Editorial Commentary: Artificial Intelligence for the Wrist: Moving to the Forefront of Diagnostic Imaging for Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Injury

Recommended Requirements and Essential Elements for Proper Reporting of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Tools in Biomedical Research and Scientific Publications

Essential elements required for proper use of artificial intelligence machine learning tools in biomedical research and scientific publications include (1) explanation justifying why a machine learning approach contributes to the purpose of the study; (2) description of the adequacy of the data (input) to produce the desired results (output); (3) details of the algorithmic (i.e., computational) approach including methods for organizing the data (preprocessing); the machine learning computational algorithm(s) assessed; on what data the models were trained; the presence of bias and efforts to mitigate these effects; and the methods for quantifying the variables (features) most influential in determining the results (e.g., Shapley values); (4) description of methods, and reporting of results, quantitating performance in terms of both model accuracy and model calibration (level of confidence in the model's predictions); (5) availability of the programming code (including a link to the code when available-ideally, the code should be available); (6) discussion of model internal validation (results applicable and sensitive to the population investigated and data on which the model was trained) and external validation (were the results investigated as to whether they are generalizable to different populations? If not, consideration of this limitation and discussion of plans for external validation, i.e., next steps). As biomedical research submissions using artificial intelligence technology increase, these requirements could facilitate purposeful use and comprehensive methodological reporting.

Artificial Intelligence Aids Detection of Rotator Cuff Pathology: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To determine the model performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting rotator cuff pathology using different imaging modalities and to compare capability with physicians in clinical scenarios.

METHODS

The review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO. The criteria were as follows: 1) studies on the application of AI in detecting rotator cuff pathology using medical images, and 2) studies on smart devices for assisting in diagnosis were excluded. The following data were extracted and recorded: statistical characteristics, input features, AI algorithms used, sample sizes of training and testing sets, and model performance. The data extracted from the included studies were narratively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 14 articles, comprising 23,119 patients, met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The pooled mean age of the patients was 56.7 years, and the female rate was 56.1%. The area under the curve (AUC) of the algorithmic model to detect rotator cuff pathology from ultrasound images, MRI images, and radiographic series ranged from 0.789 to 0.950, 0.844 to 0.943, and 0.820 to 0.830, respectively. Notably, 1 of the studies reported that AI models based on ultrasound images demonstrated a diagnostic performance similar to that of radiologists. Another comparative study demonstrated that AI models using MRI images exhibited greater accuracy and specificity compared to orthopedic surgeons in the diagnosis of rotator cuff pathology, albeit not in sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of rotator cuff pathology has been significantly aided by the exceptional performance of AI models. In particular, these models are equally adept as musculoskeletal radiologists in using ultrasound to diagnose rotator cuff pathology. Furthermore, AI models exhibit statistically superior levels of accuracy and specificity when using MRI to diagnose rotator cuff pathology, albeit with no marked difference in sensitivity, in comparison to orthopaedic surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of Level III studies.