Double-Tunnel Technique Was Similar to Single-Tunnel Technique in Clinical, Imaging and Functional Outcomes for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Independent Risk Factors Associated With Venous Thromboembolism After Knee Arthroscopy: A Retrospective Study of 222 Patients

Background

A serious complication after knee arthroscopy is venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes both deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). However, asymptomatic VTE is frequently undetected.

Purpose

To (1) report the incidence of VTE after knee arthroscopy using ultrasound examination and computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and (2) discover the independent risk factors of VTE after knee arthroscopy and determine the corresponding cutoff values of these indicators.

Study Design

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Included were 222 patients (115 male) who underwent arthroscopic knee procedures between October 2022 and January 2023. Baseline characteristics, blood test results, and VTE assessments were collected. During the 2-week follow-up, routine lower extremity vascular ultrasound was applied for DVT measurement, with CTPA evaluation for suspected PE. Patients were allocated into VTE and no-VTE groups, and descriptive statistics were used to analyze baseline data. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the correlation between binary variables and the presence of postoperative VTE. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was further performed to determine the independent risk factors of VTE.

Results

Of the 222 patients, 37 (16.7%) had DVT and 1 (0.5%) had both DVT and PE. Compared to the no-VTE group, the VTE group was significantly older, with more female patients; higher body mass index (BMI) and postoperative D-dimer level; and higher rates of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, varicose veins of the lower extremity, and abnormal postoperative fibrin degradation product level (P≤ .043 for all). Notably, operative time >20 minutes was not significantly associated with postoperative VTE (P = .513). The independent risk factors for VTE included age >32 years (odds ratio [OR], 20.71 [95% CI, 4.40-97.47]; P < .001), BMI >23 kg/m2 (OR, 3.52 [95% CI, 1.11-11.14]; P = .032), hyperlipidemia (OR, 6.81 [95% CI, 1.86-24.88]; P = .004), and postoperative D-dimer level >0.63 mg/L (OR, 34.01 [95% CI, 7.36-157.07]; P < .001).

Conclusion

The incidence of VTE after knee arthroscopy was 16.7% at the 2-week follow-up. Age >32 years, BMI >23 kg/m2, hyperlipidemia, and postoperative D-dimer >0.63 mg/L were independent risk factors of postoperative VTE within 2 weeks after knee arthroscopy. For patients with knee arthroscopy, the cutoff value of postoperative D-dimer for VTE was found to be 0.63 mg/L for timely intervention.

Three different patellar fixation techniques yield similar clinical and radiological outcomes in recurrent patellar dislocation undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of three different patellar fixation techniques on medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) in the treatment of patellar dislocation (PD).

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2020, 130 patients with recurrent PD who underwent surgical reconstruction were eligible for this retrospective study: 48 patients were treated with the semi-tunnel bone bridge fixation technique (Group A), 42 patients were treated with the suture anchor fixation technique (Group B) and 40 patients were treated with the transpatellar tunnel fixation technique (Group C). Clinical outcomes included functional outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores), activity levels (Tegner activity score and return to sports), physical examinations, patellar re-dislocation rate and complications. Radiological outcomes included patellar congruence angle, patellar tilt angle, lateral patellar translation and lateral patellar angle.

RESULTS

All clinical and radiological outcomes improved significantly in all groups, without any significant difference among these three groups. At the final follow-up, no re-dislocation occurred, and all groups achieved a successful return to sports. However, the semi-tunnel bone bridge and suture anchor fixation techniques showed statistically higher Tegner activity scores (p = 0.004) and shorter time from surgery to return to sports (p = 0.007) than the transpatellar tunnel fixation technique.

CONCLUSION

The three MPFLR patellar fixation techniques achieved favourable and comparable clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of PD. Compared with the transpatellar tunnel fixation technique, the semi-tunnel bone bridge and suture anchor fixation techniques may be more effective with higher activity levels.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Double-Level Knee Derotational Osteotomy Yields Better Postoperative Outcomes Than Tibial Tubercle Transfer Combined With Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Patients With Recurrent Patellar Instability and Severe Malrotation

PURPOSE

To assess the postoperative outcomes of double-level knee derotational osteotomy (KDRO) combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and to compare it with tibial tuber transfer (TTT) and MPFLR without derotational osteotomy in patients with recurrent patellar instability and a marked torsional deformity.

METHODS

From March 2020 to December 2021, patients with torsion deformity (combined femoral torsion [FT] and tibial torsion [TTn] ≥30°) were retrospectively included. The minimum follow-up time was 18 months. Patients who received KDRO and MPFLR were categorized as the KDRO group and patients who received a combined TTT and MPFLR were categorized as the control group. Preoperative and postoperative clinical symptoms, patient-reported outcomes (Kujala, visual analog scale, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome scores), and imaging parameters (FT, TTn, patellar height, femoral trochlear dysplasia, congruence angle, patellar tilt angle, lateral patellar angle, lateral patellar translation, and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance) were analyzed.

RESULTS

In all, 36 patients were included with 18 in KDRO group and 18 in control group. The mean follow-up time was 30 (range 21-39) months. At the latest follow-up, no patient experienced redislocation in either group. Except for the FT and TTn in the control group, postoperative imaging parameters were significantly reduced to the normal range. KDRO group had a lower patellar tilt angle (P = .043, effect size 0.64). All clinical scores in both groups significantly improved postoperatively. The KDRO group had better functional scores than control group except the KOOS daily living activities subscore and the KOOS sports and recreation subscore. More patients in the KDRO group met the minimal clinically important difference for most patient-reported outcomes than the control group. Eight patients (44%) in the control group complained of postoperative anterior knee pain, compared with 1 patient (6%) in the KDRO group (P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

KDRO combined with MPFLR was associated with better postoperative outcomes than TTT combined with MPFLR in patients with recurrent patellar instability and a torsion deformity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

The Value of Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Commonly Used Patient-Reported Outcomes in Recurrent Patellar Instability Patients After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction and Tibial Tubercle Transfer

PURPOSE

To identify the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for commonly used patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in recurrent patellar instability patients after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and tibial tubercle transfer (TTT), and to determine the impact of potential prognostic factors on the likelihood of achieving these values.

METHODS

From April 2015 to February 2021, patients who underwent MPFLR and TTT were retrospectively reviewed. PROs included Kujala, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS), Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Tegner score. Relevant anchor questions were provided. A distribution- or anchor-based method was adopted to determine the MCID, SCB, and PASS. Minimal detectable change (MDC) was included to confirm the validity. Univariate regression analyses were conducted to determine the potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-two patients were included. The MCID were 9.1 (Kujala), 11.1 (Lysholm), 0.9 (Tegner), 9.9 (IKDC), 9.0 (KOOS-Pain), 10.8 (KOOS-Symptoms), 10.0 (KOOS-Activities of Daily Living [ADL]), 17.8 (KOOS-Sports and Recreation [Sports/Rec]), and 12.7 (KOOS-Quality of Life [QoL]). The SCB were 14.5 (Kujala), 12.5 (Lysholm), 1.5 (Tegner), 14.5 (IKDC), 13.9 (KOOS-Pain), 14.3 (KOOS-Symptoms), 18.4 (KOOS-ADL), 47.5 (KOOS-Sports/Rec), and 15.0 (KOOS-QoL). The PASSs were 85.5 (Kujala), 75.5 (Lysholm), 3.5 (Tegner), 73.2 (IKDC), 87.5 (KOOS-Pain), 73.2 (KOOS-Symptoms), 92.0 (KOOS-ADL), 77.5 (KOOS-Sports/Rec), and 53.1 (KOOS-QoL). All SCBs were valid except KOOS-QoL. All MCIDs were valid at the 95% confidence interval (CI) except KOOS scores, the majority of which were valid at the 90% CI. A younger age was an independent prognostic factor of reaching PASS for Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner, and KOOS-ADL score. A higher baseline score was a negative prognostic factor for achieving MCID or SCB but had a slightly positive influence on the achievement of PASS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study established the MCID, SCB, and PASS for commonly used PROs and confirmed their validity in recurrent patellar instability patients after MPFLR and TTT. Younger age and lower baseline scores were prognostic factors of achieving MCID and SCB, whereas patients with higher baseline scores were more likely to report satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Surgical techniques for medial Patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I and II studies

PURPOSE

To determine the most optimal surgical technique for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR).

METHODS

Three databases MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE were searched from inception to December 13th, 2022, for level I or II studies comparing MPFLR techniques. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on patient-reported outcome measures were recorded. Quality assessment was carried out using the MINORS and Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tools. Certainty of evidence was carried out with the GRADE assessment tool.

RESULTS

Ten studies comprising 723 patients (723 knees) were included in this review. The weighted mean difference in Kujala, Lysholm, and IKDC scores comparing single- and double-tunnel patellar drilling techniques was 2.66 (95% CI -1.05-6.37, p = 0.16, I2 = 0%) with moderate certainty, 0.78 (95% CI -9.02-10.58, p = 0.88, I2 = 87%) with low certainty, and 1.71 (95% CI -2.43-5.86, p = 0.42, I2 = 0%) with low certainty, respectively. Double-suture anchor patellar fixation demonstrated greater Kujala scores than transpatellar fixation (87.1 ± 2.8 vs 84.0 ± 3.8, p < 0.001) with moderate certainty. Y-shaped graft patellar fixation demonstrated superior Kujala scores to C-shaped graft patellar fixation (95.9 ± 4.7 vs 91.3 ± 9.7, p = 0.001) with moderate certainty. Augmentation of femoral fixation with polyester sutures demonstrated superior Kujala scores (97.8 ± 6.4. vs 88.0 ± 6.3, p < 0.005) with low certainty. Four-stranded grafts demonstrated greater Kujala scores than two-stranded grafts (93.5 ± 2.6 vs 91.6 ± 3.5, p = 0.01) with low certainty.

CONCLUSION

The optimal MPFLR surgical technique is likely to utilize a four-stranded graft using either endobutton, double-suture anchor, or transosseous suture patellar fixation with polyester suture augmented interference screw femoral fixation. Orthopedic surgeons can consider employing such a technique to improve patient outcomes by conferring greater graft stability, strength, and function. Level of evidence Level II.

Double-Limb Graft Versus Single-Limb Graft Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies

BACKGROUND

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the most important stabilizer of lateral dislocation of the patella. Single-limb (SL) and double-limb (DL) graft MPFL reconstructions have been increasingly used to treat recurrent patellar dislocations, but the clinical efficacy of SL versus DL graft MPFL reconstructions remains controversial owing to the inconsistent conclusions of previous studies.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of SL and DL graft MPFL reconstructions for patients with recurrent patellar dislocation by conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. The retrieval time was up to July 25, 2022. Two evaluators independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the enrolled studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of 4 randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies with 451 patients were included. The joint stability and functional scores in both groups improved significantly from baseline. When compared with SL graft reconstruction, DL graft reconstruction provided reduced recurrent instability (P = .01), anterior patella-related pain (P = .02), and patellar lateral shift rate (P = .02). Regarding functional recovery, patients undergoing DL graft reconstruction presented better scores on the Kujala (P < .001), Tegner (P = .009), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (P < .001) but similar Lysholm scores as compared with SL graft reconstruction. No statistically significant difference was found between the techniques in the reduction of the patellar tilt angle, complications other than anterior patella-related pain, or postoperative pain.

CONCLUSION

When compared with SL graft MPFL reconstruction, DL graft MPFL reconstruction yielded better outcomes in terms of postoperative recurrent instability, anterior patella-related pain, patellar lateral shift rate, Kujala score, Tegner score, and IKDC score. The amount of high-quality evidence is insufficient, so this conclusion should be interpreted with caution.

Effect of Lower Extremity Torsion on Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction and Tibial Tubercle Transfer for Recurrent Patellofemoral Instability

BACKGROUND

Increased femoral torsion (FT) or tibial torsion (TT) has been suggested to be a potential risk factor for recurrent patellofemoral instability. However, the influence of increased FT or TT on the postoperative clinical outcomes of recurrent patellofemoral instability has rarely been investigated.

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of increased FT or TT on postoperative results in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability after combined medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and tibial tubercle transfer, along with the influence of other risk factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Out of 91 patients, the study's analyses included 86 patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability who were treated with MPFLR and tibial tubercle transfer and enrolled between April 2020 and January 2021. FT and TT were assessed using preoperative computed tomography images. According to the torsion value of FT or TT, patients were categorized into 3 groups for each of FT and TT: group A (<20°), group B (20°-30°), and group C (>30°). Patellar height, femoral trochlear dysplasia, and the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance were also assessed. Patient-reported outcome scores (Tegner, Kujala, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Lysholm, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]) were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Clinical failure of MPFLR was recorded. Subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of increased FT or TT on the postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up time of 25 months. At the final follow-up, all functional scores improved significantly. Patella alta, high-grade trochlear dysplasia, and increased TT-TG distance did not have any significant effect on the postoperative functional scores. Regarding FT, subgroup analysis indicated that all functional scores of group C were lower than those of groups A and B except the KOOS knee-related Quality of Life score. For TT, group C had lower scores than group A for all functional outcomes except Tegner and KOOS Quality of Life and lower scores than group B for Kujala, IKDC, KOOS (Symptoms and Sport and Recreation subscales), Tegner, and Lysholm scores. The comparison between group A and group B, whether for FT or TT, revealed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

For patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability, increased lower extremity torsion (FT or TT >30°) was associated with inferior postoperative clinical outcomes after combined MPFLR and tibial tubercle transfer.

Editorial Commentary: Two Fixation Points Are Better for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction-To Minimize Complications, Bone Tunnels Should Be Avoided

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has gained in popularity over the past 15 years, with most studies showing a clear advantage over techniques such as MPFL repair or medial imbrication for the treatment of patellar instability. A debate continues as to the type of fixation on the patella, tunnel versus suture anchor, as well as the number of fixation points. In fact, some senior patellofemoral surgeons have opted away from patellar bony fixation altogether to avoid complications associated with patellar fixation such as fracture or penetration of the articular cartilage. In my practice, I prefer to use 2 all-suture suture anchors for patellar fixation as there is minimal risk of fracture or significant cartilage damage compared with tunnel drilling or placement of larger suture anchors. The graft choice for MPFL reconstruction has been shown to be relatively unimportant, and for this reason, I typically choose gracilis allograft to avoid graft-site morbidity and hamstring weakness.