrounding suture tape augmentation (STA) of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) with additional evaluation of PCLR+STA in clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic search of 3 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science Core Collection) was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was completed in April 2023 to identify studies related to PCLR+STA. Surgical technique, animal, biomechanical, and clinical studies were included for review with quality appraisal conducted according to study design.

RESULTS

A total of 380 articles were identified in the search, 6 of which met inclusion criteria. Biomechanical studies showed a significant reduction in posterior tibial translation with STA of PCLR in multiple studies. STA was found to decrease total elongation by 45% to 58% in multiple studies; increased load to failure was seen with STA as well in 1 study. Clinical studies showed equivalent or improved patient-reported outcomes with STA of PCLR compared with PCLR alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomechanical studies offer evidence showing the beneficial load-sharing properties of STA such as increased strength and ultimate load with decreased elongation of the graft, especially with larger forces. Clinical evidence illustrates improved or equivalent patient-reported outcomes to standard PCLR with no difference in complication rate.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

STA of PCLR offers an opportunity to improve initial graft stability during the early healing phase through load sharing between the augmentation and the graft.

Primary All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Tape Augmentation Resulted in Satisfactory Patient Outcomes and a Low Graft Failure Rate in High School and Collegiate Athletes

PURPOSE

To evaluate ≥2-year patient outcomes after primary all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft (ASTQ) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with suture tape augmentation (STA) in skeletally mature high school and collegiate athletes.

METHODS

All high school and collegiate athletes who underwent primary ASTQ ACLR with STA with a minimum of 2-year follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were administered validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) pre- and postoperatively. The minimal clinically important difference was calculated for each PROM based on this study population and applied to the individual patient. Return to sport, subsequent surgical intervention including contralateral ACLR, and KT-1000 arthrometer measurements for knee laxity were collected. Complications were assessed by physical examination, radiologic studies, or obtained via telephone.

RESULTS

In total, 60 patients were included in the final data analysis, with a mean age of 16.8 years (95% confidence interval 13-23) and mean final follow-up of 37.1 months (95% confidence interval 33.1-41.1). Twelve patients (20%) required subsequent surgery on the ipsilateral knee, which included 7 patients having a subsequent meniscal procedure and 3 patients who underwent arthrolysis. None sustained a graft failure, and 6 patients sustained a contralateral ACL injury necessitating surgery. All PROMs improved at the final follow-up (P < .001). In addition, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements significantly improved postoperatively at 1-year clinical follow-up (P < .001). Most patients obtained the minimal clinically important difference thresholds for each PROM at the final follow-up. There were 48 patients (80%) who participated in pivoting sports. The return-to-sport rate at same level was 54 patients (90%), with 6 patients (10%) not returning to the same level because of graduation.

CONCLUSIONS

ASTQ ACLR with STA in a young athletic patient population may result in a low graft failure rate while maintaining satisfactory patient outcomes at short-term follow-up, including a return to sport at the same level of 90%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Editorial Commentary: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair or Reconstruction With Internal Bracing, for Properly Indicated Patients, Is Safe, Biocompatible, and Biomimetic

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with internal bracing (IB)-and ACL repair with IB when indicated-reduces graft or repair failure. IB is safe and protects ligament reconstructions and repairs. The IB construct should not be misunderstood as a synthetic ligament. To be effective, suture tape must be independently secured with the knee in full extension, reflecting the terminal length of the ACL. Regardless of graft type, the graft must be cyclically tensioned independent of the IB to allow for creep, and when properly performed, this significantly increases the ultimate tensile strength of the construct and reduces graft elongation, without stress shielding. Thus, the generic term "suture augmentation" may be misleading because the successful results reported apply to the IB technique. In our experience, the failure rate after ACL reconstruction with IB is 1% at the 5-year follow-up period. Notably, these results were achieved without an additional lateral extra-articular procedure.

Routine Use of Suture Tape Augmentation for Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Is Not Justified

High rates of graft failure after primary ACLR and the need for revision ACLR continue to be a challenge. Multiple studies demonstrate graft failure rates and the need for revision ACLR in 10% to 15% of young patients participating in pivot sporting activities. There's currently a wide range of strategies to mitigate this problem being investigated, including extraarticular augmentation (with modified lateral extra-articular tenodesis or anterolateral ligament reconstruction) and intraarticular fixation (that aim for primary ACL healing or augmentation of an ACL reconstruction with suture tape). While the early data on suture tape augmentation of primary ACLR seems optimistic, it does not justify its routine use.

Less Subsequent Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Following Primary Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone ACL Reconstruction with Suture Tape Augmentation-A Retrospective Comparative Therapeutic Trial With 5-Year Follow-up

PURPOSE

To investigate patient outcomes, including revision rate, following primary bone patellar-tendon bone autograft (BPTB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with and without suture tape augmentation (STA) in a young and active cohort.

METHODS

All eligible patients who received primary BPTB ACLR with a minimum of 2-year follow-up were included in this retrospective cohort study. All patients receiving STA were augmented with the same device. Patients completed the following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): the visual analog scale, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, and the Tegner activity scale. Anteroposterior knee laxity was assessed using a KT-1000 arthrometer preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Posterior tibial slope, femoral tunnel angle, and tibial tunnel placement were calculated for all patients. Subsequent surgical interventions and return to sport (RTS) were obtained from each patient.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients (52 BPTB ACLR with STA, 62 traditional BPTB ACLR) with a mean patient age <19 years and a mean final follow-up of ≥5 years were included. Compared with the control group, the STA group demonstrated significantly less subsequent revision ACLR (0 vs. 5, P = .036). All PROMs and KT-1000 measurements improved at final follow-up (P < .001) and were comparable between groups. There were no differences seen in either posterior tibial slope or graft tunnel placement between groups. More than 85% of the patients were able to return to the sport that led to their injury at full capacity with no differences seen in RTS rate, time to RTS, or level of competition between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with traditional BPTB ACLR, additional STA appeared to safely and effectively lead to less subsequent revision ACLR while maintaining acceptable PROMs and objective joint laxity measurements in a young and active patient population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Insufficient Evidence for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Utilizing Suture Tape Augmentation: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes at Minimum 1-Year Follow-up

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of clinical studies to directly compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with versus without suture tape (ST) augmentation.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify comparative studies directly comparing outcomes of ACLR with versus without ST augmentation with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The search terms used were anterior cruciate ligament suture tape. Patients were evaluated based on graft failure rates, return to sport (RTS), anteroposterior (AP) laxity, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

RESULTS

Five studies (all Level III) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 246 patients undergoing ACLR with ST augmentation (SA group) and 282 patients undergoing ACLR without augmentation (control group). Patient age ranged from 14.9 to 29.7 years. The mean follow-up time ranged from 24.0 to 48.6 months. The mean body mass index ranged from 25.3 to 26.3 kg/m2 and the overall percentage of males ranged from 43.4% to 69.0%. Overall, the graft failure rate ranged from 1.0% to 25.0% in the SA group and 8.0% to 20.0% in the control group. Among the studies that reported RTS rates, the rate ranged from 69.2% to 88.9% in the SA group and 51.5% to 87.5% in the control group. Among all PROs, 2 studies found a significant difference in the Tegner score favoring the SA group. Otherwise, no significant differences were found between groups in terms of PROs. No significant differences in AP laxity were found between groups within any particular study. There was heterogeneity between studies regarding surgical techniques, postoperative rehabilitation protocols, and reported PROs.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to suggest that patients undergoing ACLR with ST augmentation may experience favorable clinical outcomes compared with ACLR alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of Level III studies.

Arthroscopic Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair Restores Anterior Tibial Translation Intraoperatively at Time Zero With No Additional Effect of Suture Augmentation

PURPOSE

To intraoperatively evaluate the ability of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) primary repair (ACLPR) to restore anterior tibial translation (ATT) at time zero and to assess the influence of additional suture augmentation (SA) on ATT.

METHODS

Patients with proximal ACL tears undergoing arthroscopic ACLPR with dual-suture anchor fixation were included in this time-zero clinical study. Laxity measurements were taken with a digital arthrometer to evaluate ATT stability preoperatively in the office (T0) as a standardized diagnostic tool, preoperatively under anesthesia (T1), at time zero intraoperatively after ACLPR but prior to SA fixation (T2), and after SA fixation (T3).

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients (mean age ± standard deviation [SD], 35.1 ± 12.0 years) with proximal ACL tears and significant preoperative (T0) ATT side-to-side differences (SSDs) (mean ± SD, 4.1 ± 1.5 mm) were evaluated. ACLPR was shown to restore ATT SSD at time zero (mean ± SD, 0.2 ± 1.1 mm) given that a significant reduction in ATT SSD (mean difference ± standard error, -4.7 ± 0.21 mm; P < .001) was achieved when comparing preoperative and intraoperative measurements after separate refixation of both ACL bundles with suture anchors. Additional SA fixation did not further decrease ATT when comparing measurements of the ipsilateral leg after ACL refixation and after SA fixation (mean difference ± SD, 0.03 ± 0.22 mm; P = .496).

CONCLUSIONS

ACLPR with dual-suture anchor fixation restores time-zero ATT laxity in adults with proximal ACL tears. Additional SA fixation in full knee extension does not further decrease ATT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides important information about the effectiveness of ACLPR in restoring ATT. SA with the knee fixed in full knee extension does not further decrease ATT; therefore, augmentation may not lead to overconstraint of the knee or stress shielding of the repaired ACL.

Suture Augmentation of a Four-Strand Semitendinosus Graft Improves Time-Zero Biomechanical Properties

PURPOSE

To compare the time-zero biomechanical properties of hamstring graft preparations with or without suture augmentation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in a full-construct cadaveric model.

METHODS

Hamstring grafts were harvested from 24 fresh frozen human cadavers and prepared in 1 of 3 ways: quadrupled SemiTendinosus (SemiT), and quadrupled SemiT with suture augmentation (SemiT+2.0-mm tape or SemiT+1.3-mm tape; n = 8 per group). Adjustable loop suspensory implants and cortical buttons were used for fixation on a porcine tibia and acrylic block. Testing included force-controlled cyclic loading at 250 N and 400 N followed by load to failure.

RESULTS

The 2 suture augmentation groups had less total elongation and increased stiffness compared to the nonsuture-augmented group (P = .025). The SemiT+2.0-mm tape group had 36% less total elongation and 34% increased stiffness compared to SemiT+1.3mm tape (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Suture augmentation improves construct biomechanics at time zero following hamstring tendon ACLR. Augmentation with 2.0-mm tape suture improves construct biomechanics compared to 1.3-mm tape suture.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Independent suture augmentation of a quadrupled SemiT graft improves ACLR construct biomechanics. Outcomes were improved with augmentation using 2.0-mm tape suture compared to 1.3-mm tape suture.

Technique and Outcomes of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Augmentation

Background

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries to the knee are uncommon, and ideal surgical management of these injuries is unclear. Current surgical techniques include PCL reconstruction with remnant debridement, remnant-preserving techniques, and primary PCL repair. Augmentation of PCL repairs and reconstructions has been proposed to protect repairs or grafts in the postoperative period.

Purpose

To describe PCL repair with the hamstring autograft augmentation technique and examine our preliminary midterm outcomes from a sequential cohort of patients.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

The authors identified patients at their institution who underwent remnant-preserving primary PCL repair with hamstring autograft augmentation for both isolated tears and tears associated with multiligament knee injury (MLKI). Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at a minimum 2-year follow-up using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, the 12-item Short Form Survey, and a custom return-to-play questionnaire. Patient-reported outcomes data were summarized, and the predictors of outcomes from the descriptive data and clinical measures were further examined.

Results

A total of 23 patients with a mean follow-up of 5.3 years met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 87% were associated with MLKI. The mean IKDC score was 87.7. Approximately 83% of patients were able to successfully return to their sport or occupation. Among 19 athletes, only 2 reported being unable to return to their preinjury level of sport because of limitations from their PCL surgery. Patient-reported outcome scores and return to sport or occupation did not have a statistically significant association with age, sex, body mass index, time from injury to surgery, or follow-up time.

Conclusion

Outcomes of our cohort with remnant-preserving primary PCL repairs with hamstring autograft augmentation demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes to previously published PCL data. The advantages of remnant preservation, primary repair, and augmentation with an independent hamstring autograft reconstruction are combined within this technique.

Editorial Commentary: Time-Zero Biomechanical Studies Show Suture Augmentation of a Soft-Tissue Graft Improves Its Properties, But They Need to Be Interpreted With Caution

There is emerging evidence in biomechanical studies that suture augmentation of a soft-tissue graft can improve its elongation, stiffness, and load to failure. However, all biomechanical studies have the intrinsic drawback of not considering loosening, accommodation, and mainly, healing. In the past, many very strong and stiff synthetic grafts produced poor results for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and synthetic material inside the joint was abandoned for awhile. Recent studies have shown that it is possible to use synthetic material to augment the graft instead of being the graft itself. But the question we need to ask ourselves is: Does it really work in the clinical scenario? Undoubtedly, there is still a way to go to incorporate suture augmentation into soft-tissue grafts in knee reconstruction, and it is mandatory to start high-level clinical studies to prove its real benefit to ligament reconstruction results.

Internal brace augmentation reconstruction versus standard anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised controlled clinical trial study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is one of the most common knee injuries in sports, and the gold standard for treating ACL rupture is tendon graft reconstruction. Internal brace technology is being used nowadays for ligament repair; however, more relevant in vivo clinical evidence is required for using internal brace technology in ACL reconstruction (ACLR). We conducted a randomised controlled trial to investigate the clinical efficacy of internal brace technology in ACLR.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This randomised, parallel-controlled trial included patients with ACL rupture who underwent inpatient surgery at the Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. Random number table method was used to assign the participants to either the test or the control group. The test group underwent ACLR using the internal brace technique, whereas the control group underwent standard ACLR. Uniform postoperative rehabilitation protocol was used for both the groups. Patient-reported outcomes included preoperative baseline and postoperative recovery at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The primary outcome was International Knee Documentation Committee function from baseline (ACL rupture) to 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included (1) other patient outcome reporting metrics, Lysholm knee score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Visual Analog Scale; (2) the use of Kneelax3 knee stabiliser to assess knee stability; (3) occurrence of adverse events, such as graft refraction or symptomatic instability, postoperative infection and contralateral injury and (4) magnetic resonance images at 12 and 24 months after ACLR.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University on 26 October 2021. Data will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200057526.

A comparative analysis of suture-augmented and standard hamstring autograft single-bundle ACL reconstruction outcomes: short-term functional benefits without long-term impact

BACKGROUND

Augmentation of the biologic graft with nonabsorbable suture material during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a relatively new technique to enhance its biomechanical properties and add additional support to the critical process of healing. We aimed to compare the short-term functional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complication rates of patients treated with either standard single-bundle four-strand hamstring ACLR or added suture augmentation (SA).

METHODS

Patients undergoing arthroscopic ACLR between February 2015-January 2017 and in the standard ACLR group, and between February 2017-September 2019 in the SA-ACLR group operated by adding a no.5 FiberWire® (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) braided suture to the hamstring autograft, were retrospectively reviewed and the PROMs were compared. Patients were followed up for a 24-month period and PROMs were assessed by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form and Tegner-Lysholm knee score. Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, and postoperative complications including graft retear requiring revision surgery, deep vein thrombois, and surgical site infection were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

We included 79 patients with mean age of 31.6 ± 8.3 years in the standard ACLR group, and 90 patients with mean oge of 30.5 ± 7.6 in the SA-ACLR group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, body mass index, and medical comorbidities. The values of the IKDC scores increased to 75.8 ± 18.9 in the standard ACLR group, and 85.6 ± 12.6 in the SA-ACLR group, 24 months after the operation (P < 0.05). The 24-month postoperative Tegner-Lysholm scores escalated to 79.3 ± 21.0 in the standard ACLR group and 91.0 ± 13.7 in the SA-ACLR group (P < 0.05). Four (5.1%) patients in the standard ACLR group and 4 (4.4%) in the SA-ACLR group experienced graft retear requiring revision surgery (P > 0.05). Incidence of surgical site infection and deep vein thrombosis showed no significant differences between the two groups, 24 months after ACLR.

CONCLUSION

SA-ACLR is associated with improved short-term functional PROMs compared to the standard hamstring ACLR. Although SA did not reduce the retear rate, and infection and DVT rates did not differ between study groups, superior improvement of PROMs in SA approach, leverages this method for ACLR.

Primary anterior cruciate ligament repair: Current concepts

The renewed interest in ACL repair over the last two decades stems from advances in modern arthroscopic techniques and clinical studies that have provided evidence that the ACL can reliably heal, and patients can return to sport at a comparable rate to ACL reconstruction patients. The ability to maintain and utilize native ACL tissue, with proprioceptive capabilities, and the smaller drill tunnels needed to repair an ACL leads to an overall less invasive procedure and improved early rehabilitation. Additionally, repair avoids a variety of comorbidities associated with autograft harvest. This current concept review details modern techniques of ACL repair and their current studies, a review on the use of biologic enhancement in ACL repair, and other considerations to appropriately integrate ACL repair into the sports medicine orthopaedic surgeon's practice.

There is no difference in the efficacy of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autograft combined with or without ligament augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aims to determine the efficacy of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using autograft combined with or without ligament augmentation.

METHODS

A computerized search of the databases was conducted, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. Only prospective or retrospective comparative studies with a minimum 2-year follow-up were considered for inclusion. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and methodological quality assessment. A Mantel-Haenszel analysis was used for the pooling of results. Sensitivity analysis was performed to maintain the stability of results. The egger test was applied to assess the publication bias.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included. The total cohort was 1353 patients (non-augmented group: 763 patients; augmented group: 590 patients). There were three Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs, Level I), six retrospective comparative studies (Level III) and five case-control studies (Level III). The follow-up rate was ≥ 88% and the follow-up periods were ≥ 24 months in all included studies. The augmented graft used to compare with autograft included the Ligament Augmentation Device (LAD), the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS) artificial ligament, FiberTape, hamstring tendon allograft, degradable poly (urethane urea). No significant differences were observed between the augmented and non-augmented groups regarding postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score and Tegner score, knee laxity, including KT-1000, side-to-side difference, Lachman test and pivot shift and rate of graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

ACLR using autografts combined with ligament augmentation shows no advantages in PROs, knee laxity and graft failure rate compared with using autografts only.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The research protocol was registered at the PROSPERO database (CRD42022324784).

Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Independently Tensioned Suture Tape Augmentation at 5-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction using autograft remains the gold standard surgical treatment for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. However, up to 10% to 15% of patients will suffer a graft failure in the future. Cadaveric studies have demonstrated that the addition of suture tape augmentation to ACL autograft constructs can increase graft strength and reduce elongation under cyclical loading.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and rerupture rates after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with suture tape augmentation. We hypothesized that augmentation with suture tape would lead to lower rerupture rates.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary ACLR using hamstring or patellar tendon autografts augmented with suture tape between 2015 and 2019 were recruited prospectively. Patients with multiligament injuries or a concomitant lateral extra-articular procedure were excluded. Patients were observed in person for 6 months, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected at 2 and 5 years postoperatively. All patients were contacted, and records were reviewed to determine the incidence of graft failure. PROMs collected were as follows: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), Tegner and Marx activity scores, and visual analog scale for pain (VAS).

RESULTS

A total of 97 patients, with a mean age of 34.7 (±13.4) years, were included (76% men; 52 hamstring and 45 patellar tendon grafts). The mean graft diameter was 8 (±1) mm. There was 1 rerupture (1.1%) out of the 90 patients who were contactable at a mean of 5 years postoperatively. Median KOOS scores at 2 years were as follows: Pain, 94; Symptoms, 86; Activities of Daily Living, 99; Sport and Recreation, 82; and Quality of Life, 81. The postoperative scores were significantly higher than the preoperative scores (P < .001). The VR-12 Physical score improved from 43 preoperatively to 55 at 2 years and remained at 56 at 5 years. The VAS pain, Tegner, and Marx scores were 0, 6, and 9, respectively, at 2 years postoperatively. There was no difference in PROMs between graft types.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates encouraging results of suture tape augmentation of autograft ACLR for both hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. The failure rate of 1.1% at a mean follow-up of 5 years is lower than published rates for reconstruction, and PROMs results are satisfactory. The technique is safe to use and may permit a return to the preinjury sporting level with a lower chance of reinjury.

Evaluation of biomechanical properties and biocompatibility: are partially absorbable cords eligible for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Introduction: Independent augmentation technology based on reinforcing devices has been reported to signifi-cantly reduce the elongation behavior of graft and improve knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Using biodegradable devices could reduce the risk of severe inflammatory reactions due to particle accumulation from foreign bodies. Given the limitations of the mechanical properties of biodegradable materials, partially biodegradable composite devices may offer a compromise strategy. Methods: Three types of partially absorbable core-sheath sutures, including low-absorbable cord (LA-C), medium-absorbable cord (MA-C) and high-absorbable cord (HA-C), were braided using unabsorbable ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) yarn and absorbable polydioxanone (PDO) monofil-ament bundle based on the desired configuration. The feasibility of these partially absorbable cords were verified by biomechanical testing, material degradation testing, and cell experiments, all performed in vitro. Results: Reinforcement of an 8 mm graft with the cords decreased dynamic elongation by 24%-76%, was positively related to dynamic stiffness, and increased the failure load by 44%-105%, during which LA-C showed maximum enhancement. Human ligament-derived fibroblasts showed good proliferation and vitality on each cord over 2 weeks and aligned themselves in the direction of the fibers, especially the UHMWPE portion. Discussion: This study supports the potential of partially degradable UHMWPE/PDO cords, particularly LA-C, for graft protection. Nervertheless, a higher proportion of biodegradable material results in lower stiffness, which may impair the protective and lead to mechanical instability during degradation.

Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Repair Show Similar Improvement in Outcome Scores, But Repair Shows Higher Rates of Knee Stiffness and Failure: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To compare patient-reported outcomes and complications in patients with medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries undergoing repair versus reconstruction with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase-computerized databases from database inception to November 2022, according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies evaluating clinical outcomes and complications at a minimum of 2 years following MCL repair versus reconstruction were included. Study quality was assessed using the MINORS criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies published from 1997 to 2022, consisting of 503 patients were identified. Twelve studies (n = 308 patients; mean age: 32.6 years) reported outcomes following MCL reconstruction, and 8 studies (n = 195 patients; mean age: 28.5 years) reported results following MCL repair. Postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, and Tegner scores ranged from 67.6 to 91, 75.8 to 94.8, and 4.4 to 8, respectively, in the MCL reconstruction group, compared to 73 to 91, 75.1 to 98.5, and 5.2 to 10, respectively, in the MCL repair group. Knee stiffness was the most commonly reported complication following MCL repair (range: 0% - 50%) and reconstruction (range: 0% - 26.7%). Failures occurred in 0% to 14.6% of patients following reconstruction versus 0% to 35.1% of patients undergoing MCL repair. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for postoperative arthrofibrosis (range: 0% - 12.2%) and surgical debridement for arthrofibrosis (range: 0% - 20%) were the most commonly reported reoperations in the MCL reconstruction and repair groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MCL reconstruction versus repair both demonstrate improved International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, and Tegner scores. MCL repair demonstrates higher rates of postoperative knee stiffness and failure at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.

Reduced Incidence of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Internal Brace Augmentation

Background

Revision rates and outcome measures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with suture tape as an internal brace is not well-documented because of the emerging nature of the technique.

Hypothesis

ACLR with internal bracing (IB) would lead to decreased revision ACLR compared with traditional ACLR while exhibiting comparable patient outcomes.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 200 patients were included in this study. Patients aged between 13 and 39 years at the time of surgery who underwent primary autograft ACLR with IB between 2010 and 2020 and were enrolled in our institution's registry with a minimum of 2-year follow-up were identified and matched 1 to 1 with a non-internal brace (no-IB) group based on concomitant procedures and patient characteristics. Pre- and postoperatively, patients completed the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Marx activity rating scale, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey, and visual analog scale for pain. Knee laxity measurements via the KT-1000 arthrometer were included in the pre- and postoperative objective clinical assessments.

Results

A total of 100 IB patients were matched with 100 no-IB patients based primarily on concomitant procedures and secondarily on patient characteristics. The IB group underwent significantly fewer revision ACLRs (1% vs 8%; P = .017). Even though the no-IB group had a significantly longer mean final follow-up time (48.6 months [95% CI, 45.4-51.7] vs 33.4 months [95% CI, 30.3-36.5]; P < .001), the time elapsed from the original ACLR to the revision did not differ significantly between groups, and the mean ages for the IB and no-IB groups were comparable (19 vs 19.9 years). All postoperative patient-reported outcome scores between the 2 groups were comparable and significantly improved postoperatively except for the Marx score, which significantly decreased stepwise for both groups postoperatively. KT-1000 measurements significantly improved in both groups after surgery with the IB and no-IB cohorts yielding comparable results at the manual maximum pull (0.97 vs 0.65 mm).

Conclusion

ACLR with IB resulted in a significantly decreased risk of revision ACLRs while maintaining comparable patient-reported outcomes. Therefore, incorporating an internal brace into ACLR appears to be safe and effective within these study parameters.

Material Properties of Suture Augmentation of Knee Medial Collateral Ligament Repair Did Not Influence Length Changes or Failure Loads in a Caged Porcine Model

Purpose

To investigate whether the biomechanical properties of the healed superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) repaired by augmentation vary depending on the material properties of the suture augmentation.

Methods

In 8 of 10 porcines (16 hindlimbs), the sMCL was detached from the femoral attachment using a scalpel under intubated general anesthesia. sMCL repair was performed using an ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) tape for the right hindlimbs and polyester tape (PE) for the left hindlimbs. They were sacrificed at 4 weeks postoperatively. The remaining 2 animals were assigned to the native control group (left and right hindlimb; n = 4). All connective tissues and suture augmentation, except for the repaired sMCL, were removed, and their biomechanical properties were evaluated.

Results

No significant differences were observed in the upper yield load (PE group, 247.4 ± 116.0 N; UHMWPE group, 279.9 ± 95.7 N; and sham group, 231.6 ± 50.6 N; P = .70), maximum yield load (PE group, 310.1 ± 166.1 N; UHMWPE group, 334.6 ± 95.2 N; and sham group, 290.9 ± 42.3 N; P = .84), linear stiffness (PE group, 43.3 ± 16.5 N/mm; UHMWPE group, 52.0 ± 28.2 N/mm; and sham group, 44.7 ± 7.2 N/mm; P = .66), and elongation at failure (PE group, 9.4 ± 4.3 mm; UHMWPE group, 9.1 ± 2.7 mm; and sham group, 10.1 ± 2.1 mm; P = .89). Statistical analysis of failure modes showed no significant difference between the groups (P = .21).

Conclusions

The material properties of suture augmentation used for sMCL repair did not significantly influence length changes during cyclic loading, postoperative structural properties, or failure modes.

Clinical Relevance

The results of this study provide valuable information regarding the efficacy of suture augmentation repair regardless of the materials used.

Anatomical Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Augmentation

Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene sutures are used for repair and reconstruction of extra-articular ligaments in the knee, elbow, and ankle joints. In recent years, the use of these sutures has become popular in a suture augmentation technique and has been applied for use in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, which is an intra-articular ligament. Although several surgical techniques have been described in Technical Notes, all reports have been for single-bundle reconstruction, and none have applied the technique to double-bundle reconstruction. This Technical Note provides a detailed description of an anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with the suture augmentation technique.

Suture Augmentation Does Not Change Biomechanical Properties and Histological Remodeling of Tendon Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Study in a Porcine Model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the initial safety of the combined use of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) sutures for suture augmentation (SA) in a porcine ACL reconstruction model and examine whether the procedure can affect the anterior knee laxity and structural properties of the tendon graft itself, influence histological remodeling, and cause a foreign body-induced inflammation.

METHODS

Ten pigs were divided into SA and non-SA Groups to undergo ACL reconstruction using an autologous semitendinosus tendon with and without SA, respectively. At 12 weeks postoperatively, the tibial fixation of the grafted tendon and SA was removed, and the anterior knee laxity and structural characteristics of the grafted tendon were evaluated for mechanical testing. Histological evaluation, including the ligament tissue maturation index (LTMI) score and the presence or absence of foreign-body reaction, was evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in anterior laxity between the two groups (SA Group, 1.19 ± 0.78 mm; non-SA Group, 1.08 ± 0.42 mm; P = 1). There were no significant differences in maximum load failure, yield strength, stiffness, elongation at failure, and the LTMI score between the two groups (P = 0.31, 1, 1, 1, and 0.24, respectively). All grafted tendons showed no foreign-body reactions.

CONCLUSION

Suture augmentation did not have significant effect on the anterior knee laxity and the structural properties of the grafted tendon, interfere with histological remodeling, or cause foreign body-induced reactions.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results of our study may lay the foundation for further clinical studies to verify the usefulness of ACL reconstruction with SA.

Is augmentation the best solution in partial anterior cruciate ligament tears? A literature systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

The appropriate management of partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears is still debated. There is a tendency in orthopedic clinical practice to prefer complete ACL reconstruction, while few surgeons perform ACL augmentation. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the current evidence on the effectiveness of ACL augmentation compared with standard ACL reconstruction to assess whether ACL augmentation may be the treatment of choice in partial ACL injury.

Methods

According to PRISMA guidelines, literature research was performed in PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. A PICOS model was used, and a preliminary search resulted in 1101 articles. The methodological quality was assessed through ROBINS-I. A meta-analysis was conducted on postoperative Tegner, Lysholm scores and KT-1000 values between ACL augmentation and ACL reconstruction, and a p < 0.05 has been assumed as statistically significant. PROSPERO, ID: CRD42022343502.

Results

Seven papers were included. A total of 472 knees underwent ACL reconstruction, and 311 underwent ACL augmentation. A statistically significant discrepancy was found in the postoperative Tegner score in favor of ACL augmentation compared with ACL reconstruction (p < 0.05). Regarding the postoperative Lysholm score and KT-1000 measurement, no statistically significant difference was shown between ACL reconstruction and ACL augmentation (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

ACL augmentation has proved to be an effective and safe procedure and should be preferred to ACL reconstruction in partial ACL tears for the tendency to achieve better functional outcomes.

Suture tape augmentation, a novel application of synthetic materials in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review

Objective: Suture tape (ST) is a common synthetic material in the repairing surgery of soft tissue. Recently, ST augmentation (STA) technique has been described as a novel way to improve the mechanical property of grafts in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). However, the clinical outcomes of ACLR using ST-augmented grafts have not been clarified. This systematic review aimed to summarize the specific technique of STA and evaluate the clinical outcomes after ACLR with STA. Methods: A electronic search of PubMed and Embase databases with a manual search of Google Scholar was performed to identify studies that reported the clinical outcomes of ACLR with STA. Each included study was abstracted regarding the study features, patient data, surgical information, and outcome measures. Results: Nine studies were included, representing 314 knees in 314 patients undergoing ACLR with STA. Technically, ST was fixed independently from grafts in six studies and along with grafts in two studies. Most studies applied an equal or slightly less tension on ST than ACL graft. Clinically, significant improvements were found in the Lysholm, IKDC, and KOOS scores after a mean follow-up of 16.7 months. Physical examinations of 220 patients showed significant restoration of knee stability at the final follow-up. 59 of 80 (73.8%) patients returned to preinjury sports level at a minimum 2 year follow-up. Six of 266 (2.3%) patients had a graft failure during the first 2 years postoperatively. The use of ST was significantly associated with better Tegner scores and a trend toward significantly higher rates of return to sport compared to standard ACLR. No significant difference was found in most subjective scores, knee laxity, and graft failures between ACLR with or without STA. Conclusion: ACLR with STA achieved overall favorable clinical outcomes. Patients using ST-augmented grafts were seemingly associated with better sports performance compared to standard ACLR. But ACLR with STA was not superior to ACLR alone in most functional scores, knee stability measures, and graft failure rates. A tension equal to or slightly less than the ACL graft should be carefully applied on ST during fixation to avoid stress shielding of the graft.

Postless Tape Augmentation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction

Suture or tape augmentation for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been described as a technique to increase biomechanical strength and potentially improve clinical outcomes. However, the suture or tape used for augmentation usually requires independent tibial fixation from the ACL graft in the form of an anchor or post. This may introduce the potential for graft and augment tension mismatch, while increasing surgical cost. We present our technique for ACL reconstruction with postless tape augmentation. The ACL graft and tape are fixed at the same tension with interference fixation using a single tibial sheath and screw construct, which allows for ACL augmentation without the need for an additional post or implant.